Services on Demand
Print version ISSN 0021-7557
J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) vol.86 no.2 Porto Alegre Mar./Apr. 2010
Open challenge for the diagnosis of cow's milk protein allergy
Fernanda Ferreira CorreaI;Mário César VieiraII;Danielle Reis YamamotoII; Patrícia da Graça Leite SperidiãoIII;Mauro Batista de MoraisIV
INutricionista, Disciplina de Gastroenterologia
Pediátrica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
IIMestre. Centro de Gastroenterologia Pediátrica, Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
IIIDoutora, Curso de Nutrição, UNIFESP, Santos, SP, Brazil
IVLivre-docente, Disciplina de Gastroenterologia Pediátrica, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
OBJECTIVE: To report the results of open
challenge tests performed in children fed with cow's milk-free diet.
DESCRIPTION: Cross-sectional study evaluating cow's milk open challenge performed under supervision in a hospital setting during 2.5 hours and ambulatory follow-up for 30 days when no immediate reaction occurred. One hundred and twenty-one patients were included, with ages between 4 and 95 months. Cow's milk open challenge tests were positive in 28 patients (23.1%). A clinical manifestation of cow's milk allergy different from the one presented at diagnosis occurred in 12 (24.9%) patients with positive challenge. Positive challenge was more frequent (p = 0.042) in patients fed with extensively hydrolyzed formulae or amino acid-based formulae (30.3%) when compared to those fed with other exclusion diets (14.5%).
CONCLUSION: Open challenge allowed the interruption of exclusion diet in a significant proportion of the patients.
Keywords: Milk allergy/diagnosis, milk protein, cow's milk, diagnosis, immunologic tolerance.
The most frequent food allergy in infants is cow's milk protein allergy,1-4 which may lead to gastrointestinal or cutaneous manifestations. The challenge test is of great importance for the diagnostic approach of infants with suspected cow's milk allergy or those receiving cow's milk elimination diet for the identification of tolerance development.1-5 There are three types of challenge tests: double-blind, single-blind, and open. For infants, an age group in which late reactions mediated by cells are predominant, the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition recommends that open challenge is appropriate.6 A recent review recommends that the open challenge is appropriate also for children younger than 3 years old with IgE mediated reactions.7 It must be highlighted that the challenge test must not be undertaken when previous clinical manifestations were severe and death risk may exist, as for instance, in face of previous anaphylactic reaction.
The objective of this brief communication is to report the results of an open challenge protocol performed in two Brazilian pediatric gastroenterology services in children fed with cow's milk-free diet.
In this cross-sectional study the results of the first cow's milk open challenge conducted in 121 patients of the pediatric gastroenterology outpatient clinic of Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil, and Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, Brazil, were included. Data collection was performed from June, 2006 to October, 2008. Of the 136 challenge tests performed, 121 (89.0%) tests containing all the necessary patient information were included in the study. Demographic data and clinical manifestations that motivated the diagnostic hypothesis of cow's milk allergy were collected.
The open challenges followed the same protocol in both clinics.1-5 Tests were performed in the morning, with patients fasting, under the supervision of a pediatric gastroenterologist and a nutritionist. Before the initiation of the procedure, physical examination with special attention to skin evaluation, pulmonary auscultation, and abdominal evaluation was performed. Children who were not suitable to undergo the test due to any sign or symptom that could confound test interpretation, remained on an elimination diet until their complete recovery when a new challenge was scheduled. The test was initiated in the hospital or clinic where appropriate emergency equipment for resuscitation was available. Intravenous access was not obtained in any patient before the administration of cow's milk. The follow-up period lasted for 30 days after the open challenge test performed for 2.5 hours in the hospital or outpatient clinic. Initially, a cow's milk-embedded gauze was placed in contact with perioral region and lips. After 30 minutes, 10 mL of whole cow's milk or infant formula were administered with an incremental scheme doubling the dose every 20-30 minutes for 2.5 hours. At 150 minutes, the first phase of the challenge test was finalized at the health care facilities. The test was interrupted and considered positive when one or more of the following reactions suggestive of the cow's milk protein allergy occurred: vomiting, diarrhea, blood in stools, erythematous skin rash or urticaria, rhinoconjunctivitis, and wheezing. Patients who did not present reactions suggesting cow's milk protein allergy were discharged home where normal volumes of milk were administered. This second phase of the test (follow-up period) lasted for 30 days, with the recommendation that the patients consumed cow's milk and food containing cow's milk regularly. At the end of this period, patients were evaluated to detect if clinical manifestations had occurred on a cow's milk containing diet.
When parents did not return with the patients at the end of 30-day period, a telephone interview was conducted. At the end of this period, if the patient remained asymptomatic, the challenge test was considered negative.
The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (UNIFESP), and a written informed consent was obtained from all parents or guardians.
Of the 121 patients on a cow's milk elimination diet, 69 (57.0%) were boys. At the time of the challenge, the age ranged from 4 to 95 months (mean 16.9±11.9 months). Clinical manifestations at the initiation of the elimination diet included diarrhea (28.6%), vomiting or regurgitation (27.9%), blood in stools (23.5%), irritability (16.9%), colic or abdominal pain (13.2%), atopic dermatitis (11.0%), urticaria-like manifestations (9.5%), constipation (8.1%), wheezing (6.6%), bloody diarrhea (5.8%), abdominal distention (4.4%), allergic edema of face or ears (2.9%), hematemesis (2.2%), otitis (2.2%), and rhinitis (0.7%). Of the 121 patients, 20 (14.5%) had already had a positive challenge before being referred to the specialty clinics. The duration of the elimination diet was less than 12 weeks in 31 (25.6%) patients; between 12 and 23 weeks in 28 (23.1%); between 24 and 47 weeks in 42 (34.7%); and more than 48 weeks in 20 (16.5%).
The challenge was positive in 28 (23.1%) patients, with the manifestations appearing in the first 4 hours in 14 of them; in up to 24 hours in seven; and in three of them, in more than 24 hours. Table 1 shows the clinical manifestations at diagnosis and during challenge. No patients presented with severe manifestations, like anaphylactic shock. Clinical manifestations of cow's milk allergy different from those presented at the time of diagnostic suspicion occurred in 12 (42.9%) of the 28 patients with a positive test (Table 1). Table 2 shows the association between the positive challenge tests and different variables. A higher frequency of positive tests in children who were being fed with protein hydrolysates or amino acid formulae was observed in comparison with those fed with soy formulae or without cow's milk substitutes.
The approach of the child with cow's milk protein allergy includes clinical response during elimination diet and confirmation of diagnosis through the challenge test after approximately 6 to 8 weeks. If the diagnosis is confirmed, it is recommended to repeat the challenge test every 6 to 12 months until immunologic tolerance is developed.1-5
One of the important findings in this study was that the challenge test was negative in 93 (76.8%) of the 121 patients studied. In those cases it was possible to stop cow's milk elimination diet. This approach led to an important cost reduction with the substitutive diet, especially with the use of extensively hydrolysed or amino acid-based and yet, the reduction of nutritional risks to which the patient undergoing exclusion diets is subjected.8,9 Another point that must be highlighted is the importance of a careful follow-up of patients with a negative challenge, considering that subclinical manifestations may occur.10,11
In 42.9% (12/28) of the positive challenges, clinical manifestations different from those that motivated the diagnostic suspicion of cow's milk allergy occurred. In the 1960s, Goldman et al., in their classic article,12 stated that the reappearance of the same clinical manifestations in three consecutive tests was required for the diagnosis of food allergy to be confirmed. Currently, one positive challenge test may be accepted as a diagnostic criterion.1-5 However, even if over time clinical manifestations of allergy may change, the possibility of part of these positive results being secondary to other clinical disorders must be considered. Furthermore, the physician must be alert to possible incorrect information provided by the family. Food allergy may be simulated in the Munchausen syndrome by proxy.13,14 In face of a non-characteristic or unexpected positive result, it is advisable to repeat the challenge test in a short time interval. On the other hand, when the test is negative, the possibility of the development of tolerance, few weeks after the onset of the elimination diet, must be considered.
One aspect that must be highlighted is the period of time during which the patients remained under elimination diet: 20 patients were under elimination diet for 48 weeks (approximately 11 months), and 42, between 24 to 48 weeks. In this context, it must be considered that in a great proportion of patients studied the challenge test was performed to confirm the development of tolerance and not actually to confirm the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy. Many patients were referred to the specialty clinics in order to have the open challenge performed. Another aspect that explains the long period on an elimination diet is the fact that part of the patients presented a history of recent adverse reactions after the intake, inadvertent or not, of cow's milk protein. In this context, during the follow-up of patients undergoing elimination diet, it is important to identify if cow's milk protein is effectively being excluded from the diet.
In conclusion, no severe reactions during challenge tests were observed, once a history of an anaphylactic reaction was considered a contraindication for the test. In patients with positive challenge presenting with manifestations which were different from those at diagnosis the possibility of a false positive result must be considered, and the diagnosis must be reevaluated. On the other hand, a great proportion of patients were able to stop the elimination diet, reinforcing the importance of cow's milk open challenge in the follow-up of these cases.
1. Sampson HA. Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:805-19; quiz 820. [ Links ]
2. American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. Food allergy: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;96 Suppl 2:S1-68. [ Links ]
3. Toporovski MS, Vieira MC, Spolidoro JV, Morais MB, Fagundes-Neto U. Alergia ao leite de vaca. In: Lopez FA, Campos Jr D. Tratado de Pediatria Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Barueri: Manole; 2007. p. 863-71. [ Links ]
4. Vandenplas Y, Koletzko S, Isolauri E, Hill D, Orange AP, Brueton M, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cow's milk protein allergy in infants. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:902-8. [ Links ]
5. Bock SA. Diagnostic evaluation. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1638-44. [ Links ]
6. Diagnostic criteria for food allergy with predominantly intestinal symptoms. The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Working Group for the Diagnostic Criteria for Food Allergy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1992;14:108-12. [ Links ]
7. Bahna SL. Food challenge procedure: optimal choices for clinical practice. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007;28:640-6. [ Links ]
8. Medeiros LC, Speridião PG, Sdepanian VL, Fagundes-Neto U, Morais MB. Ingestão de nutrientes e estado nutricional de crianças em dieta isenta de leite de vaca e derivados. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2004;80:363-70. [ Links ]
9. Paganus A, Juntunen-Backman K, Savilahti E. Follow-up of nutritional status and dietary survey in children with cow's milk allergy. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81:518-21. [ Links ]
10. Iynkaran N, Robinson MJ, Prathap K, Sumithran E, Yadav M. Cow's milk protein-sensitive enteropathy. Combined clinical and histological criteria for diagnosis. Arch Dis Child. 1978;53:20-6. [ Links ]
11. Latcham F, Merino F, Lang A, Garvey J, Thomson MA, Walker-Smith JA, et al. A consistent pattern of minor immunodeficiency and subtle enteropathy in children with multiple food allergy. J Pediatr. 2003;143:39-47. [ Links ]
12. Goldman AS, Anderson DW Jr, Sellers WA, Saperstein S, Kniker WT, Halpern SR. Milk Allergy. I. Oral challenge with milk and isolated milk proteins in allergic children. Pediatrics. 1963;32:425-43. [ Links ]
13. Roesler TA, Barry PC, Bock SA. Factitious food allergy and failure to thrive. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;48:1150-5. [ Links ]
14. Morais MB, Marchette AC, Speridião PG, Lopes LH, Robles RM, Benedito MD, et al. Síndrome de Munchausen por terceiro simulada como alergia alimentar múltipla: relato de caso. Rev Paul Pediatria. 2006;24:373-8. [ Links ]
Correspondence: Manuscript submitted Jul 27 2009, accepted for
publication Sep 17 2009. No conflicts of interest declared concerning
the publication of this article.
Mauro Batista de Morais
Rua Pedro de Toledo, 441
CEP 04039-031 - São Paulo, SP - Brazil
Suggested citation: Correa FF, Vieira MC, Yamamoto DR, Speridião PG, de Morais MB. Open challenge for the diagnosis of cow's milk protein allergy. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86(2):163-166.
Manuscript submitted Jul 27 2009, accepted for publication Sep 17 2009.
No conflicts of interest declared concerning
the publication of this article.