SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.92 issue6Maternal food intake and socioeconomic status to tackle childhood malnutrition,The influence of antineoplastic treatment on the weight of survivors of childhood cancer author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Jornal de Pediatria

Print version ISSN 0021-7557On-line version ISSN 1678-4782

J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) vol.92 no.6 Porto Alegre Nov./Dec. 2016

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2016.03.006 

Review articles

Sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy,☆☆

Bruno Leonardo Scofano Diasa  * 

Alexandre Ribeiro Fernandesb 

Heber de Souza Maia Filhoc 

aRede SARAH de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Setor de Reabilitação Infantil, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

bUniversidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil

cUniversidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Programa de Mestrado Profissional em Saúde Materno-Infantil, Niterói, RJ, Brazil

Abstract

Objective:

To review the literature on sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy.

Source of data:

Non-systematic review using the keywords "sialorrhea" and "child" carried out in the PubMed®, LILACS®, and SciELO® databases during July 2015. A total of 458 articles were obtained, of which 158 were analyzed as they were associated with sialorrhea in children; 70 had content related to sialorrhea in cerebral palsy or the assessment and treatment of sialorrhea in other neurological disorders, which were also assessed.

Data synthesis:

The prevalence of sialorrhea is between 10% and 58% in cerebral palsy and has clinical and social consequences. It is caused by oral motor dysfunction, dysphagia, and intraoral sensitivity disorder. The severity and impact of sialorrhea are assessed through objective or subjective methods. Several types of therapeutic management are described: training of sensory awareness and oral motor skills, drug therapy, botulinum toxin injection, and surgical treatment.

Conclusions:

The most effective treatment that addresses the cause of sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy is training of sensory awareness and oral motor skills, performed by a speech therapist. Botulinum toxin injection and the use of anticholinergics have a transient effect and are adjuvant to speech therapy; they should be considered in cases of moderate to severe sialorrhea or respiratory complications. Atropine sulfate is inexpensive and appears to have good clinical response combined with good safety profile. The use of trihexyphenidyl for the treatment of sialorrhea can be considered in dyskinetic forms of cerebral palsy or in selected cases.

KEYWORDS Sialorrhea; Cerebral palsy; Child

Introduction

Sialorrhea is the involuntary loss of saliva and oral content1,2 that usually occurs in infants; however, at 24 months of age children with typical development should have the ability to perform most activities without loss of saliva.3 After the age of 4 years, sialorrhea is abnormal and often persists in children with neurological disorders, including neuromuscular incoordination of swallowing and intellectual disabilities.1 The term cerebral palsy (CP) describes a group of movement and posture development disorders, with activity restrictions or motor disabilities caused by malformations or injuries that occur in the developing fetal or child's brain.4,5 Worldwide, the prevalence of CP is 1-5 per 1000 live births, representing the most common cause of motor disability in children.6 The prevalence of sialorrhea in CP is seldom studied, and the results cannot be compared due to variation in the study designs and patient selection.1 Some authors reported a prevalence of 10-58%,7-10 thus it is reasonable to accept that one in three patients with CP has drooling at some degree.1

Although underestimated, sialorrhea implies clinical and social consequences and has several impacts related to the overall health of children with CP, regarding dysphagia and respiratory health, their socio-emotional development, and emotional and work overload for families and caregivers.

This non-systematic review aims to update the professionals involved in the care of children with CP in relation to the literature on sialorrhea in these patients; it was carried out using the keywords "sialorrhea" and "child" in the PubMed®, LILACS®, and SciELO® databases during July 2015. A total of 458 articles were retrieved, of which 158 were analyzed, as they were associated with sialorrhea in children; 70 were related to sialorrhea in cerebral palsy or the assessment and treatment of sialorrhea in other neurological disorders, which were also assessed.

Physiology of salivation

The parotid glands produce more serous, watery saliva as a result of stimulation during meals. The sublingual and submandibular glands produce more viscous saliva, more constantly, throughout the day.11,12 On average, a person swallows approximately 600 mL of saliva every day; however, in some individuals, this volume can reach up to 1000 mL/day.11 Afferents of the fifth, seventh, ninth, and tenth cranial nerves reach the solitary tract and salivatory nuclei in the medulla. The parasympathetic stimulation reaches the submandibular salivary glands through the seventh cranial nerve and the parotid through the ninth nerve.

The preganglionic sympathetic fibers originate at the lateral intermediate column of the first and second thoracic segments and connect with the postganglionic fibers in the upper cervical sympathetic ganglion. These postganglionic sympathetic fibers reach the salivary glands passing through the section along the external carotid artery. Salivary secretion is regulated indirectly by the hypothalamus-solitary circuit and by effects directly modulated by tactile, mechanical, and gustatory reflexes. It is questionable whether an interruption can occur in this regulatory mechanism as part of encephalopathy in CP.11 Sialorrhea may vary from minute to minute, depending on factors such as hunger, thirst, fatigue, anxiety, emotional state, and the circadian rhythm of salivary production.1

Predisposing factors, physiopathology, and etiology

Reid et al. analyzed the predisposing factors of sialorrhea in children with CP (385 individuals) aged 7-14 years of age, which include the following: non-spastic types, the quadriplegic topographical pattern, absence of cervical control, severe difficulties in gross motor coordination/function, epilepsy, intellectual disability, lack of speech, open anterior bite, and dysphagia.13

Currently, it is widely accepted that sialorrhea in children with CP is not caused by hypersalivation, but by oral motor dysfunction, dysphagia, and/or intraoral sensitivity disorder.1,3,9,11,12 Senner et al. published a study that compared groups of children with CP with sialorrhea (n = 14); children with CP without sialorrhea (n = 14), and children with normal neurodevelopment (n = 14) through quantification of saliva using the Saxon test described by Kohler et al. in 1985;14 the results showed lower scores in oral motor function without excess saliva production in the CP group with sialorrhea, suggesting that the hypersalivation is not one of the factors responsible for sialorrhea in CP.3 Erasmus et al. studied groups of children with CP (n = 100) and healthy children (n = 61) through collection of saliva using the method described by Rottevel et al.15 and concluded that there were no differences between salivary flow rates in both groups of patients.11

A proper swallowing reflex is essential for the swallowing of saliva. This complex, fundamental function is mediated by orofacial neuromuscular systems, and involves a series of sequential reflexes and coordinated movements of the muscles of the mandible, lips, tongue, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus.12 Several studies have shown a positive correlation between sialorrhea in children with CP and the following factors: difficulties in the formation of the food bolus,3,7 inefficient labial sealing, suction disorder, increased food residue,3,16 difficulty controlling the lips, tongue, and mandible,3,8 reduced intraoral sensitivity,3,17 reduced frequency of spontaneous swallowing,18 esophageal phase dysphagia,3,7 and dental malocclusion.3,19 Significant negative correlations have been found between sialorrhea and chewing capacity, as well as other swallowing skills in general.3 Other factors, all common in CP, influence the presence and severity of sialorrhea: open mouth position, inadequate body posture, particularly of the head, intellectual disabilities, emotional state, and degree of concentration.1,12,20

Association between sialorrhea and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Saliva plays an important role in protecting the esophageal mucosa against lesions caused by GERD. In children with sialorrhea, the constant loss of saliva can impair the removal of gastric acid reflux into the esophagus, which can perpetuate esophageal dysmotility and esophagitis.3,21 Heine et al., in a study carried out in 1996, showed that approximately one-third of the 24 children with sialorrhea had evidence of GERD in the 24-hour pH monitoring or esophagoscopy. In this study, drug treatment with cisapride and ranitidine for GERD did not reduce the severity and frequency of sialorrhea in most children, and in the authors' opinion, saliva secretion stimulated by GERD should have clinical significance only in those patients with significant esophagitis.21

For Erasmus et al., chemical irritation caused by GERD can lead to increased production of saliva through the mediation of the parasympathetic nervous system and vagovagal reflex, aiming to protect the oropharyngeal and esophageal mucosa. In children with oral motor dysfunction, this increase in saliva production could accumulate in the pharynx and/or esophagus, increasing the risk of aspiration. In the authors' opinion, it is still a matter of debate whether GERD alone can cause severe sialorrhea and if GERD treatment can reduce its intensity in children with CP.10

Classification and clinical, social, and family implications

From a clinical point of view, sialorrhea can be classified as anterior and posterior; both can occur separately or simultaneously. Anterior sialorrhea is the unintentional loss of saliva from the mouth. Posterior sialorrhea is the flowing of saliva from the tongue to the pharynx.1,10,22

Anterior sialorrhea can lead to psychosocial, physical, and educational consequences. One of them is social isolation, which can have negative effects on self-esteem. The most severely affected children may have an unpleasant odor, and may be rejected by their peers and even by their caregivers. Individuals may be perceived negatively and their intellectual capacity may be underestimated. The extent of this impact varies according to sociocultural characteristics, depending on age and cognitive ability. Severe anterior sialorrhea requires frequent changes of clothes and can damage books, computers, and keyboards, threatening essential education and communication tools. There can also be perioral infections and damage to the dentition.1,3,10,23-28 These consequences affect the lives of patients and also have an impact on the quality of life of families and caregivers. A Dutch group demonstrated the considerable demands placed on caregivers in terms of workload, such as having to frequently remind the individual to swallow saliva, clean the excess saliva on the mouth, chin, and other areas, and change and wash towels and clothes.27,28

Posterior sialorrhea occurs in children with more severe pharyngeal phase dysphagia. These children are at risk for saliva aspiration, which can cause recurrent pneumonia and may even go undiagnosed before significant lung injury develops.10 Park et al. described two cases in which saliva aspiration into the tracheobronchial tree was successfully documented through a radionuclide assessment known as a salivagram. This same method was used and showed a total reduction in saliva aspiration after botulinum toxin was applied to patients' salivary glands.29 Vijayasekaran et al. studied a group of 62 children submitted to surgical treatment for sialorrhea, and showed an increase in the mean oxygen saturation and reduction in the frequency of pneumonia. Thus, therapeutic interventions can effectively improve respiratory health in these patients.30

Sialorrhea assessment

Clinical assessment

The different clinical aspects involved in the health status of children with CP can influence the occurrence and severity of sialorrhea and, conversely, their severity can be influenced by their presence (Fig. 1). Therefore, when evaluating sialorrhea, these several factors (Table 1) should be actively assessed by history-taking and through observation of the child.1

Figure 1 Interaction between the clinical aspects involved in the health of children with CP. GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; CPD, chronic pulmonary disease. 

Table 1 Clinical factors to be investigated. 

Clinical and social-emotional history
Motivation, physical, and cognitive ability to try to reduce sialorrhea
Use of medications (anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, neuroleptics)
Neurological examination (including state of alertness, cranial nerves, overall motor skills, posture, and tone)
Orofacial assessment (signs of upper airway obstruction)
Oral hygiene, dental occlusion and health, labial sealing
Language (dysarthria, dyspraxia) and communication skills in general
Cognition
Respiratory health (hypersecretion, bronchospasm, and recurrent infections)/atopy
Presence of GERD
Presence and assessment of dysphagia
Nutrition

GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Methods of sialorrhea measurement

It is difficult to measure sialorrhea. The child must not realize that he/she is being observed and should be assessed during everyday situations. Nevertheless, it is necessary to quantify the frequency and severity of sialorrhea, as well as its impact on the quality of life of children and their caregivers. The severity and impact of sialorrhea can be evaluated through objective or subjective methods.31

Objective methods include measurement of salivary flow and direct observation of saliva loss; some of these techniques are described in Table 2.12,21,25,26,31-35 The development of direct (objective) measurement methods for anterior sialorrhea, which are validated and actually feasible, are still a challenge both in the research field and in clinical practice.31

Table 2 Objective methods to measure sialorrhea. 

Technique Method Description
Drooling quotient (DQ)21,34 Saliva collection and use of its own formula for quantification At every 15 s, in a 15-minute period (60 observations) the presence or absence of sialorrhea was observed. DQ {%} = 100 × the number of episodes of sialorrhea/60 observations
Sochaniwskyj's technique12,35 Saliva collection and use of its own formula for quantification Collection of saliva that leaked through the mouth and reached the chin, using a glass, for a 30-minute period
Thomas-Stonnel and Greenberg scale12,26 Direct observation of the examiner quantified through a severity scale 1 - Dry lips (no sialorrhea);
2 - Wet lips (mild sialorrhea);
3 - Wet lips and chin (moderate sialorrhea);
4 - Wet clothing around the neck (severe sialorrhea);
5 - Wet clothing, hands, and objects (profuse sialorrhea)
Others31 Measuring the weight of the container used for direct collection of saliva Use of collection units, towels, and diapers or dental cotton rolls

Subjective scales are useful and appropriate methods to measure changes in sialorrhea, because the impact on families, caregivers, and the patients themselves is of utmost importance when assessing satisfaction with the effectiveness of any treatment. According to some researchers, the definitive method for evaluating the effectiveness of any treatment for sialorrhea is one that measures how much the life of the caregiver has been facilitated and that quantifies the improvement in the child's quality of life.33,36 Subjective scales such as the Drooling Rating Scale, the Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale, visual analog scales, and the Drooling Impact Scale31,33,36 are filled out by patients or their caregivers, which express their qualitative and quantitative impressions of the severity and impact of sialorrhea.31

Treatment

Objectives

The main objectives in the treatment of sialorrhea are: reduction in social-affective and health impacts caused by anterior sialorrhea; reduction in health impacts caused by posterior sialorrhea; improved quality of life for patients and caregivers; and reduction in the burden experienced by caregivers.

Quality of life and burden on family/caregivers, self-esteem, and child's health

In general, after several treatment modalities, the demands related to the care of these children are reduced, particularly regarding the frequency of the need to clean the mouth, lips, and chin; the number of changes of towels and clothes; and damage to books, school supplies, toys, and electronic equipment.36,37 Additionally, reduction in sialorrhea improves social contact between children and their peers. Even in children with intellectual disabilities, a German study has shown that the perception of parents concerning their children's satisfaction in relation to their physical appearance and life in general can improve after therapeutic interventions.36,38 van der Burg et al. published a study in which they evaluated changes in quality of life and necessity of care as a result of sialorrhea treatment. The impact of sialorrhea was investigated before and after treatment, using a questionnaire designed specifically for this study. The results demonstrated that the decrease in salivary flow had a significantly positive effect on the need for daily care. The authors conclude that reduced salivary flow should not be the only goal in the treatment of sialorrhea. It is recommended that the several therapeutic modalities be assessed in relation to the impact they bring to the patient's daily life.38

Therapeutic modalities

The literature describes several forms of therapeutic management. The advantages and disadvantages of the main treatment modalities are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 Advantages and disadvantages of the main therapeutic modalities. 

Therapeutic modalities Advantages Disadvantages
Training of sensory awareness and oral motor skills Treats the underlying cause;
Long-lasting effect
Depends on the intellectual capacity;
Requires access to regular therapy and a trained professional
Botulinum toxin use High efficacy;
Safe
Transient effect;
Requires equipment and trained multidisciplinary staff;
Requires good clinical condition for sedation or anesthesia;
Does not treat the underlying cause
Surgical treatment Definitive efficacy Definitive side effects;
Requires general anesthesia;
Demands equipment and trained surgical team;
Does not treat the underlying cause.
Pharmacological treatment with anticholinergics Proven effectiveness;
Self-administered (by the patient or caregiver);
Does not require sedation or anesthesia;
Transient side effects
Frequently anticholinergic effects (vomiting, diarrhea, irritability, changes in mood and insomnia);
Does not treat the underlying cause.

Training of sensory awareness and oral motor skills

For children capable of obeying commands and cooperating with the training, this is the foundation of intervention and should be tested before other treatment options. Initial maneuvers include improvements in the sitting position, lip movements, and closing of the mandible and tongue. In its simplest form, it consists of exercises that are carried out in a playful manner, such as the use of different textures around the mouth (ice cubes, electric toothbrush, etc.) to stimulate sensory awareness and exercises to improve lip sealing and tongue movement (using a straw, lipstick kisses on paper, filling party balloons, etc.). The constant guidance of the speech therapist is necessary. Unlike children with more severe neurological symptoms and less capacity for cooperation and understanding, those with mild sialorrhea can achieve significant benefits through such a program.39

Body modification through biofeedback

Body modification through biofeedback is based on the monitoring of the target muscle group for electromyographic stimulation. When the muscle contracts, electromyography informs of the change in muscle activity through acoustic or light signals. Thus, the patient can consciously correct or improve certain components of swallowing. The technique can have a positive impact on patient training and improving oromotor function.12,20

Orthodontic therapy

It should be used as complementary to any other treatment, and aims to prevent or correct an anterior open bite and other vertical occlusion abnormalities.12

Pharmacological and surgical therapies

Despite indications that hypersalivation is not one of the factors responsible for sialorrhea in children with CP, most available treatments - including the use of oral (OR), transdermal (TD), and sublingual (SL) medications, botulinum toxin, or surgical management - aim at the reduction in saliva production.3

There are advantages and disadvantages to the use of these techniques (Table 3) when compared with nonpharmacological and nonsurgical treatments. In general, the options aimed at reducing salivary production quickly lead to an effective reduction in sialorrhea, but with a profile of side effects inherent to each treatment modality. Another important aspect is related to the possible exacerbation of GERD and esophagitis.3 Therefore, in those patients undergoing a treatment whose mechanism of action is to reduce salivary production, early and effective GERD treatment becomes essential. In this group of treatments, each type has its peculiarities, as described below.

Botulinum toxin

The intraglandular injection of botulinum toxin inhibits the release of acetylcholine from cholinergic nerve terminals, thereby reducing salivary secretion and sialorrhea. Some prospective, controlled studies have investigated the use of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) for the treatment of sialorrhea. A significant reduction in sialorrhea was observed in these studies using objective (Class I) and subjective control scales. The injection sites are the parotid and submandibular glands. Older children (cooperative) and adults may undergo local anesthesia.1,40,41 Some disadvantages (Table 3) hinder patients' access to the procedure: the injection sites should be accessed, ideally, by ultrasound; the technique requires the presence of medical and nursing staff with experience; and it should be assessed whether the patient meets the clinical requirements to undergo sedation or anesthesia.

Surgical treatment

The first surgical treatment for sialorrhea was parotid ductal relocation,42 followed by further removal of submandibular glands.43,44 Radical procedures such as bilateral division of the parotid ducts with removal of the submandibular glands and neurectomies have been proposed, but with unpredictable results.43-48 Surgeries were carried out mostly in adults, and their efficacy was questionable, as symptoms recurred after some time.43,44 In 1974, Ekedahl described the rearrangement of ducts from the submandibular glands into the tonsilar fossa.49 The glands maintained their function with normal passage of saliva to the oropharynx, preventing the accumulation of saliva in the anterior mouth floor, ensuring the presence of saliva in the oral cavity, while keeping its contribution to the swallowing process. Over the subsequent years, it has undergone few modifications (the removal of the sublingual glands is performed concomitantly) and it has become the surgical technique of choice for severe sialorrhea.44,49 Due to the risk of permanent consequences (especially xerostomia), it is indicated only in severe cases, those non-responsive to non-surgical therapies and in which sialorrhea has great impact on the health and quality of life of the children and family members/caregivers.1

Oral, transdermal, or sublingual drug treatment

The salivary glands are controlled by the parasympathetic autonomic nervous system and, therefore, anticholinergic drugs induce a significant reduction in salivary flow, being the most often used drugs. The advantages and disadvantages of the oral (OR), transdermal (TD), or sublingual (SL) use of anticholinergic drugs are summarized in Table 3.12,50-57 The most widely used systemic anticholinergic drugs are glycopyrrolate, benztropine, scopolamine, atropine, and trihexyphenidyl; however, only trihexyphenidyl and atropine sulfate are available in Brazil; the results of some studies with these drugs are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4 Pharmacological treatment. 

Author and year Drug Associated pathology Ages n Study design Results Side effects
Mier et al.56 Glycopyrrolate CP and other neurological conditions 4-19 years 39 DB, PC Glycopyrrolate 0.10 mg/kg/dose is effective for the control of sialorrhea Incidence of 20% of SE, enough to withdraw the drug
Zeller et al.55 Glycopyrrolate CP and other neurological conditions 3-18 years 137 Uncontrolled clinical trial Satisfactory response in 40.3% of patients in the 4th week and 52.3% in the 24th week, with a peak of 56.7% in the 16th week Intestinal constipation (20.4%), vomiting (17.5%), diarrhea (17.5%), pyrexia (14.6%), xerostomia (10.9%), flushing (10.9%), nasal congestion (10. 9%)
Mato et al.50 Scopolamine TD CP and other neurological conditions 12-58 years 30 Prospective, randomized, DB, PC Significant improvement (p < 0.005) in the scopolamine group Incidence of 23% of SE (four patients with more severe SE and three with milder SE)
Camp-Bruno et al.51 Benztropine CP 4-44 years (14 children/adolescents and 6 adults) 20 DB, PC Significant reduction in sialorrhea when compared to placebo Incidence of 11% of more severe SE resolved in 24-48 h after drug withdrawal
Carranza-del Rio et al.57 Trihexyphenidyl CP 1-18 years 70 Retrospective Most patients (96%) reported some improvement in sialorrhea SE were found in 69.3% of patients: intestinal constipation (43), urinary retention (19), xerostomia (seven), blurred vision (five), increase in involuntary movements (four) reduction in seizure control (four), hallucinations (two)
De Simone et al.70 Atropine sulfate SL Upper digestive tract cancer 48-87 years 22 Prospective, randomized, DB, PC The study failed to demonstrate effectiveness of atropine sulfate compared to placebo Only one patient (xerostomia)

DB, double-blind; CP, cerebral palsy; PC, placebo-controlled; SE, side effects.

Glycopyrrolate

The oral solution of glycopyrrolate is currently the only formulation of an anticholinergic drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat sialorrhea in children aged 3-16 years. Glycopyrrolate is not available in Brazil.

Scopolamine

Several studies have shown a reduction in saliva secretion with use of scopolamine. The transdermal route effectively reduces salivary secretion in approximately 67% of patients and its action can be demonstrated 15 min after the transdermal patch is applied. The main side effects are pupil dilation and urinary retention.53 Lewis et al. observed that 66% of the patients had pupil dilation, which occurred a few days after the start of the treatment.52

Benztropine

There has been only one study with benztropine involving children. The drug was considered effective in a controlled, randomized clinical trial published by Camp-Bruno et al.51

Trihexyphenidyl

In the largest study in children with trihexyphenidyl, a drug commonly used in the treatment of extrapyramidal syndromes such as dystonia, the indications for use were dystonia (28.7%), sialorrhea (5.9%), and dystonia and sialorrhea (65.4%). The initial mean dose was 0.095 mg/kg/day and the maximum mean dose was 0.55 mg/kg/day, two to three times a day. Side effects were found in 69.3% of patients. Most patients reported some improvement in dystonia, sialorrhea, and specific language. The authors concluded that trihexyphenidyl was better tolerated in this population of children and adolescents (with CP and extrapyramidal syndrome) when compared to the adult population, and that improvement in sialorrhea may have occurred due to the anticholinergic effect of the drug, but also through central action, resulting in greater control motor of muscles involved in swallowing.57 Other studies have reported the successful use of trihexyphenidyl in adults to treat sialorrhea induced by clozapine.58-60

Atropine sulfate

Although atropine has been for many years acknowledged as effective, it has never been widely accepted for the treatment of chronic sialorrhea.54 The first mention of its use for treatment of sialorrhea was made in an article published in October 1970 by Smith et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine.61 Subsequently, some studies reported its use to treat drug-induced sialorrhea62-68 and patients with Parkinson's disease.69 De Simone et al. published the only prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind study with atropine SL, which failed to demonstrate effectiveness of atropine when compared to placebo.70 In 2010, Rapoport reported the case of 14-year old boy with metachromatic leukodystrophy and excess oral secretions who needed frequent aspirations, which caused recurrent drops in oxygen saturation caused by saliva aspiration, successfully treated with atropine sulfate SL, representing the only reported case in the literature on atropine sulfate SL in children or adolescents.54

There are no specific studies published in children with CP, but there is ongoing research using atropine SL (0.5% eye drops) in children with CP, which suggests good efficacy with low incidence of side effects. Such data will be available for publication soon.

Final considerations

In practice, to indicate any type of treatment for sialorrhea in children with CP, one should take into account the patient's access to the proposed treatment, as well as the socioeconomic and cultural characteristics of each family, in order for the individual choice of methods to be efficient, more specific, and to be less of a burden for each patient/family. The most effective treatment and the one that effectively addresses the cause of sialorrhea in children with CP is training of sensory awareness and oral motor skills, performed or supervised by a trained and qualified speech therapist.

Drug therapies, such as the use of botulinum toxin and anticholinergics, have a transient effect and should ideally be adjuvant to speech therapy, or should be considered in specific cases of patients with moderate to severe sialorrhea or respiratory complications. Among the available drugs, atropine sulfate is a low-cost, easy-access drug and appears to have good clinical response with good safety profile. The use of trihexyphenidyl for the treatment of sialorrhea in children may be considered for dyskinetic forms of CP or in some selected cases.

Please cite this article as: Scofano Dias BL, Fernandes AR, Maia Filho HS. Sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016;92:549-58.

☆☆Study carried out at Rede SARAH de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

References

1 Reddihough D, Erasmus CE, Johnson H, Mckellar GM, Jongerius PH. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and aftercare for paediatric and adult drooling: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:109-21. [ Links ]

2 Blasco PA. Surgical management of drooling. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34:368-9. [ Links ]

3 Senner JE, Logemann J, Zecker S, Gaebler-Spira D. Drooling, saliva production, and swallowing in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:801-6. [ Links ]

4 Colver A, Fairhurst C, Pharoah PO. Cerebral palsy. Lancet. 2014;383:1240-9. [ Links ]

5 Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;109:8-14. [ Links ]

6 Lee RW, Poretti A, Cohen JS, Levey E, Gwynn H, Johnston MV, et al. A diagnostic approach for cerebral palsy in the genomic era. Neuromolecular Med. 2014;6:821-44. [ Links ]

7 Ekedahl C, Mansson I, Sandberg N. Swallowing dysfunction in the brain damaged with drooling. Acta Otolaryngol. 1974;78:141-9. [ Links ]

8 Van De Heyning P, Marquet J, Creten W. Drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1980;34:691-705. [ Links ]

9 Tahmassebi JF, Curzon ME. The cause of drooling in children with cerebral palsy - hypersalivation or swallowing defect? Int J Pediatr Dent. 2003;13:106-11. [ Links ]

10 Erasmus CE, van Hulst K, Rotteveel JJ, Willemsen MA, Jongerius PH. Clinical practice: swallowing problems in cerebral palsy. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171:409-14. [ Links ]

11 Erasmus CE, Van Hulst K, Rotteveel LJ, Jongeruis PH, Van Den Hoogen FJ, Roeleveld N, et al. Drooling in cerebral palsy: hypersalivation or dysfunctional oral motor control? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:454-9. [ Links ]

12 Silvestre-Rangil J, Silvestre FJ, Puente-Sandoval A, Requeni-Bernal J, Simó-Ruiz JM. Clinical-therapeutic management of drooling: review and update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e763-6. [ Links ]

13 Reid SM, McCutcheon J, Reddihough DS, Johnson H. Prevalence and predictors of drooling in 7- to 14-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a population study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:1032-6. [ Links ]

14 Kohler PF, Winter ME. A quantitative test for xerostomia. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:1128-32. [ Links ]

15 Rotteveel LJ, Jongerius PH, van Limbeek J, Van Den Hoogen FJ. Salivation in healthy school children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;68:767-74. [ Links ]

16 Lespargot A, Langevin M, Muller S, Guillemont S. Swallowing disturbances associated with drooling in cerebral palsied children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1993;35:298-304. [ Links ]

17 Weiss-Lambrou R, Tetreault S, Dudley J. The relationship between oral sensation and drooling in persons with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. 1988;43:155-61. [ Links ]

18 Sochaniwskyj A, Koheil R, Bablich K, Milner M, Kenny DJ. Oral motor functioning, frequency of swallowing and drooling in normal children and in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:866-74. [ Links ]

19 Franklin DL, Luther F, Curzon MEJ. The prevalence of malocclusion in children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:637-43. [ Links ]

20 Morales Chávez MC, Nualart Grollmus ZC, Silvestre Donat FJ. Clinical prevalence of drooling in infant cerebral palsy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:e22-6. [ Links ]

21 Heine RG, Catto-Smith AG, Reddihough DS. Effect of antireflux medication on salivary drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38:1030-6. [ Links ]

22 Jongerius PH, Joosten F, Hoogen FJ, Gabreels FJ, Rotteveel JJ. The treatment of drooling by ultrasound-guided intraglandular injections of botulinum toxin type A into the salivary glands. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:107-11. [ Links ]

23 Cotton RT, Richardson MA. The effect of submandibular duct rerouting in the treatment of sialorrhea in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1981;89:535-41. [ Links ]

24 Harris S, Purdy A. Drooling and its management in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29:805-14. [ Links ]

25 Lew KM, Younis RT, Lazar RH. The current management of sialorrhea. Ear Nose Throat. 1991;70:99-105. [ Links ]

26 Thomas-Stonell N, Greenberg J. Three treatment approaches and clinical factors in the reduction of drooling. Dysphagia. 1988;3:73-8. [ Links ]

27 van der Burg J, Jongerius P, van Limbeek J, Van Hukst A, Rottevel J. Drooling in children with cerebral palsy: a qualitative method to evaluate parental perceptions of its impact on daily life, social interaction, and self-esteem. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29:179-82. [ Links ]

28 Reid SM, Johnstone BR, Westbury C, Rawicki B, Reddihough DS. Randomized trial of botulinum toxin injections into the salivary glands to reduce drooling in children with neurological disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:123-8. [ Links ]

29 Park HW, Lee WY, Park GY, Kwon DR, Lee ZI, Cho YW, et al. Salivagram after gland injection of botulinum neurotoxin A in patients with cerebral infarction and cerebral palsy. PM R. 2012;4:312-6. [ Links ]

30 Vijayasekaran S, Unal F, Schaff SA, Johnson RF, Rutttler RJ. Salivary gland surgery for chronic pulmonary aspiration in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;71:119-23. [ Links ]

31 van Hulst K, Lindeboom R, van der Burg J, Jongerius P. Accurate assessment of drooling severity with the 5-minute drooling quotient in children with developmental disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:1121-6. [ Links ]

32 Suskind DL, Tilton A. Clinical study of botulinum-A toxin in the treatment of sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:73-81. [ Links ]

33 Jongerius PH, van Limbeek J, Rotteveel JJ. Assessment of salivary flow rate: biologic variation and measure error. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1801-4. [ Links ]

34 Raap D. Drool control: long-term follow-up. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1980;22:448-53. [ Links ]

35 Sochaniwskyj AE. Drool quantification: noninvasive technique. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:605-7. [ Links ]

36 Reid SM, Johnson HM, Reddihough DS. The Drooling Impact Scale: a measure of the impact of drooling in children with developmental disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:e23-8. [ Links ]

37 Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J. 2005;47:458-72. [ Links ]

38 Van der Burg JJ, Jongerius PH, Van Hulst K, Van Limbeek J, Rottevel JJ. Drooling in children with cerebral palsy: effect of salivary flow reduction on daily life and care. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:103-7. [ Links ]

39 Little SA, Kubba H, Hussain SS. An evidence-based approach to the child who drools saliva. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34:236-9. [ Links ]

40 Lakraj AA, Moghimi N, Jabbari B. Sialorrhea: anatomy, pathophysiology and treatment with emphasis on the role of botulinum toxins. Toxins. 2013;5:1010-31. [ Links ]

41 Vashishta R, Nguyen SA, White DR, Gillespie MB. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of sialorrhea: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:191-6. [ Links ]

42 Wilkie TF. The problem of drooling in cerebral palsy: a surgical approach. Can J Surg. 1967;10:60-7. [ Links ]

43 Wilkie TF, Brody GS. The surgical treatment of drooling: a ten year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:791-7. [ Links ]

44 Hornibrook J, Cochrane N. Contemporary surgical management of severe sialorrhea in children. ISRN Pediatr. 2012;2012:364875. [ Links ]

45 Michel RG, Johnson KA, Patterson CN. Parasympathetic nerve section for control of sialorrhea. Arch Otolaryngol. 1977;103:94-7. [ Links ]

46 Glass LW, Nobel GL, Vecchione TR. Treatment of uncontrolled drooling by bilateral excision of submaxillary glands and parotid duct ligations. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1978;62:523-6. [ Links ]

47 Parsisier SC, Blitzer A, Binder JW. Tympanic neurectomy and corda tympanectomy for the control of drooling. Arch Otolaryngol. 1978;104:273-7. [ Links ]

48 Dundas DF, Peterson RA. Surgical treatment of drooling by bilateral parotid duct ligation and submandibular gland resection. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:47-51. [ Links ]

49 Ekedahl C. Surgical treatment of drooling. Acta Otolaryngol. 1974;77:215-20. [ Links ]

50 Mato A, Limeres J, Tomas I, Munoz M, Abuin C, Feijoo JF, et al. Management of drooling in disabled patients with scopolamine patches. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69:684-8. [ Links ]

51 Camp-Bruno JA, Winsberg BG, Green-Parsons AR, Abrams JP. Efficacy of benztropine therapy for drooling. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989;31:309-19. [ Links ]

52 Lewis DW, Fontana C, Mehallick LK, Everett Y. Transdermal scopolamine for reduction of drooling in developmentally delayed children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:484-6. [ Links ]

53 Mato Montero A, Limeres Posse J, Tomás Carmona I, Fernández-Feijoo J, Diz Dios P. Control of drooling using transdermal scopolamine skin patches. A case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:e27-30. [ Links ]

54 Rapoport A. Sublingual atropine drops for the treatment of pediatric sialorrhea. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;40:783-8. [ Links ]

55 Zeller RS, Davidson J, Lee HM, Cavanaugh PF. Safety and efficacy of glycopyrrolate oral solution for management of pathologic drooling in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy and other neurologic conditions. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2012;8:25-32. [ Links ]

56 Mier RJ, Bachrach SJ, Lajin RC, Barker T, Childs J, Moran M. Treatment of sialorrhea with glycopyrrolate: a double-blind, dose-ranging study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:1214-8. [ Links ]

57 Carranza-del Rio J, Clegg NJ, Moore A, Delgado MR. Use of trihexyphenidyl in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2011;44:202-6. [ Links ]

58 Spivak B, Adlersberg S, Rosen L, Gonen N, Mester R, Weizman A. Trihexyphenidyl treatment of clozapine-induced hypersalivation. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997;12:213-5. [ Links ]

59 Aggarwal A, Garg A, Jiloha RC. Trihexyphenidyl (benzhexol) in clozapine-induced nocturnal enuresis and sialorrhea. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63:470-1. [ Links ]

60 Praharaj SK, Sarkhel S, Khanande RV, Sinha VK. Complete resolution of clazapine-induced sialorrhea with low dose trihexyphenidyl. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2010;43:73-5. [ Links ]

61 Smith RA, Goode RL. Current concepts: sialorrhea. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:917-8. [ Links ]

62 Antonello C, Tessier P. Clozapine and sialorrhea: a new intervention for this bothersome and potentially dangerous side effect. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1999;24:250. [ Links ]

63 Comley C, Galletly C, Ash D. Use of atropine eye drops for clozapine induced hypersalivation. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000;34:1033-4. [ Links ]

64 Tessier P, Antonello C. Clozapine and sialorrhea: update. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2001;26:253. [ Links ]

65 Fischer RB. What to do in neuroleptic-induced sialorrhea. Psychiatr Prax. 2001;28:249-50. [ Links ]

66 Freudenreich O. Drug-induced sialorrhea. Drugs Today (Barc). 2005;41:411-8. [ Links ]

67 Sockalingam S, Shammi C, Remington G. Clozapine-induced hypersalivation: a review of treatment strategies. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52:377-84. [ Links ]

68 Mustafa FA, Khan A, Burke J, Cox M, Sherif S. Sublingual atropine for the treatment of severe and hyoscine-resistant clozapine-induced sialorrhea. Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2013;16:242. [ Links ]

69 Hyson HC, Johnson AM, Jog MS. Sublingual atropine for sialorrhea secondary to parkinsonism: a pilot study. Mov Disord. 2002;17:1318-20. [ Links ]

70 De Simone GG, Eisenchlas JH, Junin M, Pereyra F, Brizuela R. Atropine drops for drooling: a randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med. 2006;20:665-71. [ Links ]

Received: February 28, 2016; Accepted: March 9, 2016

* Corresponding author. E-mail:brunoscofano91@gmail.com (B.L. Scofano Dias).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivative License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited and the work is not changed in any way.