Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Print version ISSN 0034-7094
Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.54 no.2 Campinas Mar./Apr. 2004
Blood transfusion in pediatric patients and strategies to decrease it: a reevaluation*
Transfusión sanguínea en niños y los métodos para evitarla: una reevaluación
Mário José da Conceição, TSA, M.D.
Professor de Anestesiologia, Curso de Medicina, Fundação Universidade Regional de Blumenau, SC
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
Several approaches and techniques are used in adult patients to decrease or
prevent both blood loss and homologous blood transfusion during surgical procedures
where massive blood losses are expected. While these blood-sparing strategies
are widely used in adults, they are mostly neglected in children. Perhaps in
pediatric patients, these blood-sparing techniques may not be as effective as
in adults and technical limitations, as the small size of patients could limit
its advantages. In the following review, blood-sparing techniques established
for adults are described and their applicability in pediatric patients discussed.
CONTENTS: Blood-sparing strategies developed for adult patients aiming at decreasing or even preventing homologous blood transfusion when massive blood losses are expected, are presented through a bibliographic review. Since all known methods were developed for adult patients, an action line was drawn for the reevaluation of these methods, techniques and drugs to be used in pediatric patients.
CONCLUSIONS: It has become once more clear that solutions for adult patients may not be as effective for pediatric patients. Intraoperative blood-sparing techniques and consequent decrease in the need for homologous blood are effective for adult patients but are by far more invasive, complicated, and some of them ineffective in pediatric patients, especially those under two years of age.
Key Words: ANESTHESIA: Pediatric; BLOOD: hemodilution, transfusion; DRUGS: antifibrinolytics
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS:
Muchas medidas y técnicas son utilizadas, en pacientes adultos, en la tentativa
de reducir, o evitar, tanto la pérdida sanguínea como la administración
de sangre homólogo durante actos quirúrgicos para los cuales se esperan
grandes perdidas en la volemia. Entretanto, las estrategias para evitar la utilización
de sangre homólogo en pacientes adultos son largamente utilizadas, en los
pacientes pediátricos son negligenciadas. Quizás eso se deba al hecho
de que en niños esas técnicas pueden no ser tan útiles cuanto
en los adultos, además de los problemas técnicos propios del tamaño
de los pacientes. El objetivo de esa revisión fue reevaluar las técnicas
para reducir la necesidad de transfusión de sangre homólogo en adultos
y discutir su utilización en pacientes pediátricos.
CONTENIDO: Por medio de la pesquisa bibliográfica se presentan las estrategias más frecuentes para disminuir, o mismo evitar, transfusión de sangre homólogo durante actos quirúrgicos en los cuales se esperan grandes perdidas volémicas. Como todos los métodos conocidos fueron desarrollados para pacientes adultos, se proyecta, a partir de aquí, reevaluandose esos métodos, técnicas y fármacos, una línea de acción mirando su aplicabilidad a los pacientes pediátricos.
CONCLUSIONES: Mas una vez queda patente que las soluciones obtenidas para adultos no son aplicables enteramente a los pacientes pediátricos. Las medidas para reducir el sangramiento intra-operatorio y la consecuente reducción en la necesidad del uso de sangre homólogo son eficientes en pacientes adultos, no obstante son de lejos más invasivas, complicadas y muchas de ellas ineficientes en los pacientes pediátricos, notadamente en aquellos menores de dos años de edad.
Several approaches and techniques are used in adult patients to decrease or prevent both blood loss and homologous blood transfusion during surgical procedures where massive blood losses are expected 1-3. Most patients are informed about blood transfusion adverse effects, especially after the advent of the risk of contamination by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). There is also a religious faith-related problem, such as the Witnesses of Jehovah. While these blood-sparing strategies are widely used in adults, they are mostly neglected in children, as it can be seen by the few studies in the literature about the subject. Perhaps in pediatric patients, these blood-sparing techniques may not be as effective as in adults and technical limitations, as the small size of patients could limit its advantages. However, some strategies based on adult patients experiences may be used to decrease or even prevent homologous blood transfusion in some pediatric surgeries where patients have been previously selected and indications were adequately defined. In the following review, blood-sparing techniques established for adults are described and their applicability for pediatric patients is discussed.
To date, the most widely accepted technique to decrease or prevent the risks of homologous transfusion is preoperative autologous blood donation, followed or not by hemodilution 4. If there are sound scientific basis and practical usefulness for adults, this practice has several complicating factors which increase the risk for pediatric patients and may be described as follows:
- Children may need sedation or anesthesia for donation and for such, inhaled anesthetics might be preferred. Propofol, thiopental and opioids should be avoided because they may trigger adverse events at re-transfusion;
- Collection bags have to be special and smaller because traditional bags have anticoagulant solutions calculated for large adult volumes, which would be excessive for small pediatric volumes;
- Problems with venous access may prevent auto-donation in several pediatric patients where there will be problems with adequate needle size for blood collection 5.
Regardless of these complicating factors, many authors advocate auto-transfusion in children for believing that benefits overcome risks and already mentioned problems. However, due to the complexity of pediatric auto-donation, this should only be indicated for patients above 20 kg and in whom large intraoperative blood volume losses are expected 5.
Theoretically, hemodilution in pediatric patients is much easier to be performed than preoperative auto-donation. However, Bryson et al. 6 have shown in a recent meta analysis that intraoperative hemodilution has not decreased the need for homologous blood. Still according to the authors, several studies included in the meta analysis have not taken into consideration basic hemodilution principles, such as: initial hematocrit above 35% and minimum tolerated hematocrit below 25%. If these criteria were not considered, removed blood volume would be insufficient to establish a difference as to the need for homologous blood. Most times, these criteria cannot be adopted for children. First, in infants up to 6 month of age, hemodilution is counterindicated due to high fetal hemoglobin concentration. As it is well known, fetal hemoglobin shifts oxyhemglobin curve to the left, limiting tissue oxygen availability. Low hematocrit in this situation may lead to hypoxia and/or tissue ischemia. From 6 months to 1 year of age, there will be the so-called "physiological anemia" again counterindicating very low hematocrit for the same reasons. This way, hemodilution should only be used in children above 1 year of age. However there are few studies in this area to prove the efficacy and discuss potential problems like in adults 6.
Although good results obtained in adult patients with intraoperative auto-transfusions, decreasing losses and the need for homologous blood, such techniques cannot be directly applied to pediatric patients 8.
The volume of "lost" blood is almost always too low to be collected although being high for patients' volume. Very often the blood is not even aspired because it has already been absorbed by compresses, surgical drapes of surgeons gloves themselves. Even if compresses are washed with saline, at least 50% of blood volume is lost. For the auto-transfusion machine to adequately operate, a minimum blood volume has to be washed and re-transfused. This volume is approximately 300 mL, which may mean much more than half the volume of a 20-kg patient. Children below this weight certainly will not tolerate 300 ml volume loss without receiving homologous blood 9. However, children above 20 kg may tolerate such losses. In these patients, auto-transfusion techniques may be useful. But a different problem should be raised: which is the minimum hematocrit considered "safe" for pediatric patients? Most specialized pediatric anesthesiologists do not allow hematocrit below 30%, especially in patients below 1 year of age and due to the above mentioned reasons, as opposed to adults or children above 30 kg, when values well below this may be used. However, other authors suggest using hematocrit as low as 17% in patients weighing 11 to 23 kg without tissue oxygenation problems 10. For those authors, higher losses may be tolerated without the need for homologous blood, even by patients below 20 kg 10,11. There are already auto-transfusion machines for pediatric patients, however with disadvantages still not solved by technology 12. One of these machines tried to solve the problem with lower capacity of the container for drained blood from the surgical field, allowing equipment operation with 100 mL blood. The problem is that very often the container is not totally filled and one unit of autologous blood with unpredictable quality and hematocrit is administered. Another machine is the continuous auto-transfusion equipment which has eliminated drained blood container. Drained blood is pumped to a separation chamber with capacity of up to 30 mL, while 0.9% saline solution is added for washing. This equipment allows the processing of blood volumes below 100 ml and auto-transfusion in patients below 10 kg.
In cardiac surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), part of the blood remaining in the CPB machine circuit may be re-transfused after filtration, thus decreasing the need for homologous blood 13.
A simple solution would be direct re-transfusion of drained blood from the surgical field without washing it. However, the re-transfusion of non washed blood activates the fibrinolytic system with consequent fibrinolysis and increased blood loss 14.
Von Willebrand's factor is critical in the beginning of clot formation, favoring adhesiveness of platelets to injured regions of the vascular endothelium. Desmopressin favors von Willebrand's factor release from endothelial reserves and increases glycoprotein receptors expression on platelets surface. This way, platelets adhesiveness to injured endothelial regions is increased. Normal dose is in general 0.3 µg.kg-1. Initially, it was used after cardiopulmonary bypass aiming at decreasing bleeding and improving blood coagulation. It has also been used preventively with the same purpose in major surgeries where massive losses are expected 15. Its use in adults, however, is surrounded by controversies. For pediatric patients, desmopressin also does not add any advantage 16. Not only it does not interfere with blood loss, but von Willebrand's factor dosage, in controlled studies, was the same in patients receiving or not desmopressin 17. Pediatric patients do not increase the amount of von Willebrand's factor released from reserves after receiving desmopressin 17.
it seems that this fact is related to the surgical procedure itself, the stimulation of which releases maximum von Willebrand's factor in a way that there are no extra releases with desmopressin.
Currently, antifibrinolytic agents are used preventively to decrease intraoperative bleeding in patients submitted to surgeries with CPB 18,19. Some studies have shown significant blood loss decrease when aprotinin or lysin analogs (transexamic and epsilon-amino-caproic acids) are used 20. These studies, however, were performed with adult patients submitted to cardiac surgery with CPB. During CPB, there is in fact an abnormal activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis systems. Coagulation is prevented with heparin however fibrinolysis is neglected. Since during CPB there is plasminogen activator factor stimulation, fibrinolysis is started with increased bleeding. In pediatric patients this seems to work in the opposite direction 21. The balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis is more unstable and subject to exogenous stimulation. Hemostasis in pediatric patients is not as efficient as in adults and coagulation and fibrinolysis stimulation is poorer. Before one year of age, plasma concentrations of vitamin K (II, VI and X) dependent coagulation factors, of S and C proteins and of other components (prekallikrein, kininogen, factor XI and Hageman's factor) are lower due to liver immaturity 22. In heart diseases with cyanosis there is an extra problem, typical of these patients as consequence of polycythemia, decreased number of platelets, decreased concentration of coagulation factors V, VII and VIII, and increased fibrinolysis 21. When these children are submitted to CPB they also face the disproportion between the size of the CPB machine and their weight, forcing major hemodilution and consequent coagulation factors dilution.
Aprotinin has been used in adults submitted to major surgeries and major blood losses, however with inconclusive results 23,24. In children, aprotinin and other antifibrinolytic agents which could be useful at the first sight, are controversial. Some studies have shown the inefficacy of aprotinin in pediatric patients submitted to CPB 25, while others, studying patients above 1 year of age with complex heart malformations, have used high aprotinin doses and have observed decreased intraoperative bleeding 26.
Definitely in children below 1 year of age, or in patients operated on just one time, aprotinin, even in high doses, has no benefits justifying its use 25. It has to be mentioned that all these studies have used very different doses. For pediatric cardiac surgery aprotinin dose should be calculated by body surface and not by mg/weight. In addition, aprotinin has to be added to pre-filling (prime) volume of the CPB machine to compensate hemodilution. If plasma dose is below 200 Ul.mL-1 (0.03 mg.mL-1) there will be no prevention of coagulation system contact activation. The same reasoning could be applied to other antifibrinolytic agents 27,28.
MINIMUM TRANSFUSION EXPOSURE
Minimum transfusion exposure (MTE) is an expression created to define homologous blood or its blood products coming from a minimum number of donors. This strategy would be aimed at decreasing immune problems and potentially higher infection risks when patients receive blood from a high number of donors. This technique has been widely implemented in pediatric patients with an adequate transfusion planning due to the low volumes to be transfused. Although the loss is considerable for the patient, transfused volume will be low as compared to 400 ml collection bags. Hence, it will be easy to give blood and blood products from a single donor.
CONTROLLED ARTERIAL HYPOTENSION
Intentional blood pressure decrease has been used for a long time to decrease intraoperative blood losses 29-31. Several techniques are preconized to decrease blood pressure, such as: continuous infusion of vasodilators (sodium nitroprusside, nitroglycerin) 29, beta-blockers 30, deep inhalational anesthesia levels 30,31, calcium channel blockers 32 and adenosine. None of them have support for routine use in pediatric patients, unless in older children and adolescents. Deep anesthesia may be dangerous due to myocardial depression which takes time to be reverted in case of poor results. Children below 2 years of age have cardiac output dependent on heart rate. Beta-blockers are counterindicated in this group of patients.
Induced hypotension risks are major 31, so risk/benefit ratio should be evaluated in a case-by-case basis. Ages below 2 years are a counterindication, as well as systemic diseases with vital functions involvement. As in the past, experience with techniques and familiarity with drugs to be used are critical success factors 33.
Once more it has been shown that adult solutions are not totally applicable to pediatric patients. Methods to decrease intraoperative bleeding and the need for homologous blood are effective for adults, but are by far more invasive, complicated and several of them are ineffective for pediatric patients, especially those below 2 years of age.
01. Curcio K, Souza MLM - Sangue total e derivados - conceitos e critérios de uso. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1993;43:(Supl16):1-9. [ Links ]
02. Macuco MV, Carrenho JMX, Zambonato JF - Efeito imediato da hemodiluição normovolêmica aguda pré-operatória sobre o hematócrito em pacientes adultos. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1998;48:475-484. [ Links ]
03. Miyoshi E, Carmona MJC, Uema E et al - Hemodiluição aguda perioperatória com hidroxietilamido a 6% em cirurgia cardíaca: repercussões hemodinâmicas e sobre o transporte de oxigênio. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2000;50:26-31. [ Links ]
04. Forgie MA, Wells PS, Laupacis A et al - Preoperative autologous donation decreases allogeneic transfusion but increases exposure to all red blood cell transfusion: results of a meta-analysis. International Study of Perioperative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators. Arch Intern Med, 1998;158:610-616. [ Links ]
05. Mayer MN, Montalembert M, Audat F et al - Autologous blood donation for elective surgery in children weighing 8-25 kg. Vox Sang, 1996,70:224-228. [ Links ]
06. Bryson GL, Laupacis A, Wells GA - Does acute normovolemic hemodilution reduce perioperative allogeneic transfusion? A meta-analysis. The international study of perioperative transfusion. Anesth Analg, 1998;86:9-15. [ Links ]
07. Weiskopf RB - Efficacy of acute normovolemic hemodilution assessed as a function of fraction of blood volume lost. Anesthesiology, 2001;94:439-446. [ Links ]
08. Huet C, Salmi LR, Fergusson D et al - A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cell salvage to minimize perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in cardiac and orthopedic surgery. International study of perioperative transfusion. Anesth Analg, 1999;89:861-869. [ Links ]
09. Mazzarello G, Lampugnani E, Carbone M et al - Blood saving in children. Anaesthesia 1998;53:(Suppl2):30-32. [ Links ]
10. Aly Hassan A, Lochbuehler H, Frey L et al - Global tissue oxygenation during normovolaemic haemodilution in young children. Paediatr Anaesth, 1997;7:197-204. [ Links ]
11. Booke M, Van Aken H - What is the minimum weight required to effectively perform intraoperative autotransfusion in small children - an in vitro investigation. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2001; 29:74-77. [ Links ]
12. Booke M, Hagemann O, Van Aken H et al - Intraoperative autotransfusion in small children: an in vitro investigation to study its feasibility. Anesth Analg, 1999;88:763-765. [ Links ]
13. Friesen RH, Tornabene MA, Coleman SP - Blood conservation during cardiac surgery: ultrafiltration of the extracorporeal circuit volume after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg, 1993;77:702-707. [ Links ]
14. Riou B, Arock M, Guerrero M et al - Haematological effects of postoperative autotransfusion in spinal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1994;38:336-341. [ Links ]
15. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force: Practice Guidelines for Blood Component Therapy. Anesthesiology, 1996;84:732-747. [ Links ]
16. Lethagen S - Desmopressin - a haemostatic drug: state-of-the-art review. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 1997;14:(Suppl14): 1-9. [ Links ]
17. Laupacis A, Fergusson D - Drugs to minimize perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analyses using perioperative blood transfusion as the outcome. The international study of perioperative transfusion investigation. Anesth Analg, 1997;85:1258-1267. [ Links ]
18. Pereira JCD, Auler Jr JOC - Antifibrinolíticos em cirurgia cardíaca. Estado atual. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1994;44:205-210. [ Links ]
19. Levi M, Cromheecke ME, de Jonge E et al - Pharmacological strategies to decrease excessive blood loss in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of clinically relevants endpoints. Lancet, 1999;354:1940-1947. [ Links ]
20. Dalmau A, Sabate A, Acosta F et al - Tranesaxamic acid reduces red cell transfusion better than epsilon-aminocaproic acid or placebo in liver transplantation. Anesth Analg, 2000;91:29-34. [ Links ]
21. Reid RW, Burrows FA, Hickey P - Anesthesia for Children Undergoing Heart Surgery, em: Coté CJ, Ryan JF, Todres ID et al - A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children, 3rd Ed, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company, 2001;391-413. [ Links ]
22. Andrew M, Paes B, Johnston M - Development of the hemostatic system in the neonate and young infant. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 1990;12:95-104. [ Links ]
23. Soilleux H, Gillon MC, Mirand A et al - Comparative effects of small and large aprotinin doses on bleeding during orthotopic liver transplantation. Anesth Analg, 1995;80:349-352. [ Links ]
24. Porte RJ, Molenaar IQ, Begliomini B et al - Aprotinin and transfusion requirements in orthotopic liver transplantation: a multicentre randomised double-blind study. Lancet, 2000;355:1303-1309. [ Links ]
25. Davies MJ, Allen A, Kort H et al - Prospective, randomised, double-blind study of high-dose aprotinin in pediatric cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg, 1997;63:497-503. [ Links ]
26. Carrel TP, Schwanda M, Vogt PR et al - Aprotinin in pediatric cardiac operations: a benefit in complex malformations and with high-dose regimen only. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998;66:153-158. [ Links ]
27. Williams GD, Bratton SL, Riley EC et al - Efficacy of epsilon-aminocaproic acid in children undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1999;13:304-308. [ Links ]
28. Reid RW, Zimmerman AA, Laussen PC et al - The efficacy of tranexamic acid versus placebo in decreasing blood loss in pediatric patients undergoing repeat cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg, 1997;84:990-996. [ Links ]
29. Grando TA, Puricelli E, Chiao IU et al - Hipotensão induzida e controlada pelo halotano e nitroprussiato de sódio na cirurgia ortognática. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1990;40:325-330. [ Links ]
30. Vieira JL, Katayama M - Hipotensão induzida com bloqueadores alfa e beta1 e halogenados: comparação entre enflurano, halotano e isoflurano em rinoplastias. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1992;42:201-206. [ Links ]
31. Grando TA, Puricelli E, Ishiguro RM et al - Avaliação do risco de complicações em duas técnicas de hipotensão controlada em cirurgi ortognática. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1996;46:1-7. [ Links ]
32. Tobias JD, Hersey S. Mencio GA et al - Nicardipine for controlled hypotension during spinal surgery. J Pediatric Orthop, 1996;16:370-373. [ Links ]
33. Eckenhoff JE - Deliberate hypotension. Anesthesiology, 1978;48:87-88. [ Links ]
Dr. Mário José da Conceição
Rua Germano Wendhausen, 32/401
88015-460 Florianópolis, SC
Apresentado (Submitted) em 14 de
abril de 2003
Aceito (Accepted) para publicação em 01 de julho de 2003
* Recebido do (Received from) Serviço de Anestesiologia do Hospital Infantil Joana de Gusmão - CET integrado da SES-SC - Florianópolis