SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.57 issue5Anesthesia and the long QT syndromePain evaluation in neonatology author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links


Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia

Print version ISSN 0034-7094On-line version ISSN 1806-907X

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.57 no.5 Campinas Sept./Oct. 2007 



Antifibrinolytics and cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass*


Antifibrinolíticos y cirugía cardíaca con circulación extracorpórea



Ari-Tadeu Lírio dos Santos, TSAI; João Carlos Splettstosser, TSAII; Paulo WarpechowskiIII; Mariana Mariz Pinto GaidzinskiIV

IMestre em Ciências da Saúde pelo IC/FUC; Co-Responsável pelo CET/SBA do SANE
IIInstrutor do CET/SBA do SANE
IIIAnestesiologista do SANE

Correspondence to




BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiac surgery is the surgical subspecialty most often associated with bleeding, bleeding disorders, and the need of blood products. Agents such as aprotinin, episilon-aminocaproic acid, and tranexamic acid are frequently used to aid the hemostasis of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. The objective of this report is to present the physiopathology of bleeding during cardiac surgeries and the current role of antifibrinolytics regarding their efficacy and complications when used in those procedures, with emphasis on tranexamic acid and aprotinin.
CONTENTS: The mechanisms of changes in hemostasis caused by cardiopulmonary bypass, how antifibrinolytics decrease bleeding, and the use of alogenic blood in cardiac surgery are discussed. A review of the literature emphasizes the thromboembolism secondary to the use of those antifibrinolytics.
CONCLUSION: Fibrinolysis is one of the main factors related with increased bleeding during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Inhibition of fibrinolysis associated with the preservation of platelet function is, probably, the mechanism by which anti-fibrinolytics decrease bleeding. Those agents reduce bleeding in up to 50% in cardiac surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass. Tranexamic acid and episilon-aminocaproic acid are safer than aprotinin in the prevention of thromboembolism.

Key Words: BLOOD: coagulation; DRUGS, Antifibrinolytic agents: aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acids, tranexamic acid; SURGERY, Cardiac: cardiopulmonary bypass.


JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: La cirugía cardiaca es la especialidad quirúrgica que más frecuentemente está asociada al sangramiento, cuagulopatía y con necesidad de derivados de sangre. Los agentes farmacológicos aprotinina, ácido epsilon-aminocapróico y el ácido tranexámico son los más utilizados para auxiliar en la hemostasia de los pacientes sometidos a la circulación extracorpórea. El objetivo de este trabajo fue presentar la fisiopatología del sangramiento en cirugía cardiaca y la actual situación de los antifibrinolíticos en cuanto a su eficacia y complicaciones cuando usados en estos procedimientos dando más énfasis al ácido tranexámico y a la aprotinina.
CONTENIDO: Son discutidos los mecanismos por los cuales la circulación extracorpórea provoca alteración en la hemostasia y de que manera los antifibrinolíticos actúan para disminuir el sangramiento y el uso de sangre alogénica en cirugía cardiaca. Se le da énfasis al problema del trombo embolismo que puede ocurrir con el uso de esos antifibrinolíticos, con revisión de la literatura.
CONCLUSIONES: La fibrinólisis es uno de los principales factores relacionados con el aumento del sangramiento en cirugía cardiaca con circulación extracorpórea. La inhibición de la fibrinólisis, conjuntamente con la preservación de la función plaquetaria es probablemente el mecanismo por el cual los antifibrinolíticos disminuyen el sangramiento. El uso de esos fármacos reduce el sangramiento en cirugía cardiaca con circulación extracorpórea en un porcentaje que puede alcanzar el 50%. Con relación a la preocupación con el trombo embolismo, el ácido tranexámico y el ácido epsilon-aminocapróico son opciones que ofrecen una mayor seguridad que la aprotinina.




Excessive bleeding is still a serious complication in cardiac surgeries. When it happens, it can increase morbidity and mortality. Besides, bleeding and reintervention increase treatment costs. The consumption of blood components and blood products is increased, as well as the length of surgery, besides increasing the length of admission in postoperative units and in the hospital. Although the frequency and criteria for blood transfusions are not uniform among different cardiac surgery departments, approximately 60% to 75% of patients receive blood transfusion 1,2. Reintervention due to bleeding in those types of procedures ranges between 2% and 6%, with a mortality rate of 10% to 22% 3,4.

The most frequent causes of hemorrhage include inadequate surgical hemostasia or change in hemostasis as a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

For the reasons mentioned above, several strategies have been developed to avoid excessive bleeding and to decrease the number of transfusions.

Those strategies can be divided in pharmacological and non-pharmacological. Among the pharmacological strategies, the antifibrinolytics tranexamic acid (TA), epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), and aprotinin are used and studied more often. Autologous preoperative blood donation, recovery of red blood cells by intraoperative centrifugation, and normovolemic dilution are non-pharmacologic strategies used most often.



Normal hemostatic response includes three phases: primary hemostasis, clotting, and fibrinolysis. Primary hemostasis, which depends primarily on platelets and their interaction with the blood vessel, begins shortly after vascular rupture, forming a platelet plug and temporarily stopping bleeding. Clotting strengthens this friable plug with production of fibrin. This process takes up to 4 hours and stops bleeding while the blood vessel is healing. Fibrinolysis, which occurs after 24 hours, removes the clot and allows the restoration of blood flow in the affected vascular segment.

Clotting forms a fibrin net that stabilizes the platelet plug. This phase is didactically divided in two pathways: intrinsic pathway, or pathway of the contact factor, and the extrinsic pathway, or pathway of the tissue factor (TF) (Figure 1). The rigid division in two pathways is not that important anymore because there are several factors that participate in both pathways. It is important to note that, in vitro, activation of coagulation can occur by any one of those pathways. The extrinsic pathway is activated when the TF is exposed by the vascular lesion 5, and the participation of factors V and X, occurs in the common or final pathway of the coagulation cascade, whose objective the formation of thrombin (Figure 1).

It is accepted, nowadays, that clotting begins when the TF is exposed to the intravascular space after lesion of the endothelium or by the release of cytokines. This factor binds activated factor VII (FVIIa), which corresponds to 1% of the total amount of circulating factor VII. The complex TF-FVIIa activates factor X (FXa) and factor IX (FIXa). Activated factor X then activates factor V (FVa). These two factors also form a complex whose final result is the formation of a small amount of thrombin which, in turn, is capable to activate platelets, factor VIII, factor V, and factor XI. The surface of the activated platelet is the place where the complex FVIIIa-FIXa activates factor X with an efficacy 50 times greater than the complex TF-FVIIa. Activated factor FXa binds FVa in another area of the platelet surface, forming the prothrombinase complex that is capable of forming large amounts of thrombin from FXa 6. Thrombin converts fibrinogen in fibrin, promotes platelet activation, and activates factor XIII, responsible for fibrin polymerization, which makes the clot more resistant.

Besides this mechanism, called extrinsic pathway, which triggers coagulation in response to trauma, another pathway also activates coagulation, and involves factor XII, high-molecular weight kininogens, pre-kallikrein, and factor XI, followed by the activation of factor IX. The importance of this pathway is not completely understood, since factor XII deficiency does not cause changes in coagulation. On the contrary, factor XI deficiency could cause moderate bleeding 7. According to Roberts et al. 6, factor XI deficiency causes changes in coagulation, which have little clinical importance.

Coagulation should be controlled in order to remain restricted to the area of vascular lesion.

Several mechanisms prevent disseminated coagulation. Since blood remains in the form of a liquid, despite intense stimulus, as can be seen in polytraumatized patients, it demonstrates that these mechanisms are effective. The antithrombin III system (ATIII) is the most important of them. Heparin potentiates the actions of ATIII. In the absence of ATIII, heparin does not have anticoagulation activity, and plasma should be administered to the patient.

Fibrinolysis is the process that destroys thrombi. Plasminogen and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), a protease that transforms plasminogen in plasmin, participate in this process. Since it is a wide-spectrum proteolytic enzyme, plasmin digests fibrin, fibrinogen, and most coagulation factors and co-factors 8. Fibrin is stabilized by the formation of cross links stimulated by factor XIII. Lysis of the clot before cross links are formed, originates fibrin and fibrinogen degradation products (FDP). Lysis of the clot after fibrin stabilization originates D-dimers.



When blood circulates within the cardiovascular system, it is always in contact with a continuous layer of endothelium, capable of maintaining it in liquid form. The endothelium is extremely important for the hemostatic system because it participates in all three phases of hemostasis 9. Endothelial cells release factors that control platelet activation and inhibition, clotting, and fibrinolysis.

During cardiopulmonary bypass, blood is in contact with artificial surfaces, measuring approximately 12 m2, that form the CPB system. The lining material of oxygenators, filters, lines, and other components of the system, derives from chemical compounds, such as polyvinyl chloride, silicon, polyurethane, polycarbonate, and polyesterene 10. Despite attempts to improve the biocompatibility of those materials, this system still activates blood cells, leading to the release of TF.

Until recently, artificial CPB surfaces were considered the greatest stimulus for thrombin formation. Currently, evidence indicates that tissue lesion is more important. The extrinsic pathway is activated whenever blood is in contact with the pericardium and damaged tissues rich in TF 11-13. For this reason, Tabuchi et al. 14 recommended that, whenever possible, blood accumulated in the pericardium should neither be aspirated nor mixed with circulating perfusate. This blood should be washed and concentrated, allowing only red blood cells to return to the circulation, except in critical bleeding situations. Another alternative is the addition of antibodies against TF or administration of the inhibitor of the TF pathway directly in the blood that accumulates in the pericardium, to avoid the activation of the intrinsic pathway 15.

The intrinsic pathways probably do not promote the formation of thrombin in vivo, but whenever blood gets in contact with CPB materials, the process of thrombin formation is activated 16.

Heparin is not the ideal anticoagulant to be used during CPB because it does not prevent completely the formation of thrombin. Kojima et al. 17 demonstrated that during CPB the levels of thrombin are elevated. It is important to stress that fibrin is formed, and consequently fibrinolysis is present, whenever thrombin is activated. Besides converting fibrinogen in fibrin, thrombin is a potent platelet activator by causing a conformational change in the platelet receptor IIb/IIIa, allowing fibrinogen to bind to this place, with consequent platelet aggregation and release of ADP and serotonin, and induction of the synthesis of prostaglandins and formation of thromboxane A2 18. Thrombin also activates factors V, VIII, and XI 19, promoting the formation of more thrombin and activation of factor XIII 20.

Another effect of thrombin that occurs in the third phase of hemostasis is the release of t-PA, produced by the endothelium, with conversion of plasminogen in plasmin and consequent activation of the fibrinolytic system. Plasmin degrades fibrin, forming FDP and D-dimers. Fibrinogen degradation products inhibit platelet aggregation, probably by binding to the platelet receptor GPIIb/IIIa, which is important for platelet aggregation (Figure 2) 21. Fibrinogen degradation products have other actions that favor anticoagulation, such as degradation of factors V and VIII and interference with fibrin polymerization, i.e., interferes with the formation of cross links stimulated by factor XIII 22.

Evidence indicates that besides its action on fibrin, plasmin causes changes in platelet receptors, especially glycoprotein Ib-IX, the main receptor of the von Willebrand 23 factor, leading to the destruction of factors V and VIII 24.

Cardiopulmonary bypass induces changes in the complex fibrinolysis system, because it promotes imbalances between t-PA and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Initially, fibrinolysis predominates, which might be followed by a tendency for thrombosis. This explains the theoretical risk of postoperative thrombotic complications after CPB.

The heparin used during CPB participates in the changes in platelet function that occur in this period. Platelets are activated by heparin, with an increase in its aggregation capacity. Activated platelets form macroaggregates and disappear rapidly from the circulation, explaining the reduction in platelet number that is seen during CPB 25. Besides, heparin causes changes in platelet function by inducing a temporary refractoriness to ADP stimulus 26.

The CPB system, through its rollers, filters, aspirators, oxygenator, and other components of the perfusion equipment, causes mechanical lesions of the platelets, therefore contributing to the altered hemostasis.



Pharmacological strategies with antifibrinolytics to reduce bleeding in cardiac surgeries take into consideration the changes in hemostasis caused by CPB and the mechanism of action of the drugs.

Until the middle of the decade of 1980, pharmacological strategies used more often to reduce surgical bleeding consisted of desmopressin and prostacyclins, which were not very effective 27-29.

Antifibrinolytics inhibit fibrinolysis and, consequently, prevent or reduce the formation of FDP, which have deleterious effects on platelet function. Besides, they also decrease the conversion of plasminogen in plasmin that has proteolytic actions on platelet receptors.

Currently, three antifibrinolytic agents are used more often. Aprotinin, a wide spectrum inhibitor of serum proteases, and two analogs of the amino acid lysine, EACA and TA, that inhibit fibrinolysis. In most studies, those drugs cause a 30% to 50% reduction in bleeding.



Aprotinin is a wide spectrum polypeptide that inhibits serum proteases, isolated from bovine lungs. Its efficacy is related to its wide spectrum. It inhibits several plasma proteases: plasmin, serum and tissue kallikrein, trypsin, and urokinase 30. Its antifibrinolytic action is related with the inhibition of plasmin. The inhibition of proteases seems to be dose-dependent 31. It is currently the pharmacological strategy used more often to decrease bleeding in cardiac surgeries after ECC.

In vitro studies show that a serum concentration of 125 KIU (kallikrein inhibitor units).mL-1 inhibits more than 90% of plasmin activity. To inhibit kallikrein it is necessary a serum concentration of 300-500 KIU.mL-1 32. Aprotinin is eliminated by the kidneys. In 4 hours, 80% of the drug has already been eliminated.

The use of aprotinin as a blood-sparing drug has been demonstrated in several clinical studies, with random distribution of patients, and 3 meta-analyses 33-35. It has been demonstrated that aprotinin is effective in reducing bleeding and blood transfusions in cardiac surgeries with CPB, even in patients with increased risk of bleeding 36-38.

Aprotinin is used, mostly, in high doses, as established by Roystron et al. 36 at the Hammersmith Hospital. Since its elimination half-life is between 1 and 7 hours, the recommended regimen consists of an initial dose of 2 x 106 KIU (2,000,000 KIU), followed by the same dose in the CPB, and continuous infusion of 5 x 105 KIU.h-1 during surgery. Several studies demonstrated that this regimen reduces blood loss by up to 50% and the need of transfusion in 40% to 80% of the cases of cardiac surgery with CPB 39-42.

Besides this regimen, the one used more often and that has been studied the most, regimens with lower doses have been used. The initial administration is 1x106 KIU, similar dose at CPB, and continuous infusion of 2.5 x 105 KIU during surgery. Studies have demonstrated that this dose decreases the loss of blood and the need of blood transfusion 43-46.

The high cost of aprotinin is one of the problems that hinder its use. Besides, it has a higher incidence of allergic reaction than synthetic antifibrinolytics 47. Pinosky et al. alerted that the repeated use of aprotinin may cause anaphylactic reaction in 5% to 6% of the patients 48. The prevalence of allergic reactions during the first exposure is lower. In the work of Levy et al. with 287 patients, 215 received this drug, and the incidence of allergic reaction was of 0.5%. This reaction was characterized by cutaneous reaction restricted to the thorax and neck, without hemodynamic changes 49.

Aprotinin accumulates in the renal tubules, raising the concern of renal complications. In animal studies, the administration of aprotinin caused a reduction in glomerular filtration, renal plasma flow, and excretion of sodium and potassium 50. The actions of aprotinin in renal function are complex and cause important changes in human kidneys 51.



Tranexamic acid (TA), along with EACA, belongs to the group of antifibrinolytics derived from lysine. The structural formula of those synthetic antifibrinolytics is similar (Figure 3).



Figure 4




Tranexamic acid is 6 to 10 times more potent than EACA 52. It has more affinity for plasminogen, its antifibrinolytic activity is more sustained, and it has a longer duration. The volume of distribution of this drug varies from 9 to 12 liters, and the elimination half-life is approximately 2 hours 53. After intravenous administration, only 3% bind to proteins. More than 95% of the drug are eliminated in the urine 54; therefore, the dose should be reduced in patients with renal failure.

Several recent, comparative, clinical studies between TA and aprotinin failed to show any differences in postoperative bleeding and transfusion of alogenic blood 55-58.

As for EACA, several studies have also demonstrated a reduction in bleeding after cardiac surgery with CPB 59-61. In comparative studies with TA and EACA, TA had better results 48,62.

The dose of TA used prophylactically to prevent excessive bleeding in cardiac surgeries with CPB varies among the different institutions. The doses vary between a single dose of 150 to an initial dose of up to 10 followed by the infusion of 1 The larger prospective, double-blind study that compared 5 different doses, undertaken by Horrow et al. 63, demonstrated that an initial dose of 10 followed by the infusion of 1, is the most adequate. This dose provides serum levels above 10 µ, enough to suppress fibrinolytic activity 64. In a recent study by Fischer et al. 65, the dose described maintained adequate levels ( 10 µg.mL-1). This administration regimen was questioned by a preliminary study by Dowd et al. 66, who measured serum levels of TA during CPB. The administration of 10 of TA followed by the infusion of 1 did not maintain therapeutic levels in isolated moments of CPB. The study by Karski et al. 67 also questioned the dose used. They compared three groups with doses of 50, 100, and 150, administered 20 minutes before CPB. Bleeding was significantly greater in the group that received 50

When the administration is instituted also influences the results. In two studies that demonstrated that TA did not reduce bleeding in cardiac surgeries with CPB by Filipescu et al. 68 and Ævrum et al. 69 this methodological matter must have been important. Tranexamic acid was not instituted after the incision of the skin, which hindered its efficacy. Soslau 70 compared two groups, one in which TA was started before the incision of the skin and the other after CPB. Bleeding and serum levels of FDP were greater in the second group.

Besides the dose and when the administration is instituted, another variable is the duration of the administration. Casati et al. 71 demonstrated that prolonging the infusion of TA beyond the surgery does not add advantages regarding bleeding or the number of homologous transfusions. The explanation is based on the elimination half-life of TA of 80 minutes. Approximately 30% of the drug appear in the urine in 1 hour, and 45% in the following 2 hours, and 90% are eliminated in 24 hours. Therefore, the amount administered during surgery is enough for the immediate postoperative period, when the stimulus that leads to changes in hemostasis is over. Treatment with TA increases the precipitation of fibrin, and can cause thrombosis and decrease renal function in patients with glomerular disease. The use of this drug is potentially dangerous in patients with glomerulonephritis or nephrotic syndrome, being able to trigger renal failure by intratubular fibrin precipitation. In theory, TA can also potentiate the problem in patients with hematuria in the upper urinary tract because it prevents the dissolution of the clots by urokinase. These clots can obstruct the urinary tract 72.

The topic administration of TA in the central nervous system, in humans and animals, has been related with seizures 73,74. However, this observation has not been reported in clinical studies and meta-analysis of cardiac surgeries. We found only one study in humans, by Couto et al. 75, that reported a possible correlation between TA and seizures, because one patient in the TA group developed seizures.

The antifibrinolytic activity is due to the formation of reversible complexes with plasminogen. Tranexamic acid and EACA block almost completely the interaction of t-PA, plasminogen, and the fibrin monomer due to the high affinity for binding places on the lysine in the plasminogen 76. This process inhibits or delays fibrinolysis because, although plasmin is formed, it cannot bind to fibrin.



Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), similar to TA, is a competitive inhibitor of plasminogen activation. It has been used in different doses and regimens. The dose recommended, and used, in most cases varies from 100-150, intravenous, followed by the infusion of 10-15 mg.kg1 during the surgery. Serum levels of 70 to 75 µg.mL-1 inhibit fibrinolysis in 50%, and blood levels around 130 µg.mL-1 have the maximal effect 77. It has a redistribution of 10 to 25 minutes and an elimination half-life of 1 to 3 hours. Most of the drug is eliminated by the kidneys, and about 35% is metabolized in the liver 78.

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid has a small, synthetic molecule, assuring a very small risk of allergic reaction. The most frequent side effect is hypotension, which is usually associated with fast administration 79.



One of the main concerns about the use of antifibrinolytics in myocardial revascularization with CPB is the risk of obstruction of the coronary grafts and myocardial infarction (MI). Suppression of fibrinolysis without reduction in thrombin formation can, in theory, lead to hypercoagulability and, consequently, MI.

Aprotinin is the antifibrinolytic drug studied the most. The use of low doses has been questioned for a long time. Currently, this regimen is not recommended due to the concern of thromboembolic complications 80. The use of aprotinin, even in the high doses regimen, has been questioned regarding the increase in thromboembolic complications. In the multicenter study, IMAGE 81, sponsored by the manufacturer of aprotinin, with 870 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization, occlusion of the graft of saphenous vein was greater in the aprotinin group. The incidence of graft occlusion in the aprotinin group was 15.4% and 10.9% in the placebo group (p = 0.03). After a questionable statistical analysis, adjusted for risk factors of saphenous graft occlusion, that included among the factors analyzed even the possible use of blood with aprotinin to preserve the graft, the relationship decreased. The percentage rate in the aprotinin group ended up as being 1.7%, and in the placebo group it was 1,09%. The authors stated that aprotinin can affect the permeability of grafts with vessels whose diameter is below 1.5 mm or in patients with compromised distal vascular bed, which is very common nowadays with the change in the population undergoing this procedure, due to the increase in the frequency of therapeutic hemodynamic interventions that treat less severe cases.

The meta-analysis by Laupacis et al., 5,808 patients of clinical studies with random distribution of patients, comparing groups that received aprotinin with placebo groups, showed a tendency, which was not statistically significant, for a greater incidence of MI in the group treated with aprotinin 34.

In another meta-analysis, undertaken in 1999, with 72 clinical studies with random distribution of 8,409 patients, the authors demonstrated that the frequency of MI was twice as high in patients who received conventional (high) doses of aprotinin than those who received low doses, and this difference was statistically significant. When patients who received aprotinin (regardless of the dose) were compared with the placebo group, the incidence of MI was greater in the aprotinin group, but this difference was not statistically significant. However, despite of this tendency, in-hospital mortality in this meta-analysis was always lower in the aprotinin group. Comparing patients who received aprotinin, regardless of the dose, with the placebo group, the in-hospital mortality was twice as high in the placebo group 82. It is important to stress that the scientific value of the mortality evaluation would be higher if the follow-up were not restricted to the hospitalization period.

The study by Cosgrove et al. demonstrated a tendency for a higher prevalence of MI in patients treated with aprotinin who underwent myocardial revascularization 83. Heparin was administered to maintain the PTT above 400 seconds, and it is now known that aprotinin prolongs, artificially, the PTT activated with celite. In this study, the justification for the higher incidence of MI observed in the aprotinin group was inadequate anticoagulation. The dose of heparin was lower than usual, and it would have caused greater formation of fibrin, with an increase in the consumption of coagulation factors and reduction in platelet function, according to the mechanisms explained before.

In a recent study with 4,374 patients with worldwide repercussion, which also originated a recommendation in the site of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Mangano et al. 51 demonstrated that the use of aprotinin is associated with renal lesion, MI, heart failure, and strokes, contrasting with the use of TA and EACA, which are recommended as less expensive and safer alternatives. These drugs are not associated with increased risk of renal, cardiac, or cerebral events.

Due to its cost, which makes the routine use of aprotinin in cardiac surgeries with CPB impracticable, sensitization with the possibility of an allergic reaction on future exposures, and the risk of thromboembolic and renal complications, the interest for TA and EACA has increased, since the reduction in postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgeries is not different among those drugs.

Fibrinolysis is related to changes in hemostasis that occur during CPB. To detect the severity of fibrinolysis, the dosage of D-dimers, specific to measure fibrinolysis, is one of the tests used most often 53,84,85; it quantifies the lysis of fibrin with cross-links. Elevated serum levels of D-dimers reflect and increase in the lysis of fibrin, i.e., increased fibrinolysis. In a recent study with patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, the concentration of D-dimers was significantly lower in the group that received TA, demonstrating reduced fibrinolytic activity, when compared with the placebo group 86.

The thromboelastograph, easy and fast to use, is another way of measuring fibrinolysis after CPB 87.

As mentioned before, the risk of MI is one of the main concerns about the use of antifibrinolytics. Suppression of fibrinolysis without reducing the formation of thrombin can, in theory, lead to a hypercoagulable state; however, studies with TA have not demonstrated increased risk or tendency of thromboembolic complications, such as MI.

In the meta-analysis by Laupacis et al. 34 of 12 studies with 882 patients, the prevalence of MI was 0.4% in the TA group and 1.8% in the control group. In another meta-analysis, undertaken by Levi et al. 35, comparing TA and EACA together, as lysine analogues, to placebo, demonstrated a tendency for decreased prevalence of MI in the group treated with lysine analogues than in the placebo group.



The risk of MI did not increase with the use of antifibrinolytics and lysine analogues (TA and EACA), according to several studies and meta-analysis. However, fibrinolysis and bleeding decreased significantly, demonstrating that the use of those drugs is safe and beneficial to patients undergoing cardiac surgeries with CPB. The routine use of these antifibrinolytics can be recommended for their low cost and safety.



01. Øvrum E, Am Holen E, Abdelnoor M, et al. — Conventional blood conservation tecniques in 500 consecutive coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg, 1991;52:500-505.        [ Links ]

02. Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Sapsford RN et al. — Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high dose aprotinin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1989;97:364-372.        [ Links ]

03. DelRossi AJ, Cernaianu AC, Botros S et al. — Prophylatic treatment of postperfusion bleeding using EACA. Chest, 1989;96:27-30.        [ Links ]

04. Salzman EW, Weinstein MJ, Weintraub RM et al. — Treatment with desmopressin acetate to reduce blood loss after cardic surgery. A double-blind randomized trial. N Engl J Med, 1986; 314:402-406.        [ Links ]

05. Carson SD, Brozna JP — The role of tissue factor in the production of thrombin. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 1993;4:282-492.        [ Links ]

06. Roberts HR, Monroe DM, Escobar MA — Current concepts of hemostasis. Anesthesiology, 2004;100:722-730.        [ Links ]

07. Dahlback B — Blood coagulation and its regulation by anticoagulant pathways: genetic pathogenesis of bleeding and thrombotic diseases. J Intern Med, 2005,57:209-223.        [ Links ]

08. Thorsen S — Differences in the binding to fibrin of native plasminogen and plasminogen modified by proteolytic degradation. Influence of omega-aminocarboxylic acids. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1995;393:55-56.        [ Links ]

09. Pearson JD — The control of production and release of haemostatic factors in the endothelial cell. Ballieres Clin Haematol, 1995;90:244-248.        [ Links ]

10. Pereira JCD, Auler JOC — Antifibrinolíticos em cirurgia cardíaca: estado atual. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1994;44:205-210.        [ Links ]

11. Boisclair MD, Lane DA, Philippou H et al. — Mechanisms of thrombin generation during surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood, 1993;82:3350-3357.        [ Links ]

12. de Haan J, Boonstra PW, Monnink SH et al. — Retransfusion of suctioned blood during cardiopulmonary bypass impairs hemostasis. Ann Thorac Surg, 1995;59:901-907.        [ Links ]

13. Philipou H, Davidson SJ, Mole MT et al. — Two chain factor VIIa generated in the pericardium during surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: relationship to increase thrombin generation and heparin concentration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 1999;19:248-254.        [ Links ]

14. Tabuchi N, Haan J, Boonstra PW et al. — Activation of fibrinolysis in the pericardial cavity during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1993;106:828-833.        [ Links ]

15. Chung JH, Gikakis N, Rao K et al. — Pericardial blood activates the extrinsic coagulation pathway during clinical cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation, 1996;93:2014-2018.        [ Links ]

16. Cohn LH, Edmunds LH — Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2003;338-348.        [ Links ]

17. Kojima T, Gando S, Kemmotsu O et al. — Another point of view on the mechanism of thrombin generation during cardiopulmonary bypass: role of tissue factor pathway inhibitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2001;15:60-64.        [ Links ]

18. Harker LA — Bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass. N Engl J Med, 1986;314:1446-1448.        [ Links ]

19. Bouma BN, von dem Borne PA, Meijers JCM — Fator XI protection of the fibrin clot against lysis — A role for the intrinsic pathway of coagulation in fibrinolysis. Thromb Haemost, 1998;80:24-27.        [ Links ]

20. Despostis GJ, Joist JH — Anticoagulation and anticoagulation reversal with cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass: un update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1999;13:18-29.        [ Links ]

21. Coller BS — Platelets and thrombolytic therapy. N Eng J Med, 1990;322:33-42.        [ Links ]

22. Bucur SZ, Levy JH, Despotis G et al. — Use of antithrombin III in congenital and adquired deficiency states. Transfusion, 1998; 38:481-498.        [ Links ]

23. Adelman B, Michelson AD, Loscalzo J — Plasmin effect on platelet glycoprotein Ib-von Willebrand factor interactions. Blood, 1985; 65:32-40.        [ Links ]

24. Spiess BD — The contribution of fibrinolysis to postbypass bleeding. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1991;5:13-17.        [ Links ]

25. Murithi EW, Belcher PR, Rao JN et al. — The effects of heparin and extracorporeal circulation on platelets counts and platelet microaggregation during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2000;120:538-43.        [ Links ]

26. Hines RL, Rinder C — Perioperative Coagulopathy: cardiac surgery, em: Lake CL, Moore RA — Blood: Hemostasis, Transfusion and Alternatives in the Perioperative Period. New York: Raven, 1995;465-481.        [ Links ]

27. Salzman EW, Weinstein MJ, Weintraub RM et al. — Treatment with desmopressin acetate to reduce blood loss after cardiac surgery: a double-blind randomized trial. N Engl J Med, 1986; 314:1402-1406.        [ Links ]

28. Rocha E, Llorens R, Paramo JA et al. — Does desmopressin acetate reduce blood loss after surgery in patients on cardiopulmonary bypass? Circulation, 1988;77:1319-1323.        [ Links ]

29. Fish KJ, Sarnquist FH, van Steennis C et al. — A prospective randomized study of the effects of prostacyclin on platelet and blood loss during coronary bypass operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1986;91:436-442.        [ Links ]

30. Royston D — High-dose aprotinin therapy: a review of the first five years' experience. J Cardiothorac Anesth, 1992;6:76-100.        [ Links ]

31. Royston D — Aprotinin versus lysine analogues: the debate continues. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998;65:S9-S19.        [ Links ]

32. HoffmannH, Siebeck M, Thetter O et al. — Aprotinin concentrations effective for the inhibition of tissue kalikrein and plasma kalikrein in vitro and in vivo. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1998;247B:35-42.        [ Links ]

33. Fremes SE, Wong BI, Lee E et al. — Meta-analysis of prophylatic drug treatment in the prevention of postoperative bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg, 1994;58:1580-1588.        [ Links ]

34. Laupacis A, Fergusson D — Drugs to minimize perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analysis using perioperative blood transfusion as the outcome. Anesth Analg, 1997;85:1258-1267.        [ Links ]

35. Levi M, Cromheecke EM, Jonge et al. — Pharmacological strategies to decrease excessive blood loss in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of clinically relevant endpoints. Lancet, 1999;354:1940-1948        [ Links ]

36. Royston D, Bidstrup BP, Taylor KM et al. — Effect of aprotinin on the need for blood transfusion after repeat open heart surgery. Lancet 1987;2:1289-1291.        [ Links ]

37. Dietrich W, Spannagl M, Jochum M et al. — Influence of high-dose aprotinin treatment on blood loss and coagulation patterns in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Anesthesiology, 1990;73:119-126.        [ Links ]

38. Harder MP, Eijsman L, Roozendaal et al. — Aprotinin reduces intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in membrane oxygenator cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg, 1991;51: 936-941.        [ Links ]

39. Blauhut B, Gross C, Necek S — Effects of high-dose aprotinin on blood loss, platelet function, fibrinolysis, complement, and renal function after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1991;101:958-967.        [ Links ]

40. Havel M, Teufelsbauer H, Knobl P et al. — Effect of intraoperative aprotinin administration on postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1991;101:968-972.        [ Links ]

41. Lemmer JH, Stanford W, Bonney SL et al. — Aprotinin for coronary bypass surgery; efficacy, safety, and influence on early saphenous vein graft patency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1994; 107:543-453.        [ Links ]

42. Marx G, Pokar H, Reuter H et al. — The effects of aprotinin on hemostatic function during cardiac surgery. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth, 1991;5:467-474.        [ Links ]

43. Carrel T, Bauer E, Laske A et al. — Low-dose aprotinin also allows for reduction of blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1991;102:801-802.        [ Links ]

44. Schonberger JP, Everts PA, Ercan H et al. — Low-dose aprotinin in internal mammary artery bypass operations contributes to important blood saving. Ann Thorac Surg, 1992;54:1172-1176        [ Links ]

45. Kawasuji M, Ueyama K, Sakakibara N et al. — Effect of low-dose of aprotinin on coagulation and fibrinolysis in cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg, 1993;55:1205-1209.        [ Links ]

46. Isetta C, Samat C, Jourdan I et al. — Aprotinin treatment in cardiac surgery: low-doses versus high doses. Anesthesiology, 1992; 77:A139.        [ Links ]

47. Mannucci PM — Hemostatic drugs. N Engl J Med, 1998;339:245-253.        [ Links ]

48. Pinosky ML, Kennedy DJ, Fishman RL et al. — Tranexamic acid reduces bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass when compared to epsilon aminocaproic acid and placebo. J Card Surg, 1997;12:330-338.        [ Links ]

49. Levy JH, Pifarre R, Shaff HV et al. — A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin for reducing blood loss and the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation, 1995; 92:2236-2244.        [ Links ]

50. D'Ambra MN, Risk SC — Aprotinin, erythropoietin and blood substitutes. Int Anesthesiol Clin, 1990;28:237-240.        [ Links ]

51. Mangano DT, Tudor IT, Dietzel C — The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med, 2006;354:353-365.        [ Links ]

52. Levy JH — Hemostatic agents and their safety. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1999;13(Suppl 1):6-11.        [ Links ]

53. Franck M, Sladen RN — Drugs to prevent and reverse anticoagulation. Anesthesiol Clin North Am, 1999;17:799-811.        [ Links ]

54. Horrow JC, Hlavacek J, Strong MD et al. — Tranexamic acid decreases bleeding after cardiac operations. J Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:70-74.        [ Links ]

55. Casati V, Guzzon D, Oppizzi M et al. — Tranexamic acid compared with high-dose aprotinin in primary elective heart operations: effects on perioperative bleeding and allogenic transfusions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2000;120:520-527.        [ Links ]

56. Wong BI, McLean RF, Fremes SE et al. — Aprotinin and tranexamic acid for high transfusion risk cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000;69:808-816.        [ Links ]

57. Pugh SC, Wielogorski AK — A comparison of the effects of tranexamic acid and low-dose of aprotinin on blood loss and homologous blood usage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesth, 1995;9:240-244.        [ Links ]

58. Bernet F, Carrel T, Marbet G et al. — Reduction of blood loss and transfusion requirements after coronary artery bypass grafting: similar efficacy of tranexamic acid and aprotinin in aspirin-treated patients. J Card Surg 1999;14:92-7.        [ Links ]

59. Del Rossi AJ, Cernaianu AC, Botros S et al. — Prophylatic treatment of postperfusion bleeging using EACA. Chest, 1989;96:27-30.        [ Links ]

60. Arom KV, Emery RW — Decrease posoperative drainage with addition of å-aminocaproic acid before cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg, 1994;57:1108-1113.        [ Links ]

61. Daily PO, Lamphere JE, Dembiski WP et al. — Effect of prophylatic epsilon-aminocaproic acid on blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting. A randomized, prospective, double-blind study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1994;108:99-108.        [ Links ]

62. Hardy JF, Bélisle S, Dupont C et al. — Prophylatic tranexamic and e-aminocaproic acid for primary myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998;65:371-376.        [ Links ]

63. Horrow JC, Van Riper DF, Strong MD et al. — The dose response relationship of tranexamic acid. Anesthesiology, 1995;82:383-392.        [ Links ]

64. Andersson L, Nilsoon IM, Collen S et al. — Role of urokinase and tissue activator in sustaining bleeding and the management thereof with EACA and AMCA. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1968;28:642-658.        [ Links ]

65. Fiechtner BK, Nuttal GA, Johnson ME et al. — Plasma tranexamic acid concentrations during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg, 2001;92:1131-1136.        [ Links ]

66. Dowd N, Karski J, Cheng DCH et al. — Pharmacokinetics of tranexamic acid during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg, 1999;88:SCA 112.        [ Links ]

67. Karski JM, Dowd NP, Joiner R et al. — The effect of three different doses of tranexamic acid on blood loss after cardiac surgery with mild systemic hypothermia (32 degrees C). J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesth, 1998;12:642-646.        [ Links ]

68. Filipescu D, Giurgiman L, Bubenek S et al. — No benefit of tranexamic acid on blood transfusion requirements in primary cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth, 1999;82:31.        [ Links ]

69. Øvrum E, Am Holen E, Abdelnoor M et al. — Tranexamic acid is not necessary to reduce blood loss after coronary artery bypass operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1993;105:78-83.        [ Links ]

70. Soslau G, Horrow J, Brodsky I — Effect of tranexamic acid on platelet ADP during extracorporeal circulation. Am J Hematol, 1991;38:113-119.        [ Links ]

71. Casati V, Bellotti F, Gerli C et al. — Tranexamic acid administration after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Anesthesiology, 2001; 94:8-14.        [ Links ]

72. Sagripanti A, Sarteschi LM, Camici M et al. — Non-tranfusional haemostatic agents in the management of bleeding disorders. Intern Med, 2001;9:10-18.        [ Links ]

73. Pellegrini A, Giaretta D, Chemello R et al. — Feline generalized epilepsy induced by tranexamic acid. Epilepsia 1982;23:35-45.        [ Links ]

74. Schlag MG, Hopt R, Redi H — Convulsive seizures following subdural application of fibrin sealant containing tranexamic acid in a rat model. Neurosurgery, 2000;47:1463-1467.        [ Links ]

75. Couto WJ, Gregori F, Cordeiro CO et al. — Emprego do ácido tranexâmico para controle de sangramento em cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica. Arq Bras Cardiol,1994;63:485-487.        [ Links ]

76. Hoylaerts M, Lijnen HR, Col.len D — Studies on the mechanism of the antifibrinolytic action of tranexamic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1981;18:75-85.        [ Links ]

77. Bennet-Guerrero E, Sorohan JG, Canada AT et al. — e-Aminocaproic acid plasma levels during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg, 1997;85:248-251.        [ Links ]

78. Mahdy AM, Webster NR — Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents. Br J Anaesth, 2004;93:842-858        [ Links ]

79. Maslow A, Schwartz C — Cardiopulmonary bypass-associated coagulopathies and prophylatic therapy. Int Anesthesiol Clin, 2004;42:103-133.        [ Links ]

80. Smith PK, Muhlbaier LH — Aprotinin: safe and effective only with the full dose regimen. Ann Thorac Surgery, 1996;621575-1577.        [ Links ]

81. Alderman EL, Levy JH, Rich JB et al. — Analyses of coronary graft patency after aprotinin use; results from the International Multicenter Aprotinin Graft Patency Experience (IMAGE) Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1998;116:716-730.        [ Links ]

82. Levi M, Cromheecke EM, Jonge E et al. — Pharmacological strategies to decrease excessive blood loss in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of clinically relevant endpoints. Lancet, 1999; 354:1940-1948.        [ Links ]

83. Cosgrove DM 3rd, Heric B, Lytle BW et al. — Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg, 1992;54:1031-1038.        [ Links ]

84. Greenberg CS, Devine DV, McCrae KM — Measurement of plasma fibrin D-dimer levels with the use of monoclonal antibody coupled to latex beads. Am J Clin Pathol, 1987;87:94-100.        [ Links ]

85. Shore-Lesserson L, Reich DL, Vela-Cantos F et al. — Tranexamic acid reduces transfusion and mediastinal drainage in repeated cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg, 1996;83:18-26.        [ Links ]

86. Santos ATL, Kalil RA, Bauermann C et al. — A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study with tranexamic acido f bleeding and fibrinolytic activity after primary coronary artery bypass grafting. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2006;39:63-69.        [ Links ]

87. Maia PV, Araújo GZ, Faria MD — Tromboelastógrafo em cirurgia cardíaca: estado atual. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2006;56:78-88.        [ Links ]



Correspondence to:
Unidade de Pesquisa do IC/FUC
Dr. Ari-Tadeu L. Santos
Av. Princesa Isabel, 370, Santana
90620-001 Porto Alegre, RS

Submitted em 21 de agosto de 2006
Accepted para publicação em 22 de junho de 2007



* Received from Serviço de Cirurgia Cardiovascular do Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul/Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC)

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License