SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.59 issue1IndexationEphedrine versus phenylephrine: prevention of hypotension during spinal block for cesarean section and effects on the fetus author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia

Print version ISSN 0034-7094

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.59 no.1 Campinas Jan./Feb. 2009

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942009000100002 

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE

 

50% enantiomeric excess hyperbaric bupivacaine (S75:R25) for infraumbilical surgeries. Study with different volumes*

 

Mezcla con exceso enantiomérico de 50% de bupivacaína (S75:R25) hiperbárica para procedimientos quirúrgicos infraumbilicales. Estudio con diferentes volúmenes

 

 

Luiz Eduardo Imbelloni, TSA, M.D.I; José Antônio Cordeiro, M.D.II

IDiretor do Instituto de Anestesia Regional, Hospital de Base; Anestesiologista do Hospital São Bernardo e Casa de Saúde Santa Maria, Rio de Janeiro, RJ
IIProfessor Livre-Docente em Probabilidade e Estatística da Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, SP

Correspondence to

 

 


SUMMARY

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hyperbaric bupivacaine is commercially available in its racemic form. In Brazil, 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (S75:R25) was introduced as an isobaric presentation. The objective of this study was to evaluate different volumes of hyperbaric S75:R25 bupivacaine in spinal blocks for infraumbilical surgeries.
METHODS: Forty patients, ages 20 to 60 years, physical status ASA I and II, scheduled for infraumbilical surgeries under spinal block participated in this study. Patients were randomly divided in four groups of 10 patients: Group 2.5 received 2.5 ml of the solution (10 mg), Group 3 — 3 ml (12 mg), Group 4 — 4 ml (16 mg), and Group 5 — 5 ml (20 mg). The following parameters were evaluated and compared: latency, cephalad dispersion, motor blockade, cardiovascular changes, and neurologic complications.
RESULTS: The study showed a latency of 1:33 ± 0:26 (min:sec) without significant differences among the different doses. Motor blockade was dose-dependent. The incidence of bradycardia or hypotension was related with the increase in the dose. Anesthetic failures were not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: 0.4% hyperbaric 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (S75:R25) with D5W provided fast onset of the blockade and the level of sensitive and motor blockades as well as the duration of the blockade were dose-dependent.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, Regional: subarachnoid; ANESTHETICS, Local: 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine.


RESUMEN

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: La bupivacaína hiperbárica comercialmente utilizada se presenta como forma racémica. En Brasil, la bupivacaína en exceso enantiomérico de 50% (S75:R25) fue lanzada solo en forma isobárica. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la bupivacaína S75:R25 hiperbárica en diferentes volúmenes para la anestesia raquídea en procedimientos quirúrgicos infraumbilicales.
MÉTODO: Participaran en el estudio 40 pacientes con edades entre los 20 y los 60 años, estado físico ASA I y II, programados para procedimientos quirúrgicos infraumbilicales, bajo anestesia raquídea. Los pacientes fueron aleatoriamente separados en cuatro grupos de 10 pacientes: Grupo 2,5 - recibió 2,5 mL de la solución (10 mg), Grupo 3 - 3 mL (12 mg), Grupo 4 - 4 mL (16 mg) y Grupo 5 - 5 mL (20 mg). Se evaluaron y compararon los siguientes parámetros: latencia, dispersión cefálica, bloqueo motor, alteraciones cardiovasculares y complicaciones neurológicas.
RESULTADOS: La latencia fue de 1:33 ± 0:26 minutos sin diferencia significativa entre las dosis utilizadas. Hubo una correlación entre la dispersión del bloqueo y el volumen utilizado. El bloqueo motor fue dosis dependiente. La incidencia de bradicardia o de hipotensión arterial fue correlacionada con el aumento de la dosis. No se registraron fallas.
CONCLUSIÓNES: La bupivacaína 0,4% hiperbárica en exceso enantiomérico de 50% (S75:R25) con glucosa a 5% proporcionó un rápido inicio de instalación, con un nivel del bloqueo sensitivo, del bloqueo motor y de la duración del bloqueo dosis dependiente.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Bupivacaine is commercially available as a racemic mixture of R(+) and S(-) enantiomers and it was first used in spinal blocks in concentrations of 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1%, with or without epinephrine 1. Due to the quality of its anesthesia and long duration of action, it still is one of the most used anesthetics. Separation of racemic bupivacaine allows the production of the levorotatory and dextrorotatory enantiomers. Levobupivacaine can be used as the pure enantiomer 2 or in the proportion of 25% R(+) plus 75% S(-), known as "50% enantiomeric excess mixture". It was introduced in Brazil to be used in spinal blocks in the concentration of 0.5% and only in its isobaric form.

Spinal blocks can be achieved with low doses of local anesthetics with a reduced risk of toxicity. Amide anesthetics are regularly used in spinal blocks, and bupivacaine has fast onset and long duration of action. Pure 0.5% bupivacaine (racemic) produces sensitive and motor blockades similar to that of enantiomeric excess (S75:R25) isobaric bupivacaine when used in spinal blocks for orthopedic procedures 3. The specific gravity of local anesthetics is one of the most important factors influencing their distribution in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 4. S75:R25 isobaric bupivacaine was used in spinal blocks in adults 3 and children 5 with excellent results; however, the hyperbaric solution of S75:R25 has not been tested yet.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of analgesia, dispersion, and regression of different volumes of 0.4% S75:R25 hyperbaric bupivacaine with D5W in spinal blocks for infraumbilical surgeries.

 

METHODS

After approval by the Publication Committee of the Hospital and Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Base Funfarme and signing of the informed consent, 40 patients, physical status ASA I and II, ages 20 to 60 years, weighing 60 to 80 kg, 1.60 to 1.80 m tall, of both genders, scheduled for spinal block for infraumbilical surgeries participated of this prospective study. Exclusion criteria were hypovolemia, coagulopathies, infection, and refusal to undergo this method of anesthesia. Patients did not receive pre-anesthetic medication. Ringer's lactate was administered after venoclysis with an 18G catheter for hydration, volume expansion, and administration of drugs.

Patients were randomly divided using coded envelopes prepared especially for the study. Enantiomeric excess (S75: R25) 4% hyperbaric bupivacaine (specific gravity of 1.0107 g.mL-1 at 37°C) with D5W was prepared using 0.5% isobaric S75:R25 bupivacaine (specific gravity of 1.0058 g.mL-1 at 37°) and 1 mL of hypertonic glucose solution at 25%. Patients were randomly divided in four groups of 10 patients according to the dose of 0.4% hyperbaric S75:R25 bupivacaine as follows: Group 2.5 — patients received 10 mg (2.5 mL, Group 3 — 12 mg (3 mL), Group 4 — 16 mg (4 mL), and Group 5 20 mg (5 mL).

The spinal block was initiated after sedation with fentanyl (50 to 100 µg). The skin was cleaned with alcoholic chlorhexedine solution and the excess was removed. After infiltration of the skin with 1% lidocaine, the subarachnoid puncture was performed in the L3-L4 space, with the patient in left lateral decubitus, using the median approach, with a 27G Quincke needle (B. Braun Melsungen) without introducer. After the backflow of CSF confirmed the proper position of the needle, 2.5, 3, 4, or 5 mL of 4% hyperbaric S75:R25 bupivacaine were administered at a rate of 2 mL.15seg-1. After evaluation of the parameters, patients received 1 to 2 mg of midazolam for sedation.

Quality of anesthesia was determined (loss of sensitivity with a blunted-tip needle) bilaterally for up to 15 minutes. Motor blockade of the lower limbs was determined at the same time using the Bromage scale6. The onset of the blockade was defined as the time between the injection and loss of sensitivity in the dermatome corresponding to puncture (L3 — anterior aspect of the thigh). The time between the puncture and complete recovery of sensitive and motor activities was considered the duration of the blockade. In case of failure, the procedure would be repeated before beginning the surgery and other anesthetic (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine) would be administered. In case of any intraoperative failures (insufficient level or duration), the technique would be reverted to general anesthesia. The presence of post-puncture headache was evaluated in all patients up to the 5th postoperative day, as well as transitory neurologic symptoms (TNS) or other neurologic complications. Patients were followed up to the 30th postoperative day.

Blood pressure, heart rate, and SpO2 were evaluated every five minutes, and the ECG was monitored continuously at CM5. Hypotension was defined as a 30% reduction in baseline systolic pressure and it was treated with vasopressor (2 mg of etilefrine). A reduction in heart rate below 50 bpm was treated with atropine. All patients received supplemental oxygen (2 to 4 L.min-1) via a Hudson mask. A urinary catheter was not used.

Analysis of Variance was used to analyze quantitative parameters. Mood test for medians was used to analyze the level of sensitivity and motor blockade. Demographic data, bradycardia, hypotension, failures, and headache were analyzed by the Fisher Exact test. A level of significance α = 0.05 was adopted. It was assumed that 30 minutes, with a standard deviation of 15 minutes, was the maximal difference in the duration of analgesia, and using ANOVA to compare the means to a classification criteria of four levels, and a power of 0.80 to perceive this difference, it was considered that seven patients per group would be required. Ten patients were included in each group achieving, therefore, a posteriori power of 1.0 (type II error 0) for a maximal difference of one hour and 19 minutes and standard deviation of 15 minutes.

 

RESULTS

Forty patients, 30 males and 10 females, participated in this study. Groups did not differ in age, weight, and height (Table I). Complementation with general anesthesia was not necessary in any patient.

 

 

The onset of analgesia was fast and comparable among the different groups (Table II). Groups did not show significant differences in the onset of sensitive blockade, which was defined as the latency (Table II). There was evidence of differences in the duration of the blockade in the different groups, demonstrated by increased duration with the increase in dose (2.5 mL 3 mL < 4 mL < 5 mL) (Table II). The development of bradycardia or hypotension demonstrated a significant correlation with the increase in dose (p = 0.019, Fisher Exact test). The incidence of failure was not significantly different among the four groups (p = 1.0 Fisher Exact test) and the same applies to the incidence of headache (p = 1.0 Fisher Exact test) (Table II). Transitory neurologic symptoms and severe neurologic complications were not observed.

 

 

Dispersion of analgesia at 15 minutes was different among the four groups (p < 0.0005). The sensitivitylevel evaluated by the Mood test for medians was lower in the 2.5 mL Group, which was lower than in the 3 mL Group, which in turn was lower than in the 4 mL Group and this one was similar to the 5 mL Group (Figure 1).

 

 

Table III shows the different degrees of motor blockade. A progressive increase in the degree of motor blockade was observed with an increase in the dose (2.5 mL < 3 mL < 4 mL 5 mL) (p < 0.0005).

 

 

The combined standard deviation for the duration of analgesia was 15 minutes, and 1 hour and 18 minutes was the maximal difference among means. With the parameters and sample used, this study had a power of 99%.

 

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrated that different volumes of 0.4% hyperbaric S75:R25 bupivacaine with D5W can be used for spinal blocks for infraumbilical surgeries with similar onset of action, and with increased duration and incidence of complications with an increase in the dose.

The choice of anesthetic solution depends on availability. Different drugs are evaluated in different countries, depending on local regulations and commercial factors. Only the isobaric form of 0.5% S75:R25 bupivacaine was introduced in the market. For this reason, the study protocol associated 1 mL of 0.5% isobaric S75:R25 bupivacaine with dextrose 25% in water, resulting in a solution with a lower concentration (0.4%). The calculated specific gravity showed hyperbaric behavior in all patients.

Hyperbaric bupivacaine is obtained by the addition of glucose; the addition of D5W and D10W were tested, and the 8% concentration showed less variation in the extension of the blockade. The use of 0.75% bupivacaine in dextrose 8% in water did not show advantages over the 0.5% concentration 7. Between 2 and 4 mL, the increase in volume did not produce any change in dispersion, but produced an increase in the duration of action, which is related with the increase in the dose. In children, hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.9% or 8% glucose in water produced similarly successful spinal block, cephalad dispersion of the blockade, recovery, and side effects 8, demonstrating that high concentrations of glucose are not necessary to make a hyperbaric anesthetic solution. In this study with 0.4% hyperbaric S75:R25 bupivacaine with D5W in volumes varying from 2.5 to 5 mL, the cephalad dispersion as well as the increase in the duration of action were observed with higher doses.

There are several reasons why one should control the level of maximal sensitive blockade. The level of maximal sensitive blockade results from the injection of the local anesthetic in the subarachnoid space which is determined by the cephalad distribution of the local anesthetic in the CSF and its absorption by the nerve tissue. The dispersion of hyperbaric bupivacaine is related with age, and the level is higher in older patients 9 because age is associated with a progressive reduction in the volume of CSF. This is one of the reasons why the study protocol with S75:R25 bupivacaine limited patient participation to those between 20 and 60 years of age. Anyway, an increase in cephalad dispersion was observed with an increase in the dose, which was not age-related.

A study comparing racemic (S50:R50) and enantiomeric excess (S75:R25) bupivacaine did not detect differences in the time of onset of the sensitive blockade, which was 1.78 ± 0.73 min 3. In the present study that used different volumes of S75:R25 bupivacaine, a difference in the time of onset of the sensitive blockade, equal to 1:33 ± 0:26 (min:sec), was not observed among the groups. The duration of the blockade with both solutions was approximately 5 hours, without significant differences 3. A significant increase in the duration of the blockade was observed with the increase in the dose of 0.4% hyperbaric S75:R25 bupivacaine.

The motor blockade is dose-dependent and it is more frequent with pure aqueous solutions 10. In the present study, it was observed that the incidence of motor blockade was lower with low doses (2.5 and 3 mL) than with high doses (4 and 5 mL), reinforcing the notion that this is a dose-dependent effect. Complete motor blockade was seen only with higher doses.

Hypotension during spinal block is correlated with the dispersion of the sensitive blockade, prior hydration, and age of the patient. In the present study, the incidence of hypotension was higher when the dose of S75:R25 hyperbaric bupivacaine was increased.

The addition of D5W to S75:R25 bupivacaine demonstrated, as did other authors 8, that high concentrations of glucose are not necessary to turn local anesthetics into hyperbaric solutions. Similarly, the reduction in the concentration of S75:R25 bupivacaine to 0.4% showed the same results as those of other studies with hyperbaric bupivacaine. To conclude, 0.4% S75:R25 hyperbaric bupivacaine with D5W showed fast onset of action and the level of the sensitive blockade, motor blockade, and duration of the blockade were dose-dependent. The present study demonstrated that S75:R25 bupivacaine with lower concentration can be produced (0.4% represents a 20% savings) and the concentration of glucose added to local anesthetics can be reduced to 5%.

 

REFERENCES

01. Ekblom L, Widman B — LAC-43 and tetracaine in spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1966;23(Suppl):419-421.         [ Links ]

02. Simonetti MPB — Manipulação da relação enantiomérica da bupivacaína. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1999;49:416-418.         [ Links ]

03. Imbelloni LE, Beato L — Comparação entre bupivacaína racêmica (S50-R50) e mistura enantiomérico de bupivacaína (S75-R25), ambas isobáricas, a 0,5% em raquianestesia. Estudo em cirurgias ortopédicas. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2001;51:369-376.         [ Links ]

04. Greene NM — Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subaracnoid space. Anesth Analg, 1985;64:715-730.         [ Links ]

05. Imbelloni LE, Vieira EM, Beato L et al. — Raquianestesia com a mistura enantiomérico de bupivacaína a 0,5% isobárica (S75-R25) em crianças com idades de 1 a 5 anos para cirurgia ambulatorial. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2002;52:286-293.         [ Links ]

06. Bromage PR — A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1965;(Suppl XVI):55-69.         [ Links ]

07. Chambers WA, Scott DB — Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine: effect of added vasoconstrictors. Anesth Analg, 1982;61:49-52.         [ Links ]

08. Kokki H, Hendolin H — No difference between bupivacaine in 0.9% and 8% glucose for spinal anaesthesia in small children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000;44:548-551.         [ Links ]

09. Imbelloni LE, Sobral MGC — Influência da idade na anestesia subaracnóidea com bupivacaína 0,5% hiperbárica. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 1990;40:415-419.         [ Links ]

10. Imbelloni LE — O uso racional da raquianestesia, em: Imbelloni LE Tratado de Anestesia Raquidiana. Curitiba, Medidática Informática, 2001;79.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Dr. Luiz Eduardo Imbelloni
Av. Epitácio Pessoa, 2.356/203 — Lagoa
22411-072 Rio de Janeiro, RJ
E-mail: dr.imbelloni@terra.com.br

Submitted em 26 de fevereiro de 2007
Accepted para publicação em 21 de outubro de 2008

 

 

* Received from Instituto de Anestesia Regional, Hospital de Base, São José do Rio Preto, SP