Services on Demand
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Print version ISSN 0034-7094
On-line version ISSN 1806-907X
Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.59 no.2 Campinas Mar./Apr. 2009
Learning curve for the ultrasound anatomy of the brachial plexus in the axillary region*
Curva de aprendizaje de la sonoanatomía del plexo braquial en la región axilar
Pablo Escovedo Helayel, TSAI; Diogo Bruggeman da ConceiçãoII; Bruno S. NascimentoIII; Anderson KohlerIII; Gustavo Luchi BoosII; Getúlio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho, TSAIV
Instrutor Co-Responsável do CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da SES-SC,
Coordenador e Pesquisador do Nepar do CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da
IIAnestesiologista; Pesquisador do Nepar do CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da SES-SC
IIIME do CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da SES-SC
IVAnestesiologista; Doutor em Anestesiologia; Responsável do CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da SES-SC; Pesquisador do Nepar do CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da SES-SC
OBJECTIVES: Proficiency in ultrasound-guided blocks demands four skills:
recognition of the ultrasound anatomy, capacity to generate images, aligning
the needle with the ultrasound beam, and recognizing the dispersion of the local
anesthetic. The objective of this study was to construct and evaluate learning
curves for image generation and ultrasound identification of the neurovascular
structures in the axilla.
METHODS: Seven Anesthesiology residents received theoretical and practical notions on the basic principles of ultrasound and the ultrasound anatomy of the axillary region with the objective to identify the terminal branches of the brachial plexus and axillary vessels. Each resident performed six exams. The accuracy and the time to identify the structures were evaluated. The success rate of each exam was calculated. Simple linear regression evaluated the time necessary to identify each structure in relation to the number of the exam.
RESULTS: The axillary vessels were identified in 100% of the exams. The median nerve was identified in 83% of the cases from the first to the fifth exams. The radial nerve was identified in 100% of the exams. The ulnar nerve was identified in 67% of the cases in the first exam, and in 83% of the cases from the second to the fifth exams. The musculocutaneous nerve was identified in 50% of the cases in the first exam and in 83% of the cases in the fourth and fifth exams. All structures were identified correctly on the sixth exam. The mean time for the correct identification of the structures decreased considerably from the first to the sixth exam (r = - 0.37).
CONCLUSIONS: Learning progression required the memorization of the ultrasound anatomy of the axillary region and acquisition of manual ability, and increasing success rates were associated with a significant reduction in the time to identify the structures.
Key Words: ANESTHESIA, Regional; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, Regional; EQUIPMENT, Ultrasound
Y OBJETIVOS: El desempeño en bloqueos guiados por ultrasonido exige
cuatro habilidades: reconocimiento de la Sonoanatomía, capacidad de generación
de imágenes, alineación de la aguja al haz ultrasonográfico
y reconocimiento de la dispersión del anestésico local. El objetivo
de este estudio fue construir y evaluar curvas de aprendizaje de la generación
de imágenes e identificación ultrasonográfica de las estructuras
MÉTODO: Siete médicos en especialización en Anestesiología recibieron nociones teóricas y prácticas sobre principios básicos de la ultrasonografía y sonoanatomía axilar, para identificar ramas terminales del plexo braquial y vasos axilares. Cada ME realizó seis exámenes. Fueron evaluados la exactitud y el tiempo transcurrido para la identificación de las estructuras. Se calcularon las tasas de éxito en cada examen. La regresión lineal simple evaluó el tiempo para la identificación de cada estructura con relación al número del examen.
RESULTADOS: Los vasos axilares fueron identificados en 100% de los exámenes. El nervio mediano fue identificado en un 83% de los exámenes entre el primero y el quinto. El nervio radial fue identificado en 100% de los exámenes. El nervio cubital fue identificado en un 67% de los casos en el primer examen y en un 83% de los casos del segundo al quinto procedimiento. El nervio musculocutáneo fue identificado en un 50% de los casos en el primer examen, en un 83% en el cuarto y en el quinto exámenes. Todas las estructuras fueron correctamente identificadas en el sexto examen. El tiempo promedio para la identificación de las estructuras se redujo significativamente entre el primer y el sexto examen (r = - 0,37).
CONCLUSIONES: La memorización sonoanatómica axilar y la adquisición de habilidad manual de examen ultrasonográfico, fueron obligatorias para la progresión del aprendizaje y para que las tasas de éxito crecientes se asociasen con una reducción significativa del tiempo para la identificación de las estructuras.
Ultrasound guided nerve blocks represent a new paradigm in regional blocks 1,2. Through the direct visualization of the nerves and adjacent structures, the ultrasound allows better distribution of the anesthetic around the nerve, increasing the success rate and decreasing the incidence of complications 3,4. The ultrasound has proved to be an invaluable teaching tool in regional blocks for anesthesiology residents 5. However, to acquire proficiency in ultrasound-guided blocks, one should fulfill four fundamental requirements: recognize the ultrasound anatomy, have the capacity to generate high-quality images, align the needle to the ultrasound beam, and recognize the adequate pattern of dispersion of the local anesthetic 6,7.
The objective of this study was to construct and evaluate the learning curve for image generation and ultrasound identification of the neurovascular structures in the axillary region.
After approval by the Ethics on Research Committee of the Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, an exam group composed by seven volunteers from the Anesthesiology residency program was formed. The group included 3 third-year (ME3), 2 second-year (ME2), and 2 first-year (ME1) residents; none of them had prior ultrasound experience. Forty-eight hours before beginning the study all participants received a review article on ultrasound-guided regional block describing basic ultrasound principles (image generation, exam technique, and equipment settings) and illustrating the ultrasound anatomy of the brachial plexus and vascular structures of the axilla 8. Immediately before beginning the series of exams all participants received individual instructions from an anesthesiologist (with experience of more than 500 ultrasound-guided blocks) on how to handle the device to optimize the images. This was followed by the demonstration of the ultrasound anatomy of the axillary region, emphasizing the characteristics of the following structures: axillary artery and vein, and median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves (Figure 1). Images were generated and stored on the hard drive of an ultrasound machine (Sonoace 8000 SE®, Medison, South Korea) equipped with a linear, broad-band transducer (5 to 10 MHz). For the study, the residents who were going to be examined were placed in dorsal decubitus with the arm in 90° abduction, the forearm at a 90° flexion and in external rotation so the back of the hand touched the table and the forearm was parallel to the axis of the body. After applying the ultrasound gel on the skin, the transducer was placed on the axillary region to generate a transversal image. In all exams the examiner was holding the transducer with the non-dominant hand and facing the ultrasound equipment to prepare the resident for the recommended technique for ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. For three days, each resident examined and had his axillary region examined six times to identify the terminal branches of the axillary plexus and axillary vessels. The accuracy of the identification of each structure and the length of time between the beginning of the exam and the identification of each structure were evaluated. The contact of the transducer with the skin was established as moment zero in order to evaluate the duration of the exam, which was done simultaneously with the evaluation of the resident by the instructor. The end of the exam was characterized by the identification of the last neurovascular structure of the axillary region or when the resident gave up. Success rates were calculated for each exam. Simple linear regression evaluated the identification time for each structure per exam.
The axillary artery and vein were identified in 100% of the cases in all exams. The median nerve was identified in 83% of the exams from the first to the fifth (Figure 2). The radial nerve was identified in 100% of the cases from the second exam on (Figure 3). The ulnar nerve was identified in 67% of the cases in the first exam and in 83% of the cases from the second to the fifth exam (Figure 4). The musculocutaneous nerve was identified in 50% of the cases in the first exam, in 67% of the second and third exams, and in 83% in the fourth and fifth exams (Figure 5). All structures were identified correctly in 100% of the sixth exam. The mean time to identify the structures decreased significantly between the first and sixth exams (r = - 0.37).
The teaching of ultrasound-guided regional blocks should be divided in steps, as follows: recognition of the ultrasound anatomy and image generation in the first step followed by the alignment of the needle in relation to the ultrasound beam, and recognition of the proper pattern of dispersion of the local anesthetic 6,7,9. To succeed in obtaining images of the brachial plexus, besides the knowledge of the ultrasound anatomy of the region, one also should acquire some abilities regarding the generation and interpretation of ultrasound images. The knowledge of the normal ultrasound anatomy depends on the memorization of the ultrasound characteristics of each nerve and vascular structure and the position pattern of each one in the region being visualized. The acquisition of visual and motor coordination is essential to produce manual movements capable of generating images with an acceptable recognition pattern. Manual motor coordination is composed by three basic transducer movements: sliding, inclination, and rotation. The combination of those three movements allows for the optimization of the characteristics of the image generated. Anisotropy is a form of tissue attenuation caused by irregularities on the surface of a peripheral nerve or its path, changing the incidence and reflection of the ultrasound waves from a 90° angle in relation to the structure being examined10. This causes a reduction in the energy returning to the transducer, decreasing the intensity of the echo and nerve visualization. Through small adjustments in transducer inclination, it is possible to get closer to the ideal ultrasound beam inclination and obtain adequate nerve visualization 11. Other factors that hinder proper recognition of peripheral nerves in the axillary region include the great mobility and variability in its position in relation to the axillary artery 12. Thus, the pressure of the transducer on the arm can dislocate neighboring peripheral nerves, bringing them close together and making their individualization difficult; the variable position of those nerves can also be a source of difficulty by modifying the anatomic relationships in the region.
It was possible to demonstrate that achieving proficiency on complex abilities of transducer handling and recognition (memorization) of the axillary ultrasound anatomy demanded a greater number of exams. According to other studies 7,13, those results demonstrate that the speed to acquire manual abilities to generate ultrasound images depended on the individual ability of each resident. However, despite this individual variability in learning and its complexity, a fast progression on the acquisition of manual abilities and recognition of the ultrasound anatomy was observed in all volunteers, who reached adequate proficiency level at the end of a six-exam session. In this study, the musculocutaneous nerve was the most difficult to identify. In the axillary region it is located in a septum between the biceps and coracobrachial muscles, has a hyperechoic pattern, and four different shapes along its trajectory 14, what might have hindered its identification in the initial exams. However, since the median and ulnar nerves are more superficial, hypoechoic, and do not show wide variability in shape, they were more easily identified. In the axilla, the radial nerve is located, most of the times, posteromedial or posterolateral to the axillary artery 12. Thus, its identification could be hindered by the increased image gain (artifact) generated by the ultrasound equipment on the posterior aspect of the artery along with the excessive brightness of the muscular septum of the triceps muscle 15. Despite it all, this nerve was identified correctly in 100% of the cases from the second exam on, probably due to the reduced variation in position than the remainder terminal branches of the brachial plexus 12, facilitating its recognition by memorizing its anatomic relationships. The anechoic pattern of vascular structures, associated with the pulsation of the axillary artery and collapsibility of axillary veins by the transducer facilitated their identification. Peripheral nerves do not share those favorable mechanical and echo characteristics of axillary vascular structures, making their visualization more challenging technically. Thus, the rate of identification of the axillary vessels was higher in a lower number of exams and in shorter time than the terminal branches of the brachial plexus.
This study demonstrated that memorization of the ultrasound anatomy of the axilla and the acquisition of manual ability in ultrasound examination were mandatory for progression of learning and increasing success rates, which were quickly associated with a significant reduction in the time necessary for the correct identification of axillary structures.
01. Helayel PE, Conceição DB, Oliveira Filho GR - Bloqueios nervosos guiados por ultrassom. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2007;57:106-123. [ Links ]
02. Brull R, Perlas A, Chan VW - Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2007;11:25-32. [ Links ]
03. Sites BD, Beach ML, Spence BC et al. - Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2006;50:678-684. [ Links ]
04. Chan VW, Perlas A, McCartney CJ et al. - Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Can J Anaesth, 2007;54:176-182. [ Links ]
05. Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R et al. - Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anaesth, 2003;50:1047-1050. [ Links ]
06. Oliveira Filho GR, Helayel PE, Conceicao DB et al. - Learning curves and mathematical models for interventional ultrasound basic skills. Anesth Analg, 2008;106:568-573. [ Links ]
07. Sites BD, Gallagher JD, Cravero J et al. - The learning curve associated with a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional task by inexperienced anesthesia residents. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2004;29:544-548. [ Links ]
08. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S - Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth, 2005;94:7-17. [ Links ]
09. Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher JD et al. - Characterizing novice behavior associated with learning ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2007;32:107-115. [ Links ]
10. Aldrich JE - Basic physics of ultrasound imaging. Crit Care Med, 2007;35:S131-137. [ Links ]
11. Soong J, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Gray AT - The importance of transducer angle to ultrasound visibility of the femoral nerve. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005;30:505. [ Links ]
12. Conceição DB, Helayel PE, Carvalho FAE et al. - Imagens ultrassonográficas do plexo braquial na região axilar. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2007;57:684-689. [ Links ]
13. Gracias VH, Frankel HL, Gupta R et al. - Defining the learning curve for the Focused Abdominal Sonogram for Trauma (FAST) examination: implications for credentialing. Am Surg, 2001;67: 364-368. [ Links ]
14. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Gray AT - The musculocutaneous nerve: ultrasound appearance for peripheral nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2005;30:385-390. [ Links ]
15. Sites BD, Brull R, Chan VW et al. - Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part II: a pictorial approach to understanding and avoidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2007;32:419-433. [ Links ]
Correspondence to: Submitted em 16
de maio de 2008 *
Received from do Hospital Governador Celso Ramos - CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia
da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de Santa Catarina (SES-SC), Núcleo
de Ensino e Pesquisa em Anestesia Regional (Nepar), Florianópolis, SC
Dr. Pablo Escovedo Helayel
Av. Governador Irineu Bornhausen, 3440/204 - Agronômica
88025-200 Florianópolis, SC
Accepted para publicação em 17 de novembro de 2008
Submitted em 16
de maio de 2008
* Received from do Hospital Governador Celso Ramos - CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de Santa Catarina (SES-SC), Núcleo de Ensino e Pesquisa em Anestesia Regional (Nepar), Florianópolis, SC