Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Influence of local anesthetics on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium: effects of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine on the neuromuscular junction

Abstracts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The effects of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular transmission and their influence on the neuromuscular blockade produced by competitive neuromuscular blockers have not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the effects of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (S75-R25) on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium. METHODS: The rats were divided in five groups (n = 5) according to the drug used: isolated lidocaine, bupivacaine (S75-R25), or rocuronium (groups I, II, and II); and rocuronium in preparations previously exposed to LAs (groups IV and V). The concentrations used were as follows: 20 µg.mL-1, 5 µg.mL-1, and 4 µg.mL-1 of lidocaine, bupivacaine (S75-R25), and rocuronium, respectively. The following parameters were evaluated: 1) the strength of muscular contraction of the diaphragm to indirect electrical stimulations, before and 60 minutes after the isolated addition of the LAs and rocuronium, and the association AL-rocuronium; and 2) the effects of LAs on membrane potential (MP) and miniature end-plate potentials (MEPP). The effect of LAs on muscle contraction in response to acetylcholine was evaluated in chick biventer cervicis preparations. RESULTS: Isolated lidocaine and bupivacaine (S75-R25) did not change the muscular response and the levels of MPs. In preparations exposed to LAs, rocuroniuminduced blockade was significantly greater than that produced by rocuronium alone. In chick biventer cervicis preparations, lidocaine and bupivacaine (S75R25) decreased contraction in response to acetylcholine. Lidocaine increased the frequency of MEPPs, which was followed by the blockade; bupivacaine (S75R25) caused a reduction in MEPPs followed by blockade. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetics caused a potentiation of the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium. The results showed pre- and post-synaptic effects.

ANESTHETICS, Local; ANESTHETICS, Local; ANIMALS; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKERS, Non-depolarizing


JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Os efeitos dos anestésicos locais (AL) na transmissão neuromuscular e sua influência no bloqueio neuromuscular produzido por bloqueadores neuromusculares competitivos são ainda alvo de pouca investigação. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar in vitro os efeitos da lidocaína e da mistura enantiomérica em excesso de 50% de bupivacaína (S75-R25) no bloqueio neuromuscular produzido pelo rocurônio. MÉTODOS: Ratos foram distribuídos em cinco grupos (n = 5) de acordo com o fármaco estudado: lidocaína, bupivacaína (S75-R25), rocurônio, isoladamente (grupos I, II e III); rocurônio em preparações previamente expostas aos AL (grupos IV e V). As concentrações utilizadas foram: 20 µg.mL-1, 5 µg.mL-1 e 4 µg.mL¹ para lidocaína, bupivacaína (S75-R25) e rocurônio, respectivamente. Avaliaram-se: 1) a força de contração muscular do diafragma à estimulação elétrica indireta, antes e 60 minutos após a adição dos AL e do rocurônio isoladamente, e a associação AL-rocurônio; 2) os efeitos dos AL sobre o potencial de membrana (PM) e potenciais de placa terminal em miniatura (PPTM). Em preparação biventer cérvicis de pintainho, foi avaliado o efeito do AL na resposta contraturante à acetilcolina. RESULTADOS: A lidocaína e a bupivacaína (S75-R25) isoladamente não alteraram as respostas musculares e os valores do PM. Nas preparações expostas aos AL, o bloqueio pelo rocurônio foi significativamente maior em relação ao produzido pelo rocurônio isoladamente. Em preparação biventer cervicis de pintainho, a lidocaína e a bupivacaína (S75-R25) diminuíram a resposta de contração à acetilcolina. A lidocaína aumentou a frequência dos PPTM, seguido de bloqueio; a bupivacaína (S75-R25) produziu diminuição seguida de bloqueio. CONCLUSÕES: Os anestésicos locais potencializaram o bloqueio neuromuscular causado pelo rocurônio. Os resultados mostraram ação pré-sináptica e póssináptica.

ANESTÉSICOS, Local; ANESTÉSICOS, Local; ANIMAIS; BLOQUEADORES NEUROMUSCULARES, Não despolarizantes


JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Los efectos de los anestésicos locales (AL), en la transmisión neuromuscular y su influencia en el bloqueo neuromuscular producido por bloqueadores neuromusculares competitivos, todavía no se ha investigado lo suficiente. El objetivo del estudio, fue evaluar in vitro los efectos de la lidocaína y de la mezcla enantiomérica en exceso de 50% de bupivacaína (S75-R25) en el bloqueo neuromuscular producido por el rocuronio. MÉTODOS: Algunos ratones se distribuyeron en cinco grupos (n = 5) de acuerdo con el fármaco estudiado: lidocaína, bupivacaína (S75-R25), rocuronio, aisladamente (Grupos I, II, III); rocuronio en preparaciones previamente expuestas a los AL (Grupos IV, V). Las concentraciones utilizadas fueron: 20 µg.mL-1, 5 µg.mL-1 y 4 µg.mL-1, para lidocaína, bupivacaína (S75-R25), y rocuronio, respectivamente. Se evaluó: 1) la fuerza de contracción muscular del diafragma a la estimulación eléctrica indirecta, antes y 60 minutos después de la adición de los AL y rocuronio aisladamente, y la asociación AL - rocuronio; 2) efectos de los AL sobre el potencial de la membrana (PM) y potenciales de placa terminal en miniatura (PPTM). En una preparación biventer cérvicis de pollito, se evaluó el efecto de los AL en la respuesta de contracción a la acetilcolina. RESULTADOS: La lidocaína y la bupivacaína (S75-R25) aisladamente, no alteraron las respuestas musculares y los valores del PM. En las preparaciones expuestas a los AL, el bloqueo por el rocuronio fue significativamente mayor con relación al producido por el rocuronio aisladamente. En una preparación biventer cervicis de pollito, la lidocaína y la bupivacaína (S75-R25), redujeron la respuesta de contracción a la acetilcolina. La lidocaína aumentó la frecuencia de los PPTM, seguido de bloqueo; la bupivacaína (S75-R25) generó una disminución seguida de bloqueo. CONCLUSIONES: Los anestésicos locales potenciaron el bloqueo neuromuscular causado por el rocuronio. Los resultados mostraron una acción presináptica y postsináptica.


SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE

Influence of local anesthetics on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium. Effects of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine on the neuromuscular junction*

Influencia de anestésicos locales sobre el bloqueo neuromuscular producido por el rocuronio. Acción de la lidocaína y de la mezcla enantiomérica en exceso de 50% de bupivacaína en la junción neuromuscular

Angélica de Fátima de Assunção Braga, TSA, M.D.I; Vanessa Henriques Carvalho, M.D.II; Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga, M.D.III; Léa Rodrigues-Simioni, M.D.IV; Yolanda Christina S. Loyola, M.D.V; Glória Braga Potério, TSA, M.DVI

IProfessora Associada; Livre-Docente do Departamento de Anestesiologia da FCM/UNICAMP; Responsável pela Seção de Anestesia - CAISM/UNICAMP

IIAnestesiologista; Mestra em Farmacologia

IIIProfessor Doutor; Chefe do Departamento de Anestesiologia da FCM/UNICAMP

IVProfessora Associada; Livre-Docente do Departamento de Farmacologia da FCM/UNICAMP; Professora e Pesquisadora Voluntária do Departamento de Farmacologia da FCM/UNICAMP

VDoutor em Farmacologia; Médica Veterinária

VIProfessora Associada; Livre Docente do Departamento de Anestesiologia da FCM/UNICAMP; Presidente da Sociedade de Anestesiologia do Estado de São Paulo (SAESP)

Correspondence to

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The effects of local anesthetics (LA) on neuromuscular transmission and their influence on the neuromuscular blockade produced by competitive neuromuscular blockers have not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the effects of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (S75-R25) on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium.

METHODS: The rats were divided in five groups (n = 5) according to the drug used: isolated lidocaine, bupivacaine (S75-R25), or rocuronium (groups I, II, and II); and rocuronium in preparations previously exposed to LAs (groups IV and V). The concentrations used were as follows: 20 µg.mL-1, 5 µg.mL-1, and 4 µg.mL-1 of lidocaine, bupivacaine (S75-R25), and rocuronium, respectively. The following parameters were evaluated: 1) the strength of muscular contraction of the diaphragm to indirect electrical stimulations, before and 60 minutes after the isolated addition of the LAs and rocuronium, and the association AL-rocuronium; and 2) the effects of LAs on membrane potential (MP) and miniature end-plate potentials (MEPP). The effect of LAs on muscle contraction in response to acetylcholine was evaluated in chick biventer cervicis preparations.

RESULTS: Isolated lidocaine and bupivacaine (S75-R25) did not change the muscular response and the levels of MPs. In preparations exposed to LAs, rocuroniuminduced blockade was significantly greater than that produced by rocuronium alone. In chick biventer cervicis preparations, lidocaine and bupivacaine (S75R25) decreased contraction in response to acetylcholine. Lidocaine increased the frequency of MEPPs, which was followed by the blockade; bupivacaine (S75R25) caused a reduction in MEPPs followed by blockade.

CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetics caused a potentiation of the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium. The results showed pre- and post-synaptic effects.

Keywords: ANESTHETICS, Local: bupivacaine (S75-R25), lidocaine; ANIMALS: rats; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKERS, Non-depolarizing: rocuronium.

RESUMEN

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Los efectos de los anestésicos locales (AL), en la transmisión neuromuscular y su influencia en el bloqueo neuromuscular producido por bloqueadores neuromusculares competitivos, todavía no se ha investigado lo suficiente. El objetivo del estudio, fue evaluar in vitro los efectos de la lidocaína y de la mezcla enantiomérica en exceso de 50% de bupivacaína (S75-R25) en el bloqueo neuromuscular producido por el rocuronio.

MÉTODOS: Algunos ratones se distribuyeron en cinco grupos (n = 5) de acuerdo con el fármaco estudiado: lidocaína, bupivacaína (S75-R25), rocuronio, aisladamente (Grupos I, II, III); rocuronio en preparaciones previamente expuestas a los AL (Grupos IV, V). Las concentraciones utilizadas fueron: 20 µg.mL-1, 5 µg.mL-1 y 4 µg.mL-1, para lidocaína, bupivacaína (S75-R25), y rocuronio, respectivamente. Se evaluó: 1) la fuerza de contracción muscular del diafragma a la estimulación eléctrica indirecta, antes y 60 minutos después de la adición de los AL y rocuronio aisladamente, y la asociación AL - rocuronio; 2) efectos de los AL sobre el potencial de la membrana (PM) y potenciales de placa terminal en miniatura (PPTM). En una preparación biventer cérvicis de pollito, se evaluó el efecto de los AL en la respuesta de contracción a la acetilcolina.

RESULTADOS: La lidocaína y la bupivacaína (S75-R25) aisladamente, no alteraron las respuestas musculares y los valores del PM. En las preparaciones expuestas a los AL, el bloqueo por el rocuronio fue significativamente mayor con relación al producido por el rocuronio aisladamente. En una preparación biventer cervicis de pollito, la lidocaína y la bupivacaína (S75-R25), redujeron la respuesta de contracción a la acetilcolina. La lidocaína aumentó la frecuencia de los PPTM, seguido de bloqueo; la bupivacaína (S75-R25) generó una disminución seguida de bloqueo.

CONCLUSIONES: Los anestésicos locales potenciaron el bloqueo neuromuscular causado por el rocuronio. Los resultados mostraron una acción presináptica y postsináptica.

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of neuromuscular blockers can be modified by several factors like, for example, acid-base balance, temperature, monitoring, different diseases (burns, upper and lower motor neuron disorders), and drugs administered by different routes1-12.

The interaction between local anesthetics and neuromuscular blockers observed in experimental studies7,9 has also been reported in clinical assays, resulting in potentiation of the effects of neuromuscular blockers by local anesthetics administered by different routes1,2,4-6,10-12. However, although those effects have been demonstrated in experimental studies, in isolated preparations, and in clinical assays, the effects on neuromuscular transmission and in the neuromuscular blockade produced by non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers has not been fully investigated. Understanding this type of interaction between local anesthetics and competitive neuromuscular blockers used in daily practice is important, since it allows their safe use.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate, in experimental models, the effects of lidocaine and 50% enantio-meric excess bupivacaine on neuromuscular transmission, their influence on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium, and to investigate the probable mechanism of interaction between local anesthetics and rocuronium.

METHODS

This is an experimental in vitro study and the procedures followed the ethical principles of animal studies of the Brazilian College of Animal Studies (COBEA, from the Portuguese) and it was approved by the Ethics Commission on Animal Studies of the Biology Institute of Universidade Estadual de Campinas (protocol # 1204-1).

To evaluate the effects of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine on neuromuscular transmission and their influence on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium, rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm, prepared according to the method proposed by Bulbrig, was used13.

Twenty-five male Wistar rats weighing 180 to 250 g were used. Animals were anesthetized with urethane (1.2 mg.kg-1, intraperitoneal administration); afterwards, they were exsanguinated by severing the neck vessel to facilitate the identification and removal of the left hemi-diaphragm and the corresponding section of the phrenic nerve. Preparations were fixed in 40 mL of Tyrode's solution, constantly aerated with carbogen (95% O2 + 5% CO2), and maintained at 37º C. The nerve was placed on platinum electrodes connected to a Grass S48 stimulator. Constant tension (5.0 g) was applied to the tendon of the diaphragm by a wire connected to the Load Cell BG50 GMS isometric transducer, and indirect stimulation of 0.1 Hz frequency and duration of 0.2 msec was applied; variations in tension produced by diaphragmatic contractions were recorded by the Gould RS 3400 physiograph.

Preparations were divided in five groups (n = 5) according to the drug added: Group I - lidocaine (20 µg.mL-1); Group II - 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (5 µg.mL-1); Group III - rocuronium (4 µg.mL-1); Group IV - rocuronium (4 µg.mL-1) in preparations previously exposed to lidocaine (20 µg.mL-1); Group V - rocuronium (4 µg.mL-1) in preparations previously exposed to 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (5 µg.ml). In groups IV and V, rocuronium was added 30 minutes after lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine, respectively. Muscular responses to indirect stimulation were recorded for 60 minutes after the addition of the drugs. The following parameter were evaluated in those groups: 1) the amplitude of the diaphragmatic response to indirect stimulation, before and 60 minutes after the isolate addition of lidocaine, 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine, and rocuronium; and 2) the amplitude of the diaphragmatic response after the addition of rocuronium to preparations previously exposed to lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine.

Phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparations were also used to study the effects of local anesthetics in miniature end-plate potentials (MEPP) and membrane potentials (MP). The chick biventer cervicis preparation, also used in this study, was prepared according to the method described by Ginsborg and Warrimer14. Fourteen four- to eight-day old chicks weighing 40 to 80 g, were anesthetized with inhalational halothane, followed by the removal of the biventer cervicis muscle, which was suspended in a 5-mL container with Krebs solution. The preparation was aerated with carbogen and the temperature was maintained at 37º C. Experiments (n - 7/group) were undertaken to detect the acetylcholine curve (5 µg.mL-1) before and after the addition of each local anesthetic: lidocaine (20 µg.mL-1) and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (5 µg.mL-1). Indirect stimuli with supramaximal pulses (duration of 0.2 msec and frequency of 0.1 Hz) were applied to the muscle. The responses to acetylcholine were recorded in the Gould RS 3400 physiograph, before and 30 minutes after the addition of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine.

Results were expressed as means and standard deviation. The Student t test, Wilcoxon test, Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney test were used in the statistical analysis. A level of significance of 5% (p < 0.05) was used. The power of the test was calculated, showing β > 20% (power > 80%).

RESULTS

The isolate use of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine in the concentrations used in the present study did not cause significant reduction in the amplitude of the muscular response to indirect electrical stimulation of the rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparation. Rocuronium alone produced a 73.12 ± 9.89% blockade (Figure 1). In preparations previously exposed to lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine, rocuronium produced a 90.10 ± 9.15% and 100% blockade, respectively, which was significantly different (p = 0.0037) than that produced by rocuronium alone. Rocuronium produced total (100%) blockade in preparations previously exposed to 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine, which occurred earlier (24.0 ± 6.74 min) than in preparations exposed to lidocaine (Figure 2).



The local anesthetics investigated did not cause significant changes in membrane potential. The effects of lidocaine on miniature end-plate potentials were initially characterized by an increase in frequency 30 minutes after adding the drug, which was followed by a blockade after 60 minutes. Bupivacaine (S75-R25) caused a reduction in the amplitude and frequency in MEPPs, which was followed by a blockade (Figure 3).


In chick biventer cervicis preparations, lidocaine (20 µg.mL-1) and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (5 µg.mL-1) caused a significant reduction, 28.77± 19.65% and 33.2 ± 11.69%, respectively, in the contracture provoked by acetylcholine. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the percentage reduction in the contraction in response to acetylcholine was similar (p = 0.2550) with both local anesthetics.

DISCUSSION

Lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine are frequently used in different types of blockade. Additionally, lidocaine is commonly used to suppress reflexes during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, and it is also a first-line drug in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, with great advantages over quinidine and procainamide due to its fast onset of action and easy titration6,12,15.

The present study demonstrated that, in the concentrations used, lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine, isolated or not, did not have significant effects in the neuromuscular junction, but they did potentiate the blockade induced by rocuronium. Those results are similar to those of other authors who also reported the lack of effects of local anesthetics in neuromuscular transmission, but who observed potentiation of the effects of different neuromuscular blockers when local anesthetics were administered by different routes1,2,4-7,9,10,16.

In studies with cats, the neuromuscular blockade induced by the lidocaine-pancuronium association was 20% greater than that of pancuronium alone, which was statistically significant16. In vitro studies with rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparations, the authors also observed potentiation of rocuronium-induced blockade in preparations previously exposed to procainamide and lidocaine7,9. It is possible that prolonged exposure to local anesthetics can cause a reduction in the number of nicotinic receptors in the neuromuscular junction, with the consequent reduction in the safety margin9,17.

In humans, the effects of vecuronium and atracurium were prolonged by the epidural administration of bupivacaine, and the duration of action of rocuronium was increased by the intravenous administration of lidocaine1,2,6.

The interaction between local anesthetics and neuromuscular blockers is not completely understood, and several mechanisms can be responsible for the potentiation observed. In theory, those agents can interfere with any step of the neuromuscular transmission. The pre-synaptic effects of local anesthetics can cause selective depression of motor fiber conduction and decrease the release of acetylcholine during nerve stimulation18-20. Their post-synaptic effects include binding to different acetylcholine-specific sites, resulting in the desensitization of those receptors, besides the temporary occlusion of ion channels in nicotinic receptors9,21,23.

Lidocaine can block completely nerve conduction and can also cause depression of pre- and post-junctional impulses24. A study that correlating the molecular structure of different lidocaine byproducts with their ability to inhibit muscular transmission and local anesthetic potency, demonstrated that the molecular properties of those by-products associated with changes in neuromuscular transmission are similar to those involved in the activation of acetylcholine receptors and not with their local anesthetic potency. Those results suggest that lidocaine produces neuromuscular blockade by different mechanisms than those involved with its local anesthetic effects24.

In the present study, it was also observed that, in experiments in which bupivacaine (S75-R25) was used, rocuronium induced complete neuromuscular blockade, which developed earlier than in preparations exposed to lidocaine, in approximately 24.0 ± 6.74 minutes. Bupivacaine (S75-R25), an amphiphilic molecule, has great affinity for excitable cellular membranes, inactivating voltage-gated sodium channels and, therefore, block the influx of ions necessary for membrane depolarization. It is believed that two mechanisms are responsible for the reduction in membrane permeability to sodium ions: general changes in membrane fluidity with conformational modifications in the protein of voltage-gated sodium channels and/or by the specific interaction of local anesthetics with sodium channels25-27. On the other hand, the direct correlation between hydrophobicity and anesthetic potency indicates that nonspecific partition of a large amount of local anesthetic in the lipid bilayer is important to facilitate the access of the molecule to voltage-gated sodium binding sites28,29.

The structure and physical-chemical characteristics of 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine can fundamental for such findings, since the potency of this drug is greater than that of lidocaine. This property can be attributed to the greater hydrophobicity of this agent, indicating an alternative access pathway to hydrophobic sites in the sodium channel protein. On the other hand, lipid solubility is crucial for drug partition in the axon to guarantee that enough amounts of local anesthetic penetrate in the membrane and inactivate the sodium channel29,30.

Racemic bupivacaine, enantiomeric excess bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and mepivacaine contain a chiral center in their piperidinium ring, which is responsible for the optical isomers with S (-) and R (+) configurations. Besides receptor affinity, this stereoisomery also contributes for fluidization of cellular membranes27.

The effects of local anesthetics were also evaluated in other preparations looking for probable mechanisms of this interaction. The characteristics of the chick biventer cervicis preparation are different from mammal preparations and, due to the peculiar behavior in the presence of nicotinic receptor agonists, it allowed the evaluation of the affinity of lidocaine and bupivacaine (S75-R25) for post-synaptic nicotinic receptors. Post-synaptic activity of different drugs, such as local anesthetics, can be identified by the absence of response to cholinergic agonists without affecting the response to the increase in potassium concentration or direct stimulation31.

Due to the high density of receptors in bird musculature, agonists cause sustained depolarization of muscle fibers, leading to muscular contracture (shortening of muscle fibers) secondary to the influx of calcium ions in those cells. This type of behavior is different from normal muscular contraction, since, in the latter, fast end-plate depolarization generates an action potential that spreads throughout the muscle fiber, while contracture is a sustained and slow de-polarization and that does not spread, but it is seen on every site of the fiber that contains acetylcholine receptors14,32.

The results observed in this preparation demonstrated that different local anesthetics, in the concentrations used here, cause significant and similar reductions in contracture in response to acetylcholine, which suggests that the interaction with rocuronium might be due to a competitive mechanism between local anesthetics and the neurotransmitter. Those results can be explained by the results of Ueta et al.33 who studied, in vitro, the antagonistic activity of racemic bupivacaine and its two enantiomers, S (-) and R (+), in nicotinic cholinergic receptors, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors, 5hydroxitryptamine (5-HT), and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA). The authors concluded that racemic bupivacaine and its isomers cause similar and concentration-dependent antagonism of the activity of those receptors.

Similarly to other authors, we observed that the local anesthetics in the concentrations used here did not produce changes in the membrane potential of muscular fibers, demonstrating that lidocaine and bupivacaine (S75-R25), in those concentrations, do not cause depolarization of the muscle fiber, and that their mechanism of action in the neuromuscular junction is not related with their ability to stabilize the muscular membrane.

The study of miniature end-plate potentials contributed to the investigation of the pre- and post-synaptic influence of the drugs used, by their interference in the process of mediator production or release34. As described previously by other authors, lidocaine, initially, caused an increase in the frequency of miniature end-plate potentials followed by a blockade7, which might suggest that lidocaine has pre-synaptic activity, leading to a discrete increase in the release of acetylcholine. It is possible that this initial increase in the concentration of the neurotransmitter in the synaptic cleft and its prolonged contact with the end-plate terminal could cause desensitization of those receptors and consequent blockade.

Unlike lidocaine, preparations exposed to bupivacaine (S75-R25) showed progressive blockade of MEPP, with reduction in their frequency and amplitude, until it disappeared completely. The results of electrophysiologic studies demonstrated that those drugs, in the concentrations used in the present study, interfere with the release of acetylcholine.

According to the literature, the results of the present study showed that the mechanisms responsible for the interaction between the local anesthetics investigated here and rocuronium are differentiated and controversial. The changes in miniature end-plate potentials indicate a pre-synaptic effect modifying the quantal release of acetylcholine. The absence of changes in membrane potentials demonstrates that, in the concentrations used here, those drugs do not depolarize muscle fibers and the reduction in the amplitude of the response to acetylcholine probably reflects post-synaptic effects, especially in the motor end-plate.

Isolated lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine did not compromise neuromuscular transmission, but they potentiated rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Those results indicate that the neuromuscular blockade should be monitored and the dose of neuromuscular blockers should be reduced when used in combination with those agents.

REFERENCES

  • 01. Toft P, Kirkegaard Nielsen H, Severinsen I et al. - Effect of epidurally administered bupivacaine on atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1990;34: 649-652.
  • 02. Taivainen T, Meretoja OA, Rosenberg PH - The effect of epidural bupivacaine on vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1994;38:453-456.
  • 03. Haywood PT, Divekar N, Karalliedde LD - Concurrent medication and the neuromuscular junction. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 1999;16: 77-91.
  • 04. Nonaka A, Sugawara T, Suzuki S et al. - Pretreatment with lidocaine accelerates onset of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Masui, 2002;51:880-883.
  • 05. Munakata K, Suzuki T, Watanabe N et al. - Influence of epidural lidocaine injection on vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Masui, 2004;53:1377-1380.
  • 06. Cardoso LSM, Martins CR, Tardelli MA - Efeitos da lidocaína por via venosa sobre a farmacodinâmica do rocurônio. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2005;55:371-380.
  • 07. Loyola YCS, Braga AFA, Potério GMB et al. - Influência da lidocaína no bloqueio neuromuscular produzido pelo rocurônio. Estudo em Preparação Nervo Frênico-Diafragma de Rato. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2006;56:147-156.
  • 08. Braga AFA, Munoz DC, Braga FS et al. - Influence of stimulus frequency on blockade induced by pancuronium and rocuronium: study on rats phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparation. Acta Cir Bras, 2007;22:446-450.
  • 09. Martins TD, Loyola YCS, Braga AFA - Influência da procainamida sobre o bloqueio neuromuscular produzido pelo rocurônio e investigação sobre o mecanismo de ação da procainamida na junção neuromuscular. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2007;57:74-82.
  • 10. Suzuki T, Mizutani H, Ishikawa K et al. - Epidurally administered mepivacaine delays recovery of train-of-four ratio from vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth, 2007;99:721-725.
  • 11. Braga AD, Barcelos CC, Braga FS et al. - Phenobarbital influence on neuromuscular block produced by rocuronium in rats. Acta Cir Bras, 2008;23:343-347.
  • 12. Yorukoglu D, Asik Y, Okten F - Rocuronium combined with i.v. lidocaine for rapid tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2003;47:583-587.
  • 13. Bulbring E - Observation on the isolated phyrenic nerve-diaphragm preparation of the rat. Br J Pharmacol, 1946;1:38-61.
  • 14. Ginsborg BL, Warriner J - The isolated chick biventer cervicis nerve-muscle preparation. Br J Pharmacol Chemother, 1960;15:410-411.
  • 15. Ferez D, Machado RC - Disritmias Cardíacas e Antidisrítmicos, em: Cangiani LM, Posso IP, Potério GMB, Nogueira CS - Tratado de Anestesiologia - SAESP, 6Ş Ed, São Paulo, Atheneu, 2007; 615-654.
  • 16. Carpenter RL, Mulroy MF - Edrophonium antagonizes combined lidocaine-pacuronium and verapamil-pancuronium neuromuscular blockade in cats. Anesthesiology, 1986;65:506-510.
  • 17. Fontana MD, Vital Brazil O - Mecanismo da potencialização causada pela quinidina e procainamida sobre o bloqueio neuromuscular produzido pela d-tubocurarina. Ciênc Cult, 1973; 25:485.
  • 18. Hirst GD - On the neuromuscular paralysis produced by procaine. Br J Pharmacol, 1971;41:94-104.
  • 19. Matthews EK, Quilliam JP - Effects of central depressant drugs upon acetylcholine release. Br J Pharmacol Chemother, 1964; 22:415-440.
  • 20. Usubiaga JE, Standaert F - The effects of local anesthetics on motor nerve terminals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1968;159:353-361.
  • 21. Sine SM, Taylor P - Local anesthetics and histrionicotoxin are allosteric inhibitors of the acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem, 1982;257:8106-8114.
  • 22. Neher E, Steinback JH - Local anaesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J Physiol (London), 1978;277:153-176.
  • 23. Ruff RL - The kinetics of local anesthetic blockade of end-plate channels. Biophys J, 1982;37:625-631.
  • 24. Steinbach AB - Alteration of xylocaine (lidocaine) and its derivatives of the time course of the end plate potential. J Gen Physiol, 1968;52:144-161.
  • 25. Ragsdale DS, Avoli M - Sodium channels as molecular targets for antiepileptic drugs. Brain Res Rev, 1998;26:16-28.
  • 26. Li HL, Galue A, Meadows L et al. - A molecular basis for the different local anesthetic affinities of resting versus open and inactivated states of the sodium channel. Mol Pharmacol, 1999; 55:134-141.
  • 27. Mizogami M, Tsuchiya H, Harada J - Membrane effects of ropivacaine compared with those of bupivacaine and mepivacaine. Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2002;16:325-330.
  • 28. de Paula E, Schreier S - Molecular and physicochemical aspects of local anesthetic-membrane interaction. Braz J Med Biol Res, 1996;29:877-894.
  • 29. Schreier S, Malheiros SVP, de Paula E - Surface active drugs: self-association and interaction with membranes and surfactants. Physicochemical and biological aspects. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2000;1508:210-234.
  • 30. Fraceto LF, De Paula E - Interação de anestésicos locais com lipossomos determinada por espectroscopia de infravermelho. Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl, 2006;27:27-35.
  • 31. Barrett JC, Harvey AL - Effects of the venom of the green mamba, Dendroaspis angusticeps on skeletal muscle and neuromuscular transmission. Br J Pharmacol, 1979; 67:199-205.
  • 32. Miranda FG, Marín JS, Aränó JA - Neurofisiologia de la union neuromuscular, em: Gómez JAA, Miranda FG, Bozzo RB - Relajantes Musculares em Anestesia y Terapia Intensiva, Madrid, Aran, 2000;61-70.
  • 33. Ueta K, Sugimoto M, Suzuki T et al. - In vitro antagonism of recombinant ligand-gated ion-channel receptors by stereospecific enantiomers of bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2006;31:19-25.
  • 34. Fatt P, Katz B - Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J Physiol (London), 1952;117:109-128.
  • Endereço para correspondência:
    Dra. Angélica de Fátima de Assunção Braga
    Rua Luciano Venere Decourt, 245 Cidade Universitária
    13083-740 Campinas, SP
    E-mail:
  • *
    Recebido dos Departamentos de Anestesiologia e Farmacologia da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM) da Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      02 Dec 2009
    • Date of issue
      Dec 2009

    History

    • Accepted
      17 Aug 2009
    • Received
      08 May 2009
    Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia R. Professor Alfredo Gomes, 36, 22251-080 Botafogo RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 2537-8100, Fax: +55 21 2537-8188 - Campinas - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: bjan@sbahq.org