Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Print version ISSN 0034-7094
Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.61 no.1 Campinas Jan./Feb. 2011
Fernando Souza NaniI, Marcelo Luis Abramides TorresII
IAssistant Physician of the Anesthesia Department of Instituto Central do HCFMUSP
IIProfessor, Medical Doctor of Anesthesiology at FMUSP. Supervising Physician of the Anesthesia Department of the Instituto da Criança do HCFMUSP
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Very few publications correlate hypotension in obese pregnant women, and especially morbidly obese, after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of hypotension according to the BMI.
METHODS: Forty-nine patients with pregestational BMI below 25 kg.m-2 were included in the Eutrophia group, and 51 patients with BMI > 25 kg.m-2 were included in the Overweight group. After spinal anesthesia, blood pressure, volume of crystalloid infused, and dose of vasopressors used until delivery were recorded. A fall in systolic blood pressure below 100 mmHg or 10% reduction of the initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) was considered as hypotension and it was corrected by the administration of vasopressors.
RESULTS: Episodes of hypotension were fewer in the Eutrophia group (5.89 ± 0.53 vs. 7.80 ± 0.66, p = 0.027), as well as the amount of crystalloid administered (1,298 ± 413.6 mL vs. 1,539 ± 460.0 mL; p = 0.007), and use of vasopressors (5.87 ± 3.45 bolus vs. 7.70 ± 4.46 bolus; p = 0.023). As for associated diseases, we observed higher incidence of diabetes among obese pregnant women (29.41% vs. 9.76%, RR 1.60, 95%CI: 1.15-2.22, p = 0.036), however, differences in the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) were not observe between both groups (overweight: 21.57%, normal weight: 12.20%, RR 1.30, 95%CI: 0.88-1.94, p = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS: In the study sample, pregestational BMI > 25 kg.m-2 was a risk factor for hypotension after spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. The same group of patients required higher doses of vasopressors. Those results indicate that the anesthetic techniques in those patients should be improved to reduce the consequences of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, both in pregnant women and fetuses.
Keywords: Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Cesarean Section; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthesia, Spinal.
Spinal, epidural, or combined anesthesias are widely used in obstetrics, both for cesarean section and labor analgesia 1-3. This is due to the proven lower morbidity and mortality 1 when compared to general anesthesia that has a higher incidence of complications, such as: difficult intubation, rapid desaturation, greater chance of aspiration, and neonatal depression 2,4, besides the impossibility of keeping the mother conscious for the delivery.
Despite the advantages of regional anesthesia it is not free of complications and already known limitations, such as difficult puncture in some cases, hypotension, total spinal anesthesia, post-dural puncture headache, and nerve lesions 2. Hypotension is one of the most common complications with an incidence of 15% to 33% 5-7 in the general population after spinal anesthesia and directly related to greater mortality 4. In obstetric patients, hypotension is even more worrisome because besides showing greater incidence (20-100%) it can have serious maternal-fetal consequences, from an increased incidence of nausea and vomiting to fetal hypoxia due to changes in utero-placental blood flow with consequent fetal acidosis 2,8.
Post-regional anesthesia hypotension has several definitions, such as a fall of systolic blood pressure below 100 mmHg or a 10% to 30% fall from baseline levels 2,9,10. Currently, the tendency is to maintain blood pressure as close as possible to the initial levels. Some measures are adopted to prevent hypotension and its consequences, such as moving the uterus to the left, crystalloid or colloid infusion, use of vasopressors like ephedrine and metaraminol, and compression of the lower limbs 2,8-10.
There is a lack of studies comparing complications of spinal anesthesia in pregnant women with increased weight to those of eutrophic patients for cesarean section 11, including hypotension, which makes this analysis important due to the high incidence of obesity in pregnant women. The objective of this study was to analyze the frequency and severity of hypotension in overweight pregnant women when compared to non-obese pregnant women after regional anesthesia in order to effectively improve anesthesia in this type of patient, analyze the influence of comorbidities, and to determine the hemodynamic behavior pattern within different strata of obese patients (BMI > 25, BMI > 30, and BMI > 35).
After orientation on the anesthesia procedures and the signing of an informed consent, patients were divided into 2 groups based on pregestational BMI, according to the WHO classification which indicates as eutrophic patients with BMI > 20, overweight > 25, obesity > 30, and morbid obesity > 35. In the Euthropia group, patients with pregestational BMI < 25 kg.m-2 were included, while in the Overweight group patients with pregestational BMI > 25 kg,m-2 were included. Patients on doses of anticoagulants that contraindicated spinal anesthesia, thrombocytopenia, coagulogram changes, maternal cardiopathies, history of coagulopathies, twin pregnancy, and those who refused to participate in the study were excluded. Patients were monitored with cardioscope, non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), and pulse oximeter. Blood pressure was measured three times at 5-minute intervals, before the spinal block, obtaining the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) to be used as a baseline for correction of hypotension. Ringer's lactate was infused at the same time anesthesia was administered for a total of 10 mL.kg-1 until delivery.
After spinal anesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine associated with 80 mcg of morphine administered in 70 seconds, the uterus was dislocated, the blood pressure was measured every 2 minutes, volume of crystalloids infused and total doses of vasopressors were recorded. Hypotension was defined as a fall in SBP of 10% of the baseline or below 100 mmHg. In the presence of hypotension the anesthesiologist administered a bolus of 200 mcg of metaraminol or 5 mg of ephedrine, whichever he considered appropriate. All anesthesia techniques, doses, and conduction followed the standards of Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina of Universidade de São Paulo for cesarean section without changing the anesthetic technique or patient care. Associated diseases were also recorded.
The Student's t test (with Welch correction when indicated) was used to compare means, while the Fisher's exact test was used to compare incidences between the study groups. When analyzing the subgroups of the Overweight group, one-way Analysis of Variance with post-test of Newman-Keuls (or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post-test, whenever indicated) was used. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation) and p smaller than 0.05 was considered significant. The software Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
The incidence of hypotension independently of the number of episodes or their severity was 95.92% in the Eutrophia group, and 94% in the Overweight group (NS). After gathering the data and statistical analysis, it was observed that the number of hypotensive episodes were smaller in the Eutrophia group (5.96 ± 3.64 vs. 7.78 ± 4.73; p = 0.034), which is shown in Figure 1. The volume of crystalloids was also smaller in the Eutrophia group (1,299 ± 414 mL vs. 1,549 ± 454 mL; p = 0.005) shown in Figure 2, and the use of vasopressors was smaller in the Eutrophia group (5.88 ± 3.46 bolus vs. 7.90 ± 4.78; p = 0.017), shown in Figure 3. The reduction in SBP in relation to initial levels in the Eutrophia group was 24.80 ± 9.32% versus 29.28 ± 13.51% in the Overweight group (p = 0.056), shown in Figure 4.
Regarding associated diseases the incidence of gestational diabetes and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) was analyzed, since those disorders can cause preponderant systemic changes for higher or lower incidence of cases of hypotension. It was observed a higher incidence of diabetes in the Overweight group (29.41% vs. 8.16%, RR 3.60, 95%CI: 1.28-10.1, p = 0.009); however, differences were not observed between both groups regarding the incidence of PIH (overweight: 21.57%, normal weight: 10.20%, RR 2.11, 95%CI: 0.79-5.64, p = 0.17). One patient was excluded from the Eutrophia group since correction of hypotension did not follow the protocol.
An analysis in 3 subgroups in the Overweight group (BMI > 25, BMI > 30, and BMI > 35) was also performed; significant differences were not observed in episodes of hypotension or reduction in SBP among the subgroups (Table I).
A significant increase in the incidence of overweight has been observed in the general population characterizing, according to the WHO, a pandemic 1,12. This increase has also been seen in obstetric patients reaching a prevalence of about 5.5% during pregnancy according to a Brazilian study 13 which makes the analysis of this group important for an adequate anesthetic technique. Hartmann et al. 6 evaluated risk factors for post-spinal anesthesia hypotension in the general population indicating greater risk for patients with a history of hypertension, chronic alcohol abuse, and increased body mass index (BMI), but it excluded obstetric anesthesia.
Pregnancy is associated with some modifications that place the cardiovascular system of pregnant women under stress and when associated with obesity it increases even more the cardiovascular stress. The significant increase in cardiac output, especially during and immediately after labor, reaches up to 75% above pre-pregnancy levels 14,15. It exacerbates even more in the obese patient in whom for every 100 g of increase in the adipose tissue the cardiac output increases by 50 mL.min-1 15,16. Besides, reduction in afterload during pregnancy is less significant in the obese patient due to an increase in peripheral vascular resistance 15. As a consequence of increased volemia in those patients, initially a left ventricular hypertrophy was observed followed by a gradual dilation of the myocardium against this sustained increase in blood pressure generated by the hypervolemic state, occasionally leading to systolic dysfunction 15. Pregestational hypertension could be exacerbated and associated with an increase in baseline heart rate and cardiac output, which can lead to diastolic dysfunction. The pulmonary flow increases in the same proportion as the increase in cardiac output and in this hyperdynamic state it leads to pulmonary hypertension, which if sustained can lead to right ventricular failure. Supine position, sleep apnea, and hypoxemia can exacerbate this clinical picture 15. The possibility of supine hypotension syndrome in those patients increases the morbidity and mortality 15,17.
Besides those specific changes in the cardiovascular system some hormonal changes are exacerbated by obesity, and they can overload even more cardiovascular functions. Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance result in fat deposits that might be also seen in the myocardium leading to changes in contractility and conductivity of the cardiac electric stimulus, which makes obese pregnant women more susceptible to arrhythmia, including fatal ones 14,15. Obesity results in dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, and increased vascular inflammation. This endothelial dysfunction predisposes to the development of pregnancy-induced hypertension 15. Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular disease are also worrisome due to the frequent association of obesity and hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and myocardial dysfunction 15,18. In those patients dilutional anemia compromises transport and tissue delivery of oxygen especially in cases of acute bleeding 17. The pro-coagulant state associated with decreased mobility makes obese pregnant women a risk group for thrombotic events 15,17.
Previously obese pregnant women are more prone to antenatal and gestational comorbidities such as chronic hypertension, diabetes, and preeclampsia, besides the greater chance of the development of fetal cardiac anomalies, macrosomia, and fetal shoulder dystocia 2. Some of those conditions can alter the consequences of anesthesia in those patients. In chronic diabetes, gestational or not, an autonomous neuropathy associated to diabetic cardiomyopathy probably increase the chances of post-regional anesthesia hypotension 19.
In obese pregnant women undergoing cesarean section, spinal anesthesia remains the most used anesthetic technique 15 due to historical advantages in obstetrics. The association of obesity and pregnancy represents an even higher risk of difficult airways, making it oftentimes a worrisome emergency, since it is associated with slower gastric emptying 15,17,20. The level of the spinal blockade in those patients when the single dose is used usually becomes more unpredictable and exaggerated than in a normal pregnant woman 15. This level of unpredictability is probably due to lower volume of cerebrospinal fluid, which is inversely proportional to the increase in BMI, greater compression of the epidural space by the excess weight, engorging of epidural space vessels, and deposit of fat in the epidural space 8.
Spinal anesthesia is almost always associated with hypotension in a normal pregnancy and it is usually related to aorto-cava compression which can be more important in obese pregnant women. Prophylactic measures for prevention and reduction of maternal hypotension have not been shown to be adequately effective, since they do not prevent the need of intraoperative pharmacologic treatment in those patients, besides being associated to undesirable effects such as the risk of acute pulmonary edema in high risk pregnant women secondary to hypervolemia, hypertension due to the use of vasopressors, fetal acidosis due to the use of ephedrine, and maternal arrhythmias due to the use of phenylephrine 8. Volemic expansion based on the weight of the patients in the case of morbidly obese pregnant women should be reevaluated due to the risk of hypervolemia, since volume expansion based on total weight can overload maximal cardiac complacency. The use of the corrected weight would be a possibility yet to be determined. It has been proposed that an imbalance between endogenous vasoactive substances especially a reduction in angiotensin II and increase in prostaglandins and nitric oxide are even or more important than the sympathetic blockade and aorto-cava compression in the physiology of hypotension, since patients with preeclampsia are exposed to the same factors and are less subject to episodes of hypotension 21. Maybe for this reason prophylactic measures against hypotension have little efficacy and the regulation of the vascular tonus especially venous is more important than maintenance of the venous return altered by aorto-cava compression. This might explain the lack of statistical significance in the number of hypotensive episodes and the severity of hypotension among overweight, obese, and morbidly obese patients; i.e., maybe aorto-cava compression is less important than possible metabolic and cardiovascular alterations associated to the increased BMI presented anteriorly.
In view of the data presented here, a more specific management of those patients is necessary. Reduction of local anesthetic doses in spinal anesthesia has been associated with a reduction in the frequency and severity of hypotension, besides the smaller need of pharmacologic treatment 8. However, a limitation in the time of blockade is observed, for example, between 60-70 min with doses of 5.5 to 6.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine associated with opioids observed in this study 8, which for obese patients is a limiting factor due to increased surgical time 8,15,17,22. This was more exacerbated in teaching hospitals, like ours.
The use of combined anesthetic techniques, such as sequential blockades, represent alternatives for regional anesthesia in this group of patients in several studies, since it has the benefits of smaller doses of intrathecal local anesthetics, besides ending the temporal limitations of the method 8,15,17,22. Despite being promising, the technique does not prevent the difficulties of neuroaxis puncture in obese patients. In cases of ineffective blockade, oftentimes anesthetic complementation via epidural catheter is ineffective for maintaining the quality of adequate anesthesia 8,22; therefore, the blockade should be tested and complemented preferentially before the surgical incision to avoid the critical situation of conversion to general anesthesia. We also should take into consideration the need of determining which patients should clearly benefit from the combined technique to adapt it to the clinical, economic, and logistic profile of each patient population.
Maternal obesity has increased significantly; however, the consequence of this new epidemiologic structure has not been investigated. The only study 11 we could found that effectively presented numerical data on hypotension after anesthesia for cesarean section is a retrospective study that aggregated spinal and epidural anesthesia, did not make it clear the definition of hypotension, and included eutrophic and obese pregnant women in the same group hindering analysis of the data. The specific management of those patients should be viewed as fundamental for maternal-fetal safety, and certainly the development of new prospective studies with combined sequential anesthetic techniques of the neuroaxis are fundamental for the determination of safe and effective doses, in order to establish and conduct anesthesia in those patients. We conclude that overweight patients have higher risk of developing hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
1. Saravanakumar K, Rao SG, Cooper GM - Obesity and obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 2006;61:36-48. [ Links ]
2. Braveman FR, Scavone BM, Wong CA et al. - Obstetric Anesthesia, em: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK et al. - Clinical Anesthesia. 6th Ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009;1137-1170. [ Links ]
3. Cardoso MMSC, Yamaguchi ET, Khouri Filho RA - Analgesia para Trabalho de Parto, em: Cangiani LM, Posso IP, Potério GMB et al. - Tratado de Anestesiologia - SAESP. 6ª Ed, São Paulo, Atheneu, 2006;1783-1790. [ Links ]
4. von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Regli A, Bucher E et al. - Impact of spinal anaesthesia and obesity on maternal respiratory function during elective Caesarean section. Anaesthesia, 2004;59:743-749. [ Links ]
5. Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL et al. - Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 1992;76:906-916. [ Links ]
6. Hartmann B, Junger A, Klasen J et al. - The incidence and risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia induction: an analysis with automated data collection. Anesth Analg, 2002;94:1521-1529. [ Links ]
7. Tarkkila P, Isola J - A regression model for identifying patients at high risk of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea during spinal anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1992;36:554-558. [ Links ]
8. Roofthooft E, Van de Velde M - Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2008;21:259-262. [ Links ]
9. Cardoso MMSC, Hirahara JT - Anestesia para Operação Cesariana, em: Cangiani LM, Posso IP, Potério GMB et al. - Tratado de Anestesiologia - SAESP. 6ª Ed, São Paulo, Atheneu, 2006;1791-1804. [ Links ]
10. Morgan Jr GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ - Obstetric Anesthesia, em: Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ - Clinical Anesthesiology. 4th Ed, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2006;890-906. [ Links ]
11. Bamgbade OA, Khalaf WM, Ajai O et al. - Obstetric anaesthesia outcome in obese and non-obese parturients undergoing caesarean delivery: an observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2009;18:221-225. [ Links ]
12. World Health Organization - Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253. [ Links ]
13. Nucci LB, Schmidt MI, Duncan BB et al. - Nutritional status of pregnant women: prevalence and associated pregnancy outcomes. Rev Saude Publica, 2001;35:502-507. [ Links ]
14. Chang AB - Physiologic Changes of Pregnancy. em: Chestnut DH - Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier Mosby, 2004;15-36. [ Links ]
15. Roofthooft E - Anesthesia for the morbidly obese parturient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2009;22:341-346. [ Links ]
16. Veille JC, Hanson R - Obesity, pregnancy, and left ventricular functioning during the third trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994;171:980-983. [ Links ]
17. Vallejo MC - Anesthetic management of the morbidly obese parturient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2007;20:175-180. [ Links ]
18. Tomoda S, Tamura T, Sudo Y et al. - Effects of obesity on pregnant women: maternal hemodynamic change. Am J Perinatol, 1996;13:73-78. [ Links ]
19. Pian-Smith MCM, Datta S, Greene MF - The Diabetic Parturient, em: Datta S - Anesthetic and Obstetric of High-Risk Pregnancy. 3rd Ed, New York, Springer-Verlab, 2004;333-346. [ Links ]
20. Cohn AI, Hart RT, McGraw SR et al. - The Bullard laryngoscope for emergency airway management in a morbidly obese parturient. Anesth Analg, 1995;81:872-873. [ Links ]]
21. Sharwood-Smith G, Drummond GB - Hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia: a lesson from pre-eclampsia. Br J Anaesth, 2009;102:291-294. [ Links ]
22. Soens MA, Birnbach DJ, Ranasinghe JS et al. - Obstetric anesthesia for the obese and morbidly obese patient: an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2008;52:6-19. [ Links ]
Correspondence to: Submitted on March 31, 2010. Received from Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HCFMUSP, Brazil.
Dr. Fernando Souza Nani
Rua Alves Guimarães, 408, Apto 122, Pinheiros
05410-000 - São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Approved on August 2, 2010.
Submitted on March 31, 2010.
Received from Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HCFMUSP, Brazil.