Services on Demand
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Print version ISSN 0034-7094
Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.61 no.1 Campinas Jan./Feb. 2011
José Admirço Lima FilhoI; Eliana Marisa Ganem, TSAII; Bruno Gardélio Pedreira de Cerqueira, TSAIII
IPost-Graduation. Anesthesiologist at the Clínica de Anestesia de Salvador and Coordina tor of the Anesthesiology Department of Hospital Geral Roberto Santos
IIAssisting Professor, Physician at the Anesthesiology Department of FMB-Unesp
IIIMaster's Degree in Anesthesiology from FMB-Unesp. Anesthesiologist at the Clínica de Anestesia de Salvador
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Difficulty intubating is a cause of mortality in anesthesiology and it can be related to obesity. The diagnosis of difficult intubation contributes for successful airways management. However, parameters that predict difficult airways are not well established. Mallampati classification, the interincisor gap, neck circumference, thyromental distance, and the presence of obstructive sleep apnea, are parameters that can indicate difficult intubation. Surgical treatment of obesity provides reduction in body mass index (BMI) with stabilization after about 2 years. The objective of the present study was to reevaluate the parameters described above and compare them with pre-surgical values.
METHODS: The BMI, Mallampati classification, neck circumference, interincisor gap, thyromental distance, and the degree of obstructive sleep apnea in polysomnography were evaluated in 51 patients of both genders in the preoperative period. Two years after the surgery and reduction of the BMI to < 35 kg.m-2, predictor factors of difficult airways were reevaluated by another anesthesiologist who knew the patients' BMI before surgery. Nine patients were excluded. The new reevaluation was performed, and for those who did not have another polysomnography the somnolence scale of Epiworth was applied.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients were reevaluated. They showed a reduction in BMI and neck circumference, and an increase in both interincisor gap and thyromental distance. Only one patient showed a reduction in Mallampati scale, and only 4 patients performed polysomnography.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of the BMI allows for an increased interincisor gap, thyromental distance, and reduction in neck circumference. Mallampati classification remains the same.
Keywords: Obesity; Body Mass Index; Airway Management; Intubation.
Difficulty intubating is a cause of mortality in anesthesiology, and the identification of factors that predispose it is fundamental to prevent it.
Factors for prevention of difficult intubation are not well established and at least 30% of difficult airways are undetected 2,3.
Mallampati classification, interincisor gap, neck circumference, thyromental distance, among others are used to identify probable difficult intubation 4,5.
Some groups of patients such as obese patients have a higher probability of difficult intubation. Due to their anatomic and physiologic characteristics they develop oxygen desaturation due to faster hemoglobin than in non-obese patients especially in the supine position 6,7.
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), whose incidence in obese patients varies from 39% to 71%, can be an indicator of difficult intubation being related to a reduction in pharyngeal space and narrowing of the airways due to deposit of fat tissue. Gastroesophageal reflux is more common in obese patients favoring regurgitation and bronchial aspiration 8.
Since the world population of obese people has been increasing, and this could associated with several comorbidities, one would expect an increase in the number of surgical procedures in those patients, and the anesthesiologist must be aware of the peculiarities of obese patients 6.
Surgical treatment of obesity is indicated in patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg.m-2 or > 35 kg.m-2 associated with severe cardiopulmonary comorbidity or severe diabetes, and those who did not lose weight after non-surgical therapeutic treatment 9.
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard for bariatric surgeries because it combines gastric restriction with a minimal degree of malabsorption. This treatment provides a maximal weight reduction around 10 mg.m-2 over 12 to 24 months, which stabilizes in approximately 2 years 8. Reduction of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is the greatest benefit of this treatment 9.
Thus, the objective of the present study was the reevaluation of the airways of obese patients undergone bariatric surgery after they reached a reduction of their BMI using the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, interincisor gap, neck circumference, and degree of OSAS and compare with the values observed in the preoperative period.
After approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Espanhol and signing of the informed consent, 52 patients of both genders with BMI higher than 35 kg.m-2 who underwent bariatric surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation, from April 01, 2004 and May 16, 2007, participated in this study.
Inclusion criteria were patients with BMI > 35 kg.m-2 and at least 24 months after the surgery.
Patients with BMI > 35 kg.m-2 with recent anomaly or trauma in the cervical region, gravidas, and those who refused to participate in the study were excluded.
During the preanesthetic evaluation before bariatric surgery the following parameters were measured: BMI (kg.m-2), neck circumference (at the level of the cricoid cartilage), interincisor gap (with maximal mouth opening), thyromental distance (from the upper margin of the thyroid cartilage to the inferior margin of the mandible with the patient in dorsal decubitus and cervical extension), the degree of OSAS measured by polysomnography, and Mallampati classification (with the patient in the sitting position, after he exposes his/her tongue, without speaking).
All patients in this study were evaluated in the preoperative period and anesthetized by the same anesthesiologist, who did not participate in the post-surgical evaluation two years after bariatric surgery.
After reduction in BMI had been stable the patients were called for reevaluation of their airways, which was performed by another anesthesiologist who only knew the preoperative BMI of the patient.
After verifying the reduction in BMI to below 35 kg.m-2, evaluation of the airways of the patient was performed: Mallampati classification, interincisor gap, thyromental distance, and degree of OSAS.
In cases in which polysomnography was not possible, the Epiworth somnolence scale which evaluates the probability of the patient taking a nap attributing points ranging from zero to three was applied: zero, no chance of taking a nap; 1, a small chance; 2, moderate chance; and 3, increased chance of taking a nap in the following situations:
sitting down, reading
sitting in a public place, without activity
as a passenger in a train, car, or bus
laying down in the afternoon to rest
sitting down, talking to someone
sitting down quietly after lunch, without taking alcoholic beverages
driving in heavy traffic, stopping for a few minutes
The patient does not have somnolence when the sum of the scores is equal to or lower than 10, according to the recommendations of the original publication 10.
The Chi-square (χ2), Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon tests were used in the statistical analysis, and a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Fifty-one obese patients with prior preoperative evaluation of the parameters suggestive of difficult intubation who underwent bariatric surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were selected.
Nine of those patients did not participate in the study: five for refusing to participate, one who was in the seventh month of pregnancy, and three patients who did not show a reduction in BMI at the time of evaluation. Therefore, 42 patients were evaluated.
Table I shows the pre- and postoperative parameters and after reevaluation. Separated by genders, Table II shows the values for male patients and Table III shows the values for female patients, which were statistically significant for reduction of BMI and neck circumference and increase in thyromental distance and interincisor gap. Classes of the Mallampati classification did not change.
Table IV describes the results comparing values according to gender. Figure 1 shows the degree of sleep apnea before the surgery as measured by polysomnography. Only 10% of the study population repeated this exam after reduction in BMI.
Careful preoperative evaluation of patients increases the possibility of detecting parameters that could suggest the presence of difficult airways, but with inadequate sensitivity and specificity 12. Studies analyzing clinical parameters associated with difficult intubation showed sensitivity and positive predictive factor ranging from 33% to 71% 13.
It has been describe in the literature that an increase in BMI, small thyromental distance, short and enlarged neck, macroglossia, and small opening of the mouth are related with intubation 14-19.
The relationship between the distribution of fatty tissue in the thorax and in the anterior region of the neck and difficulty intubating can compromise management of the airways. In android obesity, more common in males, a predominance of fat in the superior portion of the body is seen while in gynoid obesity accumulation of fat is seen in inferior portions of the body. Consequently it seems that access to the airways of male patients is more difficult, since the fat tissue deposited in the cervical region limits its mobility and reduces the space of the oral cavity 20-22.
Using magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the conformity of the face and neck an excess of fat in the submandibular region was observed even in patients with normal BMI. The accumulation of fat in the neck is more pronounced in males although the percentage of body fat is higher in females 23.
When the amount of fat in the anterior cervical region of obese patients was quantified by ultrasound and related with the difficulty in handling their airways, it was demonstrated that the higher the concentration of adipose tissue the higher the chances of difficulty to intubate. Neck circumference is closely related to the accumulation of fat in the cervical region 24.
Increased neck circumference is a predictor of difficult intubation25. In the present study, neck circumference values were not higher than 60 cm. Mean prior levels were 42.2 cm and after stabilization of weight loss they were reduced to 15.2%. The reduction in neck circumference is related with the reduction in adipose tissue in the anterior region of the neck, which can facilitate manipulation of the area and consequently its management.
Thyromental distance is an indicator of the mandibular space where the tongue will be displaced by the laryngoscope 26.
In the present study mean values of thyromental distance prior to bariatric surgery were 7.9 cm and after the surgery this parameter increased by 11.4% showing that the reduction of fat in the submandibular region favors better neck extension.
Interincisor gap evaluates mouth opening. It indicates the mobility of the temporomandibular joint and the degree of difficulty to insert the laryngoscope. A consensus between this parameter and difficulty to intubate does not exist 27. Interincisor gap increased by 33.3% in the present study. Better mouth opening favors manipulation of the oral cavity and facilitates laryngoscopy.
From Mallampati classification one can estimate the relationship between the size of the tongue and oral cavity, the possibility of dislocating the tongue by the laryngoscope blade, and whether mouth opening allows tracheal intubations. Besides pharyngeal structures Mallampati classification also evaluates neck and head mobility 28-31.
Decreased visibility of oropharyngeal structures is associated to greater difficulty in direct laryngoscopy. There is a correlation between Mallampati classification and Cormack and Lehane score for the diagnosis of difficult laryngoscopy 28.
In obesity, when weight gain is followed by an increase in the size of the tongue so that the proportion between the tongue and pharyngeal structures are altered, the possibility of difficult laryngoscopy exists. Incapability of visualizing the posterior pharyngeal wall in this population is two times higher than in non-obese patients. There is a positive correlation between BMI and higher Mallampati classification 32.
In the present study, only one male patient showed reduction in Mallampati classification after reduction of the BMI. This patient went from class IV to class III. The lack of reduction in Mallampati classification shows visualization of posterior laryngeal structures not related to accumulation of fat in the anterior neck region and for this reason weight loss did not reflect in changes in this parameter.
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome occurs during sleep due to changes in the airways. Muscle tonus is decreased, leading to collapse of the pharynx and fall of the tongue. Partial or complete obstruction of the airways, similar to that observed during sedation, occurs as a consequence; this could be related with difficult intubation 33,34. An association between obesity and OSAS exists 35.
In the present study, all patients performed preoperative polysomnography. However, after reduction in BMI only 10% of the patients redid this test since the remaining 90% did not show symptoms of OSAS anymore.
Epiworth scale which evaluates somnolence subjectively was applied to all patients after reduction of the BMI. However, this scale does not allow correlation with polysomnography results, considered the gold standard for detection of OSAS.
In this study, only one male patient had an Epiworth score compatible with somnolence. Before bariatric surgery, this patient had OSAS and he continued with the same symptoms after reduction of the BMI.
To conclude, reduction in BMI after bariatric surgery in obese patients of both genders resulted in an increase in both thyromental distance and interincisor gap, reduction in neck circumference, and maintenance of Mallampati classification.
01. Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H et al. - Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg, 2003;97:595-600. [ Links ]
02. Rosenblatt WH - Decision making in airway evaluation. ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiol, 2004;32:179-186. [ Links ]
03. Rosenblatt WH - Preoperative planning of airway management in critical care patients.Crit Care Med, 2004;32(4 suppl):S186-192. [ Links ]
04. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD et al. - A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J, 1985;32:429-434. [ Links ]
05. Benumof JL - The ASA difficult airway algorithm: new thoughts and considerations. ASA Ann Refresher Course Lect, 1999;134:1-7. [ Links ]
06. Brodsky JB - Anesthesia for bariatric surgery. ASA Refresher Courses Anesthesiol, 2005;33:49-63. [ Links ]
07. Pieracci FM, Barie PS, Pomp A - Critical care of the bariatric patient. Crit Care Med, 2006; 34:1796-1804. [ Links ]
08. Luce JM - Respiratory complications of obesity. Chest, 1980;78:626-631. [ Links ]
09. Ogunnaike BO, Jones SB, Jones DB et al. - Anesthetic considerations for bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg, 2002;95:1793-1805. [ Links ]
10. Mullen JT, Moorman DW, Davenport DL - The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery. Ann Surg, 2009;250:166-172. [ Links ]
11. Johns MW - A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep, 1991;14:540- 545. [ Links ]
12. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1269-1277. [ Links ]
13. Arné J, Descoins P, Fusciardi J et al. - Preoperative assessment for difficult intubation in general and ENT surgery: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Br J Anaesth, 1998;80:140-146. [ Links ]
14. Cass NM, James NR, Lines V - Difficult direct laryngoscopy complicating intubation for anaesthesia. Br Med J, 1956;1:488-489. [ Links ]
15. Chou H-C, Wu T-L - Mandibulohyoid distance in difficult laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth, 1993;71:335-339. [ Links ]
16. Chung F, Crago RR - Sleep apnoea syndrome and anaesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J, 1982;29:439-445. [ Links ]
17. Patil VU, Stchling LC, Zauder HL - Fiberoptic Endoscopy in Anesthesia. Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers; 1983. [ Links ]
18. Davies RJO, Stradling JR - The relationship between neck circumference, radiographic pharyngeal anatomy, and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J, 1990;3:509-514. [ Links ]
19. Hoffstein V, Szalai JP - Predictive value of clinical features in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep, 1993:16:118-122. [ Links ]
20. Auler Jr JOC, Giannini CG, Saragiotto DF - Desafios no manuseio perioperatório de pacientes obesos mórbidos: como prevenir complicações. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2003;53:227-236. [ Links ]
21. Ashwell M, Chinn S, Stalley S et al. - Female fat distribution: a simple classification based on two circumference measurements. Int J Obes, 1982;6:143-152. [ Links ]
22. Abraham S, Johnson CL - Prevalence of severe obesity in adults in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr, 1980; 33:364-369. [ Links ]
23. Whittle AT, Marshall I, Mortimore IL et al. - Neck soft tissue and fat distribution: comparison between normal men and women by magnetic resonance imaging. Thorax, 1999;54:323-328. [ Links ]
24. Ezri T, Gewürtz G, Sessler DI et al. - Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients by ultrasound quantification of anterior neck soft tissue. Anaesthesia, 2003;58:1111-1114. [ Links ]
25. Gonzalez H, Minville V, Delanoue K et al. - The importance of increased neck circumference to intubation difficulties in obese patients. Anesth Analg, 2008;106:1132-1136. [ Links ]
26. Baker PA, Depuydt A, Thompson JM - Thyromental distance measurement - fingers don't rule. Anaesthesia, 2009:64:878-882. [ Links ]
27. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T et al. - Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology, 2005;103:429-437. [ Links ]
28. Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA et al. - Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth, 1988;61:211-216. [ Links ]
29. Randell T - Prediction of difficult intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1996;40:1016-1023. [ Links ]
30. Janssens M, Hartstein G - Management of difficult intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2001;18:3-12. [ Links ]
31. Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T et al. - A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth Analg, 2006;102:1867-1878. [ Links ]
32. Loadsman JA, Hillman DR - Anaesthesia and sleep apnoea. Br J Anaesth, 2001;86:254-266. [ Links ]
33. Benumof JL - Obstructive sleep apnea in adult obese patients: implications for airway management. Anesthesiol Clin North Am, 2002;20:789-811. [ Links ]
34. Frappier J, Guenoun T, Journois D et al. - Airway management using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for the morbidly obese patient. Anesth Analg, 2003;96:1510-1515. [ Links ]
Correspondence to: Submitted on June 28, 2010. Received from the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu da Universidade Estadual Paulista (FMB-Unesp), Brazil.
Dr. José Admirço Lima Filho
Rua Oswaldo Valente 745, Itaigara
41815090 - Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
Approved on July 27, 2010.
Submitted on June 28, 2010.
Received from the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu da Universidade Estadual Paulista (FMB-Unesp), Brazil.