SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 issue3Challenges in pain researchRopivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia; hyperbaric or hypobaric? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia

Print version ISSN 0034-7094

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.62 no.3 Campinas May/June 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942012000300002 

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES

 

Extracorporeal circulation interference on emergence from anesthesia in patients submitted to myocardial revascularization

 

 

Ricardo Antonio Guimarães Barbosa, TSAI; Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson, TSAII; Luciana Moraes dos Santos, TSAIII; Marilde de Albuquerque PiccioniIV; Maria José Carvalho Carmona, TSAV

IPhD; Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo (FM-USP); Professor, Medical School, Centro Universitário Lucíadas (UNILUS); Medical Supervisor, Anesthesiology Service at the Radiology Institute at Hospital das Clínicas, FM-USP
IITE-AMIB; PhD, FM-USP; Medical Supervisor at Surgical ICU, Anesthesia Division at Central Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, FM-USP; Medical Coordinator, Surgical Patients Critical Care Unit, Anesthesiology Service, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo
IIITE-AMIB; PhD, FM-USP; Anesthesiologist, Hospital das Clínicas, FM-USP, Ribeirão Preto
IVPhD, FM-USP; Medical Doctor Assistant, Instituto do Coração at Hospital das Clinicas, FM-USP
VTE-AMIB; Associate Professor, Anesthesiology, FM-USP; Director, Anesthesia Division at Central Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, FM-USP

Correspondence to

 

 


SUMMARY

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) may change drug pharmacokinetics as well as brain function. The objectives of this study are to compare emergence time and postoperative sedation intensity assessed by the bispectral index (BIS) and the Ramsay sedation scale in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization (MR) with or without ECC.
METHOD: Ten patients undergoing MR with ECC (ECC group) and 10 with no ECC (no-ECC group) were administered with sufentanyl, propofol 2.0 µg.mL-1 and pancuronium target controlled infusion. After surgery, propofol infusion was reduced to 1 µg.mL-1 and suspended when extubation was indicated. Patients BIS, Ramsay scale and time to wake up were assessed.
RESULTS: The ECC group showed lower BIS values beginning at 60 minutes after surgery (no-ECC = 66 ± 13 and ECC = 53 ± 14, p = 0.01) until 120 minutes after infusion (no-ECC = 85 ± 8 and ECC = 73 ± 12, p = 0.02). Sedation level measured by the Ramsay scale was higher in the ECC group at 30 minutes after the end of the surgery (no-ECC = 5 ± 1 and ECC = 6 ± 0, p = 0.021), at the end of infusion (no-ECC = 5 ± 1 and ECC = 6 ± 1, p = 0.012) and 5 minutes after the end of infusion (no-ECC = 4 ± 1 and ECC = 5 ± 0.42, p = 0.039). Emergence from anesthesia time was higher in the ECC group (no-ECC = 217 ± 81 and ECC = 319 ± 118, p = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher intensity of sedation after the end of surgery and a longer wake up time in ECC group, suggesting changes in the pharmacokinetics of propofol or effects of ECC on central nervous system.

Keywords: deep sedation; extracorporeal circulation; pharmacokinetics; propofol.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) may change plasma concentrations of drugs used during anesthesia for cardiac surgery, as well as cause effects on the central nervous system leading patients to a higher sedation level, which changes patients' emergence from anesthesia time1.

Hemodilution, blood loss, fluid mobilization, and hypothermia effects may change drug pharmacokinetics2. A reduction in the hepatic blood flow may change biotransformation of drugs highly extracted by the liver, affecting its elimination3,4. On the other hand, in the cardiac surgery without ECC, volemic expansion with crystalloids promotes hemodilution and alteration in protein plasma concentrations and in plasma protein binding5-7. Propofol pharmacokinetics profile favors a quick recovery from anesthesia, and its short action time facilitates administration through continue infusion. Pharmacokinetics software model coupled to the infusion pump allows a drug administration at a rate capable of maintaining a constant plasma concentration using target controlled infusion (TCI). It results in the maintenance of the hypnotic effect for the desirable period of time8, and the quick recovery after infusion interruption9. The ECC effects in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with ECC or the hemodilution effects in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization without ECC promote pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics changes on propofol considered to be controversial10-12. The objective of this study was to assess the interference of ECC on emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with and without ECC, assessing patients postoperative sedation level and wake up time, additionally assessing the correlation between bispectral index (BIS) monitoring and clinical assessment (sedation scale by Ramsay et al.13).

 

METHODS

Study protocol was approved by the institutional Medical Ethics Committee. After clarifications regarding the study's general objectives, patients signed the informed consent form.

Were studied 20 patients with chronic coronary insufficiency, candidates to myocardial revascularization elective surgery, with left ventricle ejection fraction superior to 50%. Patients were randomically allocated in two non-randomized groups according to surgical practice: Myocardial Revascularization with Extracorporeal Circulation Group (ECC Group) (n = 10) and Myocardial Revascularization without Extracorporeal Circulation Group (no-ECC Group) (n = 10).

Pre-anesthetic medication consisted of oral midazolam 0.1 to 0.2 mg.kg-1 dose, 30 minutes before surgery, reaching the maximum dose of 15 mg. Patients were monitored in the surgery room with electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, invasive blood pressure and central venous catheter.

Anesthesia induction was conducted with propofol through specific infusion pump (Diprifusor®, AstraZeneca, USA) with a 30-second infusion initial time and 2.0 µg.mL-1 as the target concentration during the entire surgery, and sufentanyl initially infused at the 0.5 µg.kg-1 dose, followed by a 0.5 µg.kg-1.hour-1continuous infusion through infusion pump (Anne, Abbott®, USA) specially programmed with the patient's weight and the specific drug. Continuous infusion was sustained during the entire surgery. Muscle relaxation was obtained with 0.1 to 0.2 mg.kg-1 pancuronium bromide dose. Manual ventilation was used under mask and tracheal intubation with proper diameter tube, followed by mechanical controlled ventilation (Cicero Dragger®, Germany) with 8 mL.kg-1 current volume, 10 respiratory incursions per minute for the respiratory frequency, I:E ratio = 1:2 and FiO2 = 0.6 (oxygen, compressed air and PEEP = 5 cm H2O).

After anticoagulation administration with sodium heparin 500 U.kg-1, ECC started using roller pump or centrifugal pump, with membrane oxygenator and initial perfusion of 1,600 mL Ringer Lactato solution. Perfusion flow was 60 to 80 mL.kg-1. min-1, using moderate hypothermia at 32ºC to 34ºC and serial gasometry control. During ECC, hypnosis was maintained with target controlled propofol continuous infusion aiming to keep a 2 µg.mL-1 plasma concentration.

At the end of the surgery, propofol target concentration was changed to 1.0 µg.mL-1. It was maintained constant during transportation to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) until the moment tracheal extubation was indicated. Extubation was indicated when patients were considered to be normothermal, hemodynamically stable, conscious and showing response to verbal commands.

Postoperative sedation intensity was assessed by bispectral index (BIS) and Ramsay sedation scale. Ramsay scale is used to assess patient sedation level. It has been described by Michael Ramsay as part of a study about Alphaxalone/Alphadolone (Althensin) anesthetic effect published in 197413. It comprehends values to be attributed from 0 to 6, observing responses given by the patient after stimulus:

Level 1: anxious, restless;

Level 2: cooperative, orientated, tranquil;

Level 3: sleepy, responding to commands;

Level 4: sleeping, brisk response to glabelar or vigorous sound stimulus;

Level 5: sleeping, sluggish response to glabelar or vigorous sound stimulus;

Level 6: sleeping, no response to stimulus.

Assessment of postoperative sedation intensity was performed using the BIS and Ramsay sedation scale in different moments:

1) At the end of the surgery;

2) 5 minutes after the end of the surgery;

3) 15 minutes after the end of the surgery;

4) 30 minutes after the end of the surgery;

5) 60 minutes after the end of the surgery;

6) 120 minutes after the end of the surgery;

7) at the end of the Propofol infusion.

When patients were hemodynamically stable and normothermal, propofol infusion was interrupted so that the patients could be extubated as fast as possible. Assessment of the BIS and Ramsay sedation scale continued at the moments described as follows in the two studied groups (ECC Group and no-ECC group):

1) 5 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

2) 15 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

3) 30 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

4) 60 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

5) 120 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

6) 240 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

7) 360 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

8) 480 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion;

9) 720 minutes after the end of the Propofol infusion.

Patient wake up time was also assessed, considered to be the time between the end of the propofol infusion and the moment the patient started to respond to verbal commands.

Groups were compared considering weight, height, body mass index, surgery time, patient intubation time and extracorporeal circulation time in the ECC group.

Statistical analysis

Studied sample size was calculated to detect a reduction in the complete emergence time when sedation is interrupted at 300 minutes in the ECC group and at 200 minutes in the

no-ECC group, considering a standard deviation of 75 minutes in both groups. For this estimation, a test power of 80% and p value = 0.05 were considered, as well as a required sample of at least nine patients in each group. Normal distribution of data was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test, and kurtosis and asymmetry tests. Data regarding age, weight, height, body mass index, surgery time, tracheal intubation time and complete wake up time were assessed by the Student t test for non-paired samples. The behavior of BIS values throughout the time in the groups with and without ECC was analyzed using a two-way variance analysis for repeated measures, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test to detect differences between the groups at several time-points. The behavior of the Ramsay scale values between the groups were compared at several time-points of interest using the Wilcoxon test, as a result of Ramsay scale's values non-normal distribution. The Spearman test was used to assess the correlation between BIS and Ramsay sedation scale values. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. All analyses were conducted using the statistical program STATA 11 (STATACorpTM, Tx, USA) and Sigmastat 3.5 (Systat Software Inc.TM, Ca, USA).

 

RESULTS

The two groups were compared considering weight, height, age and body mass index (BMI). Regarding the intubation time and emergence from anesthesia, the ECC group showed to have greater values for these variables, with a significant difference (Table I). The surgery time was greater in the no-ECC group, though showing no significant difference. All patients reported complete amnesia during the surgical procedure. Population BIS mean values were pointed out versus time as illustrated in Figure 1.

 

 

 

 

Regarding BIS, significant differences were identified between the ECC and no-ECC groups at the following timepoints: 60 minutes after the end of the surgery, at the end of the infusion, and 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after the end of the infusion, in which the ECC group showed BIS values smaller than the no-ECC group values (Figure 1).

Higher postoperative sedation intensity was observed in the ECC group patients assessed by the Ramsay sedation scale, with a significant difference at the following time-points: 30 minutes after the end of the surgery, at the end of the propofol infusion, and 5 minutes after the end of the propofol infusion (Figure 2).

 

 

In all cases, when an association between Ramsay sedation scale and BIS values was identified, such association had been considered to be inversed, i.e., the greater the BIS value was, the smaller was the Ramsay values (Figure 3)

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

The results obtained showed that the group of patients undergoing myocardial a revascularization with ECC differed their behavior regarding the emergence from anesthesia and postoperative sedation intensity after the interruption of the target controlled infusion.

The greater postoperative sedation intensity observed in the ECC group may be justified by hypothermia experienced by the patients in this group and by the central nervous system depression caused by ECC. Hypothermia also causes a reduction in the hepatic blood flow with consequent reduction in propofol metabolism. All these factors may increase patient wake up time (calculation obtained between the end of the propofol infusion and the moment when the patient first responded to verbal commands) in this group, justifying the greater postoperative tracheal intubation time (Table I). The greatest sedation level observed in the ECC group shows a possible greater central nervous system depression caused by the ECC.

BIS is related to the anesthesia hypnotic component, without considering patient response movements or hemodynamic response to painful stimulus, providing the deepness level of the anesthesia14,15. In the present study, monitoring results demonstrated an immediate BIS reduction after the anesthesia induction in the two investigated groups, a fact that could be explained by the rapid action start and the rapid distribution of the hypnotic agent to the central nervous system. For the patients with coronary disease assessed in this study, the propofol infused dose was adequate for hypnosis.

The anesthesiologist may define propofol target concentrations that range from 2 to 6 µg.mL-1 for general anesthesia or 0.5 to 1.5 µg.mL-1 for sedation. Pharmacokinetics models of target controlled infusions rapidly reach the desired propofol target concentrations16,17. However, caution must be taken when administering propofol infusion until the desired effect is obtained due to the subjects' variability regarding propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics18.

Patient response to propofol during surgery is highly variable and infusion rate and administration dose will be determined according to patients' individual needs. Factors that influence the propofol dose are: age, weight, pre-existing diseases, surgery type and concomitant medical treatments.

The short duration of propofol action of approximately 5 to 8 minutes may be explained by the drug elevated clearance and quick distribution. Propofol concentration at the action site also quickly increases due to the rapid balance reached between plasma and brain concentration (< 3 minutes). These propofol pharmacokinetics features lead to a fast manifestation of the hypnotic effect and loss of consciousness. Notwithstanding the compartmental model chosen, propofol distribution at the action site is considered to be nearly instantaneous, and the drug free fraction controls the pharmacological effect intensity. Preceding studies reported up to a three fold increase in the drug free fraction during cardiac surgery with ECC6. An increase in the free drug fraction of approximately 300% may contribute to ensure a rapid elevation in propofol concentration at the action site, with relevant effect in the pharmacokinetics of this agent.

Some studies have also showed a greater hypnotic effect of propofol as a result of the ECC19. For this reason, ECC brain effects may interfere in the hypnosis level.

Results obtained in previous studies confirm that sufentanyl in the low concentrations used does not interfere in the propofol effect measured by BIS20.

Patient clinical assessment during emergence from anesthesia at the ICU is extremely important during the postoperative time of a cardiac surgery, as it enables patient early extubation. This assessment performed using the sedation scale and also the BIS enables a better follow-up of the patients.

According to the present study, sedation intensity as measured by BIS was greater in the ECC group when compared to the no-ECC group, suggesting changes in the propofol pharmacokinetics or in the ECC secondary effects on the level of sedation.

 

REFERENCES

1. Barbosa RAG, Santos SRCJ, White PF et al. - Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on propofol pharmacokinetics and bispectral index during coronary surgery. Clinics, 2009;64:215-221.         [ Links ]

2. Mets B - The pharmacokinetics of anesthetic drugs and adjuvants during cardiopulmonary bypass. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000;44:261-273.         [ Links ]

3. Gouke CR, Keaveny JP, Kay B, Healy TE, Ryan M - The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet, 1982;7:234-251.         [ Links ]

4. Buylaert WA, Herregods LL, Mortier EP, Bogaert MG - Cardiopulmonary bypass and the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet, 1989;17:10-26.         [ Links ]

5. Wood M - Plasma drug binding: implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg, 1979;65:786-804.         [ Links ]

6. Wood M - Plasma drug binding: implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg, 1986;65:786-804.         [ Links ]

7. Hiraoka H, Yamamoto K, Morita T, Goto F, Horiuchi R - Changes in drug plasma concentrations of an extensively bound and highly extracted drug, propofol, in reponse to altered plasma binding. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2004;75:324-330.         [ Links ]

8. Bailey JM, Mora, CT, Shafer SL - Pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Anesthesiology, 1996;84:1288-1297.         [ Links ]

9. White PF - Intravenous anesthesia ana analgesia: what is the role of target-controlled infusion (TCI). J Clin Anesth, 1996;8:26-28.         [ Links ]

10. Massey NJ, Sherry KM, Oldroyd S, Peaccock JE - Pharmacokinetics of infusion of propofol during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth, 1990; 65:475-479.         [ Links ]

11. Lee HS, Khoo YM, Chua BC, Tan SS, Chew SL - Pharmacokinetics of propofol infusion in Asian patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ther Drug Monit, 1995;17:336-341.         [ Links ]

12. Hammaren E, Yli-Hankala A, Rosenberg PH, Hynynem M - Cardiopulmonary bypass-induced changes in plasma concentrations of propofol and in auditory evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth, 1996;77:360-364.         [ Links ]

13. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R - Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J, 1974;2:656-659.         [ Links ]

14. Fisher DM - Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic Bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology, 2000;93:1336-1344.         [ Links ]

15. Sigl JC, Chamoun NG - An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram. J Clin Monit, 1994;10:392-404.         [ Links ]

16. White PF - Intravenous anesthesia and analgesia: what is the role of target-controlled infusion (TCI). J Clin Anesth, 1996;8:26-28.         [ Links ]

17. Kenny GNC, Sutcliffe N - European perspective. In: White PF. Textbook of intravenous anesthesia. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1997; pp.527-537.         [ Links ]

18. Glass PSA, Markhan K, Ginsberg B, Hawkins ED - Propofol concentrations required for surgery. Anesthesiology, 1989;71:A273.         [ Links ]

19. Yoshitani H, Takeuchi M, Sakamoto K, Akasaka T, Yoshida K, Yoshikawa J - Effect of one or more co-morbid conditions on diagnostic accuracy of coronary flow velocity reserve for detecting significant left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Heart, 2005;91:1294-1298.         [ Links ]

20. Lysakowski C, Dumont L, Pellegrini M, Clergue F, Tassony E - Effects of fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil on loss of consciousness and bispectrum index during propofol induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth, 2001;86:523-527.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson, MD
Divisão de Anestesia
Av. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 155 Prédio dos Ambulatórios 8º andar Bloco 3 Cerqueira César
05403900 - São Paulo, SP, Brazil
E-mail: malbouisson@gmail.com

 

Submitted on March 29, 2011.
Approved on August 3, 2011.

 

Received from Instituto do Coração at Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School at Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.