SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue1Do metoclopramide and ondansetrone alter mivacurium-induced neuromuscular blockade? - a randomised trialDetermination of the minimum effective volume of 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia

Print version ISSN 0034-7094

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.64 no.1 Campinas Jan./Feb. 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.03.019 

Scientific Article

Intravenous clonidine administration and its ability to reduce pulmonary arterial pressure in patients undergoing heart surgery

Benedito Barbosa Joãoa  b 

José Luis Gomes do Amaralc 

Ronaldo Machado Buenob 

David Ferezc 

Luiz Fernando dos Reis Falcãoc 

Marcelo Vaz Pereza 

Itamar Souza de Oliveira-Júniorc 

a Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

b Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

c Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Evaluate the ability of clonidine to reduce pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing heart surgery, either by reducing the pressure values from the direct measurement of pulmonary arterial pressure or by reducing or eliminating the need for intraoperative dobutamine and nitroprusside.

Method:

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study conducted in 30 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension type 2 undergoing cardiac surgery. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure and dosage of dobutamine and sodium nitroprusside were assessed four times: before intravenous administration of clonidine (2 µg/kg) or placebo (T0), 30 min after tested treatment and before cardiopulmonary bypass (T1), immediately after CPB (T2), 10 min after protamine injection (T3).

Results:

There were no significant differences regarding mean pulmonary arterial pressure at any time of evaluation. There was no significant difference between groups regarding other variables, such as mean systemic arterial pressure, heart rate, total dose of dobutamine, total dose of sodium nitroprusside, and need for fentanyl.

Conclusion:

Data analysis from patients included in this study allows us to conclude that intra-venous clonidine (2 µg/kg) was not able to reduce the mean pulmonary arterial pressure inpatients with pulmonary hypertension in group 2 (pulmonary venous hypertension), undergoing heart surgery, or reduce or eliminate the need for intraoperative administration of dobutamineand sodium nitroprusside.

Key words: Clonidine; Pulmonary hypertension; Heart surgery

Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a chronic disease defined by high mean pulmonary arterial pressure above 25 mmHg at rest or 30 mmHg on exertion. Due to its varied etiology, PH is associated with three major deleterious phenomena: vascular remodeling, hypoxic vasoconstriction, and in situ thrombosis. PH is difficult to control and evolves with hypoxemia, increased resistance to ejection of blood by the right ventricle (RV), RV failure, and death.1

PH is classified into five groups: (I) pulmonary arterial hypertension (includes the idiopathic form); (II) pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart diseases; (III) pulmonary hypertension associated with respiratory disease and/or hypoxemia; (IV) pulmonary hypertension due to chronic thrombotic and/or embolic disease; and (V) miscellaneous group.1

PH is most often found in group II patients, as a result of left ventricle (LV) failure associated with other common heart disease progression, such as valvular heart disease and coronary artery disease.2 Myocardial failure makes the LV unable to eject blood into the systemic circulation that reaches the left heart through the pulmonary veins. The high pressure of the pulmonary venous bed is transmitted backward to the arterial system. For no other reason, PH of group II is referred to as pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH).3

Anesthesia in these patients is an enormous challenge because it is necessary to control both the ventricular disease and pulmonary hypertension. To face it, various combinations of drugs are used, including the association of inotropic dobutamine (DBT) and the vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (NTP), which is one of the more frequently used. However, to be effective, it is often necessary to use high doses of these agents. Undesirable effects may arise, such as tachycardia with the use of dobutamine or increased intracranial pressure, coronary steal, intrapulmonary shunt, and metabolic acidosis with sodium nitroprusside.4 Thus, the pharmacological options available are not without side effects, which justify the interest for new therapeutic options.

Clonidine, a α2-adrenergic, imidazole agonist, was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1960s. This drug was first proposed as a nasal decongestant, but soon its systemic effects became known, such as hypotension, bradycardia, and sedation.5

Due to the hypotensive effect of clonidine, which decreases the exocytosis of noradrenaline in the synaptic cleft, both in the central and peripheral nervous system,6 it is now prescribed for hypertension management. In recent decades, this agent was studied as an adjunct to anesthesia. The advantages of clonidine in this context were recognized and its use spread also in the field of anesthesia in cardiac surgery. Among other benefits, clonidine is known to reduce the need for opioids intra- and postoperatively, which allows early tracheal extubation and shortens the duration of mechanical ventilation; hemodynamic stability at lower levels of circulating catecholamines; increased diuresis due to inhibition of the release of antidiuretic hormone (ADH); and release of atrial natriuretic factor.6

The presence of α2-adrenergic receptors in lung tissues7-9 and its central hypotensive action seem to indicate that clonidine may also be useful for treating PH patients undergoing heart surgery.

Methods

After approval by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital São Paulo (Unifesp) and Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa (São Paulo-SP) and obtaining signed informed consent from all participants, 30 patients of both sexes, physical status ASA II or III, aged between 18 and 80 years, with pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart disease were enrolled in the study between January 2009 and December 2010. Due to the expiration date of the batch of drugs, one patient was excluded from the study.

Patients underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass for valvular correction or myocardial revascularization.

The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension was previously confirmed by right heart catheterization and defined by mean pulmonary arterial pressure greater than 25 mmHg at rest.

After fasting for 8 h, the patients were taken to the operating room without receiving pre-medication. In the operating room, they were monitored with electrocardioscope on DII and V5 derivations and, pulse oximetry, and for noninvasive blood pressure. All patients underwent venipuncture and intravenous administration of 3 mg midazolam. After this step, left or right radial artery was cannulated with a catheter caliber 20G for direct blood pressure measurement and blood sample collection for laboratory testing.

Anesthesia consisted of preoxygenation for 3 min, followed by administration of fentanyl (10 μg/kg), etomidate (0.4 mg/kg), pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg), lidocaine (1 mg/kg), facemask ventilation with 100% oxygen for 5-7 min, followed by intubation and maintenance with 1% isoflurane in oxygen and air (1:1). After tracheal intubation, monitoring was complemented by analysis of anesthetic gases, capnometry, and capnography.

Intraoperatively, we try to maintain mean arterial pressure between 50 and 80 mmHg with additional doses of fentanyl (5 μg/kg) and, if necessary, sodium nitroprusside. Cases of hypotension were treated according to the etiology, either with volume management or with inotropic, chronotropic or vasopressor agents.

After sternotomy and retractor placement, an 18G teflon catheter was placed under direct vision into the pulmonary artery to allow direct measurement of pulmonary artery pressure.

During cardiopulmonary bypass, in order to keep patients under hypnosis and immobility, midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg) were administered again. At the end of this stage, all patients were treated with dobutamine (5-10 μg/kg/min), in order to ensure hemodynamic stability (compensating for impaired myocardial contractility by ischemia-reperfusion and heart manipulation during cardiopulmonary bypass).

Categorical variables, such as age, weight, gender, and diagnosis were evaluated. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), and doses of sodium nitroprusside, dobutamine, and fentanyl were recorded at the following times:

  • After sternum opening and retractor placement, before clonidine (T0).

  • Thirty minutes after clonidine administration (T1).

  • At the end of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2).

  • Ten minutes after protamine (T3).

Immediately after the first measurements (T0), a coded solution (clonidine 2 μg/kg or placebo) was administered to every patient using slow intravenous injection. The tested solution decoding was made just before data analysis, as explained in the annex.

Sample size calculation was made considering the hypothesis of 15% decrease in pulmonary pressure with a standard deviation of 5.5. To obtain a test with a significance level of 5% and 80% power, 14 patients were required for the treatment group and 14 for the placebo group. Calculations were made with BioEstat 3.0.

In principle, all variables were analyzed descriptively. For quantitative variables, the analysis was performed by observing the minimum and maximum values and calculating averages, standard deviations, and medians. For qualitative variables, absolute and relative frequencies were calculated.

To compare the means of both groups, the Student's t-test was used. When the normality assumption was rejected, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used.10

To test homogeneity between proportions, chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used (when expected frequencies were less than 5).10

To analyze the groups’ behavior considering the conditions studied, analysis of variance with repeated measures was used,11 which consists of adjusting a multivariate linear model from which the following hypotheses were tested:

  • H01: the average response profiles corresponding to the groups are parallel, i.e., there is no interaction between group factor and valuation condition factor (T0, T1, T2 and T3).

  • H02: the average response profiles are coincident; i.e., there is no group factor effect group.

  • H03: the average response profiles are parallel to the abscissas’ axis; i.e., there is no evaluation condition factor effect.

When the assumption of data normality was rejected, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (comparison of both groups at each time) and Friedman's test (comparison of times in each group) were applied.10

The significance level of 5% was used for the tests.

Results

Twenty-nine patients, aged between 27 and 75 years (mean 55.10 years, with a standard deviation of 10.54 years and a median of 56 years), were evaluated, of whom 17 were male (58.6%) and 12 (41.4%) female. The patients were divided into two groups: placebo (n = 14) and clonidine (n = 15).

Table 1 shows the comparison of groups regarding categorical variables, and it was noted that the groups did not differ significantly in age, weight, sex, and diagnosis.

Table 1 Categorical variables. 

Variable Category Group p
    Clonidine (n = 15) Placebo (n = 14)  
Age   52.4+11.7 57.9+8.6 0.167a
Weight   67.5 + 13.8 68.2 + 12.5 0.880a
Sex Female   5 (33.3%)   7 (50.0%) 0.362b
  Male 10 (66.7%)   7 (50.0%)  
  ASD/COI   0 (0.0%)   1 (7.1%)  
  DML   5 (33.3%)   5 (35.7%)  
  AS   1 (6.7%)   0 (0.0%)  
Diagnosis SM   4 (26.7%)   3 (21.4%) 0.675c
  MI   5 (33.3%)   2 (14.3%)  
  MI/COI   0 (0.0%)   1 (7.1%)  
  AR   0 (0.0%)   1 (7.1%)  
  AR/MI   0 (0.0%)   1 (7.1%)  

ASD, atrial septal defect; COI, coronary insufficiency; DML, double mitral lesion; AS, aortic stenosis; MS, mitral stenosis; MI, mitral insufficiency; AR, aortic regurgitation.

a Descriptive level of probability of Student’s t-test.

b Descriptive level of probability of the chi-square test.

c Descriptive level of probability of Fisher’s exact test.

Table 2 shows the comparison of groups regarding surgical variables.

Table 2 Surgical variables according to study group. 

Variable Group N Mean SD Median Min Max p
Anesthesia time Clonidine 15   258.33   35.32    255   210   345 0.173a
Placebo 14   236.79   47.17    240   125   315  
Surgery time Clonidine 15   203.27   22.11    200   170   245 0.609a
Placebo 14   196.86   40.92 197.5     95   270  
Fluid balance Clonidine 15   796.67 221.57    900   150   950 0.752b
Placebo 14   871.43   82.54    850   800 1000  
Blood balance Clonidine 15    -50.00 269.26   -200 -250   550 0.292b
Placebo 14     70.71 295.41        0 -200   480  
Diuresis Clonidine 15 1000.00 602.38  1000 -700 2000 0.510b
  Placebo 14 1122.00 293.68  1150   500 1600  

a Descriptive level of probability of Student’s t-test.

b Descriptive level of probability of the nonparametric Mann---Whitney test.

Table 3 shows the comparison of groups regarding baseline pressure measurement, and it was noted that the groups did not differ significantly with respect to baseline pressure.

Table 3 Baseline pressure according to study group. 

Variable Group N Mean SD Median Min Max p *
MPAP(catheterization) Clonidine 15 48.80 17,94 44 28 100 0.200
Placebo 14 40.50 15,93 35.5 26   77  
MAP (baseline) Clonidine 15 80.07 16.29 79 59 125 0.315
Placebo 14 74.00 15.58 72 52 100  

MPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure.

* Descriptive level of probability of Student's t-test.

Table 4 shows the evolution of variables over the time periods studied. Student's t-test evaluation showed that the groups did not differ significantly at time T0 regarding MAP (p = 0.779).

Table 4 Evolution of MAP according to study group. 

Group Time n Mean SD Min Max
  T0 15 68.93 9.32 52 80
Clonidine T1 15 59.00 7.22 50 79
  T2 15 71.47 7.92 58 80
  T3 15 64.73 7.62 51 80
  T0 14 69.93 9.61 56 81
Placebo T1 14 64.93 8.18 53 77
  T2 14 74.93 7.80 59 92
  T3 14 68.71 6.14 60 79

In the analysis of variance with repeated measures, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to behavior (p = 0.703) and the average at each time point (p = 0.051). There was significant change in MAP at the evaluated times in both groups (p < 0.001). T0 differed significantly from T1 (p = 0.001) and did not differ from T2 (p = 0.085) and T3 (p = 0.168). T1 differed significantly from T2 (p < 0.001) and T3 (p = 0.022). T2 differed significantly from T3 (p = 0.001) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 Evolution of MAP. 

With the use of Student's t-test, we found no significant difference between groups at T0 regarding HR (p = 0.865) (Table 5).

Table 5 Evolution of heart rate according to study group. 

Group Time n Mean SD Min Max
  T0 15 90.07 27.65 61 145
Clonidine T1 15 81.60 25.13 55 143
  T2 15 97.93 15.29 68 122
  T3 15 97.73 18.45 63 128
  T0 14 88.43 23.41 49 130
Placebo T1 14 86.50 19.22 60 125
  T2 14 97.79 16.56 61 121
  T3 14 94.07 16.87 60 123

Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed no significant difference between groups regarding behavior (p = 0.321) and mean for each assessment time (p = 0.979). There was significant change in HR at the assessment times in both groups (p = 0.036). T0 did not differ significantly from T1 (p = 0.059), T2 (p = 0.149), and T3 (p = 0.273). T1 differed significantly from T2 (p = 0.015) and T3 (p = 0.035). T2 did not differ significantly from T3 (p = 0.188) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 Evolution of HR. 

Student's t-test revealed that the groups did not differ significantly at T0 in relation to MPAP (p = 0.068) (Table 6).

Table 6 Evolution of MAP according to study group. 

Group Time n Mean SD Min Max
  T0 15 38.40 13.02 36.00 26.00
Clonidine T1 15 30.93 19.16 24.00 18.00
  T2 15 28.80 11.03 27.00 11.00
  T3 15 25.47   7.98 25.00 11.00
  T0 14 31.36   5.09 31.00 25.00
Placebo T1 14 24.50   7.55 25.00 12.00
  T2 14 27.64   8.16 27.50 19.00
  T3 14 22.86   5.60 22.00 10.00

Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed no significant difference between groups regarding behavior (p = 0.334) and mean for each assessment time (p = 0.223). There was significant change in MPAP times evaluated in both groups (p < 0.001). T0 differed significantly from T1 (p < 0.001), T2 (p < 0.001), and T3 (p < 0.001). T1 did not differ significantly from T2 (p = 0.807) and T3 (p = 0.106). T2 differed significantly from T3 (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 Evolution of PMAP. 

In the following analyses, the study of drugs used is presented.

Table 7 shows the comparison of groups regarding the evolution of sodium nitroprusside.

Table 7 Evolution of sodium nitroprusside according to study group. 

Group Time n Mean SD Min Max Group
  T0 15 0.16 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.64
Clonidine T1 15 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.21
  T2 15 0.90 0.55 0.75 0.00 2.10
  T3 15 0.48 0.62 0.24 0.00 2.10
  T0 14 0.19 0.32 0.00 0.00 1.00
Placebo T1 14 0.25 0.39 0.00 0.00 1.29
  T2 14 1.27 0.84 1.05 0.00 3.40
  T3 14 0.79 0.66 0.63 0.00 2.10

The nonparametric Friedman's test revealed that there was significant change in nitroprusside dosage in the clonidine (p < 0.001) and placebo (p < 0.001) groups. In clonidine and placebo groups, T2 differed significantly from T0 (p < 0.05) and T1 (p < 0.05), with significantly higher value; other comparisons showed no significant difference.

Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test showed that the groups did not differ regarding nitroprusside at T0 (=0.901), T2 (=0.138), and T3 (=0.147). The groups differed at T1 (=0.022), when the clonidine group showed a significantly lower value compared to placebo.

Table 8 shows the comparison of groups regarding dobutamine evolution.

Table 8 Evolution of dobutamine according to study group. 

Group Time n Mean SD Min Max Group
  T0 15 0.33 1.29 0 0   5
Clonidine T1 15 2.00 2.54 0 0   5
  T2 15 5.00 1.89 5 0 10
  T3 15 5.67 1.76 5 5 10
  T0 14 0.00 0.00 0 0   0
Placebo T1 14 0.36 1.34 0 0   5
  T2 14 5.00 0.00 5 5   5
  T3 14 5.00 0.00 5 5   5

Nonparametric Friedman test revealed that there was significant change in dobutamine dosage in clonidine (p < 0.001) and placebo groups (p < 0.001). In clonidine and placebo groups, T0 and T1 differed significantly from T2 (p < 0.05) and T3 (p < 0.05) and had significantly lower values. Other comparisons showed no significant difference.

Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test showed no difference between groups in relation to dobutamine at T0 (p = 0.370), T2 (p = 1.000), and T3 (p = 0.180). There was difference between groups at T1 (p = 0.045), with a significantly higher value for clonidine compared to placebo.

Table 9 shows the comparison of groups regarding total fentanyl, and it was observed that there was no significant difference between groups regarding total dose of fentanyl.

Table 9 Total dose of fentanyl according to study group. 

Group n Mean SD Min Max Mean p*
Clonidine 15 19.33 4.17 20 10 25 0.208
Placebo 14 21.43 4.57 20 15 30  

*Descriptive level of probability of Student’s t-test.

Discussion

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart diseases has the same pathophysiological processes of other forms of the disease. Early in the development of PH, hypoxic vasoconstriction that, a priori, is a reversible physiological mechanism becomes constant and difficult to reverse.12

Unlike what happens in physiological conditions, endogenous vasodilators, such as nitric oxide and prostacyclin, are unable to balance the effects of mediators responsible for vasoconstriction, such as thromboxane A2, endothelin, and serotonin. Vascular remodeling involves the three coats of the pulmonary bed arteries and consists of intimal hyperplasia, medial hypertrophy, and proliferation of adventitious.13

In situ thrombosis results from change in flow pattern, which becomes slower; changes in the endothelium;14 and increased platelet activity by increased activity of thromboxane A2.13

Patients with group II pulmonary venous hypertension exhibit ventricular dysfunction (on the left) secondary to valvular heart disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy (on the right) by pressure overload.2 Hypotension is part of this complex picture. Pulmonary resistance precludes the passage of blood and limits the left ventricle filling. Therefore, stroke volume, cardiac output, and blood pressure are reduced.

PH causes hypoxemia and hypercapnia, which in a vicious circle aggravate pulmonary vasoconstriction. Metabolic acidosis and nociceptive stimulation, common events during anesthesia, may also accentuate the PH.

For the reasons cited above, pharmacological intervention is mandatory in these patients perioperatively.

Clonidine, due to its action on locus coeruleus, promotes sedation and spinal cord analgesia, hence, the anesthesiologists’ interest in using it in the perioperative period. The cardiovascular action of clonidine is well known. Its vasodilator activity is due to peripheral and central mechanisms. Peripherally, the activation of α2-adrenergic receptors on presynaptic nerve terminals inhibits noradrenaline exocytosis, which partially explains the hypotensive effect. At central level, it acts on the vasomotor center α2-receptors in the nucleus of the solitary tract, decreases sympathetic outflow, with potentiation of parasympathetic nervous activity, and leads to reduced blood pressure.6,15,16

Despite the presence of α2-adrenergic receptors on nerve endings and other pulmonary structures7-9 and the recognized central vasodilator effect of clonidine, there are no reports in the literature of the use of this drug to attenuate pulmonary hypertension in PH adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Clonidine could be a viable option for pH control, because in addition to the benefits already mentioned, clonidine is known to be safe. Its effects, which may sometimes interfere with cardiac output, such as bradycardia or hypotension, are easily reversed with atropine or vasopressor such as ephedrine. The cost of its use should also be taken into account because it has a low price and is available in most hospitals worldwide.

The possibility of reducing pulmonary arterial pressure with the use of clonidine may still allow a reduction or even elimination of drugs that are routinely used in pH and—even though effective for disease control—are not without relevant undesired side effects.

This is the case of dobutamine, which is used in this research to improve cardiac performance and reduce pulmonary vascular resistance in PH patients. Dobutamine is a synthetic catecholamine, isoproterenol derivative, adopted in our service and widely used worldwide for treating PH patients undergoing heart surgery.9 It can be administered alone or in combination with other drugs. Dobutamine is a β-adrenergic agent with predominant action on β1-receptors, which increases the concentration of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and leads to increased cardiac inotropy and chronotropy, reducing systemic vascular and pulmonary resistance. Dobutamine at a dosage of 5-10 μg/kg/min improves cardiac contractility.

Due to its activity in β2-adrenergic receptors and increased release of endogenous adenosine, it has coronary vasodilator effect (with normofunctioning vascular endothelium).17 However, doses higher than 10 μg/kg/min, as it is often necessary to achieve the vasodilator effect in pulmonary artery and increase RV contractility in PH patients, increase cardiac work and myocardial oxygen consumption. Thus, there is an imbalance between supply and consumption of O2, followed by myocardial ischemia. Its vasodilator effect may exacerbate systemic hypotension found in PH patients.3

Another drug routinely used in cardiovascular surgery and also in this study is sodium nitroprusside.5,18 This drug reduces right ventricle afterload by decreasing pulmonary vascular resistance. Recognized as a potent vasodilator, NTP may, even in recommended therapeutic doses, cause very undesirable side effects. Undesirable effects such as coronary steal, increased intracranial pressure, volume compensatory need, toxicity by its metabolites, metabolic acidosis, and intrapulmonary shunt are particularly found in cardiac patients undergoing heart surgery.

The potential effect of clonidine by lowering pulmonary vasculature pressure could result beneficial for dose reduction or even elimination of these drugs.

Patients in this study underwent heart surgery to treat their underlying diseases causing pulmonary hypertension, such as valvular heart disease and heart failure, with cardiopulmonary bypass under general balanced anesthesia. Regarding diagnostic method to select them, we opted for the right heart catheterization, because it is regarded as the gold standard examination for PH diagnosis.12

All patients were ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air (1:1) to avoid low fraction of inspired oxygen, which could worsen pulmonary hypertension, as we know. Ventilation was set to maintain capnometry between 30 and 35 mmHg in order to prevent hypercarbia, an aggravating factor for pulmonary hypertension. The gradient of about 5 mmHg or less was considered,19 which is recorded by the capnometry device as a result of gas that does not participate in gas exchange (alveolar dead space).

We try to keep the same regime of fluid and blood replacement in both groups during surgery, even during CPB (same volume in milliliters per kilogram of body weight in the perfusate and control of hemoconcentration in the presence of perfusion). Therewith, we had no significant difference regarding water and blood balance or urine output between the two groups in the perioperative period. Differences in blood volume could result in significant changes in systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures and hinder the reliability of the research.

Still on the method used, after the registration of the first variables (T0) and the slow administration of clonidine or placebo, it was decided to wait 30 min to measure the variables of the subsequent time (T1), because this is the approximate time of this drug latency. We opted to perform the last measurements (T3) 10 min after protamine. Because this drug is alkaline, it may release histamine when injected rapidly20,21 and, combined with its ability to activate the complement system when circulating through the pulmonary vasculature (in a complex formed with heparin),22 it could worsen PH and thus alter the measurements of pulmonary arterial pressure.

In the present study, except at T1, the administration of clonidine was not associated with reduced pulmonary artery pressure or decreased need for infusion of drugs used for this purpose. At T1, clonidine group received significantly lower doses of sodium nitroprusside and significantly higher doses of dobutamine. These differences were not repeated at other times and perhaps may be explained by the less intense surgical stimulation in this phase of the intervention. At that time, the surgical team waited for the latency time of clonidine, without manipulating patients, before starting CPB.

Reducing pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertension of any disease classification group is a difficult task. For this purpose, endothelin antagonists (bosentan), prostacyclin analogs (iloprost) or sildenafil has been clinically used. Intraoperatively, phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as milrinone and inhaled nitric oxide are used. These options are not always able to reverse the right ventricle deterioration by exacerbation of PH or improve gas exchange.23

Therefore, the fact that there is no statistically significant difference between the clonidine and placebo groups regarding pulmonary arterial pressure measurements is not surprising, although the ability of this drug to decrease vascular tone is known. However, it is surprising that there was no difference between the two groups regarding systemic blood pressure, heart rate, and fentanyl consumption. After all, among other effects, the ability of this drug to reduce blood pressure and heart rate is well established.

Similarly, the potential of clonidine to reduce the need for anesthesia in cardiac surgery is known.24 Perhaps the positive chronotropic activity of dobutamine has suppressed the bradycardic effect of clonidine and not allowed difference between both groups with respect to heart rate. Furthermore, catecholamine levels are high during CPB and remained so even after aortic declamping25-27 and may overcome the effects of clonidine on heart rate and blood pressure.

Thus, it was necessary to maintain the opioids dosage. Clonidine has a long half-life (approximately 12 h). Thus, although there has been no reduction in intraoperative PH, one cannot rule out that the pulmonary vasodilatory action of clonidine is expressed in the late postoperative period, when the endogenous adrenergic activity is reduced.

The dose of clonidine used in this research may also be questioned. Intravenous dosage prescribed by several authors28-30 and in our everyday practice is 2 μg/kg. However, when Kulka et al. examined the clonidine dose-response in cardiac surgery, with 2, 4 or 6 μg/kg IV28 on sympathetic-adrenal response, they only found effectiveness in blocking catecholamine and hemodynamic responses with 4 or 6 μg/kg.

In fact, higher doses may be associated with more significant vasodilator effect on pulmonary artery and reduce the need for dobutamine and sodium nitroprusside. However, high doses could also cause (in a counterproductive way) hypertension and worsen PH by acting on postsynaptic α2-adrenergic receptors in walls of the pulmonary arteries.31

Due to the desirable effects reported by several authors,32-34 such as diuretic, reduced tremors with decreased myocardial oxygen consumption, and perioperative hemodynamic stability, among others, which were not goals of our research, clonidine will continue to be considered a useful adjuvant for heart surgery.

Conclusions

The analysis of data obtained in this study allows us to conclude that in patients of group 2, with pulmonary hypertension undergoing cardiac surgery, clonidine (2 μg/kg) administered intravenously after sternotomy was not able to reduce the pulmonary arterial pressure or reduce or eliminate the need for intraoperative dobutamine or sodium nitroprusside.

Appendix

A box of 30 ampoules with equal external labels, 15 with 150 µg clonidine in 1 mL solution and 15 with 1 mL distilled water, without the active ingredient (placebo), was sent by the Cristália laboratory.

Ampoules and patients were randomized by the laboratory. A list to be followed in numerical order was sent with the box. A sealed envelope containing the clonidine and placebo ampoules could only be opened at the end of the investigation.

During the study, both patients and the investigator were blind to the treatment used; therefore, it was a controlled, comparative, randomized and double-blind study.

REFERENCES

1. Simonneau G, Galiè N, Rubin LJ, et al. - Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:5-12. [ Links ]

2. Voelkel NF, Quaife RA, Leinwand LA, et al. - Right ventricular function and failure: report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on cellular and molecular mechanisms of right heart failure. Circulation. 2006;24:1883-91. [ Links ]

3. Rubenfire M, Bayram M, Hector-Word Z. - Pulmonary hypertension in the critical care setting: classification, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:801-34. [ Links ]

4. Levy JH. - Management of systemic and pulmonary hypertension. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32:467-71. [ Links ]

5. Simonetti MPB, Valinetti EA, Ferreira FMC. - Clonidine: from nasal descongestive to potent analgesic. Historical and pharmacological considerations. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1997;47:37-47. [ Links ]

6. Alves TCA, Braz JRC, Vianna PTG. - α2 agonistas em anestesiologia: aspectos clínicos e farmacológicos. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2000;50:396-404. [ Links ]

7. Starke K, Gothert M, Kilbinger H. - Modulation of neurotransmitter release by presynaptic autoreceptors. Physiol Rev. 1989;69:864-989. [ Links ]

8. Barnes PJ, Liu SF. - Regulation of pulmonary vascular tone. Pharmacol Rev. 1995;47:87-131. [ Links ]

9. Blaise G, Langleben D, Hubert B. - Pulmonary arterial hypertension: pathophysiology and anesthetic approach. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1415-32. [ Links ]

10. Rosner B. - Fundamentals of biostatistics. 2ª ed. Boston: PWS Publishers; 1986. p. 584. [ Links ]

11. Timm NH. -Multivariate analysis with applications in educations and psychology. Monterrey: Brooks/Cole. 1975:p687. [ Links ]

12. Schannwell CM, Steiner S, Strauer BE. - Diagnostics in pulmonary hypertension. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;58:591-602. [ Links ]

13. McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, et al. - ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation task force on expert consensus documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians. AmericanThoracic Society, Inc., and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Circulation. 2009;119:2250-94. [ Links ]

14. Diagnóstico, avaliaçcão e terapêutica da hipertensão pulmonar - Características estruturais, desenvolvimento normal e remodelamento patológico da circulacão pulmonar. Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. 2005:1-20. Disponível em: http://publicacoes.cardiol.br/consenso/2005/039.asp. [ Links ]

15. Kubo T, Misu Y.- Pharmacological characterisation of the alpha adrenoceptors responsible for a decrease of blood pressure in the nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology. 1981;317:120-5. [ Links ]

16. Ruffolo Jr RR. - Distribution and function of peripheral alpha-adrenoceptors in the cardiovascular system. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1985;22:827-33. [ Links ]

17. Bogaz FA, Saroute AN, Tsutsui JM, et al. - Coronary spasm induced by dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006;87:250-3. [ Links ]

18. Fattouch K, Sbraga F, Bianco G, et al. - Inhaled prostacyclin, nitric oxide, and nitroprusside in pulmonary hypertension after mitral valve replacement. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2005;20:171-6. [ Links ]

19. Amaral JLG, Ferreira ACP, Ferez D, et al. - Monitorizacão da respiraçcão: oximetria e capnografia. Rev Bras Anest. 1992;42:51-8. [ Links ]

20. Levy JH, Faraj BA, Zaidan JR, et al. - Effects of protamineon histamine release from human lung. Agents Actions. 1989;28:70-2. [ Links ]

21. Sauder RA, Hirshman CA. - Protamine-induced histamine release in human skin mast cells. Anesthesiology. 1990;73:165-7. [ Links ]

22. Rent R, Ertel N, Eisenstein R, et al. - Complement activation by interaction of polyanions and polycations. I. Heparinprotamine induced consumption of complement. J Immunol. 1975;114:120-4. [ Links ]

23. Pritts CD, Pearl RG. - Anesthesia for patients with pulmonary hypertension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:411-6. [ Links ]

24. Flacke JW, Bloor BC, Flacke WE, et al. - Reduced narcotic requirements by clonidine with improved hemodynamic and adrenergic stability in patient undergoing coronary surgery. Anesthesiology. 1987;67:11-9. [ Links ]

25. Hirvonen J, Huttunen P, Nuutinen L, et al. - Catecholamines and free fatty acids in plasma of patients undergoing cardiac operations with hypothermia and bypass. J Clin Pathol. 1978;31:949-55. [ Links ]

26. Wallach R, Karp RB, Reves JG, et al. - Pathogenesis of paroxysmal hypertension developing during and after coronary bypass surgery: a study of hemodynamic and humoral factors. Am J Cardiol. 1980;46:559-65. [ Links ]

27. Souza MHL, Elias DO. - Fundamentos da circulacão extracorpórea. V. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Editorial Alfa Rio. 1995:373-91. [ Links ]

28. Kulka PJ, Tryba M, Zenz M. - Dose-response effects of intravenous clonidine on stress response during induction of anesthesia in coronary artery bypass graft patients. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:263-8. [ Links ]

29. Stocche RM, Garcia LV, Klamt JG, et al. - Comparison between sublingual nifedipine and intravenous clonidine to control perio-perative arterial hypertension in cataract procedures. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002;52:426-33. [ Links ]

30. Simoni RF, Cangiani LM, Pereira AM, et al. - Efficacy of intraoperative methadone and clonidine in pain control in the immediate postoperative period after the use of remifentanil. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009;59:421-30. [ Links ]

31. Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, et al. - The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:382-94. [ Links ]

32. Mizobe T, Maze M. - Alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists and anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1995;33:81-102. [ Links ]

33. Delaunay L, Bonnet F, Duvaldestin P. - Clonidine decreases postoperative oxygen consumption in patients recovering from general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67:397-401. [ Links ]

34. Kamibayashi T, Maze M. - Clinical uses of alpha2 -adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1345-9. [ Links ]

Received: October 21, 2012; Accepted: March 20, 2013

Corresponding author. E-mail: beneditobj@uol.com.br (B.B. João).

Conflicts of interest

The author declare no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.