Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Inhalational anesthesia maintenance with the Janus facial mask for transcatheter aortic-valve replacement: a case series

Abstract

Background and objectives

Aortic stenosis is the most common type of heart valve disease. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement has become the alternative for patients considered at high risk for surgery. Controlled mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation has been the choice for this type of procedure, however the use of noninvasive ventilation in cardiac patients has shown to be beneficial. Janus is a novel full-face mask that allows application of noninvasive ventilation support during anesthesia. Our main objective was to evaluate the feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with prolonged transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring under deep inhalational sedation delivered through a new mask for noninvasive ventilation.

Methods

A case series observational study that included five patients with critical aortic stenosis that underwent inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a hybrid room of a teaching hospital. Standard monitors and bispectral index were used, followed by inhalational induction and placement of the Janus mask. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. Patients were transferred to intensive care unit after the procedure. Complications related to the mask use, transesofageal echocardiography accessibility and respiratory implications to the patients were recorded.

Results

All procedures were uneventful and no major complications were observed intraoperatively. One patient presented CO2 retention (50 mmHg) and sevoflurane leak around the central opening of the mask, both without clinical significance.

Conclusions

The use of inhalational anesthesia with the facial mask Janus is a safe and efficient alternative to general anesthesia with tracheal intubation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and can easily accommodate the use of transesophageal echocardiography intraoperatively.

KEYWORDS
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Aortic stenosis; Transesophageal echocardiogram; Noninvasive ventilation; Tracheal intubation; Volatile anesthetics

Resumo

Justificativa e objetivos

A estenose aórtica é o tipo mais comum de doença valvular cardíaca. A substituição percutânea de válvula aórtica tornou-se a alternativa para pacientes cirúrgicos considerados de alto risco. A ventilação mecânica controlada com intubação traqueal tem sido a escolha para esse tipo de procedimento; porém, o uso de ventilação não invasiva em pacientes cardíacos mostrou ser benéfico. Janus é uma nova máscara facial que permite a aplicação de suporte à VNI durante a anestesia. Nosso objetivo primário foi avaliar a viabilidade da substituição transcateter de valva aórtica com monitoração ecocardiográfica transesofágica prolongada sob sedação inalatória profunda através de uma nova máscara para ventilação não invasiva.

Métodos

Estudo observacional de série de casos que incluiu cinco pacientes com estenose aórtica em fase crítica, submetidos à anestesia inalatória com sevoflurano para substituição transcateter de valva aórtica em uma sala híbrida de um hospital universitário. Monitores padrão e índice bispectral foram usados, seguidos de indução inalatória e colocação da máscara Janus. A anestesia foi mantida com sevoflurano. Os pacientes foram transferidos para a unidade de terapia intensiva após o procedimento. As complicações relacionadas ao uso da máscara, a acessibilidade da ecocardiografia transesofágica e as implicações respiratórias para os pacientes foram registradas.

Resultados

Todos os procedimentos transcorreram sem incidentes e não foram observadas complicações maiores no intraoperatório. Um paciente apresentou retenção de CO2 (50 mmHg) e vazamento de sevoflurano em torno da abertura central da máscara, ambos sem significância clínica.

Conclusões

O uso de anestesia inalatória com a máscara facial Janus é uma opção segura e eficiente à anestesia geral com intubação traqueal para substituição transcateter de valva aórtica e pode facilmente acomodar o uso de ecocardiografia transesofágica no intraoperatório.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE
Substituição de válvula aórtica transcateter; Estenose aórtica; Ecocardiograma transesofágico; Ventilação não invasiva; Intubação traqueal; Anestésicos voláteis

Introduction

Aortic Stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease, occurring in up to 10% of all adults over 80 years old with a mortality rate of about 50% within 2 years.11 Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet. 2009;373:956-66. The surgical aortic valve replacement still remains the standard approach for patients with low to intermediate surgical risk. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is the alternative for high-risk patients.22 Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2438-88.,33 Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1696-1704.

Currently, TAVR is mainly performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. This technique is justified by the uncertainty linked to a new procedure, to the operator's learning curve, the possible complications and hemodynamic challenges, the necessity of a temporary cardiac immobility during the procedure, and the necessity for intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiographic (TEE) imaging.44 Ruggeri L, Gerli C, Franco A, et al. Anesthetic management for percutaneous aortic valve implantation: an overview of worldwide experiences. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2012;4:40-6.

Postoperative pulmonary complications in the elderly population are common after general anesthesia and they are associated with a prolonged hospital stay and an increased mortality rate.55 Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, Smetana GW. Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:596-608. Furthermore, avoiding general anesthesia in TAVR has been proved to reduce the overall procedure time and costs and to facilitate patients’ mobilization and thus discharge.66 Motloch LJ, Rottlaender D, Reda S, et al. Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101:45-53. Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) has been evaluated in post-cardiac-surgery patients to prevent or treat postoperative acute respiratory failure. It has been increasingly used both in and outside the ICU setting, because it seems to be beneficial for respiratory and cardiovascular function, mainly in the elderly.77 Landoni G, Zangrillo A, Cabrini L. Noninvasive ventilation after cardiac and thoracic surgery in adult patients: a review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:917-22. The Janus mask (Biomedical, Florence, Italy) is a full face mask that provides NIV and is also used for oxygen supplementation during sedation without tracheal intubation with an airtight port that allows TEE examination.

Our main objective in this case series was to evaluate the feasibility of deep inhalational sedation delivered through Janus mask for TAVR with prolonged transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring.

Methods

After approval by the local research ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained, 5 patients scheduled for TAVR underwent deep sedation with sevoflurane remaining in spontaneous ventilation. All patients received 1.5 mg of midazolam intravenously after placement of venous access in the operating room. Monitoring included electrocardiography, noninvasive arterial blood pressure measurement, pulse oximetry, capnography, and the Bispectral Index (BIS).

All patients underwent inhalational induction with the use of a standard facial mask with a dialed concentration of 2% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen and fresh gas flow of 6 L.min−1 for 30 s. The delivered concentration of sevoflurane was then increased to 7% until loss of consciousness, and then reduced to 2% after BIS values dropped below 65. A Guedel cannula was then inserted to keep the airway free with patients always maintained in spontaneous ventilation.

The standard facial mask was then removed and a Janus mask placed. The TEE probe was inserted thereafter through the mask central port (Fig. 1). Deep sedation with spontaneous ventilation was maintained with sevoflurane 0.5% to 2% end-tidal to maintain the BIS values between 40 and 60.

Figure 1
Side view of the insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe.

TAVR was performed in the hybrid operating room at Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, San Paolo, Brazil and high-resolution fluoroscopy, contrast aortography and continuous TEE were used as imaging methods to guide the implantation of the new prosthesis.

After the procedure, all patients were admitted in the ICU. If necessary, noninvasive ventilation was indicated until complete recovery from anesthesia, with the same mask used during the surgical procedure.

Complications related to the mask use, transesofageal echocardiography accessibility and respiratory perioperative implications to the patients were evaluated.

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, or as number and percentage as appropriate.

Results

In this case series, 5 patients undergoing TAVR were maintained with inhalational deep sedation instead of general anesthesia with tracheal intubation or intravenous sedation.

The patients remained in spontaneous breathing all time and were supported with the new Janus mask, which also allowed performing continuous TEE during the procedure. The administration of sevoflurane through this mask was feasible, effective and with no complication.

Patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1
Demographic data.

All procedures were completed uneventfully, and no major complications were observed intraoperatively or in the ICU unit.

Janus mask was well tolerated by all patients and all TEE examinations were performed successfully. Urgent access to the patient's airway or respiratory management was never required.

One patient had hypercapnia (maximum 50 mmHg) during the procedure but CO2 levels were well tolerated with no need for further intervention or clinical repercussions. There were no unplanned conversions to general anesthesia or any need for airway management.

Sevoflurane leakage trough the central opening of the mask during the TEE's probe manipulation was noted.

All patients recovered in the ICU unit with noninvasive ventilation for at least one hour with no respiratory complications.

Discussion

In this report we presented a case series of 5 patients undergoing TAVR under deep sedation with sevoflurane using prolonged intraoperative TEE through the opening of the full face Janus mask.

General anesthesia with tracheal intubation is associated with significant potential complications, particularly respiratory complications, and high-risk cardiac patients poorly tolerate it. Such patients benefit from minimally invasive anesthetic techniques.88 Guarracino F, Cabrini L, Baldassarri R, et al. Non-invasive ventilation-aided transoesophageal echocardiography in high-risk patients: a pilot study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:554-6. Volatile anesthetics agents have been suggested to contribute to myocardial protection through a preconditioning effect on the myocardium and reducing mortality when used in cardiac procedures.99 Jakobsen CJ, Berg H, Hindsholm KB, et al. The influence of propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia on outcome in 10,535 cardiac surgical procedures. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:664-71.1111 Landoni G, Greco T, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Anaesthetic drugs and survival: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials in cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:886-96. Sevoflurane is one of the most widely used halogen fluoride volatile anesthetics and it has advantages such as, rapid induction, less airway irritation, quicker recovery and no significant side effects. In this case series the use of sevoflurane was well tolerated with no significant adverse events during induction, maintenance or awakening.1212 Xu R, Lu R, Jiang H, et al. Meta-analysis of protective effect of sevoflurane on myocardium during cardiac surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18:1058-66.,1313 Nigro Neto C, Costa E, Rossi R, et al. Inhalation induction with sevoflurane in adult cardiac surgery patients. A case series. Heart Lung Vessel. 2014;6:8-12.

Several studies reported the use of intraoperative NIV in patients that are considered high risk for respiratory complications during mechanical ventilation and general anesthesia.1414 Leech CJ, Baba R, Dhar M. Spinal anaesthesia and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for hip surgery in an obese patient with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:763-5.1717 Guarracino F, Gemignani R, Pratesi G, et al. Awake palliative thoracic surgery in a high-risk patient: one-lung, non-invasive ventilation combined with epidural blockade. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:761-3. NIV restores lung volumes by treating atelectasis, increases alveolar ventilation and reduces the work of breathing. NIV can also offer beneficial effects on the cardiovascular function, lowering left ventricle afterload and improving cardiac output.1818 Cabrini L, Plumari VP, Nobile L, et al. Non-invasive ventilation in cardiac surgery: a concise review. Heart Lung Vessel. 2013;5:137-41. In our study, all patients observed in the ICU unit with NIV with the same mask used intraoperatively, recovered with no respiratory complications.

One problem observed with the use of the Janus mask in these procedures was the gas leakage around the central opening that allows for the TEE's probe insertion and manipulation. This can be a source of room pollution and risk of occupational hazard for the operating room staff due to exposure to volatile agents. The mask allows delivering only 4–5 cm of PEEP (because of leakage around the inserted probe) and should be used as CPAP in spontaneous breathing patients (and not as a full mechanical ventilation).1919 Cabrini L, Savia I, Bevilacqua M, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure during upper endoscopies: a bench-study on a novel device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:e43-e45. However, in spite of these limitations, it was efficient in keeping all patients unconscious and in spontaneous ventilation during the entire procedure.

Transesophageal echocardiography examination is associated with temporary arterial oxygen tension worsening during and after uncomplicated echo examination, and patients with severe cardiac disease are at risk of developing respiratory failure or serious cardiac arrhythmias under these circumstances. The patient's tolerance to the TEE probe is also a concern in awake patients. Our patients were unconscious and the use of the TEE probe with the Janus mask showed to be easy to combine with no trouble for insertion thought the mask, or for manipulation during the exam. We did not observe any interference with the patient's airway, nor arrhythmias while using the TEE with the Janus mask. Furthermore, the Janus mask may also be placed when the TEE is already ongoing and the probe inserted, to support the patient's ventilation.

In the EuroSTAR registry patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair under local or regional anesthesia had significantly lower indices of mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU.1818 Cabrini L, Plumari VP, Nobile L, et al. Non-invasive ventilation in cardiac surgery: a concise review. Heart Lung Vessel. 2013;5:137-41. The use of sedation versus general anesthesia with tracheal intubation has been discussed before and the conclusion was that the decision to perform TAVR under sedation or general anesthesia may ultimately be dictated by the experience of the Heart Team and local hospital policy since that are no data available from randomized trials comparing the technics.2020 Ruppert V, Leurs LJ, Rieger J, et al. Risk-adapted outcome after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: analysis of anesthesia types based on EUROSTAR data. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:12-22.

TAVR procedures are occurring with increasing frequency. Some authors believe that in the near future a shift will be seen from surgical valve replacement to transcatheter valve replacement when intervention for AS is required.2121 Mayr NP, Michel J, Bleiziffer S, et al. Sedation or general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:1518-26. Anesthesiologists are ready to offer all the available monitoring while maintaining patients’ comfort.

Conclusion

The benefits of sedation should be weighed against the risk of an uncontrolled airway and hemodynamic compromise or procedural complications when choosing between that technique and general anesthesia with tracheal intubation for TAVR. Inhalational anesthesia maintenance with the Janus mask seems to have efficient profile that has the potential to avoid the complications of general anesthesia with tracheal intubation while allowing continuous and comfortable TEE examination. Preventing respiratory complications and improving cardiovascular function during and after the procedure might be another benefit from this alternative technique. Randomized controlled clinical trials data in the future might shed a light whether sedation or general anesthesia is the best anesthetic approach to TAVR procedures.

  • Funding
    This study was supported entirely by departmental funds. Janus mask (Biomedical, Florence, Italy) was provided free of charge by the distributor.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to all surgeons and hemodinamicists who helped and provide any contribution to the study. We are also indebted to all fellow cardiovascular anesthesiologists who helped for the care provided to these patients during the study.

References

  • 1
    Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet. 2009;373:956-66.
  • 2
    Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2438-88.
  • 3
    Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1696-1704.
  • 4
    Ruggeri L, Gerli C, Franco A, et al. Anesthetic management for percutaneous aortic valve implantation: an overview of worldwide experiences. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2012;4:40-6.
  • 5
    Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, Smetana GW. Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:596-608.
  • 6
    Motloch LJ, Rottlaender D, Reda S, et al. Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101:45-53.
  • 7
    Landoni G, Zangrillo A, Cabrini L. Noninvasive ventilation after cardiac and thoracic surgery in adult patients: a review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:917-22.
  • 8
    Guarracino F, Cabrini L, Baldassarri R, et al. Non-invasive ventilation-aided transoesophageal echocardiography in high-risk patients: a pilot study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:554-6.
  • 9
    Jakobsen CJ, Berg H, Hindsholm KB, et al. The influence of propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia on outcome in 10,535 cardiac surgical procedures. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:664-71.
  • 10
    Landoni G, Rodseth RN, Santini F, et al. Randomized evidence for reduction of perioperative mortality. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:764-72.
  • 11
    Landoni G, Greco T, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Anaesthetic drugs and survival: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials in cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:886-96.
  • 12
    Xu R, Lu R, Jiang H, et al. Meta-analysis of protective effect of sevoflurane on myocardium during cardiac surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18:1058-66.
  • 13
    Nigro Neto C, Costa E, Rossi R, et al. Inhalation induction with sevoflurane in adult cardiac surgery patients. A case series. Heart Lung Vessel. 2014;6:8-12.
  • 14
    Leech CJ, Baba R, Dhar M. Spinal anaesthesia and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for hip surgery in an obese patient with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:763-5.
  • 15
    Michelet P, D’Journo XB, Seinaye F, et al. Non-invasive ventilation for treatment of postoperative respiratory failure after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2009;96:54-60.
  • 16
    Warren J, Sharma SK. Ventilatory support using bilevel positive airway pressure during neuraxial blockade in a patient with severe respiratory compromise. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:910-1.
  • 17
    Guarracino F, Gemignani R, Pratesi G, et al. Awake palliative thoracic surgery in a high-risk patient: one-lung, non-invasive ventilation combined with epidural blockade. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:761-3.
  • 18
    Cabrini L, Plumari VP, Nobile L, et al. Non-invasive ventilation in cardiac surgery: a concise review. Heart Lung Vessel. 2013;5:137-41.
  • 19
    Cabrini L, Savia I, Bevilacqua M, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure during upper endoscopies: a bench-study on a novel device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:e43-e45.
  • 20
    Ruppert V, Leurs LJ, Rieger J, et al. Risk-adapted outcome after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: analysis of anesthesia types based on EUROSTAR data. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:12-22.
  • 21
    Mayr NP, Michel J, Bleiziffer S, et al. Sedation or general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:1518-26.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Sep-Oct 2018

History

  • Received
    25 Mar 2017
  • Accepted
    20 Jan 2018
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia R. Professor Alfredo Gomes, 36, 22251-080 Botafogo RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 2537-8100, Fax: +55 21 2537-8188 - Campinas - SP - Brazil
E-mail: bjan@sbahq.org