SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.71 suppl.2El envejecimiento poblacional y el compromiso de la enfermeríaEvaluación del riesgo de ulceración en los individuos diabéticos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados




Links relacionados


Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

versión impresa ISSN 0034-7167versión On-line ISSN 1984-0446

Rev. Bras. Enferm. vol.71  supl.2 Brasília  2018 


Aging and quality of life of elderly people in rural areas

Envejecimiento y calidad de vida de los ancianos residentes de la zona rural

Juliana Ladeira GarbaccioI 

Luís Antônio Batista TonacoII 

Wilson Goulart EstêvãoI 

Bárbara Jacome BarcelosI 

IPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

IIUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.



To evaluate the quality of life and health of elderly in rural areas of Minas Gerais State’s center-west.


Cross-sectional study, in four municipalities of Minas Gerais State, by interviewing elderly people. Associations between socio-demographic and quality of life variables were tested, separated into “satisfactory”/“unsatisfactory” with values from the median of positive answers. It was used the chi-square test, Fisher’s test and regression.


182 elderly answered the questions and showed a relation with the “satisfactory” quality of life - bivariate (p < 0.05): age by 69 years (61.6%), married (61.7%), living by 54 years in rural areas (68%), with no financial support (59.5%), living with someone else (61%), non-smoker (60%), presenting good health (76.7%), satisfied with life (69.6%); regression: not having financial support, living with someone else and not smoking.


Elderly people in rural areas present good quality of life/health in the cognitive aspect, access to services, goods, habits, but awareness must be constant due to their weakness.

Descriptors: Elderly; Quality of Life; Integral Attention to Health; Rural Areas; Rural Population



Evaluar la calidad de vida y la salud de los ancianos residentes en las zonas rurales del centro oeste de Minas Gerais.


Estudio transversal, en cuatro municipios mineros, por entrevista con ancianos. Se probaron asociaciones entre variables sociodemográficas y calidad de vida, dicotomizada en “satisfactoria”/”no satisfactoria” con valor obtenido a partir de la mediana de respuestas positivas en las cuestiones. Se utilizó la prueba Chi-cuadrado, Fisher y regresión.


Respondieron a 182 ancianos y presentaron relación con calidad de vida “satisfactoria” - bivariada (p < 0,05): edad hasta 69 años (61,6%), casados (61,7%), residiendo por hasta 54 años en el medio rural (68%), sin recibir ayuda financiera (59,5%), viviendo acompañado (61%), no fumador (60%), refiriendo buena salud (76,7%), satisfecho con la vida (69,6%); regresión: no recibir ayuda financiera, vivir acompañando y no fumar.


Los ancianos de la zona rural presentaron buena calidad de vida/salud en los aspectos cognitivos, acceso a servicios, bienes, hábitos, pero la atención debe ser continua teniendo en cuenta sus vulnerabilidades.

Descriptores: Ancianos; Calidad de vida; Asistencia Integral a la Salud; Zona rural; Población Rural


The process of demographic transition presents with changes in the structure of the population due to the increase in the number of elderly people. It is estimated that, in 2050, Brazil will have the sixth population of older people in the world; and, in the country, the elderly will correspond to 16%(1-2). Aging is considered as a process that undergoes intrinsic and extrinsic influences represented by individual aspects, like: life trajectory, collective life, access to education, health and general care(3). Old age is known as heterogeneous. There are people who grow older with good quality of life and health, with few pathologies, satisfactory self-care, good levels of stress control and life satisfaction. In contrast, there are others that experience inactivity, fatigue, sarcopenia, anorexia, comorbidities and depressive symptoms, which affect the quality of life in old age.

For the World Health Organization (WHO), quality of life is “the individual’s perception of their insertion in life, in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns”. The WHO defines health not only as the absence of disease, but as the condition of perfect physical, mental and social well-being of the individual(4).

The type of life adopted by the old individual directly affects his/her aging process, as well as the socioeconomic and biological risks throughout life are determinant in the process of aging. However, certain external factors influencing access to health services, health and quality of life have a different impact on people in rural areas and urban areas. Among them, access to transportation, geographical distances for the acquisition of goods and services (commerce, health services, schools) and the time required for commuting(5).

However, old age in the Brazilian rural context is a subject insufficiently studied, a priori removed from the eyes of researchers and society for being considered a particular reality, of little importance, given that the rural elderly population in Brazil was estimated at 15.7 % against 84.3% of the urban area(6-7). As a result of the lack of visibility, the scenario of the elderly life in the countryside permeates by common sense, social imaginary, distorted view of reality and prevalence of stigmatized conceptions. In relation to health and health care assistance for elderly rural residents, it is estimated that it is difficult for characteristics related to access (insufficient transportation, poor road conditions or absences, location far from health services), income and the very habit of the elderly in seeking curative/therapeutic rather than preventive care. As a consequence, there may be worsening of the health conditions and quality of life of these elderly people(5,8-9). Thus, we ask ourselves: What is the life of the elderly living in the countryside? What are the characteristics in the scenario that imply satisfactory or unsatisfactory quality of life and health?

This study was justified by the intention of assessing whether the elderly population residing in the rural area of the center-west of Minas Gerais State has fundamental and inherent rights to the human person, without affecting the integral protection; in addition, rights protected by the State, society and family, assured of participation in the community, with dignity and well-being, principles that are directly connected with the factors presented in this research on the quality of life and health of the elderly in rural areas(10). Knowing them will bring subsidies to better assist them. It is inferred from other studies on the subject that the elderly living in rural areas live with variable situations between poverty and absence, with geographic isolation, low levels of schooling, poor housing conditions, greater difficulties of access to health services, social resources, and transportation, when compared to the elderly living in urban areas(11).


To evaluate the quality of life and health of the elderly living in rural areas.


Ethical aspects

The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Data collection began with presentation of the study and signing of the Free and Clarified Consent Term (FCCT); in the case of the illiterate, consent was made by a relative.

Study design, place and period

This was a cross-sectional survey carried out in the municipalities of Arcos, Piumhi, Pimenta and Japaraíba, located in the center-west of Minas Gerais State, from February to December 2014.

Population and sample: inclusion and exclusion criteria

The general population and the elderly respectively were: Arcos 36,597/4,286, Piumhi 31,883/4,292, Pimenta 8,236/975 and Japaraíba 3,939/365(12-13). Center-west of Minas Gerais State had 1.12 million inhabitants (5.7% of the total state), 11.3% lived in the rural area, with income generation concentrated in the services sector (60.4%), with emphasis on the industrial sector (25.1%) and agriculture (14.5%)(14). The municipalities listed in the survey have socioeconomic impacts in the region. The participants in this study were elderly with a minimum age of 60 years, cognitively able to answer the questions, being approached in their rural residences or in the Basic Health Units (during visits to the city). In the municipalities, an investigation was carried out with the health agencies and the registers of the Basic Health Units to obtain the location of the rural residences inhabited by the elderly. In the registries, 345 elderly individuals were found, and the calculation - considering p = 0.05 and 95% confidence interval - resulted in a sample of 182. They were randomly chosen from the aforementioned records.

Study protocol

For the interviews, a questionnaire was used, containing 10 parts and 113 questions, based on the SABE project (health, well-being and aging) instrument and a study conducted in Rio Grande do Sul State(15-16). The interviews took place from Monday to Friday from 9:00 am to 6:00 pm, preferably in a silent and uninterrupted environment. The questions were addressed to the respondent orally, in person, and an interview notebook was provided to follow the interviewer’s reading of the questions (three, properly trained), and the answers were marked only in the interviewer’s questionnaire.

Analysis of results and statistics

The results were analyzed descriptively and statistically using the program Statistical Package for the Social Sciences/13.0. The associations between the socio-demographic variables and the quality of life were tested, being separated into “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory” with value from the median of answers in the questions by the participants. The chi-square test, Fisher’s test was used to validate the association (p <0.05) in the bivariate analysis. The variables that presented p-value less than 0.2 went to the adjustment stage of the final model in multivariate analysis.

Quality of life was separated into “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory” with value from the median of positive answers/correct answers to the questions considered in the questions. Thirty questions were chosen to define quality of life, as follows: Results of Mini Mental State Examination; access to piped water; Sewer; toilets; electricity; waste disposal/collection; access to the media; transportation; live with someone else; feel good in the residence; health evaluation; health assessment; health evaluation; use of medications; practice of physical activities; habit of smoking; full daily meals; listen to problems; view; speaks; chew; difficulty in swallowing; frequency of choking; amount of teeth in the oral cavity; falls in the last year; use of assistive technology for commuting; access to health services; waiting time to schedule appointments; presence of caregiver in sickness; receive care when sick.


200 elderly people living in rural areas were invited to participate: 14 refused and 182 answered the questions. These, with average age of 69 years (60-95 years); 92 (50.5%) were female; 128 (70.3%) reported being married and 160 (87.9%) retired. As to the profession, 94 (51.6%) of the elderly mentioned agriculture as a profession, being ploughmen or ranchers; 47 (25.8%) were home-based workers; and 100 (54.9%) stated that they did not perform any work at that time. As for education level of the elderly has predominated incomplete Basic Education (100/54.9%), with ability of reading, writing (135/74.2%). About the dwelling, 175 (96.2%) claimed to own their own home, of which 176 (96.7%) had masonry residences and 180 (98.9%) had piped water inside the home. Other socio-demographic data are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Profile of the elderly (N = 182) of the rural area and housing, Municipalities of Arcos, Japaraíba, Piumhi and Pimenta, center-west of Minas Gerais State, Brazil, 2014 

Variables Categories n (182) %
Age (average in years) ≤ 69 112 61.5
> 69 70 38.5
Age (by bracket) 60-69 112 61.5
70-79 56 30.7
80-89 14 7.7
Gender Female 92 50.5
Male 90 49.5
Skin Color White 127 69.8
Black 33 18.1
Brown 21 11.5
Yellow 1 0.5
Marital Status Married 128 70.3
Widow(er) 35 19.2
Single 13 7.1
Divorced/separated 6 3.3
Living in rural areas (average in years) ≤ 54 78 42.9
> 54 104 57.1
Place of birth Rural 103 56.6
Urban 79 43.4
Knowing how to read/write Yes 135 74.2
No 13 7.1
Education Writes their name 34 18.7
Incomplete Basic Education 104 57.1
Complete Basic Education 20 10.9
Complete Secondary Level Education 11 6.0
Illiterate (writes their name) 47 25.8
Being retired Yes 160 87.9
No 22 12.1
Profession Ploughmen/farmer 65 35.7
Home-based/domestic 47 25.8
Rancher 29 15.9
Autonomous/dealer 10 5.4
Seamstress 6 3.3
Equipment Operator 4 2.2
Others 21 11.5
Laboring (interview day) No 100 54.9
Yes 82 45.1
Having financial support No 163 89.5
Yes 19 10.5
Living alone No 159 87.3
Yes 23 12.7
Residence ownership Elderly's 175 96.2
Third party's 7 3.8
Type of residencial construction Masonry 176 96.7
Mixed 5 2.7
Wood 1 0.5

In relation to the means of communication and transportation, most of the elderly mentioned access to them, distributed in: telephone - 164 elderly (90%); car - 137 (75.3%), bus - 103 (56.6%); cycling - 14 (7.7%), use of horses - 4 (2.2%) and walking - 52 (28.6%). They were variables that allowed to indicate more than one category, so n is above 182.

In the evaluation of self-perception of health, 90 (49.5%) defined it as good; and 2 (1.1%), as bad. Regarding the consultation with a health professional, 92 (50.5%) stated that they used the Basic Health Unit; and 68 (37.4%), the private practice (Table 2).

Table 2 Perceptions of the elderly (N = 182) living in the rural area related to their own health, life and other variables related to health care, center-west of Minas Gerais State, Brazil, 2014 

Variables n (182) %
Self-perception of health
Great 32 17.6
Good 90 49.5
Regular 47 25.8
Bad/Very bad 13 7.1
Consultations with health professionals (last year)
Basic Health Unit 92 50.5
Private Practice 68 37.4
Hospital emergency department /SUS* 6 3.3
Hospital emergency department/ private 4 2.2
Drugstore assistance 3 1.6
Did not look for assistance, even if needed 1 0.5
Obtaining care when gets sick
Yes 161 88.4
No 21 11.6
Characteristics: caregiver in the face of disease/sickness (n = 161)
> 60 years 95 52.2
< 60 years 66 36.3
Female 112 61.5
Male 49 26.9
Husband or partner 98 53.8
Son/daughter 43 23.6
Another family member 15 8.2
Friend/neighbor 5 2.7
Satisfaction with life
I totally agree 134 73.6
I agree, in general 23 12.6
I agree a little 16 8.8
I disagree a little 9 4.9
Liking to live the current life
I totally agree 136 74.7
I agree, in general 27 14.8
I agree a little 13 7.1
I disagree a little 4 2.2
I disagree, in general 2 1.1
Memory evaluation
Excellent 31 17.1
Very good 42 23.1
Good 53 29.1
Regular 44 24.2
Very bad 12 6.4
Yes 32 17.6
No 150 82.4
Falls (last year)
None 136 74.7
One 36 19.8
≥ Two 10 5.5


*Unified HealHealth System

In the occurrence of diseases or sicknesses, 112 (61.5%) of the elderly mentioned that the care is carried out by females and 95 (52.2%) said that the caregiver is older than or equal to 60 years. Regarding who the caregiver is, 98 (53.8%) answered that the person is the wife/husband or partner; and 43 (23.6%), who is the child. As for satisfaction with one’s life and enjoy living in the present life, 134 (73.6%) and 136 (74.7%) agreed totally, respectively. The majority reported not being smokers (150/82.4%) and not having any falls (136/74.7%) in the last year. Further data on health are found in Table 2.

The absence of health consultations was justified by 39 (21.4%) of participants, as a consequence of long distance and/or lack of transportation (15/8.2%), lack of time (10/5.5 %), absence of an accompanying person (9/4.9%), poor attendance (3/1.6) and lack of money to pay for the consultation or the displacement (2/1.1%). The variable-response “quality of life” was separated into “unsatisfactory quality of life” and “satisfactory quality of life” from the median results (78.8%), so that the sample was stratified into two size groups approximations and, consequently, for crosses to express such variables in the sample. Table 3 presents the results of the bivariate analysis between the socio-demographic variables and the separated variable-response, especially those with association (p <0.05).

Table 3 Unadjusted analysis of potential associated factors (socio-demographic and health variables) to the Quality of Life of the elderly in rural areas, center-west of Minas Gerais State, Brazil, 2014 

Variables Quality of Life p value*
n (%)
n (%)
Age (average/years) 0.036
≤ 69 43(38.4) 69(61.6)
> 69 38(54.3) 32(45.7)
Marital Status 0.001
Single 7(53.8) 6(46.1)
Married 49(38.3) 79(61.7)
Divorced/Separated 06(100) -
Widow 19(54.3) 16(45.2)
Average (years) living in rural areas 0.003
≤ 54 25(32.0) 53(68.0)
> 54 56(53.8) 48(46.2)
Place of birth 0.001
Urban 24(30.4) 55(69.6)
Rural 57(55.3) 46(44.7)
Knowing how to write/read 0.051
Yes 57(42.2) 78(57.8)
No 10(76.9) 3(23.1)
Writing the name 14(41.2) 20(58.8)
Having financial support 0.001
Yes 15(78.9) 4(21.0)
No 66(40.5) 97(59.5)
Living alone 0.001
Yes 19(82.6) 04(17.4)
No 62(39.0) 97(61.0)
Own health 0.001
Great 13(40.6) 19(59.4)
Good 21(23.3) 69(76.7)
Regular 36(76.6) 11(23.4)
Bad 10(90.9) 01(9.1)
Very bad 01(50.0) 01(50.0)
Receiving health care when sick 0.005
Yes 65(40.6) 95(59.4)
No 16(72.7) 06(27.3)
Satisfaction with life 0.006
I totally agree 55(41.0) 79(59.0)
I agree, in general 07(30.4) 16(69.6)
I agree a little 12(75.0) 04(25.0)
I disagree a little 07(77.8) 02(22.2)
Memory evaluation 0.003
Excellent 15(48.4) 16(51.6)
Very good 13(30.9) 29(69.0)
Good 17(32.1) 36(67.9)
Regular 27(61.4) 17(38.6)
Very bad 09(75.0) 03(25.0)
Smoker 0.008
Yes 21(65.6) 11(34.4)
No 60(40.0) 90(60.0)


*Person's chi-square.

Younger elders (≤ 69 years old/61.6%), who lived less in the rural area (≤ 54 years/68%), were born in the urban area (69.6%) and are married (61.7%) presented satisfactory quality of life. Older people who reported not being able to read/write (76.9%), who received some financial aid (78.9%), with poor memory (75.0%), dissatisfied with life (77.8%), with a very good memory (69.0%), who live alone (82.6%), who defined their own health as poor (90.9%), smokers (65.6%) and did not receive care when get sick (72.7%) had an unsatisfactory quality of life (Table 3).

In the adjusted analysis (table/number), not receiving financial support, living with a partner and not smoking was associated with a satisfactory quality of life, as opposed to the place of birth and birth in the rural area (Table 4).

Table 4 Poisson multivariate regression model, adjusted for factors associated with satisfactory quality of life among elderly (N = 182) residents of the rural area, center-west of Minas Gerais State, Brazil, 2014 

Variables OR (CI95%) p value
Place of birth 0
Urban -
Rural 0.6 (0.5-0.8)
Having financial support 0.043
Yes -
No 2.5(1.0-5.9)
Living alone 0.013
Yes -
No 3.1(1.3-7.8)
Smoking 0.006
Yes -
No 1.8(1.2-2.9)

Note: PR = prevalence ratio


An area is considered to be urban when it is the seat of a municipality or district, and therefore there is only a political-administrative division of a space defined by municipal councils(17). Brazil had a rural population profile; however, with industrialization, the migratory process occurred, and households settled more in the cities. The rural area has ceased to be the focus of attention and has entered a process of exclusion, poverty, little modernization and political abandonment. The population of these areas, then, faced difficulties, which affected well-being, health and altered the socioeconomic profile(7,18).

In relation to the socio-demographic profile, in this study, there was a predominance of elderly women who were married, but with a slight difference between the genders, corroborating other studies, also in rural areas, with 53.8% of female participants(19-20). The higher life expectancy among women is known to be justified by less exposure to risk factors and by adherence to health care, as well as to health services, preventive and therapeutic programs(21-22). In addition, male-rural-urban migration, which occurs in the productive phase of young adults is one of the reasons for this movement, which is rooted in socioeconomic and cultural dynamics, influencing the greater number of elderly women(23). The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), however, pointed out a higher number of men in rural areas with a sex ratio of 107 men for every 100 women, while in urban areas it was 75 men(18). One explanation is that women migrate to urban homes with children, grandchildren, other relatives, and that men continue to engage in fieldwork(7).

Among the elderly, 54.9% have incomplete Basic Education, and 74.2% of the total can read and write. In this sense, the elderly population, especially the rural population, was excluded from formal education; hence, a direct relationship between old age and being illiterate is observed, reaffirming the leaders’ disregard for public education(24). In relation to the profession, a profile of domestic and field-related work (agriculture, livestock) is proposed, under the condition of retirement and own residence, with a higher proportion compared with the literature (retirement/50.6%; own/70.4%)(25). An important characteristic is that in Brazil, the elderly population that receives some benefit from social security or social assistance is one of the most significant in Latin America. According to the Synthesis of Social Indicators and Social Security, an average of 83.6% (between 76.3% and 84.2%) were contemplated with some benefit from social security. From the age of 65 the figure rises to 94.8%(6,17), making Brazil one of the countries with the highest level of social protection for the elderly. However, this condition does not exempt the elderly from work activity(17). In this study, 45.1% of the respondents said they still had work, which confirms another study, since the values of retirement do not meet the demands of the elderly, although they contribute to the financial dependence of others, such as children. It also points to the relation of work as a way of denying old age, of maintaining independence, of maintaining autonomy as a social actor, beyond the mere necessity of sustenance or of having a remuneration(7).

Regarding health care, the elderly participants in this study reported having it mostly through the BHU, a result pointed out by another research, demonstrating primary care as the main doorway of the elderly in the health network(26). Since 1994, the public policies aimed at the elderly have developed with the implementation of the Family Health Program (FHP), which have gained strength since the Elderly Statute (Estatuto do Idoso) was introduced in 2003, later evolving into the National Programme for Health Care of the Elderly (2006). The latter presents two main complementary and non-exclusive axes: coping with the frailties of the SUS, the families and the elderly; and the promotion of active aging following the 2002 WHO proposal. There is a need: to put these care policies into effect with the elderly population, regardless of where they reside; and support for families with the elderly and the training of professionals(27). It is also assumed that differences in infrastructure between the rural and urban areas, as well as the characteristics of the population may affect the health and QoL of the elderly, when their specific characteristics are not met, being necessary to promote investigations that cover the peculiarities of these different spaces(28).

In this research, only 8.2% of the elderly answered that distance and lack of transportation is one of the reasons for not having necessary consultations, unlike another study that pointed out the access and accessibility of the elderly to the BHU, the transportation shortage for commuting, and distance from rural localities to the BHU, as main intervening factors(29). Thus, there is a disparity between access to fundamental rights and basic needs, revealing the great distance between urban and rural Brazil(28).

Most of the elderly determined women, elderly and spouses/partner as the primary caregivers in cases of sickness. It is a characteristic that refers to the attribution made to women, since many times, to a cultural and social role as the great caregiver of the home and the sick. It is observed that people who are also experiencing aging are assuming the care function, evidenced by the fact that the spouse is the main caregiver of the elderly(30).

In this study, only 1.1% of the elderly considered their own health as bad. The majority considered it as good, corroborating other studies(21,25). Self-perception of health is considered to be indicative of the individual’s own biopsychosocial assessment and quality of life, and must be identified by health professionals in order to develop measures to improve the individual’s health status(25-26,29). Most of the elderly showed satisfaction with life and living, thus highlighting personal satisfaction. The variable of self-perception of health and satisfaction with life may suffer negative or positive influences from the socioeconomic level, health/sickness process, arrangement and family life. The family can be considered a great ally in the constitution of a healthy aging(25).

In a study carried out in the rural coffee-growing region of Colombia, 47% of the elderly reported feeling healthy; of the total, 12% reported their health as very poor, a percentage in which the elderly are aged 80 years or more, from which the relation between the approach of the end of life and worse self-perception of health is inferred. Of the elderly living alone in rural communities, 67.0% perceived themselves to be in good health and 27.8% in poor health. The elderly and males were more numerous among those who reported poor health(26). For the elderly, determining quality of life influences the self-perception of health that consists of feeling good, regardless of the diseases and diseases which may be factors that make it impossible to perform some activities and/or fractionate their abilities. Awareness of the subjective judgment of the patient regarding their physical functioning is increased, and health is included in this overall assessment of status from its aspects(31).

Elderly people with very good quality of life and health have the following characteristics: few diseases, good level of self-care, physical and mental functionality preserved, adherence to physical activities, social participation and high level of satisfaction with life. On the other hand, those who experience the opposite evidences: inactivities, cognitive decline, depressive symptoms and comorbidities, which characterize poor quality of life(32). But it is not always what you observe. It is possible to find them satisfied despite possible sicknesses and limitations. In this sense, it is necessary to discuss aspects of the resilience and resignation of these people. Throughout life, it is assumed that resilience tends to increase functioning as the propeller of adaptations in successful old age. The literature on resilience in old age relates the importance of elements of “being” (self-concept, self-esteem, and emotional regulation) and the resources of the environment (social, family and community support) with internal strength, life goals, and self-questions and adversities of life, so that the difficulties of the field can be overcome(33). On the contrary, resignation is characterized by a conformism in which, even if there are bad conditions of life and health, the person points them as good once he accepts them voluntarily and peacefully. Conformity may be, in the elderly scenario, the acceptance of the lack of commitment of government officials and the lack of effective public policies for the elderly in the country(34).

The quality of life in old age is an important concept today in Brazil, insofar as there is a new social sensitivity to old age, considered both as a problem and as a challenge for individuals and for society(35). The elderly participants of this research presented with satisfactory quality of life, with shorter residence time in rural areas, born in the urban area and married. With the process of senescence, there are losses and limitations in the functioning of the body; the state of aging well comes from the ability to select the remaining functions and reserve capacities to compensate for what was lost in the aging process(36). In this study, the elderly who excelled for good quality of life were those who were born in the rural area, who did not need financial help, who lived with other people and did not smoke. As smoking is an accelerator of aging, both directly through the mediation of free radicals and correlated pathological conditions, it becomes a commitment not only to the expectation but also to the quality of life. In addition, a study conducted in Sweden with the elderly over 85 years showed that good quality of life was associated with a good economic situation(37-38).

Unsatisfactory quality of life was shown in those elderly people who stated that they cannot read/write, that they received some financial help, no life satisfaction, living alone, smokers with poor health perception and no help at the moment of sickness. A large proportion of depressed geriatric patients have cognitive declines - it is considered a decline because they differ from cognitive dysfunction and dementia(39). Older people often become more vulnerable to alcohol and tobacco use, and this may gradually lead to a major population problem, as the number of older people in the world is increasing. They are part of a class that presents various health problems; in response to these and as an aggravating factor, use many drugs, which, combined with the harmful substances present in tobacco and alcohol, make them more susceptible to interactions, worsening of the condition, difficulty of recovery and social interaction(40).

Brazil still has a population with a larger workforce than the dependent population, but projections point to such an outlook until the middle of 2020. Thus, the country is in the moment of choices that imply investments focused on senescent and aging, in all the context, as described in one of the principles of the National Programme of the Elderly, which says that the economic, social, regional differences and contradictions between rural and urban Brazil should be observed by public authorities and society(7,27).

Limitations of the study

The limitations of this study were found in the difficulty of including other municipalities, of performing the direct observation of the elderly to prove some data collected and the absence of clinical research with the application of physical and serological tests. It is hoped that other studies may fill this gap in the knowledge about the elderly living in rural areas, especially in the center-west of Minas Gerais State; and that the present study is useful for comparisons with future data.

Contributions to the area of nursing and public health

Evaluation of the quality of life of elderly residents in the rural area allows nursing to use all its practice as a health profession anchored in the precepts of care, education, epidemiology and public health, discussing and defining actions that may contribute to the dignified aging, right determined by the Brazilian constitution.

Understanding the quality of life of the elderly helps the nursing professional to understand the processes of development of religion, culture and the principles/values present in the family and social environment of the elderly.


Elderly people in rural area participating in this study had a satisfactory quality of life, identified by reports indicating satisfaction with life, low access to health care, financial independence, home ownership, not living alone and caregiver support in cases of sickness. As in any population, there is a portion of these elderly people that needs more attention from the health services due to comorbidities, dependencies, and family support deficits. It is inferred that, in the near future, certain conditions and lifestyles proper to rural areas will be altered by the evolution of housing systems, the needs of modern life and technological expansion.

Knowing the factors that influence aging, health and how these present themselves in daily life collaborates directly in the understanding of the quality of life of elderly people in rural areas. This knowledge guides the proposal of public and social actions of various spheres and services that they share to minimize the risks and fragilities of the elderly.


Research funded by PucMinas - Probic/Fapemig 8747/2014.


1 Aires M, Pauskulin LMG. Capacidade funcional de idosos mais velhos: estudo comparativo em três regiões do Rio Grande do Sul. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2010[cited 2017 Feb 12];18(1):A2.1-A2.7. Available from: ]

2 Pinto HP, Celmira L, Carla AP, Patricia MPL, Denise PC, Fernanda S. Capacidade funcional para atividades da vida diária de idosos da Estratégia de Saúde da Família da zona rural. Ciênc Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2016[cited 2017 Feb 12];21(11):3545-55. Available from: ]

3 Rodrigues WKM, Rocha SV, Vasconcelos LRC, Diniz KO. Atividade física e incapacidade funcional em idosos da zona rural de um munícipio do nordeste do Brasil. Rev Bras Promoç Saúde [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Feb 12];28(1):126-32. Available from: ]

4 World Health Organization. WHO. Envelhecimento ativo: uma política de saúde. Gontijo S. (Trad. ). Brasília: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 2005. [ Links ]

5 Tavares DMS, Gomes NC, Dias FA, Santos NMF. Fatores associados à qualidade de vida de idosos com osteoporose residentes na zona rural. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm [Internet]. 2012[cited 2017 Feb 12];16(2):371-8. Available from: ]

6 Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE. Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013. (Série Estudos e Pesquisas: Informação Demográfica e Socioeconômica, n. 32). [ Links ]

7 Alcântara AO, Duarte AGA, Frota, MHP. Velhice e espaço rural: (re)desenhos dos discursos. Rev Kairós Gerontol [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Feb 12];18(2):209-26. Available from: ]

8 Travassos C, Viacava F. Francisco. Acesso e uso dos serviços de saúde em idosos residentes em áreas rurais, Brasil, 1998 e 2003. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2007[cited 2017 Feb 12];23(10):2490-502. Available from: ]

9 Tavares DMS, Fachinelli AMP, Dias FA, Bolina AF, Paiva MP. Preditores da qualidade de vida de idosos urbanos e rurais. Rev Baiana Enferm [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Feb 12];29(4):361-71. Available from: ]

10 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Lei nº 8.080, de 19 de Setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 20 de setembro de 1990. [ Links ]

11 Tavares DMS, Paiva MM, Dias FA, Diniz MA, Martins NPF. Características sociodemográficas e qualidade de vida de idosos com hipertensão arterial sistêmica que residem na zona rural: importância do enfermeiro. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2013[cited 2017 Feb 12];21(2):515-22. Available from: ]

12 Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE . [Internet]. Minas Gerais: Arcos. 2014[cited 2017 Feb 12]. Available from: ]

13 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS . Tecnologia da Informação a Serviço do SUS [Internet]. 2014[cited 2017 Feb 12]. Available from: ]

14 Associação Mineira de Município. Caracterização econômica das regiões de planejamento [Internet].[cited 2017 Feb 12]. Available from: ]

15 Morais EP. Envelhecimento no meio rural: condições de vida, saúde e apoio dos idosos mais velhos de Encruzilhada do Sul - RS. [Tese]. Universidade de São Paulo, Programa de Pós-graduação em Enfermagem Fundamental. 2007. 217 p. [ Links ]

16 Lebrão ML, Duarte YAO. SABE - Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento - O Projeto Sabe no município de São Paulo: uma abordagem inicial. Brasília: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 2003. 255 p. [ Links ]

17 Banco Mundial. Banco Internacional para a Reconstrução e o Desenvolvimento. Envelhecendo em um país mais velho: Implicações do envelhecimento populacional sobre o crescimento econômico, redução da pobreza, finanças públicas e prestação de serviços. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial; 2011. [ Links ]

18 Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE . Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2008. (Série Estudos e Pesquisas: Informação Demográfica e Socioeconômica, n. 23). [ Links ]

19 Tavares VOV, Teixeira KM, Wajanman S, Loreto DSM. Interfaces entre a renda dos idosos aposentados rurais e o contexto familiar. Textos Contextos (Porto Alegre) [Internet]. 2011[cited 2017 Feb 12];10(1):94-108. Available from: ]

20 Tavares DMS, Ribeiro AG, Ferreira PCS, Martins NPF, Pegorari MS. Idosos octogenários nos contextos urbano e rural: comparação socioeconômica, morbidades e qualidade de vida. Rev Enferm UERJ [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Feb 12];23(2):156-63. Available from: ]

21 Pliger C, Menon MH, Mathias TAF. Características sociodemográficas e de saúde de idosos: contribuições para os serviços de saúde. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet] 2011[cited 2017 Feb 12];19(5):1230-8. Available from: ]

22 Silva IT, Pinto Jr EP, Vilela ABA. Autopercepção de saúde de idosos que vivem em estado de corresidência. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol [Internet]. 2014[cited 2017 Feb 12];17(2):275-87. Available from: ]

23 Costa MFL, Barreto SM, Giatti L. Condições de saúde, capacidade funcional, uso de serviços de saúde e gastos com medicamentos da população idosa brasileira: um estudo descritivo baseado na Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2003[cited 2017 Feb 12];19(3):735-43. Available from: ]

24 Santos AS, Silveira RE, Souza MC, Monteiro T, Silvano CM. Perfil de saúde de idosos residentes em um município do interior mineiro. Rev Enferm Atenção Básica [Internet]. 2012[cited 2017 Feb 12];1(1):80-9. Available from: ]

25 Tavares DMS, Gávea Jr SA, Dias FA, Santos FA, Oliveira NMF. Qualidade de vida e capacidade funcional de idosos residentes na zona rural. Rev Rene [Internet]. 2011[cited 2017 Feb 12];12(n. esp. ):895-903. Available from: ]

26 Fernandes MTO. A rede de atenção à saúde para o cuidado à pessoa idosa na atenção primária: um modelo teórico. [Tese] Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Escola de Enfermagem: 2013. [ Links ]

27 Oliveira AD, Ramos OA, Panhoca I, Alves VLS. A intersetorialidade nas políticas públicas para o envelhecimento no Brasil. Rev Kairós Gerontol [Internet]. 2014[cited 2017 Feb 12];17(2):91-103. Available from: ]

28 Santos EA, Tavares DMS, Rodrigues LR, Dias FA, Ferreira PCS. Morbidades e qualidade de vida de idosos com diabetes mellitus residentes nas zonas rural e urbana. Rev Esc Enferm Usp [Internet]. 2013[cited 2017 Feb 12];47(2):393-400. Available from: ]

29 Kuchemann A. Envelhecimento populacional, cuidado e cidadania: velhos dilemas e novos desafios. Rev Soc Estado [Internet]. 2012[cited 2017 Feb 12];27(1):165-80. Available from: ]

30 Pedreira RBS, Andrade CB, Barreto VGA, Pinto Jr EP, Rocha SV. Autopercepção de saúde entre idoso residente em áreas rurais. Rev Kairós Gerontol [Internet]. 2016[cited 2017 Feb 12];19(1):103-19. Available from: ]

31 Cofortin SC, Giehl MWC, Schneider IJC, Orsi E. Autopercepção positiva de saúde em idoso: estudo populacional no sul do Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Feb 12];31(5):1049-60. Available from: 31-5-1049.pdfLinks ]

32 Rosa FHMR, Cupertino APF, Neri AL. Significados de velhice saudável e avaliações subjetivas de saúde e suporte social entre idosos recrutados na comunidade. Geriatr Gerontol [Internet]. 2009[cited 2017 Feb 12];3(2):62-9Available form: ]

33 Fontes AP, Neri AL. Resiliência e velhice: revisão de literatura. Ciênc Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2015[cited 2017 Jun 23];20(5):1475-95. Available from: ]

34 Moraes GVO, Giacomin K, Santos WJ, Firmo JOA. A percepção dos idosos sobre o saber biomédico no cuidado à velhice e às “coisas da idade”. Physis [Internet]. 2016[cited 2017 Jun 23];26(1):309-29. Available from: ]

35 Vagetti GC, Moreira NB, Barbosa Filho VC, Oliveira V, Cancian CF, Mazzardo O, et al. Domínios da qualidade de vida associados à percepção de saúde: um estudo com idosas de um programa de atividade física em bairros de baixa renda de Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil. Ciênc Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2013[cited 2017 Jun 23];18(12):3483-93. Available from: ]

36 Pereira JK, Firmo JOA, Giacomin KC. Maneiras de pensar e de agir de idosos frente às questões relativas à funcionalidade/incapacidade. Ciênc Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2013[cited 2017 Jun 23];19(8):3375-84. Available from: ]

37 Goulart D, Engroff P, Ely LS, Sgnaolin V, Santos EF, Terra NL, et al. Tabagismo em idosos. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol [Internet]. 2010[cited 2017 Jun 23];13(2):313-20. Available from: ]

38 Jakobsson U, Hallberg IR, Westergren A. Overall and health related quality of life among the oldest old in pain. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2004[cited 2017 Jun 23];13(1):125-36. Available from: ]

39 Steibel NM, Almeira RMM. Estudo de caso - avaliação neuropsicológica: depressão x demência. Aletheia [Internet]. 2010[cited 2017 Jun 23]. Available from: ]

40 Senger AEV, Ely LS, Gandolfi T, Schneider RH, Gomes I, Carli GA. Alcoolismo e tabagismo em idosos: relação com ingestão alimentar e aspectos socioeconômicos. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol [Internet]. 2011[cited 2017 Jun 23];14(4):713-9. Available from: ]

Recibido: 07 de Abril de 2017; Aprobado: 22 de Octubre de 2017

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Luís Antônio Batista Tonaco. E-mail:

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.