Pterygium: prevalence and severity in an Amazonian ophthalmic setting, Brazil

Pterígio: prevalência e gravidade em um cenário oftálmico na Amazônia, Brasil

ARTIGO ORIGINAL

Pterygium: prevalence and severity in an Amazonian ophthalmic setting, Brazil

Pterígio: prevalência e gravidade em um cenário oftálmico na Amazônia, Brasil

Sophie Joanna Coutts^I; Andrew Coombes^II

^IBroomfield Hospital, Mid Essex Hospitals NHS Trust, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom

^IISt Bartholomews' & The Royal London University NHS Hospital Trust, London, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This is a cross sectional ophthalmic clinic-based study to estimate the prevalence and severity of pterygium in a selected population in the Amazon Basin, Brazil.

METHODS: The study included 225 subjects above 20 years age from three different places of residence of Manaus city (group 1, n=89), river based communities (group 2, n= 116) and indigenous rainforest inhabitants (group 3, n=20). Pterygia was graded 1-4 by torch examination and gender, age and occupation determined.

RESULTS: were assessed to have pterygia (grades 2-4) 117 people; 52% against 108 control subjects with bilateral disease in 43% of subjects. Prevalence of grades 2-4 increased from 36% in group 1 to 62.5 % in group 2 and 75% in group 3. Of these subjects the percentage with outdoor professions increased across the groups from 31.2% to 67.1 % and 70% respectively. Also subjects of group 2 who worked largely outdoors, showed increasing pterygia severity, from grades 2 at 57% (p=0.0002), grade 3 at 93.3% (p,0.0001) to grade 4 at 100% (p=0.0004

CONCLUSION: Amazonian communities have a high prevalence of pterygia, which correlates to greater outdoor occupation and sun exposure. This study agrees with previous worldwide reports and it is the first study to compare the prevalence of pterygium in rural and urban living in Amazonian in Brazil. This study highlights the public health significance and gross need for intervention studies.

Keywords: Pterygium/epidemiology; Prevalence; Public health; Severity of illness index; Sunlight

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Este é um estudo clínico oftálmico transversal para estimar a prevalência e gravidade de pterígios em uma população específica na bacia Amazônica, Brasil.

MÉTODOS: O estudo incluiu 225 indivíduos acima de 20 anos de idade, oriundos de três diferentes residências na cidade de Manaus (grupo 1, n = 89), comunidades ribeirinhas (grupo 2, n = 116) e indígenas que habitam nas florestas (grupo 3, n = 20). Pterígios foram classificados de 1-4 pelo exame com tocha e determinando-se sexo, idade e ocupação.

RESULTADOS: Foram diagnosticadas 117 pessoas com pterígio (graus 2-4); 52% contra 108 indivíduos com doença bilateral em 43% dos indivíduos. Prevalência de graus 2-4 aumentou de 36% no grupo 1 para 62,5% no grupo 2 e 75% no grupo 3. Dentre estes indivíduos, o percentual com profissões ao ar livre aumentou entre os grupos para 31,2%, 67,1% e 70%, respectivamente. Além disso, indivíduos do grupo 2 que trabalhavam em grande parte ao ar livre, mostrou aumento da gravidade do pterígio, com grau 2 a 57% (p=0.0002), grau 3 a 93.3% (p,0.0001) e grau 4 a 100% (p=0.0004).

CONCLUSÃO: Comunidades amazônicas têm uma alta prevalência de pterígios, que se correlaciona com maior ocupação ao ar livre e exposição ao sol. Este estudo concorda com relatórios anteriores em todo o mundo e é o primeiro estudo a comparar a prevalência de pterígio nas zonas rural e urbana da Amazônia no Brasil. Este estudo destaca a importância da saúde pública e a necessidade de estudos de intervenção.

Descritores: Pterígio/epidemiologia; Prevalência; Saúde pública; Índice de gravidade da doença; Luz solar

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide studies associate risk factors such as ultraviolet sunlight exposure, dry climatic conditions and genetics with the development of pterygia^(1-5). Usually pterygia are small and asymptomatic conjunctival 'wing - shaped' extensions on to the cornea, but when large may produce discomfort, poor cosmetic appearance and loss of visual acuity, which requires surgery to correct^(6,7).

The aim of this project was to determine and compare the severity and prevalence of pterygia within three different population groups in an ophthalmic clinic setting based on location within the Amazon basin, Brazil.

METHODS

A random observational cross sectional study of 225 subjects was carried out within the tropical Amazon basin of Brazil, 3 degrees south of the equator. Subjects were divided into three groups based on place of residence. The Amazonian urban capital city of Manaus, population 1,634,000 was classed group 1 (n= 89), with data collated from general ophthalmology clinics held at the Institute de Ophthalmology, Manaus. Smaller community held clinics in Borba and Manacapuru, which are located on Amazon River tributaries interior to Manaus (population 35,525 and 83,703 respectively) formed group 2 (n=116). Group 3 (n=20) comprised. of indigenous rainforest inhabitants from the Muru tribe, of uncertain population, who live by fishing and farming and were few in number as they had travelled long distances to visit relatives within Borba where they were assessed for this study.

All participants were over 20 years of age and within groups 1 and 2 selected randomly from alternating seats in the clinic waiting rooms. Data from group 3 was collected from inhabitants of alternating huts specifically accommodating visiting indigenous population. Informed consent was gained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and institutional review board approval sought from The Institute of Ophthalmology, Manaus, Amazonia, Brazil. In addition to their age and place of residence (groups 1-3), the subjects were asked their current occupation. Occupation was classed as either predominantly 'indoor' (cleaners, office workers, teachers) or 'outdoor' (motorcycle taxi drivers, farmers, fishermen) and interpreted as a direct surrogate to sunlight daily exposure, with > 5 hours/day for outdoor occupations and < 5hours/day for indoor occupations. Subjects were also asked about use of sunhats, sunglasses and motorcycle helmets where appropriate.

Each eye was assessed for pterygia using a pen torch by one trained person only. Grading was on a scale of 1-4 as shown in figure 1. Grade 1 pterygium can be mistaken for pinguecula, an eye condition previously, but incorrectly, thought to degenerate to produce pterygia, and so was not recorded in this study.^(2,3) Where one eye had temporal and nasal pterygia of differing severities, or there was bilateral involvement, the more severe form was recorded for grading purposes.

RESULTS

Within the three study groups, 117 of the 225 subjects (52%) had pterygia. Ages ranged from 21 to 61 years (mean - 47.7 years). The occurrence of right and left eye pterygia was of a similar distribution at 31% and 26% respectively, with a relatively high bilateral prevalence result of 43%.

There was no statistically significant relationship between gender and pterygia across groups 1, 2 and 3 with p values of 0.1077, 0.2203 and 0.1967 respectively as shown in table 1. The more severe grades of pterygia within group 1 were however associated with the male gender, a trend also seen within groups 2 and 3, with for example grade 3 recorded in 66.6% of males in group 2 as shown in table 2.

Table 1 shows the predominance of pterygia across all groups around the ages 31- 50 years. The most severe form of grade 4 across all groups was only recorded in patients above 41 years of age.

The results suggest a strong correlation between the prevalence of pterygia and place of residence. Group 1 has a percentage prevalence of 36% (CI 30.8- 63.6) which increases to 62.5% (CI 53.2- 70.9) in group 2 and is greatest at 75.0% (CI 53.1- 88.9) in group 3. This is a trend observed across the three groups with increasing severity of pterygia, where the indigenous sample in group 3 showed the greatest prevalence of all three grades. For example grade 3 pterygium showed a percentage prevalence of 4.5% (p<0.0001) in group 1, 13.4% (p<0.0001) in group 2 and was greatest at 20% (p=0.07) within the indigenous group 3 (Table 2).

Accordingly as shown in Table 1, those with pterygia had increasing sunlight exposure of > 5 hours/day across the groups with 31.2% in group 1, 67.1 % in group 2 and 93.3% in group 3 having an outdoor profession. Statistical interpretation showed this to be a significant finding for groups 1 and 2 with x² of 11.09 (p=0.0009) and x² 25.16 (p< 0.0001) respectively.

Comparing exposure to > 5 hours/ day sunlight with severity of pterygia (Table 2) shows an upward trend within the three groups. For example grade 2 pterygia in correlation with sun exposure increases from 30% in group 1 to 57% in group 2 to 100% in group 3. The results are significant within group 2 (Borba/ Manacapuru) for grade 2 at 57% (x²) 12.37 p=0.0004), grade 3 at 93.3% (x² 26.2 p<0.0001) and grade 4 at 100% (x² 12.37 p=0.0004). This significant relationship was also observed in group1 subjects with > 5 hours sunlight/day and pterygia grades 2 and 3. Although group 3 showed a high prevalence of the more severe forms of pterygia, the study sample was too small for the data to be statistically significant as shown in table 2.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge this is the first study of pterygia within the Amazon to compare rural and urban living with patterns amongst a Brazilian population. This study was hospital based with a single person assessing all individuals by handlight to reduce bias.

Pterygium is reported to be more prevalent at tropical latitudes.⁽³⁾ Our overall prevalence of pterygia was 52 % and studies in central Myanmar, of tropical climate, showed a pterygia prevalence of 19.6%⁽⁸⁾. Both studies have prevalence rates greater than the 1.2% recorded within an urban Melbourne Australian temperate climate population⁽⁷⁾.

Our prevalence of bilateral pterygium (43%) agrees with Jordanian studies led by Al-Bdour et al., where 44% of subjects showed bilateral eye disease⁽³⁾, but is lower than that recorded from Indonesian Archipelago studies (71.6%).⁽⁹⁾ Reports by Saw et al., 1999 suggest that pterygium occurs first in the eye which is held open when facing the sun, or the dominant eye^(10,11). The level of right and left eye disease in our study was 31% and 26% respectively.

The results show pterygia is commonest between 31-50 years of age, with more severe grades noted in the elderly population of the indigenous sample and in Borba/ Manacapuru. There was no statistical relationship with age. This finding is shared by a case control study in Perth, Western Australia and highlights that intervention studies will benefit all age groups⁽¹²⁾.

Our study, like that by Paula et al.⁽¹³⁾ within two indigenous Amazonian rainforest communities, showed no correlation between sex and pterygia. This is in contrast to studies led by Al- Bdour et al. within Jordan, a country where males predominantly have outdoor jobs.⁽³⁾ However within the Amazon region, outdoor occupations are not exclusively male dominated and gender is not surrogate for outdoor occupation, making gender a variable association across studies.^(3,14,15) The Amazonian study with 624 indigenous subjects from two tribes, showed the levels of pterygia to vary from 36.6% for the group who live by river fishing to 13.7% in the second group who live by hunting within the rainforest under the sun protective forest canopy. It was suggested that the social factor of length of time spent exposed to the sun led to the prevalence difference between the two groups⁽¹³⁾.

A clear prevalence increase of pterygia was seen across the groups of this study. The greatest prevalence was within group 3 of the Muru tribe (75%), where the population live a life of boat transport and self sufficient living by farming and fishing. Group 2 (Borba/ Manacapuru) with pterygia prevalence of 62.5 %, form communities reached by boat or airplane with limited public transport, or none in the case of Borba. Though the use of motorbike helmets is compulsory in Brazil, from observations and questionnaire within Borba, the motorbike owners rarely wore helmets, sunglasses or sun hats, especially motorbike passengers, a finding also noted in Manacapuru. In comparison, Manaus (group 1) where prevalence is at 36%, has a public transport infrastructure, more indoor occupations and motorbike riders generally wear helmets as the roads are more hazardous and a fine from a traffic officer is more likely. An Australian study comparing urban and rural living showed rural levels of pterygia to be five times as high as urban residents with UVB/ sunlight as the main risk factor^(7,8). Also the Barbados Study with 4709 participants showed that outdoor workers had a pterygia level twice frequent, but the level was only one fifth if the study group always wore sunglasses outdoors⁽¹⁴⁾.

Data collected highlighted that within the Amazon there is little knowledge that pterygium is, in part, due to excessive sunlight exposure. With a high recurrence rate post surgery and with limited access to surgery in remote communities, where the majority earn the minimum wage or less, there would be significant benefit from a national Brazilian campaign to highlight pterygia and how it can be prevented or delayed in development.^(14-17) It is reported that an Australian in Perth, with 30 years sunlight exposure of 3 hours a day with no sunglasses or hat, would have a 77% lifetime reduction in sun exposure, if a hat and sunglasses were used for ten years⁽¹²⁾. A public health campaign would improve visual acuity, cosmesis and reduce national costs for pterygia management. Studies in 2001 showed Australia to spend yearly $AUD 8.3 million on therapeutic and surgical intervention against pterygia⁽¹⁸⁾.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion pterygium has a multi-factorial pathogenesis and within this Amazonian population is of endemic proportions. This study showed pterygia to have the greatest correlation with daily exposure to sunlight, although the design was largely limited to ophthalmic clinic patients and so does not reflect a true random sample of the three studied populations. In hypothesis this may lead to an overestimation of the true prevalence of pterygium; however the patients attending ophthalmic clinics are inclusive of those seeking refraction and so reflect a wider population base. A larger representative sample for group three would be preferred however the high prevalence of pterygia in the three study group specifically in association to sunlight does highlight a clear requirement for necessary educational intervention studies. Such intervention should be aimed especially towards outdoor communities and highlight the importance of sunglasses and sunhats.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank consultant Ophthalmologist Mr. Jacob Cohen and the Ophthalmologists Sergio Duarte, Maurício Vulcão Vasconcelos and Erica of the Institute of Ophthalmology, Manaus, Amazonia, Brazil. Also kind thanks are expressed to Borba's municipal employees Aldine Mirella de Souza e Freitas, Charute and also Andre for translation with the Muru participants. We are grateful to The Wellcome Trust and The Worshipful Company of Barbers, London for funding this research.

Recebido para publicação em: 2/9/2011

Aceito para publicação em: 27/5/2012

Conflict-of-interest disclosure : None of the authors have any proprietary interests or conflicts of interest related to this submission. The work received research funding from the The Wellcome Trust and The Worshipful Company of Barbers, London.

• ¹
  Schwab L. Eye care in developing nations. 3rd ed. San Francisco: The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1999.
• ²
  Sachsenweger R. Illustrated handbook of ophthalmology. Chicago: Wright; 1980.
• ³
  Al-Bdour M, Al-Latayfeh MM. Risk factors for pterygium in an adult Jordanian population. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82(1): 64-7.
• ⁴
  Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK, Tan DT. The prevalence and risk factors for pterygium in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131(2):176-83.
• ⁵
  Gazzard G, Saw SM, Farook M, Koh D, Widjaja D, Chia SE, et al. Pterygium in Indonesia: prevalence, severity and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(12):1341-6.
• ⁶
  Maheshwari S. Effect of pterygium excision on pterygium induced astigmatism. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51(2):187-8.
• ⁷
  McCarty CA, Fu CL, Taylor HR. Epidemiology of pterygium in Victoria, Australia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(3):289-92.
• ⁸
  Durkin SR, Abhary S, Newland HS, Selva D, Aung T, Casson RJ. The prevalence, severity and risk factors for pterygium in central Mynmar: the Meiktila Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(1):25-9.
• ⁹
  Tan CS, Lim TH, Koh WP, Liew GC, Hoh ST, Tan CC, Au Eong KG. Epidemiology of pterygium on a tropical island in the Riau Archipelago. Eye (Lond). 2006;20(8):908-12.
• ¹⁰
  Saw SM, Tan D. Pterygium: prevalence, demography and risk factors. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999;6(3):219-28
• ¹¹
  Saw SM, Banerjee K, Tan D. Risk factors for the development of pterygium in Singapore: a hospital- based case-control study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78(2):216-20.
• ¹²
  Threlfall TJ, English DR. Sun exposure and pterygium of the eye: a dose- response curve. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(3):280-7.
• ¹³
  Paula JS, Thorn F, Cruz AA. Prevalence of pterygium and cataract in indigenous populations of the Brazilian Amazon rain forest. Eye (Lond). 2006;20(5):533-6.
• ¹⁴
  Luthra R, Nemesure BB, Wu SY, Xie SH, Leske MC; Barbados Eye Studies Group. Frequency and risk factors for pterygium in the Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12): 1827-32.
• ¹⁵
  Khoo J, Saw SM, Banerjee K, Chia SE, Tan D. Outdoor work and the risk of pterygia: a case-control study. Int Ophthalmol. 1998;22(5):293-8.
• ¹⁶
  Solomon AS. Pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(6):665-6. Comment on Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(6):769-72.
• ¹⁷
  Coroneo MT, Di Girolamo N, Wakefield D. The pathogenesis of pterygia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10(4):282-8.
• ¹⁸
  Wlodarczyk J, Whyte P, Cockrum P, Taylor H. Pterygium in Australia: a cost of illness study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2001;29(6):370-5. Comment in Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2002;30(4):312.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  04 Jan 2013
• Date of issue
  Dec 2012

History

• Received
  02 Sept 2011
• Accepted
  27 May 2012