SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.72 issue4Correlations of straylight, aberrometry, and lens scattering in cataract patientsLaser photocoagulation for peripheral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia

Print version ISSN 0034-7280

Rev. bras.oftalmol. vol.72 no.4 Rio de Janeiro July/Aug. 2013

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72802013000400008 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Long-term failure after transpupillary thermotherapy for small choroidal melanomas

 

 

Gabriela Soncini PasettoI; Henrique Pedroso de FreitasI; Carina Graziottin ColossiII; Manuel Augusto Pereira VilelaIII

IPhysicians at the Specialisation Course in Ophthalmology Professor Ivo Corrêa-Meyer. Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
IIM.Sc., Preceptor at the Specialisation Course Professor Ivo Corrêa-Meyer. Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
IIIPh.D., Professor of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas/RS, Brazil

Corresponding author

 

 


ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, retrospectively, in a long time interval, the results of transpupillary thermotherapy in selected cases of choroidal melanoma (CM).
METHODS: All patients with melanoma treated with transpupillary thermotherapy as sole therapy or supplement were identified. Cases with less than 60 months follow-up, incomplete records or abandonment of monitoring were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 18 eyes, seven (38.9%) were included. Five (71,4%) patients were treated exclusively with transpupillary thermotherapy, in one (14,2%) eye criotherapy was used simultaneously, one (14,2%) was supplemented with brachytherapy - episcleral plate. Three (42.8%) had recurrence, two (28.5%) had metastases (one death), two eyes were enucleated. Complications were found in three eyes: two with macular folds, one with vitreous hemorrhage. In the enucleated eyes, extraescleral did not occur, however intrascleral tumoral cells were identified.
CONCLUSION: Transpupillary thermotherapy shows a decline in its effectiveness and retains the risk of metastases in longer periods of follow-up, requiring a more exact definition of its role in choroidal melanoma.

Keywords: Melanoma/therapy; Choroidal; Hyperthermia, induced/methods


 

 

Introduction

Melanoma is the most frequent primary tumour of the eyeball. In its early stages it may be indistinguishable from a melanocytic nevus(1). It usually grows as a globular mass protruding toward the vitreous cavity(1,2). Ocular melanocytes are generally concentrated on the pigment epithelium, the uvea, and the conjunctival stroma. These cells have the same embryological origin of skin cells, i.e. the neural crest(3).

Specifically, choroidal melanoma (CM) occurs more frequently in the posterior pole and can present three different pigmentation patterns: amelanotic, densely pigmented, or mixed. In terms of appearance, the lesions may be nodular, multinodular, or diffuse(3).

For many years, enucleation was the treatment of choice for the condition. Currently, alternative therapeutic methods have been adopted that preserve the eyeball, and even its function, but without affecting the survival rate or the metastatic potential. These alternative therapeutic choices should take into account the patient's overall clinical condition, the affected eye's visual acuity and intraocular pressure, and the tumour's size, location, growth pattern, and activity(4). Within certain limits, expectant management is adequate; otherwise, therapeutic options include thermotherapy, brachytherapy, external radiotherapy, and surgical resection, among others.

Transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) has emerged as a therapeutic option since 1998(1,2). In this technique, a laser beam - infrared radiation - is applied through the pupil to raise the temperature and destroy tumour tissue through cytotoxicity(1,3). The method can produce necrosis up to a maximum depth of 3.9 mm without affecting structures outside the treatment field. Its advantages include a limited field of action, the fact that it does not need to be conducted in an operating theatre, the preservation of the organ and its function (patients with extra-macular foci may retain good visual acuity), and good survival rates(1-4).

The aim of this study was to describe the long-term clinical course (60 months or more) of cases of CM treated with TTT, comparing them with different management alternatives.

 

Methods

We studied cases of CM treated with TTT that had a minimum follow-up time of 60 months. Inclusion criteria were patients treated exclusively with TTT, patients who received "sandwich" therapy with TTT plus cryotherapy in the same surgical act, and patients who received TTT plus brachytherapy. Exclusion criteria were incomplete patient charts, a shorter follow-up period, and treatment dropouts.

The criteria and the technique adopted to indicate and perform TTT can be found in other sources(4); essentially, the method was limited to tumours up to 4 mm thick and 12 mm in diameter on ultrasound. Treatment was administered using a slit lamp (Opto, Brazil) under peribulbar block. Each patient had their demographic data collected and underwent an assessment of corrected visual acuity using Snellen's chart, assessment of extraocular movements, applanation tonometry, biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, and indirect binocular fundus examination. Retinography and fluorescein angiography were performed before the procedure and every 6 months afterwards. An oncological evaluation was performed every 6 months, with laboratory tests, ultrasound imaging, CT, and, in some cases, PET scan imaging. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pelotas under number 00184/10.

 

Results

Seven eyes of patients (four women) with MC were identified using the set criteria. Mean age was 58.8 years, ranging from 45 to 72 years. Of these, 5 (71.4%) were treated with TTT only, 1 (14.2%) with TTT plus cryotherapy, and 1 (14.2%) with TTT plus episcleral plaque. Mean tumour thickness was 3.7 mm, with a diameter of 5.35 mm. The mean follow-up time was 75.4 months (Table 1).

Among patients treated exclusively with TTT (5 eyes), 3 ( 60%) progressed with tumour control, 1 (20%) with tumour growth compared to the original lesion, and 1 (20%) with metastasis. Among those with tumour control, one (20%) developed vitreous haemorrhage (with spontaneous clearing within 3 weeks) and 1 (20%) developed macular folds. The patient who progressed with tumour regrowth (20%) underwent enucleation, and the patient with metastasis (20%) died after a follow-up of 65 months.

Disease control was not achieved in the patient who underwent TTT plus cryotherapy (14.2%), with tumour regrowth and macular folds. Its final result was enucleation.

The patient treated with TTT plus episcleral plaque (14.2%) progressed with lung metastasis. This patient had been originally treated with brachytherapy only; however, tumour recurrence was observed at the edges, leading to TTT. Treatment was then supplemented with brachytherapy and episcleral plaque. The patient underwent lobe resection on both lungs and is under oncological follow-up. She has been followed-up for 96 months and has progressed to phthisis bulbi.

Histological examination of enucleated eyes found no extrascleral extension, but tumour cells were found in the scleral stroma.

Of the three eyes successfully treated (all exclusively with TTT), two suffered a significant loss of central vision: one due to macular folds and the other due to the submacular location of the mass (Figures 1-4).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

Recent study results have led to a more cautious, less enthusiastic approach towards TTT in the treatment of CM, mainly because of the detection of viable tumour cells in the scleral parenchyma during follow-up. The depth to be reached can limit the method's efficiency, either in primary applications or reapplications(5-12).

The choice to use TTT is based on the possibility of managing small lesions with a simple procedure that preserves the eyeball and, on certain cases, visual acuity. Early studies on TTT reported satisfactory and replicable results, but they had a short follow-up time(1-4). More recently, different publications have supported a more cautious approach, and there is disagreement regarding the method's results and complications. The detection of treatment failures (local or distant metastases) depends on the study's follow-up period(6-11).

Successful therapy with tumour control is achieved in 60-100% of cases, with patients undergoing 1-4 TTT sessions. However, the therapy's long-term results are controversial, with recent evidence suggesting that the method may be unable to destroy deeper tumour cells. In our study, the 2 cases that progressed to enucleation had tumour cells in the scleral lamellae, without extraocular extension - histopathological features similar to those described by Zaldivar and colleagues(5).

The need for supplemental therapy is based mainly on the detection of tumour growth (in its thickness or margins) and subretinal fluid. Studies assessing the response to retreatment have also found divergent results, which may be due to different management strategies, but mainly due to differences in follow-up time.

Our study was limited due to its small, heterogeneous sample and its retrospective design. Still, we found a high frequency of tumour regrowth and metastasis.

Questions remain about the condition's natural history and the influence of treatment on the prognosis of CM(12). Factors that may predict a poor prognosis include: tumour size(13-15), old age(16), tumour thickness(17), and involvement of the ciliary body(18). It is believed that a small, light CM takes 7 years to grow and another 4 years to develop metastases(12,18,19). The mortality rate of uveal melanoma is 31% in 5 years, 45% in 15 years, 49% in 25 years, and 52% in 35 years(12).

 

Conclusion

TTT in tumours up to 4 x 12 mm shows low effectiveness and does not eliminate the risk of metastasis in longer follow-up periods. Its role in the treatment of CM needs to be more clearly defined.

 

References

1. Journeé-de Korver JG, Oosterhuis JA, de Wolff-Rouendaal D, Kemme H. Histopathological findings in human choroidal melanomas after transpupillary thermotherapy. Brit J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(3):234-9.         [ Links ]

2. Oosterhuis JA, Journée-de Korver HG, Kakebeeke-Kemme HM, Bleeker JC. Transpupillary thermotherapy in choroidal melanomas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(3):315-21.         [ Links ]

3. Robertson DM, Buettner H, Bennett SR. Transpupillary thermotherapy as primary treatment for small choroidal melanomas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(11):1512-9.         [ Links ]

4. Shields CL, Shields JA, Perez N, Singh AD, Cater J. Primary transpupillary thermotherapy for small choroidal melanoma in 256 consecutive cases: outcomes and limitations. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(4):225-34.         [ Links ]

5. Zaldivar RA, Aaberg TM, Sternberg P Jr, Waldron R, Grossniklaus HE. Clinicopathologic findings in choroidal melanomas after failed transpupillary thermotherapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5): 657-63.         [ Links ]

6. Parrozzani R, Boccassini B, De Belvis V, Radin PP, Midema E. Long-term outcome of transpupillary thermotherapy as primary treatment of selected choroidal melanoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(7):789-92.         [ Links ]

7. Fuisting B, Richard G. Transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) - review of the clinically indication spectrum. Med Laser Applic. 2010;25(4):214-22. Edited By B.M. Stoffelns and S. Wolf        [ Links ]

8. Win PH, Robertson DM, Buettner H, McCannel CA, Bennett SR. Extended follow-up of small melanocytic choroidal tumors treated with transpupillary thermotherapy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(4):503-6.         [ Links ]

9. Chojniak MM, Guia T, Uno F, Erwenne CM. Termoterapia transpupilar em melanoma maligno de coróide. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2001;64(2):133-8.         [ Links ]

10. Stoffelns BM, Schoepfer K, Vetter J, Mirshahi A, Elflein H. [Long-term follow-up 10 years after transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) for small, posterior located malignant melanomas of the choroid]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011;228(4):277-83. German.         [ Links ]

11. Yarovoy AA, Magaramov DA, Bulgakova ES. Which choroidal melanoma should be treated with primary transpupillary thermotherapy? Our experience from 78 patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20(1):186-93.         [ Links ]

12. Bel DJ, Wilson MW. Choroidal melanoma: natural history and management options. Cancer Control. 2004;11(5):296-303.         [ Links ]

13. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trial of pre-enucleation radiation of large choroidal melanoma II: initial mortality findings. COMS report no. 10. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(6):779-96. Comment in Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(6):865-7.         [ Links ]

14. Mooy CM, De Jong PT. Prognostic parameters in uveal melanoma: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;41(3):215-28.         [ Links ]

15. Damato B, Coupland SE. A reappraisal of the significance of largest basal diameter of posterior uveal melanoma. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(12):2152-60; quiz 2161-2.         [ Links ]

16. Seddon JM, Albert DM, Lavin PT, Robinson N. A prognostic factor study of disease-free interval and survival following enucleation for uveal melanoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1983;101(12):1894-9.         [ Links ]

17. Shields CL, Furuta M, Thangappan A, Nagori S, Mashayekhi A, Lally DR, et al. Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033 consecutive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(8):989-98.         [ Links ]

18. Zimmerman LE, McLean IW, Foster WD. Statistical analysis of follow- up data concerning uveal melanomas, and the influence of enucleation. Ophthalmology. 1980;87(6):557-64.         [ Links ]

19. McLean IW, Foster WD, Zimmerman LE, Martin DG. Inferred natural history of uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980;19(7):760-70.         [ Links ]

 

 

Corresponding author:
Gabriela Soncini Pasetto
Rua Félix da Cunha 496 Bairro Floresta
CEP: 90570-000 - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil
E-mail: gabisp_pel@hotmail.com

Recebido para publicação em 24/4/2012
Aceito para publicação em 24/10/2012
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

Study conducted at the Federal University of Pelotas and the Specialisation Course in Ophthalmology Prof. Ivo Corrêa-Meyer, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License