SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.73 issue1Knowledge about glaucoma and epidemiological profile of subjects seen in a campaign conducted at the University Hospital Lauro WanderleyAtypical progression of visual loss in a patient with primary open-angle glaucoma author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia

Print version ISSN 0034-7280

Rev. bras.oftalmol. vol.73 no.1 Rio de Janeiro Jan./Feb. 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20140008 

Case Reports

Relevancy of corneal biomechanical in glaucoma

Jorge Augusto Siqueira da Silva1 

Renata Siqueira da Silva2  3 

Renato Ambrósio Jr2  3 

13rd year Resident, Centre for Eye Studies and Research (CEPOA), Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil.

2Member of the Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil.

3Renato Ambrósio Eye Institute, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil.

ABSTRACT

Case report of a patient, with a thick cornea, for Fuchs dystrophy in its early stages, yet with preserved corneal transparency (subclinical corneal edema), associated with normal intraocular pressure (IOP) by Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT), which was however, the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma on the basis of structural changes of the optic nerve. The tomographic study showed a pattern of spatial pachymetry compatible with subclinical edema. The corneal biomechanical study with ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer, Reichert ®) associated with corrected IOP measurement, allowed the understanding of the corneal influence, which, although thicker, leading to a falsely low TAG (underestimated). The IOP study with tonography system digital (PASCAL) corroborated with the findings of ORA. This example highlights the importance of new technologies in patients' evaluation with suspected glaucoma, and highlights that the correction of TAG, based on linear algorithms related to central corneal thickness alone, can determine serious errors in clinical interpretation.

Key words: Cornea/physiology; Glaucoma; ORA; Fuchs endothelial dystrophy; Tonometry, ocular/methods; Case reports

Introduction

Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy with characteristic lesions that cause specific visual field defects.1,2 Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important risk factor and is also the focus of therapy aimed at controlling the disease.3,4 Changes in corneal structure lead to changes in IOP values as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).5,6 The cornea has therefore become the object of study in glaucomatous injury, mainly through central pachymetry, which measures central corneal thickness (CCT). According to Ambrósio, mean CCT in the population is 556 microns, with a standard deviation of 35 microns, ranging between 454 and 669 microns.7 CCT has been shown to be the most important risk factor in patients with high IOP.8 This is due to the fact that GAT tends to underestimate IOP in thin corneas; as a result, these patients may not receive treatment,9,10 which increases the risk of progressive optic nerve cupping due to damage caused by the persistently elevated IOP.

The prediction model that combines data from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) and the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group (EGPS) estimates that for a 40-micron decrease in CCT the risk of glaucomatous damage in five years is doubled.

Other corneal parameters, such as keratometry, also have an important influence on the error of IOP measurement by applanation, which is overestimated in thicker and steeper corneas. Given these facts, new parameters may be needed to better assess the cornea, which is a critical element in the follow-up of glaucoma patients.

Pachymetry is a key test in the evaluation of these patients, but its results can be misinterpreted when used alone; thus, new technologies such as the ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer, Reichert™) device need to be used.

The ORA is an air-puff tonometer that uses an air pulse whose intensity is very well controlled and monitored, with symmetrical upward and downward phases. The test takes about 20 milliseconds. The air pulse causes a deformation of the corneal surface, which first undergoes a moment of applanation, identified as a peak in the corneal reflex. The pressure then causes the cornea to become slightly concave, returning to its original state after undergoing a second stage of applanation (Figure 1). The behaviour of the cornea and the signal obtained during the test represent its biomechanical properties. The difference between pressures in the two applanation moments is related to the viscoelastic capacity of the cornea to store energy, called hysteresis.

Figure 1 ORA signal 

Four parameters are obtained in the current version of the ORA software:11

  • - Goldman-correlated IOP (IOPg)

  • - Corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc)

  • - Corneal hysteresis (CH)

  • - Corneal resistance factor (CRF)

  • . Stage 1: First corneal applanation

  • . Stage 2: Cornea becomes slightly concave

  • . Stage 3: Second corneal applanation

The method provides an assessment of biomechanical changes in the cornea, observed as a significant decrease in the cornea's viscoelastic ability to absorb energy from the symmetrical air pulse11 (its upward phase is identical to its downward phase).

Case report

54-year-old white female housewife born in Rio de Janeiro with no pre-existing ocular disorders, undergoing treatment for high blood pressure with captopril 25 mg twice daily, complaining of reduced visual acuity in both eyes (BE), more severe on the right eye (RE). Her mother suffered from glaucoma. Ophthalmic examination showed an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/150 in BE and a corrected visual acuity of 20/40 and 20/30 (+1.75 = -0.50 x 90º - 20/40; +1.50 = -0.50 x 85º - 20/30).

GAT was 18 mmHg in the RE and 17 mmHg in the left eye (LE) at 5 pm. Slit lamp examination (biomicroscopy) showed transparent corneas in BE, with guttata 2+/4+ (Figure 2), grade 2 nuclear cataract, and mild posterior subcapsular cataract. On gonioscopy, open angle to the scleral spur in the four quadrants in BE. Perimetry showed a diffuse loss of sensitivity in BE without specific changes.

Figure 2 Specular microscopy 

Central corneal thickness was measured by pachymetry, showing 620 microns in BE.7 Non-contact air-puff tonometry (ORA), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT-Pascal™, Ziemer), and a tomography12,13 of the cornea and anterior segment using Scheimpflug photography13,14 were performed. The following values were found: CH, 7.9 and 8.1 mmHg (normal mean value, 10.17); IOPcc, 26.1 and 24.2 mmHg; IOPg, 18.1 and 17.9 mmHg; DCT-PASCAL: 27.2 and 26.5 mmHg. Tomography of the cornea and anterior segment showed a pattern compatible with subclinical oedema. This pattern occurs when the pachymetric progression profile is straightened or horizontal (Figure 3).12 Simple retinography of the optic nerve showed increased and asymmetric cupping, 0.8 x 0.8 and 0.6 x 0.6 in the RE and LE, respectively. There were no changes in the macula, and the retina was attached in all quadrants.

Figure 3 Spatial pachymetric progression curve12 showing a straightened pattern 

Discussion

Since the publication of the OHTS study in 2002, CCT is known to be the most important predictive factor for the development of glaucoma in patients with high IOP. It is clear that IOP measurement is overestimated in thick corneas and underestimated in thin corneas.

However, thickened corneas due to oedema have a reduced resistance, producing an effect similar to thin corneas in GAT.7

Thus, it is clear that pachymetry remains very important for corneal assessment in glaucoma patients. However, when used alone it can lead to diagnostic errors, hindering adequate disease management.

In the case presented here, evaluation of corneal biomechanics and computed tomography with ORA and Pentacam were essential for adequate assessment of a patient with corneal oedema due to Fuchs dystrophy. These tests revealed that the patient's IOP had been underestimated, which enabled adequate treatment and control.

It is important to note that in order to unequivocally determine which IOP measurement (GAT, ORA or PASCAL) was correct, it would be necessary to assess the pressure in the anterior chamber using a direct invasive method to measure hydrostatic pressure. However, this kind of procedure is clinically impractical.

Conclusion

The case presented here shows beyond any doubt that the cornea influences IOP measurements by GAT. However, such influence is more complex than anticipated by linear algorithms that consider central pachymetry only. In this case, a serious misinterpretation would occur if only GAT values and the relatively high central pachymetry were considered, because the elevated IOP would be missed. The diagnosis of glaucoma is based on optic nerve findings.

However, biomechanical studies and CT enabled a correct interpretation of the influence of the cornea on GAT, thus identifying the patient's ocular hypertension and diagnosing a primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Such tests should be considered in the evaluation of patients with suspected glaucoma as well as during their clinical follow-up.

Renato Ambrósio Eye Institute, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil.

REFERENCES

1. Mello PAA, Susanna Júnior R. Glaucoma. Rio de Janeiro: Cultura Médica; 2009. p.111-35. (Série Oftalmologia Brasileira). [ Links ]

2. Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, editors. The glaucomas. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 753-65. [ Links ]

3. Kanski JJ. Oftalmologia clínica: uma abordagem sistemática. 6a. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2008. p. 372-89 [ Links ]

4. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. [Applanation tonometry]. Ophthalmologica. 1957;134(4):221-42. German. [ Links ]

5. Campos M, Ambrósio Júnior R, Chamon W. Cirurgia refrativa. Rio de Janeiro: Cultura Médica; 2008. p. 136-141. (Série Oftalmologia Brasileira). [ Links ]

6. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-62. [ Links ]

7. Ambrósio R Jr, Klyce SD, Wilson SE. Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients. J Refract Surg 2003;19(1):24-9. [ Links ]

8. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714-20; discussion 829-30. [ Links ]

9. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group; European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group, Gordon MO, Torri V, Miglior S, Beiser JA, Floriani I, Miller JP, et al. Validated prediction model for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):10-9. [ Links ]

10. Valbon BF, Guerra F, Silva RS, Canedo AL, Ambrósio Júnior R. Hipertensão ocular "mascarada" por edema de córnea após cirurgia de catarata. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2009;68(6):348-54. [ Links ]

11. Anand A, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Corneal hysteresis and visual field asymmetry in open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(12):6514-8. [ Links ]

12. Ambrósio R Jr, Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(11):1851-9. [ Links ]

13. Ambrósio R Jr, Belin MW. Imaging of the cornea: topography vs tomography. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(11):847-9. [ Links ]

14. Netto MV, Ambrósio Júnior R, Schor P, Chalita MR, Chamon W, editores. Wavefront, topografia e tomografia da córnea e segmento anterior: atualização propedêutica em cirurgia refrativa. Rio de Janeiro: Cultura Médica; 2006. p. 141-9. [ Links ]

Received: February 03, 2011; Accepted: June 21, 2011

Corresponding author: Jorge Augusto Siqueira da Silva, Rua Mem de Sá, 169 / 904, Icaraí, Niterói/RJ, Brazil - E-mail: jorgejass@ig.com.br / jorgejass1@yahoo.com.br