Laryngeal foreign body causing bronchial spasm

laryngeal foreign body; recurrent bronchial spasm

CASE REPORT

Laryngeal foreign body causing bronchial spasm

Giulliano Enrico Ruschi e Luchi^I; Jose Jarjura Jorge Junior^II; Cassio Caldini Crespo^III; Jaime Nakasima^IV; Fabio Eduardo Caramante Pizzini^V; Rogerio Poli Swensson^VI; Pedro Robson Boldorini^VII

^IOtolaryngologist, MSc student at the School of Medical Sciences - Santa Casa de São Paulo

^IIPhD in Otolaryngology, Full Professor of Otolaryngology at PUC-SP

^IIIOtolaryngologist, Professor of Otolaryngology at PUC-SP

^IVOtolaryngologist

^VOtolaryngologist

^VIResident

^VIIOtolaryngologist

^{Mailing Address}

Keywords: laryngeal foreign body, recurrent bronchial spasm.

INTRODUCTION

Foreign bodies (FB) in the larynx and trachea usually lead to alarming circumstances, with death by complete obstruction of the respiratory tract as its utter consequence. Incidence rates are not high (2-11% of respiratory tract foreign bodies). Children from 6 months to 4 years of age are the most frequently affected, as expected due to their yet immature swallowing neuromuscular mechanism and the oral stage. In general terms, inhaling FB produces intense coughing and suffocation, and possibly cyanosis, asphyxia, sweating, vomiting, and dysphonia. Larynx papillomatosis must be ruled out as it may present similar findings ^1-3.

CASE STUDY

R.A, 10 years old, male, choked two months earlier while eating fish. His mother reported spontaneous improvement, however with onset of hoarseness. A few days later he began to wheeze and developed dysphonia. Systemic corticosteroids, mucolytic agents, and inhaler with bronchodilators were administered and led to partial reduction of wheezing.

Two months later recurrent dyspnea and elimination of blood clots led the mother to take him to see an otolaryngologist. Back then the patient was eupneic, acyanotic, and made no special effort while breathing. Flexible naso-laryngofibroscopy identified a FB in the anterior commissure. The patient underwent direct laryngoscopy under general anesthesia on the same day to remove the FB. On the following day a new exam showed reduced mobility in the patient’s right vocal cord and a small granuloma in the anterior commissure. He was kept on systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics. On day 13 significant improvement was found in the patient’s vocal patterns and absence of oropharyngeal complaints. Vocal cords were back to normal mobility and the granuloma in the anterior commissure persisted.

DISCUSSION

As mentioned before, FB in the larynx is more frequent in children. The foreign bodies themselves can be either organic or inorganic. In the case reported the patient choked on a fishbone fragment. Usually dysphonia, dyspnea, wheezing, snoring, strenuous and labored breathing occur in previously healthy children. The clinical history of the patient began with choking followed by persistent dysphonia and wheezing managed with bronchodilators that allowed for two months of partially improved symptoms ^3-5.

Yadair published a case of larynx FB in which the diagnosis was reached after four months into follow-up. Once the possibility of larynx FB is raised, the larynx must be thoroughly examined by direct or indirect laryngoscopy. Naso-fibrolaryngoscopy was performed right off the start, thus providing diagnostic confirmation ^5,6.

Most publications in the literature refer to FB removal under general anesthesia as the management of preference, using suspension laryngoscopy or bronchoscopy, as the foreign body may move onto inferior airways leading to asphyxia. The chosen approach was removal under general anesthesia through suspension laryngoscopy ⁵.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases such as this, one must be careful when using pre-defined diagnosis and should always look for information in the interview that may lead to proper case identification. As the foreign body’s presence in the larynx is confirmed, an expert assisted by a colleague skilled in handling the bronchoscope must remove it with the patient under general anesthesia.

REFERENCES

Paper submitted to the ABORL-CCF SGP (Management Publications System) on May 5th, 2005 and accepted for publication on June 6th, 2006. cod. 302.

Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo PUC-SP.

• ¹
  Alcântara P, Marcondes E, editores. Aspiração de Corpos Estranhos. In Pediatria Básica, 2 ed. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1968 p. 680-84.
• ²
  Baumgartner BJ, Peterson KL. A glottic wood chip presenting as chronic dysphonia: report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006 Jan;132(1):98-100.
• ³
  Midulla F, Guidi R, Barbato A, Capocaccia P, Forenza N, Marseglia G, Pifferi M, Moretti C, Bonci E, De Benedictis FM. Foreign body aspiration in children. Pediatr Int 2005 Dec;47(6):663-8.
• ⁴
  Marques MPC, Couto FD, Fim LA, Nogueira RB, Oliveira VS. Broncoscopia Rígida: A terapia do corpo estranho de vias aéreas. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 1997;63(6):551-6.
• ⁵
  Gandara MER, Pirana S, Delgatto PF, Naves JR, Silveira JAM, Minitti A. Corpo estranho de laringe: relato de caso. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia 1996;62:72-6.
• ⁶
  Yadair SPS, Goel HC, Munjal SK. Foreign body larynx - an usual mode of entry and presentation. Indian Pediatrics 1990;27:300-1.

Mailing address:

Giulliano Enrico Ruschi e Luchi

Av. Francisco Generoso da Fonseca 951 apto. 204 Jardim da Penha Vitória ES 29060-140.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  10 Aug 2007
• Date of issue
  June 2007

History

• Accepted
  06 June 2006
• Received
  05 May 2005