Inoculation with Azospirillum combined with nitrogen fertilization in sorghum intercropped with Urochloa in off-season ¹

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to evaluate the management of nitrogen fertilization in grains of sorghum inoculated or not with Azospirillum brasilense in single crop or intercropped with Urochloa brizantha (cv. Paiaguás) in the off-season. The experimental design was a completely randomized block design with four replications, in a 2 x 2 x 3 factorial scheme, with sorghum in single-cropped system or intercropped with grass; sorghum seeds inoculated or not with A. brasilense; and N management (application of 100% of the dose at sowing or only in topdressing or split - 30% at sowing and 70% in topdressing) at a dose of 120 kg ha^-1 N. Morphological components and sorghum grain yield and productivity of dry matter of the aerial part of the grass and the sorghum were evaluated. The splitting of nitrogen fertilization did not interfere in the yield of sorghum grain straw intercropped with U. brizantha. The intercropping with U. brizantha did not reduce sorghum grain yield. In dry climate conditions in the off-season, inoculation of sorghum seeds cv. Ranchero with A. brasilense increases grain yield.

Keywords:
dizatrophic bacteria; nitrogen; paiaguás grass; Sorghum bicolor

INTRODUCTION

The integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) are an alternative for sustainable intensification of land use (FAO, 2010) as they are based on diversified agricultural and livestock production in the same area: intercropped, sequential or rotated cultivation (Macedo, 2009; Crusciol et al., 2020).

In the Cerrado biome (Brazil), the intercropping of tropical Urochloa (Syn. Brachiaria) forage species with grain crops has stood out in the ICLS, whose objective is to produce grains and forage/or straw for the summer crop in the no-tillage system (NTS) (Ceccon et al., 2013; Maia et al., 2014). Sorghum growing has been evaluated for the inclusion in these systems as it is an excellent alternative for grain and forage production in situations where water deficit and poor soil fertility offers risk for the other cultivation of grass crops, such as corn, for example (Magalhães et al., 2014; Bogiani & Ferreira, 2017; Hadebe et al., 2017), which makes it necessary to evaluate the performance of the culture intercropped with Urochloa in the lowland Cerrado in the off-season (autumn-winter), due to the lack of available information.

Sorghum has two periods of intense nutrient uptake, the first is during the vegetative phase, when the plant has 7 to 12 expanded leaves, and the second, during grain formation (Coelho et al., 2002). In the first period, 20 to 30 days after the emergency, the plant begins a rapid growth, with an increase in the nutrient uptake rate from soil. Such behavior justifies this period as the ideal moment to perform topdressing nitrogen fertilization (Lourenção & Bagega, 2012).

The need and response potential of sorghum to nitrogen fertilization depends on the genotype and environmental factors, such as water availability and the content of organic matter in the soil (Mateus et al., 2011). Soil texture is also an important factor to consider, mainly in split-nitrogen fertilization, because it is directly associated with the potential of N losses due to leaching in soils (Tully & Ryals, 2017). In clay soils, this potential for losses may not be significant (Hallaq, 2010), which would explain total fertilization at sowing or in topdressing, according to preference or conditions of the farmer.

Therefore, to increase the competitiveness of sorghum in the market, its inclusion in the ICLS, associated with adequate management of fertilization can be added to the use of plant-growth promoting bacteria, such as those of the Azospirillum genus, aiming to optimize the yield of grains and straw with low economic and environmental cost because, besides the possibility of supplying part of the N via atmospheric fixation, this genus stimulates the synthesis of phytohormones that act positively on the effects of stresses on the plant (Bashan & Bashan, 2010; Cassán et al., 2014; Hungria et al., 2015).

However, it is necessary to evaluate whether the associated use of these practices can promote synergism or antagonism over each other, such as the negative effect of nitrogen fertilization on the efficiency of Azospirillum in grasses (Hungria, 2011; Repke et al., 2013), and the effect of competition among intercropped plant species (Mateus et al., 2016).

Thus, the hypotheses of this study are: inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in grain sorghum increases its grain yield; the splitting or not of nitrogen fertilization on sorghum under rainfed conditions does not interfere with grain yield in clayey soil; and the inter-row intercropping of grain sorghum with Paiaguás (Urochloa brizantha) does not interfere on sorghum grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate nitrogen fertilization management on the grass sorghum crop, inoculated or not with A. brasilense in the seeds, intercropped or not with Urochloa brizantha (cv. Paiaguás) in the NTS in the Cerrado in the off-season.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The experiments were conducted on the Teaching, Research and Extension Farm - Plant Production Sector at Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira, Selvíria, State of Mato Grosso do Sul (20^° 18’ S and 51^° 22’ W, 370 m above sea level), in the dry farming area over 2015 and 2016.

The soil of the area was classified as clay-textured dystrophic Red Latosol (Oxisol) (580 g kg^-1 clay), according to Santos et al. (2018). Before installation of the experiments, soil fertility was analyzed in the 0.00-0.20 m layer, according to Raij et al. (2001), and the results were as follows: 17 mg dm^-3 P (resin); 22 g dm^-3 O.M.; 5.5 pH (CaCl₂); 1.4 mmol_c dm^-3 K; 26.0 mmol_c dm^-3 Ca; 18.0 mmol_c dm^-3 Mg and 28.0 mmol_c dm^-3 H+Al; 44.9 and 73.1 mmol_c dm^-3 SB and CEC, respectively; 62% V and zero Aluminum. Fertilization was performed according to Cantarella et al. (1997) based on the chemical analyses and according to the need of the sorghum crop.

The climatic type of the region is Aw, according to the classification of Köppen. Some climatic information collected over the conduction of the experiments is shown in Figure 1.

The experiments were set in the off-season of each year (2015 and 2016), in an area with a record of five years under no-tillage system, where cotton was cropped until mid-2013, and remained fallow until the end of the 2014. Spontaneous vegetation were desiccated before the setting of the experiments using the herbicide Glyphosate (1.44 kg ha^-1 a.i.); after, the plant residues were ground using a horizontal shredder (Triton). After the first experiment, the area was cultivated with soybean in the summer in 2015 and the second experiment was set in succession in 2016.

The experimental design was a randomized complete block design in a 2 x 2 x 3 factorial scheme, with four replications, consisting of sorghum single cropped or intercropped with Urochloa brizantha, sorghum inoculated or not with Azospirillum brasilense and application of nitrogen only at sowing or only in topdressing or split - 30% at sowing and 70% in topdressing at the beginning of the panicle initiation stage - at 120 kg ha^-1 N, using urea as source applied between the rows of sorghum.

Sorghum was mechanically sown (March 17, 2015 and April 6, 2016) using sowing-fertilizer equipment with a rod-type furrow opener (hoe) mechanism for NTS, at approximately 0.03-m depth and with a density of 10 m^-1 seeds, rows spaced at 0.45 m, 6 m long. The sowing fertilization consisted of 90 kg P₂O₅ and 30 kg K₂O kg ha^-1, using simple superphosphate (18% P₂O₅) and potassium chloride (60% K₂O) as sources, respectively.

The experiments were composed of 48 plots with seven rows of sorghum. The hybrid Ranchero, with an aptitude for grain production was used. In the intercropping treatments, U. brizantha cv. BRS Paiaguás was used in both years. The diazotrophic bacteria were supplied by the AZO Total inoculant, developed for corn and wheat crops (registration number in MAPA: PR-93923-10074-1), physical nature: liquid, density: 1.0 g mL^-1; use dosage: 100 mL^-1 20 kg seeds (guarantee of 2 x 10⁸ colony forming units mL^-1 of A. brasilense, AbV5 and AbV6 strains). The inoculation of sorghum seeds was carried out about 30 minutes before sowing in the shade.

Grass was sown simultaneously with sorghum using another seed-fertilizer between the rows of sorghum, at the same spacing of 0.45 m, using approximately 10 kg ha^-1 of viable pure seeds (CV = 60%) of the U. brizantha. Grass seeds were sown at a 0.06-m depth, according to Kluthcouski et al. (2000), with the objective of delaying the emergence of grass in relation to sorghum.

Nitrogen topdressing fertilization was hand-performed approximately 10 cm from the sorghum plants, according to the treatments, approximately 30 days after emergence (DAE) (Cantarella et al., 1997), when the plants were about 0.30 m high (04/24/2015 and (05/13/2016), at the panicle initiation stage (growth stage 2 - GS2) (Magalhães et al., 2014).

The following were determined at harvest (06/18/2015 and 07/26/2016, approximately 90 and 110 DAE, respectively) in the sorghum crop: final stand of the plants, where the plants of the three central rows of the plot were counted, discarding 1.5 m from each end; the basal diameter of the stem; plant height and panicle length; the number of grains per panicle and the harvest index (ratio between dry mass of the grains and the dry mass of the entire plant). For these determinations, 10 plants were randomly collected in the useful area of the experimental plot. The mass of one thousand grains was determined by weighing four samples per plot and corrected for 13% moisture.

The material was collected for determination of grain yield, dry matter of sorghum and aerial part of the grass, carried out on the same day when sorghum was harvested, starting by the collection of the plants at the three central rows, discarding 1.5 m at each end, extrapolating it to one hectare. In the sorghum crop, the stem and leaf fractions were separated with pruning shears. Subsequently, this material was weighed and dried in an oven (65 ºC) to determine the dry matter. At sorghum harvesting, samples were taken to determine the dry matter yield of the aerial part of the grass in 1 m² (1.0 x 1.0-m metal square), in two samples per plot, adopting as cutting height close to the ground.

Data were submitted to the Shapiro-Wilk test to test normality and, due to climatic adversities and peculiar soil conditions, analysis of the data was carried out separately for each year, using the F test (p < 0.05) and the means compared by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) using SISVAR 5.3 computer software (Ferreira, 2008).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the two years of evaluation, the final plant stand of sorghum (FPS) was not influenced by the interactions betwen factors or by the isolated effects of any of the treatments (Tables 1). It should be emphasized the absence of interference from the U. brizantha on the plant stand (p > 0.05). The sowing of U. brizantha between the rows and in greater depth in relation to the sorghum seeds are crop strategies that minimize their competition with sorghum plants in the establishment phase (Kluthcouski et al., 2000; Silva et al., 2014), keeping the final stand approximate to that obtained in monoculture. Additionally, early cycle cultivars as Ranchero may decrease competition between species (Pariz et al., 2009; Crusciol et al., 2013). These results corroborate those obtained by Crusciol et al. (2011) and Mateus et al. (2011).

In 2015, the cropping modalities significantly influenced the basal stem diameter (BSD) and the management of nitrogen fertilization significantly influenced plant height (PH) (Table 1). Treatments with N application in topdressing provided higher plants, which was caused by the supply of N at the panicle initiation stage, when the plant begins a period of intense development (Lourenção & Bagega, 2012; Cavalcante et al., 2018).

However, it is emphasized that the split fertilization 30% - 70% highlighted with higher average PH and SBD, which may be attributed to the top dressing (70% N) as to 30% at sowing, possibly benefited the crop in the first year due to the adequate water regime after sowing (Figure 1).

Table 1: Averages
final plant stand (FPS), plant height (PH), panicle length (PL), stem basal diameter (SBD) of sorghum under nitrogen fertilization management, with and without inoculation in the seeds with A. brasilense and single cropped or intercropped with U. brizantha. Means and their respective standard error, 2015 and 2016⁽¹⁾

Treatments	2015
	FPS (plants ha-1)	PH(2) (m)	PL(2) (cm)	SBD (mm)
Inoculation	ns	**	**	ns
With	164.197±4.855	1.36±0.01	24.3±0.2	16±0.4
Without	177.002±4.444	1.35±0.02	24.3±0.2	16±0.3
Cropping Modalities	ns			**
Intercropped	166.794±4.893	1.35±0.02	24.4±0.2	17±0.3a
Single	174.405±4.656	1.36±0.01	24.2±0.2	16±0.3b
L.S.D.	13.573	0.028	0.56	0.77
Fertilization Management(3)	ns	**	ns	**
0 % - 100 %	173.181±5.758	1.39±0.01a	24.1±0.3	15±0.3b
30 % - 70 %	174.883±6.308	1.38±0.02a	24.5±0.3	16±0.3a
100 % - 0 %	163.734±5.483	1.29±0.01b	24.3±0.3	17±0.3a
L.S.D	20.057	0.042	0.83	1.13
C.V. (%)	14	4	4	8
Treatments	2016
	FPS (plants ha-1)	PH (m)	PL (cm)	SBD(2) (mm)
Inoculation	ns	ns	ns	*
With	174.328±5.141	1.27±0.01	26.2±0.2	17±0.2
Without	176.104±5.059	1.28±0.01	26.0±0.2	15±0.3
Cropping Modalities	ns	ns	ns
Intercropped	173.489±5.255	1.28±0.01	26.0±0.2	16±0.3
Single	176.943±4.921	1.27±0.01	26.1±0.2	16±0.2
L.S.D.	15.914	0.020	0.61	0.73
Fertilization Management(3)	ns	ns	ns	ns
0 % - 100 %	175.834±6.125	1.29±0.01	25.9±0.3	16±0.3
30 % - 70 %	176.280±6.710	1.27±0.01	26.5±0.3	17±0.3
100 % - 0 %	173.534±6.081	1.26±0.01	25.8±0.2	16±0.4
L.S.D.	23.517	0.031	0.91	1.08
C.V (%)	15	3	4	8

• ^*
  ¹⁾Different letters in the column differ from each other by the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05); ⁽²⁾Interaction between inoculation and cropping modalities factors; ⁽³⁾Sowing and in topdressing, respectively. * and ** significant at 5 and 1% probability, respectively; ^nsNon-significant; L.S.D. = Least Significant Difference; C.V. = Coefficient of Variation.

The lack of response in the second year, for the largest of the morphological characteristics of the plants (Table 1), suggests a residual effect of soybean cropping at the site over summer (2015/2016). Thus, the NTS record of the area is extremely important for the response of the crop to fertilization (Mateus et al., 2011; Borghi et al. 2014, Fontes et al., 2017).

As for the higher SBD in sorghum intercropped in 2015 (Table 1), it was probably a response to competition with grass, in which sorghum accumulates a greater amount of photoassimilates in the stem to excel in competition (Fernandes et al., 2014). Similar results were obtained by Crusciol et al. (2011) and Mateus et al. (2011), who observed a basal stem diameter of the sorghum intercropped with U. brizantha (cv. Marandu) and Panicum maximum (cv. mombasa) equal to or greater than that of the plants in single cropping.

A significant interaction (p < 0.05) was found in 2015 between inoculation and cropping modalities, for PH and panicle length (PL) (Table 2). The intercropped inoculated sorghum presented higher PH and PL than the single-cropped inoculated. The opposite occurred in sorghum without inoculation, where these variables were higher in sorghum in single crop. Evenly taller plants are likely to have higher panicle heights, which favors mechanical harvesting and results in a reduced percentage of panicles that are not harvested with the harvester-platform. Furthermore, a higher panicle height could be beneficial, as the sorghum yield is not reduced, the grass is not frequently mowed, and less time is required to close off the area to animals at the first grazing (Crusciol et al., 2012; Borghi et al., 2013).

Table 2:
Unfolding of the significant interactions between inoculation and cropping modalities for plant height (PH), panicle length (PL) (2015) and stem basal diameter (SBD) (2016) of sorghum under nitrogen fertilization management, with and without inoculation in the seed with A. brasilense and single cropped or intercropped with U. brizantha ⁽¹⁾. Means and their respective standard error

	Cropping Modalities
Inoculation	Intercropped	Single	L.S.D.
	PH (m)
With	1.38±0.02Aa	1.33±0.01Bb	0.04
Without	1.31±0.02Bb	1.38±0.02Aa
	PL (cm)
With	24.9±0.3Aa	23.7±0.2Bb	0.80
Without	23.8±0.3Bb	24.7±0.4Aa
	SBD (mm)
With	17±0.4Aa	16±0.3Aa	1.03
Without	15±0.4Bb	16±0.4Aa

• ^*
  ¹⁾Different upper-case letters in the column and different lowercase letters in the row differ from each other by the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). L.S.D. = Least Significant Difference.

This result evidences a synergism between A. brasilense and sorghum intercropped with U. brizantha. For inoculation within the cropping modalities, inoculated-intercropped sorghum presented higher PH and PL in comparison to the non-inoculated, whereas in single-cropped sorghum, these two variables were higher in the absence of inoculation (Table 2).

In 2016, single-cropped not-inoculated sorghum showed higher SBD when compared to intercropped sorghum without inoculation, while intercropped and inoculated sorghum showed the highest SBD in relation to the not-inoculated sorghum (Table 2). These results show a beneficial effect of inoculation on sorghum (Hungria, 2011; Nakao et al., 2018), because thicker stems allows greater water and nutrient translocation capacity (Mateus et al., 2011).

In the first year, the mass of one thousand grains (MTG) was lower in inoculated sorghum. On the other hand, the number of grains per panicle (NGP) was higher, demonstrating a relationship between the latter variable and grain yield, which has been reported in the literature (Mateus et al., 2011; Magalhães et al., 2014) (Table 3).

Table 3:
Average number of grains per panicle (NGP), mass of one thousand grains (MTG), aerial part dry matter yield (APDM), grain yield (GY), harvest index (HI) of sorghum under nitrogen fertilization management, with and without inoculation in the seeds with A. brasilense single cropped or intercropped with U. brizantha. Means and their respective standard error, 2015 and 2016⁽¹⁾

Treatments	2015
	NGP	MTG (g)	APDM (kg ha-1)	GY (kg ha-1)	HI
Inoculation	*	**	*	**	ns
With	1,397±42a	18.7±0.4b	6,888±220a	6,138±169a	0.47±0.01
Without	1,249±44b	20.2±0.3a	6,276±149b	5,313±132b	0.46±0.01
Cropping modalities	ns	ns	*	ns	ns
Intercropped	1,363±47	19.7±0.5	6,883±154a	5,928±192	0.46±0.01
Single	1,283±43	19.2±0.2	6,282±214b	5,523±143	0.47±0.01
L.S.D.	130	0.96	566	426	0,02
Fertilization Management(3)	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
0 % - 100 %	1,290±67	19.4±0.3	6,680±266	5,455±247	0.45±0.00
30 % - 70 %	1,298±57	19.8±0.6	6,625±229	5,987±191	0.47±0.01
100 % - 0 %	1,382±41	19.1±0.5	6,441±229	5,733±181	0.47±0.01
L.S.D.	192	1.41	837	630	0.03
C.V. (%)	17	8	15	13	7
Treatments	2016
	NGP	MTG(2) (g)	APDM (kg ha-1)	GY (kg ha-1)	HI(2)
Inoculation	*	*	ns	*	*
With	1,394±43a	18.9±0.3	6,314±278	5,868±193a	0.48±0.01
Without	1,265±40b	20.0±0.3	6,575±306	5,215±215b	0.45±0.01
Cropping modalities	ns		ns	ns
Intercropped	1,310±43	19.9±0.4	6,324±312	5,602±213	0.47±0.01
Single	1,349±45	19.0±0.3	6,566±272	5,481±218	0.46±0.01
L.S.D.	119.5	0.83	883	648	0.02
Fertilization Management(3)	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
0 % - 100 %	1,243±46	19.7±0.3	6,249±374	5,384±253	0.46±0.02
30 % - 70 %	1,352±52	19.7±0.5	6,481±379	5,704±201	0.47±0.01
100 % - 0 %	1,393±57	19.0±0.4	6,604±330	5,537±325	0.45±0.01
L.S.D.	176.6	1.23	1,305	958	0.04
C.V. (%)	15	7	23	20	9

• ^*
  ¹⁾Different letters in the columns are different from each other by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05); ⁽²⁾Interaction between inoculation and cropping modalities factors; ⁽³⁾Sowing and in topdressing, respectively; * and ** significant at 5 and 1% probability, respectively; ^nsNon-significant; L.S.D. = Least Significant Difference; C.V. = Coefficient of Variation.

Nevertheless, in the first year, the aerial part dry matter yield (APDM) (stem + leaves) was significantly higher in inoculated sorghum (10%). Under the same conditions of this study, Nakao et al. (2018) also obtained an increment in straw (25% of the stem + leaves) in Ranchero sorghum inoculated with A. brasilense.

Although APDM was positive in the first year, studies carried out in the Cerrado with other grass species inoculated by Azospirillum reported the achievement of increments higher than those observed in the present study, and indicated that the potential response of the inoculated species depends on the hybrid used (Quadros et al., 2014; Marini et al., 2015; Pereira et al., 2015). Quadros et al. (2014) evaluated three corn hybrids inoculated by Azospirillum, and observed a response to APDM in only one of the inoculated hybrids, with increase of 4.8 t ha^-1 (43%) of total dry matter of the aerial part (stem + leaves).

The inoculation incremented NGP and grain yield (GY) (Tables 3), presenting satisfactorys yield values for the condition of the study in both years (Freitas et al., 2014). The increase in the number of grains as a result of the inoculation with A. brasilense has also been reported in studies with other grass species, such as Chaves et al. (2016), which verified an increase by 35% in the number of spikelets per rice panicle inoculated with A. brasilense (AbV5 and AbV6 strains).

Inoculation incremented grain yield (GY) by 15.5 and 12.5%, in both years, respectively, in comparison to the treatment without inoculation. These increases are higher than those obtained by corn inoculated with A. brasilense, reported by Puente et al. (2009), of 11%, within the range reported by Lana et al. (2012), from 7 to 15%, and below the range reported by Hungria et al. (2010), from 24 to 30%, in comparison to the not inoculated.

Diazotrophic bacteria associated with grasses provides better soil exploitation and greater water and nutrient uptake by these species (Schultz et al., 2012). Thus, the higher grain yield of sorghum inoculated with A. brasilense allows a better ability of the plant in exploiting the soil by it is roots because its inoculation via seed results in an increase in the dry mass of the root system of plants (Andrade et al., 2019).

In addition, Assefa et al. (2010) report that the amount of water required during the sorghum cycle ranges from 450 to 650 mm, depending on the prevailing climatic conditions. Moreover, this study was conducted in dry farming conditions in the off-season, when there is a reduction in rainfall and the occurrence of high temperatures is common in the Cerrado. The rainfall accumulated over the crop cycles were 296 mm in 2015 and 364 mm in 2016 (Figures 1), poorly distributed over time and below the lower limit reported by the authors as mentioned above. However, despite these climatic inconveniences during the conduction of the experiments, crop grain yields were adequate for the season, according to Freitas et al. (2014).

Among the variables related to the yields of sorghum straw and grain, only APDM was significantly influenced by the cropping systems in 2015. In this year, the intercropped sorghum incremented APDM by approximately 10%, in comparison to the single crop (Table 3). This result is related to the higher SBD of intercropped sorghum (Table 1) because plants with thicker stems have a higher capacity for water translocation and accumulation of nutrients (Mateus et al., 2011).

In 2016, the interaction between inoculation and cropping modalities influenced the mass of one thousand grains (MTG) (Table 3). Intercropped-sorghum without inoculation presented the highest MTG, in relation to the single cropped, while intercropped-sorghum without inoculation presented higher MTG than the inoculated (Table 4).

Table 4:
Unfolding of the significant interactions between inoculation and cropping modalities, mass of one thousand grains (MTG) and harvest index (HI) of sorghum under nitrogen fertilization management with and without inoculation in the seeds with A. brasilense and single cropped or intercropped with U. brizantha. Means and their respective standard error, 2016⁽¹⁾

	Cropping modalities
Inoculation	Intercropped	Single	L.S.D.
	MTG (g)
With	18.87±0.4Ba	18.98±0.4Aa	1.17
Without	20.98±0.4Aa	19.07±0.5Ab
	HI
With	0.50±0.01Aa	0.47±0.01Ab	0.03
Without	0.44±0.02Ba	0.45±0.01Aa

• ^*
  ¹⁾Same uppercase letters in the same column and same lowercase letters in the row are not different from each other by the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). L.S.D. = Least Significant Difference.

Stress condition during growth stages 1 (from sowing to panicle initiation) and 2 (from panicle initiation to flowering) impaired the differentiation of panicle resulting in a reduction in the number of grains, which was compensated by the increase of its mass during growth stage 3 (from flowering to physiological maturation) (Magalhães et al., 2014). This behavior explains the higher MTG of inoculated sorghum as the lowest NGP was obtained in this treatment, which may have been caused by the stress of the plants under low water-availability conditions at a period of high demand by the crop (Sarig et al., 1988) due to the poorly distribution over the cycle (Figure 1).

In contrast, the lower MTG obtained in inoculated sorghum was caused by the higher NGP in this treatment, which may have promoted competition between these drains for photoassimilates at the filling stage. Therefore, based on what has been reported, the higher NGP in the inoculated plants is attributed to the greater ability of these plants to resist environmental stresses, as observed in other studies with inoculation with A. brasilense for it is hormonal effect on root growth (Schultz et al., 2012; Andrade et al., 2019).

In 2016, the harvest index (HI) was significantly influenced by the interaction between inoculation and cropping modalities. The intercropped-inoculated sorghum presented higher HI than the single-cropped. In the analysis of inoculation within cropping modalities, the intercropped-inoculated sorghum presented higher HI than the sorghum without inoculation (Table 4). Although plants with a higher MTG have higher HI (Menezes et al., 2015), the increase of the latter atribute in the inoculated sorghum resulted in compensation for the largest NGP.

No significant interactions were found between inoculation and nitrogen fertilization management for the dry matter yield of the aerial part of U. brizantha (ADMP). However, in 2015, ADMP was positively influenced by the intercropping with inoculated sorghum (Table 5).

Table 5:
Average aerial part dry matter yield (APDM) of U. brizantha grown intercropped with sorghum in nitrogen fertilization, inoculated or not in the seeds with A. brasilense. Means and their respective standard error, 2015 and 2016⁽¹⁾

	APDM (kg ha-1)
Treatments	2015	2016
Inoculation	*	ns
With	1,922±130a	1,440±81
Without	1,376±166b	1,306±80
L.S.D	399	241
Fertilization management (2)	ns	ns
0 % - 100 %	1,809±119	1,240±75
30 % - 70 %	1,696±272	1,435±104
100 % - 0 %	1,442±197	1,444±111
L.S.D.	596	361
Coefficient of Variation (%)	28	20

• ^*
  ¹⁾Different letters are not different from each other by the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05); ⁽²⁾Sowing and in topdressing, respectively. L.S.D. = Least Significant Difference.

This result can be attributed to the fact that in the first year, the experimental area was not used and in the second year, the experiment was set in succession to the soybean crop, that is, in a more adequate condition due to the residual effect of the legume cultivation. Thus, it is possible that less favorable soil conditions and better rainfall distribution in the first year (Figure 1) provided more favorable conditions for the response of the grass intercropped with inoculated sorghum. In this case, it is possible that the bacterium had migrated to the grass because, according to Hungria, (2011), Urochloa plants are hosts of this bacterium.

CONCLUSIONS

The total nitrogen fertilizer recommended and applied only at sowing or in topdressing or split (30% at sowing and 70% in topdressing) does not interfere in the yield of grain and straw of sorghum intercropped with U. brizantha (cv. Paiaguás).

In severe dry conditions in the off-season, the inoculation of sorghum seeds cv. Ranchero with Azospirillum brasilense increase grain yield by 14%.

The intercropping of grain sorghum with U. brizantha does not interfere in the sorghum grain yield.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND FULL DISCLOSURE

The authors thank CNPq for granting a scholarship to the first author, UNESP for allowing the use of experimental area, infrastructure and for providing the inputs and scientific support.

REFERENCES

• AndradeAFZozTZozAOliveira CESWittTW2019 Azospirillum brasilense inoculation methods in corn and sorghum. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 49:e53027
• AssefaYStaggenborgSAPrasadVPV2010 Grain Sorghum Water Requirement and Responses to Drought Stress: A Review. Crop Management, 9:1-11
• BashanYDe-BashanLE2010 How the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum/ promotes plant growth - a critical assessment. Advances in Agronomy, 108:77-136
• BogianiJCFerreiraQCB2017 Plantas de cobertura no sistema soja-milho-algodão no Cerrado. Piracicaba, International Plant Nutrition Institute. 15p
• BorghiECrusciolCACNascenteASSouzaVVMartinsPOMateusGPCostaC2013 Sorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time. European Journal of Agronomy, 51:130-139
• BorghiECrusciolCACTrivelinPCONascenteASCostaCiniroMateusGP2014 Nitrogen fertilization (15NH4NO3) of palisadegrass and residual effect on subsequent no-tillage corn. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 38:1457-1468
• CantarellaHRaijBVSawazakiE1997 Sorgo-granífero, forrageiro e vassou. In: Raij BV, Cantarella H, Quaggio JÁ & Furlani AMC (Eds.) Boletim Técnico 100: Recomendação de Adubação e Calagem para o Estado de São Paulo. Campinas, Instituto Agronômico. p. 66-67
• CassánFDVanderleydenJSpaepenS2014 Physiological and agronomical aspects of phytohormone production by model plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) belonging to the genus Azospirillum. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 33:440-459
• CavalcanteTJCastoldiGRodriguesCRNogueiraMMAlbertAM2018 Macro and micronutrients uptake in biomass sorghum. Pesquisa Agropecuário Tropical, 48:364-373
• CecconGBorghiECrusciolCAC2013 Modalidades e métodos de implantação do consórcio milho-braquiária. In: Ceccon G (Ed.) Consórcio Milho Braquiária. Brasília, Embrapa. p. 27-46
• ChavesJSMirandaAFMSantanaASRodríguezCASilvaES2016 Eficiência da inoculação na cultura do arroz (Oryza sativa L.) no sul do estado de Roraima. Revista Ambiente: Gestão e Desenvolvimento, 9:75-84
• CoelhoAMWaquilJMKaramDCaselaCRRibasPM2002 Seja doutor de seu sorgo. Sete Lagoas, Potafos. 24p
• CrusciolCACMateusGPMomessoLParizCmCastilhosAMCalonegoJCBorghiECostaCFranzluebbersAJCantarellaH2020 Nitrogen-fertilized systems of maize intercropped with tropical grasses for enhanced yields and estimated land use and meat production. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4:1-13
• CrusciolCACMateusGPNascenteASMartinsPOBorghiEParizCM2012 An innovative crop-forage intercrop system: early cycle soybean cultivars and palisade grass. Agronomy Journal, 104:1085-1095
• CrusciolCACMateusGPParizCMBorghiECostaCSilveiraJPF2011 Nutrição e produtividade de híbridos de sorgo granífero de ciclos contrastantes consorciados com capim-Marandu. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 46:1234-1240
• CrusciolCACNascenteASMateusGPBorghiELelesEPSantosNCB2013 Effect of intercropping on yields of corn with different relative maturities and palisadegrass. Agronomy Journal , 105:599-606
• FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization2010 An international consultation on integrated croplivestock systems for development: The way forward for sustainable production intensification. Integrated Crop Management. Rome, Food agriculture organization of the United Nations. Available at: < Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/images/iclsd/documents/crop_livestock_proceedings.pdf > Accessed on: March 18th, 2016.
  » http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/images/iclsd/documents/crop_livestock_proceedings.pdf
• FernandesPGMayACoelhoFCAbreuMCBertolinoKM2014 Influência do espaçamento e da população de plantas de sorgo sacarino em diferentes épocas semeadura. Ciência Rural, 44:975-981
• FerreiraDF2008 SISVAR: um programa para análises e ensino de estatística. Revista Científica Symposium, 6:36-41
• FontesGPTomlinsonPJRoozeboomKLDiazDAR2017 Grain sorghum response to nitrogen fertilizer following cover crops. Agronomy Journal , 109:2723-2737
• FreitasRSBorgesWLBTicelliM2014 Sorgo Granífero - Desempenho Agronômico de Cultivares. Pesquisa & Tecnologia, 11:1-6
• HadebeSTModiATMabhaudhT2017 Drought tolerance and water use of cereal crops: a focus on sorghum as a food security crop in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 203:177-191
• HallaqAHA2010 The impact of soil texture on nitrates leaching into groundwater in the north governorate, Gaza strip. Journal of the Social Sciences, 38:1-37
• HungriaM2011 Inoculação com Azospirillum brasilense: inovação em rendimento a baixo custo. Londrina, Embrapa Soja. 20p
• HungriaMCampoRJSouzaSEMPedrosaFO2010 Inoculation with selected strains of Azospirillum brasilense and A. lipoferum improves yields of maize and wheat in Brazil. Plant and Soil, 331:413-425
• HungriaMNogueiraMAAraujoRS2015 Soybean seed co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense: A new biotechnological tool to improve yield and sustainability. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6:811-817
• KluthcouskiJCobucciTAidarHYokoyamaLPOliveiraIPCostaJLSSilvaJGVilelaLBacellosAOMagnaboscoCU2000 Sistema Santa Fé: Tecnologia Embrapa: integração lavoura‑pecuaria pelo consórcio de culturas anuais com forrageiras, em áreas de lavoura, nos sistemas plantio direto e convencional. Santo Antonio de Goiás, Embrapa/Arroz e Feijão. 28p
• LanaMCDartoraJMariniDHannJEH2012 Inoculation with Azospirillum, associated with nitrogen fertilization in maize. Revista Ceres, 59:399-405
• LourençãoALFBagegaD2012 Tecnologias para a cultura do sorgo (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). InRoscoe R, Lourenção ALF, Grigolli JFJ, Melotto AM, Pitol C & Miranda RAS (Eds.) Tecnologia e produção: milho safrinha e culturas de inverno 2012. Campo Grande, Fundação MS. p. 138-144
• MacedoMCM2009 Integração lavoura e pecuária: o estado da arte e inovações tecnológicas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38:133-146
• MagalhãesPCSouzaTCMayALima FilhoOFSantosFCMoreiraJAALeiteCEPAlbuquerqueCJBFreitasRS2014 Exigências edafoclimáticas e fisiologia da produção. In: Borém A, Pimentel LD & Parrella RAC (Eds) Sorgo: do plantio à colheita. Viçosa, Universidade Federal de Viçosa. p. 58-88
• MaiaGACostaKAPSeverianoECEpifanioPSNetoJFRibeiroMGFernandesPBSilvaJFGGonçalvesWG2014 Yield and chemical composition of Brachiaria forage grasses in the offseason after corn harvest. American Journal of Plant Sciences . 5:33-941
• MariniDGuimarãesVFDartoraJLanaMCPinto JúniorAS2015 Crescimento e produtividade de híbridos de milho em resposta à associação com Azospirillum brasilense e fertilização com nitrogênio. Revista Ceres , 62:117-123
• MateusGPCrusciolCACBorghiEParizCMCostaCSilveiraJPF2011 Adubação nitrogenada de sorgo granífero consorciado com capim em sistema de plantio direto. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira , 46:1161-1169
• MateusGPCrusciolCACParizCMBorghiECostaCMartelloJMFranzluebbersAJCastilhosAM2016 Sidedress nitrogen application rates to sorghum intercropped with tropical perennial grasses. Agronomy Journal . 108:433-447
• MenezesCBSaldanhaDCCVSantosAndradeLCMingote JúlioMPPortugalAFTardinFD2015 Evaluation of grain yield in sorghum hybrids under water stress. Genetics and Molecular Research, 14:12675
• NakaoAHAndreottiMSoaresDAModestoVCDickmannL2018 Intercropping Urochloa brizantha and sorghum inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense for silage. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 49:501-511
• ParizCMAndreottiMTarsitanoMAABergamaschineAFBuzettiSChioderolliCA2009 Technical and economical performance of corn intercropped with Panicum and Brachiaria forage in crop-livestock integration system. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical , 39:360-370
• PereiraLMPereiraEMRevoltiLTMZingarettiSMMôroGV2015 Seed quality, chlorophyll content index and leaf nitrogen levels in maize inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. Revista Ciência Agronômica , 46:630-637
• PuenteMLGarciaJEAlejandroP2009 Effect of the bacterial concentration of Azospirillum brasiliense in the inoculum and its plant growth regulator compounds on crop yieldof corn (Zea mays L.) in field. World Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 5:604-608
• QuadrosPDRoeschLFWSilvaPRFVieiraVMRoehrsDDCamargoFAO2014 Desempenho agronômico a campo de híbridos de milho inoculados com Azospirillum. Revista Ceres , 61:209-218
• RaijBVAndradeJCCantarellaHQuaggioJA2001 Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais. Campinas, Instituto Agronômico . 284p
• RepkeRACruzSJSSilvaCJFigueiredoPGBicudoSJ2013 Eficiência da Azospirillum brasilense combinada com doses de nitrogênio no desenvolvimento de plantas de milho. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 12:214-226
• SantosHGJacominePKTAnjosLHCOliveiraVALumbrerasJFCoelhoMRAlmeidaJÁCunhaTJFOliveiraJB2018 Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Brasília, Embrapa . 353p
• SarigSBlumAOkonY1988 Improvement of the water status and yield of field-grown grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) by inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. Journal of Agricultural Science, 110:271-277
• SchultzNMoraisRFSilvaJÁBaptistaRBOliveiraRPLeiteJMPereiraWCarneiro JúniorJBAlvesBJRBaldaniJIBoddeyRMUrquiagaSReisVM2012 Avaliação agronômica de variedades de cana-de-acucar inoculadas com bactérias diazotróficas e adubadas com nitrogênio. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira , 47:261-268
• SilvaAGMoraesLEHorvathy NetoATeixeiraIRSimonGA2014 Consórcio sorgo e braquiária na entrelinha para produção de grãos, forragem e palhada na entressafra. Revista Ceres , 61:697-705
• TullyKRyalsR2017 Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems: Balancing food and environmental objectives. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 41:761-798

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  04 Apr 2022
• Date of issue
  Mar-Apr 2022

History

• Received
  04 June 2020
• Accepted
  31 Mar 2021