Perception of the environment and practice of physical activity by adults in a low socioeconomic area

Abstracts

OBJETIVO: Analisar a associação da prática de atividade física com a percepção do ambiente comunitário por adultos. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com 890 pessoas realizado no distrito de Ermelino Matarazzo em São Paulo, SP, 2007. As variáveis dependentes foram a prática de pelo menos 150 minutos por semana de atividade física no lazer e caminhada como forma de deslocamento. As variáveis independentes foram as de ambiente e as de ajuste foram sexo, idade, escolaridade e tempo de residência no domicílio. RESULTADOS: Apresentaram associação com a atividade física no lazer: ser convidado por amigos/vizinhos para a prática, a presença de clubes a menos de dez minutos das residências caminhando e a ausência de bares a menos de dez minutos das residências caminhando. A segurança geral foi associada com a caminhada como deslocamento. CONCLUSÕES: Para a promoção da atividade física em regiões de maior iniqüidade social é primordial o investimento em segurança pública e instalações para a prática, além da promoção de redes de apoio social.

Adulto; Atividade Motora; Atividades de Lazer; Fatores Socioeconômicos; Meio Ambiente e Saúde Pública; Estudos Transversais

OBJETIVO: Analizar la asociación de la práctica de actividad física con la percepción del ambiente comunitario por adultos. MÉTODOS: Se realizó estudio transversal con 890 personas en el distrito de Ermelino Matarazzo en Sao Paulo, Sureste de Brasil, 2007. Las variables dependientes fueron la práctica de por lo menos 150 minutos por semana de: actividad física como recreación y caminata como forma de traslado. Las variables independientes fueron las de ambiente y las de ajuste fueron sexo, edad, escolaridad y tiempo de residencia en el domicilio. RESULTADOS: Presentaron asociación con la actividad física como recreación: ser invitado por amigos/vecinos para la práctica, la presencia de clubes a menos de diez minutos caminando desde las residencias y la ausencia de bares a menos de diez minutos caminando desde las residencias. CONCLUSIONES: La seguridad general fue asociada con la caminata como traslado. Para la promoción de la actividad física en regiones de mayor inequidad social es primordial invertir en seguridad pública e instalaciones para la práctica, así como la promoción de redes de apoyo social.

Adulto; Actividad Motora; Actividades Recreativas; Factores Socioeconómicos; Medio Ambiente y Salud Pública; Estudios Transversales

ARTIGO ORIGINAL

Perception of the environment and practice of physical activity by adults in a low socioeconomic area

Alex Antonio Florindo^I; Emanuel Péricles Salvador^II; Rodrigo Siqueira Reis^III; Vanessa Valente Guimarães^I

^IEscola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades. Universidade de São Paulo (USP). São Paulo, SP, Brasil

^IIFaculdade de Saúde Pública. USP. São Paulo, SP, Brasil

^IIIUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR). Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. Curitiba, PR, Brasil

^{Correspondence}

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between practice of physical activity and the perception of the community environment among adults.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 890 adults carried out in Ermelino Matarazzo district in São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil, 2007. The dependent variables were the practice of at least 150 minutes per week in leisure time physical activity and walking for commuting. Independent variables concerned the environment, and adjustment variables were sex, age, education and length of time living in the neighborhood.

RESULTS: Variables associated with leisure time physical activity were: invitation from friends/neighbors, the presence of facilities less than ten minutes walking from the house and the absence of bars within ten minutes walking distance of the house. Public safety was associated with walking for commuting.

CONCLUSIONS: To promote physical activity in areas of low socioeconomic status, it is fundamental to invest in public safety and facilities for physical activity, in addition to promoting social support networks.

Descriptors: Adult. Motor Activity. Leisure Activities. Socioeconomic Factors. Environment and Public Health. Cross-Sectional Studies.

INTRODUCTION

The physical environment greatly influences the life style of people and their agency to chose healthy habits. The ecological model proposed by Sallis et al²⁰ showed that the practice of physical activity and the adoption of healthy diets are complex behaviors and that behavior change also depends on the characteristics of the environment. The model proposes levels of influence and interaction between respective aspects, perceptions of the environment and broader aspects such as neighborhood facilities and public policies.

Two reviews found an association between various environmental factors and different types of physical activity.^12,18 The positive association of access to adequate facilities and practice of leisure physical activity was also confirmed by studies that objectively analyzed the environment.^9,15 In addition, adequate access to recreational areas and open public spaces also increases the likelihood of walking at least 150 minutes per week.^5,6,7,11 Yet, these studies were undertaken in high-income countries and the associations described between environment and physical activity may not apply in the Brazilian context.

The large social inequity in Brazil and other middle-income countries should be considered because it involves the existence of areas with greater vulnerability that many times have few recreational areas, sidewalks or other community attributes that facilitate the practice of physical activity.

Currently, there is scarce evidence about the relationship between environment and physical activity among adult Brazilians, particularly for residents of low socioeconomic areas. Therefore the goal of this study was to analyze the association between physical activity and self-reported community environment among adult residents of a low socioeconomic area.

METHODS

This cross-sectional population study was performed in a district of São Paulo municipality, Southeastern Brazil.

The study was carried out in 2007, in Ermelino Matarazzo district, located in the eastern zone, which is the municipality's most populous region with more than 4 million residents and borders Guarulhos municipality. According to 2009 data from the State Data Analysis Foundation (Fundação SEADE), Ermelino Matarazzo has an area of 8.95 km², 143 census sectors and 115,571 residents, with a population density of approximately 12,900 residents/km².^a According to 2000 Census data from the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE - Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics), only 2.3% of the population of Ermelino Matarazzo has a monthly per capita income greater than 10 minimum salaries, in contrast to 12.1% of the population in São Paulo municipality.^b

The sample consisted of 890 people, aged 18 years or older, living at least six months in Ermelino Matarazzo. Sampling was performed through a three-stage cluster design: census sector selection (random selection of 35 sectors, distributed according to education of the household head), random selection of households from selected sectors and random selection of adults and older adults in the selected household.²³ More details on the sample design have been previously described.²²

The long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), validated in Brazil, was utilized to evaluate the practice of physical activity in leisure time and as a form of commuting. This instrument was used in epidemiological study with adult representative sample of São Paulo municipality.³ Comprehensive information about the validation studies and versions of the questionnaire are available on the internet.^c

To evaluate the environment we used an adapted version of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS — Brazilian version), validated by Malavasi et al.¹⁴ The scale was modified to improve understanding by adult residents of Ermelino Matarazzo. The final adapted version, consisting of 38 questions, was discussed with experts of the environment and physical activity in Brazil. The interclass correlation coefficient was > 0.70 for all scores developed from the individual questions.

The dependent variable was the practice of at least 150 minutes per week of walking as commuting or of moderate to vigorous leisure time physical activity. The duration of vigorous physical activities in leisure time was multiplied by two and added to moderate physical activity. The independent variables were all the dichotomous and categorical variables and the self-reported environmental score. The control variables were sex, education, age and length of time residing in household.

Poisson and two regression models were used to evaluate the effect of the independent variables on the practice of physical activity.

Initially, the chi-square was calculated for all environmental variables compared to each dependent variable. Variables with p values < 0.20 underwent bivariate analysis.⁸ For the multiple models, variables with p < 0.05 were used. Only variables that maintained significance after adjustment for the control variables were included in the final models. In case a dichotomous or categorical variable was included in the final model (for example, feeling safe at night or feeling safe during the day or overall safety score), each of these variables was tested with other environmental variables together with the control variables. We opted for the variable that remained significant after adjusting for the other environmental variables and the control variables.

For data analysis, the sample was weighted according to age group and the sample proportion from the census sector, estimated from the 2000 Census by IBGE.^b Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 15.0 and Stata version 9.1.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo (record number 1488 on 4/12/2006).

RESULTS

The majority of the sample was female, less than 60 years old and educated from zero to eight years (Table 1). These characteristics approximate the population of São Paulo municipality.

In the sample, people were more active in commuting in comparison to leisure time physical activity (Table 2), which may be associated with the low socioeconomic level of the area.

The variables that obtained p values < 0.20 for the practice of at least 150 minutes of leisure physical activity were: amount of recreational areas, clubs, sport courts, social support through invitations from friends and good perception of public safety (Table 3). For walking as commuting, good perception of public safety and safety in commuting were important (Table 4).

After adjustment, the variables associated with leisure physical activity were: invitation from friends/neighbors, proximity of clubs near homes and long distance of bars from homes (Table 5).

In regards to walking as commuting, after adjustment, overall public safety was the only variable associated with this type of physical activity (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

This study found that people with a good perception of safety were more likely to be active in commuting. The score for this perception consisted of safety in walking, good street lighting at night of streets around the residence and bicycle riding or physical activity during the day or physical activity at night.

The results were similar to other studies performed in high-income countries.^5,6,10 Giles-Corti & Donovan,⁶ in a study with 1,803 Australian adults found that the perception of safe places for walking was associated to the practice of at least 30 minutes per day of walking in commuting (OR = 1.49; 95%CI: 1.14;1.95) or of any type of walking (OR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.08;2.09). Similar findings were identified in English female adults. Self-reported bad safety was associated with reduced likelihood of any type of walking (OR = 0.53; 95%CI: 0.31;0.88).⁵

A study with 861 adults in three cities of the United States found that after six months of follow up, women reporting low crime index in their neighborhood practiced more minutes of physical activity per week in comparison to other women.²¹

Good self-perception of safety may be associated with the improvement and maintenance of neighborhood facilities. Wood et al²⁴ argued that adequate maintenance of neighborhoods allows for improved social networks and improved social control, contributing to increased sense of safety among residents.

These results highlight that to promote physical activity it is important to invest in public safety and violence prevention.

The prevalence identified in this study for active people in leisure time was similar to a recent national survey of adults in all the Brazilian capitals.⁴ Additionally, the results of this study showed that people invited to practice physical activity are more likely to be active in leisure.

A similar finding was reported in a cross-sectional study of adults (n = 2,205) in the United States,⁷ where people with a partner for practicing had increased likelihood of meeting physical activity recommendations (OR = 1.47; 95%CI: 1.15;1.89).

Giles-Corti & Donovan⁶ showed that the perception of social support in the neighborhood for walking with a partner was associated with walking for leisure (OR = 1.80; 95%CI: 1.36;2.40) and with walking in general (OR = 1.52: 95%CI: 1.09;2.11). One of the first cross-sectional surveys performed with European adults in Belgium, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain, found that people with low scores for social support were more likely to be inactive in leisure (OR = 2.15; 95%CI: 1.72;2.68).²³

Evidence from high-income countries indicates that social support is very important for the practice of physical activity. The results from this study support the above hypothesis and reinforce the importance of investing in environments that stimulate people's surroundings to encourage the creation of social networks important to the practice of physical activity.

Proximity between clubs and the home was positively associated with leisure physical activity. Nonetheless, the presence of bars was inversely associated with practice. Other studies were not identified to support the finding that bars close to homes are inversely associated with the practice of leisure physical activity.

Although bars are important places for social interaction, patrons may have unhealthy habits such as excessive alcohol consumption, tobacco use and consumption of high energy density food with low nutritional value. In addition, the chance of serious violence acts is higher in these locations, especially in the periphery of São Paulo city, and it is possible that proximity to these establishments is related to degraded environments.

In regards to clubs, it is well established in high-income countries that the presence of leisure and recreation facilities is positively associated with the practice of leisure physical activity.^{2,6,9,13,15,19} Clubs were the only specific recreational facilities associated to leisure physical activity in this study. In Ermelino Matarazzo district there were eight facilities in 2007, all public. This finding is even more relevant when considering other issues such as the formation of social networks, in which clubs play an important role.

In Brazil, analysis of data from more than 54 thousand adults interviewed by the Vigitel System showed that the existence of adequate locations close to residences was associated with the practice of at least 150 minutes per week of leisure physical activity.⁴

Adequate access to recreational areas and open public spaces is not only associated with leisure physical activity but also increases the likelihood of walking at least 150 minutes.^5,6,7,11

These data show the importance of leisure and recreational areas in urban planning, since these facilities contribute to leisure physical activity and also walking as commuting.

As limitation, cross-sectional studies are unable to establish causality. The evaluation of self-reported environment in relation to practice of physical activity may suffer from this problem, since without temporality it is not possible to establish if an adequate environment is the cause of physical activity. In addition, the perception of environment relies on current knowledge of the neighborhood. This limitation may have been minimized since the analysis considered length of time living in the current home.

Another problem that may have influenced the results is related to the notion of proximity. It was defined as locations people could reach within ten minutes walking from their home, equal to approximately 800 meters. Distances from 400 meters to 1,500 meters (from five to 15 minutes walking) are significantly associated with the practice of walking for commuting.¹⁶ Nonetheless, it is not known if the people interviewed share this notion of time and distance.

A modified scale, based on the NEWS version validated in Brazil, was used to establish data validity and the true relationship with the contextual data of the environment.¹⁴ Although the contextual indicators are associated and follow the same direction of relationship as indicators previously found to be related to physical activity,¹⁷ a recent study found low agreement between objectively measured data and self-reported data.¹ Therefore, it is possible that the objective and perceived variables capture different aspects of the environment, which would explain the low agreement.

In summary, these results show that the practice of physical activity is a complex phenomenon, requiring interdisciplinary strategies for understanding and promotion, which can be found in the 2006 National Policy for Health Promotion.

REFERENCES

Received: 4/22/2010

Approved: 8/25/2010

Article based on associate professor thesis of Florindo AA, presented to Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades da Universidade de São Paulo, in 2009.

Research supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Process nº 2006/57810-0) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Processo nº 402042/2005-0).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

• 1. Ball K, Jeffery RW, Crawford DA, Roberts RJ, Salmon J, Timperio AF. Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. Prev Med 2008;47(3):294-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001
• 2. Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Clavisi O, Leslie E. Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Prev Med 2000;31(1):15-22. DOI:10.1006/pmed.2000.0661
• 3. Florindo AA, Guimarães VV, Cesar CL, Barros MB, Alves MC, Goldbaum M. Epidemiology of leisure, transportation, occupational, and household physical activity: prevalence and associated factors. J Phys Act Health 2009;6(5):625-32.
• 4. Florindo AA, Hallal PC, Moura EC, Malta DC. Practice of physical activities and associated factors in adults, Brazil, 2006. Rev Saude Publica 2009;43(Suppl 2):65-73. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102009000900009
• 5. Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M. Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58(11):924-8. DOI:10.1136/jech.2003.014068
• 6. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Prev Med 2002;35(6):601-11. DOI:10.1006/pmed.2002.1115
• 7. Granner ML, Sharpe PA, Hutto B, Wilcox S, Addy CL. Perceived individual, social, and environmental factors for physical activity and walking. J Phys Act Health 2007;4(3):278-93.
• 8. Hocking RR. The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics 1976;32(1):1-49.
• 9. Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC. Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):105-16. DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023
• 10. Hooker SP, Wilson DK, Griffin SF, Ainsworth BE. Perceptions of environmental supports for physical activity in African American and white adults in a rural county in South Carolina. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2(4):A11.
• 11. Humpel N, Owen N, Iverson D, Leslie E, Bauman A. Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. Am J Prev Med 2004;26(2):119-25. DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.005
• 12. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(3):188-99.
• 13. Huston SL, Evenson KR, Bors P, Gizlice Z. Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population. Am J Health Promot 2003;18(1):58-69.
• 14. Malavasi LM, Duarte MFS, Both J, Reis RS. Escala de mobilidade ativa no ambiente comunitário - News Brasil: retradução e reprodutibilidade. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum 2007;9(4):339-50.
• 15. McCormack GR, Giles-Corti B, Bulsara M. Correlates of using neighborhood recreational destinations in physically active respondents. J Phys Act Health 2007;4(1):39-53.
• 16. McCormack GR, Giles-Corti B, Bulsara M. The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors. Prev Med 2008;46(1):33-40. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.01.013
• 17. McGinn AP, Evenson KR, Herring AH, Huston SL, Rodriguez DA. The association of perceived and objectively measured crime with physical activity: a cross-sectional analysis. J Phys Act Health 2008;5(1):117-31.
• 18. Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Understanding environmental influences on walking; review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 2004;27(1):67-76. DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006
• 19. Rutten A, Abel T, Kannas L, von Lengerke T, Luschen G, Diaz JA, et al. Self reported physical activity, public health, and perceived environment: results from a comparative European study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55(2):139-46. DOI:10.1136/jech.55.2.139
• 20. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297-322. DOI:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100
• 21. Sallis JF, King AC, Sirard JR, Albright CL. Perceived environmental predictors of physical activity over 6 months in adults: activity counseling trial. Health Psychol 2007;26(6):701-9. DOI:10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.701
• 22. Salvador EP, Florindo AA, Reis RS, Costa EF. Perception of the environment and leisure-time physical activity in the elderly. Rev Saude Publica 2009;43(6):972-80. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102009005000082
• 23. Stähl T, Rütten A, Nutbeam D, Bauman A, Kannas L, Abel T, et al. The importance of the social environment for physically active lifestyle: results from an international study. Soc Sci Med 2001;52(1):1-10. DOI:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00116-7
• 24. Wood L, Shannon T, Bulsara M, Pikora T, McCormack G, Giles-Corti B. The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: an exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents' perceptions of safety. Health Place 2008;14(1):15-31. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.04.004

a

Fundação Seade. Informações dos Distritos da Capital. [internet]. [cited 20 Dec 2010 ] Available:

http://www.seade.gov.br/produtos/distritos/imp.php?page=consulta&action=var_list&busca=Densidade+Demogr%E1fica

b

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico 2000. Rio de Janeiro; 2000.

c

International Physical Activity Questionnaire. [internet] [cited 20 Dec 2010]. Available:

http://www.ipaq.ki.se/ipaq.htm

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  04 Mar 2011
• Date of issue
  Apr 2011

History

• Received
  22 Apr 2010
• Accepted
  25 Aug 2010