SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.50Severity of malocclusion in adolescents: populational-based study in the north of Minas Gerais, BrazilLife expectancy without depression increases among Brazilian older adults author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links


Revista de Saúde Pública

Print version ISSN 0034-8910On-line version ISSN 1518-8787

Rev. Saúde Pública vol.50  São Paulo  2016  Epub May 03, 2016 

Original Articles

Health self-assessment by hemodialysis patients in the Brazilian Unified Health System

Tiago Ricardo MoreiraI 

Luana GiattiII 

Cibele Comini CesarIII 

Eli Iola Gurgel AndradeIV 

Francisco de Assis AcurcioV 

Mariângela Leal CherchigliaIV 

IDepartamento de Medicina e Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Viçosa. Viçosa, MG, Brasil

IIDepartamento de Nutrição Clínica e Social. Escola de Nutrição. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil

IIIDepartamento de Estatística. Instituto de Ciências Exatas. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

IVDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

VDepartamento de Farmácia Social. Faculdade de Farmácia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil



To examine whether the level of complexity of the services structure and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients in hemodialysis are associated with the prevalence of poor health self-assessment.


In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated 1,621 patients with chronic terminal kidney disease on hemodialysis accompanied in 81 dialysis services in the Brazilian Unified Health System in 2007. Sampling was performed by conglomerate in two stages and a structured questionnaire was applied to participants. Multilevel multiple logistic regression was used for data analysis.


The prevalence of poor health self-assessment was of 54.5%, and in multivariable analysis it was associated with the following variables: increasing age (OR = 1.02; 95%CI 1.01–1.02), separated or divorced marital status (OR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.34–0.88), having 12 years or more of study (OR = 0.51; 95%CI 0.37–0.71), spending more than 60 minutes in commuting between home and the dialysis service (OR = 1.80; 95%CI 1.29–2.51), having three or more self-referred diseases (OR = 2.20; 95%CI 1.33–3.62), and reporting some (OR = 2.17; 95%CI 1.66–2.84) or a lot of (OR = 2.74; 95%CI 2.04–3.68) trouble falling asleep. Individuals in treatment in dialysis services with the highest level of complexity in the structure presented less chance of performing a self-assessment of their health as bad (OR = 0.59; 95%CI 0.42–0.84).


We showed poor health self-assessment is associated with age, years of formal education, marital status, home commuting time to the dialysis service, number of self-referred diseases, report of trouble sleeping, and also with the level of complexity of the structure of health services. Acknowledging these factors can contribute to the development of strategies to improve the health of patients in hemodialysis in the Brazilian Unified Health System.

Key words: Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, psychology; Renal Dialysis; Self-Assessment; Sickness Impact Profile; Attitude to Health; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care); Unified Health System; Cross-Sectional Studies


Health self-assessment is a comprehensive and solid subjective measure of health, besides being considered a strong predictor of disability9, usage of health services14, and mortality7. The context in which the individual lives can influence the health self-assessment, which, in turn, can aggregate and summarize the biological, psychosocial, and social dimensions of health5.

Among the factors associated with the worse health self-assessment are sociodemographic characteristics, such as female gender4, advanced age4,19, and lower levels of education3,4 and income3, as well as unhealthy behaviors5, presence of objective health conditions19, functional incapacity3,4,20, and psychosocial aspects, such as social isolation5. The presence of chronic diseases directly influences health self-assessment, and the presence of bad self-assessment grows as the number of referred diseases increases4.

Few studies have assessed the association between health self-assessment and chronic kidney disease21,25. Chronic kidney disease is a public health problem characterized by high morbidity and mortality, impacting economic, social, and personal aspects, as well as the health system. Patients with chronic kidney disease who develop end-stage renal disease require dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) for the rest of their lives or require kidney transplant, carried out in specific health services21. The quality and the performance of the dialysis services are fundamental to maintaining the best clinical condition of the patients27. The characteristics of dialysis services influence the quality of life of patients in treatment2 and its results, as the reduction in the rate of urea after the hemodialysis session23, the control of anemia8 and the survival time6.

Studies have also shown that the prevalence of poor health self-assessment in hemodialysis patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease is high when compared to the prevalence observed in the total population21,25. In that case, similarities with the prevalence found in patients with other chronic diseases, such as coronary heart disease and cancer are pointed out25. This study aimed to assess whether the level of complexity of the structure of services and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients in hemodialysis are associated with the prevalence of poor health self-assessment.


In this cross-sectional study, survey data were used by the Project TRS – Epidemiological and Economic Evaluation of Substitute Renal Therapy Modalities in Brazil, led by the Research Group in Health Economics at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais in 2007.

The TRS project participants were recruited in dialysis units (n = 81) and transplant centers (n = 17) registered at the Brazilian Society of Nephrology. The criteria for inclusion of participants were: being over 18 years old, being diagnosed with late-stage chronic kidney disease and being in dialysis for at least three months, or having performed a kidney transplant at least six months before. Patients who did multiple transplants were excluded.

A representative sample was obtained at the services of dialysis and transplant centers contracted with the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Sampling by conglomerate was used in two stages: in the first one, dialysis services and transplant centers were sampled; in the second, patients in treatment at dialysis centers and transplant services sampled in the first stage were selected. The random selection of patients was made using the records of patients of dialysis services and transplant centers. We selected 3,036 patients, of which 1,621 were in hemodialysis, 788 in peritoneal dialysis, and 627 who had performed kidney transplant. Each sample is representative of the respective treatment modality.

Data collection was carried out from January to May 2007. Trained interviewers applied a previously tested structured questionnaire containing socioeconomic, demographic, clinical, and quality of life questions. The patients were given a copy of the questionnaire to follow during the implementation of the interview. Only patients who were undergoing hemodialysis treatment were assessed, which corresponded to 1,621 individuals allocated in 81 dialysis services in the Country. The average number of patients by dialysis service was of 20 (minimum of 13 and a maximum of 31 patients).

Dialysis services data analyzed were obtained in the National Registry of Health Establishments (CNES)a, made available through DATASUS, Ministry of Health. The data obtained concern the same period of data collection from patients.

The dependent variable was the health self-assessment. The answers to the question “how would you say your health is in general?” were categorized as “good” (which included individuals who answered excellent, very good or good), and “bad” (which included respondents who answered regular or bad).

Explanatory variables were included to the individual (level 1) and dialysis services (level 2). The sociodemographic characteristics investigated were: sex, age (continuous and grouped into age groups), color or race, full years of education, marital status, and commuting time between home and the dialysis service. The clinical characteristics were: time on dialysis, number of self-referred diseases (constructed from the responses to the questions that investigated medical diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes, cancer, depression, pulmonary disease, cirrhosis, arthritis, HIV, bone disease, stroke, ulcers, and hepatitis), inscription on the transplant list, trouble sleeping, extra medical consultation (out of the dialysis service) in the last 12 months, and hospitalization in the last 12 months.

Contextual characteristics related to dialysis service were: type of service (outpatient; inpatient), educational activity (yes; no), number of hemodialysis machines (2-20; 21-30; 31 or more), working shifts (morning and afternoon; morning, afternoon, and night; 24-hour), existence of transplant service in the unit (yes; no), existence of vascular surgery service (yes; no), and dialysis treatments offered (hemodialysis; hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis). These variables were grouped into an indicator that characterized the level of complexity of dialysis service structure through the analysis of the main component (AMC) from the polychoric matrix correlationb. This analysis reduced the number of variables assessed, generating a new set of p components, with the first component being the one that presents the greatest variance possible among all possible linear combinations of the original variables. The extracted component is a continuous variable categorized according to tertiles, defining the level of complexity of the dialysis services in high, medium, and low. The component obtained explained 72.0% of the total variance of the seven variables used in characterizing the structure of the dialysis services.

The initial analysis included description of study population by means of frequency distribution, mean, and standard deviation. The prevalence of poor health self-assessment was estimated, and its association with characteristics of the individual and the service was investigated using Pearson’s Chi-square test with a significance level of 5%. The strength of the association between health and self-assessment explanatory variables was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals using bivariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regression.

Mean odds ratio (MOR) was used to estimate the contextual effect. MOR quantifies the variation among the dialysis services, comparing two people with the same covariables in two services picked randomly13. MOR is the median chances ratio between the individual that is more likely and the one that is less likely to report poor health self-assessment. As MOR quantifies the variance of the contextual level in the odds ratio, it is comparable to the fixed effects odds ratio. Thus, MOR measures heterogeneity in scale familiar to researchers who worked with the logistics regression model13.

The association between each variable of level 1 and the self-perception of health was tested (bivariate analysis). The following multilevel modeling was started with the setting of a null model (without explanatory variables) to verify the significance of variance of the poor health self-assessment among dialysis services (model I). The subsequent model (model II) was adjusted with the inclusion of explanatory variables of individual level that presented value of p < 0.20 in bivariate analysis. The ones with p-value < 0.05 were kept. The final model (model III) included the contextual level variable, complexity of dialysis service structure to the previous model, with the variables that showed statistical significance at the level of 5% remaining.

We used Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and likelihood ratio test to compare the models. The Stata software version 11.0 was used for statistical analysis.

The TRS Project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Opinion ETIC 397-04). All participants signed an informed consent form.


Of the 1,621 participants, more than half were male, married, and with up to seven years of study. The average age was 48.9 years old (SD = 14.5) and approximately 76.0% were less than 59 years old. More than a third was white or yellow and about 33.0% reported spending less than 20 minutes on the way home to the dialysis service. Other features of interest are found in Table 1.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics, clinics and dialysis services to patients on hemodialysis. Brazil, 2007. 

Variable n %
Health Self-assessment
Good 738 45.5
Poor 883 54.5
Sociodemographic features
Female 707 43.6
Male 914 56.4
Age group (years old)
18-39 446 27.5
40-59 781 48.2
60 or more 394 24.3
Color or race
White and yellow 671 41.9
Black 230 14.3
Brown 588 36.7
Others 114 7.1
Marital status
Married 921 56.8
Single 385 23.8
Separated/Divorced 182 11.2
Widower 130 8.0
No information 3 0.2
Completed education in years
0-3 337 20.8
4-7 567 35.0
8-11 248 15.3
12 or more 465 28.7
No information 4 0.2
Time spent between home and the dialysis service
< 20 min 543 33.5
20-40 min 464 28.6
41-60 min 313 19.3
> 60 min 301 18.6
Clinical features
Time in dialysis
< 6 months 141 10.3
7-12 months 192 14.0
13-24 months 283 20.7
< 24 months 752 55.0
Registry in the transplant waiting list
Yes 903 55.7
No 656 40.5
Additional medical consultation
No 740 45.7
Yes 880 54.3
No information 1 0.1
Hospitalization in the last 12 months
No 869 53.6
Yes 747 46.1
No information 5 0.3
Trouble falling asleep
None or a little amount of time 856 52.8
Some or a good amount of time 401 24.7
Most of the time 364 22.5
Self-referred diseases
None 100 6.2
One 541 33.4
Two 492 30.4
Three or more 455 28.1
No information 33 2.0
Characteristics of the dialysis services
Complexity level of the dialysis service structure
Low 553 34.1
Average 535 33.0
High 533 32.9

Total 1,621 100

Among the participants, 54.5% reported poor health self-assessment (Table 1). In bivariate analysis, the chance of poor health self-assessment increased with age, and was highest among those who spent more than 60 min on the way home to the dialysis service than those who spent less than 20 min. The prevalence was lowest among single, separated, and divorced patients than married ones, and lowest among those who studied eight years or more compared to those who reported up to three years of study. With the exception of time on dialysis treatment, all clinical characteristics were associated with poor health self-assessment (p < 0.05). In addition, the chance of poor health self-assessment was lower in patients attended in services of high complexity level (OR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.53–0.86) (Table 2).

Table 2 Gross and adjusted analysis of multilevel logistic regression for factors associated with poor health self-assessment of hemodialysis patients. Brazil, 2007. 

Individual-level variables Gross analysis Adjusted analysis

OR 95%CI Model I Model II Model III

OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
Sociodemographic features
Female 1 - - - - - -
Male 1.01 0.82–1.23 - - - - -
Age 1.02 1.01–1.03* - 1.02 1.01–1.02* 1.02 1.01–1.02*
Color or race
White and yellow 1 - - - - - -
Black 1.11 0.81–1.52 - - - - -
Brown 1.22 0.97–1.55 - - - - -
Others 1.20 0.79–1.82 - - - - -
Marital status
Married 1 - 1 1
Single 0.78 0.60–0.99* - 1.15 0.86–1.54 1.14 0.86–1.53
Separated/Divorced 0.68 0.49–0.95* - 0.63 0.44–0.89* 0.62 0.43–0.88*
Widower 1.22 0.83–1.79 - 0.89 0.57–1.38 0.90 0.58–1.38
Completed education in years
0-3 1 - - 1 1 -
4-7 0.86 0.65–1.15 - 0.96 0.70–1.31 0.96 0.71–1.31
8-11 0.69 0.49–0.97* - 0.80 0.54–1.17 0.80 0.55–1.17
12 or more 0.44 0.32–0.59* - 0.51 0.36–0.71* 0.51 0.37–0.71*
Time spent between home and the dialysis service
< 20 min 1 - - 1 - 1 -
20-40 min 1.13 0.87–1.48 - 1.05 0.79–1.39 1.06 0.80–1.40
41-60 min 1.22 0.91–1.63 - 1.14 0.83–1.57 1.17 0.85–1.60
> 60 min 1.83 1.35–2.48* - 1.74 1.25–2.43* 1.80 1.29–2.51*
Clinical features
Time in dialysis
< 6 months 1 - - - - -
7-12 months 0.86 0.55–1.35 - - - - -
13-24 months 0.88 0.58–1.35 - - - - -
> 24 months 0.87 0.59–1.27 - - - - -
Registry in the transplant waiting list
Yes 1 - - - - - -
No 1.33 1.07–1.65* - - - - -
Additional medical consultation
No 1 - 1 - 1 -
Yes 1.36 1.11–1.67* - 1.27 1.01–1.60* 1.24 0.99–1.57
Hospitalization in the last 12 months
No 1 - - 1 - 1 -
Yes 1.41 1.15–1.74* - 1.24 0.99–1.55 1.25 1.00–1.57
Trouble falling asleep
None or a little amount of time 1 - - 1 - 1 -
Some or a good amount of time 2.31 1.79–2.98* - 2.16 1.65–2.83* 2.17 1.66–2.84*
Most of the time 3.25 2.47–4.28* - 2.68 2.00–3.61* 2.74 2.04–3.68*
Self-referred diseases
None 1 - - 1 - 1 -
One 1.36 0.86–2.13 - 1.33 0.83–2.15 1.28 0.80–2.07
Two 1.88 1.19–2.98* - 1.55 0.95–2.53 1.47 0.90–2.39
Three or more 3.08 1.92–4.91* - 2.33 1.41–3.84* 2.20 1.33–3.62*
Context-level variable
Level of complexity of the dialysis service structure
Low 1 - - - - 1 -
Average 1.01 0.73–1.37 - - - 0.94 0.69–1.33
High 0.67 0.49–0.91* - - - 0.59 0.42–0.84*
Measuring the variation among services
σ2 (EP) - - 0.411 (0.076) 0.479 (0.081) 0.412 (0.083)
PVC - - - 16.7% -14.0%
MOR - - 1.48 1.58 1.48
Evaluation of the Models - -
Log likelihood - - -1108.966 -986.0015 -981.0539
Test LR - - - < 0.001 0.007
AIC - - 2221.931 2010.003 2004.108

OR: odds ratio; σ2: variance in the context level; EP: standard error; PCV: proportional variance change; MOR: median odds ratio; LR test: likelihood ratio test; AIC: Akaike information criterion

* p < 0.05.

The adjusted multilevel analysis is presented in Table 2. Model I presents a statistically significant variance in self-assessment of poor health among dialysis services (σ2 = 0.411; 95%CI 0.285–0.591). MOR was equal to 1.48, indicating that differences between dialysis services may increase in 48.0% the odds of poor health self-assessment. For instance, if the patient can transfer to a dialysis service with more inadequate service conditions, the risk of self-evaluating his health as bad could increase, being the median of such increase equal to 48.0%.

In model II, the following individual variables remained independently associated with increased chance of poor health self-assessment: being older, spending 60 minutes or more on the way home to the dialysis service, having three or more of the diseases referred, and having trouble sleeping. Separated or divorced marital status, and having 12 years or more of study were associated with less chance of poor health self-assessment.

As to the contextual level (level 2), the chance to assess health as poor was lower among those who were under treatment in dialysis services with the highest level of complexity (OR = 0.59; 95%CI 0.42-0.84) (model III). The inclusion of context variable did not cause major changes in the magnitude of the association between poor health self-assessment and individual variables. Only the variable “extra medical consultation” (out of dialysis service) lost its significance. The variance of poor health self-assessment among dialysis services was reduced from 0.479 (model II) to 0.412 (model III) after the inclusion of the context variable, indicating that the variation of 14.0% of poor health self-assessment in the contextual level might be explained by the inclusion of the level of complexity of the dialysis service structure in the model. A reduction of AIC between models II and III occurred, and the likelihood ratio test showed to be significant (p < 0.05), indicating better adaptation of model III.


The results of this study show that more than half of the patients in hemodialysis assessed their health as poor. Patients who presented a higher chance to assess their health negatively were the older, less-educated ones, who spent more time on the way home to the dialysis service, which reported the largest number of self-referred diseases, and difficulty sleeping. Separated or divorced patients had less chance of poor health self-assessment. Our results showed that those who were on hemodialysis services characterized by increased complexity of structure presented a chance to assess their own health negatively.

The prevalence of self-assessment of poor health is extremely high compared to the one observed in the adult population that resided in households covered by the fixed phone network in the Brazilian state capitals and the Federal District in 2012, which was of 5.0%c. However, it is similar to that found among patients on dialysis in Denmark21 and Holland25, respectively 51.0% and 54.0%. It is also similar to the percentages of adults who reported having any long-term disease or disability in Brazil in 2003, 55.9%24, and in the elderly from different Brazilian cities in 2009, approximately 50.0%20. However, the population of this study is younger than the population of the studies cited. Such high prevalence of poor health self-assessment found in hemodialysis patients draws attention, since many authors have noted the high predictive power of morbidity and mortality resulting from a poor assessment of their own health7.

The results were consistent with population-based studies with adults4 and older adults20 being influenced by age, education, and the number of self-referred diseases in the health self-assessment. An association between self-assessment of poor health and sex was not identified, unlike other studies in adults10 and older adults3,4. The chance to assess health as bad was higher among individuals with lower education levels, regardless of other characteristics investigated. Education determines several advantages for health, because individuals with higher educational level are less likely to expose themselves to risk factors for diseases and, in general, have greater access to economic and social resources that promote better health18.

The association between the presence of diseases and poor health self-assessment confirms the account of other authors who have evaluated that relationship in surveys with adults in Brazil4,c. Nonetheless, in this population under the impact of a more severe chronic disease, which evolves with complications and restrictions in daily activities, only the account of three or more diseases were associated with poor health self-assessment. Other studies also identified the association between multiple morbidities and worse health assessment17. Other frequent disorders among these patients, such as changes in sleep, are related to the poor health self-assessment, as shown by our results. Similar association was also reported in hemodialysis patients in Italy16. Sleep disorders are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. As the incidence of these disorders is considerably higher among patients in end-stage chronic kidney disease, the potential effects could also be higher in this population26.

In this study, separated or divorced marital status was associated with less chance of reporting poor health self-assessment. A research carried out in Italy with hemodialysis patients showed that living alone or with other people has no association with poor health self-assessment16. However, studies in adults and older adults in Sweden11 and Japan10 showed that poor health self-assessment was associated with, respectively, being single and being divorced. In fact, the social support promoted by a partner or by family members is one of the most important factors to face the disease and treatment, since it contributes to a reduction in the incidence of depression and mortality, and to improve the quality of life of patient undergoing hemodialysis1.

The use of dialysis service is part of the weekly routine of these patients. The commuting time to the dialysis service can affect the health self-assessment of the patient, since it adds to the time that patients spend on dialysis. In this study, spending a longer time getting to the dialysis facility was associated with poor health self-assessment. A study performed with a representative sample of patients in hemodialysis of 12 countries found a higher risk of death and significantly lower quality of life in patients with longer commuting times to the dialysis service facility15. The longest time spent in the way to the service decreases the time available for other activities, also infuencing patients’ sleep and satisfaction with the received care19.

This is the first national-level study to investigate the prevalence of self-assessment of poor health in hemodialysis patients and its association with individual characteristics and dialysis services. It was possible to identify significant variance in poor health self-assessment among dialysis services after the control by sociodemographic and clinical variables. An increase in variance of poor health self-assessment was noticed among dialysis services in model II. This can happen when individual-level variables are negatively correlated with variation in the contextual level. The variance in poor health self-assessment among dialysis services in model II indicates the true variance between the services, after adjusting according to the differences in the profile of patients assisted in each unit.

The level of complexity of the service structure can explain 14.0% of variability in prevalence of poor health self-assessment among hemodialysis services, pointing to the importance of the structure of services for the maintenance of better health condition of these patients.

Individuals attended in dialysis services with better structure presented a lower chance to assess their health as poor. The highest level of complexity of dialysis service structure was characterized by location in hospitals, having a teaching activity, having the highest number of dialysis machines, working in three daily shifts or 24h, having its own vascular surgery service, performing kidney transplant, and performing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. It is possible that the patients in services with more complex structure have greater probability of access to alternative treatment in the same service, such as implementation of arteriovenous fistula, peritoneal dialysis, and transplant, which may influence the perception of security and better care from patients.

Other studies also identified a significant association between the structure of dialysis services and some results on patients’ health. Carvalho et al.6 found better results on survival of patients attended in dialysis services with the highest number of dialysis machines. In the same study, patients submitted to hemodialysis in services where cyclical peritoneal dialysis was the only treatment option had lower survival compared to those where there was no peritoneal dialysis service. Machado et al.12 noted that the access to kidney transplant was greater in dialysis services with less complex structure12. New studies may delve into aspects of how the structure of the services influence the self-assessment of health of patients in hemodialysis treatment.

Another possible explanation for the variability of poor health self-assessment among dialysis services can be attributed to differences in care practices. A study performed on 54 dialysis services in Italy showed that the greater social support performed by health professionals in dialysis services was associated with better health self-assessment16. Spiegel et al22 identified lower rates of mortality in dialysis services in which there were interpersonal relationships, more communication with the doctor, and earlier multidisciplinary meetings to discuss strategies for treatment after hospital discharge. In that case, the nutritionists addressed cultural aspects relevant to the patients’ care plan, better quality continuing education programs, and there was more engagement and discipline from the patients. Such differences have explained 31.0% of the variation of rates of mortality among the 90 dialysis services in the United States participating in the study in 200722.

Among the limitations of this study, we can cite the indicator used. Although there are many advantages in the use of health self-assessment as an indicator of health, limitations are described in literature about the lack of knowledge of the mechanisms and ways with which each individual evaluates their own health7. Another limitation refers to the use of the administrative registries of the CNES to characterize dialysis services. The use of such data, whose record does not aim to be used in research activities, can have the occurrence of incompleteness and inconsistencies as a limitation. Other variables that characterized the service, such as number of rooms and number of dialysis professionals were not included in the analysis due to the great loss of information. The last limitation is inherent to the design, which does not allow to state if the associated factor is determinant or determined by poor health self-assessment.

In conclusion, the high prevalence of poor health self-assessment found among hemodialysis patients in the SUS system was associated with age, years of education, marital status, commuting time from home to the dialysis service, number of self-referred diseases, and reports on difficulty of sleeping. Health self-assessment in this population does not involve only individual factors, but it is also related to the level of complexity of the structure of health services, confirming the multidimensional nature of this health indicator.

The acknowledgment of the effects of dialysis services in poor health self-assessment draws attention to the importance of the structure of the facilities, as an additional dimension of the strategy to improve the health of patients in hemodialysis in SUS. It is necessary that health professionals are alert to the aspects linked to worse health self-assessment and that public policies are implemented to prevent or delay undesirable forecasts in this population.


1. Aghakhani N, Sharif F, Molazem Z, Habibzadeh H. Content analysis and qualitative study of hemodialysis patients, family experience and perceived social support. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(3):e13748. DOI:10.5812/ircmj.13748 [ Links ]

2. Álvares J, Cesar CC, Acurcio FA, Andrade EIG, Cherchiglia ML. Quality of life of patients in renal replacement therapy in Brazil: comparison of treatment modalities. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(6):983-91. DOI:10.1007/s11136-011-0013-6 [ Links ]

3. Alves LC, Rodrigues RN. Determinantes da autopercepção de saúde entre idosos do Município de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005;17(5/6):333-41. DOI:10.1590/S1020-49892005000500005 [ Links ]

4. Barros MBA, Zanchetta LM, Moura EC, Malta DC. Auto-avaliação da saúde e fatores associados, Brasil, 2006. Rev Saude Publica. 2009;43 Supl 2:s27-37. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102009000900005 [ Links ]

5. Berglund E, Lytsy P, Westerling R. The influence of locus of control on self-rated health in context of chronic disease: a structural equation modeling approach in a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:492. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-492 [ Links ]

6. Carvalho MS, Henderson R, Shimakura S, Sousa IPSC. Survival of hemodialysis patients: modeling differences in risk of dialysis centers. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(3):189-96. DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzg035 189-196 [ Links ]

7. DeSalvo KB, Muntner P. Discordance between physician and patient self-rated health and all-cause mortality. Ochsner J. 2011;11(3): 232-40. [ Links ]

8. Fink JC, Hsu VD, Zhan M, Walker LD, Mullins CD, Jones-Burton C et al. Center effects in anemia management of dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(2):646-53. DOI:10.1681/ASN.2006050433 [ Links ]

9. Idler EL, Russell LB, Davis D. Survival, functional limitations, and self-rated health in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1992. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(9):874-83. DOI:10.1093/aje/152.9.874 [ Links ]

10. Kawada T, Suzuki S. Marital status and self-rated health in rural inhabitants in Japan: a cross-sectional study. J Divorce Remarriage. 2012;52(1):48-54. DOI:10.1080/10502556.2011.534395 [ Links ]

11. Lindström M. Marital status, social capital, material conditions and self-rated health:a population-based study. Health Policy. 2009;93(2-3):172-9. DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.010 [ Links ]

12. Machado EL, Caiaffa WT, César CC, Gomes IC, Andrade EIG, Acúrcio FA et al. Iniquities in the access to renal transplant for patients with end-stage chronic renal disease in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27 Supl 2:s284-97. DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2011001400015 [ Links ]

13. Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(4):290-7. DOI:10.1136/jech.2004.029454 [ Links ]

14. Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, Pasanen M, Urponen H. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(5):517-28. DOI:10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00045-0 [ Links ]

15. Moist LM, Bragg-Gresham JL, Pisoni RL, Saran R, Akiba T, Jacobson SH et al. Travel time to dialysis as a predictor of health-related quality of life, adherence, and mortality: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(4):641-50. DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.021 [ Links ]

16. Neri L, Brancaccio D, Rocca Rey LA, Rossa F, Martini A, Andreucci VE. Social support from health care providers is associated with reduced illness intrusiveness in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2011;75(2):125-34. DOI:10.5414/CNP75125 [ Links ]

17. Perruccio AV, Katz JN, Losina E. Health burden in chronic disease: multimorbidity is associated with self-rated health more than medical comorbidity alone. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(1):100-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.013 [ Links ]

18. Pimenta FAP, Bicalho MAC, Romano-Silva MA, Moraes EN, Rezende NA. Doenças crônicas, cognição, declínio funcional e Índice de Charlson em idosos com demência. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2013;59(4):326-34. DOI:10.1016/j.ramb.2013.02.002 [ Links ]

19. Silva GM, Gomes IC, Machado EM, Rocha FH, Andrade EIG, Acurcio FA et al. Uma avaliação da satisfação de pacientes em hemodiálise crônica com o tratamento em serviços de diálise no Brasil. Physis. 2011;21(2):581-600. DOI:10.1590/S0103-73312011000200013 [ Links ]

20. Silva RJS, Smith-Menezes A, Tribess S, Rómo-Perez V, Virtuoso Júnior JS. Prevalência e fatores associados à percepção negativa da saúde em pessoas idosas no Brasil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012;15(1):49-62. DOI:10.1590/S1415-790X2012000100005 [ Links ]

21. Sondergaard H, Juul S. Self-rated and functioning in patients with chronic renal disease. Dan Med Bul. 2010;57(12):A4220. [ Links ]

22. Spiegel B, Bolus R, Desai AA, Zagar P, Parker T, Moran J et al. Dialysis practices that distinguish facilities with below- versus above-expected mortality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(11):2024-33. DOI:10.2215/CJN.01620210 [ Links ]

23. Tangri N, Tighiouart H, Meyer KB, Miskulin DC. Both patient and facility contribute to achieving the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ pay-for-performance target for dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(12):2296-302. DOI:10.1681/ASN.2010111137 [ Links ]

24. Theme Filha MM, Szwarcwald CL, Souza-Junior PRB. Medidas de morbidade referida e inter-relações com dimensões de saúde. Rev Saude Publica. 2008;42(1):73-81. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102008000100010 [ Links ]

25. Thong MS, Kaptein AA, Benyamini Y, Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW, Dekker FW. Association between a self-rated health question and mortality in young and old dialysis patients: a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(1):111-7. DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.04.001 [ Links ]

26. Trojan DA, Kaminska M, Bar-Or A, Benedetti A, Lapierre Y, Da Costa D et al. Polysomnographic measures of disturbed sleep are associated with reduced quality of life in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2012;316(1-2):158-63. DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2011.12.013 [ Links ]

27. Zuilen AD, Blankestijn PJ, Buren M, Dam MA, Kaasjager KA, Ligtenberg G et al. Quality of care in patients with chronic kidney disease is determined by hospital specific factors. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(11):3647-54. DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfq184 [ Links ]

aMinistério da Saúde. Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde – CNESNet. Brasília (DF); 2007 [cited 2007 Jan 15]. Available from:

bKolenikov S, Angeles G. The use of discrete data in principal component analysis with applications to socioeconomic indices. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Carolina Population Center; 2004. (CPC/MEASURE Working paper nº WP-04-850).

cMinistério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção de Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2012: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Brasília (DF); 2013.

Funding: Fundo Nacional de Saúde/Ministério da Saúde (Process 4864/2005) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq – Process 409729/2006-0).

Received: September 30, 2014; Accepted: June 9, 2015

Correspondence: Tiago Ricardo Moreira. Departamento de Medicina e Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Viçosa. Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n Sala 401 Campus Universitário 36570-900 Viçosa, MG, Brasil. E-mail:

Authors’ Contribution: Conception, planning, analysis, and interpretation of the data: TRM, MLC, CCC, and LG. Drafting of the manuscript: TRM, MLC, and LG. Review and approval of the final version of the manuscript: FAA, EIGA, MLC, CCC, and LG.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License  This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.