Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Factors associated with self-reported exposure to chemical substances at work in Brazil: results from the National Health Survey, 2013

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of self-reported exposure to chemical substances at work and its associated factors in a sample of Brazilian adults that participated in the National Health Survey, conducted between 2013 and 2014.

METHODS

Our sample consisted of adults aged 18 years or older that answered question E1 of module E: “In the week of July 21-27, 2013 (reference week), did you work as regular employee or intern for at least an hour in any activity paid with cash?” Sociodemographic data, situation and health behaviors were analyzed with single and multivariate binary logistic regression. The model was adjusted by the variables of all groups, adopting a 5% significance level. The values of odds ratio (OR) and respective confidence intervals were obtained.

RESULTS

Women (OR = 0.74; 95%CI 0.66–0.82) had a lower chance of exposure to chemicals. The highest chances were observed in groups with no instruction or that attended up to middle-school (OR = 1.77; 95%CI 1.50–2.08), high school (OR = 1.62; 95%CI 1.37–1.91), age between 25 and 54 years (OR = 1.26; 95%CI 1.07–1.48), current smokers (OR = 1.21; 95%CI 1.07–1.37), who reported tiredness (OR = 1.35; 95%CI 1.21–1.50), hearing difficulties (OR = 1.24; 95%CI 1.04–1.48) and who reported having suffered an accident at work (OR = 2.00; 95%CI 1.57–2.54).

CONCLUSIONS

The unprecedented results cover the entire workforce. Positive associations with hearing loss, smoking and history of work accidents are consistent, as well as the inverse association with education level and gender differences. The absence of association with asthma was surprising. To fill gaps in investigations on chronic non-communicable diseases, we suggested improving the PNS collection instrument in the occupational dimension.

Occupational exposure; Chemical Compounds; Working conditions; Occupational Health; Health Surveys; National Survey on Health

RESUMO

OBJETIVO

Descrever os fatores associados e a prevalência de exposição autorrelatada a substâncias químicas no trabalho em uma amostra de adultos brasileiros que participaram da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, realizada entre 2013 e 2014.

MÉTODOS

A amostra para análise da exposição foi constituída por trabalhadores com 18 anos ou mais de idade que responderam à questão E1 do módulo E: “Na semana de 21 a 27 de julho de 2013 (semana de referência), você trabalhou ou estagiou, durante pelo menos uma hora, em alguma atividade remunerada em dinheiro?” Os dados sociodemográficos, situação e comportamentos de saúde foram analisados com regressão logística binária uni e multivariada. O modelo foi ajustado pelas variáveis de todos os blocos, adotando-se o nível de significância de 5%. Obtiveram-se os valores de odds ratio (OR) e respectivos intervalos de confiança.

RESULTADOS

Mulheres (OR = 0,74; IC95% 0,66–0,82) tiveram menor chance de exposição a substâncias químicas. As maiores chances foram observadas nos grupos com nível fundamental de instrução ou sem instrução (OR = 1,77; IC95% 1,50–2,08), nível médio de instrução (OR = 1,62; IC95% 1,37–1,91), idade entre 25 e 54 anos (OR = 1,26; IC95% 1,07–1,48), fumantes atuais (OR = 1,21; IC95% 1,07–1,37), com problemas de cansaço (OR = 1,35; IC95% 1,21–1,50), com dificuldade auditiva (OR = 1,24; IC95% 1,04–1,48) e que relataram ter sofrido acidente de trabalho (OR = 2,00; IC95% 1,57–2,54).

CONCLUSÕES

Os resultados inéditos abrangem o conjunto da força de trabalho. Associações positivas com cansaço, dificuldade auditiva, acidentes de trabalho e tabagismo, assim como a associação inversa com o nível de escolaridade, além das diferenças de gênero, são consistentes. A ausência de associação com asma foi surpreendente. A fim de preencher lacunas nas investigações sobre doenças crônicas não transmissíveis em adultos, sugere-se aperfeiçoar o instrumento da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde na dimensão ocupacional.

Exposição Ocupacional; Compostos Químicos; Condições de Trabalho; Saúde do Trabalhador; Inquéritos Epidemiológicos; Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde

INTRODUCTION

In the ranking of risks related to the global burden of disease in Brazil, in 2015, occupational factors presented a prominent position when compared with other factors such as insufficient physical activity among men and alcohol use among women11. Malta DC, Felisbino-Mendes MS, Machado IE, Passos VMA, Abreu DMX, Ishitani LH, et al. Fatores de risco relacionados à carga global de doença do Brasil e Unidades Federadas, 2015. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017;20 Supl 1:217-32. http://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201700050018
http://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720170005...
. Exposure to chemical risks in the work environment has not been sufficiently characterized and dimensioned in Brazil. Technological innovations incorporated into the systems and processes increased the number of chemicals manufactured, in addition to the dissemination of by-products during their manufacture22. Levy L. Chemical hazards in the workplace: an overview. Occup Med (Lond). 2004;54(2):67-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017...
. The world’s distribution of the production and consumption of chemicals is heterogeneous, generating inequalities in exposure to harmful agents. Lately, the participation of the BRICS countries, Brazil included, in the annual sales of chemicals increased from 13% to 28%, whereas the participation of European Union countries33. United Nations Environment Programme. Global chemicals outlook: towards sound management of chemicals. Nairobi (KEN): UNEP; 2013 [cited 2018 Apr 21]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=1966&menu=35
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/in...
decreased from 77% to 63%. In 2010, the Dominican Republic imported more than 6,000 tons of pesticides, of which 50% were banned in European Union countries44. Hutter HP, Kundi M, Lemmerer K, Poteser M, Weitensfelder L, Wallner P, et al. Subjective symptoms of male workers linked to occupational pesticide exposure on coffee plantations in the Jarabacoa Region, Dominican Republic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102099
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102099...
.

Exposure to particles disseminated in the workplace contributes to 15% of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases55. Sadhra SS, Kurmi OP, Chambers H, Lam KBH, Fishwick D; The Occupational COPD Research Group. Development of an occupational airborne chemical exposure matrix. Occup Med (Lond). 2016;66(5):358-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw027
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw027...
. It is estimated that 2% to 8% of all cancers are caused by agents present in the work environment, mostly chemicals. These chemicals include arsenic, asbestos, beryllium benzene, cadmium, chromium, nickel, diesel, ethylene oxide, ionizing radiation and silica, among others, widely used in various productive sectors22. Levy L. Chemical hazards in the workplace: an overview. Occup Med (Lond). 2004;54(2):67-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017...
. The impact of occupational risk factors on cancer in Brazil was 2.3% among men and 0.3% among women. These numbers are lower than in other countries. The authors suggest an underestimated prevalence in Brazil, where estimates use official sources66. Azevedo e Silva G, Moura L, Curado MP, Gomes FS, Otero U, Rezende LFM, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to ways of life, infections, occupation, and environmental agents in Brazil in 2020. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148761
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.014...
. However, the informal labor market, which is hardly covered by information systems, absorbs more than 50% of the workforce and tends to concentrate more unhealthy positions and functions than the formal market77. Kalleberg AL. Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. Am Sociol Rev. 2009;74(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409074001...
,88. Schulte PA, Pana-Cryan R, Schnorr T, Schill AL, Guerin R, Felknor S, et al. An approach to assess the burden of work-related injury, disease, and distress. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(7):1051-7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303765
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303765...
. Moreover, cases tend to focus on small groups of workers, which are largely not included in official statistics99. Otero UB, Mello MSC. Fração atribuível a fatores de risco ocupacionais para câncer no Brasil: evidências e limitações. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2016;62(1):43-5.,1010. Castro TGM, Lima EP, Assunção AA. Panorama dos inquéritos ocupacionais no Brasil (2005-2015): uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019;24(8):2923-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.18042017
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248...
.

Since the 1970s, several countries have started conducting periodic surveys on working conditions and health in national or transnational samples of workers to identify occupational exposure to chemicals, among other objectives1111. Weiler A. Working conditions surveys: a comparative analysis: report. Dublin (IRL): European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions; 2007 [citado 17 jan 2019]. Diponível em: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2007/working-conditions/working-conditions-surveys-a-comparative-analysis.
https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publicat...
. Between 2007 and 2012, this initiative was incorporated by Latin American countries, which collected data in the workplace or at the worker’s household through self-reports1010. Castro TGM, Lima EP, Assunção AA. Panorama dos inquéritos ocupacionais no Brasil (2005-2015): uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019;24(8):2923-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.18042017
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248...
. Specific tests showed good reliability of the questionnaires1212. Sabastizagal I, Vives A, Astete J, Burgos M, Gimeno-Ruiz de Porras D, Benavides FG. Fiabilidad y cumplimiento de las preguntas sobre condiciones de trabajo incluidas en el cuestionario CTESLAC: resultados del Estudio sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Seguridad y Salud en Perú. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2018;21(4):196-202..

In Brazil, the results of the national survey of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) on employment are periodically published, in addition to those originated from national surveys on the health of the general population conducted by the Ministry of Health and partner institutions1313. Malta DC, Leal MC, Costa MFL, Morais Neto OL. Inquéritos Nacionais de Saúde: experiência acumulada e proposta para o inquérito de saúde brasileiro. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2008;11 Supl 1:159-67. https:/doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2008000500017
https:/doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2008000...
. The first does not incorporate specific modules on health. The latter do not incorporate modules on employment and work. In 2013, the National Health Survey inaugurated the possibility of broadening the perspective, once the E module on the employment situation of the adult drawn for the interview at home and module M on handling chemicals by this adult in the workplace were incorporated, as well as specific modules for morbidities, risk behaviors and access to services1414. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas: Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2014 [cited 2018 Jan 17]. Available from: ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/PNS/2013/pns2013.pdf
ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/PNS/2013/pns2013.p...
. This information is useful because it covers gaps in official sources. In addition to this advantage, the National Health Survey covers adults regardless of the type of insertion in the workforce. Surveys with instruments applied in households through interviews with workers have been proposed1212. Sabastizagal I, Vives A, Astete J, Burgos M, Gimeno-Ruiz de Porras D, Benavides FG. Fiabilidad y cumplimiento de las preguntas sobre condiciones de trabajo incluidas en el cuestionario CTESLAC: resultados del Estudio sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Seguridad y Salud en Perú. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2018;21(4):196-202.,1515. Benavides FG, Merino-Salazar P, Cornelio C, Assunção AA, Agudelo-Suárez AA, Amable M, et al. Cuestionario básico y criterios metodológicos para las Encuestas sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Empleo y Salud en América Latina y el Caribe. Cad Saude Publica. 2016;32(9):e00210715. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00210715
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x0021071...
.

Despite its limits, the National Health Survey already show encouraging results, such as monitoring risk behaviors1616. Macinko J, Mullachery P, Silver D, Jimenez G, Morais Neto OL. Patterns of alcohol consumption and related behaviors in Brazil: evidence from the 2013 National Health Survey (PNS 2013). PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0134153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134153
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.013...
, access to services1717. Mullachery P, Silver D, Macinko J. Changes in health care inequity in Brazil between 2008 and 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0431-8
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0431-...
and risks of cardiovascular diseases1818. Lotufo PA. Cardiovascular diseases in Brazil: premature mortality, risk factors and priorities for action. Comments on the preliminary results from the Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS), 2013. Sao Paulo Med J. 2015;133(2):69-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2015.13320018
https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2015.1...
, to name a few.

We sought to describe the associated factors and the prevalence of self-reported exposure to chemical substances at work in the sample of Brazilian active adults, according to PNS data.

METHODS

Data Source and Target Population

The PNS is a population-based household survey that is part of the Integrated System of Household Surveys (SIPD) of IBGE, in which the entire national territory was included. The target population of the PNS consists of people living in permanent private households (PPH), and the questionnaire applied in the selected households consists of three parts: household information; general characteristics of all its residents; and information from an adult resident, 18 years of age or older, randomly selected. This last part provided most of the information of interest in our study.

PNS Sample Planning

The primary sampling units (PSU) of the PNS are census tracts or sets of census tracts, when they have few households. PSU were stratified according to four different criteria: administrative, geographic, situation and statistical. The sampling plan used was cluster sampling in three stages of selection, and in the first stage the selection of the census tract, in the second stage the selection of the household and in the third stage the selection of a resident aged 18 years or more within each household of the sample. In Souza-Júnior’s work1919. Souza-Júnior PRB, Freitas MPS, Antonaci GA, Szwarcwald CL. Desenho da amostra da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2015;24(2):207-16. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200003
https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-4974201500...
, detailed information on the PNS sample design is available.

Our sample consisted of adults aged 18 years or older that answered question E1 of module E: “In the week of July 21–27, 2013 (reference week), did you work as regular employee or intern for at least an hour in any activity paid with cash?”. Our sample has 36,442 Brazilians that responded positively to E1 and, therefore, are considered active.

Study variables

Module M of the PNS questionnaire is called “Other characteristics of work and social support.” Question M11 is divided into eight questions related to occupational exposure (chemical, physical and psychosocial risks), as follows: handling of chemical substances, handling of municipal waste (garbage); exposure to noise (loud noise), involvement in activities that lead to nervousness; long exposure to the sun; exposure to biological material; handling of radioactive material; exposure to industrial dust (marble dust). The individual that responded positively to the item “handling of chemical substances” was considered to be exposed to chemicals: “Thinking about your work, are you exposed to any of these factors that may affect your health?” Among the alternatives, two items refer to chemical agents: a) handling of chemical substances; and h) exposure to industrial dust (marble dust). The first was used because it coincides with the question tested in the instrument Cuestionario Básico sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Empleo y Salud en América Latina y el Caribe (CTESLAC questionnaire). This questionnaire is a consensus among researchers from several countries. The test results indicated good reliability of the question1212. Sabastizagal I, Vives A, Astete J, Burgos M, Gimeno-Ruiz de Porras D, Benavides FG. Fiabilidad y cumplimiento de las preguntas sobre condiciones de trabajo incluidas en el cuestionario CTESLAC: resultados del Estudio sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Seguridad y Salud en Perú. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2018;21(4):196-202.. The second item refers to marble powder. However, since it refers to a specific agent, it was not used, given the purpose of this research to know the exposure to chemical substances in general.

In the first group of explanatory variables, the following sociodemographic factors were analyzed: gender (male and female), age group (18 to 24 years, 25 to 54 years and 55 years or more), marital status (with partner and without partner), level of education (college, high and middle school or no instruction), race (white, black, brown and others). In the second, the factors related to health and life habits: health assessment (“very good,” “good” and “regular,” “bad” or “very bad”), sleep problems (“no” and “yes”), tiredness (“no” and “yes”), work accident in the prior 12 months (“no” and “yes”), diagnosis of hypertension (“no” and “yes”), diagnosis of depression (“no” and “yes”), diagnosis of asthma or asthmatic bronchitis (“no” and “yes”), heavy episodic drinking – considered as the intake of four doses or more on a single occasion (“no” and “yes”), and current smoking (“no” and “yes”). The question that gave rise to the variable hearing impairment [“Do you have hearing impairment?” (“no” and “yes”)] followed the introduction: “Now let’s address permanent hearing loss, that is, partial or total loss of the possibilities of hearing.”

Statistical Analysis

First, a descriptive analysis of the outcome “exposure to chemicals” was performed by stratifying the sample per federation unit (FU), and this distribution was illustrated by constructing a thematic map using the Mapi-info program, version 10.0. Initially, a descriptive analysis of all studied variables was made by estimating relative frequencies and constructing a bar graph. The evaluation of the possible factors associated with exposure to chemical substances was performed using the single and multivariate binary logistic regression model. The significance level adopted for the selection of variables in the univariate analysis was 20%. The variables that reached this level were included in the multivariate analysis. Each block of variables (sociodemographic, morbidity-related and behavior-related characteristics) created a model to remove the variables using the backward method. The variables at 5% significance level continued in the final model of each group.

Then the model was adjusted by the variables of all groups, keeping the significant ones at the level of 5%. The odds ratio (OR) value were estimated, with 95% confidence interval (95%CI), both in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Hosmer-Lemeshow test and prediction calculation qualified the model adjustment. The probabilities of occurrence of the outcome were also estimated according to different profiles, considering the equation of the final logistic model.

All analyses were performed with attention to the characteristics of the complex sample of the PNS, considering the expansion factors or sample weights of the households and all their residents, as well as of the resident selected for the interview. The strata used in the sampling plan were also defined. The sample expansion was performed through the svy command, available in the Stata version 12.0 program, and it was considered in all analyses performed.

The National Research Ethics Commission (Conep) was responsible for the approval of the PNS project, through process no. 328,159, on June 26, 2013.

RESULTS

The prevalence of exposure to chemical substances in the Brazilian population was 18.1%. Figure 1 shows the distribution of prevalence in Brazil, in which the South region stood out, with its three states showing the highest percentages.

Figure 1
Prevalence of exposure to chemical substances in the Brazilian population in each of the 26 states and in the Federal District, according to data from the National Health Survey, Brazil, 2013.

The sample consisted of 53.4% of men. The prevalence of exposure to chemicals was 20.3% among men and 15.5% among women (data not shown in table). Regarding the characteristics of the sample, 74.5% reported age between 25 and 54 years, 60.2% had no partners, 41.5% reported having attended up to middle-school or having no instruction and 48.5% were mixed-race (Table 1).

Table 1
Univariate analysis evaluating the sociodemographic factors associated with exposure to chemical substances, according to data from the National Health Survey, Brazil, 2013.

Regarding health-related factors, 27.8% rated their health as regular, bad or very bad, 27.2% reported having sleep problems and 31.0% reported tiredness. The prevalence of reporting hearing difficulties was 6.8%. Regarding work accidents, 2.9% said they had suffered some. Out of the interviewees, 16.6% reported having been diagnosed with hypertension, 5.9% with depression and 4.3% with asthma or asthmatic bronchitis. Regarding life habits, 57.0% of the interviewees have alcohol consumption considered at risk and 15.4% currently smoke (Table 2).

Table 2
Univariate analysis evaluating the characteristics related to the health situation and life habits associated with exposure to chemical substances, according to data from the National Health Survey, Brazil, 2013.

According to the univariate analysis, sociodemographic factors (Table 1) associated with higher prevalence of chemical exposure were: female gender, age ranging between 25–54 years, living without a partner, and higher education level (p < 0.05). Regarding the factors related to health (Table 2), those that were significantly associated with the higher prevalence of exposure to chemical substances were: sleep problems, tiredness and hearing difficulties. They were also significantly associated with a higher prevalence of exposure to chemicals, having assessed health as regular, bad or very bad; having suffered an accident at work and reporting a diagnosis of depression. Considering life habits shown in Table 2, being a current smoker was associated with a higher prevalence of exposure to chemical substances.

In the final model, the variables gender, age group, level of education, current smoking, tiredness, hearing difficulties and work accidents remained associated with exposure to chemical substances (Table 3). The model presented good adjustment according to Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics at a 5% significance level.

Table 3
Multivariate analysis evaluating sociodemographic factors, life habits and health situation associated with exposure to chemical substances, according to data from the National Health Survey, Brazil, 2013.

According to multivariate analysis, women (OR = 0.74; 95%CI 0.66–0.82) have a lower chance of exposure to chemicals than men. A higher chance of this exposure was observed in the group aged between 25 and 54 years (OR = 1.26; 95%CI 1.07–1.48) when compared with those aged up to 25 years, and in those that reported having studied up to the middle-school or no instruction (OR = 1.77; 95%CI 1.50–2.08) when compared with those with higher education. Individuals with high school (OR = 1.62; 95%CI 1.37–1.91) also had a higher chance of exposure to chemicals when compared with those with higher education. Smokers (OR = 1.21; 95%CI 1.07–1.37), with tiredness (OR = 1.35; 95%CI 1.21–1.50), hearing difficulties (OR = 1.24; 95%CI 1.04–1.48) and that reported having suffered an accident at work (OR = 2.00; 95%CI 1.57–2.54) had a higher chance of exposure to chemical substances when compared with those with an antagonistic condition (Table 3).

The prevalence of exposure to chemical substances was estimated considering the final model of binary logistic regression regarding the profiles shown in Figure 2. The probability of exposure to chemical substances was 13.8% among women aged between 18 and 24 years, with higher education, who do not currently smoke, who did not report tiredness or hearing difficulties and did not suffer an accident at work in the prior 12 months. On the other hand, we observed an increase of 67.1% in the probability of exposure in the group of men aged between 25 and 54 years, with no instruction or who attended up to middle-school, who currently smoke and reported tiredness or hearing difficulties and who suffered work accidents in the prior year.

Figure 2
Probability diagram of exposure to chemical substances, according to the final logistic regression model, with data from the National Health Survey (PNS), Brazil, 2013.

DISCUSSION

According to the data collected at the household, almost one-fifth of Brazilian workers, regardless of employment or type of remuneration, reported handling of chemical substances at work. Although high, the occurrence is below the statistics recorded in the United States and France: 22.3%2020. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Hartman C, Stoddard AM, Quinn MM, et al. The inverse hazard law: blood pressure, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, workplace abuse and occupational exposures in US low-income black, white and Latino workers. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):1970-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.039
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008...
and 30%2121. Vincent R. Les produits chimiques au travail: des risques souvent ignorés. Hyg Secur Travail. 2015;238:22-5., respectively. When men and women are observed separately, the results are above the recorded in Honduras and Argentina, but below what was found in Ecuador2222. Benavides FG, López-Ruiz M, Rojas M, Herrera MSP, Chavarría J, Cornelio C, et al. Informe de salud ocupacional en América Latina y el Caribe, brechas de desigualdad en la salud de las personas que trabajan. Heredia (CRI): Saltra/ IRET-UNA; 2018.. Positive associations with hearing loss, smoking and history of work accidents, as well as the inverse association with education level and gender differences, are consistent. The absence of association with diagnosis of asthma or asthmatic bronchitis was, to some extent, unexpected.

The higher occurrence of occupational exposure among men was predictable, since there are more men absorbed in sectors in which handling or contact with chemical substances predominate. The configurations of male and female identities are reproduced in the distribution of men and women in the labor market.

Regional differences were observed in the exposure to chemical substances, indicating an association with the geoeconomics in the country. The self-report of exposure was almost threefold in states in the South region when compared with those in the Northeast region. Clarifications about the regional heterogeneity of Brazilian industry are useful to interpret this result. In the 1990s, numerous industrial companies moved or settled in the Southern region, which is close to Mercosur countries, probably attracted by good infrastructure, wages lower than those in the Southeast region and recognized performance in the fiscal war2424. Saboia, J. Descentralização industrial no Brasil na década de noventa: um processo dinâmico e diferenciado regionalmente. Nova Econ. 2009;11(2):85-122.. When analyzing the most important federation units for each economic activity, the authors found the strength of Minas Gerais and São Paulo for industry, followed, without distinction between them, by the states of Ceará and Rio de Janeiro, in addition to the three southern states2525. Kubrusly LS. A população ocupada e a renda no Brasil: encontros e desencontros. Econ Soc. 2011;20(3):567-600. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-06182011000300005
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-0618201100...
. This approximates with the map of exposure to chemicals. Production sectors should be further studied with finer levels of disaggregation2626. Guida HL, Morini RG, Cardoso ACV. Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida. Braz J Othorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(4):423-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-8694201000...
. The new scenario of production, consumption and configuration of the labor market probably brings elements to interpret the higher occurrence of exposure in regions considered less industrialized, because conservation and cleaning sectors and activities in agro-industry abundantly incorporate chemical substances and are present in all regions.

The association with the report of hearing difficulty show the necessity to understand the ototoxic effect of various chemical substances potentially capable of causing sensorineural alterations in the ear. Metal solvents and organophosphate pesticides are included among the main chemical agents that can lead to hearing alterations2626. Guida HL, Morini RG, Cardoso ACV. Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida. Braz J Othorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(4):423-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-8694201000...
.

Regarding the association with occupational accidents, combined exposure to various risks is recognized, especially in the industry2727. Sexton K, Linder SH. Cumulative risk assessment for combined health effects from chemical and nonchemical stressors. Am J Public Health. 2011;101 Suppl 1:S81-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300118
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300118...
. Most chemicals handled in work processes cause neurological effects, which decrease concentration and wakefulness2828. Das-Munshi J, Rubin GJ, Wessely S. Multiple chemical sensitivities: A systematic review of provocation studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(6):1257-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.046
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.0...
. It is plausible that there is a relationship between this effect and the occurrence of accidents. Moreover, more polluted environments coincide with those at greater risk for accidents. Such findings justify the interest in addressing a combined contribution from occupational risks.

The incidence of asthma in adults is often related to occupational exposure, being, for example, the most common health problem among workers in the furniture industry in Turkey2929. Mandiracioglu A, Akgur S, Kocabiyik N, Sener U. Evaluation of neuropsychological symptoms and exposure to benzene, toluene and xylene among two different furniture worker groups in Izmir. Toxicol Ind Health. 2011;27(9):802-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309
https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309...
. Asthma is considered an occupational disease when a relationship between its symptoms and substances present in the work environment is identified. Episodes are induced by sensitivity to a specific substance inhaled by the worker. Another frequent picture concerns the worsening of pre-existing asthma by a stimulus present in the workplace3030. Lemière C, Boulet LP, Chaboillez S, Forget A, Chiry S, Villeneuve H, et al. Work-exacerbated asthma and occupational asthma: do they really differ? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(3):704-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.0...
. The absence of association observed in the PNS sample is probably an effect of the selection bias3131. Naimi AI, Richardson DB, Cole SR. Causal inference in occupational epidemiology: accounting for the healthy worker effect by using structural nested models. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(12):681-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt215
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt215...
, since people intervene in their own situations, for example, changing jobs or avoiding the handling of chemicals to prevent respiratory symptoms. Limits related to the coverage of health systems are possible, since the questionnaire mentioned medical diagnosis.

Positive association with tiredness was expected. Painters, varnishers, attendants and farmers are often exposed to the organic solvents that compose the products used in the development of their tasks. Many symptoms related to these substances are nonspecific, including nausea, difficulty concentrating and attention, sleep disorders, fatigue and abnormal tiredness2828. Das-Munshi J, Rubin GJ, Wessely S. Multiple chemical sensitivities: A systematic review of provocation studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(6):1257-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.046
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.0...
. In Turkey, 39.8% of workers in the furniture industry, whose environments are generally contaminated by the by-products of paints and varnishes, complained of abnormal fatigue2929. Mandiracioglu A, Akgur S, Kocabiyik N, Sener U. Evaluation of neuropsychological symptoms and exposure to benzene, toluene and xylene among two different furniture worker groups in Izmir. Toxicol Ind Health. 2011;27(9):802-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309
https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309...
. In coffee plantations in the Dominican Republic, 76% of workers exposed to various classes of pesticides reported abnormal tiredness, as opposed to 39% of those not exposed44. Hutter HP, Kundi M, Lemmerer K, Poteser M, Weitensfelder L, Wallner P, et al. Subjective symptoms of male workers linked to occupational pesticide exposure on coffee plantations in the Jarabacoa Region, Dominican Republic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102099
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102099...
.

Generally, less educated workers occupy more dangerous jobs. Thus, this is the reverse law of risk: the overlap of harmful factors tends to be inversely proportional to the stock of resources and the degree of power of the individuals and groups affected to modify their situation2020. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Hartman C, Stoddard AM, Quinn MM, et al. The inverse hazard law: blood pressure, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, workplace abuse and occupational exposures in US low-income black, white and Latino workers. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):1970-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.039
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008...
. The lack of safety information, mistakes in spray operations and weak personal protection devices, which are related to the low education of workers, are among the aggravating factors of the effects of exposure to chemicals66. Azevedo e Silva G, Moura L, Curado MP, Gomes FS, Otero U, Rezende LFM, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to ways of life, infections, occupation, and environmental agents in Brazil in 2020. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148761
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.014...
. Moreover, low schooling also has to do with fewer resources for the elaboration of positive confrontations, from which elements are obtained to interpret the adoption of less healthy habits – in this case, smoking.

Significant associations between smoking habits and occupational exposure to chemicals are consistent. Blood levels of substances generated in the work environment are higher in smokers than in their non-smoking colleagues2929. Mandiracioglu A, Akgur S, Kocabiyik N, Sener U. Evaluation of neuropsychological symptoms and exposure to benzene, toluene and xylene among two different furniture worker groups in Izmir. Toxicol Ind Health. 2011;27(9):802-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309
https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309...
. Previous studies have evidenced the greater chance of individuals exposed to unhealthy work environments to report cigarette consumption as a negative way to deal with stress originated in these situations3232. Chin DL, Hong O, Gillen M, Bates MN, Okechukwu CA. Cigarette smoking in building trades workers: the impact of work environment. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(5):429-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22031
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22031...
. PNS 2013 data allowed the authors to observe the reduction in the prevalence of tobacco smokers in the analyzed period (2008 to 2013)3333. Malta DC, Vieira ML, Szwarcwald CL, Caixeta R, Brito SMF, Reis AAC.. Tendência de fumantes na população Brasileira segundo a Pesquisa Nacional de Amostra de Domicílios 2008 e a Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;18 Supl 2:45-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500060005
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-54972015000...
. However, gender disparities persist, with less reduction among men. We can assume the influence of working conditions in this area, since more polluted posts allocate more men than women2323. Messing K, Stellman JM. Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: the importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res. 2006;101(2):149-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.03.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.03...
.

Regarding occupational hygiene, the decrease in the magnitude of exposure to chemical substances in the workplace has been reported. Probably, the advance of worker health programs in the control of exposure contributes to this reality, in addition to the reduction of the effective in traditional and dangerous industries, such as coal mining, iron and steel casting, mineral extraction, etc. Overall, they would be a reflection of the change in the occupational structure that is expressed on three fronts: a decrease in the agricultural workforce; decreasing trend at the occupational level in industry, construction and mining; and expansion of labor absorption in the service sector22. Levy L. Chemical hazards in the workplace: an overview. Occup Med (Lond). 2004;54(2):67-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017...
. This reality led to the favor of other occupational health priorities, such as stress at work, accidents due to falls and musculoskeletal problems. On the other hand, in sectors whose greatest expression in the absorption of the workforce has occurred recently, workers are routinely exposed to chemicals (e.g., leisure and entertainment industry and conservation and cleaning companies). Admittedly relevant, either due to the magnitude or due to the aggressiveness of the effects of these substances on work capacity, recent data on disease load and fraction attributable to occupational risks for cancer66. Azevedo e Silva G, Moura L, Curado MP, Gomes FS, Otero U, Rezende LFM, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to ways of life, infections, occupation, and environmental agents in Brazil in 2020. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148761
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.014...
in the Brazilian population reinforce the importance of continuing to try to identify occupational exposure.

In the PNS questionnaire, only one question asked about exposure to chemicals.

Although the content of the question coincides with the filter question of most instruments tested and used in recent national and transnational surveys focused on samples of workers1515. Benavides FG, Merino-Salazar P, Cornelio C, Assunção AA, Agudelo-Suárez AA, Amable M, et al. Cuestionario básico y criterios metodológicos para las Encuestas sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Empleo y Salud en América Latina y el Caribe. Cad Saude Publica. 2016;32(9):e00210715. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00210715
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x0021071...
, information biases are expected from self-reports obtained from face-to-face interviews1010. Castro TGM, Lima EP, Assunção AA. Panorama dos inquéritos ocupacionais no Brasil (2005-2015): uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019;24(8):2923-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.18042017
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248...
.

The researchers’ recent effort to standardize questions about working conditions to encourage periodic surveys in Latin American countries and increase the possibility of comparing was successful3434. Merino-Salazar P, Artazcoz L, Campos-Serna J, Gimeno D, Benavides FG. National working conditions surveys in Latin America: comparison of methodological characteristics. Int J Occup Environl Health. 2015;21(3):266-74. https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396715Y.0000000004
https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396715Y.0000...
. The CTESLAC questionnaire indicaste tio questiones for the topic “chemicals”: Q27 Handles, applies or is in contact with chemical/harmful/toxic substances? and Q28. Breathes chemical substances in the form of dust, fumes, aerosols, vapors, gases and/or fog (excluding tobacco smoke)?1515. Benavides FG, Merino-Salazar P, Cornelio C, Assunção AA, Agudelo-Suárez AA, Amable M, et al. Cuestionario básico y criterios metodológicos para las Encuestas sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Empleo y Salud en América Latina y el Caribe. Cad Saude Publica. 2016;32(9):e00210715. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00210715
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x0021071...
. The impasses to create consensus in the research instruments structure international networks of researchers. The question of the PNS questionnaire coincides with one of the questions of the questionnaire already applied in Latin American countries and the European Union. However, an effort is expected to improve the questionnaire to complete the questions and favor the desired consensus.

The lack of reliable and quality information encourages researchers to seek self-reported information on a wide variety of exposures, such as medication use, diet, smoking and occupational history. Using self-reports to define exposed and unexposed and to estimate the duration of exposure is one of the critical components of most epidemiological studies. However, results of specific studies, such as the verification of the quality of self-reported information on exposure to pesticides, encouraged researchers to maintain and apply questionnaires through interviews3535. Hoppin JA, Yucel F, Dosemeci M, Sandler DP. Accuracy of self-reported pesticide use duration information from licensed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. J Exp Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002;12(5):313-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500232
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500232...
.

Unlike information on diseases and accidents, which are also essential, studies on exposure have the advantage of facilitating timely and effective intervention, since they precede the effects and damage. We expect our results to instigate the (re)formulation of questions about occupational exposure in future national health surveys, because the various existing information systems are fragmented, usually incomplete, either because they do not cover the population informally inserted in the labor market, or because they depend on systems not yet consolidated66. Azevedo e Silva G, Moura L, Curado MP, Gomes FS, Otero U, Rezende LFM, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to ways of life, infections, occupation, and environmental agents in Brazil in 2020. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148761
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.014...
.

Possibly, the results of the PNS on the self-report of exposure to chemicals will be valuable information for the health surveillance systems of workers, besides providing clues to the investigations on risk factors for the burden of chronic-degenerative diseases. Finally, our results reinforce previous indications regarding the relevance of considering the characteristics of employment and work in the programs aimed at smoking cessation in the population3232. Chin DL, Hong O, Gillen M, Bates MN, Okechukwu CA. Cigarette smoking in building trades workers: the impact of work environment. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(5):429-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22031
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22031...
.

CONCLUSIONS

Although possibly underestimated, the occurrence of self-reported exposure to chemical substances in the study was high. Except for the absence of association with asthma or asthmatic bronchitis, in which coverage problems should be considered, the positive associations with tiredness, hearing difficulties, work accidents and smoking are consistent, as well as the inverse association with the level of education and gender differences. Despite being in convergence with a panorama recently described in the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, the information bias according to the content and format of the issue that guided the construction of the main variable limits the interpretation of the results. We suggested the improvement of the PNS collection instrument in the occupational dimension to fill gaps in investigations on chronic non-communicable diseases.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Malta DC, Felisbino-Mendes MS, Machado IE, Passos VMA, Abreu DMX, Ishitani LH, et al. Fatores de risco relacionados à carga global de doença do Brasil e Unidades Federadas, 2015. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017;20 Supl 1:217-32. http://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201700050018
    » http://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201700050018
  • 2
    Levy L. Chemical hazards in the workplace: an overview. Occup Med (Lond). 2004;54(2):67-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh017
  • 3
    United Nations Environment Programme. Global chemicals outlook: towards sound management of chemicals. Nairobi (KEN): UNEP; 2013 [cited 2018 Apr 21]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=1966&menu=35
    » https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=1966&menu=35
  • 4
    Hutter HP, Kundi M, Lemmerer K, Poteser M, Weitensfelder L, Wallner P, et al. Subjective symptoms of male workers linked to occupational pesticide exposure on coffee plantations in the Jarabacoa Region, Dominican Republic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102099
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102099
  • 5
    Sadhra SS, Kurmi OP, Chambers H, Lam KBH, Fishwick D; The Occupational COPD Research Group. Development of an occupational airborne chemical exposure matrix. Occup Med (Lond). 2016;66(5):358-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw027
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw027
  • 6
    Azevedo e Silva G, Moura L, Curado MP, Gomes FS, Otero U, Rezende LFM, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to ways of life, infections, occupation, and environmental agents in Brazil in 2020. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148761
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148761
  • 7
    Kalleberg AL. Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. Am Sociol Rev. 2009;74(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
  • 8
    Schulte PA, Pana-Cryan R, Schnorr T, Schill AL, Guerin R, Felknor S, et al. An approach to assess the burden of work-related injury, disease, and distress. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(7):1051-7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303765
    » https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303765
  • 9
    Otero UB, Mello MSC. Fração atribuível a fatores de risco ocupacionais para câncer no Brasil: evidências e limitações. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2016;62(1):43-5.
  • 10
    Castro TGM, Lima EP, Assunção AA. Panorama dos inquéritos ocupacionais no Brasil (2005-2015): uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019;24(8):2923-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.18042017
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.18042017
  • 11
    Weiler A. Working conditions surveys: a comparative analysis: report. Dublin (IRL): European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions; 2007 [citado 17 jan 2019]. Diponível em: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2007/working-conditions/working-conditions-surveys-a-comparative-analysis
    » https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2007/working-conditions/working-conditions-surveys-a-comparative-analysis
  • 12
    Sabastizagal I, Vives A, Astete J, Burgos M, Gimeno-Ruiz de Porras D, Benavides FG. Fiabilidad y cumplimiento de las preguntas sobre condiciones de trabajo incluidas en el cuestionario CTESLAC: resultados del Estudio sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Seguridad y Salud en Perú. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2018;21(4):196-202.
  • 13
    Malta DC, Leal MC, Costa MFL, Morais Neto OL. Inquéritos Nacionais de Saúde: experiência acumulada e proposta para o inquérito de saúde brasileiro. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2008;11 Supl 1:159-67. https:/doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2008000500017
    » https:/doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2008000500017
  • 14
    Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas: Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2014 [cited 2018 Jan 17]. Available from: ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/PNS/2013/pns2013.pdf
    » ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/PNS/2013/pns2013.pdf
  • 15
    Benavides FG, Merino-Salazar P, Cornelio C, Assunção AA, Agudelo-Suárez AA, Amable M, et al. Cuestionario básico y criterios metodológicos para las Encuestas sobre Condiciones de Trabajo, Empleo y Salud en América Latina y el Caribe. Cad Saude Publica. 2016;32(9):e00210715. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00210715
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00210715
  • 16
    Macinko J, Mullachery P, Silver D, Jimenez G, Morais Neto OL. Patterns of alcohol consumption and related behaviors in Brazil: evidence from the 2013 National Health Survey (PNS 2013). PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0134153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134153
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134153
  • 17
    Mullachery P, Silver D, Macinko J. Changes in health care inequity in Brazil between 2008 and 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0431-8
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0431-8
  • 18
    Lotufo PA. Cardiovascular diseases in Brazil: premature mortality, risk factors and priorities for action. Comments on the preliminary results from the Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS), 2013. Sao Paulo Med J. 2015;133(2):69-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2015.13320018
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2015.13320018
  • 19
    Souza-Júnior PRB, Freitas MPS, Antonaci GA, Szwarcwald CL. Desenho da amostra da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2015;24(2):207-16. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200003
    » https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200003
  • 20
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Hartman C, Stoddard AM, Quinn MM, et al. The inverse hazard law: blood pressure, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, workplace abuse and occupational exposures in US low-income black, white and Latino workers. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):1970-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.039
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.039
  • 21
    Vincent R. Les produits chimiques au travail: des risques souvent ignorés. Hyg Secur Travail. 2015;238:22-5.
  • 22
    Benavides FG, López-Ruiz M, Rojas M, Herrera MSP, Chavarría J, Cornelio C, et al. Informe de salud ocupacional en América Latina y el Caribe, brechas de desigualdad en la salud de las personas que trabajan. Heredia (CRI): Saltra/ IRET-UNA; 2018.
  • 23
    Messing K, Stellman JM. Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: the importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res. 2006;101(2):149-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.03.015
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.03.015
  • 24
    Saboia, J. Descentralização industrial no Brasil na década de noventa: um processo dinâmico e diferenciado regionalmente. Nova Econ. 2009;11(2):85-122.
  • 25
    Kubrusly LS. A população ocupada e a renda no Brasil: encontros e desencontros. Econ Soc. 2011;20(3):567-600. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-06182011000300005
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-06182011000300005
  • 26
    Guida HL, Morini RG, Cardoso ACV. Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida. Braz J Othorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(4):423-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
  • 27
    Sexton K, Linder SH. Cumulative risk assessment for combined health effects from chemical and nonchemical stressors. Am J Public Health. 2011;101 Suppl 1:S81-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300118
    » https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300118
  • 28
    Das-Munshi J, Rubin GJ, Wessely S. Multiple chemical sensitivities: A systematic review of provocation studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(6):1257-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.046
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.046
  • 29
    Mandiracioglu A, Akgur S, Kocabiyik N, Sener U. Evaluation of neuropsychological symptoms and exposure to benzene, toluene and xylene among two different furniture worker groups in Izmir. Toxicol Ind Health. 2011;27(9):802-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711399309
  • 30
    Lemière C, Boulet LP, Chaboillez S, Forget A, Chiry S, Villeneuve H, et al. Work-exacerbated asthma and occupational asthma: do they really differ? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(3):704-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.024
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.024
  • 31
    Naimi AI, Richardson DB, Cole SR. Causal inference in occupational epidemiology: accounting for the healthy worker effect by using structural nested models. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(12):681-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt215
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt215
  • 32
    Chin DL, Hong O, Gillen M, Bates MN, Okechukwu CA. Cigarette smoking in building trades workers: the impact of work environment. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(5):429-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22031
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22031
  • 33
    Malta DC, Vieira ML, Szwarcwald CL, Caixeta R, Brito SMF, Reis AAC.. Tendência de fumantes na população Brasileira segundo a Pesquisa Nacional de Amostra de Domicílios 2008 e a Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;18 Supl 2:45-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500060005
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500060005
  • 34
    Merino-Salazar P, Artazcoz L, Campos-Serna J, Gimeno D, Benavides FG. National working conditions surveys in Latin America: comparison of methodological characteristics. Int J Occup Environl Health. 2015;21(3):266-74. https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396715Y.0000000004
    » https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396715Y.0000000004
  • 35
    Hoppin JA, Yucel F, Dosemeci M, Sandler DP. Accuracy of self-reported pesticide use duration information from licensed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. J Exp Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002;12(5):313-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500232
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500232
  • Funding

    FAPEMIG – Pesquisador Mineiro Program PPM-00499-16.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    04 Sept 2020
  • Date of issue
    2020

History

  • Received
    17 Jan 2019
  • Accepted
    7 Aug 2019
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo Avenida Dr. Arnaldo, 715, 01246-904 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel./Fax: +55 11 3061-7985 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revsp@usp.br