SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 issue6Cerebral mass lesion due to cytomegalovirus in a patient with AIDS: case report and literature reviewVenomous animals in Brazil: biology, clinic and therapeutics of envenomations author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo

Print version ISSN 0036-4665

Rev. Inst. Med. trop. S. Paulo vol.45 no.6 São Paulo Nov./Dec. 2003

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652003000600008 

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

 

Comparison between immunomagnetic separation, coupled with immunofluorescence, and the techniques of Faust et al. and of Lutz for the diagnosis of Giardia lamblia cysts in human feces

 

Comparação entre a imuno-separação magnética, acoplada à imunofluorescência, e as técnicas de Faust et al. e de Lutz para o diagnóstico de cistos de Giardia lamblia em fezes humanas

 

 

Doris Sobral Marques SouzaI; Juliana Teixeira BarreirosII; Karina Maria PappII; Mário SteindelIII; Cláudia Maria Oliveira SimõesIV; Célia Regina Monte BarardiIII

IMestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), SC, Brasil
IIAcadêmicas da 6ª Fase da Graduação em Medicina da UFSC, SC, Brasil
IIILaboratório de Virologia Aplicada MIP/CCB. UFSC, SC, Brasil
IVDepartamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas CIF/CCS, SC, Brasil

Correspondence

 

 


SUMMARY

In the present study, the performance of Immunomagnetic Separation technique, coupled with Immunofluorescence (IMS-IFA), was compared with the FAUST et al. and Lutz parasitological techniques for the detection of Giardia lamblia cysts in human feces.
One hundred and twenty-seven samples were evaluated by the three techniques at the same time showing a rate of cyst detection of 27.5% by IMS-IFA and 15.7% by both Faust et al. and Lutz techniques. Data analysis showed a higher sensitivity of IMS-IFA for the detection of G. lamblia cysts in comparison with the techniques of FAUST et al. and Lutz.
The use of this methodology as a routine procedure enables the processing of many samples simultaneously, in order to increase recovery rate of G. lamblia cysts and reduce the time of sample storage.

KEYWORDS: Giardia lamblia; Giardiasis; Cryptosporidium; Immunomagnetic separation technique; Diagnosis.


RESUMO

No presente trabalho, o desempenho da técnica de Imunoseparação Magnética, acoplada à Imunofluorescência (IMS-IFA), foi comparado com aqueles das técnicas parasitológicas de FAUST et al. e de Lutz na detecção de cistos de Giardia lamblia em fezes humanas. Foram processadas 127 amostras de fezes pelas três técnicas paralelamente e a detecção de cistos foi de 27,5% para IMS-IFA e de 15,7% para as técnicas de FAUST et al. e de Lutz concomitantemente. A análise dos resultados mostrou maior sensibilidade da IMS-IFA na detecção de cistos de G. lamblia quando comparada aos métodos de FAUST et al. e Lutz.
A utilização desta metodologia como procedimento de rotina proporciona o processamento de várias amostras simultaneamente, além de aumentar a recuperação de cistos de G. lamblia e reduzir o tempo de estocagem das amostras.


 

 

Giardia is a flagellated intestinal protozoan parasite, responsible for causing disease in various animal species including humans. Considered the most common intestinal pathogen worldwide7, Giardia lamblia (syn.: Giardia intestinalis and Lamblia intestinalis) presents two forms: trophozoite and cyst during its biological cycle. Giardia infection occurs by the fecal-oral route through the ingestion of water or food contaminated with cysts4. The general estimated prevalence of giardiasis among children in Brazil is 28.5% in various geographic areas1; in some environments, such as nurseries schools, orphanages, hospital wards, etc, its prevalence can be still higher7. In both symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers cyst elimination is not continuous, but may last for long periods7.

Laboratory diagnosis for Giardia is based on stool processing by different techniques and light microscope examination. Examination of fresh diarrheal specimens is useful for trophozoite detection whereas the centrifuge-flotation methods (Faust et al., Sheather, etc.) or centrifuge-sedimentation (Ritchie) are more adequate for cyst detection. The smears can be stained by Lugol's iodine or iron hematoxylin2. Antibody and antigen detection, by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), is also used for diagnosis in humans, as well as the detection of the parasites in water samples10.

Immunomagnetic Separation coupled with Immunofluorescence (IMS-IFA), is a technique based on the use of magnetic beads conjugated to specific monoclonal antibodies against the cell surface markers of bacteria, protozoa, etc. Immunomagnetic separation accomplishes the isolation of these specific structures from their environment: water, feces, mud, etc, while IFA can confirm the identification of the isolated structures3,8,9,14. The IMS-IFA technique has been used in tests for Giardia spp. cysts and Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in environmental samples in our laboratory5. This technique was previously standardized for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp. diagnosis in human feces. This was performed by seeding the feces with an internal sample control, that consisted of C. parvum oocysts and G. lamblia cysts (99 ± 1 of each) labeled with Texas Red® (ColorSeed®, BTF Pty Ltd., Australia). This procedure allows artificially seeded oocysts and cysts to be distinguished, from those belonging to the sample. Since no significant differences between the recovery average of the two parasites in chi-square analysis11 were observed, the final option was to use an "external control" that consisted of a suspension of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (donated by Dr. Duncan Veal from Macquarie University, NSW, Australia — 105 oocysts/mL), prepared in the laboratory, as this was less expensive than the former.

The aim of this study was to compare the IMS-IFA technique with Faust et al. and Lutz techniques2 for the detection of G. lamblia cysts in human feces. This study received approval from the Ethical Committee of Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, SC (Nº 005/2001).

One hundred and twenty-seven stool samples were obtained from children (one per child), between 2 and 12 years old, from a nursery school, Alfa Gente Vila Aparecida (77 samples), and from two hospitals, Hospital Infantil and Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (50 samples), in Florianópolis, State of Santa Catarina. Feces were fixed in formalin-sodium acetate-acetic acid (SAF) in a proportion of 1:5 feces/SAF and stored at room temperature (20 °C) for no longer than 4 months. Stool samples were processed by Faust et al. and Lutz methods2, by three students under the supervision of the responsible teacher, for cysts detection using standard protocols according to DE CARLI and by IMS-IFA technique as described by GREINERT (2001).

The magnetic beads (BIOMAG® - Polyscience Inc, Warrington, USA) used in this study were composed of approximately 1 µm (diameter) magnetic particles consisting of an iron oxide core with a silane coating. They are also commercially available with goat anti-mouse IgG covalently attached and were conjugated with specific monoclonal antibodies (Mab) at the laboratory. Briefly, magnetic beads were washed twice in 6 mL tubes in Bead Buffer (PBS added with 1% (w/v) BSA, 0.1% (w/v) SDS and 0.05% (w/v) Sodium Azide). The beads were incubated with hybridoma supernatants, for 16 hours in an orbital shaker (Mini-rotator, Glass-Col®) at 4 °C. These hybridoma supernatants contained Mab, raised against either the walls of Giardia spp. cysts (Mab G203) or the walls of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts (CRY104). Mab G203 and CRY104 were generously donated by Dr. Duncan Veal from Environmental Pathogens Lab, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia (3.0 mL of cell supernatants and 3.0 mL of Bead Buffer). Afterwards, the tubes were placed in an adequate rack, containing a magnet. The supernatant was discarded and the beads were resuspended in 6.0 mL of Bead Buffer and stored at 4 °C.

For IMS-IFA assay (that was performed by one person, but the membrane examination under the microscope was performed by two different people) 1 mL of formalin-fixed human stool was suspended in two centrifuge tubes (tubes 1 and 2) containing 7 mL of Bead Buffer. In one of the tubes (tube 2), 10 µL of the standard Cryptosporidium oocyst suspension was added (positive-control). Tubes were vortexed for 30 sec and left on the bench for 40 min for spontaneous sedimentation. Thereafter, each supernatant was transferred to a 6 mL capacity tube, and then 200 µL of Magnetic Beads, coupled with G203 (tube 1) or CRY104 (tube 2), was added. The suspensions were incubated in an orbital shaker, for 30 minutes, and transferred to the magnet-containing rack, for bead separation during 15 minutes. These supernatants were transferred to two fresh tubes (1' and 2') and returned to the magnet-containing rack to ensure that all the magnetic beads were captured. After the two-step capture procedure and supernatant discarding, the beads were washed in 4 mL of Bead Buffer, resuspended in 4 mL of 0.1M glycine buffer, pH 2.2, and vortexed for two minutes. The suspension was agitated in orbital shaker for 15 min (acid dissociation), and finally placed on the magnetic shelf for Magnetic Bead capture for five minutes. Each supernatant containing either cysts or oocysts was filtrated through two 8 µm Nucleopore® Membranes, (Whatman, New Jersey, USA) and the cysts or oocysts incubated for 5 min with 100 µL of anti-mouse IgG coupled with FITC (Sigma Inc, USA) 1:100 dilution in Bead Buffer (Fig. 1).

 

 

The membranes were covered with a slide glass and examined in a BX-40 FLA (Olympus®) fluorescence microscope (200 X and 400 X) for the presence of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts. For the seeded samples, the number of oocysts was counted in order to calculate the cyst recovery rate (Fig. 2). Data were analyzed by the Chi-square test (c2).

 

 

IMS-IFA analysis of the 127 processed stool samples resulted in 35 (27.6%) positive samples of G. lamblia cysts and 92 negative samples. Using standard Faust et al. and Lutz methods2, 20 samples (15.7%) were positive and 107 were negative. Twenty out of the 35 positive IMS-IFA samples, were confirmed by both Faust et al. and Lutz methods2 (Table 1).

 

 

IMS-IFA proved to be a very sensitive and specific technique for G. lamblia cyst detection when compared with the standard Faust et al. and Lutz methods2 (c2 = 5.22, GL = 1, p < 0.05). In addition, the labeled cysts are very bright, turning their visualization easier thereby avoiding misinterpretations, since some artifacts can interfere in the correct evaluation because the cysts are small and the amount of debris is usually large. This paper reports for the first time the use of IMS-IFA technique for the detection of G. lamblia cysts or Cryptosporidium oocysts in human feces. IMS-IFA has been successfully used to detect Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in both environmental samples and bovine feces5,8,9,14. Since the standardization of this methodology for human stool samples, in our laboratory, showed no differences in the rates of either cyst or oocyst recovery, positive controls were seeded only with Cryptosporidium oocysts.

According to WEBER et al.12, the limit of oocyst recovery in seeded human stool was 104 oocysts/mL using the formalin-ethyl-acetate technique even in diarrheic stool samples, where the oocyst count is usually higher. The threshold of Cryptosporidium spp. oocyst recovery in seeded bovine feces was 104 oocysts/g of feces using the Ritchie technique and 4 x 103 oocysts/g of feces for the Sheater method13. On the other hand, in calf feces (which are more fatty than adult stool) seeded with 2 x 103 oocysts/g of feces, the average rate for oocyst recovery was 3.6 ± 1.0 oocysts using the Faust method6. During the standardization of IMS-IFA methodology for human stool in our laboratory, seeded samples with 102 and 103 oocysts/g reached a rate of oocyst recovery of 4.7% and 8.5% respectively11. These results were 20% better than the oocyst recovery from calf stool using the Faust et al. method, as reported by KUCZYNSKA & SHELTON6.

Although IMS-IFA was shown to be more sensitive than Faust et al.2 and Lutz methods, it is more costly. Consequently it is necessary to evaluate the advantage of its use and find ways of reducing costs. The use of this methodology as a routine procedure enables the processing of many samples simultaneously, in order to increase recoveries and reduce the time of sample storage6.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Maurício Sedrez dos Reis (Departamento de Fitotecnia/CCA, UFSC) for his assistance with the statistic analysis.

 

REFERENCES

1. CIMERMAN, B. & CIMERMAN, S. - Parasitologia humana e seus fundamentos. São Paulo, Atheneu, 1999.        [ Links ]

2. DE CARLI, G.A. - Diagnóstico laboratorial das parasitoses humanas. Métodos e técnicas. Rio de Janeiro, Medsi, 1994.        [ Links ]

3. DI GIOVANNI, G.D.; HASHEMI, F.H.; SHAW, N.J. et al. - Detection of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in surface and filter backwash water samples by immunomagnetic separation and integrated cell culture-PCR. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 65: 3427-3432, 1999.        [ Links ]

4. DORSCH, M.R. & VEAL, D.A. - Oligonucleotide probes for specific detection of Giardia lamblia cysts by fluorescent in situ hybridization. J. appl. Microbiol., 90: 836-842, 2001.        [ Links ]

5. GREINERT, J.A. - Avaliação de técnicas para detecção e quantificação de Giardia spp. e Cryptosporidium spp. em água de piscina. Florianópolis, 2001. (Dissertação de Mestrado - Centro de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina).        [ Links ]

6. KUCZYNSKA, E. & SHELTON, D.R. - Method for detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in feces, manures and soils. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 65: 2820-2826, 1999.        [ Links ]

7. NEWMAN, R.D.; MOORE, S.R.; LIMA, A.A.M. et al. - A longitudinal study of Giardia lamblia infection in North-East Brazilian children. Trop. Med. Int. Hlth., 6: 624-634, 2001.        [ Links ]

8. PEREIRA, M.D.C.; ATWILL, E.R. & JONES, T. - Comparison of sensitivity of immunofluorescent microscopy to that of a combination of immunofluorescent microscopy and immunomagnetic separation for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in adult bovine feces. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 65: 3236-3239, 1999.        [ Links ]

9. ROCHELLE, P.A.; DE LEON, R.; JOHNSON, A.; STEWART, M.H. & WOLFE, R.L. - Evaluation of immunomagnetic separation for recovery of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from environmental samples Appl. environ. Microbiol., 65: 841-845, 1999.        [ Links ]

10. SOGAYAR, M.I.T.L. & GUIMARÃES, S. - Giardia lamblia. In: NEVES, D.P.; MELO, A.L.; GENARO, O. & GINARD, P.M., ed. Parasitologia humana. 10..ed. São Paulo, Atheneu, 2000. p. 107-113.        [ Links ]

11. SOUZA, D.S.M. - Avaliação de técnicas de diagnóstico de Cryptosporidium spp. e Giardia lamblia em fezes humanas. Florianópolis, 2002. (Dissertação de Mestrado - Centro de Ciência da Saúde da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina).        [ Links ]

12. WEBER, R.L; BRYAN, R.T.; BISHOP, H.S. et al. - Threshold of detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in human stool specimens: evidence for low sensitivity of current diagnostic methods. J. clin. Microbiol., 29: 1323-1327, 1991.        [ Links ]

13. WEBSTER, K.A.; SMITH, H.V.; GILES, M.; DAWSON, L. & ROBERTSON, L.J. - Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in faeces: comparison of conventional coproscopical methods and the polymerase chain reaction. Vet. Parasit., 61: 5-13, 1996.        [ Links ]

14. YAKUB, G.P. & STADTERMAN-KNAUER, K.L. - Evaluation of immunomagnetic separation for recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis from high-iron matrices. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 66: 3628-3631, 2000.        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to
Drª Célia R.M. Barardi
Laboratório de Virologia Aplicada, MIP, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
88040-900 Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
Phone: +55.48.331-5207
Fax: + 55.48.331-9258
E-mail: ccb1crb@ccb.ufsc.br

Received: 8 April 2003
Accepted: 21 October 2003