SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



  • text new page (beta)
  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation


Related links


Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo

On-line version ISSN 1678-9946

Rev. Inst. Med. trop. S. Paulo vol.55 no.5 São Paulo Sept./Oct. 2013 



Investigação sorológica de espécies de Ehrlichia em cães, equinos e humanos de um assentamento rural do sul do Brasil

Rafael Felipe da Costa Vieira(1)  (2) 

Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme Vieira(2) 

Denise do Amaral Gomes Nascimento(2) 

Thiago F. Martins(3) 

Felipe S. Krawczak(3) 

Marcelo B. Labruna(3) 

Ramaswamy Chandrashekar(4) 

Mary Marcondes(5) 

Alexander Welker Biondo(6)   

Odilon Vidotto(2) 

(1)Departmento de Ciências Veterinárias, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Bairro Universitário, 58397-000 Areia, Paraíba, Brazil.

(2)Departmento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, 86051-990, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil

(3)Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, FMVZ, Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-270, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

(4)IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME, USA

(5)Departmento de Clínica, Cirurgia e Reprodução Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 16050-680, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil

(6)Departmento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Departmento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Rua dos Funcionários 1540, 80035-050 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil and Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Illinois, IL, 61802, USA.



The aims of this study were to determine the seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp. and risk factors for exposure in a restricted population of dogs, horses, and humans highly exposed to tick bites in a Brazilian rural settlement using a commercial ELISA rapid test and two indirect immunofluorescent assays (IFA) with E. canis and E. chaffeensis crude antigens. Serum samples from 132 dogs, 16 horses and 100 humans were used. Fifty-six out of 132 (42.4%) dogs were seropositive for E. canis. Dogs > one year were more likely to be seropositive for E. canis than dogs ≤ one year (p = 0.0051). Ten/16 (62.5%) and 8/16 (50%) horses were seropositive by the commercial ELISA and IFA, respectively. Five out of 100 (5%) humans were seropositive for E. canis and E. chaffeensis. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (n = 291, 97.98%) on dogs and Amblyomma cajennense (n = 25, 96.15%) on horses were the most common ticks found. In conclusion, anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies were found in horses; however, the lack of a molecular characterization precludes any conclusion regarding the agent involved. Additionally, the higher seroprevalence of E. canis in dogs and the evidence of anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies in humans suggest that human cases of ehrlichiosis in Brazil might be caused by E. canis, or other closely related species.

Key words: Ehrlichia canis; Ehrlichia chaffeensis; IFA; ELISA



Objetivou-se determinar a soroprevalência de Ehrlichia spp. e os fatores de risco associados a exposição em uma população restrita de cães, cavalos e humanos altamente expostos a picadas de carrapatos em um assentamento rural brasileiro utilizando um teste comercial de ELISA rápido e dois testes de imunofluorescência indireta (IFI) com antígenos brutos de E. canis e E. chaffeensis. Amostras de soro de 132 cães, 16 cavalos e 100 humanos foram utilizadas. Cinquenta e seis/132 (42,4%) cães foram soropositivos para E. canis. Cães > um ano apresentaram mais chance de serem soropositivos para E. canis do que cães ≤ um ano (p = 0,0051). Dez/16 (62,5%) e 8/16 (50%) cavalos foram soropositivos pelo ELISA comercial e IFI, respectivamente. Cinco/100 (5%) humanos foram soropositivos para E. canis e E. chaffeensis. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (n = 291, 97,98%) nos cães e A. cajennense (n = 25, 96,15%) nos cavalos foram os carrapatos mais encontrados. Concluindo, anticorpos anti-Ehrlichia spp. foram encontrados em cavalos; entretanto, a ausência de uma caracterização molecular impede qualquer conclusão sobre agente envolvido. Além disso, a alta soroprevalência de E. canis em cães e a evidência de anticorpos anti-Ehrlichia sp. em humanos, sugere que os casos de erliquiose humana no Brasil possam ser causados por E. canis ou outra espécie intimamente relacionada.


Ehrlichiosis is a tick-borne disease caused by Ehrlichia spp. that affects animals and humans worldwide9 27 39 54. The disease is historically endemic in tropical and subtropical regions and has increasingly been recognized, not only in traditionally endemic areas, but also in temperate regions25. This may be attributed to several factors, including the improved diagnostic tools, and both environmental and climate changes which directly influences the distribution of ticks24.

In some regions of Brazil, dogs and horses are frequently exposed to ticks29 30. Dogs and humans are exposed and susceptible to infection by many of the very same tick-borne bacterial pathogens in the order Rickettsiales, including Ehrlichia spp.24. Ehrlichia canis is the causative agent of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis and is the main Ehrlichia species present in dogs in Brazil54. Additionally, E. canis DNA was also amplified from the blood of six human patients with clinical signs of human monocytic ehrlichiosis in Venezuela, suggesting that E. canis can also be associated with clinical manifestation in humans44.

In humans there are two recognized diseases to date caused by Ehrlichia species; human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME), caused by Ehrlichia chaffeensis; and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) due to Ehrlichia ewingii 41. Human ehrlichiosis cases have been serologically identified in Brazil since 19806 11 12; however, the Ehrlichia species associated with these cases were not identified. Additional cases of human ehrlichiosis have been serologically diagnosed in other South American countries, including Argentina45, Chile31, Peru38 and Venezuela43 44.

Equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (EME), caused by Neorickettsia risticii (formerly E. risticii), and equine granulocytic anaplasmosis (EGA) caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum (formerly E. equi) are the two recognized diseases caused by ehrlichial species16. Ticks have never been implicated in the transmission of N. risticii 3 16, whereas ticks belonging to the Ixodes genus are the vectors of A. phagocytophilum 56. While clinical cases of EME have been reported in southern and southeastern regions of Brazil10 17 18, horses serologically reactive to A. phagocytophilum were reported with clinical alterations in the central-west region of the country48.

The increasing number of people living in rural settlements in Brazil, with poor-resources and precarious living conditions, inadequate sanitary care, and sanitary education, associated to the presence of pets, production animals, wild animals, and ticks sharing the same environment, may represent an important source of several zoonotic pathogens. Thus, the aims of the present study were to i) determine the seroprevalence of Ehrlichia species in a restricted population of dogs, horses, and humans highly exposed to tick bites, ii) identify the tick species parasitizing dogs and horses, and iii) determine risk factors for exposure in a rural settlement from Paraná State, southern Brazil.


Ethical principles: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Animal Experimentation and Animal Welfare at Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) (protocol number 34/2011), and was conducted according to the ethical principles of animal experimentation, adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation. Collection of human blood samples was approved by the Ethics Committee on Human Research at UEL (protocol number 53/2011).

Area:The rural settlement is located in Alvorada do Sul county (22° 54′ 34.4″ S 51° 13′ 49.1″ W), Paraná State, southern Brazil. The area is located within the rural perimeter of Alvorada do Sul, 16 km from downtown, 380 m above sea level. The region presents a subtropical climate with rainfall throughout the year, with a higher concentration in summer months (average temperature of 25 °C)26.

The region is subdivided in 60 homesteads, each with an area of approximately 12 hectares, amounting to 786 hectares. The main activity of subsistence is the cultivation of grains and vegetables. The area also comprises 20% of a native forest having a diverse fauna, with populations of capuchin monkeys, capybaras, opossums, coatis, and wild canids, as well as a wide variety of birds and fishes. There is a barrage close to the area, where the habitants often fish and bath. This region provides the maintenance of various ticks, to which dogs, horses, and humans are continually exposed.

Study design: According to the seasonal dynamics of adult ticks50 52, samples were collected in March 2011, which represents the end of the summer in the South hemisphere. Sampling was performed house-to-house, comprising all 60 homesteads of the area.

A questionnaire focused on epidemiological aspects was given to each owner. Breed, age, gender of their dogs and horses, and presence or previous contact with ticks were evaluated. The age of the dogs was classified into groups of ≤ one year and > one year. Age, gender and history of previous contact with ticks were also addressed for humans.

Collection of ticks: A total of 297 and 26 tick specimens were collected from dogs and horses, respectively. Ticks were removed and kept in 70% ethanol-labeled tubes in order to identify each host. Ticks were classified according to taxonomic keys2 20 34 42.

Sampling: Dog (n = 132) and horse (n = 16) blood samples (up to 10 mL per individual) were collected by venipuncture of the jugular vein. Blood specimens from human (n = 100) were collected by nurses by venipuncture of the brachial vein. All samples were collected in tubes without anti-coagulant and kept at room temperature (25 °C) until visible clot retraction, centrifuged at 1500 g for five min, and the serum was separated and kept at -20 °C until processing.

Detection of anti-Ehrlichia spp antibodies: Serum samples of 138 dogs and 16 horses were tested for E. canis using a commercial ELISA rapid test (SNAP® 4Dx®, IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The kit also detects antibodies anti-A. phagocytophilum, anti-B. burgdorferi (s.l.), and anti-Dirofilaria immitis antigen.

Anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies in horses and human serum samples were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescent assay (IFA) using E. canis (São Paulo strain) and E. chaffeensis (Arkansas strain) as antigens. Crude antigens were produced by culturing ehrlichiae in DH82 cells, as previously described1 51. IFA was performed with 10 µL of serum samples incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in slides previously seeded with E. canis or E. chaffeensis, washed three times for five min in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), additionally washed by distilled water, then dried at room temperature. Twenty microliters of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 1:800 dilution in PBS with 1% of bovine serum albumin and 1% Evans blue were applied onto the slide. Horse samples were titred with a dilution of 1:1200 of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit anti-horse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Slides were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, three times washed for five min, additionally washed by distilled water, allowed to air dry and subsequently examined using a microscope with a fluorescent light source. Samples were considered positive when reacting with dilution ≥ 1:645 11 19 39. Titers were determined to the largest dilution in which fluorescence was visualized around the bacteria (endpoint titers).

Statistical analysis: The Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used to determine the difference between whether individual factors were associated with seropositivity to Ehrlichia spp. Odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval and p values were calculated separately for each variable. Results were considered significantly different when p < 0.05. Data were compiled and analyzed in Epi Info Software (version 3.5.3).


A total of 132 dogs were sampled, 83 (62.8%) of which were males and 49 (37.2%) females. All were mixed breed, with ages varying from six months to 12 years. By the commercial ELISA rapid test, 56/132 (42.4%; 95%CI: 33.9 - 51.3%) dogs were seropositive for E. canis. Dogs > one year were more likely to be seropositive for E. canis than dogs ≤ one year (OR = 3.13, 95% CI, 1.45 - 6.75%). No significant association was found between gender or presence of ticks, and seropositivity to E. canis. Data on E. canis seroprevalence are shown in Table 1. Additionally, anti-A. phagocytophilum antibodies were found in 3/132 (2.3%; 95% CI: 0.5 - 6.5%) dogs. Anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies and D. immitis antigens were not found in dogs.

Table 1 Seroprevalence of E. canis in dogs within each variable studied from a rural settlement, Paraná State, southern Brazil 

Variable +/N (%) OR 95% CI p-value
Presence of ticks
 Yes 35/73 (47.9%) 1.66 0.82-3.36 0.1534
 No 21/59 (35.6%)
Age (years)
 > 1 43/82 (52.4%) 3.13 1.45-6.75 0.0051
 ≤1 13/50 (26%)
 Male 33/83 (39.8%) 0.74 0.36-1.52 0.4200
 Female 23/49 (46.9%)

+, Number of positive animals; N, number of samples per variable; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Horses included nine (56.2%) males and seven (43.8%) females, all mixed breed, with ages ranging from three to 15 years. When serum samples were evaluated by each test, 10/16 (62.5%; 95% CI: 35.4 - 84.8%) and 8/16 (50%; 95% CI: 24.7 - 75.3%) were positive for E. canis antigen by the commercial ELISA rapid test and IFA, respectively. Ten out of 16 (62.5%; 95% CI: 35.4 - 84.8%) horses were positive for E. chaffeensis antigen. Antibodies titers ranged from 256 to 2048 for E. canis and from 256 to 1024 for E. chaffeensis by IFA. Additionally, antibodies anti-B. burgdorferi were found in 2/16 (12.5%; 95% CI: 1.6 - 38.3%) horses. Antibodies anti-A. phagocytophilum were not found.

Humans included 48 (48%) males and 52 (52%) females, with ages varying from two to 79 years. Five out of 100 (5%; 95% CI: 1.6 - 11.3%) humans were seropositive for E. canis and E. chaffeensis antibodies, respectively. From the total of seropositive samples, two reacted for both agents. Antibodies titers ranged from 64 to 512 for E. canis and from 64 to 256 for E. chaffeensis by IFA. Seventy-five out of 100 (75%) humans recollected having been bitten by ticks. No significant association was found between age, gender or previous exposure to tick bites, and seropositivity to Ehrlichia spp.

Seropositive human samples were: female, 12 years-old, and kept five dogs at home, all seropositive for E. canis; male, 13 years-old, owned a dog seronegative for E. canis; female, 29 years-old, kept two dogs at home, seronegative for E. canis; male, 30 years-old, kept three dogs at home and all were seronegative for E. canis; female, 72 years-old, owned a dog seropositive for E. canis. All humans recalled tick and insect bites, and recollected acute febrile syndromes in the past.

A total of 297 ticks (154 males, 104 females, 34 nymphs and five larvae) were collected from 73/132 (55.3%; 95% CI, 46.4 - 64%) dogs, ranging from one to 26 ticks per animal. Three tick species were identified: Rhipicephalus sanguineus (n = 291, 97.98%), Amblyomma ovale (n = 5, 1.68%) and Amblyomma cajennense (n = 1, 0.34%). From the total of 73 dogs found infested by ticks, 68/73 (93.15%; 95% CI, 84.95 - 97%) were infested by R. sanguineus, 3/73 (4.11%; 95% CI, 1.41 - 11.4%) by A. ovale, and 1/73 (1.37%; 95% CI, 0.24 - 7.36%) by A. ovale and A. cajennense.

Twenty-six ticks (18 males and eight females) were collected from 7/16 (43.7%; 95% CI, 23.1 - 66.8%) horses, ranging from one to nine ticks per animal. Two tick species were identified: A. cajennense (n = 25, 96.15%) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (n = 1, 3.85%). A. cajennense ticks were found infesting 6/7 (85.7%; 95% CI, 48.6 - 97.4%) horses, and R. (B.) microplus in 1/7 (14.3%; 95% CI, 2.5 - 5.1%) horse.


Anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies were found in 62.5% of horses from southern Brazil by using the commercial ELISA rapid test. Despite this test has been developed for screening canine samples8, the assay uses antigen-specific conjugate and was previously validated for screening B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum in horses7 28. Using this same commercial ELISA in horses from Denmark, France, French Guyana and Africa, anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies were not found21 35 36. Previous studies using this point-of-care ELISA assay in dog serum samples reported cross-reactivity between E. canis and E. chaffeensis antibodies40. In the present study, 50% of the horses were positive by IFA using E. canis and E. chaffeensis as antigens. Thus, differences in the number of seropositive horses found by each test were somewhat expected, since the commercial ELISA rapid test utilizes synthetic peptides from p30 and p30-1 outer membrane proteins of E. canis as antigen40, while IFA used E. canis and E. chaffeensis crude antigens.

A weak cross-reactivity between N. risticii and E. canis by IFA, ELISA and Western blot methods has been reported4 23 46 49. Recently developed Western blot tests coupled with serum absorption techniques have been used in order to identify the organisms involved and solve the serological cross-reactivity between these agents22. In the present study, horse antibody endpoint titers ranged from 256 to 2048 for E. canis and from 256 to 1024 for E. chaffeensis by IFA. Moreover, 43.7% of the horses were infested by ticks, in the majority A. cajennense (96.1%). Ehrlichia canis is transmitted through the bite of the brown dog tick R. sanguineus 15, while E. chaffeensis is mainly transmitted by A. americanum ticks55. Neither horse infestations by R. sanguineus nor E. canis infection in Amblyomma ticks are natural host-parasite interactions. In addition, no data are currently available on the vector competence of A. cajennense for E. chaffeensis 55. On the other hand, ticks have never been implicated in the transmission of N. risticii 16, which is transmitted upon ingestion of this bacterium in the metacercarial stage of trematodes encysting in aquatic insects by horses47. Thus, authors did not exclude the possibility on the involvement of a not-yet-described Ehrlichia species in the population of horses herein studied, which should be further molecularly identified and characterized.

IFA is considered the gold standard test for diagnosis of HME, although cross-reactivity between E. canis and E. chaffeensis by serological methods commonly occur54. In the present study, 5% of the humans were seropositive by IFA for either E. canis or E. chaffeensis antigens. Although clinical cases of human ehrlichiosis have been reported in Brazil by using E. chaffeensis antigens6 11 12, the existing cross-reactions between Ehrlichia species in serological assays precluded the determination of the etiological agent of human patients. Although molecular detection of E. chaffeensis DNA has already been related in wildlife in Brazil32 33, E. canis is indeed the most prevalent Ehrlichia species in the country54. Since 75% of humans of the present study reported past tick bites, and R. sanguineus ticks, the main vector of E. canis- were the most common tick species found (90%)- it is possible that anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies detected in this study were due to exposure to E. canis-infected R. sanguineus ticks, although this statement needs to be confirmed by direct detection of the agent in vertebrate blood.

Seropositivity to E. canis was found in 42.4% of the dogs. Serological surveys of E. canis in dogs from rural areas have found prevalence data ranging from 24.7% to 65.6% by different methods37 54. We found that age (> one year-old) is associated with seropositivity to E. canis (p = 0.0051), corroborating with other studies performed in the veterinary teaching hospital in Londrina City, southern Brazil53. Previous studies have reported that male dogs previously exposed to tick bites were at high risk of being seropositive for E. canis 13. In the present study, besides 56.2% of the dogs were males infested by ticks; association between gender or presence of ticks and seropositivity to E. canis was not observed. In addition, previous studies have stated that the commercial ELISA rapid test is able to identify dogs with titers > 32040. Thus, seroprevalence for E. canis in dogs from the studied area might be higher, since dogs with low titers may have not been recognized when a point-of-care ELISA assay is used14.


Antibodies anti-Ehrlichia species were found in horses by two different serological methods. However, the lack of a molecular characterization precludes any conclusion regarding the agent involved. The higher E. canis seroprevalence in dogs and the detection of anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies in humans suggest that human cases of ehrlichiosis in Brazil might be caused by E. canis, or other related species.


This study is part of a PhD degree of Rafael F.C. Vieira at the Universidade Estadual de Londrina. Dr. Vieira was sponsored by a SWE fellowship from the Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) at the time of research. This study was supported by Fundação Araucária do Paraná. The authors thanked IDEXX Laboratories Inc. for providing the SNAP® 4Dx® kits.


1. Aguiar DM, Saito TB, Hagiwara MK, Machado RZ, Labruna MB. Diagnóstico sorológico de erliquiose canina com antígeno brasileiro de Ehrlichia canis. Cienc Rural. 2007;37:796-802. [ Links ]

2. Aragão HB, Fonseca F. Notas de Ixodologia. VIII. Lista e chave para os representantes da fauna ixodológica brasileira. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1961;59:115-29. [ Links ]

3. Barlough JE, Rikihisa Y, Madigan JE. Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia risticii genomic DNA in infected horses. Vet Parasitol. 1997;68:367-73. [ Links ]

4. Brouqui P, Dumler JS, Raoult D, Walker DH. Antigenic characterization of ehrlichiae: protein immunoblotting of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia sennetsu, and Ehrlichia risticii. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:1062-6. [ Links ]

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of viral and rickettsial diseases: indirect fluorescent antibody technique for the detection of rickettsial antibodies. Atlanta: National Center for Infectious Diseases; 2001. [ Links ]

6. Calic SB, Galvão MAM, Bacellar F, Rocha CMBM, Mafra CL, Leite RC, et al. Human ehrlichioses in Brazil: first suspect cases. Braz J Infect Dis. 2004;8:259-62. [ Links ]

7. Chandrashekar R, Daniluk D, Moffitt S, Lorentzen L, Williams J. Serologic diagnosis of equine borreliosis: evaluation of an In-Clinic Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (SNAP® 4Dx®). Int J Appl Res Vet Med. 2008;6:145-50. [ Links ]

8. Chandrashekar R, Mainville CA, Beall MJ, O'Connor T, Eberts MD, Alleman AR, et al. Performance of a commercially available in-clinic ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, and Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis antigen in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2010;71:1443-50. [ Links ]

9. Cocco R, Sanna G, Cillara MG, Tola S, Ximenes L, Pinnaparpaglia ML, et al. Ehrlichiosis and rickettsiosis in a canine population of Northern Sardinia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;990:126-30. [ Links ]

10. Coimbra HS, Fernandes CG, Soares MP, Meireles MCA, Radamés R, Schuch LFD. Ehrlichiose monocítica equina no Rio Grande do Sul: aspectos clínicos, anátomo-patológicos e epidemiológicos. Pesq Vet Bras. 2006;26:97-101. [ Links ]

11. Costa PSG, Brigatte ME, Greco DB. Antibodies to Rickettsia rickettsii, Rickettsia typhi, Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella quintana, and Ehrlichia chaffeensis among healthy population in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100:853-9. [ Links ]

12. Costa PSG, Valle LMC, Brigatte ME, Greco DB. More about human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis in Brazil: serological evidence of nine new cases. Braz J Infect Dis. 2006;10:7-10. [ Links ]

13. Costa LMC Jr, Rembeck K, Ribeiro MFB, Beelitz P, Pfister K, Passos LMF. Seroprevalence and risk indicators for canine ehrlichiosis in three rural areas of Brazil. Vet J. 2007;174:673-6. [ Links ]

14. Couto CG, Lorentzen L, Beall MJ, Shields J, Bertolone N, Couto JI, et al. Serological study of selected vector-borne diseases in shelter dogs in central Spain using point-of-care assays. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:885-8. [ Links ]

15. Dantas-Torres F. Canine vector-borne diseases in Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2008;1:1-25. [ Links ]

16. Dumler JS, Barbet AF, Bekker CPJ, Dasch GA, Palmer GH, Ray SC, et al. Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and ‘HGE agent’ as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51(Pt 6):2145-65. [ Links ]

17. Dutra F, Schuch LFD, Delucchi E, Curcio BR, Coimbra H, Raffi MB, et al. Equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever) in horses in Uruguay and southern Brazil. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2001;13:433-7. [ Links ]

18. Ferrão CN, Aboud-Dutra AE, Lopes RS, Candeias ML, Gazêta GS. Equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (EME) in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2007;59:1575-8. [ Links ]

19. Galvão MAM, Lamounier JA, Bonomo E, Tropia MS, Rezende EG, Calic SB, et al. Rickettsioses emergentes e reemergentes numa região endêmica do estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2002;18:1593-7. [ Links ]

20. Guimarães JH, Tucci EC, Barros-Battesti DM. Ectoparasitas de importância veterinária. São Paulo: Editora Plêiade/FAPESP; 2001. p. 52-104. [ Links ]

21. Hansen MGB, Christoffersen M, Thuesen LR, Petersen MR, Bojesen AM. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Danish horses. Acta Vet Scand. 2010;52:3-6. [ Links ]

22. Harrus S, Waner T. Diagnosis of canine monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): an overview. Vet J. 2011;187:292-6. [ Links ]

23. Holland CJ, Ristic M, Cole AI, Johnson P, Baker G, Goetz T. Isolation, experimental transmission, and characterization of causative agent of Potomac horse fever. Science. 1985;227(4686):522-4. [ Links ]

24. Hunter PR. Climate change and waterborne and vector-borne disease. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(Suppl):37-46. [ Links ]

25. Irwin PJ. Companion animal parasitology: a clinical perspective. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:581-93. [ Links ]

26. INMET. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. [cited May 2012]. Available from: [ Links ]

27. Ismail N, Bloch KC, McBride JW. Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Clin Lab Med. 2010;30:261-92. [ Links ]

28. Johnson AL, Divers TJ, Chang YF. Validation of an in-clinic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for diagnosis of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in horses. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2008;20:321-4. [ Links ]

29. Labruna MB, Pereira MC. Carrapato em cães no Brasil. Clin Vet. 2001;6(30):24-32. [ Links ]

30. Labruna MB, Kerber CE, Ferreira F, Faccini JLH, De Waal DT, Gennari SM. Risk factors to tick infestations and their occurrence on horses in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2001;97:1-14. [ Links ]

31. López J, Rivera M, Concha JC, Gatica S, Loeffeholz M, Barriga O. Ehrlichiosis humana en Chile, evidencia serológica. Rev Med Chil. 2003;131:67-70. [ Links ]

32. Machado RZ, André MR, Werther K, de Sousa E, Gavioli FA, Alves Junior JR. Migratory and carnivorous birds in Brazil: reservoirs for Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species? Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12(8):705-8. [ Links ]

33. Machado RZ, Duarte JMB, Dagnone AS, Szabó MPJ. Detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis in Brazilian marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus). Vet Parasitol. 2006;139:262-6. [ Links ]

34. Martins TF, Onofrio VC, Barros-Battesti DM, Labruna MB. Nymphs of the genus Amblyomma (Acari: Ixodidae) of Brazil: descriptions, redescriptions, and identification key. Ticks Tick-borne Dis. 2010;1:75-99. [ Links ]

35. Maurizi L, Marié JL, Aoun O, Courtin C, Gorsane S, Chal D, et al. Seroprevalence survey of equine lyme borreliosis in France and Sub-Saharan Africa. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:535-7. [ Links ]

36. Maurizi L, Marié JL, Courtin C, Gorsani S, Chal D, Davoust B. Seroprevalence survey of equine anaplasmosis in France and Sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;15(Suppl 2):68-9. [ Links ]

37. Melo ALT, Martins TF, Horta MC, Moraes-Filho J, Pacheco RC, Labruna MB, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors to Ehrlichia spp. and Rickettsia spp. in dogs from the Pantanal Region of Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2011;2:213-8. [ Links ]

38. Moro PL, Shah J, Li O, Gilman RH, Harris N, Moro MH. Short report: serologic evidence of human ehrlichiosis in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:242-4. [ Links ]

39. Ndip LM, Labruna M, Ndip RN, Walker DH, McBride JW. Molecular and clinical evidence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection in Cameroonian patients with undifferentiated febrile illness. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009;103:719-25. [ Links ]

40. O'Connor TP, Hanscom JL, Hegarty BC, Groat RG, Breitschwerdt EB. Comparison of an indirect immunofluorescence assay, Western blot analysis, and a commercially available ELISA for detection of Ehrlichia canis antibodies in canine sera. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67:206-10. [ Links ]

41. Olano JP, Walker DH. Human ehrlichioses. Med Clin North Am. 2002;86:375-92. [ Links ]

42. Onofrio VC, Barros-Battesti DM, Labruna MB, Faccini JL. Diagnoses of and illustrated key to the species of Ixodes Latreille, 1795 (Acari: Ixodidae) from Brazil. Syst Parasitol. 2009;72:143-57. [ Links ]

43. Perez M, Rikihisa Y, Wen B. Ehrlichia canis-like agent isolated from a man in Venezuela: antigenic and genetic characterization. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2133-9. [ Links ]

44. Perez M, Bodor M, Zhang C, Xiong Q, Rikihisa Y. Human infection with Ehrlichia canis accompanied by clinical signs in Venezuela. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1078:110-7. [ Links ]

45. Ripoll CM, Remondegui CE, Ordonez G, Arazamendi R, Fusaro H, Hyman MJ, et al. Evidence of rickettsial spotted fever and ehrlichial infections in a subtropical territory of Jujuy, Argentina. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:350-4. [ Links ]

46. Rikihisa Y. Cross-reacting antigens between Neorickettsia helmithoeca and Ehrlichia species, shown by immunofluorescence and Western immunoblotting. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2024-9. [ Links ]

47. Rikihisa Y, Dumler JS, Dasch GA. Neorickettsia. In: Brenner DJ, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. The Proteobacteria, Part C, Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 132-7. [ Links ]

48. Salvagni CA, Dagnone AS, Gomes TS, Mota JS, Andrade GM, Baldani CD, et al. Serologic evidence of equine granulocytic anaplasmosis in horses from Central West Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2010;19:135-40. [ Links ]

49. Shankarappa B, Dutta SK, Mattingly-Napier Bl. Antigenic and genomic relatedness among Ehrlichia risticii, Ehrlichia sennetsu, and Ehrlichia canis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:127-32. [ Links ]

50. Silveira JA, Passos LM, Ribeiro MF. Population dynamics of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latrielle, 1806) in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2009;161:270-5. [ Links ]

51. Souza BMPS, Leal DC, Barboza DCPM, Uzêda RS, De Alcântara AC, Ferreira F, et al. Prevalence of ehrlichial infection among dogs and ticks in Northeastern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2010;19:89-93. [ Links ]

52. Toledo RS, Tamekuni K, Haydu VB, Vidotto O. Dinâmica sazonal de carrapatos do gênero Amblyomma (Acari: Ixodidae) em um parque urbano da cidade de Londrina, PR. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2008;17(Suppl 1):50-4. [ Links ]

53. Trapp SM, Dagnone AS, Vidotto O, Freire RL, Amude AM, Morais HS. Seroepidemiology of canine babesiosis and ehrlichiosis in a hospital population. Vet Parasitol. 2006;140(3/4):223-30. [ Links ]

54. Vieira RFC, Biondo AW, Guimarães AMS, Santos AP, Santo RP, Dutra LH, et al. Ehrlichiosis in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2011;20:1-12. [ Links ]

55. Yabsley MJ. Natural history of Ehrlichia chaffeensis: vertebrate hosts and tick vectors from the United States and evidence for endemic transmission in other countries. Vet Parasitol. 2010;167:136-48. [ Links ]

56. Woldehiwet Z. The natural history of Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Vet Parasitol. 2010;167(2-4):108-22. [ Links ]

Conflict of InterestThe authors have declared that there are no conflicting interests.

Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: RFC Vieira, TSWJ Vieira, AW Biondo, O Vidotto. Performed the experiments: RFC Vieira, TSWJ Vieira, DAG Nascimento, TF Martins, FS Krawczak. Analyzed the data: RFC Vieira, TSWJ Vieira, MB Labruna, R Chandrashekar, M Marcondes, AW Biondo, O Vidotto. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: R Chandrashekar, MB Labruna, M Marcondes. Wrote the paper: RFC Vieira, TSWJ Vieira, MB Labruna, O Vidotto.

Received: November 5, 2012; Accepted: January 29, 2013

Correspondence to: Odilon Vidotto, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, PR 445, Km 380. Campus Universitário, 86051-990 Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Phone: +55 43 3371 5958, Fax: +55 43 3371 4485. E-mail:

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.