IDENTIFICATION OF Pseudomonas spp. AS AMOEBA-RESISTANT MICROORGANISMS IN ISOLATES OF Acanthamoeba

Identificação de Pseudomonas spp. como microrganismo resistente a ameba em isolados de Acanthamoeba

Abstracts

Acanthamoeba is a “Trojan horse” of the microbial world. The aim of this study was to identify the presence of Pseudomonas as an amoeba-resistant microorganism in 12 isolates of Acanthamoeba. All isolates showed the genus Pseudomonas spp. as amoeba-resistant microorganisms. Thus, one can see that the Acanthamoeba isolates studied are hosts of Pseudomonas.

Acanthamoeba ; Pseudomonas ; Amoeba-resistant microorganism

Acanthamoeba é um “Cavalo de Tróia” do mundo microbiano. Este estudo teve como objetivo identificar a presença de Pseudomonas como microrganismo resistente a ameba em 12 isolados de Acanthamoeba. Todos os isolados apresentaram o gênero Pseudomonas spp. como um microrganismo resistente a ameba. Assim, podemos ver que os isolados de Acanthamoeba estudados são hospedeiros de Pseudomonas.

Acanthamoeba is an opportunistic human pathogen that is ubiquitously distributed in the environment¹³. It is a causative agent of cutaneous lesions, sinus infections, vision threatening keratitis and rare but fatal encephalitis, known as granulomatous amoebic encephalitis. In addition, it has the ability to act as a host/reservoir for microbial pathogens¹⁰,¹⁶.

Free-living amoebae feed by phagocytosis mainly on bacteria, fungi, and algae, and digestion occurs within phagolysosomes. Some microorganisms have evolved and have become resistant to predation by protists, since they are not internalized or are able to survive, grow, and exit free-living amoebae after internalization. Acanthamoeba is shown to be host/reservoir for numerous bacteria, including the genus Pseudomonas spp., among other bacterial pathogens¹³.

Pseudomonas spp. are highly adaptable bacteria that can colonize various environmental niches, including soil and marine habitats, plants and animals. Pseudomonas spp. are also opportunistic human pathogens, causing infection of the eyes, ears, skin, urethra and respiratory tract in cystic fibrosis (CF) in burned patients, as well as other immunocompromised individuals¹⁵.

In nature, free-living amoebae of the genus Acanthamoeba feed by Pseudomonas spp., which are widely distributed in the environment. Their encounter may be facilitated through better adherence of Pseudomonas spp. (than E. coli) to Acanthamoeba ². However, some Pseudomonas spp. have evolved to become resistant to predation by amoebae, as demonstrated by the isolation of Acanthamoeba naturally infected with P. aeruginosa⁶,¹³. Hence, free-living amoebae might also play a role as a reservoir for some amoeba-resistant strains of Pseudomonas, similar to what was shown for Legionella spp.⁶. This is important, given the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a causative agent of pneumonia⁵. Acanthamoeba has been isolated from contact lens care systems contaminated with Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa⁶.

Many studies have evaluated the interaction between Acanthamoeba spp. and Pseudomonas spp., as well as investigated the presence of these bacterial genera as amoeba-resistant bacteria³,⁸,¹¹.

In this study, the conventional technique of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used, in order to identify the presence of the genus Pseudomonas spp. as amoeba-resistant microorganisms in isolates of Acanthamoeba.

A total of 12 environmental samples existing in the laboratory were used in this study: seven isolates from air-conditioning units identified as Acanthamoeba A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A8 and A10, and five isolates from contact lens cases, Acanthamoeba A1, A6, A9, A11 and A12. The isolates were cultured in PYG media at 30 °C (2% protease peptone, 0.2% yeast extract, and 1.5% glucose) supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin (Life Technologies). The total DNA in the sample was extracted, as described by ALJANABI & MARTINEZ¹. The fresh culture containing 10⁶ trophozoites was homogenized in 400 µL of sterile salt homogenizing buffer (0.4 M NaCl 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0 and 2 mM EDTA pH 8.0), then, 40 µL of 20% SDS (2% final concentration) and 8 µL of 20 mg/mL protenase K (400 µg/mL final concentration) were added and mixed well. The samples were incubated at 65 °C for, at least, one h, after which 300 µL of 6 M NaCl (NaCl saturated H₂O) was added to each sample. Samples were vortexed for 30s at maximum speed, and tubes spun down for 30 min at 10,000 × g. The supernatant was transferred to fresh tubes. An equal volume of isopropanol was added to each sample and samples were incubated at -20 °C for one h. Samples were then centrifuged for 20 min, at 4 °C and at 10,000 × g. The pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, dried and finally resuspended in 100 µL sterile dH₂O.

After extraction, the isolates were screened for the presence of bacterial endosymbiont - Bacteria domain - through the 16S rDNA gene amplified by PCR, using primers fD1 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and rP2 (5′-ACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) that amplify 1500 bp in size, described by WEISBURG et al.¹⁷, under the following conditions: five min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of one min at 94 °C, one min at 55 °C and one min at 72 °C.

The identification of the presence of Pseudomonas genus DNA occurred using the primers described by SPILKER et al.¹⁴ PA-GS-F (5′- GACGGGTGAGTAATGCCTA-3′) and PA-GS-R (5′-CACTGGTGTTCCTTCCTATA-3′) that amplifies 618 pb in size. Amplification was performed in a total volume of 25 µL containing 30 ng DNA, 10 pmol each primer, 5 pmol dNTP, reaction buffer (50 mM KCl₂, 10 mM Tris–HCl), 1.5 mM MgCl₂, and 1 U of Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase (InvitrogenTM). The amplification reaction was carried out in a PTC-150 Minicycler MJ Research thermocycler, under the following conditions: five min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of one min at 94 °C, one min at 58 °C and one min at 72 °C.

The amplification product was separated in 1% agarose gel, stained with 0.5 µM/mL ethidium bromide and observed under a UV-light transilluminator. PCR products were purified using a QIAquick purification kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and resolved with a MegaBace 1000 automated sequencer. Analysis of the DNA sequences was performed with the Chromas Lite program and compared to those present in GenBank (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

In the present study, all isolates of Acanthamoeba showed internalized bacteria when primers are used to amplify the Bacteria domain and all isolates showed the genus Pseudomonas spp. as amoeba-resistant microorganisms (Fig. 1). A total of six PCR products (Ap1 to Ap6) were sent for sequencing (Table 1) and all were confirmed as Pseudomonas spp.

Fig. 1
Samples of Acanthamoeba A1, A6, A9, A11 and A12 isolated from contact lens cases, and A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A8, and A10 isolated from air conditioning units. Positive control (PC) strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 278532.

Table 1
Percentage of similarity and access number compared to GenBank sequences of identified bacteria in this study

Acanthamoeba	Fragment from the gel (GenBank accession)	Similarity BLAST	Access GenBank (number for access)
A1	Ap1 (KF160336)	98%	Pseudomonas sp. c145(2012) 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (JQ781629.1)
A3	Ap2 (KF160337)	96%	Uncultured Pseudomonas sp. clone 3F10 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (HM438578.1)
A4	Ap3 (KF160338)	99%	Pseudomonas sp. CJ-S-R2A3 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (HM584286.1)
A6	Ap4 (KF160339)	99%	Pseudomonas sp. c145(2012) 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (JQ781629.1)
A10	Ap5 (KF160340)	99%	Pseudomonas fluorescens strain C-D-TSA4 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (HM755599.1)
A12	Ap6 (KF160341)	97%	Pseudomonas sp. c145(2012) 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (JQ781629.1)

CALVO et al.³ analyzed Acanthamoeba spp. originated from natural and anthropogenic environments and recorded the presence of Pseudomonas spp. as amoeba-resistant microorganisms in 26.1% of the isolates. GARCIA et al. (4) evaluated isolates from water coming from reservoirs and obtained 32.6% positive for Pseudomonas spp. In a study on clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp., IOVIENO et al.⁸ observed that Pseudomonas spp. were present as amoeba-resistant microorganisms in 59% of the isolates studied.

Pseudomonas spp. have also been reported to be involved in keratitis and fatal pneumonia⁷, among other diseases. Their presence may have a great impact on immune-suppressed individuals, since around 96% of the Pseudomonas spp. isolated from hot tubs and indoor swimming pools in a surveillance study display antimicrobial resistance⁹. Therefore, their prevalence in the environment, not only in recreational water but as part of biofilms in systems of distribution of drinking water, as well as their relevance in human pathogenicity led researchers to seek for its occurrence in amoeba hosts³.

The possible role of Acanthamoeba as an evolutionary precursor of pathogenicity in microbial pathogens has been suggested¹². Bacteria or other microbial endosymbiont may also enhance the pathogenicity of Acanthamoeba¹². However, the results have been inconclusive. There are a few reports suggesting that amoeba-resistant microorganisms enhance the virulence of Acanthamoeba⁶.

In addition to the bacteria identified in this work, the presence of other pathogenic amoeba-resistant microorganisms in the water samples tested cannot be discarded. Acanthamoeba spp. are also potential reservoirs of Mycobacterium spp.³ and Legionella spp., among others microorganisms³.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Aljanabi SM, Martinez I. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res.1997;25:4692-3.
• ²
  Bottone EJ, Perez AA, Gordon RE, Qureshi MN. Differential binding capacity and internalisation of bacterial substrates as factors in growth rate of Acanthamoeba spp. J Med Microbiol. 1994; l40:148-54.
• ³
  Calvo L, Gregorio I, García A, Fernández MT, Goñi P, Clavel A, et al. A new pentaplex-nested PCR to detect five pathogenic bacteria in free living amoebae. Water Res. 2013;47:493-502.
• ⁴
  Garcia A, Goñi P, Cieloszyk J, Fernandez MT, Calvo-Beguería L, Rubio E, et al. Identification of free-living amoebae and amoeba-associated bacteria from reservoirs and water treatment plants by molecular techniques. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:3132-40.
• ⁵
  Garau J, Gomez L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:135-43.
• ⁶
  Greub G, Raoult D. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:413-33.
• ⁷
  Huhulescu S, Simon M, Lubnow M, Kaase M, Wewalka G, Pietzka AT, et al. Fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in a previously healthy woman was most likely associated with a contaminated hot tub. Infection. 2011;39:265-9.
• ⁸
  Iovieno A, Ledee DR, Miller D, Alfonso EC. Detection of bacterial endosymbionts in clinical Acanthamoeba isolates. Ophthalmology. 2010;17:445-52.
• ⁹
  Lutz JK, Lee J. Prevalence and antimicrobial-resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in swimming pools and hot tubs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:554-64.
• ¹⁰
  Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral G. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:273-307.
• ¹¹
  Pagnier I, Raoult D, La Scola B. Isolation and identification of amoeba- resisting bacteria from water in human environment by using an Acanthamoeba polyphaga co-culture procedure. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:1135-44.
• ¹²
  Paterson GN, Rittig M, Siddiqui R, Khan NA. Is Acanthamoeba pathogenicity associated with intracellular bacteria? Exp Parasitol. 2011;129:207-10.
• ¹³
  Siddiqui R, Khan NA. Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:6.
• ¹⁴
  Spilker T, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Li Puma JJ. PCR-based assay for differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from other Pseudomonas species recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2074-9.
• ¹⁵
  Tashiro Y, Uchiyama H, Nomura N. Multifunctional membrane vesicles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol. 2012;4:1349-62.
• ¹⁶
  Visvesvara GS, Moura H, Schuster FL. Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;50:1-26.
• ¹⁷
  Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173 :697-703.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jan-Feb 2015

History

• Received
  20 Sept 2013
• Accepted
  28 Mar 2014