SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue2ScabiesPrevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in different patient groups of a urban university in Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical

Print version ISSN 0037-8682

Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.28 no.2 Uberaba Apr./June 1995

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86821995000200002 

ARTICLES

 

Evaluation of a direct immunofluorescent antibody (difma) test using Leishmania genus - specific monoclonal antibody in the routine diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis

 

 

Martha E. Chico; Ronald H. Guderian; Philip J. Cooper; Rodrigo Armijos; Max Grogl

Adress to correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

A direct immunofluorescent antibody (DIFMA) test using a Leishmania genus- specific monoclonal antibody was evaluated in the routine diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Ecuador. This test was compared with the standard diagnostic techniques of scrapings, culture and histology. Diagnostic samples were taken from a total of 90 active dermal ulcers from patients from areas of Ecuador known to be endemic for cutaneous leishmaniasis. DIFMA was positive in all lesions. It was shown to be significantly superior to standard diagnostic methods either alone or in combination. The sensitivity of DIFMA did not diminish with chronicity of lesions. This test proved to be extremely useful in the routine diagnosis of CL because it is highly sensitive, is easy to use and produces rapid results.

Keywords: Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Diagnosis. Monoclonal antibody.


RESUMO

O método de imunofluorescência direta (DIFMA), com anticorpos monoclonais gênero- específicos para Leishmania, foi avaliado na rotina diagnostica da leishmaniose cutânea no Equador. O método foi comparado com técnicas diagnosticas de rotina: o esfregaço, a cultura e o exame histopatolôgico. As amostras para o diagnóstico foram obtidas de um total de 90 lesões cutâneas ativas, de doentes das ãreas do Equador, endêmicas para leishmaniose cutânea. O DIFMA foi positivo em todas as lesões, com resultados significativamente superior aos métodos diagnósticos de rotina, isolado ou em combinação. A sensibilidade do DFIMA não diminui em lesões crônicas. O método mostra-se muito útil no diagnóstico de leishmaniose cutânea, pela sua sensibilidade, rapidez e facilidade de execução.

Palavras-chave: Leishmaniose cutânea. Diagnóstico. Anticorpos monoclonais.


 

 

Full text available only in PDF format.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

 

 

REFERENCES

1. Anthony RL, Grogl M, Sacci B, Bailou KW! Rapid detection of Leishmania amastigotes in fluid aspirates and biopsies of human tissues. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 37:271-276,1987.         [ Links ]

2. Anthony RL, Williams KM, Sacci JB, Rubin DC. Subcellular and taxonomic specificity of monoclonal antibodies lo New World Leishmania. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 34:1085-1094,1985.         [ Links ]

3. Armitage P. Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1974.         [ Links ]

4. Armijos RX, Chico ME, Cruz ME, Guderian, RH, Kreutzer RD, Berman JD, Rogers MD, Grogl M. Human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ecuador; identification of parasites by enzyme electrophoresis .The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 42:424-428,1990.         [ Links ]

5. Furuya M, Mimori T, Gomez EA, De Coronel Y Kawabata M, Hashiguchi Y. Epidemiological survey of leishmaniasis using skin test and ELISA in Ecuador. Japanese Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 17:331-338,1989.         [ Links ]

6. Grimaldi G,Tesh RB, McMahon-Pratt D. A review of the geographical distribution and epidemiology of leishmaniasis in the New World. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 41:687-725,1989.         [ Links ]

7. Grogl M, Milhous WK, Martin RK, Kyle DE. Kits for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in field laboratories. Proceedings of the Society of Armed Forces Laboratory Science 18:22,1989.         [ Links ]

8. Hendricks L, Wright N. Diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by in vitro cultivation of saline aspirates in Schneiders Drosophila medium. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 28:962-964,1979.         [ Links ]

9. Kerdell-Vegas F. American leishmaniasis. International Journal of Dermatology 21:291-303, 1982.         [ Links ]

10. Lainson R, Shaw JJ. Evolution, classification and geographical distribution. In: Peters W, Killick-Kendrick R (eds) The leishmaniasis in biology and medicine, 1st edition, Academic Press, London p.1-120,1987.         [ Links ]

11. Lynch NR, Malave C, Ifante RB, Modlin R, Convit J. In situ detection of amastigotes in american cutaneous leishmaniasis using monoclonal antibodies. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 80:6-9, 1986.         [ Links ]

12. Manson-Bahr PC, Diagnosis. In: Peters W, Killick-Kendrick R (ed) The leishmaniasis in biology and medicine. Academic Press, London p.703-729, 1987.         [ Links ]

13. McMahon-Pratt D, David JR. Application of monoclonal antibodies specific for Leishmania species, In: Proceedings of a workshop held at the Pan American Health Organization, 9-11 December, 1980. UNDP World Bank. WHO Special Programme for Research and Trapical Diseases, Geneva, Switzerland p.247-257,1982.         [ Links ]

14. Mimori T, Grimaldi G, Kreutzer RD, Gomez EA, McMahon-Pratt D, Tesh RB, Hashigushi Y. Identification, using enzyme electrophoresis and monoclonal antibodies, of leishmania isolated from human and wild animals in Ecuador. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 40:154-158,1989.         [ Links ]

15. Pappas MG, McGreevy PB, Hajkowski R, Hendricks LD, Oster CN, Hockmeyer WT. Evaluation of promastigote and amastigote antigens in the indirect fluorescent antibody test for american cutaneous leishmaniasis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 32:1260-1267,1983.         [ Links ]

16. Restrepo M. La reaccion de Montenegro en al epidemiologia de la leishmaniasis sudamericana. Boletin de Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana 89:130-136,1980.         [ Links ]

17. Scott JE, ShrefflerWG, Ghalib HW, El Asad A, Siddig M, Badro R, Reed SG. A rapid and simple diagnostic test for active visceral leishmaniasis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 44:272-277,1991.         [ Links ]

18. Weigle KA, De Davalos M, Heredia P, Molineros R, Saravia NG, Alessandro A. Diagnosis of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia: A comparison of seven methods. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 36.489- 496,1987.         [ Links ]

19. World Health Organization. Report of a training seminar on epidemiological methods for the leishmaniasis, UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases,TDR/ LEISH-SEM/ 80.3 p 23-24,1980.         [ Links ]

20. World Health Organization. Report of the fourth meeting of the scientific working group on immunology of leishmaniasis. UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, TDR/ LEISH-SWG (4)/ 82.3 p 7-13,1982.         [ Links ]

 

 

Adress to correspondence:
Dra. Martha Chico,
Department of Clinical Investigation,
National Center for Tropical Diseases.
Hospital Vozandes, Casilla 17-17-691,
Quito, Ecuador, South America.
Fax: 593-2-447-263.

Recebido para publicação em 10/06/94.

 

 

National Center for Tropical Diseases- Quito branch, Hospital Vozandes, Institute of Investigation, School of Medicine, Central University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador and Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Washington, DC. USA.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License