SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 número4Eficácia do adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir e telbivudina para o tratamento da hepatite crônica B: revisão sistemáticaPerfil epidemiológico da meningite bacteriana aguda no estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical

versão impressa ISSN 0037-8682

Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.43 no.4 Uberaba jul./ago. 2010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822010000400022 

COMMUNICATION COMUNICAÇÃO

 

Epidemiology of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacter bacteremia in a brazilian hospital

 

Epidemiologia de bacteremia causadas por Enterobacter produtores de β-lactamases de espectro estendido em um hospital brasileiro

 

 

Felipe Francisco Tuon; Leila Carolina Bianchet; Sergio Ricardo Penteado-Filho

Division of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Hospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

Address to

 

 


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Enterobacter can be included in the group of extended spectrum β-lactamases (EBSL)-producing bacteria, though few studies exist evaluating risk factors associated with this microorganism. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine risk factors associated with ESBL-producing-Enterobacter and mortality
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with 58 bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing-Enterobacter (28 cases) and non-ESBL (30 cases)
RESULTS: Risk factors associated with ESBL-Enterobacter were trauma, length of hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit, urinary catheter and elective surgery (p< 0.05). The survival curves were similar for ESBL and non-ESBL
CONCLUSIONS: ESBL-producing-Enterobacter bacteremia is prevalent and the survival curve was similar to non-ESBL-producing strains.

Key-words: Extended spectrum β-lactamases. Enterobacter. Bacteremia.


RESUMO

INTRODUÇÃO: Enterobacter pode ser incluído no grupo de bactérias produtoras de β-lactamases de espectro estendido (ESBL), mas existem poucos estudos avaliando fatores de risco para ESBL. Nós realizamos uma coorte retrospective para determiner fatores de risco associados com Enterobacter produtores de ESBL
MÉTODOS:
Uma coorte retrospectiva com 58 bacteremias por Enterobacter ESBL (28 casos) e não-ESBL (30 casos)
RESULTADOS: Fatores de risco para ESBL-Enterobacter foram trauma, tempo de internação, admissão em UTI, sonda vesical e cirurgia eletiva (p<0.05). A mortalidade foi similar entre ESBL e não-ESBL
CONCLUSÕES: Enterobacter produtor de ESBL é prevalente e a curva de mortalidade foi semelhante com o grupo não-ESBL.

Palavras-chaves: β-lactamases de espectro estendido. Enterobacter. Bacteremia.


 

 

Infections caused by extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) producing bacteria has increased mortality in hospitalized patients1. Invasive procedures, admission to intensive care units and previous use of antibiotics are the most common risk factors for ESBL-producing bacteria2. Enterobacter is a microorganism associated with Amp-C gene resistance that confers resistance to third generation cephalosporins. However, our group has observed a progressive decrease in susceptibility to fourth generation cephalosporin in our institution, suggesting the increase of ESBL-producing strains. Enterobacter can be included in the group of EBSL-producing bacteria, though few studies exist evaluating risk factors associated with this microorganism.

Even though the treatment of infections caused by ESBL strains is the same for non-ESBL Enterobacter, we believe that certain clinical and/or laboratorial findings or previous antibiotic use could be risk factors for ESBL-producing Enterobacter. Thus, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine risk factors associated with ESBL strains of Enterobacter sp.

The retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Hospital Universitario Evangelico de Curitiba. This center is a 660-bed tertiary hospital in Curitiba, a city located in southern Brazil. From January 2006 to January 2009, 884 bacteremia were identified (excluding coagulase negative Staphylococcus) and 58 (6.5%) were caused by Enterobacter sp. All the patients with bacteremia caused by Enterobacter were included only once using data from the first bacteremia. Only patients older than 12 years of age were evaluated.

Cultures were collected according to the standard protocol used in the hospital and were processed using the BACT/Alert® (bioMerieux, Durham, USA). Enterobacter was identified using biochemical analysis3. Susceptibility testing was performed by the disk diffusion method, in accordance with CLSI guidelines, and ESBL was defined using cefepime with amoxicillin/clavulanate disk approximation method4.

The following variables were evaluated for each patient: sex; age; previous hospital admission within the preceding 90 days; admission to the intensive care unit; length of hospitalization before bacteremia; use of mechanical ventilation, central venous line, urinary catheter and surgery during the current hospitalization; underlying conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, heart failure, cancer; acute renal failure trauma and previous antibiotic use during current hospitalization; previous colonization by Enterobacter. The following laboratorial results were evaluated on the day of diagnosis: hemoglobin, leukocyte, platelet counts, sodium, potassium, creatinine, urea, total billirubin and partial pressure of oxygen from arterial blood.

Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality were registered. Antibiotic treatment was classified as adequate or inadequate. Treatment of each patient was considered adequate if Enterobacter was susceptible to the antibiotic used during bacteremia and treatment was initiated within the first 48 hours of bacteremia diagnosis. For ESBL strains, the only antibiotic considered adequate was carbapenem.

Patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacter bacteremia were compared with patients with non-ESBL bacteremia to determine factors associated with resistance. A second analysis was performed comparing patients who died during hospitalization with those who survived. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median with ranges. Frequencies were expressed as percentages. Dichotomous variables were compared using the χ2 test and the Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables. Significance level was set at 0.05. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for each variable. Variables in which 95% CI did not include 1.0 were maintained in the final model.

Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated to evaluate the role of adequate treatment in the outcome of bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacter and the difference was assessed using the log-rank test. Significance was determined when P value was lower than 0.05.

All data were recorded using the software Excel (Microsoft, New York, USA) and the statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, USA). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were determined with GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad, La Jolla, USA).

A total of 58 patients were included in this study. Twenty-eight (48.2%) patients were enrolled as ESBL-producing Enterobacter strains and 30 (51.8%) patients were included as non-ESBL. The median age was 52.1 years-old (19 to 93) and 72.4% were male. The mean length of hospitalization was 43.9 days (±71.7). The mean duration of hospitalization until first Enterobacter was 20.7 days (±24.3). Patient characteristics and laboratorial data are described in Table 1. The most common species of Enterobacter was E. aerogenes (71%), followed by E. gergoviae (17%) and E. cloacae (12%).

 

 

Risk factors associated with ESBL-Enterobacter were trauma, length of hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit, urinary catheter and elective surgery (p< 0.05).

The 30-day mortality of patients with Enterobacter bloodstream infection was 48.3%. The 30-day mortality was similar between ESBL and non-ESBL (51.7% vs 46.7%; p= 0.29). The global mortality showed the same tendency (53.4% vs 46.3, p= 0.21). In the univariated analysis, urinary catheter, previous use of cefepime, length of hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit and mechanical ventilation were factors associated with high mortality (p< 0.05).

The antibiotic therapy was incorrect in 93.3% in the non-survival group and 82% in the survival group. The inadequate therapy was corrected in 70.7% of these patients. Kaplan-Meier survival showed a similar curve of mortality in ESBL and non-ESBL (Figure 1).

 

 

Enterobacter is a less important microorganism than other ESBL-producing bacteria (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) in the medical literature. The origin of Enterobacter infection is related with bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract, the habitat of this pathogen. The incidence of ESBL-strains in our institute is high, achieving 60% in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia.

Hospitalization time before Enterobacter bacteremia was similar between ESBL and non-ESBL (more than 15 days), suggesting that a prolonged stay in the hospital was not a condition for ESBL Enterobacter. In the univariated analysis, intensive care unit admission, urinary catheter, elective surgery and trauma were risk factors associated with ESBL-strains. All these conditions are related to the severe conditions of the patients, as well as use of large spectrum antibiotics. A published previously study verified irrelevant risk factors for Enterobacter bacteremia among other bacteria, but no comparison was performed regarding different resistance profile5. Chang et al6 showed that fourth generation cephalosporin resistance was an independent risk factor of mortality in Enterobacter bacteremia6. The mortality curve showed a tendency of higher mortality in the first 15 days after bacteremia caused by ESBL strains, with no statistical significance.

Risk factors for death were similar to those determined for the ESBL-strain, mainly associated with invasive procedures, previous use of cefepime and admission to the intensive care unit.

The mortality of Enterobacter bacteremia is high and most patients in the death group were being administered inadequate therapy. The number of cases in this study does not permit a significant result to confirm this logical tendency. However, this demonstrated that the service needs to change its empirical therapy for patients with bacteremia, especially after 15 days of admission. In another study, 66% of inadequate empirical therapy had been used until final culture with further adequacy6. Most patients were using piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime during bacteremia (data not shown) and carbapenem should be used empirically until final cultures, avoiding the up-escalation therapy shown in the present study, where most physicians corrected the therapy following final culture, increasing the spectrum of the antibiotic.

Enterobacter is a frequent pathogen in bacteremia, the mortality is high and ESBL-producing strains are prevalent in our hospital, following the tendency of other Enterobacteriaceae related with this mechanism of resistance, empirical use of carbapenem should be considered in this pattern of hospital, since this study demonstrated that ESBL strains can occur early.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES

1 Marra AR, Pereira CA, Castelo A, do CF, Jr., Cal RG, Sader HS, et al. Health and economic outcomes of the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae-produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in a hospital with high prevalence of this infection. Int J Infect Dis 2006;10: 56-60.         [ Links ]

2 Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005;18: 657-686.         [ Links ]

3 York M. Aerobic Bacteriology. In: Isenberg HI, editor. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. 2 ed. New York: ASM Press, 2004. p. 3.17.1-3.17.48.         [ Links ]

4 Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing; Fifteenth Informational Supplement. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute; 2005.         [ Links ]

5 Blot SI, Vandewoude KH, Colardyn FA. Evaluation of outcome in critically ill patients with nosocomial enterobacter bacteremia: results of a matched cohort study. Chest 2003; 123: 1208-1213.         [ Links ]

6 Chang EP, Chiang DH, Lin ML, Chen TL, Wang FD, Liu CY. Clinical characteristics and predictors of mortality in patients with Enterobacter aerogenes bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2009; 42: 329-335.         [ Links ]

 

 

Address to:
Dr. Felipe Francisco Tuon
Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Clinic/Hospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba
Al. Augusto Stellfeld 1908/3º andar, SCIH - Bigorrilho
80730-150 Curitiba, PR, Brasil
Phone: 55 41 3240-5055; Fax: 55 41 3240-5274
e-mail: flptuon@gmail.com

Received in 08/12/2009
Accepted in 23/03/2010