Print version ISSN 0037-8682
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.44 no.5 Uberaba Sept./Oct. 2011 Epub Aug 19, 2011
Avaliação de amostras de Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi isoladas de cães oriundos de duas áreas endêmicas de leishmaniose visceral no Brasil através da eletroforese de isoenzimas
Carlos Eduardo Ribeiro CoutinhoI; Dilvani Oliveira SantosII; Cibele BaptistaI; Fabiano Borges FigueiredoIII; Maria de Fatima MadeiraI
ILaboratório de Vigilância em Leishmaniose, Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ
IILaboratório de Biopatogêneses e Ativação Celular, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ
IIILaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatozoonoses em Animais Domésticos, Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ
INTRODUCTION: Domestic dogs are the most important reservoir in the peridomestic transmission cycle of Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi. The genetic variability of subpopulations of this parasite circulating in dogs has not been thoroughly analyzed in Brazil, even though this knowledge has important implications in the clinical-epidemiological context.
METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the phenotypic variability of 153 L. chagasi strains isolated from dogs originating from the municipalities of Rio de Janeiro (n = 57) and Belo Horizonte (n = 96), where the disease is endemic. Strains isolated only from intact skin were selected and analyzed by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis using nine enzyme systems (6PG, GPI, NH1 and NH2, G6P, PGM, MDH, ME, and IDHNADP).
RESULTS: The electrophoretic profile was identical for all isolates analyzed and was the same as that of the L. chagasi reference strain (MHOM/BR/74/PP75). Phenetic analysis showed a similarity index of one for all strains, with the isolates sharing 100% of the characteristics analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that the L. chagasi populations circulating in dogs from Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte belong to a single zymodeme.
Keywords: Dog. Leishmania chagasi. Genetic variability. MLEE.
INTRODUÇÃO: Cães domésticos são considerados os reservatórios mais importantes no ciclo peridoméstico de transmissão de Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi. No entanto, a variabilidade genética de sub-populações que circulam neste hospedeiro é ainda pouco explorada no Brasil, sendo tal conhecimento de grande importância no contexto clínico-epidemiológico.
MÉTODOS: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar e comparar a variabilidade fenotípica de 153 amostras de L. chagasi isoladas de cães oriundos dos municípios do Rio de Janeiro (n = 57) e Belo Horizonte (n = 96), onde a doença é endêmica. Foram selecionadas somente amostras isoladas de pele íntegra e analisadas por eletroforese de isoenzimas (MLEE) empregando nove sistemas enzimáticos (6PG, GPI, NH1 e NH2, G6P, PGM, MDH, ME, IDHNADP).
RESULTADOS: Todas as amostras analisadas apresentaram perfil eletroforético idêntico entre si e com a amostra de L. chagasi utilizada como referência neste estudo (MHOM/BR/74/PP75). A análise fenética demonstrou índice de similaridade igual a um para todas as amostras, revelando um compartilhamento de 100% dos caracteres avaliados.
CONCLUSÕES: A partir desses resultados, podemos inferir que as populações de L. chagasi que estão circulando nos cães do Rio de Janeiro e Belo Horizonte podem ser agrupadas em um único zimodema.
Palavras-chaves: Cão. Leishmania chagasi. Variabilidade genética. MLEE.
Leishmaniases are diseases caused by different species of the genus Leishmania, including the subgenera Viannia and Leishmania1. Clinically, leishmaniasis can be divided into visceral leishmaniasis and tegumentary leishmaniasis, with both diseases presenting a broad spectrum of manifestations2,3.
In Brazil, Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi [syn. Leishmania infantum] is the only agent that causes visceral leishmaniasis and is associated with the vector Lutzomyia longipalpis in most regions. Recently, Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi has been detected in natural canine infections in areas unaffected by visceral leishmaniasis4.The role of the dog as a domestic reservoir in the transmission cycle of visceral leishmaniasis has been well established. The disease progresses slowly in this animal but shows an insidious onset and a variable spectrum of clinical manifestations. During more advanced stages of the disease, onychogryphosis, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, alopecia, dermatitis, skin ulcers, keratoconjunctivitis, a runny nose, anemia, apathy, diarrhea, intestinal hemorrhage, paw edema, vomiting, and hyperkeratosis are frequent findings5. However, the disease may remain latent in some cases and may even resolve spontaneously6.
The identity of the etiological agent of visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas has been the matter of numerous discussions7-9. For a long time, L. chagasi has been considered to be an autochthonous agent in the New World, and this hypothesis directed studies that genetically compared L. chagasi and L. infantum using isolates obtained from different hosts and by different methods10-13. In all studies cited, L. chagasi and L. infantum presented similar genetic profiles and were considered to be the same species. It is currently assumed that this parasite was introduced to South America during European colonization through dogs infected with L. infantum, the predominant species in Mediterranean countries, and that L. infantum adapted to new vectors and hosts14,15.
The correct classification of Leishmania parasites is fundamental for the establishment of control measures for the diseases caused by these organisms, and numerous tools are currently applied for this purpose. In this respect, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) is the reference standard for the identification of species of the genus Leishmania and is one of the methods most used for the characterization of species of this genus16-21. The characterization of isolates is important, especially in epidemiological surveillance studies, permitting the mapping of Leishmania species and variants that circulate in humans and animals in a given region. In addition, this characterization contributes to a better understanding of the factors related to these phenotypic variations, such as clinical characteristics, drug resistance, parasite virulence, preference for certain hosts, and association with certain immunosuppressive diseases.
In view of the importance of the domestic dog in the transmission cycle of L. chagasi and the importance of studies investigating the genetic variability of isolates circulating in this host, the objective of the present investigation was to evaluate and compare the phenotypic characteristics of 153 Leishmania strains isolated from dogs originating from two endemic areas in Brazil.
The 153 isolates studied were obtained from the strain collection of the Laboratory of Leishmaniasis Surveillance (VigiLeish, IPEC/ FIOCRUZ). The strains isolated from dogs were obtained during epidemiological surveys carried out in the municipalities of Rio de Janeiro (Campo Grande, Guaratiba, Barra de Guaratiba, Barra da Tijuca, Jacarepaguá, Realengo and Bangu) during the period from 2000 to 2008 (RJ; n= 57) and Belo Horizonte (Barreiro, Centro Sul, Leste, Nordeste, Noroeste, Norte, Oeste, Pampulha and Lagoa de Pampulha) in 2004 (BH; n = 96). Both regions are located in southeastern Brazil. Only strains isolated from the intact skin of dogs presenting different clinical conditions were selected. First, the isolates were recovered from liquid nitrogen storage and expanded in Schneider's medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Cultilab) and antibiotics (200 units/mL penicillin G potassium and 100 units/mL streptomycin) to obtain approximately 109 parasites. When in the exponential phase, the culture was pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in appropriate buffer, and stored at -196ºC until isoenzyme electrophoresis.
Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis was performed on 1% gels according to previously described procedures17,22. Nine enzyme systems were used: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGDH), glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI), nucleoside hydrolase (NH1 and NH2), phosphoglucomutase (PGM), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), malic enzyme (ME), and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH). The gels were analyzed by determining the electrophoretic mobility of the bands based on the standard positions of the following reference strains: Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi (MHOM/BR/74/PP75), Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis (MHOM/BR/75/M2903), and Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis (IFLA/BR/67/PH8).
The MLEE bands were compared using the simple matching coefficient of similarity, and the matrix was transformed into a dendrogram using the UPGMA algorithm23. Phenetic analysis was performed with the NTSYS-pc program, version 2.02 (Exeter Software, Setauket, NY, USA).
The collection of biological samples from the dogs was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals of FIOCRUZ (CEUA/FIOCRUZ), license numbers P-286/06 and L-023/06.
All 153 canine isolates analyzed by MLEE demonstrated similar electrophoretic profiles, which were similar to that of the L. chagasi reference strain (MHOM/BR/74/PP75). No isoenzyme variants were observed among parasites isolated from Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte. All isolates were classified into the same zymodeme, with a similarity index of one, demonstrating that all isolates studied shared 100% of the characteristics analyzed (Figure 1).
Visceral leishmaniasis is widely distributed in Brazil, with outbreaks occurring in urban areas, a fact highlighting the importance of the domestic dog in this context2,24,25. Clinically, dogs infected with L. chagasi can show a broad spectrum of manifestations or can remain asymptomatic, suggesting the circulation of distinct subpopulations of the parasite in these hosts. Because of this variation, studies investigating the genetic variability of strains isolated from dogs are extremely important but are scarce in the literature. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the phenotypic characteristics of L. chagasi strains isolated from dogs originating from two endemic areas in Brazil.
In addition to being an effective method for the identification of Leishmania isolates, isoenzyme electrophoresis has various applications. One of the disadvantages of this technique is the need for previous isolation of the parasite to subsequently obtain a large culture volume, a fact that has contributed to the use of PCR-based methods in many studies26,27. However, the variability of parasites of the genus Leishmania has been widely studied by MLEE11,19,28.
In the present study, nine enzyme systems were used for the analysis of 153 L. chagasi strains isolated from animals originating from two endemic regions. These isolates presented identical electrophoretic profiles. This result demonstrates that the isolates originating from the two endemic regions showed no difference that could be associated with geographic area or host status, indicating complete homogeneity of this species. This fact has also been reported by other investigators who demonstrated the absence of enzyme polymorphisms in L. chagasi isolates11,29,30. In this respect, one interesting fact is the large heterogeneity observed among L. infantum strains, with the numerous zymodemes circulating naturally in different regions of the Old World31. MON-1 is the only zymodeme described for L. infantum that shows identity with L. chagasi in the Americas. This fact suggests that the introduction of L. chagasi to the American continent occurred at a single time point and that all strains in the Americas are derived from this zymodeme or that only this zymodeme found conditions that permitted the adaptation and propagation of the parasite. This fact may also explain the homogeneity of L. chagasi observed in this study and reported by other investigators12. The homogeneity of this species may also be related to the poor diversity of vertebrate and invertebrate hosts in the transmission cycle or to the fact that all isolates analyzed were obtained from a single anatomical site on the animals (intact skin), somehow standardizing subpopulations that show tropism for this site. Parasitism of intact skin of dogs infected with L. chagasi, which was described for the first time in the 1950s32, is one of the characteristics that renders the dog an important reservoir in the transmission cycle. This site has been used for the parasitological confirmation of seroreactive dogs, and the isolates for the present study were obtained from this site, demonstrating that the skin is an excellent target for the parasitological confirmation of canine visceral leishmaniasis33,34.
The present results demonstrate the low variability of L. chagasi. In addition, the findings demonstrate that the population of Leishmania parasites circulating in dogs from Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte is extremely homogeneous and shares 100% of characteristics, revealing that the isolates analyzed in this study all belong to a single zymodeme.
We thank Célia de Fatima Moreira Venâncio for technical assistance. This research is part of the Master Degree Dissertation in Clinical Research in Infectious Disease of Carlos Eduardo Ribeiro Coutinho in the Program of the Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
1. Lainson R, Shaw JJ. Evolution, classification and geographical distribution. In: Peters W, Killick-Kendick R, editors. The Leishmaniases in Biology and Medicine. London: Academic Press; 1987. p. 43-45. [ Links ]
2. Ministério da Saúde. Manual de Vigilância e Controle da Leishmaniose Visceral. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2006. [ Links ]
3. Ministério da Saúde. Manual de Vigilância da Leishmaniose Tegumentar Americana. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2010. [ Links ]
4. Souza GD, Santos E, Andrade Filho JD. The first report of the main vector of visceral leishmaniasis in America, Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae), in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2009; 104:1181-1182. [ Links ]
5. Alvar J, Cañavate C, Molina R, Moreno J, Nieto J. Canine Leishmaniasis. Adv Parasitol 2004; 57:1-88. [ Links ]
6. Marzochi MC, Coutinho SG, Souza WJ, Toledo LM, Grimaldi Junior G, Momen H, et al. Canine visceral leishmaniasis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Clinical, parasitological, therapeutical and epidemiological findings (1977-1983). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1985; 80:349-357. [ Links ]
7. Lainson R. The American Leishmaniases: some observations on their ecology and epidemioly. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1983; 77:569-596. [ Links ]
8. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Silveira FT, Braga RR. American visceral leishmaniasis: on the origin of Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1987; 81:517. [ Links ]
9. Mauricio IL, Stothard JR, Miles MA. The strange case of Leishmania chagasi. Parasitol Today 2000; 16:188-189. [ Links ]
10. Grimaldi Junior G, McMahon-Pratt D. Leishmaniasis and its etiological agents in the New Word: an overview. Prog Clin Parasitol 1991; 2:73-118. [ Links ]
11. Momen H, Pacheco RS, Cupolillo E, Grimaldi Junior G. Molecular evidence for the importation of old world Leishmania into the Americas. Biol Research 1993; 26:249-255. [ Links ]
12. Momen H, Grimaldi Junior G, Deane LM. Leishmania infantum, the aetiological agent of American visceral leishmaniasis (AVL)? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1987; 82:447-448. [ Links ]
13. Maurício IL, Howard MK, Stothard JR, Miles MA. Genomic diversity in the Leishmania donovani complex. Parasitol 1999; 119:237-246. [ Links ]
14. Shaw J. The leishmaniases - survival and expansion in a changing world. A minireview. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007; 102:541-547. [ Links ]
15. Lukes J, Mauricio IL, Schonian G, Dujardin JC, Soteriadou K, Dedet JP, et al. Evolutionary and geographical history of the Leishmania donovani complex with a revision of current taxonomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007; 104:9375-9380. [ Links ]
16. Momen H. Parasite characterization by zimodeme analysis. In: Morel CM, editor. Genes and Antigens of Parasites. A laboratory manual. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 1984. p. 111. [ Links ]
17. Cupolillo E, Grimaldi Junior G, Momen H. A general classification of New World Leishmania using numerical zymotaxonomy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1994; 50:296-311. [ Links ]
18. Cupolillo E, Grimaldi Junior G, Momen H. Discrimination of Leishmania isolates using a limited set of enzymatic loci. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1995; 89:17-23. [ Links ]
19. Cupolillo E, Brahim LR, Toaldo CB, Oliveira-Neto MP, Brito ME, Falqueto A, et al. Genetic polymorphism and molecular epidemiology of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis from different hosts and geographic areas in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:3126-3132. [ Links ]
20. Pratlong F, Rioux JA, Marty P, Faraut-Gambarelli F, Dereure J, Lanotte G, et al. Isoenzymatic analysis of 712 strains of Leishmania infantum in the south of France and relationship of enzymatic polymorphism to clinical and epidemiological features. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:4077-4082. [ Links ]
21. Maurício IL, Yeo M, Baghaei M, Doto D, Pratlong F, Zemanova E, et al. Towards multilocus sequence typing of the Leishmania donovani complex: resolving genotypes and haplotypes for five polymorphic metabolic enzymes (ASAT, GPI, NH1, NH2, PGD). Int J Parasitol 2006; 36:757-769. [ Links ]
22. Pacheco RS, Martinez JE, Valderrama L, Momen H, Saravia MG. Genotypic polymorphisms in experimental metastatic dermal leishmaniasis. Mol Bioch Parasitol 1995; 69:197-209. [ Links ]
23. Sneath PH, Sokal RR. Numerical taxonomy. Nature 1962; 193:855-860. [ Links ]
24. Dantas-Torres F. Canine leishmaniosis in South America. Parasit Vectors 2009; 2(suppl 1):1. [ Links ]
25. Marzochi MC, Fagundes A, Andrade MV, Souza MB, Madeira MF, Mouta-Confort E, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ecoepidemiological aspects and control. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2009; 42:570-580. [ Links ]
26. Baptista C, Schubach AO, Madeira MF, Leal CA, Pires MQ, Oliveira FS, et al. Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis genotypes identified in lesions of patients with atypical or typical manifestations of tegumentary leishmaniasis: evaluation by two molecular markers. Exp Parasitol 2009; 121:317-322. [ Links ]
27. Oliveira FS, Valete-Rosalino CM, Schubach AO, Pacheco RS. kDNA minicircle signatures of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in oral and nasal mucosa from mucosal leishmaniasis patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 66:361-365. [ Links ]
28. Pacheco RS, Barbosa-Santos EGO, Brito CMM, Pires MQ, Marzochi MCA. Epidemiological and genotypical mapping of human Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in Paraguay. J Protozool Res 1999; 9:76-87. [ Links ]
29. Lopes UG, Momen H, Grimaldi Junior G, Marzochi MC, Pacheco RS, Morel CM. Schizodeme and zymodeme characterization of Leishmania in the investigation of foci of visceral and cutaneous Leishmaniasis. J Parasitol 1984; 70:89-98. [ Links ]
30. Madeira MF, Schubach AO, Schubach TM, Leal CA, Marzochi MC. Identification of Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi isolated from healthy skin of symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs seropositive for Leishmaniasis in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis 2004; 8:440-444. [ Links ]
31. Kuhls K, Chicharro C, Cañavate C, Cortes S, Campino L, Haralambous C, et al. Differentiation and gene flow among European populations of Leishmania infantum MON-1. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008; 2:e261. [ Links ]
32. Deane LM, Deane MP. Leishmaniose visceral urbana (no cão e no homem) em Sobral, Ceará. O Hosp 1955; 47:75-87. [ Links ]
33. Madeira MF, Schubach AO, Schubach TM, Pereira SA, Figueiredo FB, Baptista C, et al. Post mortem parasitological evaluation of dogs seroreactive for Leishmania from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2006; 138:366-370. [ Links ]
34. Madeira MF, Figueiredo FB, Pinto AG, Nascimento LD, Furtado M, Mouta-Confort E, et al. Parasitological diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis: is intact skin a good target? Res Vet Sci 2009; 87:260-262. [ Links ]
Dra. Maria de Fatima Madeira
Lab. Vigilância em Leishmanioses/IPEC/FIOCRUZ
Av. Brasil 4.365
21040-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Phone/fax: 55 21 3865-9541
Received in 06/11/2010
Accepted in 19/04/2011