Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight: a promising alternative method of identifying the major coagulase-negative Staphylococci species

Abstract

INTRODUCTION.

This study aimed to evaluate different methods for differentiation of species of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) that caused infections in hospitalized immunocompromised patients.

METHODS.

A total of 134 CoNS strains were characterized using four different methods.

RESULTS.

The results of matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis were in complete agreement with those of tuf gene sequencing (kappa index = 1.00). The kappa index of Vitek 2^® Compact analysis was 0.85 (very good) and that of the conventional method was 0.63 (moderate).

CONCLUSIONS

. MALDI-TOF MS provided rapid and accurate results for the identification of CoNS (134; 100%).

Keywords:
Coagulase-negative staphylococci; MALDI-TOF; tuf gene

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) constitute an important group of opportunistic pathogens that cause infections predominantly in hospitalized immunocompromised patients, which are associated with indwelling or implanted medical devices. The species most frequently associated with human infections are Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, followed by Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus simulans, and Staphylococcus lugdunensis; most isolates are resistant to multiple drugs^1,2. The increasing incidence of CoNS hospital-acquired infections emphasizes the need for accurate and rapid identification of Staphylococcus at the species level. Although the ability to distinguish between these pathogens is clinically relevant, a number of laboratory limitations still exist^1,3. Molecular methods are currently favored for accurate identification and several target genes, such as tuf gene, exhibit high discriminatory power⁴. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Microflex LT instrument, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and three other identification methods to differentiate between CoNS samples.

A total of 134 CoNS clinical isolates from the blood cultures (112) and catheter tips (22) of patients hospitalized in a tertiary care teaching Hospital in Curitiba, Brazil were studied. The discriminatory power of MALDI-TOF MS was compared to that of the gold standard tuf gene sequencing method, an automated method (Vitek^® 2 Compact, bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and a conventional method for all CoNS included in the study. In addition, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antimicrobials oxacillin, daptomycin, linezolid, and vancomycin were evaluated and the presence of the mecA gene was determined by PCR for all strains.

All bacterial isolates were preliminarily identified by catalase, coagulase, and deoxyribonuclease tests. In addition, the disk diffusion assay was used to determine susceptibility to fosfomycin (200µg) and desferrioxamine (300µg)⁵. Subsequently, the strains were evaluated using the conventional method proposed by Cunha et al., for distinguishing between species not identified by the previous tests³. S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 was used as the control strain. Finally, the Vitek^® 2 Compact automated system was used as per the manufacturer’s instructions; the acceptable criterion for identification was set at 93-99% probability.

For MALDI-TOF MS analysis, a loopful of cells from a fresh overnight pure culture was processed as previously described⁶. The obtained mass spectra were analyzed using the Microflex LT instrument with MALDI Biotyper 3.0 software. The identification score cutoff value was set at ≥1.8⁷.

For sequencing of the tuf gene, template DNA was extracted from all 134 CoNS and a reference strain (S. epidermidis ATCC 35984) using the post-boiling (15 min at 95°C) technique. The reaction mixture, cycling conditions, and primer sets used for PCR were those previously described by Hwang et al⁸. All products (412bp) were purified using the EXO SAP kit (Amershan Science, USB, Cleveland, OH, USA) and sequenced with the ABI Prism^TM BigDye Terminator kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Forward sequences were analyzed using the BLASTn alignment program and the NCBI nucleotide database. An alignment score of ≥95% was considered sufficient for species identification.

All 134 bacterial isolates were evaluated by disk-diffusion test with cefoxitin (30µg). MICs were determined by agar dilution test for linezolid and by broth microdilution test for vancomycin and daptomycin according to CLSI M07-A09 and the interpretive criteria described in CLSI M100-S24^9,10. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis were used as control strains. The presence of mecA gene was evaluated for PCR, where a genomic DNA from each of the isolates was amplified with the primers mecA-1 (5′→3′ CTCAGGTACTGCTATCCACC) and mecA-2 (5′→3′ CACTTGGTATATCTTCACC) and the product was detected as a 310-bp fragment as previously described^11,12.

The agreement between the results of the different techniques used in this study was determined by statistical analyses, using the Kappa Cohen (κ) statistical method with the criteria outlined by Landis & Koch (1977): poor agreement (kappa index < 0), slight agreement (0.01-0.2), reasonable agreement (0.21-0.40),moderate agreement (0.41-0.60), substantial agreement (0.61-0.80), and almost perfect agreement (0.81-1.00)¹³.

The species most frequently identified by tuf gene sequencing were S. epidermidis (n=67, 50%), S. haemolyticus (n=39, 29.1%), and S. hominis (n=15, 11.2%) followed by S. capitis, S. warneri, and S. lentus (9.7%; Table 1). The results of MALDI-TOF analysis showed 100% agreement with those of tuf sequencing for all strains. The Vitek^® 2 Compact and conventional methods exhibited identification discrepancies compared to the standard method and incorrectly identified 9.7% and 23.2% of the bacterial isolates, respectively (Table 2). The conventional method could not properly distinguish all species included in this study such as S. caprae, and S. simulans and was not able to identified S. capitis (Table 1 and Table 2). The kappa index for tuf gene sequencing and the conventional phenotyping, Vitek^® 2 Compact, and MALDI-TOF MS methods was 0.63, 0.85, and 1.00, respectively (data not shown). The susceptibility profile of the bacterial isolates was 92.5% (124/134) resistance to oxacillin. In addition, the mecA gene was not detected in two strains (1.5%). In addition, all sample strains were sensitive to daptomycin, linezolid, and vancomycin.

TABLE 1:
Summary of results of CoNS clinical isolate species identification using different methods.

Microorganism	tuf gene	MALDI-TOF	Vitek® 2	Conventional phenotyping
	strains identified by indicated method [n (%)]
S. capitis	10 (7.5)	10 (7.5)	9 (6.7)	-
S. caprae	-	-	-	1 (0.7)
S. epidermidis	67 (50.0)	67 (50.0)	59 (44.0)	84 (62.7)
S. haemolyticus	39 (29.1)	39 (29.1)	40 (30.0)	38 (28.4)
S. hominis	15 (11.2)	15 (11.2)	20 (14,9)	6 (4.5)
S. lentus	1 (0.7)	1 (0.7)	1 (0,7)	-
S. simulans	-	-	-	1 (0.7)
S. warneri	2 (1.5)	2 (1.5)	5 (3.7)	4 (3.0)

• CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight;S.: Staphylococcus.

TABLE 2:
Performance of methods used to identify species of CoNS clinical isolates.

Microorganism	Strains identified by the indicated method (n)
	tuf gene	MALDI-TOF		Vitek® 2		Conventional phenotyping
		correct	incorrect	correct	incorrect	correct	incorrect
S. capitis	10	10	-	9	1	-	10
S. epidermidis	67	67	-	58	9	63	4
S. haemolyticus	39	39	-	36	3	35	4
S. hominis	15	15	-	15	-	3	12
S. lentus	1	1	-	1	-	-	1
S. warneri	2	2	-	2	-	2	-
Total (%)	134 (100.0)	134 (100.0)	-	121 (90.3)	13 (9.7)	103 (76.8)	31 (23.2)

• CoNS: coagulase-negative staphylococci; matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight;S.: Staphylococcus.

Species identification of CoNS is still a challenge for most clinical laboratories; the results are often unsatisfactory, unreliable, and irreproducible. The conventional and Vitek^® 2 Compact methods have limitations in distinguishing between CoNS; however, genotypic techniques, while accurate, are costly and require specialized professionals and equipment that are not available in clinical laboratories. Vitek^® 2 Compact exhibited better results than the conventional phenotypic test and could provide a more rapid alternative for improving the laboratory workflow, despite a few discrepancies, which have been observed by other authors as well⁴. A number of previous studies support the use of MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Loonen et al., compared Vitek^® 2, gene sequencing identification (tuf gene), and MALDI-TOF MS using 142 clinical CoNS isolates; their results indicate that MALDI-TOF showed the best results, identifying 92.3% (131/142) of the isolates¹. Dubois et al. Carpaij et al. compared tuf gene sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS using clinical CoNS isolates and reference strains and showed that MALDI-TOF is an accurate method for distinguishing between species (99.3% and 100% accuracy, respectively)^14,15. Identification by MALDI-TOF MS represents an innovation for microbiological diagnosis allowing differentiation between a wide variety of bacterial species with high accuracy, efficiency, and speed. In this study, the results of MALDI-TOF MS showed high agreement (100%) with those of tuf gene sequencing (Table 1 and Table 2), indicating that MALDI-TOF MS is a promising and cost-effective alternative method for identifying CoNS in clinical microbiology settings. Studies with a larger number of isolates should be performed with a greater variety of species of CoNS, in order to confirm our findings for the purpose of early diagnosis and guidance of antibiotic therapy of infections caused by CoNS.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Loonen AJM, Jansz AR, Bergland JNB, Valkenburg M, Wolffs PFG, van den Brule AJC. Comparative study using phenotypic, genotypic, and proteomics methods for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1437-9.
• ²
  Delport JA, Peters G , Diagre D, Lannigan R, John M. Identification of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci by the Bruker MALDI-TOF Biotyper Compared To the Vitek 2 and MIS Gas Liquid Chromatography. J Bacteriol Mycol. 2015;1:1-5.
• ³
  Cunha MDLRS, Sinzato YK, Silveira, LVA. Comparison of methods for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99(8):855-60.
• ⁴
  Heikens E, Fleer A, Paauw A, Florijn A, Fluit AC. Comparison of Genotypic and Phenotypic Methods for Species-Level Identification of Clinical Isolates of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol . 2005;43(5):2286-90.
• ⁵
  Antunes ALS, Secchi C, Reiter KC, Perez LRR, Freitas ALP, d'Azevedo PA. Feasible identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis using desferrioxamine and fosfomycin disks. APMIS. 2008;116:16-20.
• ⁶
  Tomazi T, Gonçalves JL, Barreiro JR, Braga PAC, Silva LFP, Eberlin MN, et al. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine intramammary infection by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol . 2014;52:1658-63.
• ⁷
  Bizzini A, Greub G. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, a revolution in clinical microbial identification. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(11):1614-9.
• ⁸
  Hwang SM, Kim MS, Park KU, Song J, Kim EC. Tuf gene sequence analysis has greater discriminatory power than 16S rRNA sequence analysis in identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol . 2011;49(12):4142-9.
• ⁹
  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard - Ninth edition. CLSI document M07-A09/Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2012.
• ¹⁰
  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 24^th Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24/Wayne, PA: CLSI ; 2014.
• ¹¹
  Hedin G, Löfdahl S. Detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis--disc diffusion, broth breakpoint or polymerase chain reaction? APMIS . 1993;101:311-8.
• ¹²
  Bignardi GE, Woodford N, Chapman A, Johnson A P, Speller DC. Detection of the mec-A gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillinresistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37(1):53-63.
• ¹³
  Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1997;33(1):159-74.
• ¹⁴
  Dubois D, Leyssene D, Chacornac JP, Kostrzewa M, Schmit PO, Talon R, et al. Identification of a variety of Staphylococcus species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol . 2010;48(3): 941-5.
• ¹⁵
  Carpaij N, Willems RJL, Bonten MJM, Fluit AC. Comparison of the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and tuf sequencing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30(10):1169-72.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jan-Feb 2018

History

• Received
  15 May 2017
• Accepted
  12 Sept 2017