SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52Evaluation of the transcriptional immune biomarkers in peripheral blood from Warao indigenous associate with the infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosisSchistosomiasis in the Middle Paranapanema river region, state of São Paulo, Brazil: Does it matter today for public health? índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

  • Inglês (pdf)
  • Artigo em XML
  • Como citar este artigo
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Tradução automática

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical

versão impressa ISSN 0037-8682versão On-line ISSN 1678-9849

Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.52  Uberaba  2019  Epub 06-Jun-2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0375-2018 

Major Articles

Epidemiological and clinical profile of infective endocarditis at a Brazilian tertiary care center: an eight-year prospective study

Paulo Vieira Damasco1  2  3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5025-4007

Julio Cesar Delgado Correal3 

Ana Carolina Da Cruz-Campos4 

Bruno Reznik Wajsbrot5 

Rodrigo Guimarães da Cunha5 

Aloysio Guimarães da Fonseca5 

Márcia Bueno Castier5 

Claudio Querido Fortes6 

João Carlos Jazbick5 

Elba Regina Sampaio de Lemos7 

John Wilhelmus Rossen8 

Robson de Souza Leão1  4  5 

Raphael Hirata Junior1  4  5 

Ana Luíza de Mattos Guaraldi1  4  5 

1Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

2Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

4Programa de Pós-Graduação em Microbiologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

5Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

6Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

7Laboratório de Hantaviroses e Rickettsioses, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

8Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.


Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a systemic infectious disease requiring a multidisciplinary team for treatment. This study presents the epidemiological and clinical data of 73 cases of IE in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

METHODS

This observational prospective cohort study of endocarditis patients during an eight-year study period described 73 episodes of IE in 70 patients (three had IE twice). Community-associated (CAIE) and healthcare-acquired infective endocarditis (HAIE) were diagnosed according to the modified Duke criteria. The collected data included demographic, epidemiologic, and clinical characteristics, including results of blood cultures, echocardiographic findings, surgical interventions, and outcome.

RESULTS:

Analysis of data from the eight-year study period and 73 cases (70 patients) of IE showed a mean age of 46 years (SD=2.5 years; 1-84 years) and that 65.7% were male patients. The prevalence of CAIE and HAIE was 32.9% and 67.1%, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus (30.1%), Enterococcus spp. (19.1%), and Streptococcus spp. (15.0%) were the prevalent microorganisms. The relevant signals and symptoms were fever (97.2%; mean 38.6 + 0.05°C) and heart murmur (87.6%). Vegetations were observed in the mitral (41.1%) and aortic (27.4%) valves. The mortality rate of the cases was 47.9%.

CONCLUSIONS:

In multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure (relative risk [RR]= 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.55), septic shock (RR= 2.19; 95% CI 1.499-3.22), and age over 60 years (RR= 2.28; 95% CI 1.44-3.59) were indirectly associated with in-hospital mortality. The best prognosis was related to the performance of cardiovascular surgery (hazard ratio [HR]= 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.99).

Keywords: Infectious endocarditis; HAIE; CAIE; Staphylococcus aureus; Enterococcus spp.; Streptococcus spp.

INTRODUCTION

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a systemic infection for which a multidisciplinary team is required to approach treatment of this life-threatening disease1-4. In past years, the overall incidence of IE in the general population in developed nations has ranged between 3 and 10 cases per 100,000 individuals per year. However, recent epidemiological studies have suggested an increasing incidence of IE5,6. Despite trends toward earlier diagnosis and surgical intervention in IE patients in the 21st century, in-hospital mortality rates have not improved over the last three decades2,3,5. In developed countries, IE is associated with high mortality rates of approximately 20%, despite medical and surgical advances3,5,7. In low- and middle-income countries, the mortality of IE ranges from 19 to 46%8. In these countries, the morbidity and mortality rates of IE are similar to those reported in the middle of the 20th century in North America and European countries7,8.

The aim of this observational and prospective cohort study, which started in June 2009 at the Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto (HUPE), was to evaluate the epidemiological, microbiological, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of 73 cases of definitive IE in a major urban teaching Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. An overview of infective endocarditis in low- and middle-income countries in 2002-2017 was also performed.

METHODS

The HUPE is a 600-bed public medical hospital facility that serves as both a tertiary care referral center and a primary and secondary care institution for public assistance security (Sistema Único de Saúde -SUS/Brazil). The HUPE provides care in all medical and surgical specialties and subspecialties.

Study design

The study was developed as an observational prospective cohort study, over a period of 97 months, from June 2009 to June 2017, at HUPE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to which 92,634 patients were admitted in the last eight years. The database consists of 73 episodes in 70 patients (three had IE twice) with infective endocarditis (IE) who were all interviewed by the same senior infectious diseases physician (IDP). Community-associated (CAIE) and healthcare-acquired infective endocarditis (HAIE) were diagnosed according to the modified Duke criteria. Two major or one major (typical microorganism for IE from two separate blood cultures, evidence of endocardial involvement, new valvular regurgitation) and three minor clinical criteria (predisposing heart condition or intravenous drug use, fever, vascular or immunologic phenomena, echocardiogram findings consistent with IE but not meeting major criteria, blood culture but not meeting major criteria, or serologic evidence of active infection with organism consistent with IE) were used. The major clinical criteria included positive blood culture and evidence of endocardial involvement. The minor clinical criteria were fever >38.0o C, predisposing heart conditions, and vascular or immunologic phenomena2. These criteria were used for definite diagnosis or rejection of IE cases.

HAIE subjects were categorized as either IE-manifesting, occurring >48h after hospital admission, or IE-acquired, in association with a significant invasive procedure performed in the six months preceding the following situations: (a) a stay and/or treatment in a hospital setting (nosocomial health-associated IE); or (b) patients with extensive outpatient contact with health-care interventions9.

The collected data included demographic characteristics, epidemiologic and clinical data in first medical care in the hospital, results of blood cultures, echocardiographic findings, cardiac surgical interventions, and outcomes. Mortality was defined as in-hospital death.

Clinical data

After patient anamnesis by the IDP, all relevant clinical variables for this study such as time between the onset of symptoms, fever, chills, myalgia, arthralgia, back pain, pleuritic pain, abdominal pain, headache, dyspnea, prostration, weight loss, heart murmur, change of murmur, arterial emboli, Osler sign, Janeway lesions, petechiae, Roth spots, and comorbidities were recorded in patient questionnaires.

Echocardiographic data

Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography was performed at the echocardiography service of HUPE. All echocardiography exams in which IE was suspected were reviewed by an expert in echocardiography.

Microbiological data

Bloodstream samples were collected, placed in at least three aerobic bottles (Plus Aerobic), and incubated for five days in a BACTEC 9240 blood culture instrument (BATEC/ALERT®, BioMérieux, Durham, NC, USA). Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using an automated VITEK 2 System (BioMérieux). Additionally, the vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by E-test and microdilution for Enterococcus sp. and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA), respectively.

MecA and SCCmec typing were carried out by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis that generated specific amplification patterns for SCCmec types I, II, III, IV, and V10; in addition, molecular characterization based on multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed for all MRSA isolates11.

Microorganisms obtained from blood culture or after valve biopsies were identified by 16SrRNA sequencing or by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). Serological and molecular Coxiella burnetii analyses were performed in all blood culture-negative endocarditis cases (BCNE) using an indirect immunofluorescence assay (Focus Diagnostics TM, Cypress, CA, USA) and PCR amplification of a fragment of the repetitive element IS1111 of a heat-shock protein gene12.

Statistical analysis

Data were input to Excel 2007 and analyzed using STATATM version 9.1. A descriptive analysis of the variables was performed. The relative risks (RRs) or hazard ratio (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for categorical variables, and v2 or Fisher’s exact tests for expected values of <5 were also used to determine statistical significances. Logistic regression was used to examine the potential associations between variables and multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors independently associated with mortality. Variables with p >0.05 were excluded from the final model. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the institutional board of HUPE (CAAE: 01247512.3.0000.5259).

RESULTS

Demographic and Epidemiologic findings

Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and complication data in the cohort of IE patients are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Epidemiology, etiology, and outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) among inpatients from an urban university hospital. 

Cases of IE in HUPE 73
Average age (years) 46.0 + 2.5
Male sex 48 (65.7)
Time to IE diagnosis (mean ± SD, day) 27.5 ± 3.7
Diagnosis of IE on admission 28 (38.4)
Type of IE
Community-associated 24 (32.9)
Healthcare-associated 49 (67.1)
Blood culture
Blood culture performed 73 (100)
Blood cultures collected (mean ± SD) 3.5 ± 0,3
Negative blood culture 8(10.9)
Positive blood culture 65 (89.0)
Staphylococcus aureus 22 (30.1)
MSSA 16 (21.9)
MRSA 6 (8.2)
Coagulase-negative Staphylococci 7 (9.5)
Streptococcus spp 11 (15.0)
Viridans group Streptococcus 8 (10.9)
Streptococcus mutans 2 (2.7)
Streptococcus agalactiae 1 (1.3)
Abitrophia defective 1 (1.3)
Enterococcus spp 14 (19.1)
VRE (E. faecium) 4 (5.4)
Enterococcus faecalis 10 (13.6)
HACEK 0 (0.0)
Gram-Negative bacilli non-HACEK 6 (8.2)
Serratia marcences 3 (4.1)
Burkholderia cepacea 1 (1.3)
Acinetobacter baumannii complex 1 (1.3)
Escherichia coli 1 (1.3)
Corynebacterium spp. 1 (1.3)
Microbacterium testaceum 1 (1.3)
Yeasts 3 (4.1)
Candida spp. 2 (2.7)
Rhodotorula muscilaginosa 1 (1.3)
Discharge from hospital 38 (52.0)
Mortality rate in CAIE 8 (10.9)
Mortality rate in HAIE 27 (36.9)
Mortality rate 35 (47.9)

HUPE: Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto; MRSA: vancomycin-resistant S. aureus; VRE: vancomycin-resistant enterococci; HACEK: Haemophilus species; Aggregatibacter species; Cardiobacterium hominis; Eikenella corrodens; Kingella species. CAIE: community-associated Infective endocarditis; HAIE: healthcare-acquired infective endocarditis.

In the past eight years, 73 cases (70 patients) with IE were followed-up, with 0.75 episodes per 1,000 patients in the university hospital. The mean age of the patients was 46 (SD 2.5 years) (range: 1-84 years) and 65.7% of patients were male. The mortality rate of all cases of IE was 47.9%.

The results of two-dimensional transthoracic (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) of the 73 cases showed a mean diameter of valve vegetation of 1.3 ± 0.1 cm. In all IE cases, the mitral valve (41.1%) was the most frequent site of vegetation, followed by the aortic valve (27.4 %). Most patients developed native endocarditis (90.4%).

Clinical data

All 73 cases of IE fulfilled the Duke criteria. Only 38.4% of patients had classic clinical evidence of IE at hospital admission (Table 1). The clinical signs and symptoms that helped the physicians to diagnose IE upon admission to the university hospital are described. The median time between symptom onset and hospital admission was 27.5 ± 3.7 days. The most relevant classical signs and symptoms of IE were fever (97.2%; mean 38.6 ± 0.05°C) and heart murmur (87.6%). Change in heart murmur was observed in only 17.8% of patients and the following stigmas of IE were found: arterial embolic phenomenon (20.5%), Janeway lesion (5.5 %), petechiae (4.1%), and Roth spot (4.1%). The principal antecedent factors in our cohort were central venous catheterization (43.8%), hemodialysis (32.8%), antecedents of IE (16.4%), rheumatic fever (12.3%), previous dental manipulation (9.5%), and intravenous additive (1.3%) (Table 2).

TABLE 2: Echocardiographic, risk factors and clinical findings of 73 cases of infective endocarditis (IE). 

Clinical findings of IE patients Number (%) Major antecedent factors Number (%)
Vegetation 70 (95.8) Rheumatic fever 9 (12.3)
Vegetation diameter (mean ± SD, cm) 1.3 ± 0.1
Compromised valve Congenital heart disease 12 (16.4)
Mitral 30 (41.1) Mitral prolapse 10 (13.7)
Aortic 20 (27.4) Prior IE episode 12 (16.4)
Mitral-aortic 10 (13.7) Intracardiac devices 12 (16.4)
Tricuspid 10 (13.7) Central venous catheterization 32 (43.8)
Other 3 (4.1) Hemodialysis 24 (32.8)
Native valve 66 (90.4) HIV positive 7 (9.6)
Mechanical valve 7 (9.5) Dental procedure 7 (9.6)
Valvular abscess 8 (10.9) Urinary tract manipulation 3 (4.1)
Dehiscence of prosthesis 2 (2.7) Corticosteroid therapy 12 (16.4)
Signals and symptoms Prior cardiac valve surgery 11 (15.0)
Heart murmur 64 (87.6) Intravenous additive 1 (1.3)
Change in heart murmur 13 (17.8) Comorbidities
Murmur of mitral regurgitation 42 (57.5) Chronic renal insufficiency 27 (36.9)
Arterial emboli 15 (20.5) Diabetes mellitus 8(10.9)
Pulmonary infarction 2 (2.7) HAS 8(10.9)
Intracerebral hemorrhage 1 (1.4) Polycystic renal disease 3 (4.1)
Janeway lesions 4 (5.5) transplant renal 7(9.5)
Petechiae 3 (4.1) Polipose intestinal 1 (1,3)
Roth spots 3 (4.1) Cardiomyopathy 4(5.4)
Glomerulonephritis 2 (2.7) Hematologic neoplasia 5(6.8)
Rheumatoid factor 2 (2.7) Solid neoplasm 4(5.4)
Temperature (38,6 ± 0,05, °C) 71 (97.2) Cirrhosis hepatic 2(2.7)
Chills 13 (17.8) SLE 1 (1.3)
Myalgia 9 (12.3) Complications
Arthralgia 17 (23.3) Splenic infarction 6 (8.2)
Backache 14 (19.2) Splenic abscess 2 (2.7)
Pleuritic pain 1 (1.4) Mycotic aneurysm 4 (5.4)
Chest pain 13 (17.8) Septic embolization CNS 6 (8.2)
Abdominal pain 14 (19.1) Acute renal failure 18 (24.6)
Headache 10 (13.7) Sepsis 19 (26.0)
Dyspnea 25 (34.2) Septic shock 14 (19.1)
Prostration 30 (41.1) Congestive heart failure 11 (15.0)
Weight loss 28 (38.3) Cardiac shock 6 (8.2)

HAS: arterial hypertension; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; CNS: central nervous system.

Our data also showed a higher number of patients with different types of comorbidities, including chronic renal failure in 27 patients (36.9%), diabetes mellitus in eight patients (10.9%), HIV in seven patients (9.5%), kidney transplants in seven patients (9.5%), and neoplasia six patients (8.2%) (Table 2).

The prevalence of CAIE and HAIE was 32.9% and 67.1%, respectively. Of the 73 IE cases, 32.8% were classified as non-nosocomial HAIE and 34.3% as classical nosocomial IE, as previously described1. Only three patients developed a second episode of endocarditis during the study period (Table 1). The most frequent complications due to IE were sepsis (26.0%), acute renal failure (24.6%), and septic shock (19.1%) (Table 2).

Prevalence of identified organisms in IE

At least three blood cultures were collected from each patient, resulting in 89.0% positive blood cultures, whereas only 9.6% remained without an identified etiology. In total, an isolate was obtained in 90.4% of cases (89.0% of cases of IE with positive blood culture and one with a positive valve culture) (Table 1).

The classic agents of IE included S. aureus (30.1% of cases), Enterococcus spp. (19.1%) and Streptococcus spp. (15.0%). Six of the S. aureus isolates were methicillin resistant and contained the mecA gene. The MIC for vancomycin by microdilution ranged from 0.5 to 2.0 µg mL-1. Analysis of the MRSA strains by MLST revealed five different sequence types (ST) (1, 5, 25, 105, and 188). Among MRSA strains, the SCCmec types included I, II, and IV. PVL toxin genes were detected in 33.3% of all MRSA strains (ST105 and ST1). In addition, two of six MRSA isolates belonged to known epidemic lineages (USA400 and USA800).

Four cases (5.4%) of IE due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) were found. MRSA and VRE strains were only diagnosed in HAIE patients.

As mentioned, Streptococcus spp. was identified in 15.0% of patients with IE in Rio de Janeiro. The viridans group was isolated most frequently (10.9% of all IE cases). Non-hemolytic S. mutans was isolated from two positive cases and one β-hemolytic S. agalactie strain was also isolated. The MIC E-test values for penicillin G ranged from 0.094 to 0.016 µg mL-1. In addition, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS, seven strains; 9.5%) and Abiotrophia defectiva (one strain; 1.5%) were also identified.

The prevalence of IE caused by Gram-negative bacteria was 8.2%, corresponding to six patients. Five patients developed HAIE after Gram-negative bacteremia in our hospital, in which vascular catheters were the major source of these microorganisms. Three bacteremia cases were due to Serratia marcescens, one to Burkholderia cepacea, one to Acinetobacter baumannii complex, and one to Escherichia coli.

One patient developed CAIE due to E. coli bacteremia from a urinary infection. E. coli analysis by whole genome sequencing (WGS) identified the isolate as ST-69. The isolate was resistant to ampicillin, trimethoprim, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and had different virulence genes associated with iron uptake systems (aer, chuA, fepA, fhuA, fhuE, fyuA, irp2, and sitA) and adhesion (fimH and fimA).

Endocarditis due to rare and fastidious pathogens (ERFP)

Endocarditis due to rare and fastidious pathogens (ERFP) similar to Bartonella spp., Tropheryma whipplei, Coxiella burnetii, Corynebacterium spp., and fungi has been previously reported18. In our cohort, five patients had ERFP, four patients of which had HAIE. Two developed IE after candidemia. The other two cases of HAIE are described hereafter. The first case involved a woman with a kidney transplant who was investigated for fever of unknown origin (FUO), from which we isolated Rhodotorula mucilaginosa in aortic valve culture. In the second case, Corynebacterium spp. was initially found in the blood culture. However, 16S rRNA sequencing identified Microbacterium testaceum. Only one patient developed CAIE due to Corynebacterium spp.

Serological and molecular analyses of Coxiella burnetii were performed in all blood culture-negative endocarditis cases (BCNE) using an indirect immunofluorescence assay. One case showed serological evidence for C. burnetii but Q fever was excluded because the male patient was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus with Libman-Sacks endocarditis and antiphospholipid syndrome (Table 2).

Statistical analysis

In bivariate analysis, after comparisons of in-hospital mortality and discharged hospital patients, age (56 ± 3,4 years), mitral-aortic valve involvement, VRE, chronic renal failure, sepsis and septic shock, and the lack of cardiovascular surgery to treat active endocarditis were significantly associated with mortality (p <0.05) (Table 3). As expected, the best prognosis was for patients with valve and cardiovascular surgery (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.99; p <0.05) (Table 3). In multivariate analysis, only chronic renal failure (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.01-2.55; p <0.05), septic shock (RR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.499-3.22; p <0.01) and age over 60 years (RR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.44-3.59; p <0.01) were indirectly associated with in-hospital mortality (Table 4).

TABLE 3: Univariate analysis of the risk of mortality in 73 cases with infective endocarditis (IE). 

Variable Discharge from hospital In-hospital mortality p-value
Age (mean, yr) 37.8 ± 3.2 56 ± 3,4 <0.01
Mitral-aortic 9 (23.7) 1 (2.8) <0.05
Tricuspid 7 (18.4) 3 (8.5) <0.05
VRE - 4 (12.1) <0.05
Chronic renal failure 10 (26.3) 17 (48.5) <0.05
Sepsis 4 (10.5) 15 (42.8) <0.01
Septic shock 2 (5.2) 12 (34.3) <0.01
Surgery to treat the current IE episode 17 (44.7) 7 (20) <0.05

VRE: vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

TABLE 4: Multivariate analysis of the risk of mortality in 73 patients with infective endocarditis. 

Variable RR 95%CI p-value
Chronic renal failure 1.60 1.01-2.55 <0.05
Septic shock 2.19 1.49 -3.22 <0.01
Age>60 years 2.28 1.44 -3.59 <0.01

RR: relative risk; CI: confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

IE is a life-threatening systemic infectious disease, in which a multidisciplinary group of specialists is required for the case treatment and follow-ups2. Despite IE being a rare pathology, its incidence has increased in developed countries and few studies are available in developing countries2,6. Endocarditis is the fourth most important life-threating infectious syndrome after urosepsis, pneumonia, and intra-abdominal sepsis in medical departments in developed countries13.

In this IE cohort, the prevalence of CAIE and HAIE was 32.9% and 67.1%, respectively. In addition, 32.8% were episodes of non-nosocomial HAIE and 34.3% were nosocomial IE. Therefore, a higher prevalence of HAIE was observed than those reported in recent epidemiological studies of IE in low- and middle-income countries7,8.

In this investigation, the main etiologic agents identified in blood culture were S. aureus (30.1%), Enterococcus spp. (19.1%), and Streptococcus spp. (15.0%). Among the 49 cases of HAIE, the most prevalent agents were S. aureus (38.7%), Enterococcus spp., (20.4%), and CNS (10.2%). The principal etiology in 24 episodes of CAIE was Streptococcus spp. (45.8%). Our findings show that S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. are emerging agents of IE in Rio de Janeiro. This scenario has probably changed because a higher proportion of our patients had classic risks for S. aureus or Enterococcus spp. bacteremia, as observed previously14-17.

All patients with MRSA bacteremia as the cause of IE developed HAIE and we did not observe any case of MRSA due to CAIE. Among the six MRSA IE cases, five different STs were found, in which two isolates were related to known epidemic lineages (USA400/ST1/SCCmec IV and USA 800/ST105/SCCmec IV). Some epidemic clones with worldwide distribution can be identified by the characterization of SCCmec, ST, and PVL, as we presented in our results.

The in-hospital mortality in six patients with MRSA IE was 50%. In the present cohort, 100% (n=4) of the patients with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium HAIE died during treatment. The overall in-hospital mortality was 47.9% and 10.9% and 36.9% in the CAIE and HAIE patient groups, respectively. We observed the best outcome in the group of patients that received clinical and surgical treatment for the IE episode, according to the guidelines for the management of IE2.

In most developing countries, the epidemiology of IE remains similar to the rates reported in North America and Europe in the twentieth century; the disease often affects a younger age group, is associated with rheumatic heart disease, and is predominantly caused by streptococci6,8. The present study showed a different scenario in Rio de Janeiro, where, in 73 cases of IE, S. aureus was the most frequent cause of IE, followed by Enterococcus spp and Streptococcus spp. The current epidemiology of IE in Brazil may be more similar to that of North America, where S. aureus and Enterococcus spp are the most significant agents of IE16,18.

In general, the prevalence of positive blood cultures in IE patients was 87.6%. Figure 1 reviews 21 IE studies performed in low- and middle-income countries during the same period of our investigation. The authors specified the frequency of positive and negative blood cultures and only elicited papers included studies presenting the data for etiology, prevalence of CAIE and HAIE, and outcome of disease. This resulted in 3,592 patients with IE, as defined by the Duke criteria, of which 2,362 (65.7%) and 1,109 (30.8%) had positive and negative blood culture results, respectively (Figure 1). Among the positive blood cultures, Streptococcus spp. was isolated in 852 cases (23.7%), S.aureus in 687 (19.1%), and Enterococcus spp. in 102 (2.8%). The prevalence of CAIE and HAIE were 46-94% and 9-56.3%, respectively. The mortality rate of inpatients was 7.3-46.4%.

FIGURE 1: Review of IE studies in low- and middle-income countries. References:1,20-39

The difference in the etiology of IE and outcome in our study may have been due to the high proportion of patients with many comorbidities and the low prevalence of rheumatic heart disease. The principal comorbidities in our patients with IE were chronic renal insufficiency (36.9%), diabetes mellitus (10.9%), kidney transplantation, and neoplasia (8.2%), similar to those observed in the ICE cohort study18. In our series, one reason for the high prevalence of S.aureus and Enterococcus spp. IE may have been due to the fact that many patients had vascular devices (Table 2) compared to the proportions in other studies of IE in developing countries.

The most relevant classical signs and symptoms of IE were fever (97.2%), and heart murmur (87.6%), similar to those found in other studies19. The classic Oslerian manifestations of endocarditis were present only in 38.4% of patients with IE at admission, which corroborates to the indication for echocardiography in cases of bacteremia due to Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. in teaching hospitals2-5,19.

In our multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.01-2.55; p <0.05), septic shock (RR 2.19; 95% CI 1.499-3.22; p <0.01), and age over 60 years (RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.44-3.59; p <0.01) were indirectly association with in-hospital mortality. As expected, the best prognosis was for valve and cardiovascular surgery (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.99; p <0.05).

In our review of IE in developed countries, we had access to only 12 studies that included data from multivariate analysis of in-mortality rates in IE patients. These studies showed statistically significant relationships for age over 45 years, dialysis, chronic renal failure, septic shock, heart failure, prosthetic dysfunction, nosocomial IE, neoplasia, mobile vegetation, mental alteration, central nervous system emboli, coronary artery disease, aortic vegetation, and large vegetation.

The experience from a single teaching hospital and failure to investigate all patients by transesophageal echocardiography may have been limiting factors in the results of the present study. However, this eight-year prospective study of endocarditis highlights the epidemiologic and microbiologic features in Brazilian hospitals. In the near future, further investigation will be developed in different hospital centers.

In conclusion, among 73 episodes of IE reported in the last eight years in our hospital, located in the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro, S. aureus, Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. were the main causes of infection. Enterococcus spp. was also identified as an emerging etiology agent of HAIE in our country.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Prof Dr. Raphael Hirata Junior, who passed away, for his eternal friendship and intellectual contributions during this project.

REFERENCES

1. Damasco PV, Ramos JN, Correal JC, Potsch MV, Vieira VV, Camello TC, et al. Infective endocarditis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a 5-year experience at two teaching hospitals. Infection. 2014;42(5):835-42. [ Links ]

2. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(44):3075-128. [ Links ]

3. Ambrosioni J, Hernandez-Meneses M, Téllez A, Pericàs J, Falces C, Tolosana JM, et al. The changing epidemiology of infective endocarditis in the Twenty-first Century. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2017;19(5):21. [ Links ]

4. Mestres CA, Paré JC, Miró JM, Working Group on Infective Endocarditis of the Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Organization and Functioning of a Multidisciplinary Team for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: A 30-year Perspective (1985-2014). Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68(5):363-8. [ Links ]

5. Que Y-AI, Moreillon P. Infective endocarditis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(6):322-36. [ Links ]

6. Pant S, Patel NJ, Deshmukh A, Golwala H, Patel N, Badheka A, et al. Trends in infective endocarditis incidence, microbiology, and valve replacement in the United States from 2000 to 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(19):2070-6. [ Links ]

7. Yew HS, Murdoch DR. Global trends in infective endocarditis epidemiology. Curr Infect Dis Rep . 2012;14(4):367-72. [ Links ]

8. Njuguna B, Gardner A, Karwa R, Delahaye F. Infective endocarditis in low- and middle-income countries. Cardiol Clin. 2017;35(1):153-63. [ Links ]

9. Lomas JM, Martínez-Marcos FJ, Plata A, Ivanova R, Gálvez J, Ruiz J, et al. Healthcare-associated infective endocarditis: an undesirable effect of healthcare universalization. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(11):1683-90. [ Links ]

10. Boye K, Bartels MD, Andersen IS, Møller JA, Westh H. A new multiplex PCR for easy screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec types I-V. Clin Microbiol Infect . 2007;13(7):725-7. [ Links ]

11. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(3):1008-15. [ Links ]

12. Mares-Guia MA, Rozental T, Guterres A, Ferreira MS, Botticini RG, Terra AK, et al. Molecular identification of Q fever in patients with a suspected diagnosis of dengue in Brazil in 2013-2014. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(5):1090-4. [ Links ]

13. Bayer AS, Bolger AF, Taubert KA, Wilson W, Steckelberg J, Karchmer AW, et al. Diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis and its complications. Circulation. 1998;98(25):2936-48. [ Links ]

14. Sy RW, Kritharides L. Health care exposure and age in infective endocarditis: results of a contemporary population-based profile of 1536 patients in Australia. Eur Heart J . 2010;31(15):1890-7. [ Links ]

15. Munita JM, Arias CA, Murray BE. Enterococcal endocarditis: can we win the war? Curr Infect Dis Rep . 2012;14(4):339-49. [ Links ]

16. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati G, Kainer MA, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13):1198-208. [ Links ]

17. Asgeirsson H, Thalme A, Weiland O. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis - epidemiology and outcome: a review. Infect Dis (Lond). 2018;50(3):175-92. [ Links ]

18. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler Jr, VG Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):463-73. [ Links ]

19. Crawford MH, Durack DT. Clinical presentation of infective endocarditis. Cardiol Clin . 2003;21(2):159-66. [ Links ]

20. Kanafani ZA, Mahfouz TH, Kanj SS. Infective endocarditis at a tertiary care center in Lebanon: predominance of streptococcal infection. J Infect. 2002;45(3):152-9. [ Links ]

21. Tariq M, Alam M, Munir G, Khan MA, Smego Jr RA. Infective endocarditis: a five-year experience at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Int J Infect Dis. 2004;8(3):163-70. [ Links ]

22. Garg N, Kandpal B, Garg N, Tewari S, Kapoor A, Goel P, et al. Characteristics of infective endocarditis in a developing country-clinical profile and outcome in 192 Indian patients, 1992-2001. Int J Cardiol. 2005;98(2):253-60. [ Links ]

23. Ferreiros E, Nacinovich F, Casabé JH, Modenesi JC, Swieszkowski S, Cortes C, et al. Epidemiologic, clinical, and microbiologic profile of infective endocarditis in Argentina: a national survey. The Endocarditis Infecciosa en la República Argentina-2 (EIRA-2) Study. Am Heart J. 2006;151(2):545-52. [ Links ]

24. Hsu CN, Wang JY, Tseng CD, Hwang JJ, Hsueh PR, Liau CS. Clinical features and predictors for mortality in patients with infective endocarditis at a university hospital in Taiwan from 1995 to 2003. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134(3):589-97. [ Links ]

25. Leblebicioglu H, Yilmaz H, Tasova Y, Alp E, Saba R, Caylan R, et al. Characteristics and analysis of risk factors for mortality in infective endocarditis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(1):25-31. [ Links ]

26. Letaief A, Boughzala E, Kaabia N, Ernez S, Abid F, Ben Chaabane T, et al. Epidemiology of infective endocarditis in Tunisia: a 10-year multicenter retrospective study. Int J Infect Dis . 2007;11(5):430-3. [ Links ]

27. Trabelsi I, Rekik S, Znazen A, Maaloul I, Abid D, Maalej A, et al. Native valve infective endocarditis in a tertiary care center in a developing country (Tunisia). Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(9):1247-51. [ Links ]

28. Nunes MC, Gelape CL, Ferrari TC. Profile of infective endocarditis at a tertiary care center in Brazil during a seven-year period: prognostic factors and in-hospital outcome. Int J Infect Dis . 2010;14(5):e394-8. [ Links ]

29. Math RS, Sharma G, Kothari SS, Kalaivani M, Saxena A, Kumar AS, et al. Prospective study of infective endocarditis from a developing country. Am Heart J . 2011;162(4):633-8. [ Links ]

30. Elbey MA, Akdağ S, Kalkan ME, Kaya MG, Sayın MR, Karapınar H, et al. A multicenter study on experience of 13 tertiary hospitals in Turkey in patients with infective endocarditis. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2013;13(6):523-7. [ Links ]

31. Mirabel M, André R, Barsoum Mikhail P, Colboc H, Lacassin F, Noël B, et al. Infective endocarditis in the Pacific: clinical characteristics, treatment and long-term outcomes. Open Heart. 2015;30(1):e000183. [ Links ]

32. Mirabel M, Rattanavong S, Frichitthavong K, Chu V, Kesone P, Thongsith P, et al. Infective endocarditis in the Lao PDR: clinical characteristics and outcomes in a developing country. Int J Cardiol . 2015;180:270-3. [ Links ]

33. Şimşek-Yavuz S, Şensoy A, Kaşıkçıoğlu H, Çeken S, Deniz D, Yavuz A, et al. Infective endocarditis in Turkey: aetiology, clinical features, and analysis of risk factors for mortality in 325 cases. Int J Infect Dis . 2015;30:106-14. [ Links ]

34. Xu H, Cai S, Dai H. Characteristics of infective endocarditis in a Tertiary Hospital in East China. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166764. [ Links ]

35. Pazdernik M, Kautzner J, Sochman J, Kettner J, Vojacek J, Pelouch R. Clinical manifestations of infective endocarditis in relation to infectious agents: an 8-year retrospective study. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016;160(2):298-304. [ Links ]

36. El-Chakhtoura N, Yasmin M, Kanj SS, Baban T, Sfeir J, Kanafani ZA. A 27-year experience with infective endocarditis in Lebanon. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10(6):734-39. [ Links ]

37. Heydari B, Karimzadeh I, Khalili H, Shojaei E, Ebrahimi A. Infective endocarditis; report from a main referral teaching hospital in Iran. Iran J Pharm Res. 2017;16(1):390-8. [ Links ]

38. Fernandes E, Olive C, Inamo J, Roques F, Cabié A, Hochedez P. Infective endocarditis in French West Indies: a 13-year observational study. Am J Trop Med Hyg . 2017;97(1):77-83. [ Links ]

39. Zhu W, Zhang Q, Zhang J. The changing epidemiology and clinical features of infective endocarditis: aa retrospective study of 196 episodes in a teaching hospital in China. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):113. [ Links ]

Financial Support: This work was supported by grants from CAPES, FAPERJ, CNPq, SR-2/UERJ, and UNI RIO.

Recebido: 12 de Outubro de 2018; Aceito: 16 de Abril de 2019

Corresponding Author: Paulo Vieira Damasco. e-mail:paulovieiradamasco@gmail.com

in memoriam

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest and affirm that there was no financial affiliation (e.g., employment, direct payment, stock holdings, retainers, consultantships, patent licensing arrangements or honoraria), or involvement with any commercial organization with a direct financial interest in the subject or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License