SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52Determination of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in Escherichia coli isolated from Turkish patients with urinary tract infectionDifferences in resistance profiles and virulence genes among methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus of different lineages at a public tertiary hospital índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

  • Inglês (pdf)
  • Artigo em XML
  • Como citar este artigo
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Tradução automática

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical

versão impressa ISSN 0037-8682versão On-line ISSN 1678-9849

Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.52  Uberaba  2019  Epub 18-Jul-2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0061-2019 

Major Article

Synanthropic triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): infestation, colonization, and natural infection by trypanosomatids in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Andressa Noronha Barbosa-Silva1  2 

Rita de Cássia Moreira de Souza3 

Liléia Diotaiuti3 

Lúcia Maria Abrantes Aguiar4 

Antonia Cláudia Jácome da Câmara2 

Lúcia Maria da Cunha Galvão1  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6207-4502

Egler Chiari1 

1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Parasitologia, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil.

3Instituto René Rachou-FIOCRUZ Minas, Triatomine Research Group, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

4Secretaria de Estado da Saúde Pública do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil.


Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The ecoepidemiological situation in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil is characterized by frequent invasion and colonization of domiciliary units (DUs) by several triatomine species, with high rates of natural infection by Trypanosoma cruzi.

METHODS: We evaluated the possibility of vector transmission of T. cruzi based on records of the occurrence of domiciled triatomines collected by the Secretariat of State for Public Health from 2005 to 2015. During this period, 67.7% (113/167) of municipalities conducted at least one active search and 110 recorded the presence of insects in DUs. These activities were more frequent in municipalities considered to have a high and medium-level risk of T. cruzi transmission.

RESULTS

Of 51,569 captured triatomines, the most common species were Triatoma brasiliensis (47.2%) and T. pseudomaculata (40.2%). Colonies of T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, T. petrocchiae, Panstrongylus lutzi, and Rhodnius nasutus were also recorded in the intradomicile and peridomicile. Natural infection by trypanosomatids was detected in 1,153 specimens; the highest rate was found in R. nasutus (3.5%), followed by T. brasiliensis (2.5%) and T. pseudomaculata (2.4%). There have been high levels of colonization over the years; however, not all infested DUs have been sprayed.

CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of intradomicile and peridomicile colonization by P. lutzi. These results demonstrate the risk of new cases of infection by T. cruzi and reinforce the need for continuous entomological surveillance in the State of Rio Grande do Norte.

Keywords: Triatominae; Trypanosomatids; Natural infection; Entomological surveillance

INTRODUCTION

More than a century after the discovery of human infection by Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas, 1909), Chagas disease remains a serious public health problem. It is endemic to 21 countries of Latin America, and the number of infected individuals is estimated to be around 6-7 million1, among whom 12,000 die annually2; in addition, more than 70 million people are at risk of infection1.

Among the transmission mechanisms of T. cruzi, classic vector transmission remains the most important parasite transmission route to humans because of the natural distribution of T. cruzi in triatomine species adapted to domestic or peridomestic environments. Of the 155 species of triatomine described (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), including two fossil species, more than 60 are autochthonous in Brazil3-5. However, vector competence which includes the ability to adapt and colonize the domiciliary environment and the consequent infection of humans and domestic animals is limited to only some species6. The Chagas Disease Control Program was set up in the 1970s to prevent human-vector contact through the use of residual-action insecticides in infested DUs, resulting in the interruption of domestic transmission by Triatoma infestans Klug, 1834, an allochthonous species and the most important vector in Brazil from an epidemiological standpoint7. However, it is noteworthy that there are no records of the presence of this vector in the State of Rio Grande do Norte8.

The autochthonous species Triatoma brasiliensis Neiva, 1911, Triatoma pseudomaculata Corrêa & Espínola, 1964, Triatoma petrocchiae Pinto & Barreto, 1925, Triatoma melanocephala Neiva & Pinto, 1923, Panstrongylus diasi Pinto & Lent, 1946, Panstrongylus lutzi Neiva & Pinto, 1923, Panstrongylus megistus Burmeister, 1835, Psammolestes tertius Lent & Jurberg, 1965, and Rhodnius nasutus Stål, 1859 have been found in artificial and wild environments9-12.

The first seroepidemiological survey conducted in Rio Grande do Norte indicated a prevalence of 15.5% of individuals infected13. A recent seroepidemiological survey performed among dwellers in municipalities of the West and Central mesoregions showed an estimated seroprevalence of 6.5% and 3.3%, respectively14. Despite the decline in prevalence rates and incidence of infection, the possibility of vector transmission cannot be ruled out. This hypothesis is supported by the diagnosis of T. cruzi infection in a child living in a rural area of Várzea municipality (Agreste Mesoregion) whose mother had negative serologic test results15. In addition, the high potential for recolonization of the artificial environment by T. brasiliensis after chemical treatment results in the population remaining continuously exposed to risk of infection16,17. In this context, knowledge of the diversity, geographic distribution, and natural infection rate of autochthonous triatomine species is essential to support control and surveillance activities18,19. However, this information remains scarce for the State of Rio Grande do Norte. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and territorial distribution of domiciled triatomines, natural infection by trypanosomatids, and entomological surveillance activities using the entomological data set collected by the Secretariat of State for Public Health from 2005 to 2015.

METHODS

Study area

The State of Rio Grande do Norte, located in the Northeastern Region of Brazil, has an area of 52,811.1 km², which corresponds to 0.62% of the Brazilian territory, and an estimated population of 3.5 million. The state is divided into 167 municipalities distributed throughout four mesoregions: West, Central, Agreste, and East20. According to data from the Ministry of Health provided by the Secretariat of State for Public Health, 36 (21.6%) of the 167 municipalities are classified as having a high risk of T. cruzi transmission, 65 (38.9%) have a medium risk, and 66 (39.5%) have a low risk of transmission (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1: Stratification of risk areas for T. cruzi transmission in different mesoregions of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, according to entomological data of the Secretariat of State for Public Health from 2005 to 2015. 

Risk stratification associated with vector transmission has been proposed, to guide and sustain control actions in the states and municipalities of Brazil. Entomological, environmental and demographic indicators have been used to classify the degree of risk in each area21.

Entomological data

The database for this study, containing annual records of triatomines captured in domiciliary units (DUs) from 2005 to 2015, was provided by the Secretariat of State for Public Health, which is responsible for managing the information collected by those municipalities that have carried out epidemiological surveillance activities. Information on the occurrence of triatomine species and the developmental stage, capture site (intradomicile or peridomicile), and trypanosomatid infection rate were used in this study. Manual captures were exhaustively carried out in DUs by endemic disease control agents, without the use of insect dislodging substances. Capture time was approximately 1 hour/two agents/DU. The identification of triatomines was based on the identification key proposed by Lent and Wygodzinsky23. Parasitological examination of triatomines was conducted by abdominal compression and examination of fecal material with optical microscopy by technicians of Regional Units of Public Health of the State.

According to the Secretariat of State for Public Health, active searches in high risk and medium risk municipalities are conducted in all positive localities, in which the presence of triatomines has been registered during the previous year, as well as neighboring localities up to 1 km away. Other locations are randomly selected and included, to assess infestation. In these cases, it is recommended that all positive houses be sprayed with insecticide. In low risk municipalities, entomological surveillance is performed passively, followed by detailed entomological surveillance if triatomines are found in the DUs.

Data regarding the number of surveyed DUs, positive DUs, and sprayed DUs were also analyzed. This information was used to calculate several annual indicators recommended by the World Health Organization24 and Pan American Health Organization25, e.g., (i) infestation index (number of DUs with a presence of triatomines × 100 / number of DUs surveyed); (ii) peridomestic infestation index (number of DUs with triatomines in the peridomicile × 100 / number of peridomiciliary units examined); (iii) intradomiciliary infestation rate (number of DUs with triatomines in the intradomicile × 100 / number of intradomiciliary units examined); (iv) colonization index (number of DUs with nymphs × 100 / number of DUs with triatomines); and (v) natural infection index by trypanosomatids (number of infected triatomines × 100 / number of insects examined). According to their ecological definitions, the intradomicile corresponds to the interior of the dwelling where inhabitants sleep and the peridomicile refers to the area surrounding the dwelling that is affected by human activity26.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies and were estimated using Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). We evaluated triatomine infestation in the DUs according to risk stratification by municipality, using the Pearson chi-squared test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. The coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated using linear regression analysis to evaluate variation in the entomological indices (infestation, peridomiciliary infestation, intradomiciliary infestation, and intradomiciliary colonization) over the study period (years). Values of R2 > 0.6 were considered to indicate significant correlation.

RESULTS

Active searches for triatomines in DUs were performed at least once in 113 (67.7%) of the 167 municipalities in Rio Grande do Norte, among which 110 (65.9%) had records of infestation. During a 7- to 10-year period, active searches were performed in 27/36 (75%) and 42/65 (64.6%) of municipalities with high and medium risk for transmission of T. cruzi, respectively. However, active searches were conducted in only two (3.0%) low risk municipalities, which was much lower than that observed in municipalities with medium and high transmission risk (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

TABLE 1: Evaluation of triatomine infestation (active search) in domiciliary units of different municipalities according to risk stratification during period 2005-2015. 

Number of years evaluated in period Municipalities, n (%) p
High risk Medium risk Low risk
7 to 11 27 (75.0) 42 (64.6) 2 (3.0) < 0.001
0 to 6 9 (25.0) 23 (35.4) 64 (97.0)
Total 36 (100.0) 65 (100.0) 66 (100.0)

n (%), absolute and relative frequency.

A total of 51,569 triatomines were captured, belonging to the species T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, T. petrocchiae, P. lutzi, P. megistus, and R. nasutus. Of these, 40,386 (78.3%) insects were captured in the peridomicile and 11,183 (21.7%) in the intradomicile. Triatoma brasiliensis (47.2%) and T. pseudomaculata (40.2%) were the most frequent species, followed by R. nasutus (7.2%). In the intradomicile, T. brasiliensis corresponded to 63.31% of the specimens captured, which together with T. pseudomaculata represented 85.4% of captures in the peridomicile. Nymphs and adults of T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, T. petrocchiae, P. lutzi, and R. nasutus were captured in the intradomicile and peridomicile; this is indicative of the colonization of these environments by these species. Only adult P. megistus specimens were captured in DUs. The natural infection rate by flagellates that are morphologically similar to T. cruzi was 2.5%. Rhodnius nasutus had the highest infection index (3.5%), followed by T. brasiliensis (2.5%), T. pseudomaculata (2.4%), P. lutzi (1.4%), and T. petrocchiae (1.3%) (Table 2).

TABLE 2: Distribution of triatomines by species, developmental stage, and infection index by trypanosomatids, in the intradomicile and peridomicile during 2005-2015. 

Species Intradomicile Peridomicile Total collected Infection index (%)
A N T % A N T % n %
Triatoma brasiliensis 4,219 2,861 7,080 63.31 11,215 6,048 17,263 42.75 24,343 47.20 2.5 (559/22,507)
Triatoma pseudomaculata 2,455 1,061 3,516 31.44 10,832 6,394 17,226 42.65 20,742 40.22 2.4 (462/(19,277)
Triatoma petrocchiae 50 2 52 0.46 125 65 190 0.47 242 0.47 1.3 (2/150)
Panstrongylus lutzi 174 40 214 1.91 1,831 486 2,317 5.74 2,531 4.91 1.4 (28/1,937)
Panstrongylus megistus 10 0 10 0.09 7 0 7 0.02 17 0.03 0 (0/17)
Rhodnius nasutus 106 205 311 2.78 2,375 1,008 3,383 8.38 3,694 7.17 3.5 (102/2,915)
Total 7,014 4,169 11,183 21.7 26,385 14,001 40,386 78.3 51,569 100 2.5 (1,153/46,803)

A: adult; N: nymph; T: total; %: percentage of total infected triatomines adult and nymphs at the intradomicile, peridomicile and total collected; Infection index (%), number of infected specimens / number of specimens examined.

The number of municipalities conducting entomological control activities has varied over the years; the highest number was in 2007 (n = 95). In 2015, there was a reduction in the number of municipalities that had performed vector control activities (data not shown). Figure 2 shows that annual averages of the entomological indicators did not present significant variations in the studied period (R2 < 0.6).

FIGURE 2: Evaluation of entomological indicators from 2005 to 2015 and coefficients of determination (R2). R2 > 0.6 was considered to indicate significant correlation. 

Triatoma brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, P. lutzi, and R. nasutus were the most widely dispersed species in the state, recorded in 106, 107, 96, and 79 municipalities, respectively. Triatoma petrocchiae was restricted to 25 municipalities located in the West and Central mesoregions. P. megistus had the lowest distribution, restricted to five municipalities of the West Mesoregion (Apodi, Assú, Caraúbas, São Rafael, and Upanema) (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3: Distribution of the six species of triatomines captured in domiciliary units of different municipalities in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil from 2005 to 2015. 

DISCUSSION

This study focused on the entomological surveillance in of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, with an emphasis on certain aspects of the ecoepidemiology of Chagas disease in different municipalities of the state. We evaluated the presence of domiciled vectors and the index of natural infection by trypanosomatids, using the entomological data set collected by the Secretariat of State for Public Health from 2005 to 2015. Triatomines were recorded in most municipalities that performed entomological surveillance through active searches during the evaluation period. In Rio Grande do Norte and several other Brazilian states, control activities are recommended and supported according to risk stratification of domiciliary transmission of T. cruzi. Thus, municipalities are classified as high, medium, and low risk, based on an ecoepidemiological scenario characterized by endemic areas with autochthonous domiciled species19,22.

Entomological surveillance was more frequent in municipalities with high and medium risk of transmission whereas in most low risk municipalities, there were fewer control activities, resulting in fewer records of the Secretariat of State for Public Health. This suggests that transmission does not occur in these municipalities. However, this discontinuity of entomological surveillance, together with the presence of native species such as T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, and P. lutzi, which have a high index of natural infection by T. cruzi in DUs as reported by Barbosa-Silva et al.10 and Vargas et al.27, suggest risk of transmission of the parasite to the rural population in Rio Grande do Norte; this risk is evidenced in a recent outbreak of oral transmission in the municipality of Marcelino Vieira27.

In this scenario, T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata were the most frequently captured in DUs. Triatoma brasiliensis is the most frequently captured species in the intradomicile9,10,22,28. Studies in the states of Rio Grande do Norte10, Ceará29-31and Pernambuco32-33 have demonstrated the predominance of these species in the peridomicile, thus corroborating our data. The peridomicile is the site of interchange between wild and domestic populations of T. brasiliensis, which poses a great challenge to control interventions34. In this sense, the proximity of DUs in semiarid regions to the wild environment favors infestation and reinfestation processes by triatomines16.

The wide distribution of P. lutzi and R. nasutus draws attention to their recorded frequency among DUs in recent years, including their tendency to form intradomiciliary and peridomiciliary colonies, as shown in our study as well as that by Silveira and Martins35. The dispersion of R. nasutus in areas near carnaúba palm trees (Copernicia prunifera) and DUs should be considered when it comes to the domiciliation process, as these insects are attracted by light or food and can invade the intradomicile29.

The registration and distribution of T. petrocchiae were limited to municipalities of the West and Central mesoregions, with a small number of specimens that were mainly captured in the intradomicile9. This species is sylvatic and its current distribution includes the states of Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, and Pernambuco28,36,37.

In recent years, the species P. megistus has been captured less frequently in DUs of Rio Grande do Norte state, and its occurrence has been restricted to five municipalities in the West Mesoregion. Among these, Apodi and Caraúbas are included in the microregion of the Chapada do Apodi area, where there are remnants of the Atlantic Forest. This species is widely distributed in the Atlantic Forest biome38, in the humid Cerrado and Caatinga. Panstrongylus megistus is important from an epidemiological standpoint because of its potential to invade and colonize domiciles and its high rates of T. cruzi infection39.

The natural infection of triatomines by trypanosomatids showed a low index among the different species. Detection of T. cruzi infection in triatomines is traditionally done via abdominal compression and examination of fecal material with optical microscopy40. This technique is inexpensive but has some limitations such as low sensitivity and low reproducibility. Moreover, it is difficult to examine the developmental stage of triatomines using this method as the insects are not alive41, and staining quality may affect the specificity of the assay, thus hindering the morphological distinction between T. cruzi and other trypanosomatides, such as Trypanosoma rangeli42. Recent data have shown that a combination of methods (e.g., direct examination, xenoculture, and polymerase chain reaction) is best for detection of T. cruzi10,43.

Nymphs of T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, P. lutzi, R. nasutus, and T. petrocchiae in DUs indicate colonization of these environments. In this study, we recorded the first occurrence of colonization by the species P. lutzi in the intradomicile and peridomicile of Rio Grande do Norte state. It is possible that this species is undergoing a domiciliation process in the state. The proximity of P. lutzi to artificial ecotopes is of concern as it is a wild species, with high reported rates of natural infection by T. cruzi in the intradomicile10.

Taken together, the data demonstrate the need to reinforce political and administrative policies to strengthen entomological surveillance. In the evaluation of chemical control measures, we found that the number of sprayed DUs was lower than the number of infested DUs. Although this practice is inadequate, it has been recurrent over the years. This factor may have led to new cases of vector transmission by T. cruzi, especially when the main vectors (T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata) are species of recognized epidemiological importance that are easily able to colonize and recolonize the artificial environment. Continuous and permanent control activities must be reinforced in endemic areas, to prevent the reestablishment of new foci of infestation in DUs. These efforts should include educational activities aimed at physical improvement and management of peridomestic ecotopes, especially those that commonly serve as shelters for these species16.

The presence of infected triatomines, especially T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata that can colonize the intradomicile, serve as a warning regarding the risk of parasite transmission. Our results also point to invasive species that have been acquiring epidemiological importance in the state, such as P. lutzi and R. nasutus. Therefore, to avoid contact with these vectors by animals and humans, entomological surveillance activities must be continuously carried out in high and medium risk municipalities and should be conducted more frequently in municipalities considered to have low risk. Moreover, vector control must be systematic to prevent domiciliary transmission of T. cruzi.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to the Secretariat of State for Public Health, represented by the health authorities and health agents of the Municipal Offices, for their indispensable support in field activities and for the provision of data during the development of this research. We would also like to express to thank Ana Lídia da Costa for drawing the maps and to Rand Randall Martins from the Departamento de Farmácia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde/UFRN for his help with statistical analysis.

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90(6):33-43. [ Links ]

2. Morilla MJ, Romero EL. Nanomedicines against Chagas disease: an update on therapeutics, prophylaxis and diagnosis. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2015;10(3):465-81. [ Links ]

3. Oliveira J, Alevi KCC. Taxonomic status of Panstrongylus herreri Wygodzinsky, 1948 and the number of Chagas disease vectors. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50(3):434-35. [ Links ]

4. Dorn PL, Justi SA, Dale C, Stevens L, Galvão C, Lima-Cordón R, Monroy C. Description of Triatoma mopan sp. n. from a cave in Belize (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). ZooKeys. 2018;775:69-95. [ Links ]

5. Lima-Cordón RA, Monroy MC, Stevens L, Rodas A, Rodas GA, Dorn PL, Justi SA. Description of Triatoma huehuetenanguensis sp. n., a potential Chagas disease vector (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). Zookeys. 2019;820:51-70. [ Links ]

6. Dias JCP. Human Chagas Disease and Migration in the Context of Globalization: Some Particular Aspects. J Trop Med. 2013;2013:1-9. [ Links ]

7. Dias JCP. Doença de Chagas: sucessos e desafios. Cad Saúde Pública. 2006;22(10):2020-1. [ Links ]

8. Dias JCP, Machado EMM, Fernandes AL, Vinhaes MC. General situation and perspectives of Chagas disease in Northeastern region, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública . 2000;16(2):13-34. [ Links ]

9. Costa J, Almeida CE, Dotson EM, Lins A, Vinhaes M, Silveira AC, et al. The epidemiologic importance of Triatoma brasiliensis as a Chagas disease vector in Brazil: a revision of domiciliary captures during 1993-1999. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98(4):443-9. [ Links ]

10. Barbosa-Silva AN, Câmara ACJ, Martins K, Nunes DF, Oliveira PIC, Azevedo PRM, et al. Characteristics of Triatomine infestation and natural Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2016;49(1):57-67. [ Links ]

11. Almeida CE, Faucher L, Lavina M, Costa J, Harry M. Molecular Individual-Based approach on Triatoma brasiliensis: inferences on triatomine foci, Trypanosoma cruzi natural infection prevalence, parasite diversity and feeding sources. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(2):e0004447. [ Links ]

12. Barbosa-Silva AN, Diotaiuti L, Câmara AJC, Oliveira PIC, Galvão LMC, Chiari E, et al. First report of Psammolestes tertius Lent & Jurberg, 1965 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) in Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil. Check List. 2018;14(6):1109-13. [ Links ]

13. Lucena DT, Lima ET. Epidemiologia da doença de Chagas no Rio Grande do Norte, III - A infecção humana determinada pela reação de Guerreiro Machado. Rev Bras Malariol D Trop. 1962;15:361-6. [ Links ]

14. Brito CRN, Sampaio GHF, Câmara ACJ, Nunes DF, Azevedo PRM, Chiari E, et al. Seroepidemiology of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the semiarid rural zone of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2012;45(3):346-52. [ Links ]

15. Ostermayer AL, Passos ADC, Silveira AC, Ferreira AW, Macedo A, Prata AR. The national survey of seroprevalence for evaluation of the control of Chagas disease in Brazil (2001-2008). Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2011;44(Suppl. 2):108-21. [ Links ]

16. Diotaiuti L, Farias-Filho OF, Carneiro FCF, Dias JCP, Pires HHR, Schofield CJ. Operational aspects of Triatoma brasiliensis control. Cad Saúde Pública . 2000;16(2):61-7. [ Links ]

17. Garcia MHM, Pinto CT, Lorosa ES, Souza MCR, Diotaiuti L. Spraying food sources with pyrethroid to control peridomestic triatomines. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2013;46(5):633-6. [ Links ]

18. Abad-Franch F, Diotaiuti L, Gurgel-Gonçalves R, Gürtler RE. Certifying the interruption of Chagas disease transmission by native vectors: cui bono? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz . 2013;108(2):251-4. [ Links ]

19. Dias JCP, Ramos Jr AN, Gontijo ED, Luquetti A, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Coura JR, et al. 2nd Brazilian Consensus on Chagas Disease, 2015. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2016;49(Suppl. I):1-59. [ Links ]

20. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Anuário Estatístico do Brasil. 2016. Cited 2017 September 10. Avaliable from: Avaliable from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/ufs/download/mapa_e_municipios.php?uf=rn . [ Links ]

21. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Consenso Brasileiro em Doença de Chagas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2005;38(Suppl 3):1-29. [ Links ]

22. Silveira AC, Dias JCP. The control of vectorial transmission. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2011;44(Suppl. 2):52-63. [ Links ]

23. Lent H, Wygodzinsky PW. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas’ disease. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1979;163(3):127-520. [ Links ]

24. World Health Organization (WHO). Control of Chagas Disease. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Technical Report Series 811. Geneva WHO; 1991. 95 p. [ Links ]

25. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Norma tecnica de prevencion y control de la enfermidad de Chagas. Ministério de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social. República de El Salvador; 2007. 58 p. [ Links ]

26. Bos R. The importance of peridomestic environmental management for the control of the vectors of Chagas Disease. Rev Argent Microbiol. 1988;20(supl):58-62. [ Links ]

27. Vargas A, Malta JMAS, Costa VMD, Cláudio LDG, Alves RV, Cordeiro GDS, et al. Investigation of an outbreak of acute Chagas disease outside the Amazon Region, in Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil, 2016. Cad Saúde Pública . 2018;34(1):e00006517. [ Links ]

28. Silveira AC, Vinhaes MC. Chagas disease: the epidemiological and control aspects. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 1998;31:15-60. [ Links ]

29. Sarquis O, Borges-Pereira J, Mac Cord JR, Gomes TF, Cabello PH, Lima MM. Epidemiology of Chagas disease in Jaguaruana, Ceará, Brazil. I. Presence of triatomines and index of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in four localities of a rural area. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz . 2004;99(3):263-70. [ Links ]

30. Sarquis O, Sposina R, Oliveira TG, Mac Cord JR, Cabello PH, Borges-Pereira J, Lima MM. Aspects of peridomiciliary ecotopes in rural areas of Northeastern Brazil associated to triatomine (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) infestation, vectors of Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz . 2006;101(2):143-7. [ Links ]

31. Sarquis O, Carvalho-Costa FA, Toma HK, Georg I, Burgoa MR, Lima MM. Eco-epidemiology of Chagas disease in northeastern Brazil: Triatoma brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata and Rhodnius nasutus in the sylvatic, peridomestic and domestic environments. Parasitol Res. 2012;110(4):1481-5. [ Links ]

32. Silva MBA, Barreto AVMS, Silva HA, Galvão C, Rocha D, Jurberg J, et al. Synanthropic triatomines (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil: geographical distribution and natural Trypanosoma infection rates between 2006 and 2007. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2012;45(1):60-5. [ Links ]

33. Silva MBA, Menezes KR, Siqueira AM, Balbino VQ, Lorosa ES, Farias MCG, et al. Importância da distribuição geográfica dos vetores da doença de Chagas em Pernambuco, Brasil, em 2012. Rev Patol Trop. 2015;44(2):195-206. [ Links ]

34. Borges EC, Dujardin JP, Schofield CJ, Romanha AJ, Diotaiuti L. Dynamics between sylvatic, peridomestic and domestic populations of Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Ceará State, Northeastern Brazil. Acta Trop. 2005;93(1):119-26. [ Links ]

35. Silveira AC, Martins E. Histórico do controle da transmissão vetorial e situação epidemiológica atual. In: Galvão C editor. Vetores da doença de Chagas no Brasil. 1st ed. Curitiba: Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia; 2014. p. 10-25. [ Links ]

36. Galvão C, Carcavallo RU, Rocha DS, Jurberg J. A checklist of the current valid species of the subfamily Triatominae Jeannel, 1919 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) and their geographical distribution, with nomenclatural and taxonomic notes. Zootaxa. 2003;202(1):1-36. [ Links ]

37. Caranha L, Gurgel-Gonçalves R, Ramalho RD, Galvão C. New Records and geographic distribution map of Triatoma petrocchiae Pinto and Barreto, 1925 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Check List . 2011;7(4):508-9. [ Links ]

38. Forattini OP. Biogeography, origin and distribution of triatominae domicile dispersal in Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública. 1980;14(3):265-99. [ Links ]

39. Gurgel-Gonçalves R, Galvão C, Costa J, Peterson AT. Geographic distribution of Chagas disease vectors in Brazil based on ecological niche modeling. J Trop Med . 2012;2012:1-15. [ Links ]

40. Junqueira ACV, Gonçalves TCM, Moreira CJC. Manual de capacitação na detecção de Trypanosoma cruzi para microscopistas de malária e laboratoristas da rede pública. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2011. 300 p. [ Links ]

41. Pizarro JC, Lucero DE, Stevens L. PCR reveals significantly higher rates of Trypanosoma cruzi infection than microscopy in the Chagas vector, Triatoma infestans: high rates found in Chuquisaca, Bolivia. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:66. [ Links ]

42. Vinhaes MC, de Oliveira SV, Reis PO, de Lacerda Sousa AC, Silva RA, Obara MT, et al. Assessing the vulnerability of Brazilian municipalities to the vectorial transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi using multi-criteria decision analysis. Acta Trop . 2014;137:105-10. [ Links ]

43. Dworak ES, Araújo SM,Gomes ML, Massago M, Ferreira EC, Toledo MJO. Sympatry influence in the interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi with triatomine. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2017;50(5):629-37. [ Links ]

Financial Support: This work was supported by research grants from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico MCTI/CNPq/Universal number 475572/2013-0 (EC); MCTI/CNPq/MS-SCTIE-Decit number 404056/2012-1 (LMCG); Programa Nacional de Incentivo à Parasitologia Básica/CAPES number 23038.005288/2011-48 (ACJC); and a scholarship from CAPES (ANBS).

Recebido: 01 de Fevereiro de 2019; Aceito: 31 de Maio de 2019

Corresponding author : Dra. Lúcia M.C. Galvão. e-mail: galvao@icb.ufmg.br

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License