SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52Prevalence of urodynamic changes with risk for upper urinary tract damage in neuroschistosomiasis patientsAnti-Candida and anti-quorum sensing activity of airborne microorganisms detected by a rapid method author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical

Print version ISSN 0037-8682On-line version ISSN 1678-9849

Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.52  Uberaba  2019  Epub Jan 17, 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0140-2018 

Short Communication

Popular names for bushmaster (Lachesis muta) and lancehead (Bothrops atrox) snakes in the Alto Juruá region: repercussions for clinical-epidemiological diagnosis and surveillance

Ageane Mota da Siva1  2 

Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro3  4 

Paulo Sérgio Bernarde2  5 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-7817

1Instituto Federal do Acre, Campus de Cruzeiro do Sul, Cruzeiro do Sul, AC, Brasil.

2Programa de Pós-Graduação Bionorte - Universidade Federal do Acre - UFAC, Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil.

3Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brasil.

4Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brasil.

5Laboratório de Herpetologia, Centro Multidisciplinar, Campus Floresta, Universidade Federal do Acre, Cruzeiro do Sul, AC, Brasil.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

The popular names “surucucu” and “jararaca” have been used in literature for Lachesis muta and Bothrops atrox snakes, respectively. We present the popular names reported by patients who suffered snakebites in the Alto Juruá region.

METHODS:

Fifty-seven (76%) patients saw the snakes that caused the envenomations and were asked about their popular names and sizes.

RESULTS:

The snakes Bothrops atrox, referred to as “jararaca,” were recognized as being mainly juveniles (80.7%) and “surucucu” as mainly adults (81.8%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The name “surucucu” is used in the Alto Juruá region for the snake B. atrox, mainly for adult specimens.

Keywords: Snakebites; Ophidism; Venomous snakes; Amazonia; State of Acre

The bushmaster (Lachesis muta) is the largest venomous snake in South America, at over three meters in length. Its geographical distribution in Brazil is in the Amazon and in the Atlantic Forest from the northeastern region down to the state of Rio de Janeiro1. The name “muta,” originating from Latin, means “mute,” referring to the fact that this species resembles the rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus), but without having a rattle at the tip of the tail1. The popular name “surucucu” has been referred to in the literature by several authors for the snake Lachesis muta1,2. It occurs in low population densities in forested areas1-3 and in regional epidemiological studies, it is usually responsible for 0.3% to 4.3% of snakebites4,5. The rarity of this species is also reflected in the few existing reports of envenomations with this snake in the wild6. The conical protrusions of its scales, reminiscent of the bark of the jackfruit tree, gave rise to other popular names (pico-de-jaca and surucucu-pico-de-jaca) by which this snake is known in Amazonia and Bahia1,2.

The lancehead (Bothrops atrox) is the main cause of envenomations in the Amazon in several studies1,4,5 and is the most abundant venomous snake in forest areas and also in areas occupied by humans (pastures, crops, and even urban areas)1-3. This snake is known as “jararaca,” “surucucu-do-barranco,” and “boca-podre” in Acre7 and also by other names (e.g., comboia, japoboia e surucucurana) depending on the Amazonian region. In Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre, Bernarde and Gomes8, from the SINAN records, observed that 51.3% of the envenomations were reported as Lachesis. These authors assumed that this high incidence was an overestimation due to the regional name for the snake Bothrops atrox being “surucucu” and health professionals mistakenly assigning these envenomations to Lachesis muta.

We present here the popular names reported by patients who suffered Bothrops envenomations in Alto Juruá and were treated at the Juruá Regional Hospital in Cruzeiro do Sul (AC) and discuss the use of the popular names “jararaca” and “surucucu.

The study was conducted during an eight month period (July 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018) at the Regional Hospital of Juruá in the Municipality of Cruzeiro do Sul (Acre), which has approximately 82,000 inhabitants9 and is located in the Northwest of Brazil. The hospital receives patients suffering from snakebites in this municipality and from others in the Alto Juruá region (Mâncio Lima, Marechal Thaumaturgo, Porto Walter, and Rodrigues Alves, and also from Guajará, in the Amazonas state).

The snakes that caused the envenomations were identified from clinical and epidemiological diagnosis of the symptoms and signs that patients presented during hospital admission (probable cases) according to the types of envenomations (Bothrops, Lachesis and Micrurus) that may occur in the region8, and from laboratory tests when performed or when the snake responsible for the envenomation was taken to the hospital or photographed (confirmed cases). The cases in which the snakes were not taken to the hospital, that were asymptomatic, and had no change in blood coagulation time were considered “dry bites” or caused by colubrids and dipsadids10. The snakes, when taken to the hospital, were identified using the regional snake identification guide7 and their sizes were obtained with the aid of a tape measure.

The patients, and any other witnesses to the event, were interviewed and asked about the type of snake which had bitten the patient, and with the use of a tape measure, the size of the snake was estimated by the patient or witnesses. A board containing photographs of snakes was shown to the patient to assess whether they recognized the specimen responsible for the envenomation. The board contained color photographs of 17 common species in the Alto Juruá region7 in the order as follows: Boa constrictor, Eunectes murinus, Bothrops bilineatus, Spilotes pullatus, Lachesis muta, B. atrox (adult), Corallus batesii, Micrurus lemniscatus, Oxyrhopus melanogenys, M. hemprichii, M. remotus, B. atrox (juvenile), Epicrates cenchria, Anilius scytale, Oxybelis fulgidus, M. surinamensis, Erythrolamprus aesculapii, and E. reginae, which were only indicated by letters from A to R. Each of the species of the snake had two photographs, with the exception of B. atrox that featured two pictures of juvenile specimens and two of adult specimens. To verify if there is a tendency for B. atrox, recognized from the board of photographs as the juveniles, to be referred to as “jararaca,” and those called “surucucu” to be the adults, a chi-square test was applied, considering P <0.05 as significant.

This research is part of the project “Snakes and venomous snakes in Cruzeiro do Sul region in the state of Acre” approved by the Committee of Ethics in Research with Humans of the Doctor Heitor Vieira Dourado Foundation of Tropical Medicine (Approval number 2,084,630/2017).

During the study period, 90 patients with snakebites were treated, 75 of which were caused by Bothrops atrox (67 probable cases and 8 confirmed cases) (Figure 1) and 15 by other snakes (probably other snakes or dry bites). No envenomations caused by Lachesis muta (Figure 1) were recorded.

FIGURE 1: a) Juvenile lancehead (Bothrops atrox) mainly known as “jararaca.” b) Adult lancehead (Bothrops atrox) mainly known as “surucucu.” c) Bushmaster (Lachesis muta) mainly known as “pico-de-jaca.” Photographs by Paulo Bernarde. 

Of the 75 probable cases of Bothrops atrox envenomations, 57 patients (76%) saw the snake that caused the bite and were asked about the snake’s popular name and size (Table 1). Fifteen adult patients did not see the snake and three children, who were unaccompanied at the time of the event, could not recognize the snake or answer the questions. Of the 57 people who saw the snake, 53 (93%) recognized the species B. atrox in the photographs. Four patients claimed that they did not know the snakes’ name, but the snake was identified at the time of the event by other people as a “jararaca.” Also, in the case of a death, the case was referred to in the medical record as by being caused by a “jararaca” either by the patient or by the companion at the event site.

TABLE 1: Popular names attributed to Bothrops atrox specimens causing snakebites in Alto Juruá, their sizes (total length) (n = 57), and the recognition of photographs of juvenile and adult specimens by the patients (n = 53). J = juvenile picture recognition; A = adult picture recognition. 

Popular name N Size variation J A
Jararaca 29 (50.8%) 20-115 cm (x = 39.41 cm) 21 05
Surucucu 23 (40.3%) 49-150 cm (x = 89 cm) 04 18
Jararacuçu 04 (7%) 30-77 cm (x = 52.75 cm) 02 02
Surucucu-do-barranco 01 (1.7%) 150 cm 01

The common names of the Bothrops atrox snake referred to by the patients or their companions were mainly “jararaca” (50.8% of interviewees) and “surucucu” (40.3%) and to a lesser extent “jararacuçu” (7%) and “surucucu-do-barranco” (1.7%) (Table 1). The snakes referred to as “jararaca” were recognized on the boards as mainly juveniles (80.7%) and those referred to as “surucucu” as being mainly adults (81.8%) (Chi Square = 20.14; P <0.0001).

Our data confirm Bernarde and Gomes’8 prediction that Bothrops atrox is the main cause of envenomations in the Alto Juruá region and that it is known by the population as “jararaca” (mainly juveniles) and “surucucu” (mainly adults), as well as “jararacuçu” and “surucucu-do-barranco.” The research conducted by Pierini et al.11 in Alto Juruá to detect the presence of antibodies in the blood of 45 indigenous and riverine people who had suffered a snakebite at least once in their lives, showed that B. atrox was responsible for most of the envenomations (86%), and L. muta for 14%. Regarding the snakes responsible for envenomations (n = 250) in the study by Pierini et al.11, “surucucu” was responsible for 30.5% and “jararaca” for 27.6%. Other popular names mentioned, probably for B. atrox, were “surucucu-do-barranco” (5.7%) and “jararaca-açu” (2.9%). The name “surucucu-do-barranco” was mentioned, probably because this snake is frequently found on the margins of aquatic environments1-3. “Pico de jaca” was mentioned by 1% of the interviewees and also “cascavel” by 1%, the latter being a popular name also attributed to L. muta in Alto Juruá8 and also in some other countries (“cascabel” in Bolivia and “cascabelle” in Trinidad)1.

Health professionals should consider the clinical and epidemiological evidence as the primary criteria during the evaluation of a patient who has been bitten by a snake to make the diagnosis and decide the best treatment. In addition to this problem related to the use of popular names8, there is also a similarity in the symptoms of Bothrops and Lachesis envenomation12. We emphasize the need for the production and distribution of anti-Bothrops/Lachesis antivenom that is capable of reversing the clinical situation of patients suffering from Bothrops and Lachesis envenomation, as the popular names of these two snakes and the similar symptoms of the envenomations may contribute to misdiagnosis. In addition, there is the inefficacy of anti-Bothrops antivenom in reversing the coagulant activity of Lachesis envenomation13, which could compromise treatment in cases of misdiagnosis.

We suggest that in the creation of inventories of fauna and ethno-herpetology, as well as of snakebites, researchers pay attention to the popular names reported by the people of a region, as the same species may have different names in the same place or according to the snake’s age and also along its geographical distribution. Another recommendation is that in booklets, posters, books, and articles on snakebites, the authors use the name “surucucu-pico-de-jaca” for Lachesis muta instead of “surucucu”. Furthermore, when referring to Bothrops atrox, besides “jararaca”, write that the name “surucucu” is also used in some regions in the Amazon as the popular name for this snake14. In this way, it is easier for health professionals to associate the species of snake that the patient is referring to as responsible for the bite with the respective type of envenomation.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the directors of the Juruá Regional Hospital of Cruzeiro do Sul for the permission for this research and the entire team of doctors, nurses, nursing assistants, and other hospital staff for their support for this study.

REFERENCES

1. Campbell A, Lamar WW. The venomous reptiles of Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2004. 1,032 p. [ Links ]

2. Cunha OR, Nascimento FP. Ofídios da Amazônia: as cobras da região Leste do Pará. Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi, Ser Zool. 1993;9(1):1-191. [ Links ]

3. Martins M, Oliveira ME. Natural history of snakes in forests of the Manaus region, Central Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetol Nat Hist. 1998;6(2):78-150. [ Links ]

4. Pardal PP, Souza SM, Monteiro MR, Fan HW, Cardoso JL, França FO, et al. Clinical trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of Bothrops and Lachesis bites in the north eastern Amazon region of Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98(1):28-42. [ Links ]

5. Moreno E, Queiroz-Andrade M, Lira-da-Silva RM. Características clínicoepidemiológicas dos acidentes ofídicos em Rio Branco, Acre. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;38(1):15-21. [ Links ]

6. Lima PHS, Haddad Jr. V. A snakebite caused by a bushmaster (Lachesis muta): report of a confirmed case in State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2015;48(5):636-7. [ Links ]

7. Bernarde PS, Turci LCB, Machado RA. Serpentes do Alto Juruá, Acre - Amazônia Brasileira. Rio Branco: EDUFAC; 2017. p. 166. [ Links ]

8. Bernarde PS, Gomes JO. Serpentes peçonhentas e ofidismo em Cruzeiro do Sul, Alto Juruá, Estado do Acre, Brasil. Acta Amaz. 2012;42(1):65-72. [ Links ]

9. IBGE. Censo demográfico. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2016) Censo Demográfico. 2016. [updated 2016; cited 2018 Mar 10] Available from: Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br.Links ]

10. Silveira PVP, Nishioka SA. Non-venomous snake bite and snake bite whithout envenoming in a brazilian teaching hospital, analysis of 91 cases. Rev Inst Med trop S Paulo. 1992;34(6):499-503. [ Links ]

11. Pierini SV, Warell DA, De Paulo A, Theakston RDG. High incidence of bites and stings by snakes and other animals among rubber tappers and amazonian indians of the Juruá Valley, Acre state, Brazil. Toxicon. 1996;34(2):225-36. [ Links ]

12. Sá-Neto RP, Dos-Santos MC. Aspectos clínicos comparativos do acidente botrópico e laquético. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 1995;28(supl 1):173. [ Links ]

13. Bard R, Lima JCR, Sá-Neto RP, Oliveira SG, Santos MC. Ineficácia do antiveneno botrópico na neutralização da atividade coagulante do veneno de Lachesis muta muta. Relato de caso e comprovação experimental. Rev Inst Med trop S Paulo . 1994;36(1):77-81. [ Links ]

14. Wen FW, Málaque CMS. Acidentes por animais peçonhentos no Brasil. São Paulo: Instituto Butantan; 2013. 32p. [ Links ]

Received: April 11, 2018; Accepted: June 21, 2018

Corresponding author: Paulo Sérgio Bernarde. ORCID: 0000-0002-2191-7817 e-mail:SnakeBernarde@hotmail.com

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License