SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52Emergence of aph(3’)-VI and accumulation of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes in KPC-2-possessing Enterobacter aerogenes isolates from infections and colonization in patients from Recife-PE, BrazilComparison of methodologies for detecting Trypanosoma cruzi parasites by microscopic observation of microhematocrit capillary tubes índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical

versão impressa ISSN 0037-8682versão On-line ISSN 1678-9849

Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.52  Uberaba  2019  Epub 27-Jun-2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0502-2018 

Short Communication

Origanum vulgare L. essential oil inhibits the growth of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria

Nathalie Gaebler Vasconcelos1  2 

Júlio Croda3  4 

Késia Esther Silva1 

Maria Lorenza Leal Motta1 

Wirlaine Glauce Maciel1 

Letícia Cristina Limiere2 

Simone Simionatto1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2367-0915

1Laboratório de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, Brasil.

2Hospital Universitário de Dourados, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, Brasil.

3Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.

4Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.


Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Plant products are sources for drug development against multidrug resistant bacteria.

METHODS

The antimicrobial activity of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil (OVeo) against carbapenem-resistant strains was assessed by disk-diffusion, microdilution (REMA-Resazurin Microtiter Assay), and time kill assays.

RESULTS

Carbapenemase production was confirmed for all strains. OVeo exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.059% v/v for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens, and of 0.015 % v/v for Acinetobacter baumannii. A decrease in cell count was observed after a 4 h treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

OVeo antimicrobial effect was rapid and consistent, making it a candidate for developing alternative therapeutic options against carbapenem-resistant strains.

Keywords: Oregano; Carbapenemase; Multidrug resistance; Antimicrobial activity

The constant selective pressure associated with clinically used antibiotics has led to a high prevalence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms1, prompting scientists to explore novel sources of chemicals with antimicrobial activity. Some studies have shown that Origanum vulgare L. (oregano) essential oil (OVeo) possesses broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity even at low concentrations, inhibiting the growth of a variety of bacteria and fungi2. In addition to being used as food, oregano is easily accessible, economical, and nontoxic to human cells3.

The spread of carbapenemase genes and, consequently, of resistant strains is increasing worldwide. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, and Acinetobacter baumannii are characterized by their ability to develop resistance to many antimicrobials and are nosocomial pathogens often involved in hospital outbreaks1. Handling such infections is an ongoing clinical challenge; furthermore, the presence of carbapenemases, enzymes responsible for carbapenems resistance, is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates4. For example, carbapenemase KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase), encoded by the gene bla KPC, has a high dissemination potential because it is located within a highly conserved transposon, Tn4401, found in a plasmid transferable between species and bacterial genera1.

Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the antimicrobial activity of OVeo against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii strains and its molecular characteristics.

Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii were collected and isolated from human specimens by rectal swab, urine sample, and nasal swab, respectively. Samples were taken from patients over 50 years old, hospitalized in different wards at a tertiary hospital in Brazil’s Midwestern region. Selected isolates were maintained at -70 °C and later subcultured on MacConkey agar for 24 h before testing. Bacterial identification was performed using the Vitek® 2 system (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO) and confirmatory tests, using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), with a Microflex LT spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, MA, USA)5. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antimicrobials were determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines6. A preliminary screening for the presence of carbapenemase was performed by ertapenem hydrolysis using MALDI-TOF MS5. Commercial antibiotics, gentamicin (GEN), imipenem (IPM), and polymyxin B (POL), were used as controls for the assays and 0.5% Tween 80 was used as solvent for the OVeo. The study was conducted with the approval of the Research Ethics Committee from the Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (Process No. 877.292/2014).

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was performed to determine the presence of carbapenem-resistance genes bla CTX-M-1-like, bla CTX-M-2-like, bla CTX-M-8-like, bla CTX-M-14-like, bla GES-like, bla GIM-like, bla IMP-10, bla IMP-like, bla KPC-2 , bla NDM-like, bla OXA-23, bla OXA-48-like, bla SHV-like, bla SIM-like, bla SME-like, bla SPM-like, bla TEM-like and bla VIM-like in K. pneumoniae and S. marcescens strains1,4, and bla IMP-10, bla KPC-2, bla NDM-like, bla OXA-23, bla OXA-24, bla OXA-48, bla OXA-51, bla OXA-58, bla VIM-like in A. baumannii.

The OVeo used was a clear greenish-yellow to brown liquid with a characteristic odor, free of impurities, extracted by leaf steam distillation, and with a density of 0.954. The sample (batch and CAS number 224 and 84012-24-8, respectively) was accompanied by a technical report, approved and certified by the responsible chemical engineer of the company from which it was acquired (Ferquima Ind. Com. LTDA, São Paulo, Brazil), indicating that carvacrol (2-methyl-5-[1-methylethyl]phenol), a phenolic monoterpenoid, was the most abundant compound (71%) in the oil, followed by γ-terpinene (4.5%), β-caryophyllene (4%), p-cymene (3.5%), and thymol (3%).

The antimicrobial activity of OVeo was determined using the standard agar disk diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines6. Filter-paper disks, 6 mm in diameter, containing 5 μL of undiluted oil (absolute concentration) were gently placed on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii strains. After 30 min at room temperature (27 ± 1° C), plates were incubated at 37 ± 1 °C for 24 h and the inhibition zone’s diameter was measured (mm). POL and GEN were used as positive controls. The test was performed in duplicate and the means of the values obtained were used to classify the bacteria as either sensitive (≥ 10 mm) or resistant (< 10 mm) to the oil6.

The MIC of the OVeo was determined using broth microdilution and colorimetric assays (REMA-Resazurin Microtiter Assay)6. The effect of the addition of Tween 80 (0.5%) as an oil solubilizer on MIC was investigated and it was found that this concentration did not interfere with bacterial growth.

Time-kill assays were performed using the broth macrodilution technique following CLSI guidelines6. Both IPM and OVeo were tested using MIC values against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii strains. Time-kill assays were performed using a final inoculum concentration of approximately 1.5 × 106 colony forming units (CFU)/mL, verified spectrophotometrically using the Vitek® 2 system. Test tubes were shaken periodically and incubated at 37 °C. Samples were collected at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h. At each sampling time, 1 µL of inoculum was collected from each tube using a sterile loop, spread onto MacConkey agar plates, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C; colony counts were determined thereafter. For carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii, POL was used as the positive control, whereas GEN was used as the positive control for S. marcescens (intrinsically resistant to POL). Brain Heart Infusion broth with one of the bacterial strains was used as a negative control and a saline solution was used as sterility control.

The sensitivity of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii strains is shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. All strains were identified as carbapenemase producers using MALDI-TOF MS. PCR amplification showed that the bla KPC-2 gene was present in K. pneumoniae, bla KPC-2 and bla IMP-10 in S. marcescens, and bla OXA-23 and bla OXA-51 in A. baumannii. The OVeo exhibited significant inhibitory effects against tested bacterial strains, with MICs of 0.059 % v/v for K. pneumoniae and S. marcescens and of 0.015 % v/v for A. baumannii (Table 2).

TABLE 1: Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii (MICs in µg/mL). 

K. pneumoniae S. marcescens A. baumannii
Amikacin > 32 (R) 16 (S) 16 (S)
Ampicillin > 16 (R) > 16 (R) NR
Aztreonam > 16 (R) > 16 (R) NR
Cefoxitin > 16 (R) > 16 (R) NR
Ceftazidime 16 (R) 8 (R) > 64 (R)
Cefepime > 16 (R) 8 (R) > 64 (R)
Ciprofloxacin > 2 (R) > 2 (R) > 4 (R)
Polymyxin B ≤ 1 (S) (IR) ≤ 0.5 (S)
Ertapenem > 4 (R) > 4 (R) NR
Gentamicin > 8 (R) ≤ 2 (S) > 16 (R)
Imipenem > 8 (R) > 8 (R) > 16 (R)
Levofloxacin > 4 (R) > 4 (R) NR
Meropenem > 8 (R) > 8 (R) > 16 (R)
Nitrofurantoin > 64 (R) > 64 (R) NR
Piperacillin/Tazobactam > 64/4 (R) 64/4 (R) > 128 (R)
Tigecycline 2 (I) 4 (R) 2 (S)
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim > 4/76 (R) ≤ 1/19 (S) NR

>: more than; ≤: less or equal to; S: susceptibility, I: intermediate, R: resistance, IR: intrinsic resistance, NR: not recommended.

FIGURE 1: Inhibition diameter zones obtained by paper disk diffusion method for OVeo. (A): K. pneumoniae; (B): S. marcescens; (C): A. baumannii. GEN, gentamicin; OVeo, Origanum vulgare L. essential oil; POL, polymyxin B. 

TABLE 2: Antimicrobial action of OVeo using disk diffusion and MIC methods (concentration and percentage of the oil). 

Resistance genes Disk-diffusion MIC (% v/v)
K. pneumoniae bla KPC-2 21 mm (S) 0.059
S. marcescens bla KPC-2andbla IMP-10 12 mm (S) 0.059
A. baumannii bla OXA-23and bla OXA-51 28 mm (S) 0.015

S: sensitive.

Bacterial survival curves showed a linear decrease in viable cell counts over time (Figure 2). All three strains treated with OVeo showed decreases in cell counts of approximately 5 log10 CFU/mL. Considering the time of cell death, a total inhibition of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii growth was reached after 4 h of treatment. All cell counts reduced to zero, including those for S. marcescens, the most resistant strain from this study. In contrast, IPM showed no antibacterial activity for up to 24 h. Control antibiotics successfully inhibited these strains within 24 h, while no growth was observed in plates with saline solution.

FIGURE 2: Time-kill curves with OVeo against carbapenem-resistant strains. (A): S. marcescens; OVeo MIC of 0.059 % v/v; IPM MIC of 8 µg/mL; GEN MIC of 4 µg/mL; (B): K. pneumoniae; OVeo MIC of 0.059 % v/v; IPM MIC of 8 µg/mL; POL MIC of 1 µg/mL; (C): A. baumannii; OVeo MIC of 0.015 % v/v; IPM MIC of 16 µg/mL; POL MIC of 0.5 µg/mL. GEN, gentamicin; IPM, imipenem; MIC, Minimal Inhibitory Concentration; OVeo, Origanum vulgare L. essential oil; POL, polymyxin B; C+, positive control; C- negative control. 

Tested strains have intrinsic and acquired resistance to antimicrobial agents, specially KPC-2 and IMP-10-producing S. marcescens. Furthermore, A. baumannii and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae are considered critical in the WHO list of priority for research and development of new antibiotics, and the production of carbapenemases by pathogens intrinsically resistant to polymyxins drastically reduces available therapeutic options against them7. In this study, OVeo was investigated as a potential novel therapeutic agent and showed encouraging and significant inhibitory effects against carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The antimicrobial action of OVeo and its time-kill curves provided evidence for its potential rapid action against A. baumannii (MIC, 0.015 %v/v), K. pneumoniae (MIC, 0.059 %v/v), and S. marcescens (MIC, 0.059 %v/v). OVeo inhibited tested strains within 4 h, which was as fast as the effects of POL on A. baumannii and faster than the effects of POL and GEN against K. pneumoniae and S. marcescens, respectively. Interestingly, this susceptibility was independent of the presence of carbapenemase-resistance genes, as K. pneumoniae expressed bla KPC-2 , S. marcescens expressed bla KPC-2 and bla IMP-10, and A. baumannii expressed bla OXA-23 and bla OXA-51, indicating a mode of action unrelated to the genus, species, or resistance genes. Nevertheless, its action may be related to the gram-negative cell wall structure.

The activity of this compound against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)8, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Klebsiella oxytoca strains insusceptible to carbapenems9 has been reported. A multidrug sensitive Klebsiella strain was also reported as susceptible and moderately susceptible to OVeo with MIC values of 0.5 µg/mL2 and close to 250 µg/mL10, respectively. Collectively, these observations indicate that OVeo may interfere with membranes, the cell wall, or other cell structures11. In addition to MICs determination, our study also used the more accurate time-kill method to verify the speed at which OVeo inhibited the studied bacteria, to enhance the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of OVeo action. However, the antimicrobial action mechanism of OVeo seems complex and several pathways could be involved in its antibacterial effect. Multiple experiments would be necessary to evaluate all the possible mechanisms and provide a clearer insight into the action of OVeo.

The antimicrobial activity of essential oils can involve single or multiple targets, and therefore, their mechanisms of action could not be attributed to a unique site of action but to a cascade of reactions within the bacterial cell. Several mechanisms for the antibacterial activity of oregano have been proposed, including the impairment of a variety of enzyme systems -such as those involved in energy production and structural component synthesis11. K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and A. baumannii can produce beta-lactamases and carbapenemases, which hydrolyze and destroy antibiotics. Essential oils are naturally hydrophobic, a characteristic responsible for the disruption of the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane, increasing cell permeability, leading to leakage of cell contents, and reducing ATPase activity3.

Carvacrol, abundant in OVeo, is largely responsible for its antimicrobial activity11. Two monoterpenes, γ-terpinene and p-cymene (the carvacrol precursor), are also constituents of OVeo, but no antimicrobial activity has been reported for them12. This lack of antimicrobial activity is probably due to the absence of phenolic hydroxyl groups, since phenols are known for their membrane-disturbing activities13.

The three studied bacteria can cause infections at multiple sites in the human body, therefore, other potential activities of OVeo, apart from its antimicrobial activity, could be very useful; the oil in the natural state could play an important therapeutic role with additional antioxidant or antispasmodic activities because of its compounds8. Gram-negative bacteria are known to be more resistant to antibiotics than gram-positive bacteria because of their more complex outer membrane; and terpenes are minor components of plant essential oils that, owed to their lipidic nature, can enhance the ability of the oil to penetrate the lipid-rich gram-negative cell membrane11.

In this study, one multidrug resistant strain of each species was subjected to antibacterial analysis to investigate the potential of OVeo to suppress the growth of these hard-to-kill bacteria. Testing only one isolate of each species might be considered a limitation of the study; nevertheless, if OVeo can act on these multidrug resistant strains that have a variety of resistances and carbapenemase enzymes, then OVeo can potentially have antibacterial action.

In addition, to our knowledge, toxic effects of O. vulgare L. have not been reported thus far. Previous studies have shown that O. vulgare L. extract protects human lymphocytes against genotoxicity induced by internal irradiation, suggesting its effectiveness as a free-radical scavenger and its likely provision of concentration-dependent radioprotection, and protection against DNA damage14. Furthermore, carvacrol, the major compound of OVeo, is classified as a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) compound, approved for use in food items3. Data on the acute and short-term in vivo effects in different animal species are available and they suggest that carvacrol may not pose a risk to human health6. The oral median lethal dose (LD50) values in rats are also available for carvacrol (810 mg/kg body weight)15.

This study demonstrates the efficacy of OVeo in growth inhibition of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria associated with nosocomial infections. The antimicrobial effect was rapid and consistent, making OVeo a favorable candidate for the development of alternative treatments. This finding is significant, considering the critical need for novel sources of antibiotics to address the increasing incidence of drug- and multidrug-resistant human pathogens such as the clinical strains used in this study. Microorganisms are excellent survivors with a remarkable ability to adapt to hostile situations such as the host environment. Thus, future studies on OVeo activity and its antibacterial mechanisms in animal models are necessary to enhance our understanding of its action and establish its efficacy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the financial support and infrastructure provided by the Federal University of Grande Dourados - UFGD which made this study possible. K.E.S. and W.G.M. received scholarships from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. This study was conducted with the approval of the Research Ethics Committee from the University of Grande Dourados - UFGD (Process No. 877.292/2014).

REFERENCES

1. Silva KE, Cayô R, Carvalhaes CG, Sachi FPC, Rodrigues-Costa F, Ramos da Silva AC, et al. Coproduction of KPC-2 and IMP-10 in Carbapenem-Resistant Serratia marcescens Isolates from an Outbreak in a Brazilian Teaching Hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(7):2324-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00727-15. [ Links ]

2. Sahin F, Güllüce M, Daferera D, Sökmen A, Sökmen M, Polissiou M, et al. Biological activities of the essential oils and methanol extract of Origanum vulgare ssp. vulgare in the Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Food Control. 2004;15:549-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2003.08.009 [ Links ]

3. Hyldgaard M, Mygind T, Meyer RL. Essential oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and interaction with food matrix components. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:1-24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00012. [ Links ]

4. Silva KE, Maciel WG, Sacchi FP, Carvalhaes CG, Rodrigues-Costa F, da Silva AC, et al. Risk factors for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: watch out for surgery. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65(6):547-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2012.08.006. [ Links ]

5. Carvalhaes CG, Cayô R, Assis DM, Martins ER, Juliano L, Juliano MA, et al. Detection of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and class D beta-lactamase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii isolates by use of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol . 2013;51(1):287-90. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02365-12. [ Links ]

6. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Five Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S25, 2015. [ Links ]

7. World Health Organization (WHO). Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. Germany: WHO; 2017. 7 p. [ Links ]

8. Nostro A, Blanco AR, Cannatelli MA, Enea V, Flamini G, Morelli I, et al. Susceptibility of methicillin-resistant staphylococci to oregano essential oil, carvacrol and thymol. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;230(2):191-5. [ Links ]

9. Fournomiti M, Kimbaris A, Mantzourani I, Plessas S, Theodoridou I, Papaemmanouil V, et al. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils of cultivated oregano (Origanum vulgare), sage (Salvia officinalis) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:23289. https://doi.org/10.3402/mehd.v26.23289. [ Links ]

10. Özkalp B, Sevgi F, Özcan M, Özcan MM. The antibacterial activity of essential oil of oregano (Origanum vulgare L.). J Food Agric Environ. 2010;8(2):272-4. [ Links ]

11. Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, De Martino L, Coppola R, De Feo V. Effect of Essential Oils on Pathogenic Bacteria. Pharmaceuticals. 2013;6(12):1451-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph6121451. [ Links ]

12. Aligiannis N, Kalpoutzakis E, Mitaku S, Chinou BI. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of two Origanum species. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(9):4168-70. [ Links ]

13. Sikkema J, de Bont JAM, Poolman B. Mechanism of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59(2):201-22. [ Links ]

14. Arami S, Ahmadi A, Haeri SA. The radioprotective effects of Origanum vulgare extract against genotoxicity induced by 131I in human blood lymphocyte. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2013;28(3):201-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2012.1284. [ Links ]

15. Jenner PM, Hagan EC, Taylor JM, Cook EL, Fitzhugh OG. Food flavourings and compounds of related structure. I. Acute oral toxicity. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1964;2:327-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-6264(64)80192-9. [ Links ]

Financial Support: This work was partially supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (grant numbers 480949/2013-1, and 407791/2013-2) and the Support Foundation for the Development of Education, Science and Technology in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul (grant numbers 05/2011, and 04/2012).

Recebido: 21 de Novembro de 2018; Aceito: 16 de Abril de 2019

Corresponding author: Dra. Simone Simionatto. e-mail:simonesimionatto@ufgd.edu.br

Conflict of Interest: All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License