Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Filling gaps in the ecological knowledge on Auchenipteridae catfishes (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes): first data for Trachelyichthys exilis

ABSTRACT

The feeding habit of Trachelyichthys exilis is described for the first time, with additional comments on its growth type and size at sexual maturity. We analyzed 42 specimens from the Amanã Reserve (Amazonas state, Brazil) collected with a seine net amidst stands of floating herbaceous vegetation during the dry season of 2002. Stomach contents revealed a predominantly carnivorous habit (tending to piscivorous), an isometric growth type, and size at maturity around 5.5 cm standard length. Based on the biological characteristics of the consumed prey, we presume that T. exilis forage actively during the twilight/night around and among the root tangle of herbaceous vegetation, preying upon nocturnally active animals such as small fishes and aquatic invertebrates, and/or close to the water surface, where diurnally active prey usually rests. Our findings provide essential information to fill knowledge gaps on the natural history of auchenipterid catfishes, especially on trophic ecology.

KEYWORDS:
feeding; maturity; growth pattern; ecology; Amazonia

RESUMO

O hábito alimentar de Trachelyichthys exilis é descrito pela primeira vez, com comentários adicionais sobre seu tipo de crescimento e tamanho de maturação sexual. Nós analisamos 42 espécimes da Reserva Amanã (Amazonas, Brasil) coletados com rede de cerco em bancos flutuantes de herbáceas durante a estação seca de 2002. Conteúdos estomacais revelaram um hábito predominantemente carnívoro (tendendo a piscívoro), um tipo de crescimento isométrico e tamanho de maturação sexual em torno de 5,5 cm de comprimento padrão. Com base nas características biológicas das presas consumidas, presumimos que T. exilis forrageia ativamente durante o crepúsculo/noite ao redor e entre as raízes dos bancos flutuantes, onde captura presas noturnas como pequenos peixes e invertebrados aquáticos, e/ou próximo à superfície da água, onde geralmente repousam as presas diurnas. Nossos resultados fornecem informações essenciais para preencher lacunas de conhecimento sobre a história natural de bagres auchenipterídeos, especialmente sobre a ecologia trófica.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE:
alimentação; maturação; padrão de crescimento; ecologia; Amazônia

The family Auchenipteridae, commonly known as driftwood catfishes, is currently composed of 127 species distributed along all major South American basins (Ferraris 2003Ferraris, C.J. 2003. Family Auchenipteridae. In: Reis, R.E.; Kullander, S.O.; Ferraris Jr., C.J. (Ed.). Check List of the Freshewater Fishes of South and Central America. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, p.473-485.; Calegari et al. 2019Calegari, B.B.; Vari, R.P.; Reis, R.E. 2019. Phylogenetic systematics of the driftwood catfishes (Siluriformes: Auchenipteridae): a combined morphological and molecular analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 187: 661-773.; Fricke et al. 2022Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; van der Laan, R. 2022. Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: genera, species, references. ( (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp ). Accessed on 14 Feb 2022.
http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/re...
). In general, auchenipterids are crepuscular/nocturnal fishes that swim just below the water surface, searching for insects and macroinvertebrates that fall from the adjacent vegetation (Ferraris 2003). However, different feeding habits (e.g., carnivorous, frugivorous) can also be found among these fishes. In this context, a recent study identified that information on feeding habits is lacking for many auchenipterid representatives, including the species of Trachelyichthys [see Raunkiæran shortfalls in Freitas et al. (2021Freitas, T.M.S.; Stropp, J.; Calegari, B.B.; Calatayud, J.; De Marco, P.; Montag, L.F.A.; et al. 2021. Quantifying shortfalls in the knowledge on Neotropical Auchenipteridae fishes. Fish and Fisheries, 22: 87-104.)].

Trachelyichthys includes only two valid species, Trachelyichthys decaradiatus Mees, 1974, from Guyana (Rupununi River basin), and T. exilis Greenfield & Glodek, 1977, from Peru (Nanay River, upper Amazon basin) (Fricke et al. 2022Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; van der Laan, R. 2022. Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: genera, species, references. ( (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp ). Accessed on 14 Feb 2022.
http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/re...
). Currently, all Amazonian populations are allocated to Trachelyichthys exilis (Calegari et al. 2019Calegari, B.B.; Vari, R.P.; Reis, R.E. 2019. Phylogenetic systematics of the driftwood catfishes (Siluriformes: Auchenipteridae): a combined morphological and molecular analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 187: 661-773.).

Trachelyichthys fish are usually found hiding in aquatic plant roots such as macrophyte banks or in submerged leaf litter (Hercos et al. 2009Hercos, A.P.; Queiroz, H.L.; Almeida, H.L. 2009. Peixes ornamentais do Amanã. IDSM, Tefé, 241p.; van der Sleen and Albert 2018van der Sleen, P.; Albert, J.S. 2018. Field guide to the fishes of Amazon, Orinoco & Guianas. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 464p.). Both T. decaradiatus and T. exilis have been mentioned in fish inventories (DoNascimiento et al. 2017DoNascimiento, C.; Herrera-Collazos, E.E.; Herrera-R., G.A.; Ortega-Lara, A.; Villa-Navarro, F.A.; Usma Oviedo, J.S.; et al. 2017. Checklist of the freshwater fishes of Colombia: a Darwin Core alternative to the updating problem. ZooKeys, 708: 25-138.; Pereira et al. 2020Pereira, R.S.; Silva, R.G.A.; Morales, B.F.; Souza, S.S.; Hinnah, R.; Takahashi, E.L.H.; et al. 2020. Ichthyofauna from tributaries of Urubu and Amazonas rivers, Amazonas State, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 20: e20190839.) and show potential for exploitation in the ornamental fish trade (Hercos et al. 2009). However, no additional information on their biology or ecology is currently available. In this context, we aimed to provide the first description of the feeding habits of Trachelyichthys exilis, as well as comments on its growth type and maturity size.

The Amanã Reserve is a protected area located between the Negro River and the Japurá and Solimões rivers (1º30’-3º05’S, 62º50’-65º00’W) in Amazonas state, Brazil (Queiroz 2005Queiroz, H.L. 2005. A criação da Reserva Amanã e a consolidação do núcleo do corredor ecológico da Amazônia Central. In: Ayres, J.M.; Fonseca, G.; Rylands, A.; Queiroz, H.L.; Pinto, L.P.; Masterson, D.; Cavalcante, R. (Ed.). Os Corredores Ecológicos das Florestas Tropicais do Brasil. v.1 SCM, Belém, p.1-256.). Trachelyichthys exilis is listed as a potential ornamental fish for exploitation in the Amanã Reserve (Hercos et al. 2009Hercos, A.P.; Queiroz, H.L.; Almeida, H.L. 2009. Peixes ornamentais do Amanã. IDSM, Tefé, 241p.). Samplings were carried out in the Amanã Lake and the Juá Grande stream during the dry season of 2002, between September and November, as part of a large inventory of the ichthyofauna of the reserve. We used a fine-meshed (5 mm between opposite knots) seine net (25 m long, 4 m high) to encircle portions of stands of floating and emergent herbaceous vegetation. We sampled 60 different floating meadows (eight of which resulted in the capture of T. exilis) within an area of approximately 170 km². Sampling was carried out from 7 am to 10 am, when individuals are resting after nocturnal activity (van der Sleen and Albert 2018van der Sleen, P.; Albert, J.S. 2018. Field guide to the fishes of Amazon, Orinoco & Guianas. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 464p.).

After closing the net, the plants were removed, and the fish retained were euthanized with a lethal dose of Eugenol. Collected specimens were immediately preserved in 10% formalin, later transferred to 70% ethanol, and stored in the zoological collection of Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA-ICT 053095). In the laboratory, the specimens were measured [standard length; SL (in cm); 0.1 cm precision] and weighed [total mass; TM (in g); 0.1 g precision]. These values were used to estimate the length-weight relationship (LWR), following the model TM = a * SL b (Froese 2006Froese, R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253.), where a is the coefficient of proportionality and b is the coefficient of allometry (interpreted as the growth pattern). To identify sex-specific growth patterns, the function was initially adjusted to all individuals, comparing the residuals for males and females with a t-test (5% significance level). The LWR parameters were obtained from a non-linear regression in the R program (R Core Team 2021R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.). The study was conducted under authorization of INPA’s Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals in Scientific Studies (CEUA/INPA # 033/2012).

The abdominal cavity of each specimen was opened to determine the sex, gonadal maturation stage, and stomach contents. The classification of gonad maturation stages followed the macroscopic categories defined by Núñez and Duponchelle (2009Núñez, J.; Duponchelle, F. 2009. Towards a universal scale to assess sexual maturation and related life history traits in oviparous teleost fishes. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 35: 167-180.) for females (immature, maturing, mature, spawned, and resting) and males (immature, maturing, mature, and spent). The stomachs were dissected to examine the food items under a stereomicroscope and prey items were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level and weighed (0.001 g precision). For each item, we calculated the frequency of occurrence (FO%) as the percentage of food-containing stomachs in which a given food item occurred (Hyslop 1980Hyslop, E.J. 1980. Stomach contents analysis-a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology, 17: 411-429.), and the mass percentage (M%), as the weight contribution of a given item to the total weight of all ingested items (Hynes 1950Hynes, H.B.N. 1950. The food of fresh-water sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 19: 1-36.). Both parameters were combined into the alimentary index (Ai%) adapted from Kawakami and Vazzoler (1980Kawakami, E.; Vazzoler, G. 1980. Método gráfico e estimativa de índice alimentar aplicado no estudo de alimentação de peixes. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico, 29: 205-207.). The Ai% estimates the importance of each food item in the diet and was calculated as Ai% = (FO%*M%)/(∑FO%*M%)*100. Prey items were grouped into three food categories (fish, invertebrates, and plant remains) and FO%, M%, and Ai% were calculated for each category.

A total of 42 individuals were analyzed, of which 25 were females (5.6 ± 1.1 cm SL, range 3.9 to 8.5 cm) and 17 were males (5.5 ± 1.1 cm SL, range 3.6 to 7.5 cm). There was no significant difference in the morphometric residuals between the sexes. Hence, LWR was represented by the single equation TM = 0.025*SL 3.04 (R² = 0.961), evidencing an isometric growth type. Among females, ten specimens were classified as immature (40% of all females), six in maturing stage (24%), six mature (24%), and three resting (12%). No female in spawned stage was observed. For males, ten individuals were immature (59% of all males), two maturing (12%), four mature (24%), and one spent (6%). The immature stage was recorded for females and males up to 3.9 and 3.6 cm SL, respectively, while mature specimens were recorded at 5.5 and 5.3 cm SL for females and males, respectively.

We identified 31 food items in stomachs of 23 individuals that contained food (Table 1). Fourteen contained one, seven contained two, and one contained three food items. The most relevant food category was fish (65.2 Ai%), followed by invertebrates (20.4 Ai%), and plant remains (14.4 Ai%). The most important food items were juveniles of the pelagic engraulid fish Anchoviella jamesi (Jordan & Seale, 1926) (38.6 Ai%), followed by plant remains (35.1 Ai%) and juveniles of curimatid fishes (12.6 Ai%). Curimatids were not identified to lower taxonomic levels due to their advanced state of digestion. Other prey items were a juvenile of a doradid fish (Amblydoras sp.), a juvenile of a weakly electric eel (Hypopygus sp.), and invertebrates (e.g., ants, shrimps, and immature dragonflies) (Figure 1).

Table 1
Prey items (n = 31) retrieved from stomach contents of 23 individuals of Trachelyichthys exilis sampled in Amanã Reserve (Amazonas state, Brazil). n.i. = not identified; FO% = frequency of occurrence; M% = mass percentage; AI% = Alimentary index. The parameters were calculated per food item and per food category (bold).

Figure 1
A - Female of Trachelyichthys exilis (6.7 cm SL) and prey items retrieved from stomach contents of T. exilis from Amanã Reserve (Amazonas state, Brazil); B - Palaemonidae shrimps; C - invertebrates (Ephemeroptera nymphs); D - weakly electric eel Hypopygus sp. This figure is in color in the electronic version.

Our results evidenced a predominantly carnivorous habit (tending to piscivorous) for T. exilis, an isometric growth type, and size at maturity around 5.5 cm SL as novel biological and ecological data for the species and the genus. The maturation size should be considered with caution, as more long-term data are necessary for reliable inferences about the species’ life cycle.

Despite the relatively high proportion of empty stomachs, we assume that our sample is representative of the feeding habits of T. exilis in its natural foraging habitat in Amanã Reserve, considering that we sampled a high number of sites. High percentages of empty stomachs occurred in other studies on carnivorous fishes (Barbarino-Duque and Winemiller 2003Barbarino-Duque, A.; Winemiller, K.O. 2003. Dietary segregation among large catfishes of the Apure and Arauca Rivers, Venezuela. Journal of Fish Biology, 63: 410-427.), including auchenipterids (Pouilly et al. 2004Pouilly, M.; Yunoki, T.; Rosales, C.; Torres, L. 2004. Trophic structure of fish assemblages from Mamoré River floodplain lakes (Bolivia). Ecology Freshwater Fish, 13: 245-257. ; Sá-Oliveira et al. 2014Sá-Oliveira, J.C.; Maciel, A.G.P.; Araújo, A.S.; Isaac-Nahum, J. 2014. Dieta do Mandubé, Ageneiosus ucayalensis (Castelnau, 1855), (Osteichthyes: Auchenipteridae) do Reservatório da Usina Hidrelétrica Coaracy Nunes, Ferreira Gomes-Amapá, Brasil. Biota Amazonica, 4: 73-82.; Freitas et al. 2020Freitas, T.M.S.; Santos, W.O.; Prudente, B.S.; Montag, L.F.A. 2020. Diet and foraging behavior of Ageneiosus inermis (Teleostei, Auchenipteridae). Neotropical Biology and Conservation, 15: 209-218.). Although the prey items were not measured, it is noteworthy that all fishes were swallowed whole, despite their relatively large dimensions (see Figure 1) compared to the predator’s size. The consumed items and the nocturnal/crepuscular habit of T. exilis (van der Sleen and Albert 2018van der Sleen, P.; Albert, J.S. 2018. Field guide to the fishes of Amazon, Orinoco & Guianas. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 464p.) indicate that it actively forages around and among the roots or near the substrate of herbaceous vegetation stands for nocturnally active prey (e.g., Amblydoras sp., Hypopygus sp., shrimps, some immature aquatic insects), and/or close to the water surface, where diurnally active prey rest (e.g., Anchoviella jamesi, and curimatid species). Such behavior was also observed in other auchenipterid genera such as Ferrarissoaresia (Cabeceira et al. 2015Cabeceira, F.G.; Parisotto, D.C.; Zuanon, J.; Akama, A. 2015. The microhabitat, behavior and diet of Centromochlus meridionalis, a small catfish of Amazon streams (Teleostei: Auchenipteridae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 26: 221-228.) and Ageneiosus (Freitas et al. 2020). The ingestion of plant matter may occur accidentally along with the ingestion of animal prey within vegetation stands.

Primary data on feeding and reproduction is essential for studies on functional ecology, as, in their absence, these parameters are estimated from the most closely related taxa, potentially leading to a distorted interpretation of specific biological characteristics (Hortal et al. 2015Hortal, J.; Bello, F.; Diniz-Filho, J.A.F.; Lewinsohn, T.M.; Lobo, J.M.; Ladle, R.J. 2015. Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 46: 523-549.). Primary data are also valuable for macroecological and evolutionary research. A current study is in progress on the phylogenetic context of the diet in auchenipterid species, and the data presented herein for Trachelyichthys exilis will allow the inclusion of the genus in the analyses (Freitas et al. unpubl. data). Future efforts should focus on the feeding habits in natural conditions of other auchenipterid genera with scarce or no available information (e.g., Liosomadoras, Pseudepapterus, Pseudotatia, Spinipterus, Trachelyopterichthys).

ACKNOWLDGMENTS

We thank Michel F. Catarino and Jonas Oliveira for the help in collecting the specimen, and Lúcia H. Rapp Py-Daniel and Renildo R. de Oliveira of INPA’s Fish Collection for making the specimens available for study. JZ thanks Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for a research productivity grant (#313183/2014-7).

REFERENCES

  • Barbarino-Duque, A.; Winemiller, K.O. 2003. Dietary segregation among large catfishes of the Apure and Arauca Rivers, Venezuela. Journal of Fish Biology, 63: 410-427.
  • Cabeceira, F.G.; Parisotto, D.C.; Zuanon, J.; Akama, A. 2015. The microhabitat, behavior and diet of Centromochlus meridionalis, a small catfish of Amazon streams (Teleostei: Auchenipteridae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 26: 221-228.
  • Calegari, B.B.; Vari, R.P.; Reis, R.E. 2019. Phylogenetic systematics of the driftwood catfishes (Siluriformes: Auchenipteridae): a combined morphological and molecular analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 187: 661-773.
  • DoNascimiento, C.; Herrera-Collazos, E.E.; Herrera-R., G.A.; Ortega-Lara, A.; Villa-Navarro, F.A.; Usma Oviedo, J.S.; et al. 2017. Checklist of the freshwater fishes of Colombia: a Darwin Core alternative to the updating problem. ZooKeys, 708: 25-138.
  • Ferraris, C.J. 2003. Family Auchenipteridae. In: Reis, R.E.; Kullander, S.O.; Ferraris Jr., C.J. (Ed.). Check List of the Freshewater Fishes of South and Central America Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, p.473-485.
  • Freitas, T.M.S.; Santos, W.O.; Prudente, B.S.; Montag, L.F.A. 2020. Diet and foraging behavior of Ageneiosus inermis (Teleostei, Auchenipteridae). Neotropical Biology and Conservation, 15: 209-218.
  • Freitas, T.M.S.; Stropp, J.; Calegari, B.B.; Calatayud, J.; De Marco, P.; Montag, L.F.A.; et al 2021. Quantifying shortfalls in the knowledge on Neotropical Auchenipteridae fishes. Fish and Fisheries, 22: 87-104.
  • Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; van der Laan, R. 2022. Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: genera, species, references. ( (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp ). Accessed on 14 Feb 2022.
    » http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp
  • Froese, R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253.
  • Hercos, A.P.; Queiroz, H.L.; Almeida, H.L. 2009. Peixes ornamentais do Amanã IDSM, Tefé, 241p.
  • Hortal, J.; Bello, F.; Diniz-Filho, J.A.F.; Lewinsohn, T.M.; Lobo, J.M.; Ladle, R.J. 2015. Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 46: 523-549.
  • Hynes, H.B.N. 1950. The food of fresh-water sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 19: 1-36.
  • Hyslop, E.J. 1980. Stomach contents analysis-a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology, 17: 411-429.
  • Kawakami, E.; Vazzoler, G. 1980. Método gráfico e estimativa de índice alimentar aplicado no estudo de alimentação de peixes. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico, 29: 205-207.
  • Núñez, J.; Duponchelle, F. 2009. Towards a universal scale to assess sexual maturation and related life history traits in oviparous teleost fishes. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 35: 167-180.
  • Pereira, R.S.; Silva, R.G.A.; Morales, B.F.; Souza, S.S.; Hinnah, R.; Takahashi, E.L.H.; et al 2020. Ichthyofauna from tributaries of Urubu and Amazonas rivers, Amazonas State, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 20: e20190839.
  • Pouilly, M.; Yunoki, T.; Rosales, C.; Torres, L. 2004. Trophic structure of fish assemblages from Mamoré River floodplain lakes (Bolivia). Ecology Freshwater Fish, 13: 245-257.
  • Queiroz, H.L. 2005. A criação da Reserva Amanã e a consolidação do núcleo do corredor ecológico da Amazônia Central. In: Ayres, J.M.; Fonseca, G.; Rylands, A.; Queiroz, H.L.; Pinto, L.P.; Masterson, D.; Cavalcante, R. (Ed.). Os Corredores Ecológicos das Florestas Tropicais do Brasil v.1 SCM, Belém, p.1-256.
  • R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Sá-Oliveira, J.C.; Maciel, A.G.P.; Araújo, A.S.; Isaac-Nahum, J. 2014. Dieta do Mandubé, Ageneiosus ucayalensis (Castelnau, 1855), (Osteichthyes: Auchenipteridae) do Reservatório da Usina Hidrelétrica Coaracy Nunes, Ferreira Gomes-Amapá, Brasil. Biota Amazonica, 4: 73-82.
  • van der Sleen, P.; Albert, J.S. 2018. Field guide to the fishes of Amazon, Orinoco & Guianas Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 464p.
  • CITE AS:

    Freitas, T.M.S.; Zuanon, J. 2022. Filling gaps in the ecological knowledge on Auchenipteridae catfishes (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes): first data for Trachelyichthys exilis. Acta Amazonica 52: 158-161.

Edited by

ASSOCIATE EDITOR:

Carlos David de Santana

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    04 July 2022
  • Date of issue
    Apr-Jun 2022

History

  • Received
    17 Sept 2021
  • Accepted
    14 Mar 2022
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Av. André Araujo, 2936 Aleixo, 69060-001 Manaus AM Brasil, Tel.: +55 92 3643-3030, Fax: +55 92 643-3223 - Manaus - AM - Brazil
E-mail: acta@inpa.gov.br