Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Angiographic geometric predictors of myocardial infarction are not associated with ultrasonographic markers of plaque vulnerability

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE: Some angiographic geometric features of coronary lesions have recently been described as independent predictors of myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to correlate these geometric markers with intravascular ultrasound findings known to be associated with greater vulnerability to plaque rupture. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with stable coronary syndromes and de novo lesions (31 lesions) underwent coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each lesion, angiographic geometric features (degree of symmetry, degree of stenosis, lesion length, and outflow angle) were correlated with the following ultrasound variables: type of plaque (soft, fibrous, mixed, or calcified), plaque burden and remodeling index. RESULTS: Mean lesion length was 9.2 ± 4.4 mm, percent stenosis was 50.0% to 89.0% (mean 67.7 ± 12.1%), inflow angles ranged from 8.48º to 48.78º (mean 24.0 ± 11.4º), outflow angles ranged from 8.30º to 53.03º (mean 23.8 ± 11.7º), and the symmetry index ranged from 0 to 1 (mean 0.56 ± 0.32). On ultrasound evaluation, frequency of soft or calcified plaques, positive remodeling, and magnitude of plaque burden were not associated with any angiographic geometric feature (p > 0.05 for all analysis). CONCLUSION: Angiographic geometric features that predispose to acute occlusion do not correlate with IVUS morphologic and quantitative findings associated with plaque vulnerability.

Coronary atherosclerosis; coronary angiography; intravascular ultrasonography


OBJETIVO: Certas características geométricas angiográficas de lesões coronarianas foram descritas como preditoras independentes de um futuro infarto do miocárdio. O objetivo deste estudo foi correlacionar esses marcadores com achados do ultra-som intracoronariano sabidamente associados com maior vulnerabilidade à ruptura de placa. MÉTODOS: Estudou-se 30 pacientes com síndromes coronarianas estáveis e lesões de novo (31 lesões) com angiografia e ultra-som intracoronariano. Para cada lesão as características geométricas angiográficas (grau de simetria, grau de estenose, comprimento da lesão e ângulo de saída) foram correlacionadas com as variáveis ultra-sonográficas: tipo de placa (mole, fibrosa, mista ou calcificada), área porcentual de placa e índice de remodelamento. RESULTADOS: O comprimento médio da lesão foi de 9,2 ± 4,4 mm, o porcentual de estenose foi de 50,0% a 89,0% (média 67,7 ± 12,1%), ângulos de entrada variaram de 8,48º a 48,78º (média 24,0 ± 11,4º), ângulos de saída variaram de 8,30º a 53,03º (média 23,8 ± 11,7º) e o índice de simetria variou de 0 a 1 (média 0,56 ± 0,32). À avaliação com ultra-som intracoronariano, freqüência de placas moles ou calcificadas, remodelamento positivo e magnitude da área porcentual de placa não foram associados com nenhuma característica geométrica angiográfica (p > 0,05 para todas as análises). CONCLUSÃO: Características geométricas angiográficas que predis-põem à oclusão aguda não se correlacionam com achados morfológicos e quantitativos do ultra-som intracoronariano associados com a vulnerabilidade da placa.

Aterosclerose coronariana; angiografia coronariana; ultra-som intracoronariano


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Angiographic geometric predictors of myocardial infarction are not associated with ultrasonographic markers of plaque vulnerability

Celso Kiyochi Takimura; Pedro Alves Lemos; Marco Antonio Perin; Expedito Eustáquio Ribeiro da Silva; John Ambrose; José Antonio Franchini Ramires; Eulógio Emílio Martinez Filho

Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas – FMUSP - São Paulo, SP - Brazil

Mailing Address Mailing Address: Celso Kiyochi Takimura Rua Botelho, 155 apto 162 04313-200 – São Paulo, SP - Brazil E-mail: takimura@uol.com.br

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Some angiographic geometric features of coronary lesions have recently been described as independent predictors of myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to correlate these geometric markers with intravascular ultrasound findings known to be associated with greater vulnerability to plaque rupture.

METHODS: A total of 30 patients with stable coronary syndromes and de novo lesions (31 lesions) underwent coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each lesion, angiographic geometric features (degree of symmetry, degree of stenosis, lesion length, and outflow angle) were correlated with the following ultrasound variables: type of plaque (soft, fibrous, mixed, or calcified), plaque burden and remodeling index.

RESULTS: Mean lesion length was 9.2 ± 4.4 mm, percent stenosis was 50.0% to 89.0% (mean 67.7 ± 12.1%), inflow angles ranged from 8.48º to 48.78º (mean 24.0 ± 11.4º), outflow angles ranged from 8.30º to 53.03º (mean 23.8 ± 11.7º), and the symmetry index ranged from 0 to 1 (mean 0.56 ± 0.32). On ultrasound evaluation, frequency of soft or calcified plaques, positive remodeling, and magnitude of plaque burden were not associated with any angiographic geometric feature (p > 0.05 for all analysis).

CONCLUSION: Angiographic geometric features that predispose to acute occlusion do not correlate with IVUS morphologic and quantitative findings associated with plaque vulnerability.

Key words: Coronary atherosclerosis; coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasonography.

Acute coronary syndromes represented by unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and sudden death have been extensively associated with coronary atherothrombosis1. Plaque rupture or erosion with endothelial denudation seems to be a final common pathway, resulting in local thrombus formation and acute lumen obstruction2. However, the specific mechanisms involved in triggering this process are still unknown.

Postmortem studies have shown that "culprit" atherosclerotic plaques of patients with acute coronary syndromes have distinct characteristics when compared to "nonculprit" plaques or plaques of patients with stable chronic disease. These findings led to the concept that some plaque characteristics may render it more prone to disruption, such as large plaque burden, positive remodeling, and high lipid content, typical of the so-called vulnerable plaque3. Likewise, in clinical trials that studied the artery wall by intravascular ultrasound, increased frequency of plaques with those characteristics has been described in patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction4,5,6.

Identification of vulnerable plaques in patients with atherosclerotic disease has emerged as a field of growing interest in clinical research7. Although still considered a gold standard for diagnosing coronary disease, conventional angiography has not been commonly listed as a potential method for detecting vulnerable plaques. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that certain geometric characteristics of the lesion derived from angiographic "lumenogram" have a high predictive value for future myocardial infarction8,9. In angiograms performed within 36 months preceding an acute myocardial infarction, culprit lesions were found to be longer, more symmetrical, more severely stenotic, and with steeper outflow angle than control lesions. Arterial wall and plaque characteristics related to these morphological risk factors are yet to be described. The present study was designed to evaluate IVUS characteristics associated with angiographic risk factors for acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 30 consecutive patients (31 lesions) with stable coronary syndromes referred for percutaneous treatment of de novo lesions in native vessels owing to symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia and who underwent intravascular ultrasound before any therapeutic intervention between December 1997 and January 1999.

Exclusion criteria were recent episode of acute coronary syndrome, angiographic evidence of thrombus or plaque rupture, and ostial or bifurcation lesion. The study protocol was approved by the institution’s Ethics Committee and is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All patients signed an informed consent before entering the trial.

Angiographic analysis - Quantitative coronary angiography: Angiograms were analyzed in the view that showed the coronary lesion with higher degree of stenosis and after intracoronary administration of isosorbide mononitrate 10 mg. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed off-line using an automated edge-detection algorithm (CAAS II system, Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands), and the catheter tip was used for calibration. Minimal luminal diameter (MLD), interpolated reference diameter (IRD), percent stenosis, and lesion length were measured10.

Angiographic geometric analysis - Inflow and outflow angles were measured from the luminal diameter function curve of quantitative coronary angiography measurement. Mean lesion inflow angle was defined as average slope of the luminal diameter function curve between the most stenotic point (i.e. MLD) and proximal boundary of the stenotic segment. Likewise, mean outflow angle was defined as average slope of the luminal diameter curve between the MLD and distal boundary of the lesion (Figure 1)11. Vessel wall contours estimated by angiographic lumenogram were used to evaluate the plaque symmetry index, calculated as percent ratio between plaque areas on both sides of stenosis. Lesions with symmetry index between 0 and 0.5 were classified as eccentric, and those greater than 0.5, as concentric.


IVUS imaging - All ultrasound examinations were performed before any therapeutic intervention. A commercially available IVUS system equipped with a 30 to 40 MHz transducer (Boston Scientific Corporation/SciMed) was used, and images were acquired during automatic pullback at 0.5 mm/s. Qualitative analyses were performed according to previously established criteria12,13. Calcific plaques were brighter than the adventitia and resulted in acoustic shadowing. Fibrous plaques (hyperechoic) were as bright as or brighter than the adventitia, but with no acoustic shadowing. Soft plaques (hypoechoic) were less bright than the adventitia. When there was no dominance, the plaque was classified as mixed. Quantitative IVUS evaluations were performed at the most stenotic site and at the proximal and distal reference sites, selected as the cross-sections within 5 mm from the lesion, but before a major side branch.

The following measurements were obtained by planimetry: external elastic membrane (EEM) cross-sectional area and lumen cross-sectional area. Plaque area was calculated as the EEM area minus lumen area. Plaque burden was calculated as percent ratio between the plaque area and EEM area. The remodeling index was calculated as the ratio between EEM area at the proximal reference site and EEM area at the lesion site. Positive remodeling was defined as remodeling index greater than 1.0514.

Statistical analysis - Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and compared by Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared by ANOVA. Measurement distribution of lesion length, percent stenosis, symmetry index, plus inflow and outflow angles versus plaque burden and remodeling index were studied using linear regression analysis. Geometric angiographic variables with prognostic value for acute events (inflow and outflow angles, symmetry index, lesion length, and percent stenosis) were divided into three groups, according to terciles. IVUS findings in each group were analyzed and compared. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of the thirty patients included in the study (31 lesions) are shown in table 1. Most patients were male (70%), with a relatively high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (30%). Half of the cases had multivessel disease, and 23% had a history of myocardial infarction (in all these patients, infarct location was not related to the coronary lesion under study). The left anterior descending artery was the most frequently treated vessel, and approximately one-third of the patients had type B2 or C lesions. All procedures achieved angiographic success and were followed by good in-hospital clinical outcomes.

Quantitative coronary angiography and morphologic angiographic findings of the 31 lesions studied are shown in Table 2. On average, lesions were relatively short (9.2 ± 4.4 mm in length), located in large vessels (reference diameter 2.90 ± 0.45 mm), and with percent stenosis ranging from 50.0% to 89.0% (mean 67.7 ± 12.1%). Inflow angles ranged from 8.48º to 48.78º (mean 24.0 ± 11.4º), and outflow angles, from 8.30º to 53.03º (mean 23.8 ± 11.7º). Symmetry evaluation showed extremely eccentric (symmetry index 0) and maximal concentric lesions (symmetry index 1), with mean symmetry index of 0.56 ± 0.32.

Geometric variables (lesion length, percent stenosis, symmetry index, inflow and outflow angles) were divided into terciles. Table 3 shows IVUS findings analyzed separately for each tercile. Frequency of soft or calcific plaques, positive remodeling, and magnitude of plaque burden were not associated with any geometric feature, and no significant difference was found between tercile subgroups (P > 0.05 for all analysis). As a matter of illustration, scatterplots of individual measurements of lesion length, percent stenosis, symmetry index, inflow and outflow angles versus plaque burden and remodeling index are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively (P > 0.05 for all analysis).



DISCUSSION

In this study, angiographic factors shown to be predictive of future myocardial infarction were not associated with IVUS markers of plaque instability. Specifically, angiographic features such as percent stenosis, symmetry index, lesion length, and inflow and outflow angles were not associated with IVUS detection of soft plaque, positive remodeling or greater plaque burden.

There are many possible explanations for the lack of correlation between angiographic predictors of future events and IVUS markers of vulnerability: 1) most properties currently associated with increased plaque vulnerability, such as plaque inflammation15, thin fibrous cap16, plaque deformability17 and shear stress18, are not identifiable by conventional intravascular ultrasound; 2) the correlation between soft plaque and lipid content is weak and, in addition, IVUS image of the "soft plaque" may correspond to thrombus, lipid, necrotic tissue, or none of these; 3) in our series, mean percent stenosis was 67%, unlike those of 46% and 47% reported in previous studies that have shown the prognostic value of angiographic variables8,9. It seems reasonable to assume that, in theory, our patients might have been in a more advanced stage of coronary artery disease, which may invalidate a direct extrapolation of previous results from patients with milder coronary lesions.

Hypothetically, angiographic morphology may be affected by plaque structure and composition8. However, our findings do not support this hypothesis. Even though conventional IVUS imaging allows only a relatively rough estimate of vessel wall structure, no association was noted between geometric angiographic variables and plaque characteristics on IVUS. Despite the relatively small number of lesions included in this study, it is unlikely that a greater number of lesions would have changed these findings, because no trend towards significant correlations was found when different variables were analyzed.

Study limitations lie in the small number of patients and lesions studied. However, both patients and lesions had well-defined characteristics (de novo lesions in native vessels in patients with stable coronary syndromes and no history of infarction related to the artery studied); and were judiciously studied using two methods (coronary angiography and IVUS). Any extrapolation of our findings to other lesion and patient groups should be done cautiously.

We conclude that geometric features of coronary lesions favoring acute occlusion and myocardial infarction are not correlated with ultrasound markers of plaque vulnerability. Whether angiographic predictors of future coronary events - which are independent of IVUS markers of plaque vulnerability - are associated with other local parameters, such as flow pattern and shear stress, remains unknown and warrant further study.

Potencial Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

Received on 08/19/05

Accepted on 11/11/05

  • 1. Falk E. Unstable angina with fatal outcome: dynamic coronary thrombosis leading to infarction and/or sudden death. Circulation. 1985; 71: 699-708.
  • 2. Davies MJ, Thomas AC. Plaque fissuring the cause of acute myocardial infarction, sudden ischaemic death, and crescendo angina. Brit Heart J. 1985; 53: 363-73.
  • 3. Bezerra HG, Higuchi ML, Gutierrez PS, et al. Atheromas that cause fatal thrombosis are usually large and frequently accompanied by vessel enlargement. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2001; 10: 189-96.
  • 4. Filardo SD, Schwarzacher SP, Lo ST, et al. Acute myocardial infarction and vascular remodeling. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 760-2.
  • 5. Schoenhangen P, Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, et al. Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2000; 101: 598-603.
  • 6. Kotani J, Mintz GS, Castagna MT, et al. Intravascular ultrasound analysis of infarct-related and non-infarct-related arteries in patients who presented with an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2889-93.
  • 7. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient. A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1664-72.
  • 8. Ledru F, Théroux P, Lespérance J, et al. Geometric features of coronary artery lesions favoring acute occlusion and myocardial infarction: a quantitative angiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 1353-61.
  • 9. Taeymans Y, Théroux P, Lespérance J, Waters D. Quantitative angiographic morphology of the coronary artery lesions at risk of thrombotic occlusion. Circulation. 1992; 85: 78-85.
  • 10. Gronenschild E, Janssen J, Tijdens F. CASS II: A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994; 33: 61-75.
  • 11. Haase J, Escaned J, Swijndregt EM, et al. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation cardiovascular angiography analysis system (CAAS II). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993; 30: 104-14.
  • 12. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1478-92.
  • 13. Hodgson JM, Reddy KG, Suneja R, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound imaging: correlation of plaque morphology with angiography, clinical syndrome and procedural results in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 35-44.
  • 14. Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Vince G, et al. Arterial remodeling and coronary artery disease: the concept of "dilated" versus "obstructive" coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 297-306.
  • 15. Stefanadis C, Diamantopoulos L, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Thermal heterogeneity within human atherosclerotic coronary arteries detected in vivo: a new method of detection by application of a special thermography catheter. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1965-71.
  • 16. Loree HM, Kamm RD, Stringfellow RG, Lee RT. Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels. Circ Res. 1992; 71: 850-8.
  • 17. Loree HM, Kamm RD, Atkinson CM, et al. Turbulent pressure fluctuations on surface of model vascular stenoses. Am J Physiol. 1991; 261: H644-H650.
  • 18. Krams R, Wentzel JJ, Oomen JA, et al. Shear stress in atherosclerosis, and vascular remodeling. Semin Interv Cardiol. 1998; 3: 39-44.
  • Mailing Address:

    Celso Kiyochi Takimura
    Rua Botelho, 155 apto 162
    04313-200 – São Paulo, SP - Brazil
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      28 Sept 2006
    • Date of issue
      Aug 2006

    History

    • Accepted
      11 Nov 2005
    • Received
      19 Aug 2005
    Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: revista@cardiol.br