Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

B-type natriuretic peptide assessment in the diagnosis of rejection after pediatric heart transplant

Abstracts

BACKGROUND: Rejection is one of the major causes of mortality following pediatric heart transplant. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been studied as a method for the diagnosis of acute rejection, especially in adult patients undergoing heart transplant. OBJECTIVE: To correlate serum BNP levels with acute rejection as diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy in patients of the pediatric heart transplant group. METHODS: A total of 50 BNP samples were collected from 33 children in the postoperative period of heart transplant, and data on age, gender, skin color, blood group, immune panel, follow-up time after transplant, functional class, immunosuppressive regimen used and number of rejections were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty three children with median age of 10.13 years were analyzed; of these, 54% were females and 78% were Caucasians. BNP levels were determined at a mean time from transplant of 4.25 years. Nine episodes of rejection were diagnosed in eight patients (27%) by means of endomyocardial biopsy; of these, three were grade 3A, five were grade 2, and one had humoral rejection. At the moment of biopsy, most patients were asymptomatic. The mean serum BNP level was 77.18 pg/ml, with 144.22 pg/ml in the group with rejection and 62.46 pg/ml in the group without rejection, with p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic children can present acute rejection in the postoperative period of heart transplant. Serum BNP levels show a statistically significant difference in the group with rejection and thus can be an additional method in the diagnosis of cardiac rejection.

Natriuretic peptide, B-type; graft rejection; heart transplantation; biopsy; children


FUNDAMENTO: A rejeição constitui-se em uma das principais causas de mortalidade após o transplante cardíaco pediátrico. O peptídeo natriurético tipo B (BNP) tem sido estudado como método no diagnóstico de rejeição aguda, especialmente em pacientes adultos submetidos a transplante cardíaco. OBJETIVO:Correlacionar o nível sérico de BNP à rejeição aguda diagnosticada pela biópsia endomiocárdica em pacientes do grupo de transplante cardíaco pediátrico. MÉTODOS:Foram coletadas 50 amostras de BNP de 33 crianças em pós-operatório de transplante cardíaco e analisados dados de idade, sexo, cor, grupo sangüíneo, painel imunológico, tempo de evolução após o transplante, classe funcional, imunossupressão utilizada e número de rejeições. RESULTADOS:Foram 33 crianças com idade mediana de 10,13 anos, predomínio do sexo feminino (54%) e da cor branca (78%). No momento da dosagem de BNP o tempo médio de transplante foi 4,25 anos. A biópsia endomiocárdica diagnosticou nove rejeições em oito pacientes (27%), sendo três com grau 3 A, cinco com grau 2 e um com rejeição humoral. No momento da biópsia, a maioria dos pacientes encontrava-se assintomática. O nível sérico de BNP foi em média 77,18 pg/ml, sendo 144,22 pg/ml no grupo com rejeição e 62,46 pg/ml no grupo sem rejeição, com p = 0,02. CONCLUSÃO: Crianças assintomáticas podem apresentar rejeição aguda no pós-operatório de transplante cardíaco. O nível sérico de BNP apresentou diferença estatisticamente significante no grupo com rejeição, podendo ser método adicional no diagnóstico de rejeição cardíaca.

Transplante de coração; rejeição do enxerto; peptídeo natriurético tipo B; biópsia; crianças


FUNDAMENTO: El rechazo constituye una de las principales causas de mortalidad tras el transplante cardiaco pediátrico. El péptido natriurético tipo B (BNP) ha sido estudiado como método en el diagnóstico de rechazo agudo, sobre todo en pacientes adultos sometidos a transplante cardiaco. OBJETIVO:Correlacionar el nivel sérico de BNP al rechazo agudo diagnosticado por biopsia endomiocárdica en pacientes del grupo de transplante cardiaco pediátrico. MÉTODOS:Se recolectaron 50 muestras de BNP de 33 niños en postoperatorio de transplante cardiaco, y se analizaron datos como edad, sexo, color, grupo sanguíneo, cuadro inmunológico, tiempo de evolución tras el transplante, clase funcional, inmunosupresión utilizada y número de rechazos. RESULTADOS:Se seleccionaron a 33 niños con edad promedio de 10,13 años, predominio del sexo femenino (54%) y de color blanca (78%). Al momento de la dosificación de BNP, el tiempo promedio de transplante fue de 4,25 años. La biopsia endomiocárdica diagnosticó nueve rechazos en ocho pacientes (27%), de ellos tres presentaron grado 3A, cinco grado 2 y uno rechazo humoral. Ya al momento de la biopsia, la mayoría de los pacientes se encontraba asintomática. El nivel sérico de BNP tuvo como promedio, 77,18 pg/ml; 144,22 pg/ml en el grupo con rechazo y 62,46 pg/ml en el grupo sin rechazo, con p = 0,02. CONCLUSIÓN: Niños asintomáticos pueden presentar rechazo agudo en el postoperatorio de transplante cardiaco. El nivel sérico de BNP presentó diferencia estadísticamente significante en el grupo con rechazo, lo que lo convierte en posible método adicional en el diagnóstico de rechazo cardiaco.

Transplante de corazón; rechazo del injerto; péptido natriurético tipo B; biopsia; niños


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Instituto do Coração (InCor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brazil

Mailing address

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: Rejection is one of the major causes of mortality following pediatric heart transplant. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been studied as a method for the diagnosis of acute rejection, especially in adult patients undergoing heart transplant.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate serum BNP levels with acute rejection as diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy in patients of the pediatric heart transplant group.

METHODS: A total of 50 BNP samples were collected from 33 children in the postoperative period of heart transplant, and data on age, gender, skin color, blood group, immune panel, follow-up time after transplant, functional class, immunosuppressive regimen used and number of rejections were analyzed.

RESULTS: Thirty three children with median age of 10.13 years were analyzed; of these, 54% were females and 78% were Caucasians. BNP levels were determined at a mean time from transplant of 4.25 years. Nine episodes of rejection were diagnosed in eight patients (27%) by means of endomyocardial biopsy; of these, three were grade 3A, five were grade 2, and one had humoral rejection. At the moment of biopsy, most patients were asymptomatic. The mean serum BNP level was 77.18 pg/ml, with 144.22 pg/ml in the group with rejection and 62.46 pg/ml in the group without rejection, with p = 0.02.

CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic children can present acute rejection in the postoperative period of heart transplant. Serum BNP levels show a statistically significant difference in the group with rejection and thus can be an additional method in the diagnosis of cardiac rejection.

Key words:Natriuretic peptide, B-type; graft rejection; heart transplantation; biopsy; children.

Introduction

Despite recent advances described in the treatment of congestive heart failure in children, heart transplant remains the treatment of choice in a large number of children with complex congenital heart diseases and cardiomyopathies refractory to conventional therapy1,2.

The tenth official pediatric heart transplantation report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (2007)3 reports that rejection remains a major cause of mortality after pediatric heart transplant despite the new immunosuppressive agents and the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Early diagnosis is essential and noninvasive methods4-6 have been investigated in children because, despite being considered the method of choice, endomyocardial biopsy has limitations concerning technical difficulties, costs and complications when performed in children7-9.

Serum levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), a neurohormone produced by the myocardium in response to ventricular distension or increased wall stress10-12, have been used in heart transplant in adult patients as a diagnostic method of acute rejection13 and as a predictor of coronary heart disease14-16. Few reports are available in the pediatric population, with small number of patients and controversial outcomes, and this encouraged the conduction of the present study17,18.

This study consists of the assessment of serum BNP levels in comparison with pathological findings of endomyocardial biopsy, aiming at the diagnosis of acute rejection in children undergoing orthotopic heart transplant.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of 33 pediatric patients followed-up after heart transplant in Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, between June 2005 and October 2006; a total of 50 biopsies were performed.

The inclusion criteria for participation in the study were: patients with a longer than six-month follow-up after heart transplant, whose guardians agreed on the performance of cardiac catheterization and of the study protocol and gave their informed consent.

Patients not undergoing cardiac catheterization during the study period and cases with flaws in specimen collection or storage were excluded.

The clinical parameters assessed were: mood change (irritability, apathy, agitation, sleepiness) or presence of anorexia, fever, arrhythmia or signs of congestive heart failure.

Outcome data such as follow-up time after transplant, total number of rejection episodes, age at transplant, immunossupressive regimen used, need for vasoactive agents and/or anticongestive medication, as well as the presence of coronary heart disease, renal failure or diabetes mellitus were collected.

BNP sample collection

Blood sample for BNP determination was collected at the moment of endomyocardial biopsy of children undergoing heart transplant. The method used for BNP determination was the TriageTM test (Biosite Diagnostics), an immunofluorescence test for the quantitative BNP determination in blood or plasma preserved with EDTA as the anticoagulant. The sample is placed in the device, and then plasma is separated from blood by a filter. A predetermined amount of plasma is put to react with fluorescent antibodies. After an incubation period, the sample is sent to analysis for detection of the complexes formed with fluorescent antibodies.

In this study, the specimens used had been collected six months before at most, and kept frozen at minus 20ºC.

Endomyocardial biopsy

Biopsies were performed consecutively during the annual catheterization and were indicated in the cases in which acute rejection was suspected.

For data analysis, patients were divided into two groups (with rejection and without rejection) and BNP levels were evaluated in both groups. Acute cellular rejection was considered when endomyocardial biopsy findings were consistent with cellular rejection equal to or greater than grade 2 or with the presence of humoral rejection, according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)'s criteria19.

Echocardiography

Echocardiography was performed according to the American Society of Echocardiography's recommendations20 and was aimed at analyzing the following parameters: diastolic septal and wall diameter, left ventricular systolic and diastolic diameters, degree of valve regurgitation, presence of pericardial effusion, and signs of diastolic dysfunction (with transmitral flow and tissue Doppler analysis made at the mitral annulus). Ejection fraction was calculated using the Teichholz method.

Diastolic function was assessed using transmitral flow as obtained by pulsed Doppler in the four-chamber apical view, and the velocity patterns of the mitral E wave (rapid filling phase) and A wave (atrial contraction) were observed. E/A ratios equal to or greater than 1.0 were considered normal; E/A ratios lower than 1.0 were considered as ventricular relaxation abnormality; and E/A ratios greater than 1.5 were considered as restrictive pattern.

Tissue Doppler, a technique that evaluates the velocity of myocardial motion, was assessed at the lateral mitral annulus in the four-chamber apical view. Inversion of the normal E' wave (early diastolic wave) and A' wave (late diastolic wave) pattern with E'<A' or reduction of E' wave velocity was considered abnormal. Whenever any change in wave morphology or amplitude was observed, the other left ventricular and right ventricular walls were also studied.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis was conducted regarding demographic, clinical, and pre and post-transplant data of the 33 patients.

The quantitative variables were summarized by the measures of central tendency and dispersion (minimum, maximum, median, and mean values, as well as standard deviation). Qualitative data were analyzed using absolute and relative frequency tables. Graphs were plotted in order to illustrate the data.

The Mann-Whitney (non-parametric) test was used to analyze the differences between BNP concentrations in the groups with and without rejection. Also, sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the ROC curve to establish the cut-off point at the highest sensitivity value for the detection of patients with acute rejection, adopting biopsy findings as the reference standard.

Sensitivity and specificity indexes, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for the comparative analysis of echocardiogram and BNP levels (noninvasive tests) with the reference standard (endomyocardial biopsy).

The results were interpreted with the significance level (α) set at 5%21,22.

Ethical procedures for conducting the research

The study was conducted according to the follow-up criteria for patients transplanted in Instituto do Coração (InCor) do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP and did not pose any additional risk to the study participants. BNP test, as a diagnostic and experimental method, did not show any contraindications or side effects, nor did it require any special patient preparation. Measures for specimen collection and patient protection were the same adopted in the institution for immunosuppressed patients according to standards of the commission on hospital infection control.

Results

A total of 33 children with mean age of 11 years (4 to 19 years), median age of 10.13 and standard deviation of 4.55 years were studied. There was a predominance of the female gender (54.5%) and Caucasians (84.8%). Anthropometric data: weight from 12 to 78 kg, with median of 29.0 kg; height from 90 to 170 cm, with median of 136.0 cm; and median body mass index (BMI) of 16.35 and standard deviation of 3.78.

Heart transplant was indicated for dilated cardiomyopathy in 22 (67%) patients, restrictive cardiomyopathy in two (6%), congenital heart disease in eight (24%), and rheumatic heart disease in one patient (3%).

Regarding patient distribution according to blood group, 15 (45.0%) were from group O; 12 (36.0%) from group A; three (9.0%) from group B; and three (9.0%) from group AB.

The median follow-up time after transplant at the moment of BNP determination was 4.25 years (from six months to 13.6 years). The mean age at the moment of transplant was 4.90 years (from four months to 15 years).

In relation to immunosuppression, calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil were the most frequently used agents (78.7% and 66.6%, respectively). A smaller proportion of patients were on chronic calcineurin inhibitor and azathioprine and corticosteroid. The mean number of rejections was 3±1.4 rejections per patient.

By means of endomyocardial biopsy, rejection was diagnosed in nine patients (27%), of whom three had grade 3A, five had grade 2, and one had humoral rejection with no signs of cellular rejection (Graph 1).


In relation to the symptoms, most of the patients were asymptomatic at the moment of the test, and catheterization was performed during a routine procedure in 36 samples (72%). Rejection was clinically suspected (mood change, presence of arrhythmia or abnormal echocardiogram) in 10 patients (20%), and four samples (8%) were collected as controls after treatment of rejection.

The mean serum BNP level was 79.9 pg/mL, with 144.2 pg/mL in the group with rejection and 65.80 in the group without rejection, p = 0.02 (Graph 2). The analysis of the ROC curve showed 38 pg/mL as the value at a 100% sensitivity and 56% specificity for the diagnosis of cardiac rejection, with an area under the curve of 0.74 and p = 0.01 (Graph 3).



Echocardiography

Echocardiographic analysis (Table 1) found abnormalities in four out of the nine samples with rejection (44%), and in four of the 41 biopsies without rejection (10%), with a 50% positive predictive value and 88% negative predictive value. The sensitivity of the method was 44% and the specificity was 90% (p = 0.02).

The abnormalities found in patients with rejection were: moderate biventricular systolic dysfunction in a patient with humoral rejection; mild left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a patient with grade-2 rejection; and moderate mitral regurgitation and diastolic dysfunction with relaxation abnormality with E' and A' wave pattern inversion on tissue Doppler in two patients with grade-3 rejection, respectively.

Hemodynamics

In the comparison of the groups with and without rejection (Table 2), no difference was observed in relation to pulmonary systolic pressure, pulmonary capillary pressure, cardiac output, or pulmonary or systemic vascular resistance.

In relation to the presence or absence of coronary heart disease and abnormal BNP values, greater than 100 pg/mL levels were observed in three of the four patients with coronary heart disease (p = 0.01).

BNP and renal failure

Increased BNP levels not related to rejection were observed in two patients with abnormal renal function, with BNP= 208 pg/mL and 291 pg/mL, (p=0.02).

Discussion

In light of significant manifestations of rejection in asymptomatic patients that could lead to sudden death, non-invasive, high-sensitivity and specificity methods that could be repeated rapidly and in short time intervals have been the focus of a great part of the literature on heart transplant worldwide.

Studies have demonstrated BNP and NT-proBNP as reliable markers in heart failure and transplant, guiding treatment and helping in the diagnosis and prognosis23,24.

Assessment of gene expression of post-transplant patients in the chronic phase with no hemodynamic changes and free from rejection correlates increased serum BNP levels with genes present in initial inflammatory processes, cardiac remodeling, immune activation and vascular changes25, permitting an early prediction of the development of coronary heart disease or rejection .

Lan et al26 studied children in the post-operative period of heart transplant and observed that BNP levels were high in the first post-transplant month and declined gradually after this period, returning to normal values (< 100 pg/mL) in 14 weeks.

As demonstrated in the present study, acute rejection may be asymptomatic in children in the postoperative period of heart transplant, and the evaluation of serum BNP levels may be an early indicator of this rejection, especially in the most severe forms such as humoral rejection27-31.

The test is easy to perform, and can be done in the medical office with immediate result, so it can be repeated in cases in which rejection is suspected or even in routine outpatient visits. This permits cardiac catheterization to be postponed, which reduces morbidity rates among these children.

The cut-off point found in this study for the diagnosis of acute cardiac rejection using the ROC curve with 100% sensitivity was 38 pg/mL. This can indicate that lower values could be considered, prioritizing the sensitivity of the method.

Despite its low sensitivity for the diagnosis of cardiac rejection, echocardiography is easy to perform and has a high specificity, findings that are consistent with those reported by Akioka et al32. It should be used comparatively and along with all the resources currently available, including tissue-Doppler analysis. Further studies are necessary to increase the sensitivity of the method.

The assessment of hemodynamic measurements, except for reduced cardiac output, did not correlate with biopsy findings in this study, in corroboration with other studies of the literature33-35. The correlation between increased BNP levels and the presence of coronary heart disease was significant in this sample, thus showing the importance of the method in the screening of graft vascular disease as well.

Study limitations

The small number of patients, and consequently the small group with rejection, made analysis of subgroups difficult.

Clinical implications

BNP proved to be an important ancillary test in the diagnosis of cardiac rejection, especially in the most severe cases, such as those with humoral rejection.

This test is easy to perform, only slightly invasive, allows immediate result, and can be repeated serially in order to postpone endomyocardial biopsy.

Its correlation with coronary heart disease also points out the importance of the method in the long-term follow-up of children in the late postoperative period of heart transplant, considering that this is an important cause of mortality after five years of transplant, and is frequently manifested as sudden death in outpatients.

Conclusion

Acute rejection can be asymptomatic in the late postoperative period of heart transplant children, and serial serum BNP level determination may help the diagnosis of this rejection.

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Sources of Funding

This study was partially funded by FAPESP.

Study Association

This article is part of the thesis of Doctoral submitted by Cristina de Sylos, from Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo.

References

  • 1. Azeka E, Barbero-Marcial M, Jatene M, Auler JO, Ramires JA. Eight years experience of pediatric heart transplantation: clinical outcome using non-invasive methods for the evaluation of acute rejection. Pediatr Transplant. 2002; 6 (3): 208-13.
  • 2. Azeka E, Ramires JA, Valler C, Bocchi E. Delisting of infants and children from the heart transplantation waiting list after carvedilol treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40 (11): 2034-8.
  • 3. Boucek MM, Aurora P, Edwards LB, Taylor DO, Trulock EP, Christie J, et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: tenth official pediatric heart transplantation report - 2007. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007; 26 (8): 796-807.
  • 4. Azeka E, Barbero Marcial M, Soares J, Camargo PR, Jatene M, Auler JO, et al. The importance of noninvasive methods on the evaluation of acute rejection in pediatric transplantation: Gallium 67 scintigraphy as an option. In: 2nd World Congress Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Honolulu, 1998. Proceedings. Honolulu; 1998. p. 133-6.
  • 5. Azeka E. Transplante cardíaco em crianças - análise clínica evolutiva. [Tese]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 1998.
  • 6. Zales VR, Crawford S, Backer CL, Pahl E, Webb CL, Lynch P, et al. Role of endomyocardial biopsy in rejection surveillance after heart transplantation in neonates and children. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 23 (3): 766-71.
  • 7. Wagner K, Oliver MC, Boyle GJ, Miller SA, Law YM, Pigula F, et al. Endomyocardial biopsy in pediatric heart transplant recipients; a useful exercise? (Analysis of 1169 biopsies). Pediatr Transplant. 2000; 4 (3): 186-92.
  • 8. Siaplaouras J, Thul J, Kramer U, Bauer J, Schranz D. Cardiac troponin I: a marker of acute heart rejection in infant and child heart recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2003; 7 (1): 43-5.
  • 9. Arnau-Vives MA, Almenar L, Hervas I, Osa A, Martinez-Dolz L, Rueda J, et al. Preditive value of brain natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of heart transplant rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004; 23 (7): 850-6.
  • 10. Park MH, Uber PA, Scott RL, Mehra MR. B-type natriuretic peptide in heart transplantation: an important marker of allograft performance. Heart Fail Rev. 2003, 8 (4): 359-63.
  • 11. Abramson LP, Pahl E, Huang L, Stellmach V, Rodgers S, Mavroudis C, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor as a surveillance marker for cellular rejection in pediatric cardiac transplantation. Transplantation. 2002; 73 (1): 153-6.
  • 12. Troughton RW, Prior DL, Pereira JJ, Martin M, Fogarty A, Morehead A, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels in systolic heart failure: importance of left ventricular diastolic function and right ventricular systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43 (3): 416-22.
  • 13. Bibbins-Domingo K, Ansari M, Schiller NB, Massie B, Whooley MA. B-natriuretic peptide and ischemia in patients with stable coronary disease. Circulation. 2003; 108 (24): 2987-92.
  • 14. Mayer SA, De Lemos JA, Murphy SA, Brooks S, Robert BJ, Grayburn PA. Comparison of B-natriuretic peptide levels in patients with heart failure versus without mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 15 (8): 1002-6.
  • 15. Kruger S, Graf J, Kumz D, Stickel T, Hanrath P, Jansens U. Brain natriuretic peptide levels predict functional capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 21 (4): 718-22.
  • 16. Tang WH, Girod JP, Lee MJ, Starling RC, Ypung JB, Van Lente F, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels in ambulatory patients with established chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure. Circulation. 2003; 208 (24): 2964-6.
  • 17. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D, Benjamin E, Leip EP, Omland T, et al. Plasma natriuretic peptide levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350 (7): 655-63.
  • 18. Groenning B, Raymond I, Hildebrandt PR, Nilsson JC, Baumann M, Pedersen F. Diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of left ventricular systolic heart failure by Plasma N terminal pro-Brain natriuretic peptide concentration in a large sample of general population. Heart. 2004; 90 (3): 297-303.
  • 19. Billingham ME, Cary NR, Hammond ME, Kemnitz J, Marboe C, McCallister HA, et al. A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: Heart Rejection Study Group. The International Society for Heart Transplantation. J Heart Transplant. 1990; 9: 587-93.
  • 20. Schiller NB, Shaw PK, Crawford M, De Maria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaun H. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardography Committee on Standars. Subcommittee on quantitation of two dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989; 2: 358-67.
  • 21. Bickel PJ, Doksum KA. Mathematical statistics: basic ideas and select topics. San Francisco: Holden Day; 1997. p. 153-91.
  • 22. Costa Neto PLO. Estatística. São Paulo: Ed Edgard Blucher; 1977. p. 78.
  • 23. Shou M, Gustafsson F, Nielsem PH, Madsen LH, Kjaer A, Hildebrandt R. Unexplained week-to-week variation in BNP and NT-proBNP is low in chronic heart failure during steady state. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007; 9: 68-74.
  • 24. Shaw S, Williams SG. Is brain natriuretic peptide clinically useful after cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 12: 1396-401.
  • 25. Mehra MR, Uber WE, Walther D, Vesely M, Wohlgemuth JG, Prentice J, et al. Gene expression profiles and B-type natriuretic peptide elevation in heart transplantation: more than a hemodynamic marker. Circulation. 2006; 4: 21-6.
  • 26. Lan YT, Chang RK, Alejos JC, Burch C, Wetzel GT. B-type natriuretic peptide in children after cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004; 23 (5): 558-63.
  • 27. Hervas I, Almenar L, Perez-Pastor JL, Chirivella M, Osa A, Martinez-Doltz P, et al. Radioimmunometric assay of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in heart transplantation: correlation between BNP determination and biopsy grading of rejection. Nucl Med Commun. 2003; 24 (8): 925-31.
  • 28. Ationu A, Sorensen K, Whitehead B, Singer D, Burch M, Carter ND. Ventricular expression of brain natriuretic peptide gene following orthotopic cardiac transplantation in children - a three year follow up. Cardiovasc Res. 1993; 27 (12): 2135-9.
  • 29. Ilene Claudius MD, Yueh-Tze Lan MD, Chang RK, Wetzel GT, Alejos J. Usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide as a noninvasive screening tool for cardiac allograft pathology in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 92 (11): 1368-70.
  • 30. O'Neill JO, Mcrae AT, Troughton RW, Kenneth NG, Taylor DO, Yamani MH, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide levels do not correlate with acute cellular rejection in de novo orthotopic heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24 (4): 416-20.
  • 31. Hammerer-Lercher A, Mair J, Antretter H, Ruttmann E, Poeltzl G, Laufer G, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide as a marker of allograft rejection after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24 (9): 1444-7.
  • 32. Akioka K, Takeuchi K, Yanagi S, Hirota K, Sakamoto K, Yoshimura T, et al. Prognostic value of Doppler transmitral flow patterns and cardiac natriuretic peptides in patients with chronic congestive heart failure admitted for episodes of acute descompensation. Heart Vessels. 2000; 15 (2): 53-60.
  • 33. Mehra MR, Uber WE, Park MH, Scott RL. Anything but a biopsy: monitoring for cardiac allograft rejection. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2002; 17: 131-6.
  • 34. Wagner K, Oliver MC, Boyle GJ, Miller SA, Law YM, Pigula F, et al. Endomyocardial biopsy in pediatric heart transplantation: a useful exercise (analysis of 1169 biopsies). Pediatric Transplant. 2000; 4: 186-92.
  • 35. Stehlik J, Starling RC, Movsesian MA, Fang JC, Brown RN, Hess MI, et al. Utility of long term surveillance endomyocardial biopsy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25: 1402-9.
  • B-type natriuretic peptide assessment in the diagnosis of rejection after pediatric heart transplant

    Cristina de Sylos; Estela Azeka; Luis Kajita; Luis Benvenutti; Célia Cassaro Strunz; Klébia Castello Branco; Arlindo Almeida Riso; Carla Tanamati; Marcelo Jatene; Miguel Barbero-Marcial
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      17 Apr 2009
    • Date of issue
      Mar 2009

    History

    • Accepted
      31 July 2008
    • Reviewed
      04 July 2008
    • Received
      11 Apr 2008
    Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: revista@cardiol.br