Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy: two-year follow-up period

Abstracts

BACKGROUND: The cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective option for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic criteria have been studied in an attempt to find the patients that will benefit from the CRT, considering that the echocardiogram is the method that is used both in the selection and in the assessment of such therapy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to analyze the use of echocardiogram to assess the CRT, in a ten-day follow-up period and after two years of evolution. METHODS: The assessment considered 20 patients subjected to CRT, for a period of two years, 80% of which were male. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF) was filled out. Patients underwent a six-minute walking test. Then, the two-dimensional echo-Doppler-cardiogram was performed. The initial assessment was repeated ten days after and two year after the implantation of the biventricular pacemaker. RESULTS: In two years, 5 patients (25%) died; 4 had cardiomyopathy caused by the Chagas's disease. There was no statistically significant change in the ejection fraction between the pre-operation period and the following ten days, but there was a significant change between the pre-operation period and two years after that, and the ten-day period and two years after that. In the ten-day follow-up period, there was the worsening of the intraventricular dyssynchrony, as evaluated by the tissue Doppler method, and the "living with heart failure" score was higher in the group of deaths. CONCLUSION: Out of the echocardiographic parameters assessed, only the intraventricular dyssynchrony assessment through the tissue Doppler method, after the procedure, was capable of predict the CRT efficiency with respect to the death rate.

Echocardiography; heart failure; stroke volume


FUNDAMENTO: A terapia de ressincronização cardíaca (TRC) é uma opção efetiva para os pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC) avançada. Critérios clínicos, eletrocardiográficos e ecocardiográficos têm sido estudados na tentativa de selecionar os pacientes que serão beneficiados com a TRC, sendo o ecocardiograma um método utilizado tanto na seleção quanto na avaliação desta terapêutica. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar a utilização do ecocardiograma na avaliação da TRC, no seguimento de dez dias e após dois anos de evolução. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 20 pacientes submetidos à TRC, por um período de dois anos, sendo 80% do sexo masculino. Foi aplicado o Questionário de Qualidade de Vida de Minnesota, o teste de caminhada de seis minutos e realizado o ecodopplercardiograma bidimensional. Dez dias após o implante do marca-passo biventricular, bem como dois anos depois, foi repetida a avaliação inicial. RESULTADOS: Em dois anos, 5 pacientes (25%) foram a óbito; 4 apresentavam cardiomiopatia de etiologia chagásica. Não houve alteração estatisticamente significante da fração de ejeção entre o período pré-operatório e os dez dias seguintes, mas sim uma alteração significante nos períodos de pré-operatório e dois anos e de dez dias e dois anos. No seguimento de dez dias, houve piora da dissincronia intraventricular avaliada pelo Doppler tecidual, assim como a pontuação no escore de qualidade de vida foi maior no grupo óbito. CONCLUSÃO: Dos parâmetros ecocardiográficos avaliados, somente a avaliação da dissincronia intraventricular pelo Doppler tecidual após o procedimento foi capaz de predizer a eficácia da TRC em relação à mortalidade.

Ecocardiografia; insuficiência cardíaca; volume sistólico


FUNDAMENTO: La terapia de resincronización cardiaca (TRC) es una opción efectiva para los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) avanzada. Se vienen estudiando criterios clínicos, electrocardiográficos y ecocardiográficos en el intento de seleccionar a los pacientes que serán beneficiados con la TRC, siendo el ecocardiograma un método utilizado tanto en la selección como en la evaluación de este tratamiento. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la utilización del ecocardiograma en la evaluación de la TRC, en el seguimiento de diez días y luego de dos años de evolución. MÉTODOS: Fueron evaluados 20 pacientes sometidos a la TRC, por un período de dos años, siendo el 80% de sexo masculino. Se aplicó el Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida de Minnesota, el test de caminata de 6 minutos y se realizó el ecodopplercardiograma bidimensional. Diez días tras el implante del marcapasos biventricular, así como dos años después, se repitió la evaluación inicial. RESULTADOS: En dos años, 5 pacientes (25%) obitaron; 4 presentaban miocardiopatía de etiología chagásica. No hubo alteración estadísticamente significativa de la fracción de eyección entre el período preoperatorio y los diez días siguientes, pero sí una alteración significativa en los períodos de preoperatorio, dos años y diez días y dos años. En el seguimiento de diez días, hubo un empeoramiento de la disincronía intraventricular evaluada por doppler tisular, así como la puntuación en el escore de calidad de vida fue mayor en el grupo óbito. CONCLUSIÓN: De los parámetros ecocardiográficos evaluados, solamente la evaluación de la disincronía intraventricular por doppler tisular tras el procedimiento fue capaz de predecir la eficacia de la TRC en relación a la mortalidad.

Ecocardiografía; insuficiencia cardiaca; volumen sistólico


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

IUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

IIReal e Benemérita Associação Portuguesa de Beneficência - São Paulo, SP - Brazil

Mailing address

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective option for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic criteria have been studied in an attempt to find the patients that will benefit from the CRT, considering that the echocardiogram is the method that is used both in the selection and in the assessment of such therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to analyze the use of echocardiogram to assess the CRT, in a ten-day follow-up period and after two years of evolution.

METHOD: The assessment considered 20 patients subjected to CRT, for a period of two years, 80% of which were male. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF) was filled out. Patients underwent a six-minute walking test. Then, the two-dimensional echo-Doppler-cardiogram was performed. The initial assessment was repeated ten days after and two year after the implantation of the biventricular pacemaker.

RESULTS: In two years, 5 patients (25%) died; 4 had cardiomyopathy caused by the Chagas's disease. There was no statistically significant change in the ejection fraction between the pre-operation period and the following ten days, but there was a significant change between the pre-operation period and two years after that, and the ten-day period and two years after that. In the ten-day follow-up period, there was the worsening of the intraventricular dyssynchrony, as evaluated by the tissue Doppler method, and the "living with heart failure" score was higher in the group of deaths.

CONCLUSION: Out of the echocardiographic parameters assessed, only the intraventricular dyssynchrony assessment through the tissue Doppler method, after the procedure, was capable of predict the CRT efficiency with respect to the death rate.

Key-Words: echocardiography; heart failure / therapy; stroke volume.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a medical condition with a high morbidity-mortality rate that affects approximately 23 million people in the world1. According to DATASUS2, in Brazil, in the period between January and July 2008, 147,348 hospital admissions caused by HF.

Intraventricular conduction disturbances with extension of the QRS complex are present in 25-50% of HF patients3-6, in which the most frequent case is the left bundle branch block (LBBB)6,7.

The conduction of the electrical stimulus is associated with the functional cardiac efficiency. In patients in whom there is a change in the regular conduction of the stimulus, there may be some interference in the ventricular and/or atrial contractile coordination - called cardiac dyssynchrony. That may cause a change in the myocardial function8,9.

Cazeau et al10, in 1994, described the stimulation of the left ventricle through the coronary sinus, with a four-chamber pacemaker. In 2001, the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was approved for clinical use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). After that, more than 270,000 patients have already undergone the procedure11. In Brazil, according to Pachón et al12, in the period from 1994 to 2006, 2,180 resynchronizers were implanted. Nowadays, the CRT, through heart stimulation with a biventricular pacemaker, has been used as an auxiliary therapy in patients that are refractory to optimized medication therapy13,14.

Bakker et al15, in an analysis of 5 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, with large QRS and who were refractory to medication, were the first authors to demonstrate the correlation between biventricular stimulation and the improvement in heart performance. After that, many studies were published to assess the effects of biventricular stimulation16-18.

Despite the proven benefits of CRT16-18, approximately 20-30% of patients do not respond to this therapy (they are called "non-responders"19,20). That makes it necessary to adopt additional selection criteria to identify patients that will benefit from cardiac resynchronization21,22.

According to the Brazilian Guidelines for Implantable Electronic Cardiac Devices (2007)23, recommendation I and the evidence level A for CRT is: Patients in functional class III or IV (NYHA), with optimized medication therapy, ejection fraction < 35%, sinus rhythm and duration of the QRS complex > 150 ms or QRS between 120 and 150 ms, with proof of dyssynchrony by the imaging method.

The use of echocardiography as a supplemental method for indication of the CRT was described for the first time in 2005, in the CARE-HF (Cardiac Resynchronization - Heart Failure)24 study, which compared the effect of CRT on the risk of complications and death. Countless echocardiographic techniques have been proposed to quantify the ventricular dyssynchrony, with the purpose of optimizing the selection of patients for the CRT25.

Pitzalis et al26 used the monodimensional mode (M mode) to assess the intraventricular dyssynchrony, considering values above 130 ms as abnormal. The pulsed Doppler is an echocardiographic method used to assess the intraventricular dyssynchrony24, by the electromechanical delay difference between the right and left ventricles, indicating dyssynchrony when the values above 40 ms19,25.

The echocardiogram is also used in the evaluation of the mitral regurgitation. Breithardt et al27 studied its acute effects on CRT, assessing 24 patients subjected to resynchronization, who did not show significant reduction in the level of mitral insufficiency, directly associated with the dP/dt increase.

The tissue Doppler allows identifying and measuring the myocardial motion speed, by positioning the cursor in the segment that you wish to evaluate28. Bax et al19, in a study with 85 patients for a 6-month follow-up period after the CRT, demonstrated, among four basal segments, sensitiveness and specificity of 80% as predictor of clinical improvement and 92% as predictor of reverse modeling, in the presence of interval greater than 65 ms and evaluated by the tissue Doppler.

Objective

The objective of this work is to analyze the use of the echocardiogram in the evaluation of the cardiac resynchronization therapy, in patients with refractory HF, in a short follow-up period (ten days) and after two years of evolution.

Case selection and method

The study was based on 20 patients, to whom a biventricular pacemaker implant had been prescribed, through the coronary sinus, for cardiac resynchronization therapy, aged 59.70 ± 12.59 years on average, 16 of which (80%) were male, monitored for a two-year period. The cardiomyopathy had been caused by ischemia in 10 patients (50%), by Chagas's disease in 6 patients (30%) and by other unknown factors in 4 patients (20%). Fifteen patients (75%) were in functional class III and 5 (25%) in functional class IV, when the resynchronization therapy was prescribed to them.

Study dynamics

When the CRT was prescribed, the patients' medical history was prepared. Then, they underwent clinical tests and were classified according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA), for a functional evaluation. After the initial clinical evaluation, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) was filled out. The distance traveled was determined (in meters, through a six-minute walking test) and the two-dimensional echo-Doppler-cardiogram was performed, with the use of a 3.5 Hz transducer in the Nemio equipment (Toshiba). Ten days after the biventricular pacemaker was implanted, the entire initial evaluation was repeated, and the same process was repeated after two years.

Echocardiographic evaluation

Evaluation of the left ventricular function

The ejection fraction of the left ventricle was evaluated through the two-dimensional method (Simpson's method). In addition, the myocardial performance index (or Tei index) was calculated, for evaluating the systole and diastole functions of the left ventricle, calculated by the sum of isovolumetric contraction and relaxation times divided by the ejection time, considering values below 0.40 as normal.

Evaluation of the reverse remodeling

The reverse remodeling is characterized by a reduction of more than 15% of the final systolic volume, evaluated by the echocardiogram, between the pre-operation and post-operation periods.

Evaluation of the mitral regurgitation

The mitral regurgitation evaluation was conducted with the use of the color flow mapping in the four-chamber apical and parasternal cross-section slices. The mitral regurgitation was quantified by the ratio of the regurgitating jet area to the left atrium area, considering that the regurgitation is minor when the percentage area is smaller than 20% and important when it is larger than 40%.

Evaluation of the interventricular dyssynchrony

The pulsed Doppler method was used to analyze the interventricular dyssynchrony, through the electromechanical delay difference between left and right ventricles, by measuring the time interval between the R wave of the electrocardiogram and the beginning of the speed curve of the aortic flow and pulmonary flow. Interval above 40 ms indicates interventricular dyssynchrony.

Evaluation of the intraventricular dyssynchrony

The M-mode and the tissue-Doppler methods were used to assess the intraventricular dyssynchrony. In the short-axis parasternal slice, at the level of the papillary muscles, the M-mode evaluation was performed, by measuring the time interval between the maximum contraction of the septum and the posterior wall of the left ventricle (S/PW), considering as dyssynchrony values above 130 ms. In the tissue-Doppler evaluation, the myocardial speeds are obtained in the apical plane of the basal segments of septal, lateral, anterior and inferior walls, and the time interval between the beginning of the QRS complex and the peak of the myocardial systolic wave of the tissue-Doppler is measured in the different segments. There is significant dyssynchrony when the time interval difference is higher than 65 ms between any segments assessed. The values considered were obtained by the average of four consecutive heart beats.

Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 11.5, was used for analyzing the data. To run the tests, bilateral hypotheses and a significance level α = 5% were taken into account. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the frequency, average and standard deviation of the variables of interest. The t-test for independent samples was used for the comparison of the age-variable averages. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables, when they were quantitative variables.

The Chi-square test was used to check if the proportions of the categories of clinical and echocardiographic variables, when they were qualitative variables, were homogenous in groups of interest. For comparing the functional class, "living with heart failure" score and traveled distance, QRS time length variables and echocardiographic variables (ejection fraction, mitral insufficiency, interventricular dyssynchrony, posterior wall/septum distance, myocardial performance index, final diastolic and systolic volume, diastolic diameter of the left ventricle and tissue-Doppler throughout time [before operation, 10 days and two years]), the NON-PARAMETRIC ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was used.

Results

In this work, 20 patients in whom a biventricular pacemaker was implanted were monitored for two years. There were neither complications with respect to the surgical procedure nor deaths in the 10-day follow-up period after operation.

An analysis was conducted to assess the behavior of clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables, comparing them in the period before and after the operation (10 days after and two days after). When the pacemaker was implanted, 15 patients were in functional class III; 5 in functional class IV; 13 patients (65%) showed improvement in the functional class in the first post-operation evaluation; 6 (30%) kept the same functional class; and there was worsening of the functional class in one patient (5%). In the two-year follow-up period, 10 patients showed no change in the functional class, compared to the previous evaluation, and there was improvement in three patients and worsening in two of them.

In the assessment of variables throughout time, it was possible to find statistically significant differences for the following variables: functional class, living with heart failure score, QRX complex time length, ejection fraction, inter and intraventricular dyssynchrony (time between contraction of septum and the posterior wall - M mode and tissue-Doppler) and diastolic diameter of left ventricle. Table 1 shows the mean and the standard deviation for each one of the variables in the pre-operation period, in the 10 days after the surgery and two years after the CRT.

The average time length of the QRS complex in the pre-operation period was 154.5 ± 18.48 ms; 129.0 ± 22.91 ms in the 10-day evaluation; and 134.0 ± 24.14 ms in the two-year evaluation, with p < 0,001.

When the QRS complex time length and functional class were compared, it was possible to notice that patients with QRS time length, showed a higher functional class, in the pre-operation evaluation (p = 0.006), but there was not statistically significant difference in the post-operation periods (Table 2).

For the functional class, QRX complex time length and tissue-Doppler variables, it was possible to notice statistically significant differences between the pre-operation period and the evaluation 10 days after the procedure, as well as between the pre-operation period and two years after the post-implantation. However, there was no difference between the 10-day and two-year periods. For these variables, it was possible to see a reduction in the measures after the surgical intervention, which remained stable after two years. In Chart 1, it is possible to analyze the variation noticed throughout time by the evaluation of the tissue-Doppler.


For the ejection fraction, we noticed no statistically significant difference between the pre-operation period and the ten days after the operation, but there were differences between the pre-operation period and the next two years and between the ten days and the two subsequent years.

It was possible to find statistically significant differences between all periods in the assessment of the following variables: Interventricular dyssynchrony, posterior wall/septum distance and living with heart failure score. Therefore, there was a significant reduction when we compare the pre-operation period and the 10 days after that and the pre-operation period and the two subsequent years in the three variables analyzed. However, there was a statistically significant increase in the values found between the 10-day period and two-year period of these variables.

In the assessment of the LVDD, there was significant reduction between the pre-operation period and the 10-day period and significant increase between the 10-day period and the two-year period, so there is no statistically significant difference between initial and final measurements.

In our case selection, 5 patients (25%) died. In Table 3, it is possible to see that the proportion of men in the death group to men in the non-death group is homogeneous (86.7% and 60%, respectively), with predominance of men in both groups, and with no significant difference between the proportion of men to women in the two groups (p = 0.249).

For the cause (etiology) variable, in the non-death group, the number of patients with dilated and ischemic etiology is larger than in the death-group. In Chagas-disease etiology, the situation is the opposite: 80% of patients are in the death group, and there is a statistically significant difference in the proportions of the etiology types according to death (p = 0.018).

There was no statistically significant difference between the death and non-death groups for the mitral insufficiency variable and QRS complex time length variable, both in the pre-operation period and after 10 days.

Table 4 shows the comparisons of the following variables: functional class, living with heart failure score, traveled distance, interventricular dyssynchrony, posterior wall/septum distance, myocardial performance index, final systolic and diastolic volume and tissue-Doppler in the pre-operation period and 10 days after surgery.

There was no statistically significant difference between the death and non-death group, in the assessment of pre-operation variables. However, in the 10-day assessment, there was a statistically significant difference in the living with heart failure score, and the living with heart failure score of death group patients is higher than that of non-death group patients. The same thing happened for the tissue-Doppler variable, in which the values of the death group suggested greater intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Discussion

HF is a serious public health problem, with high morbidity-mortality rate and costs above 33 billion dollars a year1.

In around 25-50% of HF patients, there is the presence of intraventricular conduction disturbance, in which the left bundle branch block occurs more frequently. Baldasseroni et al7, assessed, in 2002, the link between the LBBB and the mortality rate and demonstrated that LBBB is an unfavorable prognostic marker and regardless of age, HF level and use of therapy.

Nowadays, the CRT has been used as an auxiliary therapy in patients that are refractory to optimized medication therapy16,18.

In our case selection, we assessed 20 patients, 15 of which were in functional class III and 5 in functional class IV, who had undergone the CRT through the coronary sinus, and without complications inherent in the procedure. All patients show LBBB in the electrocardiogram, with QRS complex time length above 120 ms.

Despite the proven benefits of CRT16-18, approximately 20-30% of patients do not respond to this therapy19,20. That makes it necessary to implement additional criteria to identify patients that will be entitled to this benefit21,22.

In this case selection, in the follow-up period of 10 days after implantation of the biventricular pacemaker, there was an improvement in the functional class in 13 patients (65%), worsening in one of them (5%) and in 6 patients (30%) the functional class remained unchanged. After two years of evolution, 8 patients were in functional class II and 7 in functional class III. The mortality in this period was of 25% (5 patients), with no correlation between the death and the worsening of the functional class.

In the assessment of the causes of the cardiomyopathy, Reuter et al29 associated the dilated cardiomyopathy with the better clinical response of CRT. Martinelli Filho et al30, in a study including patients whose heart failure resulted from Chagas's disease, there was a significant reduction in the functional class in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, besides the fact that this etiology had been a predictor, regardless of clinical improvement.

Among the patients of this study, the ones whose cardiomyopathy had been caused by Chagas's disease were linked to the higher death rate, with statistically significant when compared to patients with ischemic and dilated etiology.

Shamim et al8 assessed, in a 36-month follow-up period, the association between the QRS duration and the mortality, where patients with QRS below 120 ms showed a mortality of 20%; QRS between 120 and 160 ms, 36%; and above 160 ms, the mortality was of 58%31.

In our case selection, comparing the functional class and the QRS time length, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups in the pre-CRT period, where the group with QRS > 160 ms showed a worse functional class31. In the 10-day follow-up period, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. In the two-year assessment, there was only one patient alive with QRS time length above 160 ms.

Many echocardiographic techniques have been used to quantify the interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchronies, with the purpose of optimizing the selection of patients for CRT.

The assessment of the interventricular dyssynchrony by using the M-mode of the echocardiogram (S/PW) was proposed by Pitzalis et al26 - in a group of 20 patients. All responders had an S/PW distance of more than 130 ms.

In this test, we had a statistically significant reduction in the values of the S/PW value, when the three analysis periods were compared. However, there was no statistical difference in the death group compared to the non-death group in the pre-operation evaluation and in the 10-day follow-up period. In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, the S/PW variable analysis may be impaired by segmental contraction changes.

With the pulsed Doppler, Chung et al32 showed the link between this variable and the clinical improvement and reverse remodeling.

In our group, there was a statistically significant difference in the pre-operation period and in the two post-operation evaluation periods. However, when we compared the values of the death group and non-death group, there was no statistically significant difference.

In the mitral regurgitation evaluation, in 10 days, 11 patients showed no changes in the mitral regurgitation level. In the two-year follow-up period, 10 patients had the same level of regurgitation that they had in the pre-operation period in the first follow-up period (10 days) and subsequent worsening in the two-year assessment. In the comparison of the death-group and non-death group, the mitral insufficiency value was not statistically significant.

In a study with 85 patients, in a 6-month follow-up period after the CRT, Bax et al19 demonstrated the sensitiveness and specificity of 80% as a predictor of clinical improvement and 92% of sensitiveness and specificity as a predictor of reverse remodeling, when the dyssynchrony value assessed by the tissue-Doppler was greater than 65 ms.

In our group, we had a statistically significant difference in the variation of the tissue-Doppler of the pre-operation and post-operation periods. And, it was possible to consider that the tissue-Doppler evaluation in the first days after the procedure is a useful tool to assess the CRT's efficiency. When compared to the death and non-death groups, the tissue-Doppler revealed an increase associated with the death group.

In this study, more advanced echocardiography techniques, such as the three-dimensional echocardiogram and the bidimensional strain, were not used. The use of such techniques, in the future, may expand the application of echocardiography in the evaluation of patients for CRT.

Study limitations

- Small case selection, with absence in the control group;

- Echocardiographic evaluation without intra and interobserver reproducibility study.

Conclusion

In the assessment of the echocardiographic parameters evaluated herein, only the intraventricular dyssynchrony through the tissue Doppler method after the procedure was capable of predicting the cardiac resynchronization efficiency with respect to mortality. The echocardiographic parameters are not associated with the clinical improvement.

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Sources of Funding

There were no external funding sources for this study.

Study Association

This article is part of the thesis of master submitted by Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, from Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

References

  • 1. McAlister FA, Teo KK, Taher M. Insights into the contemporary epidemiology and outpatient management of congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 1999; 138: 87-94.
  • 2
    Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS. Sistema de Informações hospitalares do SUS. [Acesso em 2009 jan 8]. Disponível em: http://www.datasus.gov.br
  • 3. Furman S, Robinson G. Use of intracardiac pacemaker in correction of total heart block. Surg Forum. 1958; 9: 245.
  • 4. Horwich T, Foster E, De Marco T, Tseng Z, Saxon L. Effects of resynchronization therapy on cardiac function in pacemaker patients "upgraded" to biventricular devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15 (11): 1284-9.
  • 5. Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM, Wong KL, Goin JE, Mancini DM. Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation. 1997; 95 (12): 2660-7.
  • 6. Leclercq C, Hare JM. Ventricular resynchronization: current state of the art. Circulation. 2004; 109 (3): 296-9.
  • 7. Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M, Lucci D, Marchionni M, Marini M, et al. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian Network on congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 2002; 143 (3): 398-405.
  • 8. Shamim W, Francis DP, Yousufuddin M, Varney S, Pieopli MF, Anker SD, et al. Intraventricular conduction delay: a prognostic marker in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 1999; 70 (2): 171-8.
  • 9. Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinick EH, Dae MW, Cockrell J, Aboot JA, et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 67: 148-56.
  • 10. Cazeau, S, Ritter P, Bakdach S. Four chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994; 17 (11 Pt 2): 1974-9.
  • 11. Aranda JM, Woo GW, Schofield RS, Handberg EM, Hill JA, Curtis AB, et al. Management of heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy: integrating advanced heart failure treatment with optimal device function. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46 (12): 2193-8.
  • 12. Pachón MJC, Mosquéra JAP, Pachón MJC, Vargas RNA, Campos Neto CM, Costa ARB. Aspectos epidemiológicos da estimulação cardíaca no Brasil - 12ş ano do RBM - Registro brasileiro de marcapassos, desfibriladores e ressincronizadores cardíacos. Relampa. 2008; 21 (1): 5-12.
  • 13. Díaz-Infante E, Hernández-Madrid A, Brugada-Terradellas J, Férnandez-Lozano I, García-Bolao I, Del Ojo JL, et al. Consenso sobre la terapia de resincronización cardíaca. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005; 5 (Supl): 3B-11B.
  • 14. Brito Jr HL, Bianchi FN, Nascimento LEP, Toledo RM, Barral MM. Estimulação cardíaca artificial como tratamento dos pacientes com miocardiopatia dilatada e insuficiência cardíaca. Novos conceitos, novas técnicas e necessidades de atualização. Reblampa. 2000; 13 (4): 185-93.
  • 15. Bakker PF, Meijburg H, Dejonge N, Mechelen RV, Wittkampf F, Mower M, et al. Beneficial effects of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure. [abstract] Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994; 17: 820.
  • 16. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, et al. for the Multicenter InSync randomized clinical evaluation (MIRACLE) study group. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346 (24): 1845-53.
  • 17. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, et al. for the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350 (21): 2140-50.
  • 18. Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, Walker S, Varma C, Linde C, et al. for the Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathies (MUSTIC) Study Investigators. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344 (12): 873-80.
  • 19. Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, Molhoek SG, Boersma E, Steendijk P, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1834-40.
  • 20. Saxon LA, Ellenbogen KA. Resynchronization therapy for the treatment of heart failure. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1044-8.
  • 21. Galvão Filho SS, Vasconcelos JTM, Barcelos CB, Rabelo AC. Seleção de pacientes e modos de estimulação cardíaca no tratamento da disfunção ventricular. Rev Soc Cardiol Estado de São Paulo. 2004; 1: 43-54.
  • 22. Díaz-Infante E, Mont L, Leal J, García-Bolao I, Fernández-Lozano I, Hernández-Madrid A, et al. of the Spanish Cardiac Resynchronization Study (SCARS). Predictors of lack of response to resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95: 1436-40.
  • 23. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Diretrizes brasileiras de dispositivos cardíacos eletrônicos implantáveis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007; 89 (6): e210-e238.
  • 24. Cleland JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. for the Cardiac Resynchronization - Heart failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1539-49.
  • 25. Gorcsan IIII J, Abraham T, Agler DA, Bax JJ, Derumeaux G, Grimm RA, et al. Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting - a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony writing group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21 (3): 191-213.
  • 26. Pitzalis MV, Iacoviello M, Romito R, Massari F, Rizzon B, Luzzi G, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1615-22.
  • 27. Breithdardt OA, Sinha AM, Schwammenthal E, Bidaoui N, Markus KU, Franke A, et al. Acute effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on functional mitral regurgitation in advanced systolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 765-70.
  • 28. Silva CES, Barreto ACP. Avaliação ecocardiográfica da terapia de ressincronização cardíaca. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005; 84 (6): 503-7.
  • 29. Reuter S, Garrigue S, Barold SS, Jais P, Hocini M, Haissaguerre M, et al. Comparison of characteristics in responders versus nonresponders with biventricular pacing for drug-resistant congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 346-50.
  • 30. Martinelli Filho M, Baggio Jr JM, Nishioka SAD, Pedrosa A, Torres GG, Escarião A, et al. Ressincronização cardíaca em seguimento tardio: análise de preditores de resposta clínica. Reblampa. 2006; 19 (1): 45-52.
  • 31. Achilli A, Sassara M, Ficili S, Pontillo D, Achilli P, Alessi C, et al. Long-term effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with refractory heart failure and "narrow" QRS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42 (12): 2117-24.
  • 32. Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, et al. Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008; 117: 2608-16.
  • Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy: two-year follow-up period

    Viviane Cordeiro VeigaI, II; Salomón Soriano Ordinola RojasI, II; Fernando Sérgio Oliva de SouzaII; Reinaldo Wilson VieiraI; Amilton Silva JuniorII; Marcelo Luiz PatrícioII; Elias César Hauy MarumII; Henry AbensurII
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      22 Sept 2010
    • Date of issue
      Jan 2010

    History

    • Accepted
      22 June 2009
    • Reviewed
      05 June 2009
    • Received
      20 Jan 2009
    Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: revista@cardiol.br