Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve during Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Abstracts

Background:

A coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) ≥ 2 is adequate to infer a favorable prognosis or the absence of significant coronary artery disease.

Objective:

To identify parameters which are relevant to obtain CFVR (adequate or inadequate) in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

Methods:

100 patients referred for detection of myocardial ischemia by DSE were evaluated; they were instructed to discontinue the use of β-blockers 72 hours prior to the test. CFVR was calculated as a ratio of the diastolic peak velocity (cm/s) (DPV) on DSE (DPV-DSE) to baseline DPV at rest (DPV-Rest). In group I, CFVR was < 2 and, in group II, CFVR was ≥ 2. The Fisher's exact test and Student's t test were used for the statistical analyses. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results:

At rest, the time (in seconds) to obtain Doppler in LAD in groups I and II was not different (53±31 vs. 45±32; p=0.23). During DSE, LAD was recorded in 92 patients. Group I patients were older (65.9±9.3 vs. 61.2±10.8 years; p=0.04), had lower ejection fraction (61±10 vs. 66±6%; p=0.005), higher DPV-Rest (36.81±08 vs. 25.63 ± 06cm/s; p<0.0001) and lower CFVR (1.67 ± 0.24 vs. 2.53 ± 0.57; p<0.0001), but no difference was observed regarding DPVDSE (61.40±16 vs. 64.23±16cm/s; p=0.42). β-blocker discontinuation was associated with a 4-fold higher chance of a CFVR < 2 (OR= 4; 95% CI [1.171-13.63], p=0.027).

Conclusion:

DPV-Rest was the main parameter to determine an adequate CFVR. β-blocker discontinuation was significantly associated with inadequate CFVR. The high feasibility and the time to record the LAD corroborate the use of this methodology.

Coronary artery disease; Echocardiography, stress / methods; Coronary flow velocity reserve

Fundamento:

A reserva de velocidade de fluxo coronariano (RVFC) ≥ 2 é adequada para inferir bom prognóstico ou ausência de coronariopatia importante.

Objetivo:

Identificar parâmetros relevantes na obtenção da RVFC (adequada ou inadequada) na descendente anterior (ADA), durante o ecocardiograma sob estresse com dobutamina (EED).

Métodos:

Avaliação de 100 pacientes encaminhados para pesquisa de isquemia miocárdica através do EED, orientados para suspender o betabloqueador 72 horas antes do exame. Calculou-se a RVFC pela divisão do pico de velocidade (cm/s) diastólica (PVD) verificado no EED (PVD-EED) pelo de repouso (PVD-REP). No grupo I, a RVFC < 2 e no grupo II a RVFC ≥ 2. Foram utilizados o teste t de Student e o exato de Fisher. Significância estatística quando p < 0,05.

Resultados:

Em repouso, o tempo (segundos) para obter o Doppler na ADA nos grupos I e II não diferiu (53 ± 31 vs. 45 ± 32; p = 0,23). No EED, registrou-se a ADA em 92 pacientes. O grupo I evidenciou pacientes mais velhos (65,9 ± 9,3 vs. 61,2 ± 10,8 anos; p = 0,04), menor fração de ejeção (61 ± 10 vs. 66 ± 6%; p = 0,005), maior PVD-REP (36,81 ± 08 vs. 25,63 ± 06 cm/s; p < 0,0001) e menor RVFC (1,67 ± 0,24 vs. 2,53 ± 0,57; p < 0,0001), entretanto o PVD-EED não diferiu (61,40 ± 16 vs. 64,23 ± 16 cm/s; p = 0,42). A suspensão do betabloqueador associou-se à chance 4 vezes maior de ocorrer RVFC < 2 (OR = 4; 95% IC [1,171 - 13,63], p = 0,027).

Conclusão:

O PVD-REP foi o principal parâmetro para determinar uma RVFC adequada. A suspensão do betabloqueador associou-se significativamente com RVFC inadequada. A elevada exequibilidade e o tempo para registro da ADA favorecem a utilização dessa metodologia.

Doença da artéria coronariana; Ecocardiografia sob estresse / métodos; Reserva de velocidade de fluxo coronariano

Introduction

Pharmacological-stress echocardiography is a safe and accurate noninvasive method for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD)^{1 - 4}. It has been verified that enhancement of the diastolic component of the flow determined by dobutamine, dipyridamole or adenosine may be used for the calculation of the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR)^{5 - 19}.

Measurement of the CFVR by transthoracic echocardiography has already been validated for the assessment of the right and left coronary systems^{15 , 16 , 20}, and has become an important tool in the functional analysis of the anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Studies have demonstrated that a CFVR ≥ 2 is adequate and relevant to infer the absence of significant coronary occlusion, and is correlated with a favorable prognosis in the context of the coronary artery analyzed^{7 , 10 - 12 , 19 , 21 - 27}. Several publications have shown that the authors succeed in recording the LAD flow in approximately 90% of cases; this allows high feasibility of the measurement of CFVR by echocardiography, thus corroborating the use of a safe, validated and reproducible method in the clinical practice^{5 - 13}.

It has been verified that the invasive assessment of CFVR may be influenced by factors such as age, blood pressure, heart rate, left ventricular hypertrophy, degree of coronary impairment, and others²⁸.

Few data are available in the literature regarding the assessment of the functional status of the LAD using dobutamine transthoracic echocardiography. However, regardless of the drug used, the CFVR calculation may be affected for different reasons. Thus, the objective of this study was to identify relevant parameters to obtain an adequate (≥ 2) or inadequate CFVR in the LAD during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

Methods

Study patients

This is a cross-sectional study of 100 patients referred by their physicians for the investigation of myocardial ischemia by means of DSE. The patients had been previously instructed to discontinue the use of betablockers (β-blocker) 72 hours before undergoing the test.

After history taking, the presence of risk factors for CAD and of possible contraindications for DSE was verified. Arterial hypertension²⁹ was defined as a systolic blood pressure > 140mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 90mmHg. Diabetes mellitus³⁰ was confirmed by a fasting plasma glucose > 126mg/dL. Dyslipidemia³¹ was considered when total cholesterol > 220mg/dL. The use of antihypertensive drugs, oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin or lipid-lowering drugs was also considered a risk factor for CAD. Patients who had not quit smoking for less than one year prior to the study were considered smokers.

Exclusion criteria were uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, recent myocardial infarction (MI) (occurring less than one month prior to DSE), significant heart valve disease, prostate disease, or glaucoma with contraindication for the use of atropine, and non-sinus rhythm.

All patients were given information on the risks and objectives of the test, which was only performed after their giving verbal consent.

Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

The Vivid 7 (GE Healthcare) ultrasound system with second-harmonic imaging and the M4S multifrequency transducer with frequency ranging from 2 to 4MHz were used. The left ventricle (LV) was visualized in the apical views (4 and 2-chamber) and parasternal views (long and short axes) at rest and during the use of dobutamine at the doses of 10 (low dose), 20, 30, up to 40µg/kg/min at 3-min intervals; the rest, low-dose, peak and recovery images were compared in a four-division screen. Atropine could be associated after the second stage at up-titration doses of 0.25mg, up to the maximum cumulative dose of 2mg, with the purpose of terminating the test. DSE was considered terminated when a target heart rate (HR) higher than 85% of the maximum HR (220 - age) was achieved, and/or myocardial ischemia had been determined. Ischemia was considered in the presence of a report of typical angina, new wall motion abnormality, or worsening of a pre-existing wall motion abnormality (except from akinesia to dyskinesia). Tests should be interrupted in the presence of intolerance to medication, hypertensive peak (blood pressure > 230 x 120 mmHg) or cardiac arrhythmia^{3 , 32}.

The LV was divided into 16 segments. For the wall motion scoring of each segment, the following patterns were observed: normal = 1; hypokinesia = 2; akinesia = 3; or dyskinesia = 4. For the calculation of the segmental wall motion score index (SWMSI), the points obtained were divided by 16^{1 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 12}.

Anterior Descending Coronary Artery and Coronary Flow Reserve Velocity Recordings

In the same left lateral position in which DSE was performed, the LAD was recorded at its mid-distal portion with a specific pre-established preset. From the low parasternal long axis recording, with clockwise rotation of the transducer, disappearance of the right ventricle was determined, with visualization of the interventricular sulcus, region in which the LAD imaging would be obtained. Other options were visualization from the position of three modified chambers or two concomitant chambers, with slight angle adjustments or transducer rotation.

Using a small color-Doppler box with Nyquist limit of approximately 20 cm/s, the LAD was identified as a tubular image in which the greatest possible stretching and extension were determined, as well as the lowest angle with the Doppler cursor, whose sample volume measured 2mm. Using pulsed Doppler, the flow assessed was characterized by the biphasic spectrum with diastolic predominance, and antegrade curves above baseline were recorded. Initially, the Doppler velocity scale was limited to 80 cm/s and could be amplified during DSE, thus permitting caption of the subsequent increases in the velocities of the Doppler curves.

In the electrocardiogram-gated Doppler of the LAD, diastolic peak velocities (DPV) were recorded, and three spectral curves, not necessarily continuous, but with good quality and higher velocities were selected at rest and during stress. The CFVR was obtained by dividing DPV (mean of three peaks) found during DSE by the baseline DPV (mean of three peaks) recorded at rest^{6 - 8 , 10 , 12 , 15 , 20 , 22}.

Study protocol

After echocardiographic assessment for routine measurements, the LAD was studied. Immediately after placement of the color box in the ultrasound scanner screen, the time spent to obtain the LAD recording by color and pulsed Doppler was counted. Only cases with recordings of Doppler spectral curves obtained in less than 180 seconds would remain in the study. Using the same transducer, visualization of two-dimensional LV imaging was alternated with Doppler of the LAD. Thus, the DSE four-division screen was filled in the different stages, concomitantly with the different DPV measurements until termination of the test. As soon as the test was terminated, the DSE result was defined and the CFVR was calculated. Patients with a CFVR < 2 comprised group I (GI) and those with an adequate CFVR (≥ 2) comprised group II (GII). SWMSI was calculated in a further stage.

Statistical Analysis

The proportion of individuals with an adequate coronary reserve was compared in the different categories of one same independent variable using the Fisher's exact test. Likewise, the distributions of continuous independent variables, according to the presence or absence of an adequate coronary reserve, were compared using the Student's t test.

Univariate logistic regression models between independent variables and coronary reserve (adequate and inadequate) were made, and variables with a p value < 0.250 were included in the multivariate models. The objective of the multivariate analysis was to describe the relationship between β-blocker discontinuation and coronary reserve, adjusted for potential confounders.

Results

Feasibility

Of the 110 cases initially assessed, 10 were excluded because the time for LAD recording by Doppler exceeded 180 seconds. Consequently, the feasibility for recordings at rest to be obtained within the established time was 91%.

DSEs were performed uneventfully, and DPV could be verified in 92% (92/100) of patients. Of the eight patients not assessed during DSE, the LV twist determined by left bundle branch block impaired visualization in two cases; in the other six, the vigorous heart movements did not allow the recording. Atropine was added in 93% of patients, at a mean dose of 0.68 ± 0.53 mg.

Clinical Characteristics

GI was comprised of 32 patients (CFVR < 2) and GII of 60 patients with CFVR ≥ 2 (Figures 1 and 2); patients in GI were older (66±9 vs. 61±11 years; p=0.04).

Figure 1
Diastolic peak velocity (DPV), coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and correlated heart rate (HR). Group I: DPV= 45cm/s and HR= 65bpm at rest (A) with DPV= 77cm/s and HR= 139bpm during stress (B), determining CFVR= 1.71 after achieving the target HR (138). Group II: DPV= 34cm/s and HR= 90bpm at rest (C) with DPV = 89cm/s and HR= 137bpm during stress (D), determining CFVR= 2.61 after achieving the target HR (131).

Figure 2
CFVR = 3 was obtained early (HR= 118bpm) in relation to the target HR (140bpm).

There was no difference between the groups (p=NS) as regards the distribution by gender, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, history of CAD, and previous coronary intervention (whether surgical or by catheterization) or MI. Among patients receiving ASA, 48.5% had an inadequate CFVR; among those not receiving ASA, the proportion was 27% (p = 0.044) (Table 1).

Table 1
Characteristics of a sample (N=92) of patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography, according to the category of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR)

Clinical characteristics	Total	Group I	Group II	p
		(CFVR < 2)	(CFVR ≥ 2)
		N (%)	N (%)
Male	53	14 (45)	39(65)	0.07
Female	39	18 (46)	21 (54)
Hypertension
- Absent	26	6 (23)	20(77)	0.155
- Present	66	26 (39.4)	40 (60.6)
Dyslipidemia
- Absent	33	12 (36.4)	21 (63.6)	0.823
- Present	59	20 (34)	39(66)
Diabetes
- Absent	75	26 (34.7)	49 (65.3)	1.000
- Present	17	6(35.3)	11 (64.7)
Use of ASA
- No	59	16 (27)	43(73)	0.044
- Yes	33	16 (48.5)	17 (51.5)
Use of Statin
- No	49	17 (34.7)	32 (65.3)	1.000
- Yes	43	15 (35)	28(65)
Use of ACE or ARA Inhibitor				1.000
- No	45	16 (35.6)	29 (64.4)
- Yes	47	16 (34)	31 (66)
Use of Nitrate
- No	86	29 (34)	57(66)	0.416
- Yes	6	3 (50)	3 (50)
Betablocker
- Did not take or did not discontinue	70	18 (26)	52(74)	0.002
- Discontinued	22	14 (64)	8 (36)
History of CAD
- Absent	67	20 (30)	47(70)	0.140
- Present	25	12 (48)	13 (52)
Previous CI
- Absent	72	24 (33)	48(67)	0.603
- Present	20	8 (40)	12 (60)
Previous IM
- Absent	87	31 (35.6)	56 (64.4)	0.655
- Present	5	1 (20)	4 (80)

• ASA: Acetyl salicylic acid; ACE: Angiotensin converting enzyme; ARA: Angiotensin receptor antagonist; CAD: Coronary artery disease; CI: Coronary intervention; MI: Myocardial infarction.

All patients were instructed to discontinue β-blocker for 72 hours prior to DSE, and only two of them failed to do so. Both were from GI and their DSE was negative for ischemia. Considering the 22 patients who discontinued the medication, β-blocker was classified as selective in 8 (57%) of the 14 GI patients, whereas in GII, β-blocker was selective in 3 (37.5%) of the 8 cases. Among the 22 patients who discontinued β-blocker, 64% had an inadequate CFVR, whereas among those who did not take or did not discontinue β-blocker, the percentage of inadequate CFVR was 26% (p = 0.002).

There was no difference between the groups as regards their BMI (27.7±6.7 vs. 27.5±3.8 kg/m²; p= 0.87). Among the 92 patients, 40 (43.5%) were overweight (BMI≥ 25 kg/m²⁾, 22 (24.5%) were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²⁾ and one had morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m^{2) 30 , 33}.

Echocardiographic Recordings and Hemodynamic Data

LV ejection fraction in GI and GII were different (61±10 vs. 65.8±5.7%; p= 0.005). There were no differences (p = NS) between the groups regarding LV mass, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) at rest and in DSE, or the double product (Table 2). In GII, higher HR were achieved during DSE (148±12 vs. 141±20bpm; p= 0.04); however, in only 20% (18 cases) of the study patients the DSE was terminated with maximum HR. Among patients who achieved maximum HR, 66.7% showed CFVR < 2, whereas CFVR was inadequate in 27% of those who did not achieve maximum HR (p = 0.002).

Table 2
Echocardiographic and hemodynamic recordings, according to categories (Groups I and II) of coronary flow velocity reserve

	Parameters	Group I (N = 32)		Group II (N = 60)		p
		Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
Left ventricle
	Ejection fraction (%)	61	1.8	65.8	0.7	0.005
	Mass (gr)	250.5	17.5	232.4	8.9	0.30
	Mass / BS (gr/m2)	142.5	9.2	128.5	4.7	0.13
Heart rate (bpm)
	Baseline	72	2.3	67	1.4	0.058
	During DSE	141	3.5	148	1.5	0.04
Blood pressure (mmHg)
	Systolic (Baseline)	131	3.3	126	1.8	0.17
	Systolic (DSE)	151	3.1	152	2.1	0.08
	Diastolic (Baseline)	78	1.3	78	0.8	0.85
	Diastolic (DSE)	83	1.7	80	1.2	0.25
	Double Product (mmHg x bpm) during DSE	21263	685	22423	380	0.11

• BS: Body surface; DSE: Dobutamine stress echocardiography; Double product: systolic blood pressure x heart rate.

Five DSEs were inconclusive (all in GI); six were positive for myocardial ischemia, three in each group; and only in one case the anterior wall was affected (GI). SWMSI was not different between the groups (1.05±0.2 vs. 1.02±0.7; p= 0.24) during DSE.

Doppler recording of the LAD

The mean time to obtain Doppler spectrum of the LAD in both groups was shorter than one minute, with no differences between them (p = 0.23). Likewise, the mean HR at the moment the DPVs were obtained, whether at baseline or during DSE, were not significantly different between the groups either. In 33 (55%) of GII patients, an adequate CFVR was obtained before achieving the established target HR.

The baseline DPV in GI was higher than in GII (36.8 ± 8.4 vs. 25.6±5.7cm/s; p< 0.0001). However, there was no difference between DPVs obtained during DSE (61.4±16.6 vs. 64.2±15.9cm/s; p=0.42), thus resulting in CFVR of GI < GII (1.66±0.24 vs. 2.53±5.7; p< 0.0001) (Table 3).

Table 3
Measurements obtained during Doppler in the anterior descending coronary artery

	GI		GII		p
	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
Tempo (segundos) para obter o Doppler na ADA	53	5.5	45	4.1	0.23
FC ao registrar PVD
Basal (bpm)	72	2.3	67	1.4	0.058
Durante o EED (bpm)	123	5.0	119	2.7	0.47
PVD (cm/s) Basal	36.8	0.014	25.6	0.07	< 0.0001
PVD (cm/s) no EED	61.4	0.029	64.2	0.020	0.42
RVFC(PVD no EED÷PVD basal)	1.67	0.042	2.53	0.073	< 0.0001

• LAD: Left anterior descending coronary artery; HR: heart rate, DPV: Diastolic peak velocity; DSE: Dobutamine stress echocardiography; CFVR: Coronary flow velocity reserve.

Multivariate analysis of parameters

In the multivariate model, the logistic regression analysis for CFVR < 2 showed significance for age and for β-blocker discontinuation (Table 4). The multivariate model was adjusted for potential confounders, and patients who had discontinued β-blocker had a four-fold higher chance of showing an inadequate CFVR (Table 5).

Table 4
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for CFVR < 2

Parameters	OR	p	CI 95%
			IL	SL
Age	1.053882	0.037	1.003145	1.107185
Ejection F.	0.9426074	1.181	0.8644104	1.027878
LV Mass /BS	1.004491	0.517	0.9909688	1.018197
Betablocker	3.997332	0.027	1.17166	13.63763
ASA	1.460583	0.598	0.3569187	5.976994
SH	1.07366	0.913	0.3009711	3.830089
CAD	0.778762	0.747	0.1709659	3.547317

• OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; LL: Lower limit; UL: Upper limit; LV Mass/BS: left ventricular mass indexed for body surface; ASA: acetyl salicylic acid; SH: systemic hypertension; CAD: coronary artery disease.

Table 5
Multivariate models of the relationship between variables and coronary flow velocity reserve as measured by dobutamine stress echocardiography

Multivariate model	OR	Standard Deviation	95% CI OR	p
Betablocker£	5.05	2.6	1.82 - 14.03	0.002
Betablocker¥	3.9	2.5	1.17 - 13.64	0.027
Betablocker€	4.17	2.4	1.35 - 12.82	0.013

• ^£
  Modelo não ajustado.
• ^¥
  Modelo completo, ajustado para idade, fração de ejeção, massa do ventrículo esquerdo/superfície corporal, uso de AAS, hipertensão arterial, doença arterial coronariana.
• ^€
  Modelo ajustado para idade e fração de ejeção. As demais variáveis, quando retiradas do modelo completo, modificaram o OR em menos de 10%.

Discussion

In the daily practice, it is important to consider the time spent to perform the procedures. For this reason, we limited the time to obtain Doppler recordings (color and pulsed) of the LAD at rest at 180 seconds (period of one DSE stage), with a significant success rate (91%). During DSE, the high performance (92%) of Doppler recording of the LAD was maintained, and the feasibility rates were comparable to those of other studies using dobutamine or vasodilators.

In the present study, we sought to verify clinical, echocardiographic or hemodynamic parameters associated with the CFVR cut-off point established as adequate. Patient inclusion was not limited by the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, and these factors were not significantly associated with adequate or inadequate CFVR. GI patients were older and had a lower mean ejection fraction, factors that may be related to a low CFVR.

In the univariate analysis, the use of ASA was associated with inadequate CFVR. However, in the multivariate analysis, this was not demonstrated (Table 4).

β-blockers decrease the possibility of ischemia by reducing the cardiac work. Thus, discontinuation of these drugs promotes a higher HR, and this could increase the probability of a more frequent occurrence of DSE with achieved target HR or consistent with myocardial ischemia. Previous findings suggest that non-selective β-blocker increases coronary vascular resistance³⁴. On the other hand, the use of selective β-blocker increases myocardial perfusion and improves coronary flow reserve, thus reducing the possibility of ischemia^{35 , 36}. In methodologies of studies related to stress echocardiography, some authors do not interfere in the use of β-blocker^{5 , 8}, whereas others discontinue the drug for 24 to 48 hours prior to DSE^{3 , 7 , 32}. In our study, patients were instructed to discontinue the drug for 72-hour with the purpose of reducing the occurrence of inconclusive DSE. However, the findings showed an additional importance regarding the effect of this drug, since a significant association between β-blocker discontinuation and the occurrence of inadequate CFVR was observed (Table 1). This finding could be related to the loss of a protective effect of the β-blocker, although we cannot rule out that this result had been related to peculiar characteristics of the study sample.

In the multivariate model, the statistical analysis showed significance for age and β-blocker discontinuation (Tables 4 and 5). During this time window of β-blocker discontinuation, the patients had a four-fold higher chance of presenting inadequate CFVR. This is an interesting observation and suggests that we should be aware of the selectivity of the β-blocker in use and of the doses administered (characteristics that were not recorded for all patients), and question whether there is a better time interval for β-blocker discontinuation when evaluating CFVR by dobutamine transthoracic echocardiography.

In Meimon et al study⁷, the CFVR obtained in the general population with adenosine (2.5) and dobutamine (2.4) was similar to that found in group II of the present study (2.53). Meimon et al⁷ study patients with wall motion abnormalities consistent with ischemia on DSE showed low CFVR with adenosine (1.5) and dobutamine (1.6), values close to those found in our group with low CFVR (1.67). However, we did not find correlation with wall motion abnormality. We point out that 91% (43/47) of Meimon et al study patients⁷ had known CAD. It is possible that, in addition to different populations, the time of β-blocker discontinuation, dose and selectivity, as well as the HR achieved may have determined different results in the two studies.

CFVR can increase progressively with the increase in HR in patients without wall motion abnormality consistent with ischemia during DSE⁷ or those at a low risk for CAD with DSE without ischemic response¹². Also, increases in CFVR can be limited or even reduced in the presence of wall motion abnormality consistent with ischemia of the anterior wall^{5 , 8}. Although GI had lower CFVR, the recordings did not show a reduction in DPV values during DSE.

The mean DPV obtained during DSE in the two groups of our study were not different, and we should point out that the mean HR at the moment of the DPV recordings did not differ either. This finding is relevant since, in principle, we know that DPVs increase concomitantly with the increase in HR. The mean HR recorded at the end of DSE were higher, and this suggests a difficulty to obtain Doppler of the LAD in periods closer to the maximum HR obtained.

It was very important to have found that GII patients showed lower DPVs at rest; however, DPVs were similar between the two groups during DSE, thus making the value obtained at rest the determinant factor to result in an adequate CFVR.

Limitations

The learning curve was an important phase to be addressed before the beginning of this study, since LAD recording during DSE is very arduous.

Although the number of study patients was satisfactory in comparison to those of other studies, a larger sample could maybe provide more information regarding the parameters assessed. Additionally, the posology of the β-blocker used was not recorded. Like in other studies^{5 , 8 , 12}, the patients did not undergo coronary angiography, and this makes it impossible to know whether CFVR, be it adequate or not, could be related to impairment of the stenotic large epicardial coronary arteries and/or of the microcirculation. The lower number of DSEs at a maximum HR level may have compromised the accuracy of the assessment of ischemia for wall motion abnormality, which could have contributed to the occurrence of false-negative DSEs³⁷. Another important limitation was that the inter- and intraobserver variation for DPV measurements was not calculated. A possibility that cannot be ruled out, although unlikely, is that recordings of a diagonal branch had been misinterpreted as those of LAD.

Like in other studies, ours assessed only LAD. We calculated the coronary reserve by means of velocity, not flow; however, this becomes less relevant since the analysis of flow velocity may represent the functional status of the vessel, and CFVR calculation is the result of a ratio.

Clinical Applications

The literature shows that the finding of an adequate CFVR is of great diagnostic or prognostic value, and represents a relevant complementary information for clinical, interventionist or surgical decision-making.

Considering the territory supplied by the LAD, it is important to notice that, even in cases of inconclusive DSEs by the criteria of HR achieved, it is possible to obtain a CFVR ≥ 2 and infer that perfusion is satisfactory in that region. Likewise, obtaining an adequate CFVR, concomitantly with normal segmental anterior wall motion by the end of a terminated DSE, may contribute to the echocardiographic diagnosis of absence of ischemia in this myocardial segment, especially in tests in which the maximum HR is not achieved.

The availability, low cost, reproducibility and accuracy of this method, make it an important tool for the functional assessment of the coronary artery. In this study, we evaluated parameters that could or not be related to an adequate CFVR. In this context, conditions such as DPV at rest, age, ejection fraction, and the use of medication may be significantly associated.

Conclusions

The DPV obtained at rest is an important parameter in the determination of an adequate CFVR. β-blocker discontinuation was significantly associated with an inadequate CFVR. The high feasibility and short time interval spent for recording the LAD corroborates the application of this method in the daily practice.

Author contributions

Conception and design of the research: Abreu JS; Acquisition of data: Abreu JS, Diógenes TCP, Gomes Neto PS; Analysis and interpretation of the data: Abreu JS, Lima JWO, Siqueira JM, Paes Júnior JN; Statistical analysis: Lima JWO; Writing of the manuscript: Abreu JS, Lima JWO, Siqueira JM, Pimentel NL, Gomes Neto PS, Abreu MEB, Paes Júnior JN; Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Abreu JS, Lima JWO.

Referências

• ¹
  Mathias W Jr, Arruda A, Santos FC, Arruda AL, Mattos E, Osório A, et al. Safety of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective experience of 4033 consecutive studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12(10):785-91.
• ²
  Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JR. Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(3):595-606.
• ³
  Abreu JS, Diógenes TC, Farias AG, Morais JM, Paes Júnior JN. Segurança e exeqüibilidade do ecocardiograma sob estresse com dobutamina e atropina em pacientes octogenários. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005;85(3):198-204.
• ⁴
  Geleijnse ML, Krenning BJ, Nemes A, et al. Incidence, pathophysiology, and treatment of complications during dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 2010; 121: 1756-67.
• ⁵
  Takeuchi M, Miyazaki C, Yoshitani H, Otani S, Sakamoto K, Yoshikawa J. Assessment of coronary flow velocity with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(1):117-23.
• ⁶
  Meimoun P, Benali T, Sayah S, Luycs-Bore A, Boulanger J, Zemir H, et al. Evaluation of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis of intermediate severity using transthoracic coronary flow reserve and dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(12):1233-40.
• ⁷
  Meimoun P, Sayah S, Tcheuffa JC, Benali T, Luycx-Bore A, Levy F, et al. Transthoracic coronary flow velocity reserve assessment: comparison between adenosine and dobutamine. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(10):1220-8.
• ⁸
  Ahmari SA, Modesto K, Bunch J, Stussy V, Dichak A, Seward J, et al. Doppler derived coronary flow reserve during dobutamine stress echocardiography further improves detection of myocardial ischemia. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7(2):134-40.
• ⁹
  Soylu O, Celik S, Karakus G, Yldrim A, Ergelen M, Zencirci E, et al. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow imaging in identification of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left bundle branch block. Echocardiography. 2008;25(10):1065-70.
• ¹⁰
  D'Andrea A, Severino S, Mita C, Riegler L, Cocchia R, Gravina R, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with intermediate stenosis of left anterior descending coronary artery after deferral of revascularization on the basis of noninvasive coronary flow reserve measurement. Echocardiography. 2009;26(4):431-40.
• ¹¹
  Hyodo E, Hirata K, Hirose M, Sakanoue Y, Nishida Y, Aray K, et al. Detection of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in three major coronary arteries by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(5):553-9.
• ¹²
  Forte EH, Rousse MG, Lowenstein JA. Target heart rate to determine the normal value of coronary flow reserve during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011;9:10.
• ¹³
  Lowenstein J. Evaluation of the coronary flow reserve in three coronary territories by transthoracic echocardiography approach. Is it magic realism? Rev Bras Ecocardiogr Imagem Cardiovasc. 2010;23(3):82-98.
• ¹⁴
  Murata E, Hozumi T, Matsumura Y, Fujimoto K, Sugioka K, Takemoto Y, et al. Coronary flow velocity reserve measurement in three major coronary arteries using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2006;23(4):279-86.
• ¹⁵
  Hozumi T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, Asami Y, Ogata Y, Takagi T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with invasive technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(5):1251-9.
• ¹⁶
  Caiati C, Montaldo C, Zedda N, Montisci R, Ruscazio M, Lai G, et al. Validation of a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) for the evaluation of coronary flow reserve: comparison with intracoronary Doppler flow wire. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(4):1193-200.
• ¹⁷
  Saraste M, Koskenvuo J, Knuuti J, Toikka J, Laine H, Niemi P, et al. Coronary flow reserve: measurement with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is reproducible and comparable with positron emission tomography. Clin Physiol. 2001;21(1):114-22.
• ¹⁸
  Osório AF, Tsutsui JM, Kowatsch I, Guera VC, Ramires JA, Lemos PA, et al. Evaluation of blood flow reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery territory by quantitative myocardial contrast and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(6):709-16.
• ¹⁹
  Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Sicari R, Gherardi S, Bovenzi F, Picano E. Prognostic correlates of combined coronary flow reserve assessment on left anterior descending and right coronary artery in patients with negative stress echocardiography by wall motion criteria. Heart. 2009;95(17):1423-8.
• ²⁰
  Ueno Y, Nakamura Y, Takashima H, Kinoshita M, Soma A. Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the right coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison with intracoronary Doppler guidewire. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(10 Pt 1):1074-9.
• ²¹
  Holte E, Vegsundvåg J, Hegbom K, Hole T, Wiseth R. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for detection of stenoses in the left coronary artery by use of poststenotic coronary flow profiles: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary flow reserve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(1):77-85.
• ²²
  Hozumi T, Yoshida K, Ogata Y, Akasaka T, Asami Y, Takagi T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of significant left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1998;97(16):1557-62.
• ²³
  Voci P, Pizzuto F, Mariano E, Puddu PE, Chiavari PA, Romeo F. Measurement of coronary flow reserve in the anterior and posterior descending coronary arteries by transthoracic Doppler ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(9):988-91.
• ²⁴
  Matsumura Y, Hozumi T, Watanabe H, Fujimoto K, Sugioka K, Takemoto Y, et al. Cut-off value of coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for diagnosis of significant left anterior descending artery stenosis in patients with coronary risk factors. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(12):1389-93.
• ²⁵
  Dimitrow PP. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography-noninvasive diagnostic window for coronary flow reserve assessment. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2003;1:4.
• ²⁶
  Rigo F. Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab: from pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005;3:8.
• ²⁷
  Mladenovic Z, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Tavciovski D, Angelkov AR, Jovic Z, Djuric P. The additive diagnostic role of coronary flow reserve in noninvasive evaluation of coronary stenosis on left descending artery previously detected by multislice computed tomography. Echocardiography. 2013;30(3):338-44.
• ²⁸
  Baumgart D, Haude M, Liu F, Ge J, Goerge G, Erbel R. Current concepts of coronary flow reserve for clinical decision making during cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J. 1998;136(1):136-49.
• ²⁹
  Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, Sociedade Brasileira de Hipertensão, Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. V Diretrizes brasileiras de hipertensão arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007;89(3):e24-e79
• ³⁰
  Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36 Suppl 1:S11-66.
• ³¹
  Sposito AC, Caramelli B, Fonseca FA, Bertolami MC, Afiune Neto A, Souza AD, et al.; Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. IV Diretriz brasileira sobre dislipidemias e prevenção da aterosclerose. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007;88(supl 1):1-18.
• ³²
  Abreu JS, Diógenes TC, Abreu AL, Barreto JE, Morais JM, Abreu ME, et al. Internal thoracic artery graft (ITAG): patency and functional status at rest and during dobutamine-stress echocardiography. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008;90(1):37-45.
• ³³
  Brandão AP, Brandão AA, Nogueira AR, Suplicy H, Guimarães JI, Oliveira JEP, et al; Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. I Diretriz brasileira de diagnóstico e tratamento da síndrome metabólica. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005;84(supl 1):1-28.
• ³⁴
  Kern MJ, Ganz P, Horowitz JD, Gaspar J, Barry WH, Lorell BH, et al. Potentiation of coronary vasoconstriction by beta-adrenergic blockade in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1983;67(6):1178-85.
• ³⁵
  Böttcher M, Czernin J, Sun K, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of beta 1 adrenergic receptor blockade on myocardial blood flow and vasodilatory capacity. J Nucl Med. 1997;38(3):442-6.
• ³⁶
  Billinger M, Seiler C, Fleisch M, Eberli FR, Meier B, Hess OM. Do beta-adrenergic blocking agents increase coronary flow reserve? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):1866-71.
• ³⁷
  Makani H, Bangalore S, Halpern D, Makwana HG, Chaudhry FA. Cardiac outcomes with submaximal normal stress echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(15):1393-401.

• Sources of Funding There were no external funding sources for this study.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  21 Dec 2013
• Date of issue
  Mar 2014

History

• Received
  21 May 2013
• Reviewed
  11 Aug 2013
• Accepted
  20 Aug 2013