Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Does Galectin-3 (Myocardial Fibrosis Biomarker) Predict Progression in Chagas Disease?

Galectin 3; Apoptosis; Endomyocardial Fibrosis; Chagas Disease Biomarkers

In recent decades, the epidemiology of Chagas disease (Chd) has changed significantly as a consequence of urbanization and migration.11. Martins-Melo FR, Carneiro M, Ramos Jr AN, Heukelbach J, RibeiroALP, Werneck GL. The burden of Neglected Tropical Diseases in Brazil, 1990-2016: A subnational analysis from the Global Burdenof Disease Study 2016. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018; 12(6):e0006559. In Brazil, to date, it is the neglected disease with the highest burden, of which ~30% of individuals will progress to the symptomatic tissue disruptive stage within 20 – 30 years after being infected22. Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE et al. Chagas Cardiomyopathy: An Update of Current Clinical Knowledge and Management A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 Sep 18;138(12):e169-e209. (around 2% per year progress from the indeterminate to the cardiac form, according to a contemporary study).33. Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VM, Di Lorenzo OC, Antunes AP, Menezes MM, et al. Ten-year incidence of Chagas cardiomyopathy among asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-seropositive former blood donors. Circulation 2013; 127(10):1105-15.

Persistent myocardial inflammation and fibrosis represent the main pathological characteristics of Chd that would be correlated with its progression.44. Chaves AT, Menezes CAS, Costa HS, Nunes MCP, Rocha MOC. Myocardial fibrosis in chagas disease and molecules related to fibrosis. Parasite Immunol 2019; 41(10): e12663.,55. Bonney KM, Luthringer DJ, Kim SA, Garg NJ, Engman DM. Pathology and Pathogenesis of Chagas Heart Disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2019; 14: 421-47. The use of myocardial fibrosis biomarkers to predict progression in patients with normal or near normal LV function is certainly important in Chd, where traditional risk factors, such as LVEF, may not be as useful. Nevertheless, studies have shown the value of myocardial fibrosis biomarkers in the progression of Chd pathogenesis.66. L. Giordanengo L, Gea S, Barbieri G, Rabinovich GA. Anti-galectin-1 autoantibodies in human Trypanosoma cruzi infection: differential expression of this β- galactoside-binding protein in cardiac Chagas’ disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol 2001; 124(2):266–73.

In this edition, Fernandes et al.77. Fernandes F, Moreira CHV, Oliveira LC, Souza-Basqueira M, Ianni BM, di Lorenzo C, et al. Galectina-3 Associada a Formas Graves e Mortalidade em Longo Prazo em Pacientes com Doença de Chagas. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(2):248-256. present data that contributes to our understanding related to the burden of myocardial fibrosis in different stages of Chd. To this end, the authors assessed the presence (or not) of Galectin-3 (Gal-3), a myocardial fibrosis biomarker, in different stages of the disease compared to a control group and whether it is associated with mortality or need for a heart transplant in the most advanced stage of the disease. For this purpose, 2 studies with different designs were carried out. Initially, in order to stratify the groups by the Chagas cardiomyopathy (CC) status using a cross-sectional study design, 330 patients seropositive for T. cruzi (187 without cardiomyopathy; 46 CC-abnormal ECG and LVEF>50%; and 97 CC-abnormal ECG with LVEF<50%) were included, in addition to 153 seronegative controls (matched by age and gender). Of these seropositive patients, 97 with more severe cardiac forms of CC were part of the prospective longitudinal study censored until the event (mortality or need for a heart transplant).

The results were summarized and analysed in the different groups. The median age was 49 ± 9.2 years, with a median follow-up of 58 months. Chagas disease patients without cardiomyopathy (n = 187) and those with cardiomyopathy and LVEF >50% (n = 46) had Gal-3 levels similar to those of healthy controls (n = 153), but those with cardiomyopathy and LVEF <50% (n = 97) had significantly higher Gal-3 levels than the healthy controls (p = 0.0001). A significant correlation was observed between Gal-3 levels and LVEF (rs=-0.16, p=0.001). Events were observed in 28 patients (29%). In patients with cardiopathy and LVEF< 50%, the adjusted linear regression model showed a significantly association between Gal-3 levels and death or heart transplantation during a five-year follow-up (Hazard ratio - HR 3.11; 95% CI = 1.21– 8.04; p = 0.019). The authors concluded that in patients with the cardiac form, higher Gal-3 levels were significantly associated with severe forms of the disease and a higher long-term mortality rate, which means that they can be effectively used to identify high-risk patients.

Nevertheless, the major findings of Fernandes et al.77. Fernandes F, Moreira CHV, Oliveira LC, Souza-Basqueira M, Ianni BM, di Lorenzo C, et al. Galectina-3 Associada a Formas Graves e Mortalidade em Longo Prazo em Pacientes com Doença de Chagas. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(2):248-256. were as follows: First, Gal-3 levels did not show any difference between normal individuals and Chd patients without cardiomyopathy and with cardiomyopathy / LVEF >50%. This observation suggests that Gal-3 levels in this patient sample could be not used as a marker of myocardial disease progression . The second important finding of this study was that the higher Gal-3 levels were significantly associated with the severe forms of the disease and a higher long-term mortality rate. This result is not unique to Chd, as similar findings were seen in the studies by Nagase et al.88. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 69(3):562-73. and Spinale.99. Spinale FG. Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases: influence on cardiac form and function. Physiol Rev 2007; 87(4):1285-342.

The interpretation of these results should consider the small number of patients who had a five-year follow-up and single center experience already quoted by the authors. In the group of patients with cardiomyopathy and LVEF <50%, different degrees of myocardial involvement were possibly used, since there was a wide spectrum of LVEF (ranging from 20% to 40%) leading to different patient profiles included in the groups.77. Fernandes F, Moreira CHV, Oliveira LC, Souza-Basqueira M, Ianni BM, di Lorenzo C, et al. Galectina-3 Associada a Formas Graves e Mortalidade em Longo Prazo em Pacientes com Doença de Chagas. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(2):248-256. It is noticeable that the rate of events was low and significantly inferior to that of the Rassi high risk cohort (annual mortality rate of 5.8% vs. 12.6%); thus, the results from the multivariate analyses, which included 5 independent variables, should be taken with caution due to likely model oversaturation.

One of the mayor challenges in Chd is the difficulty in identifying at an early stage the infected subjects who will be part of those 20% to 30% who might develop cardiomyopathy. Unfortunately, at present there is no way to predict this possible progression. Thus, finding reliable biomarkers of disease progression would mean the greatest leap forward in the history of Chd since its discovery in 1909 by Dr. Carlos Chagas. For this reason, there are numerous research groups devoted to the search of both host-derived and T. cruzi-derived biomarkers.1010. Linhares-Lacerda L, Granato A, Gomes-Neto JF, Conde L, Freire-de-Lima L, de Freitas EO, et al. Circulating Plasma MicroRNA-208a as Potential Biomarker of Chronic Indeterminate Phase of Chagas Disease Front Microbiol. 2018 Mar 6;9:269. Referências This would mean a breakthrough in the management of Chd

Referências

  • 1
    Martins-Melo FR, Carneiro M, Ramos Jr AN, Heukelbach J, RibeiroALP, Werneck GL. The burden of Neglected Tropical Diseases in Brazil, 1990-2016: A subnational analysis from the Global Burdenof Disease Study 2016. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018; 12(6):e0006559.
  • 2
    Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE et al. Chagas Cardiomyopathy: An Update of Current Clinical Knowledge and Management A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 Sep 18;138(12):e169-e209.
  • 3
    Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VM, Di Lorenzo OC, Antunes AP, Menezes MM, et al. Ten-year incidence of Chagas cardiomyopathy among asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-seropositive former blood donors. Circulation 2013; 127(10):1105-15.
  • 4
    Chaves AT, Menezes CAS, Costa HS, Nunes MCP, Rocha MOC. Myocardial fibrosis in chagas disease and molecules related to fibrosis. Parasite Immunol 2019; 41(10): e12663.
  • 5
    Bonney KM, Luthringer DJ, Kim SA, Garg NJ, Engman DM. Pathology and Pathogenesis of Chagas Heart Disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2019; 14: 421-47.
  • 6
    L. Giordanengo L, Gea S, Barbieri G, Rabinovich GA. Anti-galectin-1 autoantibodies in human Trypanosoma cruzi infection: differential expression of this β- galactoside-binding protein in cardiac Chagas’ disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol 2001; 124(2):266–73.
  • 7
    Fernandes F, Moreira CHV, Oliveira LC, Souza-Basqueira M, Ianni BM, di Lorenzo C, et al. Galectina-3 Associada a Formas Graves e Mortalidade em Longo Prazo em Pacientes com Doença de Chagas. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(2):248-256.
  • 8
    Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 69(3):562-73.
  • 9
    Spinale FG. Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases: influence on cardiac form and function. Physiol Rev 2007; 87(4):1285-342.
  • 10
    Linhares-Lacerda L, Granato A, Gomes-Neto JF, Conde L, Freire-de-Lima L, de Freitas EO, et al. Circulating Plasma MicroRNA-208a as Potential Biomarker of Chronic Indeterminate Phase of Chagas Disease Front Microbiol. 2018 Mar 6;9:269. Referências
  • Short Editorial related to the article: Galectin-3 Associated with Severe Forms and Long-term Mortality in Patients with Chagas Disease

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    01 Mar 2021
  • Date of issue
    Feb 2021
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@cardiol.br