SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.94 issue4Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) palpalis (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilinae): description of the immature stages author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Iheringia. Série Zoologia

Print version ISSN 0073-4721On-line version ISSN 1678-4766

Iheringia, Sér. Zool. vol.94 no.4 Porto Alegre Dec. 2004

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212004000400016 

Chromosome studies of Brazilian vespertilionids Lasiurus cinereus and Lasiurus ega (Mammalia, Chiroptera)

 

 

Sandra Regina de Carvalho MarchesinI; Eliana Morielle VersuteII

IDepartamento de Biologia, IBILCE-UNESP
IIDepartamento de Zoologia e Botânica, IBILCE-UNESP, Rua Cristovão Colombo, 2265, 15054-000 São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil. (morielle@dzb.ibilce.unesp.br)

 

 


ABSTRACT

Cytogenetical studies based on conventional coloration by Giemsa, C-banding and Ag-NOR were performed on 2 species of bats from the vespertilionid family: Lasiurus cinereus (Beauvois, 1796) and Lasiurus ega (Gervais, 1856). The 2n was 28 and FN was 48 in both species. The constitutive heterochromatin is located in centromeric regions in the two species and in the short arm of the subtelocentric X chromosome in L. ega. NORs were observed in the secondary constriction of the smaller autosome in both species.

Keywords: Chiroptera, chromosomes, Lasiurus, C-banding, NORs.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

An important tool in the adaptive strategy of an organism is the karyotype. Chromosomal changes play an essential role in the evolution of the species. The number of linkage groups and the arrangement of genes and heterochromatin in chromosomes can affect the amount of variation among offspring, as well as phenotypic expression and gene regulation. Although the exact role that chromosomal change plays in the evolutionary process is not well understood, some authors have argued that a sudden chromosomal evolution is correlated with and facilitates morphological evolution and the rate of speciation (WILSON et al., 1975; BUSH et al.,1977; QUMSIYEH, 1994).

The family Vespertilionidae is among the largest taxa of mammals, representing 42 genera and 355 species (NOWAK, 1999) This family as well as other families of Chiroptera, has been studied from the cytogenetic point of view and the results have permitted to verify that the dynamics of chromosomal evolution varies in different chiropteran taxa. The vespertilionid bats show very little karyological diversity in both intrapopulational and intraspecific level, but when karyotypic diversity exists, it may have been brought about by Robertsonian or non-Robertsonian changes or by both (STOCK, 1983; VOLLETH & TIDEMANN, 1989; VOLLETH & HELLER,1994 a, b).

Despite of the several cytogenetic studies in vespertilionid species, the karyological information is still insufficient to characterize or represent the karyotypic variation in this family. There are few chromosomal studies on Brazilian vespertilionid specimens (VARELLA-GARCIA et al., 1989; FREITAS et al., 1992).

The vespertilionid genus Lasiurus Gray, 1831 is endemic to North and South America. The genus is morphologically distinctive and comprises the tribe Lasiurini (BICKHAM, 1987; SIMMONS & GEISLER, 1998). Evolutionary relationships of Lasiurus to other vespertilionine genera are not established. Morphological, karyological and biochemical data have permied some authors to hypothesizet that Lasiurus diverged early from the primitive vespertilionine stock (HALL & JONES, 1961; MORALES & BICKHAM, 1995).

The number of recognized species of Lasiurus fluctuates in the taxonomic literature and some studies have attempted to investigate the evolutionary relationships between species of Lasiurus and other vespertilionid genera by means of several approaches, such as cytogenetic and molecular studies (BICKHAM, 1987; MORALES & BICKHAM, 1995).

Karyological data have shown that the few chromosomes shared between Lasiurus and other vespertilionid genera are considered to be plesiomorphic (BICKHAM, 1979). This suggests that the Lasiurus species have an early divergence. In Brazilian specimens, only representatives of L. borealis (Muller, 1776) were analyzed (VARELLA-GARCIA et al., 1989). Additional chromosomal investigations of these taxa should better resolve their phylogenetic relationships.

This paper describes the karyotypes and the localization of constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) for L. cinereus and L. ega.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The specimens of L. cinereus (DZSJRP16616, DZSJRP16645) and L. ega (DZSJRP16611, DZSJRP16644) analyzed were captured in São José do Rio Preto (20º 48'S, 49º 24'W), São Paulo state, Brazil and are deposited in the Coleção de Chiroptera do IBILCE/UNESP, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. Mitotic chromosome spreads were prepared after the customary colchicine arresting and hypotonic (1% sodium citrate) and fixation (methanol-acetic 3:1) treatments of fibroblast-like cells obtained from lung biopsies. Cultures were grown in Ham F-10 medium supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine, penicilin, and streptomycin. CBG-banding and Ag-NOR staining were performed according to SUMNER (1972) and HOWELL & BLACK (1980) with the modifications referred to by VARELLA-GARCIA & TADDEI (1989).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Lasiurus cinereus and L. ega presented a similar karyotype with a diploid and fundamental number of 28 and 48 respectively (fig. 1A, C).

 




 

The autosomes are composed of 10 pairs of chromosomes meta and submetacentric, ranging from large to medium (1-10); one pair of small subtelocentric (12) and two pairs of small acrocentric (11 and 13). Despite the similar morphology of the autosomes, the X of L. ega is a medium subtelocentric chromosome and the X of L. cinereus is a medium submetacentric chromosome. These results were similar to those observed in the literature for these two species (BAKER et al., 1971; BICKHMAN, 1979, 1987).

An interesting aspect is that one specimen of L. cinereus was chromosomally heteromorphic in size. In the chromosome pair with the secondary constriction (the smallest acrocentric) a conspicuous short arm was observed in one of the homologous (fig. 1A, inset). The secondary constrictions of the heteromorphic chromosomes were observed to carry the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs), which are described for the first time for this species (fig. 1A, inset). In L. ega, one secondary constriction was observed in the short arm of the lesser acrocentric autosome and these regions carried the NORs in L. ega (fig. 1C, inset).

The C-banding technique revealed the presence of heterochromatin only in the centromeric regions in the autosomes in both species, but with differences in the size of the heterochromatic blocks (fig. 1B, D). The heteromorphism in the size of small acrocentric autosomes in L. cinereus, uncommon in bats, was due to addition of heterochromatin in the small short arm. Unlike of the X chromosome in L. cinereus, which presents only centromeric heterochromatin, the short arm of the subtelocentric X chromosome in L. ega is all heterochromatic. The heterochromatin present in the short arm of the acrocentric of L. cinereus, could have been resulted of the change occurred between autosome heterochromatic regions during the cell events causing the heteromorphism from that individual.

Studies of both banded and standard karyotypes reveal that chromosomal variation is widespread at the generic level in vespertilionid and most of the variation is due to Robertsonian fusions and fissions (BICKHAM, 1979). Despite this, variation at lower taxonomic level is uncommon in these bats. The only case of intraspecifical chromosomal variation in vespertilionid was observed in the Rhogeessa tumida-parvula complex, which presents five cytotypes. A heteromorphic condition was not observed in the analyzed individuals, and the heterochromatin does not account for the observed chromosomal variation (BICKHAM & BAKER, 1977).

Generally the species of the family Vespertilionidae present conservative karyotypes, at least at the genus level. In species belonging to the same genus or a group of related genera the diploid and fundamental number are generally equal, or the fundamental number is the same, while there is a slight difference in the diploid number. Similarly to other genera of Vespertilionid, Lasiurus also presents a high level of conservation (BICKHAM, 1979, 1987). The karyotypes of Lasiurus have been interpreted as the most specialized among the Vespertilionidae, due to the reduction in their chromosomal number. Karyotypes similar to those observed in species of Myotis Kaup, 1829 (2n=44), Eptesicus Rafinesque, 1820 and Histiotus Gervais, 1856 (2n=50) have been interpreted as representing a primitive condition, and karyotypes with a lower diploid number, as observed in Lasiurus, could represent a derived state (BICKHAM, 1979). The condition observed in Lasiurus could have resulted from events such as pericentric inversions and Robertsonian translocations (fusions).

Despite that few differences have been observed among the karyotypes of different species of Lasiurus, the results of the present study suggest that events such as small inversions and variation in the quantity and localization of heterochromatin have played an important role in the evolution of the Lasiurus species. Generally the heterochromatin in bat chromosomes is limited to the centromeric regions. When large variation in quantity and location has been observed, it is related to species differentiation. This was observed in chromosomes of Molossidae and Phyllostomidae species (MORIELLE-VERSUTE et al., 1996; FINATO et al., 2000; FARIA & MORIELLE-VERSUTE, 2002). More cytogenetic information is needed in order to understand the karyotype evolution within the Lasiurus genera and the Vespertilionidae family and to interpret the relationships with other Chiroptera families.

Acknowledgments. To Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP-00/06726-3) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for financial support.

 

REFERENCES

BAKER, R. J.; MOLLHAGEM, T. & LOPEZ, G. 1971. Notes on Lasiurus ega. Journal of Mammalogy, Baltimore, 52:849-852.        [ Links ]

BICKHAM, J. W. 1979. Chromosomal variation and evolutionary relationships of vespertilionid bats. Journal of Mammalogy, Baltimore, 60:350-363.        [ Links ]

__. 1987. Chromosomal variation among seven species of Lasiurine bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy, Baltimore, 68:837-842.        [ Links ]

BICKHAM, J. W. & BAKER, R. J. 1977. Implications of chromosomal variation in Rhogeessa (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy, Baltimore, 58:448-453.        [ Links ]

BUSH, G. L.; CASE, S. M. et al. 1977. Rapid selection and chromosomal evolution in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Washington, 74:3942-3946.        [ Links ]

FARIA, K. C. & MORIELLE-VERSUTE, E. 2002. In situ hybridization of bat chromosomes with human (TTAGGG)n probe, after previous digestion with AluI. Genetic and Molecular Biology, São Paulo, 25(4):365-371.        [ Links ]

FINATO, A. O.; VARELLA-GARCIA, M. et al. 2000. Intrachromosomal distribution of telomeric repeats in Eumops glaucinus and Eumops perotis (Molossidae, Chiroptera). Chromosome Research, Oxford, 8:563-569.        [ Links ]

FREITAS, T. R. O.; BOGO, M. R. & CHRISTOFF, A. U. 1992. G-, C-bands and NORs studies in two species of bats from Southern Brazil (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae, Molossidae). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, Berlin, 57:330-334.        [ Links ]

HALL, E. R. & JONES, J. K., JR. 1961. North American Yellow bats, "Dasypterus" and a list of the named kinds of the genus Lasiurus Gray. University of Kansas Publications of the Museum of Natural History, Lawrence, 14:73-98.        [ Links ]

HOWELL, W. M. & BLACK, A. D. 1980. Controlled silver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia, Basel, 36:1014-1015.        [ Links ]

MORALES, J. C. & BICKHAM, J. W. 1995. Molecular systematics of the genus Lasiurus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) based on restriction-site maps of the mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Journal of Mammalogy, Baltimore, 76:730-749.        [ Links ]

MORIELLE-VERSUTE, E.; VARELLA-GARCIA, M. & TADDEI,V. A. 1996. Karyotypic patterns of seven species of molossid bats (Molossidae, Chiroptera). Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, Basel, 72:26-33.        [ Links ]

NOWAK, R. M. 1999. Chiroptera: bats. In: Walker's mammals of the world. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press. v.1, p.253-489.        [ Links ]

QUMSIYEH, M. B. 1994. Evolution of number and morphology of mammalian chromosomes. Journal of Heredity, Washington, 85:455-465.        [ Links ]

SIMMONS, N. B. & GEISLER, J. H. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archeonycteris, Hassianycteris and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages, with comments on the evolution of echolocation and foraging strategies in Microchiroptera. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, New York, 235: 1-182.        [ Links ]

STOCK, A. T. 1983. Chromosomal homologies and phylogenetic relationships of the vespertilionid bat genera Euderma, Idionycteres and Plecotus. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, Basel, 35:136-140.        [ Links ]

SUMNER, A. T. 1972. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterocromatin. Experimental Cell Research, New York, 75:304-306.        [ Links ]

VARELLA-GARCIA, M. & TADDEI, V.A. 1989. Citogenética de quirópteros: métodos e aplicações. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 6:297-323.         [ Links ]VARELLA-GARCIA, M.; MORIELLE-VERSUTE, E. & TADDEI, V. A. 1989. A survey of cytogenetic data on Brazilian bats. Revista Brasileira de Genética, São Paulo, 12:761-793.        [ Links ]

VOLLETH, M. & HELLER, K-G. 1994a. Karyosystematics of plecotine bats: a reevaluation of chromosomal data. Journal of Mammalogy, Baltimore, 75:416-419.        [ Links ]

__. 1994b. Phylogenetic relationships of vespertilionid genera (Mammalia: Chiroptera) as revealed by karyological analysis. Zeitschrift fur Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, Berlin, 32:11-34.        [ Links ]

VOLLETH, M. & TIDEMANN, C. R. 1989. Chromosome studies in three genera of Australian vespertilionid bats and their systematic implications. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, Berlin, 54:215-222.        [ Links ]

WILSON, A. C.; BUSH, G. L. et al. 1975. Social structuring of mammalian populations and rate of chromosomal evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Washington, 72:5061-5065.        [ Links ]

 

 

Recebido em abril de 2004. Aceito em dezembro de 2004.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License