SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.94 suppl.1The reservosome of Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes: an organelle of the endocytic pathway with a role on metacyclogenesisTrypanosoma cruzi-cardiomyocytes: new contributions regarding a better understanding of this interaction author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Print version ISSN 0074-0276

Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz vol.94  s.1 Rio de Janeiro Sept. 1999

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02761999000700016 

Internalization of Components of the Host Cell Plasma Membrane During Infection by Trypanosoma cruzi

Suppl. I: 143-147

TMU Carvalho+, W De Souza, ES Coimbra

Laboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Hertha Meyer, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21944-970 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil *Laboratório de Biologia Celular e Tecidual, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos, RJ, Brasil

Epimastigote and trypomastigote forms of Trypanosoma cruzi attach to the macrophage surface and are internalized with the formation of a membrane bounded vacuole, known as the parasitophorous vacuole (PV). In order to determine if components of the host cell membrane are internalized during formation of the PV we labeled the macrophage surface with fluorescent probes for proteins, lipids and sialic acid residues and then allowed the labeled cells to interact with the parasites. The interaction process was interrupted after 1 hr at 37ºC and the distribution of the probes analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. During attachment of the parasites to the macrophage surface an intense labeling of the attachment regions was observed. Subsequently labeling of the membrane lining the parasitophorous vacuole containing epimastigote and trypomastigote forms was seen. Labeling was not uniform, with regions of intense and light or no labeling. The results obtained show that host cell membrane lipids, proteins and sialoglycoconjugates contribute to the formation of the membrane lining the PV containing epimastigote and trypomastigote T. cruzi forms. Lysosomes of the host cell may participate in the process of PV membrane formation.

Key words: Trypanosoma cruzi macrophage-parasite interaction - parasitophorous vacuole - fluorescence microscopy

linha2.jpg (2100 bytes)

Trypanosoma cruzi is a parasite which causes Chagas disease in humans, a prominent health problem in Latin America (Dias 1934, Tanowitz et al. 1992). As an obligate intracellular pathogen that infects a wide variety of nucleated cells, the parasite gains access to the host cell and is initially found inside an endocytic vacuole. After 2 hr it disrupts the membrane lining the vacuole and begins to transform into the amastigote form which is able to divide. Subsequently, amastigotes transform back into trypomastigotes and after rupture of the host cell the parasites are released into the intercellular space infecting neighbouring cells or reaching the bloodstream from where they can infect new cells in various tissues or can be ingested by the insect vector and complete the life cycle (Brener 1973, De Souza 1984).

Host cell entry by protozoa involves the formation of a membrane-bounded parasitophorus vacuole (PV). In the case of T. cruzi evidences exist that in phagocytic and non phagocytic host cells lysosomes fuse with the PV (Milder & Kloetzel 1980, Carvalho & De Souza 1989). However, only trypomastigote forms are able to disrupt the membrane lining the vacuole while epimastigotes are destroyed within the PV (Nogueira & Cohn 1976, Carvalho & De Souza 1989, Andrews et al. 1990).

There are very few studies on the biogenesis of the PV of phagocytic and non professional phagocytic host cells infected by T. cruzi. Cytochemical studies showed that plasma membrane enzymes such as Na+-K+-ATPase, Mg+2-ATPase, 5'-nucleotidase and adenylyl cyclase (Meirelles & De Souza 1896) and anionic sites detected using cationized ferritin particles (Meirelles et al. 1984) are not internalized during ingestion of T. cruzi by macrophages. However, concanavalin A-binding sites are internalized and found in the luminal face of the PV membrane (Meirelles et al. 1983). Hall et al. (1991) demonstrated by immunofluorescence and intracellular radioiodination that the membrane lining the endocytic vacuole containing T. cruzi differs depending on the developmental stages of the parasite.

One approach to analyse the participation of components of the host cell plasma membrane in the biogenesis of the PV is to label the host cell membrane before interaction and to follow the fate of the labeled probes during the interaction process. In the present communication we will review the use of non permeant fluorescent probes to label lipids, proteins and sialoglycoconjugates and follow their fate, during interaction of epimastigote and trypomastigote forms of T. cruzi with macrophages as well as, the participation of host cell lysosomes during PV formation.

linha2.jpg (2100 bytes)

bul1.gif (879 bytes)  FORMATION OF THE PARASITOPHOROUS VACUOLE

bul1.gif (879 bytes)  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

bul1.gif (879 bytes)  REFERENCES

linha2.jpg (2100 bytes)

bul1.gif (879 bytes)  FORMATION OF THE PARASITOPHOROUS VACUOLE

Macrophages can ingest and kill invading microorganisms using microbicidal mechanisms that are activated once they attach to the cell surface and that exist within a parasitophorous vacuole formed by fusing of a phagosome with lysosomes (Sadick 1992). However, the infective trypomas-tigote forms of T. cruzi is able to disrupt the membrane lining the PV and replicate as amastigotes in the cytosol (Nogueira & Cohn, 1976, Carvalho & De Souza 1989). In contrast, the epimastigote form is killed and degraded within the vacuole, so it is of interest to study the origin and composition of the PV membrane containing the different stages of T. cruzi.

DTAF forms covalent bonds with surface-exposed membrane proteins and consequently labels the cell surface (Edidin 1989). The cells were washed once with PBS, pH 7.2, and with PBS/200 mM borate, pH 8.5, at a 1:1 proportion. After that the cells were incubated with DTAF (0.5 mg/ml) in the dark for 15 min at 4ºC. Then cells were washed once in PBS + 20% FCS for 5 min at 4ºC, washed in PBS once and incubated in 199 medium. Subsequentley unlabeled parasites were put to interact with those labeled cells (10:1 parasite-host cell ratio) for 1 hr at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The cells were then washed twice with PBS to remove non aderent and extracellular parasites, fixed in 4% freshly prepared formaldehyde solution in 0.1M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, mounted and analyzed by CLSM. Initially an intense labeling at the region of attachment of the parasites to the macrophage surface was observed. In parasites inside the host cell we observed the labeling of the membrane lining the parasitophorous vacuole (Fig. 1a,b). As with PKH26, the labeling of the PV was not uniform. We also observed labeling of small vesicles of the host cell.

PKH-26, a non-permeant fluorescent lipophilic probe that binds to cellular membrane, has been used to label several types of cells (Samlowski et al. 1991, Ward et al. 1993). Macrophages were washed three times in PBS and incubated with PKH26 (100 µg/ml) in PBS for 30 s at 4ºC. Then 500 µl of fetal calf serum (FCS) was added. The cells were washed twice with PBS and put to interact with non labeled parasites (10:1 parasite-host cell ratio) for 1 hr at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After this the cells were washed twice with PBS to remove those parasites that were not strongly adered to the host cell, and processed as described for DTAF. During attachment of the parasites to the macrophage membrane we observed an intense labeling. In parasites inside macrophages we observed labeling of the membrane lining the parasitophorous vacuole containing epimastigote and trypomastigote forms (Fig.1 c, d). However, this membrane labeling was not uniform. Some points showed an intense labeling, while in others no labeling was observed. Some small endocytic vesicles of the host cell was also labeled. Our present observations show clearly that lipids and proteins of the plasma membrane of macrophages are internalized during the process of cell infection by T. cruzi. It is important to point out that the probes used did not bind to any specific membrane macromolecule. There are cytochemical evidence that plasma membrane enzymes are excluded from the membrane lining the PV (Meirelles & De Souza 1986), thus suggesting the existence of mechanisms to select which membrane components are internalized. We did not observe differences in the behaviour of the probes when epimastigote or trypomastigote forms were used.

Recent reports (Ward et al. 1993, Pouvelle et al. 1994, Lingelbach & Joiner 1998), have shown that erythrocyte membrane lipids, but not proteins, are incorporated into the PV containing Plasmodium. In the case of T. gondii both proteins and lipids are internalized during formation of the PV (Pacheco-Soares & De Souza 1998, Lingenlbach & Joiner 1998). Both probes described have been used to label the surface before interaction and to follow their fate during formation of the PV containing Plasmodium and Toxoplasma (Ward et al. 1993, Pacheco-Soares & De Souza 1998, Lingelbach & Joiner 1998). Our observations showed an initial concentration of the labeled probes at the site of parasite attachment and their subsequent incorporation, together with the parasites, concentrating in the membrane lining the PV. Using the same approach it was shown previously that when tachyzoites of T. gondii attach to the host cell surface transfer of the probe to the parasite surface took place (Pacheco-Soares & De Souza 1998). This phenomenon was not observed with T. cruzi.

Several studies have shown that glycoconju-gates located on the surface of T. cruzi or the macrophage are involved on the process of parasite-host cell interaction (Meirelles et al. 1983, Araujo-Jorge & De Souza 1984, 1986). Special emphasis has been given to the role played by sialoglycoconjugates due to the influence of sialic acid residues on the interaction process (Meirelles et al. 1984, Vermelho & Meirelles 1994). It has been shown that cells containing few or no residues of sialic acids, either due to removal of the residues by neuraminidase treatment (Araújo-Jorge & de Souza 1984), blockage of the residues using lectins (Araújo-Jorge & De Souza 1986) or their absence due to mutation (Ciavaglia et al. 1993) are much less infected by T. cruzi than control cells. In addition, experiments carried out in CHO cells deficient in the glycosilation process showed that T. cruzi disrupts faster the PV membrane of these cells as compared with control cells (Hall et al. 1992). Based on those information we decided to analyze the fate of sialoglycoconjugates during the T. cruzi-macrophage interaction process. For this we used Fluorescein-5-thiosemicarbazide (Ward et al. 1993) as a probe for labeling of surface-exposed sialoglycoconjugates of macrophages. The cells were washed in PBS twice and incubated in a freshly prepared solution of sodium m-periodate (5 mM in PBS) for 30 min at 4ºC. The cells were then washed three times with PBS at 4ºC and incubated in PBS containing 0.66 mg/ml of fluorescein-5-thiosemicarbazide for 30 min at 4ºC, washed with 199 medium twice and incubated with unlabeled parasites (10:1 parasite-host cell ratio) for 1 hr at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After that time the cells were washed twice with PBS to remove non adherent and extracellular parasites and processed as described above. As described before for lipids and proteins we observed labeling in the region of adhesion of epimastigote or trypomas-tigote forms of T. cruzi to the macrophage surface and subsequently labeling of the membrane lining the PV (Fig.1 e, f). Previous studies in which the macrophage surface was labeled with cationized ferritin, which binds to anionic sites, showed internalization of these sites and their concentation in endocytic vacuoles but not in the PV (Meirelles et al. 1984). The presence of sialoglycoconjugates in the membrane lining the PV could in some way explain the fact that only after a few hours the membrane is disrupted (Hall et al. 1992). Studies carried out with mutant cells which do not present surface-exposed sialoglyco-conjugates have shown that T. cruzi disrupts the PV membrane faster than in control cells (Hall et al. 1992). In addition it was shown that removal of sialic residues enhances the activity of the parasite hemolysin (Hall et al. 1992).

The participation of lysosomes during formation of the parasitophorous membrane was also analyzed. Some reports showed that after internalization of T. cruzi by macrophages lysosomes fused with phagosomes (Milder & Klotzel 1980, Carvalho & De Souza 1989). We have quantified the process of phagosome lysosome fusion in macrophages (Carvalho & De Souza 1989) observing that fusion occurred only in 41% for trypomastigote and 37% for epimastigote forms after 1 hr of interaction. In non phagocytic cells Tardieux et al. (1992) showed a recruitment of lysosomes in the early step of T. cruzi interaction. So we used macrophages as phagocytic and Vero as non professional phagocytic cells to vizualize this early process of lysosome fusion. We labeled secondary lysosomes of host cells with 1mg/ml of Lucifer Yellow. After 2 hr at 37ºC, the cells were washed twice in 199 medium, and incubated again for 30 min at 37ºC. The labeled cells were put to interact with the parasite for times varyng from 15 to 60 min. Then the cells were washed with 199 medium, mounted and analyzed by CLSM. In Vero cells we easily observed the concentration of lysosomes at the region of parasite adhesion after 15 min of interaction. This process was not observed in all parasites attached to Vero cells. With macrophages we also observed a concentration of lysosomes at the region of parasite attachment. We could not observe clearly, as in Vero cells, the process of lysosome fusion in this early step of interaction.

In conclusion, our results indicate that the host cell membrane contributes in proteins, lipids and sialoglyoconjugates to the formation of the T. cruzi-containing PV independently if infective trypo-mastigotes or non-infective epimastigotes are used. Mainly in non phagocytic cells, lysosomes participate in the early formation of PV membrane. Further biochemical studies are necessary in order to know in more detail the composition of the membrane lining the PV in order to understand better the evasion strategies used by T. cruzi to disrupt the membrane, a fundamental step for parasite multiplication within the host cell.

 

bul1.gif (879 bytes)  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To Miss Rosemary C Maciel, Márcia Adriana SC Dutra and Ana Carolina S Ribeiro for techinical assistence.

 

bul1.gif (879 bytes)  REFERENCES

  • Araújo-Jorge TC, De Souza W 1984. Effect of carbohydrates, periodate and enzymes in the process of endocytosis of Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop 41: 17-27.         [ Links ]

  • Araújo-Jorge TC, De Souza W 1986. Interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi with macrophages: effect of previous incubation of the parasites or the host cells with lectins. Z Parasintenkd 72: 153-171.         [ Links ]

  • Andrews NW, Abrams CK, Slatin SL, Griffths G 1990. Trypanosoma cruzi-secreted protein immunologically related to the complement C9: evidence for membrane pore-forming activity at low pH. Cell 61:1277-1287.         [ Links ]

  • Brener Z 1973. Biology of Trypanosoma cruzi. Ann Rev Microbiol 27: 347-382.         [ Links ]

  • Carvalho TMU, De SouzaW 1989. Early events related with the behaviour of Trypanosoma cruzi within an endocytic vacuole in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Cell Struct Funct 14: 383-392.         [ Links ]

  • Ciavaglia M, Carvalho TMU, De Souza W 1993. Interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi with cells with altered glycosylation patterns. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 193: 718-721.         [ Links ]

  • De Souza W 1984. Cell biology of Trypanosoma cruzi. Int Rev Cytol 86: 197-283.         [ Links ]

  • Dias E 1934. Estudos sobre o Schizotrypanum cruzi. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 28: 1-110         [ Links ]

  • Edidin M 1989. Fluorescent labelling of cell surfaces, p. 87-102. In Methods in Cell Biology, Academic Press.         [ Links ]

  • Hall BF, Webster PM, Joiner KA, Andrews NW 1992. Desialylation of lysosomal membrane glycoproteins by Trypanosoma cruzi: a role for the surface neuraminidase in facilitating parasite entry into host cells. J Exp Med 176: 313-325.         [ Links ]

  • Hall FB, Furtado GC, Joiner K 1991. Characterization of host cell-derived membrane proteins of the vacuole surrounding different intracellular forms of Trypanosoma cruzi in J774 cells. J Immunol 147: 4313-4321.         [ Links ]

  • Lingelbach K, Joiner KA 1998. The parasitophorous vacuole membrane surrounding Plasmodium and Toxoplasma: an unusual compartment in infected cells. J Cell Sci 111: 1467-1475.         [ Links ]

  • Meirelles MNL, De Souza W 1985. Killing of Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania mexicana and survival of Toxoplasma gondii, in chicken macrophages in vitro. J Submicroscop Cytol 17: 327-334.         [ Links ]

  • Meirelles MNL, De Souza W 1986. The fate of plasma membrane macrophage enzyme markers during endocytosis of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Submicroscop Cytol 18: 99-107.         [ Links ]

  • Meirelles MNL, Martinez-Palomo A, Souto-Padrón T, De Souza W 1983. Participation of Concanavalin A binding sites in the interaction between Trypanosoma cruzi and macrophages. J Cell Sci 62: 287-299.         [ Links ]

  • Meirelles MNL, Souto-Padrón T, De Souza W 1984. Participation of cell surface anionic sites in the interaction between Trypanosoma cruzi and macrophages. J Submicroscop Cytol 16: 533-545.         [ Links ]

  • Milder R, Kloetzel J 1980. The development of Trypanosoma cruzi in macrophages in vitro. Interaction with lysosomes and host cell fate. Parasitology 80: 139-145.         [ Links ]

  • Nogueira N, Cohn Z 1976. Trypanosoma cruzi mechanism of entry and intracellular fate in mammalian cells. J Exp Med 143: 1402-1420.         [ Links ]

  • Pacheco-Soares C, De Souza W 1998. Redistribution of parasite and host cell membrane components during Toxoplasma gondii invasion. Cell Struct Funct 23: 159-168.         [ Links ]

  • Pouvele B, Gormley J, Taraschi T 1994. Characterization of trafficking pathways and membrane genesis in malaria-infected erytrocytes. Mol Bioch Parasitol 66: 83-96.         [ Links ]

  • Sadick MD 1992. Macrophages in parasitic infection, p. 267-284 In CE Lewis & JOD Mc Gee (eds), The Macrophage, IRL Press.         [ Links ]

  • Samlowski ES, Robertson BA, Draper BR, Prystas E, Mc Gregor IR 1991. Effects of supravital fluorochromes used to analyze the in vivo homing of murine lymphocytes on cellular function. J Immunol Meth 144: 101-115.         [ Links ]

  • Tanowitz HB, Kirchhoff LV, Simon D, Morris SA, Weis LM, Wittner M 1992. Chagas disease. Clinical Microbiol Rev 5: 400-419.         [ Links ]

  • Tardieux I, Webster P, Ravesloot J, Boron WJ, Lunn A, Heuser JE, Andrews NA 1992. Lysosome recruitment and fusion are events required for trypanosoma invasion of mammalian cells. Cell 71: 1117-1130.         [ Links ]

  • Vermelho AB, Meirelles MNL 1994. Sialoglycoconju-gates in Trypanosoma cruzi- host cell interaction: Possible biological model - a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 89: 69-79.         [ Links ]

  • Ward GE, Miller LH, Dvorak JA 1993. The origin of parasitophorous vacuole membrane lipids in malaria-infected erythrocytes. J Cell Sci 106: 237-248.         [ Links ]

  • This work was supported by Programa de Núcleos de Excelência (Pronex), Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação Estadual do Norte Fluminense (Fenorte).

linha2.jpg (2100 bytes)

Figure

linha2.jpg (2100 bytes)

+Corresponding author. Fax: +55-21- 260.2364. E-mail: tecia@leao.biof.ufrj.br  

Received 9 June 1999

Accepted 9 August 1999