Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Worm burdens in outbred and inbred laboratory rats with morphometric data on Syphacia muris (Yamaguti, 1935) Yamaguti, 1941 (Nematoda, Oxyuroidea)

Abstract

Syphacia muris worm burdens were evaluated in the rat Rattus norvegicus of the strains Wistar (outbred), Low/M and AM/2/Torr (inbred), maintained conventionally in institutional animal houses in Brazil. Morphometrics and illustration data for S. muris recovered from Brazilian laboratory rats are provided for the first time since its proposition in 1935.

Syphacia muris; prevalence; morphometrics; laboratory rats; Brazil


Worm Burdens in Outbred and Inbred Laboratory Rats with Morphometric Data on Syphacia muris (Yamaguti, 1935) Yamaguti, 1941 (Nematoda, Oxyuroidea)

Vol. 96(1): 133-136, January, 2001

Roberto Magalhães Pinto/ + + Corresponding author. Fax: +55-21-260.4866. E-mail: rmpinto@gene.dbbm.fiocruz.br *Research Fellow CNPq (proc. no. 300.374/80-1, 141.175/97-1, 303.124/89-0, respectively) Received 12 May 2000 Accepted 5 September 2000 / * + Corresponding author. Fax: +55-21-260.4866. E-mail: rmpinto@gene.dbbm.fiocruz.br *Research Fellow CNPq (proc. no. 300.374/80-1, 141.175/97-1, 303.124/89-0, respectively) Received 12 May 2000 Accepted 5 September 2000 , Lucineide Gonçalves * + Corresponding author. Fax: +55-21-260.4866. E-mail: rmpinto@gene.dbbm.fiocruz.br *Research Fellow CNPq (proc. no. 300.374/80-1, 141.175/97-1, 303.124/89-0, respectively) Received 12 May 2000 Accepted 5 September 2000 , Dely Noronha, Delir Corrêa Gomes * + Corresponding author. Fax: +55-21-260.4866. E-mail: rmpinto@gene.dbbm.fiocruz.br *Research Fellow CNPq (proc. no. 300.374/80-1, 141.175/97-1, 303.124/89-0, respectively) Received 12 May 2000 Accepted 5 September 2000

Laboratório de Helmintos Parasitos de Vertebrados, Departamento de Helmintologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, 21045-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

Syphacia muris worm burdens were evaluated in the rat Rattus norvegicus of the strains Wistar (outbred), Low/M and AM/2/Torr (inbred), maintained conventionally in institutional animal houses in Brazil. Morphometrics and illustration data for S. muris recovered from Brazilian laboratory rats are provided for the first time since its proposition in 1935.

Key words: Syphacia muris - prevalence - morphometrics - laboratory rats - Brazil

Efforts have been made worldwide in order to detect, identify and study ecto and endoparasites of laboratory animals, aiming at the achievement of proper procedures regarding the control or eradication of parasitism, considering the important role these animals play in scientific research. In this scope, worm burdens in mice and rats have been analyzed, compared and regarded as essential targets of investigation (Eaton 1972, Kamiya at al. 1979, Scott & Gibbs 1986, Cheng & Xinmei 1990).

In Brazil, complete reports related to helminths parasitizing outbred and inbred laboratory mice are those of Pinto et al. (1994), when parasites were identified, described, illustrated, worm burden quantified and prevalences established for Swiss Webster, C57Bl/6 and DBA/2 strains, with a further proposition of an adaptation of the anal swab technique for the detection of oxyurid infections in C57Bl/6, C57Bl/10, CBA, BALB/c, DBA/2 and C3H/He mice (Gonçalves et al. 1998).

The present approach adds new information to these previous studies and is related to the comparison of worm burdens in laboratory rats from institutional animal houses as well presents the first morphometric data on Syphacia muris (Yamaguti, 1935) Yamaguti, 1941, obtained from Brazilian hosts.

Thirty adult male rats (Rattus norvegicus Berkenhout, 1769) of different strains (10 Wistar, 10 Low M/2 and 10 AM/2/Torr) were obtained from two institutional animal houses in Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, not named for ethical reasons. Weights of rats were: 360-560g (Wistar), 215-280g (Low M/2) and 175-287g (AM/2/Torr). Samples were randomly obtained and animals were properly sacrificed in an ether chamber and necropsied according to established procedures (Apa 1989). Parasites were recovered in a 0.85% NaCl solution and fixed in hot 10% formaldehyde. Worm burdens were evaluated and quantified under an Olympus stereoscope microscope. Worms were then dehydrated in an ethanol series (70o-100o GL), cleared in phenol and preserved either as whole mounts in a 1:1 solution of Canada balsam and beechwood creosote or as wet material. Preparation of en face mounts is in accord to Anderson (1958). Parasites were examined in a brightfield Olympus microscope and micrographs were obtained in a Zeiss Axiophot system. Measurements are in micrometers (µm) unless otherwise indicated and means are in parentheses. Studied specimens were deposited in the Helminthological Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute (CHIOC).

Rats of the different strains were parasitized with S. muris, widely distributed and a very common nematode species to occur in these hosts. Nevertheless, morphometric data on specimens recovered from laboratory animals in Brazil are still unavailable.

Syphacia muris (Yamaguti, 1935)

Yamaguti, 1941

( Figs 1-5)


Figures 1-5

Redescription

Morphometrics based on five adult males and five adult females. Oxyuroidea, Oxyuridae, Syphaciinae. Small, thick worms, white when alive. Cephalic inflations conspicuous. Great sexual dimorphism.

Males: body 1.0-1.1 (1.02) mm long, 60-100 (76) wide, with three prominent mamelons on the ventral surface of posterior portion; distance between mamelons, 70-75 (71). Mouth with three lips. The two subventral contain a papilliform structure each, not projecting beyond the cuticule, while the dorsal presents two similar structures, one on either side. Esophagus, with bulb, 140-160 (148) long; bulb globular 40-50 (48) in diameter. Nerve ring 90-105 (96) from anterior end. Excretory pore not observed. Single spicule 50-56 (52) long. Gubernaculum 20-30 (22) long, with a hook-shaped distal process. Three pairs of caudal papillae. Cloacal aperture 340-360 (348) from posterior extremity. Caudal appendage 100-130 (118) long.

Females: body 2.5-2.8 (2.74) mm long, 170-200 (190) wide. Mouth as referred for the males. Esophagus, with bulb, 190-210 (202) long. Bulb globular 40-80 (72) x 50-80 (72) in diameter. Nerve ring and excretory pore 100 and 400-550 (460) from anterior end, respectively. Vulva 720-750 (730) from anterior extremity. Eggs 60-72 (69) long by 28-32 (29) wide. Anus 340-360 (350) from posterior end.

Taxonomic summary

Host: Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhout, 1769)

Site of infection: large intestine

Locality: Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Deposit of specimens: CHIOC no. 34207 a-k (whole mounts), 33895 (wet material)

Results so far obtained show that the total of recovered worms in AM/2/Torr rats is of 4,344 S. muris, with a minimum of 172, a maximum of 1,093 and a mean of 434.4 worms/animal. In Low/M rats, the total corresponds to 2,694 worms, with a minimum of 149, a maximum of 494 and a mean of 269.4 worms/animal. Specimens of Wistar strain presented a total of 1,309 worms, with a minimum of 28, a maximum of 308 and a mean of 130.9 worms/animal (Table).

Table

Syphacia muris, the common pinworm of rats, was proposed by Yamaguti (1935) as Enterobius muris recovered from R. norvegicus var. albus Fitzinger in Kioto, Japan, based on female specimens and was compared with Enterobius vermicularis Leach, 1853, considering their similarities.

Later, during investigations related to the helminth fauna of Japanese mammals, Yamaguti (1941) described the males of the species proposed in 1935 and changed the original allocation of E. muris to the genus Syphacia Seurat, 1916 in a new combination presently accepted.

Although its worldwide distribution, S. muris has never been redescribed and illustrated on basis of specimens recovered from Brazilian hosts, since its proposition. Vicente et al. (1997) in a survey of nematodes parasitizing mammals in Brazil, reproduce data on S. muris after Yamaguti (1935). In fact, few are the morphometric data on this species, considering that most papers refer either to its reaction to drugs or prevalence (Weiss & Ernst 1981, Bressan et al. 1997).

Previous results on the prevalence of S. muris in laboratory and wild rats show that worm burdens have been considered and the zoonotic importance of S. muris emphasized taking into account that it may accidentaly infect man by contamination of food with faeces of infected murine hosts (Jueco & Zabala 1990).

Another approach reports to the use of oxyurid nematodes of rats and mice as test organisms in chemotherapeutic studies on enterobiasis when loads of S. muris in rats were compared to those of Syphacia obvelata (Rudolphi, 1802) Seurat, 1916 in mice and figures of both parasites provided (Hussey 1957). Quentin (1971) redescribing and illustrating species of Syphacia Seurat, 1916, during a report on the comparative morphology of the cephalic and genital structures observed in this group, refers to S. muris from rats in France.

Specimens of S. muris recovered from Brazilian rats of the different strains do not present significant differences and data obtained confirm the results of Yamaguti (1935, 1941) and Quentin (1971).

Prevalences of ecto and endoparasites in mice and rats from animal houses were previously evaluated in Brazil (Pinto et al. 1994, Bressan et al. 1997). Nevertheless, Bressan et al. (1997) do not report to any particular strain and only refer to rats and mice as originated from conventional breeding colonies. Animals were investigated for the frequency of helminth eggs with the employment of the method of Willis and anal swab examination. With these techniques, 32 and 61.7% of the rats, respectively, were positive for Syphacia sp. eggs. Necropsies were further performed and based on presented data, an overall prevalence of 71.8% was calculated (present paper) for rats infected with Syphacia sp. worms. Syphaciinae nematodes recovered from mice and rats were not identified to the specific level and authors refer to Syphacia sp. occurring in both hosts either reporting to the prevalences of infection or to positive animals regarding to necropsy and fecal examination, when mice and rats were totalized together and referred to as "positive animals". Therefore, we suppose that the species should be related to S. muris parasitizing rats and S. obvelata infecting mice. Thus, further comparison of the present results with those obtained by Bressan et al. (1997) is unavailable and this fact reinforces the importance of a proper identification of the parasites, whenever they are under investigation.

To the institutions which supplied the rats, to the Setor de Multimeios e Laboratório de Produção e Processamento de Imagens, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, for technical assistance regarding figures.

Fig. | Table

The authors dedicate this paper in honour of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute in the occasion of the centenary of its foundation, May 25th, 2000.

  • Anderson RC 1958. Méthod pour l'examen des nématodes en vue apicale. Ann Par 33: 171-172.
  • Apa 1989. Código de Ética Experimental com Animais, Sozed, Rio de Janeiro, 8 pp.
  • Bressan MCRV, Calgaro GA, Alexandre SR, Marques T 1997. Prevalence of ecto and endoparasites in mice and rats reared in animal houses. Braz J vet Res anim Sci 34: 142-146.
  • Cheng G, Xinmei Q 1990. Observation on intestinal parasites of laboratory mice. J Shangai Agr Coll 8: 125-130.
  • Eaton GD 1972. Intestinal helminths in inbred strains of mice. Lab Animal Sci 22: 850-853.
  • Gonçalves L, Pinto RM, Vicente JJ, Noronha D, Gomes DC 1998. Helminth parasites of conventionally maintained laboratory mice. II. Inbred strains with an adaptation of the anal swab technique. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 93: 121-126.
  • Hussey KL 1957. Syphacia muris vs. Syphacia obvelata in laboratory rats and mice. J Parasitol 43: 555-559.
  • Jueco NL, Zabala ZR 1990. The nematodes of Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus mindanensis Phil Vet Med 27: 39-46.
  • Kamiya M, Oku Y, Itoh T, Kagiyama N, Iwai H 1979. Parasitological survey on four barrier-sustained mouse and rat colonies. Exp Anim 28: 409-413.
  • Pinto RM, Vicente JJ, Noronha D, Gonçalves L, Gomes DC 1994. Helminth parasites of conventionally maintained laboratory mice. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 89: 33-40.
  • Quentin JC 1971. Morphologie comparée des structures céphaliques et génitales des oxyures du genre Syphacia Ann Parasitol 46: 15-60.
  • Scott ME, Gibbs HC 1986. Long-term population dynamics of pinworms (Syphacia obvelata and Aspiculuris tetraptera) in mice. J Parasitol 72: 652-662.
  • Vicente JJ, Rodrigues HO, Gomes DC, Pinto RM 1997. Nematóides do Brasil. Parte V: nematóides de mamíferos. Revta bras Zool (Supl.1): 1-452.
  • Weiss J, Ernst A 1981. Zur Bekämpfung der Oxyuriasis bei der Laborratte. Z Versuchstierk 23: 337-342.
  • Yamaguti S 1935. Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 13. Mammalian nematodes. Japan J Zool 6: 433-457.
  • Yamaguti S 1941. Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 35. Mammalian nematodes, II. Japan J Zool 9: 409-439.
  • +
    Corresponding author. Fax: +55-21-260.4866. E-mail:
    *Research Fellow CNPq (proc. no. 300.374/80-1, 141.175/97-1, 303.124/89-0, respectively)
    Received 12 May 2000
    Accepted 5 September 2000
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      23 Mar 2001
    • Date of issue
      Jan 2001

    History

    • Accepted
      05 Sept 2000
    • Received
      12 May 2000
    Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde Av. Brasil, 4365 - Pavilhão Mourisco, Manguinhos, 21040-900 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel.: (55 21) 2562-1222, Fax: (55 21) 2562 1220 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
    E-mail: memorias@fiocruz.br