The impact of CO₂ on collection of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say by BG-Sentinel(r) traps in Manaus, Brazil

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is an important component for activating and attracting host-seeking mosquitoes. The BG-Sentinel^(r) trap is a well-established monitoring tool for capturing Culicidae, but CO₂ role for the trap effectiveness has not been evaluated in highly urbanised areas. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of BG-Sentinel traps baited with and without CO₂ for capturing urban mosquitoes. Fifteen areas were selected within the city of Manaus, Brazil, where four BG-Sentinels were operated for 24 h, two of them with CO₂ and two without CO₂. Captured Aedes aegypti females were dissected for the determination of their parity status. A significantly higher proportion of traps (from 32-79%) were positive for female Ae. aegypti when using the BG-Sentinel with CO₂ (χ² = 11.0271, p ≤ 0.001). Catches of female Culex spp were six times higher in CO₂ traps (Mann-Whitney U test = 190.5; p = 0.001). Parity rates were similar for both traps. This study showed that CO₂ has primarily an enhancing effect on the efficacy of BG-Sentinel for capturing Culex spp in Manaus. For Ae. aegypti, the positivity rate of the trap was increased, when CO₂ was added.

adult mosquitoes; dry ice; urban area

Detection of chemical cues emitted by vertebrate hosts is important for the host-finding behaviour of mosquitoes. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a known attractant for mosquitoes and fluctuations in the atmospheric concentration of the gas can indicate the presence of a host (Reeves 1990, Dekker et al. 2005). CO₂ also activates the host-seeking behaviour of mosquitoes, including Aedes aegypti (L.) (Eiras & Jepson 1991). CO₂-baited traps have been widely used to increase catch rates of mosquitoes, including for monitoring of Ae. aegypti with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) traps in the United States of America (Service 1992, Canyon & Hii 1997).

In Brazil, the National Dengue Control Program recommends monitoring of Ae. aegypti based on larval surveys (MS/FUNASA 2002). Nevertheless, traps for capturing adult mosquitoes such as the MosquiTRAP^(r) (Gama et al. 2007) and the BG-Sentinel^(r) (Kröckel et al. 2006) have been evaluated as new monitoring technologies for dengue vectors in Brazil.

The Biogents-Sentinel^TM trap (BGS) (Biogents AG, Regensburg, Germany) attracts mosquitoes by visual cues, by the imitation of convection currents of human beings and by olfactory baits which are released through a dispenser [BG-Lure (BGL) ] which is placed inside of the trap (Kröckel et al. 2006). The BGL contains substances that are found on human skin, such as ammonia, lactic acid and caproic acid that also attracts for host seeking females Ae. aegypti (Geier et al. 1999, Bosch et al. 2000).

The BGS has been used for capturing Culicidae, especially Ae. aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex spp (Williams et al. 2006, 2007), including studies with parity rates (Maciel-de-Freitas et al. 2007) and detection of new infestations with mosquitoes (Ritchie et al. 2006). In these studies, BGS traps were used without addition of CO_2, which is cost and labour-intensive, as dry ice is not available everywhere and CO₂ cylinders are heavy to carry. Other suction traps for mosquitoes, such as CDC traps, are routinely used with CO₂ in order to obtain sufficient collections (McNelly 1989). In direct trap comparisons it was shown that BGS traps without CO₂ capture significantly more female Ae. aegypti than CO₂-baited encephalitis vector surveillance traps (Williams et al. 2006) and significantly more female Ae. albopictus than CO₂-baited CDC traps (Meeraus et al. 2008), but the effect of CO₂ on catch rates of BGS traps for urban mosquitoes, mainly Ae. aegypti and Culex spp, has not been investigated in Brazil.

The objective of the present paper is to compare the effectiveness of BGS traps for capturing urban Culicidae, such as Ae. aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus when used with and without CO₂ in an urban area in Brazil. Additionally, the physiological state of female Ae. aegypti was determined.

The study was conducted in 15 urban areas within the neighbourhood Cidade Nova, in the northern region of the city of Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil (3º6′0′′S 60º1′0′′W). Cidade Nova is the most populated neighbourhood of Manaus, with more than 300,000 inhabitants, and was chosen as a study site because of high larvae indices and regular sanitation in most of the houses. All 15 areas were at least 250 m apart from each other and included four-seven quarters with a total of approximately 120 houses.

The BGS traps were supplied with approximately 3 kg of pulverised dry ice (CARBOMAN Ltda, Manaus). Bottles of 5 L PET were adapted for being used as recipients for the dry ice. A hole of 4 mm was drilled in the lid of the bottle and a polyethylene tube of 4 mm diameter and 1 m of length was pulled through. The connection of the tube and the lid was closed air-tight with the help of hot glue. The bottle was isolated with a double layer of bubble foil and placed inside of a 20 L-Styrofoam box. The polyethylene tube was connected to a Biogents-CO₂-nozzle and this nozzle was attached to the end of a mounting pole of the trap (bgsentinel.com/bilder/BGSentinel_Manual_Addition_of_CO2.pdf) (Figure).

A: filled PET-bottle with 3 Kg of dry ice and carbon dioxide (CO₂)-nozzle, surrounded by bubble foil; B: sealed 20L-Styrofoam box with CO₂-nozzle; C: BG-Sentinel(r) trap with CO₂-nozzle (arrow) which is connected by a plastic tube to the dry ice-filled PET-bottle

In each of the 15 areas, four houses were randomly chosen (flipping of a coin) to receive BGS traps with BGL. Two of the four traps per area were additionally baited with CO₂. The traps were installed in the peridomestic area of houses, sheltered from sunlight and rain. All traps were installed in the morning and operated for a 24 h period. Catch bags were identified and sent to the Entomology Department of the Tropical Medicine Foundation of Amazonas (FMT-AM) in Manaus. Three of the 60 traps were excluded from the trial, because inhabitants were absent at the end of the trapping period, or the traps were turned off. Trap catches were performed in January 2009.

Captured mosquitoes were counted and sexed under a stereomicroscope. Aedes were identified to species and other Culicidae were identified to genus with the help of a dichotomic identification key (Consoli & Lourenço-de-Oliveira 1994). Female individuals of Ae. aegypti were dissected and the parity status (parous, nulliparous) was evaluated for females in egg development stage ≤ Christopher's stage II (Detinova 1962, Reiter & Nathan 2001). Females in Christopher's stage >II were documented as "late ovarian development stages".

For Ae. aegypti and Culex mosquitoes, statistical differences between the catches of BGS traps with and without CO₂ were assessed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. For Ae. aegypti, the chi-square test was used to investigate if the proportions of positive catch rates differ between the two trap types. Parity rates were compared by Fisher's exact test. Due to the low Ae. albopictus catch rates, comparisons between traps were not statistically evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software R 2.12.2 (r-project.org) (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010). The Ethical Research Committee (CEP) of studies involving human beings from the FMT-AM approved this project (approbation 1906 - registration CEP 1024-08).

BGS traps (n = 57) collected 2,924 Culicidae, where 2,699 (92.3%) belonged to the genus Culex and 225 (7.7%) to the genus Aedes. Of the 225 Aedes mosquitoes, 197 (88%) were identified as Ae. aegypti and 28 (12%) as Ae. albopictus. BGS traps baited with BGL and CO₂ (n = 29) captured significantly higher mean numbers of female (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.03) and sum of male and female Ae. aegypti (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.04), than traps baited with BGL only (n = 28), but no significant difference was observed for males (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.07) (Table I). For BGS traps without CO₂, nine out of 28 traps (32%) were positive for the presence of female Ae. aegypti and for traps with CO₂, 23 out of 29 traps (79%) were positive (χ² = 11.0271, p ≤ 0.001). Interestingly, BGS traps without CO₂ collected the highest maximum number of female and male Ae. aegypti per 24 h trapping period.

TABLE I
Aedes aegypti and Culex spp [mean ± standard error (SE) ] in BG-Sentinel traps (BGS) baited with BG-Lure (BGL) and with or without carbon dioxide (CO2) in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil

Traps with CO₂ captured six times more female and almost four times more male Culex spp, than traps without CO₂. Significant difference between two different trap configurations was only observed for females (Mann-Whitney U test: Culex females: U = 190.5; p = 0.001; Culex males: U = 302; p = 0.095) (Table I).

Addition of CO₂ slightly increased the catch rates of Ae. aegypti females and males (by 23% and 9%, respectively). The better performance of the traps with CO₂ is more pronounced in the comparison of the proportions of positive trapping periods, which was significantly higher, when CO₂ was used.

Many trap types are routinely used with CO₂ in order to obtain sufficient trapping efficacies. The CDC trap was shown to catch significantly higher numbers of Ae. aegypti in French Polynesia when it was used with CO₂ (Russel 2004).

Although the BGS trap was especially developed for capturing Ae. aegypti, catches of Culex mosquitoes have been reported (Kröckel et al. 2006, Williams et al. 2006). This might be due to the BGS trap's imitation of human odour plumes. In the present study, six times higher number of female Culex spp were captured by the traps that were operated with CO₂. This suggests that this kairomone might be an important attractant for this mosquito genus. Similar results were described before for the CDC trap (Russel 2004). The high catch rates of up to 272 Culex females with CO₂ and up to 57 Culex females without CO₂ (mainly Cx. quinquefasciatus, personal observation of TMF de Ázara) per 24 h shows that the BGS trap might be a useful tool for the monitoring of diseases that are transmitted by the species in urban areas in Brazil, like Oropouche fever or Bancroftian Filariosis. The high catch rates of Culex mosquitoes in both BGS configurations demonstrate that these mosquitoes are predominant in our study area. This information was confirmed by the Foundation of Health Vigilance in Manaus (L Mustafa, unpublished observations).

It is interesting to note that the positive effect of CO₂ on the collection rate of the traps is most pronounced in mosquito species that occur in high densities, less pronounced in mosquito species that occur in low densities. It might be that in urbanised areas with a high density of human hosts and a high background level of atmospheric CO₂, the CO₂ signals from the trap attract mosquitoes only over a short-range distance.

These results may have a practical importance for monitoring programs in urban areas. For instance, for monitoring Ae. aegypti with BGS traps in urban areas, CO₂ is not necessarily required, which minimizes costs and labour. Even if positivity of the BGS trap for Ae. aegypti females was higher when CO₂ was used, the high costs and operational labour of using CO₂ from cylinders or dry ice might not to be worth it. Instead, the number of traps could be increased in order to capture a sufficient number of individuals. As conditions can vary considerably between different geographic areas, we suggest evaluating the traps performance with and without CO₂, before a bigger experiment with BGS traps is being started. For researchers who work with Culex however, it is highly recommendable to add CO₂, if very high catch rates are required.

Dissections were performed with 104 of the 105 captured Ae. aegypti females. The traps with and without CO₂ captured 59 and 45 females, respectively (Table II). The presence of fresh blood was detected in three out of the 27 females in early ovarian development stages that were captured by traps with CO₂ and in eight out of the 17 females in early ovarian development stages that were captured by the traps without CO₂ (Table II). The parous rate [parous/(nulliparous + parous)] of Ae. aegypti was 92.6% and 82.4% for traps with and without CO₂, respectively and 88.6% for all traps together. The proportions of parous and nulliparous females did not differ significantly between the two trap types (Fisher's exact test: p = 0.359).

TABLE II
Physiological status of female Aedes aegypti captured with BG-Sentinel traps (BGS) baited with BG-Lure (BGL) and with or without carbon dioxide (CO₂) in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil

Theoretically, the BGS with BGL should be especially attractive for host-seeking female mosquitoes. Maciel-de-Freitas et al. (2006) found the highest percentage of recaptured individuals in to be in initial stages of ovarian development, what reflects that these females were host seeking. In contrast to this, we found almost 60% of Ae. aegypti females collected to be in ovarian development stages > II, what means that this females have taken a blood meal recently and are developing a batch of eggs. Morais (2009) found similar results in field studies conducted in the urban area of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, where 71% of female Ae. aegypti captured with BGS traps were gravid. As Ae. aegypti is known to take more than one blood meal during a single gonotrophic cycle (Barata et al. 2001), our observation could indicate that some of the females were seeking for a host or that the BGS traps are not only attractive for host-seeking mosquitoes. The visual cue of the black funnel for example could be attractive to gravid females looking for oviposition sites. The observation that 88.6% of the Ae. aegypti females were parous could reflect high survival rates in Manaus and thus a high transmission risk of dengue viruses.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To Maria das Graças Vale Barbosa and the students of the FMT-AM, for the processing of the field material, to Luzia Mustafa and the field workers from the FVS-AM, for the conduction of the fieldwork, to the inhabitants of Cidade Nova, for their permissions to install the traps in their homes, and to Claudia T Codeço and Aline A Nobre, to the help with the statistical data analysis.

REFERENCES

• Barata EAMF, Costa AIP, Chiaravalloti-Neto F, Glasser CM, Barata JM, Natal D 2001. População de Aedes aegypti (L.) em área endêmica de dengue no Sudeste do Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 35: 237-242.
• Bosch JO, Geier M, Boeckh J 2000. Contribution of fatty acids to olfactory host finding of female Aedes aegypti. Chem Senses 25: 323-330.
• Canyon DV, Hii JLK 1997. Efficacy of carbon dioxide, 1-octen-3-ol, and lactic acid in modified Fay-Prince traps as compared to man-landing catch of Aedes aegypti. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 13: 66-70.
• Consoli RAGB, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R 1994. Principais mosquitos de importância sanitária no Brasil, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 228 pp.
• Dekker T, Geier M, Cardé RT 2005. Carbon dioxide instantly sensitizes female yellow fever mosquitoes to human skin odours. J Exp Biol 208: 2963-2972.
• Detinova TS 1962. Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria. Monogr Ser World Health Organ 47: 13-191.
• Eiras AE, Jepson PC 1991. Host location by Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): a wind tunnel study of chemical cues. Bull Entomol Res 81: 151-160.
• Gama RA, Silva IM, Resende MC, Eiras AE 2007. Evaluation of the sticky MosquiTRAP for monitoring Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in the district of Itapoã, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 36: 294-302.
• Geier M, Bosch OJ, Boeckh J 1999. Ammonia as an attractant of host odour for the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Chem Senses 24: 647-653.
• Kröckel U, Rose A, Eiras AE, Geier M 2006. New tools for surveillance of adult yellow fever mosquitoes: comparison of trap catches with human landing rates in a urban environment. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22: 229-239.
• Maciel-de-Freitas R, Codeço CT, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R 2007. Daily survival rates and dispersal of Aedes aegypti females in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 659-665.
• Maciel-de-Freitas R, Eiras AE, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R 2006. Field evaluation of effectiveness of the BG-Sentinel, a new trap for capturing adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 101: 321-325.
• McNelly JR 1989. The CDC Trap as a special monitoring tool. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Meeting of the New Jersey Mosquito Control Association, Available from: rci.rutgers.edu/~insects/cdctrap.htm.
• Meeraus WH, Armistead JS, Arias JR 2008. Field comparison of novel and gold standard traps for collecting Aedes albopictus in Northern Virginia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 24: 244-248.
• Morais MBJ 2009. Avaliação de métodos de amostragem na captura do mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) (Diptera: Culicidae), MsD Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, 50 pp.
• MS/FUNASA - Ministério da Saúde/Fundação Nacional de Saúde 2002. Programa Nacional de Controle da Dengue - PNCD, FUNASA, Brasília, 34 pp.
• Reeves WC 1990. Quantitative field studies on a carbon dioxide chemotropism of mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6: 708-712.
• Reiter P, Nathan MB 2001. Guidelines for assessing the efficacy of insecticidal space sprays for control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Available from: whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_CDS_CPE_PVC_2001.1.pdf.
  » whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_CDS_CPE_PVC_2001.1.pdf
• Ritchie SA, Moore P, Carruthers M, Williams C, Montgomery B, Foley P, Ahboo S, Van-den-Hurk A, Lindsay M, Cooper B, Beebe N, Russel R 2006. Discovery of a widespread infestation of Aedes albopictus in the Torres Strait, Australia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22: 358-365.
• Russel RC 2004. The relative attractiveness of carbon dioxide and octenol in CDC-and EVS-type light trap for sampling the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti (L.), Aedes polynesiensis Marks and Culex quinquefasciatus Say in Moorea, French Polynesia. J Vector Ecol 29: 309-314.
• Service MW 1992. Review: importance of ecology in Aedes aegypti control. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 23: 681-690.
• Williams CR, Long SA, Russel RC, Ritchie SA 2006. Field efficacy of the BG-Sentinel compared with CDC backpack aspirators and CO2-baited EVS traps for collection of adult Aedes aegypti in Cairns, Queensland, Australia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22: 296-300.
• Williams CR, Long SA, Webb CE, Bitzhenner M, Geier M, Russel RC, Ritchie SA 2007. Aedes aegypti population sampling using BG-Sentinel traps in north Queensland Australia: statistical considerations for trap deployment and sampling strategy. J Med Entomol 44: 345-350.

• Financial support: World Bank, CNPq, UEA, FAPEAM

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Apr 2013

History

• Received
  17 Oct 2012
• Accepted
  15 Jan 2013