Gastropods as intermediate hosts of Angiostrongylus spp. in the Americas: bioecological characteristics and geographical distribution

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intermediate hosts are key organisms in maintaining parasite life cycles, because they can act as amplifiers in the transmission from natural reservoirs to humans. One of the most important groups of intermediate hosts for zoonotic nematode infections are gastropods,slugs and snails. These are essential organisms in the larval development of Angiostrongylus species.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this paper is to review reports of Angiostrongylus spp. in naturally infected gastropods from the Americas, taking into account the diagnostic methods used in their identification, to be able to provide more accurate list of their intermediate hosts. We also discuss the factors that aid the dispersion of Angiostrongylus spp. in the Americas.

METHODS

This study reviews scientific publications and book sections on Angiostrongylus spp. in the Americas, including original works assessing larvae of Angiostrongylus in intermediate hosts. The eligible reports were classified accordingly to their geographical location, year of first record, and the larvae identification methodologies used. Digital repositories were used for the search. The bioecological characteristics of the main intermediate hosts are summarised.

FINDINGS

A total of 29 gastropod species that are naturally infected with Angiostrongylus spp. have been reported as intermediate hosts, 16 of which are land snails, two are freshwater snails, and 11 land slugs.

MAIN CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of integrative studies, analysing both the etiological agent and its transmission dynamic in the environment, the biological and ecological characteristics of the hosts, and the impact on host populations. It is necessary to increase interdisciplinary studies to determine the potential epidemiological health risk of angiostrongyliasis in the Americas, and thus be able to establish prevention, monitoring and contingency strategies in the region.

Key words:
parasite; strategies of monitoring; zoonoses; intermediate host

Zoonoses are diseases transmitted from wild/domestic animals to humans.¹ Transmission to humans is via preparation or ingestion of infected food or through close contact with infected animals.² This dynamic is maintained a permanent focus of pathogen circulation in a specific geographical environment.^1,3

Although direct contact is not frequent between humans and natural reservoirs in wildlife, exposure to a pathogenic agent can occur through any intermediate host (IH) (e.g., invertebrates, fishes) used as bait or in consumption.⁴ Intermediate hosts act as a bridge in the transmission of zoonotic pathogens, because they are amplifiers that maintain the transmission from natural reservoirs to humans. In consequence, monitoring possible IHs as pathogen transmitters is important in epidemiology, particularly for the prevention and control of emerging zoonoses.⁵

Among the invertebrates, gastropods constitute one of the most important IHs groups for zoonotic nematode infections. In the case of Angiostrongylidae (Metastrongyloidea) slugs and snails are essential organisms in which the larvae develop.⁶

Angiostrongyliasis, caused by both Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen 1935) and Angiostrongylus costaricensis Morera and Céspedes 1971 is a zoonotic disease. Adults of A. cantonensis inhabit the pulmonary artery or right ventricle of the heart, while adults of A. costaricensis are found in the mesenteric arteries of the caecum of their definitive host (DH) (e.g., mustelids, procyonids, felids, canids, and mainly rodents).⁷ DHs release first-stage larvae in faeces, and these utilise slugs and/or snails as IHs. The gastropods are infected by ingestion or penetration of first-stage larvae; while DHs are infected by eating infected gastropods or by contact with their slime. Transmission can also involve ingestion of paratenic hosts, such as planarias, frogs, freshwater shrimps and crabs.^8,9,10

Species of Angiostrongylus have been recorded in a wide range of gastropods, indicating low host specificity for their His.^6,11,12 In the Americas, gastropod species have been reported harbouring Angiostrongylus spp.,¹³ but many reports are of experimentally infected gastropods that would be unlikely to act as IHs in nature.^12,14 In other cases, identification was performed using only morphological characteristics, but it is known that the larvae features in this genus are insufficient for identification at species level. It was therefore important to review the list of IHs and highlight the identification methods used for larvae determination.

In this study, we review reports of Angiostrongylus spp. in naturally infected gastropods from the Americas, taking into account the diagnostic methods used in their identification, to be able to provide more accurate list of their intermediate hosts. Also, we discuss the factors that aid the dispersion of Angiostrongylus spp. in the continent, mainly considering the bioecological characteristics, origin and geographical distribution of each gastropod species acting as an IH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature reviewed in this study includes scientific publications and book sections about Angiostrongylus spp. in the Americas. Original papers assessing larvae of Angiostrongylus in IHs have been included. The reports found, up to March 2020, were in Spanish, Portuguese and English using the descriptor words: Angiostrongylus sp, intermediate host, angiostrongyliasis. An exhaustive search was performed using the digital repositories Scielo, Redalyc, Scopus, Dialnet, Pubmed, and Google Academic. Personal communications at congresses and conference reports were not included.

The eligible reports were classified according to their geographical location, first year of record at this site, hosts recorded at the site, and the larvae identification methodologies used. To provide a complete characterisation, previously known data on DHs compiled in Valente et al.¹⁵ were added to each Angiostrongylus species.

To understand nematode dispersion and to detect patterns, information on diet, microhabitat, environment and origin was summarised, among other bioecological characteristics of the main intermediate hosts.

RESULTS

Diagnosis of the larvae - Angiostrongylus larvae were recorded in different IHs and sites throughout the Americas. Several reports of Angiostrongylus L3 in gastropods were based only on molecular techniques (Tables I-II). Other reports resulted from the implementation of two methods of identification, some combining morphological and experimental methods, and others using both morphological and molecular techniques. However, many records were based only on morphological characterisation of Angiostrongylus L3.

TABLE I
Geographical sites recorded, definitive hosts known, year of first larval record, intermediate host recorded and larval identification methodology, for Angiostrongylus cantonensis in the Americas

Geographical site	Definitive host known	first record of larvae	Intermediate host	Larval identification methodology	References
Havana, Cuba	Yes	1977	Veronicella cubensis (Pfeiffer 1840) B. similaris	Morphological-experimentation	45
		2015	A. fulica	Morphological	53
Puerto Rico	Yes	1984	S. octona	Morphological-experimentation	46
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic	Yes	1991	S. octona	Morphological	54
Jamaica	Yes	2000	Thelidomus aspera (Férrusac 1821)	Morphological	55
		2013	Pleurodonte sp. Sagda sp. Poteria sp.	Morphological	56
Espírito Santo, Brazil	Yes	2007	S. octona A. fulica B. similaris	Molecular PCR-RFLP (ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	57
		2010	S. linguaeformis	Molecular PCR-RFLP (ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	13
São Paulo, Brazil	Yes	2007	A. fulica S. octona	Molecular PCR-RFLP (ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	57
		2009	S. linguaeformis		13
		2011	B. similaris
Paraná, Brazil	No	2008	A. fulica	Molecular PCR-RFLP (ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	13
Bahia, Brazil	No	2009	A. fulica B. similaris S. octona S. linguaeformis	Molecular PCR-RFLP (ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	13
Pernambuco, Brazil	No	2008	A. fulica P. lineata	Morphological-molecular PCR- RFLP(ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	58
Pará, Brazil	Yes	2009	A. fulica S. octona	Molecular PCR (COI), PCR-RFLP(ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	59
		2010	S. linguaeformis		13
Santa Catarina, Brazil	No	2009	B. similaris	Molecular PCR-RFLP (ITS2/ClaI enzyme)	13
		2010	A. fulica
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil	Yes	2010	A. fulica	Morphological-experimentation	47
Amazonas, Brazil	No	2014	A. fulica	Morphological	60
Sergipe, Brazil	No	2016	A. fulicaCyclodontina fasciata (Potiez & Michaud 1838) Bulimulus tenuissimus (d’Orbigny 1835)	Molecular PCR (COI)	61
Guayas, Ecuador	Yes	2008	A. fulica P. lineata	Morphological-experimentation	41
Louisiana, USA	Yes	2013	P. maculata	Molecular PCR(18S)	62
Florida, USA	Yes	2013	A. fulica	Molecular qPCR (ITS1)	63
		2015	Alcadia striata (Lamarck 1822) B. similaris Zachrysia provisoria (Pfeiffer 1858)	Molecular qPCR (ITS1)	51
		2017	Paropeas achatinaceum (Pfeiffer 1846) Succinea floridana Pilsbry 1905 Ventridens demissus (Binney 1843) Zonitoides arboreus (Say 1816)	Molecular qPCR (ITS1)	43
Colombia	No	2014	A. fulica	Morphological	64

• PCR-RFLP: polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; qPCR: quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

TABLE II
Geographical sites recorded, definitive hosts known, year of first larval record, intermediate host recorded and larval identification methodology, for Angiostrongylus costaricensis in the Americas

Geographical site	Definitive host known	First record of larvae	Intermediate host	Larval identification methodology	References
Costa Rica	Yes	1970	S. plebeia Diplosolenodes occidentalis	Morphological	65
Paraná, Brazil	Yes	1991	L. maximus B. similaris L. flavus	Morphological	32
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil	Yes	1993	Cornu aspersum P. variegatus P. soleiformis B. angustipes B. similaris	Morphological	29 , 66
	2018	Meghimatium pictum	Morphological-experimentation	67
Santa Catarina, Brazil	Yes	1999	P. variegatus S. linguaeformis D. laeve	Morphological	68
Ecuador	Yes	1993	S. plebeia	Morphological	66
Honduras	Yes	1993	S. plebeia	Morphological	66
Nicaragua	Yes	1993	S. plebeia	Morphological	66

Most reports of A. cantonensis were based on experimental and/or molecular methods, while most of the records of the other Angiostrongylus spp. larvae have only been based on morphological analyses.

In addition, on several occasions the susceptibility to infection of different gastropod species has been evaluated with positive results, as in the case of Biomphalaria spp. and Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck 1822).^12,14,16 However, this study includes a list only of naturally infected IHs.

Intermediate hosts and their bioecological characteristics -Table III shows the bioecological characteristics of the 29 gastropod species reported as IHs of Angiostrongylus spp. and the ecological and environmental features associated with these.

TABLE III
American distribution and bioecological characteristics of naturally intermediate hosts reported for Angiostrongylus spp.

Host species	Distribution	Diet	Microhabitat	Environment	Origin*	Human consumption	Sex	Estivation hibernation	Activity	Reprod. rate **	Parasite
Achatina fulica	Original of East África. In the Americas: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Caribbean Islands, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, USA,Venezuela	Polip Copro	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Exotic	Yes	Her	Yes	Noct	Hight	Aca
Bradybaena similaris	Original of East Asia. In the Americas: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Paraguay, Puerto Rico, Uruguay, USA	Polyp	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Exotic	No	Her	Yes	Noct	Low	Aca Aco
Subulina octona	Original of Europe. Caribbean Sea. In South America: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Exotic	No	Her	No	Diur	Low	Aca
Veronicella cubensis	Cuba, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Lesser Antilles	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	No	Noct	Low	Aca
Thelidomus aspera	Jamaica	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Unknown	Diur	Low	Aca
Pleudodonte sp.	Jamaica	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Unknown	Diur	Low	Aca
Sagda sp	Jamaica	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Unknown	Diur	Low	Aca
Poteria sp.	Jamaica	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Unknown	Diur	Low	Aca
Pomacea lineata	Brazil, Guyana, French Guyana, Surinam	Detr	Aquatic	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Dio	Yes	Diur	Low	Aca
Pomacea maculata	Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay	Detr	Aquatic	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Dio	Yes	Diur	Medium	Aca
Cyclodontina fasciata	Brazil	Herb	-	Trop	Native	No	Her	Unknown	Noct	Low	Aca
Bulimulus tenuissimus	Brazil and USA	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	No	Noct	Low	Aca
Zachrysia provisoria	Cuba and USA	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Unknown	Noct	Low	Aca
Alcadia striata	Caribbean Islands and USA	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Unknown	Noct	Low	Aca
Paropeas achatinaceum	Original of Southeast Asia. Currently in USA	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Exotic	No	Her	No	Diur	Low	Aca
Succinea floridana	USA	Herb	Damp habitat	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	No	Diur	Low	Aca
Ventridens demissus	USA	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	No	Diur	Low	Aca
Zonitoides arboreus	USA, Central America, Argentina	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	No	Diur	Low	Aca
Cornu aspersum	Original of Europe. Currently in Canada, USA, Mexico, Dominic Republic, Puero Rico, Guatemala, Costa Rica Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela	Herb	Domiciliary	Trop/Subtrop	Exotic	Yes	Her		Noct	Low	Aco
Sarasinula plebeia	Original of New Caledonia. Currently in USA, Mexico, Caribbean Islands, Central America, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru,Venezuela	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Pantrop	Exotic	No	Her	Yes	Noct	Low	Aco
Sarasinula linguaeformis	Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Dominica, Ecuador, Guadalupe, Guyana, Peru	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Yes	Noct	Low	Aco
Limax maximus	Original of Europe. Currently in Canada, USA, Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras, Hawaii, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia	Herb	Domiciliary	Template	Exotic	No	Her	No	Noct	Low	Aco
Limacus flavus	Original of Europe and Asia. Currenty in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Uruguay, USA	Herb	Domiciliary	Template	Exotic	No	He.	No	Noct	Low	Aco
Phyllocaulis variegatus	Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Yes	Noct	-	Aco
Phyllocaulis soleiformis	Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Uruguay	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Exotic	No	Her	Yes	Noct		Aco
Deroceras laeve	Original of Europe. Currently in Canada, USA, Mexico, Jamaica, Costa Rica, Hawaii, Dominica, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Paraguay, Uruguay	Herb	Domiciliary	Template	Exotic	No	Her	No	Noct		Aco
Belocaulus angustipes	USA, Honduras, Argentina, Brazil	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Yes	Noct		Aco
Diplosolenodes occidentalis	Central America, Jamaica, Lesser Antilles, Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela	Herb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Native	No	Her	Yes	Noct		Acos
Meghimatium pictum	Original of Eastern and Southern Asia. In South America: Argentina, Brazil	Heb	Domiciliary pest	Trop/Subtrop	Exotic	No	Her	No	Noct		Aco

• Trop/Subtrop: tropical/subtropical; Pantrop: pantropical; Reprod. rate in comp. with A. fulica: reproduction rate in comparison with A. fulica; Polyp: polyphagous; Copr: coprophagous; Herb: herbivorous; Detr: detritivorous; Her: hermaphrodite; Dio: dioco; Noct: nocturnal; Diur: diurnal; Aca: Angiostrongylus cantonensis; Aco: Angiostrongylus costaricensis. *: the terms native refers to its origin in the Americas; **: reprod. rate in comp. with A. fulica: high: > 500 eggs; medium: > 250 eggs ≤ 500 eggs; low: ≤ 250 eggs.

Bradybaena similaris (Férrusac 1822), Achatina fulica Bowdich 1822, Sarasinula linguaeformis (Semper 1885) and Subulina octona (Bruguiére 1789) are the most frequent land gastropods reported as IHs of A. cantonensis in the Americas. Some of these species are considered crop pests due to their trophic habits and A. fulica is known to also have coprophagic habits.¹⁷ These gastropods are found in residential areas, constituting a link between the synanthropic definitive hosts and humans, indicating a beneficial scenario for the development of A. cantonensis.^17,31

Among the IHs, A. fulica has a wide geographical distribution in the Americas (see Table III).^{9,18,19,20,21,22,23} This invasive gastropod has high reproductive rates and periods of estivation/hibernation, and as the most invasive species, its particular biological characteristics give it adaptive plasticity, and favour its role as the main IH for A. cantonensis.^5,24 Among freshwater IHs of A. cantonensis (Table III), only Pomacea lineata (Spix 1827) and Pomacea maculata (= P. insularum) Perry 1810 were reported.^25,26,27 The lack of records of Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck 1822) as an IH is striking, because its distribution in Brazil overlaps that of P. maculata. P. canaliculata is found in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay,^25,27 and is the main freshwater IH of A. cantonensis in Asia.²⁸

In the case of A. costaricensis, the reports of naturally infected IHs are mainly associated with land slugs: Belocaulus angustipes (Heynemann 1885), Deroceras laeve (Müller 1774), Diplosolenodes occidentalis (Guilding 1825), Limacus flavus (Linnaeus 1758), Limax maximus (Linnaeus 1758), Meghimatium pictum (Stoliczka 1873), Sarasinula linguaeformis (Semper 1885), Sarasinula plebeia (Fischer, 1868), Phyllocaulis soleiformis (d’Orbigny 1835) and Phyllocaulis variegatus (Semper 1885), with the only land snail reported being Cornu asperum (Müller 1774) (Thiengo et al.²⁹). These gastropods are considered as pests due their herbivorous habits. During estivation periods, some of them produce mucus around their bodies that isolate them from unfavourable conditions.^30,31

Several reports show a wide variety of IHs experimentally infected with A. costaricensis such as, B. glabrata (Say 1818), B. straminea (Dunker 1848), B. tenagophila (d’Orbigny 1835), Phyllocaulis boraceiensis Thomé 1972 and Megalobulimus abbreviatus (Bequaert 1948), and all these gastropod species are susceptible to develop infective larvae.^14,32,33

For the remaining Angiostrongylus species only two gastropods, B. glabrata and Polygra septemvolva (Say 1818), have been reported as intermediate hosts of A. schmidti Kinsella 1971,¹¹ and B.glabrata and P. canalicuta as IHs of A. vasorum (Bailliet 1866).^12,16,34 However, all these reports come from experimental gastropod infestations.

Most studies have focused on the gastropod species that are already known as IHs for Angiostrongylus. Therefore, it is possible that the number of IH species in the Americas has been underestimated.

Geographical distribution - Angiostrongylus larvae were recorded in 11 American countries, with Brazil being the country where most studies were performed. A. cantonensis is widely distributed in Central and South America (Table I), but there is no evidence that it was introduced from the western hemisphere by its DH (e.g., Rattus spp.) or its IH (e.g., the invasive gastropod A. fulica).^4,35,36 In contrast, A. costaricensis is not widely spread in the Americas, even though it is an endemic species (Table II).

The literature shows that Angiostrongylus felineus Vieira et al. 2013, A. gubernaculatus Dougherty 1946, A. lenzii Souza, Simões, Thiengo et al. 2009, A. morerai Robles, Navone and Kinsella 2008, A. raillieti Travassos 1927 and A. schmidti have a limited and overlapping geographical distribution in the Americas.^10,15 Their DHs are wild animals, and there are no reports of these Angiostrongylus species in synanthropic hosts from urban/agricultural areas. Furthermore, there are no records of their IHs, except for A. vasorum and A. schmidti from experimental research (Table II). Their zoonotic potential cannot be evaluated due to the lack of reports of their definitive and intermediate hosts.¹⁰

Native and exotic gastropods - Exotic species can influence ecosystem health by introducing parasites from their native area, or by amplifying parasites already existing in the introduced range.³⁷ Some invasive species can impact human health by carrying zoonotic parasites. When an exotic parasite reaches a native host species, the phenomenon is called “spillover”. When a native parasite infects an invasive host, leading to increased opportunities to infect autochthonous species, the phenomenon is called “spillback”.³⁷ One of the causes that favours these interactions is the low host specificity of the parasite.³⁸

Examples of low host specificity in this work are A. cantonensis and A. costaricensis, since both exotic and native species are involved as IHs. In the first case, only four of the 18 IH species reported are exotic: A. fulica, B. similaris, Subulina octona and Paropeas achatinaceum (Pfeiffer 1846) (Table III). Achatina fulica is native to Africa, being observed in the Americas for the first time in Hawaii in 1936, and later it was reported in the rest of the continent, except Chile and Uruguay.^39,40,41Bradybaena similaris is native to Asia, being observed for first time in the Americas in Brazil in 1835, and later it spread to almost all South America (Table III).^23,42S. octona originated in Europe, being recorded in South America in 1914,²³ while whereas P. achatinaceum is native to Southeast Asia.⁴³

Angiostrongylus costaricensis is endemic to the Americas and almost the same number of exotic and of endemic gastropod species have been reported as IHs (6 vs 5) (Table III).

Thus, the dispersion of Angiostrongylus spp. in the Americas is favoured by low host specificity and the high number of naturally infected gastropod species.

DISCUSSION

The present study lists all the records and IHs identified as reservoirs of Angiostrongylus spp. larvae in the Americas. Reports were analysed, taking into account the diagnostic methods. Additionally, the bioecological characteristics, origin and geographical distribution of the IHs recorded in the literature were also summarised.

Currently, only two of the nine Angiostrongylus species distributed in the Americas have been confirmed as zoonotic agents (i.e., A. cantonensis and A. costaricensis). Nevertheless, the potential health risk of the rest of the Angiostrongylus species remains unknown.

Identification of larvae of Angiostrongylus spp. by morphological methods is very difficult. The main morphological characteristics used by the authors are shape and body length, oesophagus length, excretory pore to the anterior end distance, genital primordium to posterior end distance, tail length, and tip of tail.⁴⁴ Unfortunately, the small size (400-600 µm) and the absence of diagnostic morphological characters developed of the infective larvae (L3) does not allow a good identification.

Fortunately, in recent years the diagnostics of parasites has been supported by experimental and molecular tools.^45,46,47 There are two types of experimental methods: in one case, captive mammals (e.g., Rattus sp.) are fed with a pool of live larvae (L3) obtained from naturally infected IH (e.g., A. fulica). After 28 days post infection, immature (L4-L5) and adult worms are found in the DH, of which accurate morphological identification is possible (e.g., Andersen et al.⁴⁶). In other cases, first-stage larvae are isolated from the faeces of the DH. Gastropods are fed with a pool of isolated larvae (L1). After 30 days post infection, L3 that emerge from the IH are identified morphologically.^11,12,16

In the case of the molecular methods, gastropods are artificially digested according to the Wallace & Rosen⁴⁸ and Baermann-Moraes techniques.¹⁵ After sedimentation, the material is analysed under a stereomicroscope and the larvae recovered from each collection pool are identified following DNA extraction and sequencing methods.

From 1977 to 2007, all the reports of A. cantonensis larvae were based on morphological and experimental methods, and they were recorded only in Central America. From 2007 to the present, its larvae were identified by molecular techniques, and were focused in South America. In contrast, all identifications of A. costaricensis larvae were carried out only by morphological methods. From 1999 until now, no new gastropod species have been added as IHs for Angiostrongylus spp., but probably the range of IHs has been underestimated. In the cases of A. vasorum and A. schmidti in the Americas, the larvae were obtained by experimental methods, presenting a similar eco-epidemiological scenario to that of A. costaricensis.

Host-parasite interactions are affected by genetic, biological and ecological aspects of both members of the relationship. Land gastropod species, such as A. fulica, B. similaris, Phyllocaulis spp., Sarasinula spp. and Belocaulus angustipes, show some bioecological characteristics that would favour Angiostrongylus spp. dispersion, such as polyphagia, peridomiciliary restriction, nocturnal habits, and estivation/ hibernation periods.¹⁷ These IHs act as a link between synanthropic definitive hosts and humans. Additionally, unlike other species of gastropods, A. fulica is eaten raw by humans in many regions (e.g., Ecuador, Jamaica), increasing the risk of disease.⁴¹

Environment plays an important role in the interaction between Angiostrongylus spp. and their IHs. Any disturbances in the structure and function of the ecosystem could indirectly influence zoonoses transmission.⁴⁹ The conversion of natural habitats to agricultural land, pastures and plantations due to the expanding human population has caused the displacement of wildlife and the wild/urban interface, causing more contact between humans and wild animals.^5,50 In this context, it is very important to continuously monitor different environments, to detect those changes that could favour the installation of a new focus of infection.

Introduction of exotic species could affect the equilibrium of an ecosystem by the invasion of new parasite species in native hosts, or amplify the parasites that already exist in the area.³⁷ The former seems to be the case in the introduction of A. cantonensis in the Americas, which has been able to invade at least 14 native gastropod species by “spillover”. On the other hand, A. costaricensis, which parasitises native species, was able to invade exotic gastropods, also favouring its dispersion by “spillback”. Apparently, both phenomena added to the low host specificity that these Angiostrongylus species seem to have, favouring the dispersion of these zoonoses in the Americas. The current paper demonstrates that the spread of A. cantonensis and A. costaricensis through gastropod IHs in the Americas is not limited to exotic or native origins. As has been stated, the success in obtaining larvae of Angiostrongylus spp. by infecting different freshwater gastropods denotes their low host specificity,^43,51 which constitutes a risk since it favours the dispersion of the species.

The information in the present review about the IHs of Angiostrongylus spp. complements the previous study of Valente et al.¹⁵ on DHs, and sumarises all the available information in the Americas. In addition, this study highlights the importance of integrative studies, analysing both the etiological agent and the dynamic of its transmission in the environment, the biological and ecological characteristics of its hosts, and the impact on host populations. This is in agreement with the concept of “One Health” that states that human and animal health are interdependent and are linked to the environment in which they coexist. In this way, the etiological agent, the host and the environment constitute a triad that is influenced by continuous variations caused by environmental and social changes.⁵²

It is necessary incrase interdisciplinary studies to determine the potential epidemiological health risk of angiostrogiliasis in the Americas, and thus be able to establish prevention, monitoring and contingency strategies in the region.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To Joss Heywood for the English revision of the manuscript. We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for the invaluable contribution in improving this manuscript.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Acha PN, Szyfres B. Zoonosis y enfermedades transmisibles comunes al hombre y a los animales. Vol. 3. In: PN Acha, B Szyfres. Angiostrongyliasis. Washington D.C: OPS; 2003. p. 225-31.
• ²
  Karesh WB, Dobson A, Lloyd-Smith JO, Lubroth J, Dixon MA, Bennett M, et al. Ecology of zoonoses: natural and unnatural histories. Lancet. 2012; 380: 1936-45.
• ³
  Holt R, Dobson AP. Disease ecology: community structure and pathogen dynamics. In: SK Collinge, C Ray. Extending the principles of community ecology to address the epidemiology of host-pathogen systems. North Carolina: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 6.
• ⁴
  Wang QP, Lai DH, Zhu XQ, Chen XG, Lun ZR. Human angiostrongyliasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008; 8(10): 621-30.
• ⁵
  Cui J, Chen F, Fan S. Effect of intermediate hosts on emerging zoonoses. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017; 17(8): 599-609.
• ⁶
  Grewal PS, Grewal SK, Tan L, Adams BJ. Parasitism of molluscs by nematodes: types of associations and evolutionary trends. J Nematol. 2003; 35(2): 146-56.
• ⁷
  Gibbons L. Keys to the nematode parasite of vertebrates. In: L Gibbons. Metastrongyloidea. Wallingford: CABI International; 2010. p. 200.
• ⁸
  Cross J. Angiostrongylus (Parastrongylus) cantonensis in the Western Hemisphere. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004; 35(1): 107-11.
• ⁹
  Thiengo SC, Faraco A, Salgado N, Cowie R, Fernandez M. Rapid spread of an invasive snail in South America: the giant African snail Achatina fulica. Biol Invasions. 2007; 9: 693-702.
• ¹⁰
  Spratt DM. Species of Angiostrongylus (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) in wildlife: a review. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015; 4(2): 178-89.
• ¹¹
  Kinsella JM. Studies of the life cycle and host especificity of Parastrongylus schmidti (Nematoda: Angiostrongylidae). Proc Helminthol Soc Wash. 1987; 54(2): 245-8.
• ¹²
  Mozzer L, Coaglio A, Dracz R, Ribeiro V, Lima W. The development of Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866) in the freshwater snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1822). J Parasitol. 2015; 89: 755-9.
• ¹³
  Carvalho OS, Scholte RGC, de Mendonça CLF, Passos LKJ, Caldeira RL. Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematode: Metastrongyloidea) in molluscs from harbour areas in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012; 107(6): 740-6.
• ¹⁴
  Lima LC, Massara CL, Souza CP, Vidigal TD, Lenzi, HL, Carvalho OS. Suscetibilidade de planorbídeos da região metropolitana de Belo Horizonte, MG (Brasil) ao Angiostrongylus costaricensis (Nematoda, Angiostrongylidae). Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 1992; 34(5): 399-402.
• ¹⁵
  Valente R, Robles MR, Navone GT, Diaz JI. Angiostrongylus spp. in the Americas: geographical and chronological distribution of definitive hosts versus disease reports. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2018; 113(3): 143-52.
• ¹⁶
  Barcante T, Barcante JP, Dias SC, Lima W. Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866) Kamensky, 1905: emergence of third-stage larvae from infected Biomphalaria glabrata snails. Parasitol Res. 2003; 91: 471-5.
• ¹⁷
  SINAVIMO - Sistema Nacional Argentino de Vigilancia y Monitoreo de Plagas. 2020. Available from: https://www.sinavimo.gov.ar/
  » https://www.sinavimo.gov.ar/
• ¹⁸
  Borrero FJ, Breure AS, Christensen C, Correoso M, Ávila VM. Into the Andes: three new introductions of Lissachatina fulica (Gastropoda, Achatinidae) and its potential distribution in South America. Tentacle. 2009; 17: 6-8.
• ¹⁹
  Rodríguez MC, Coello M. Modelación y distribución de Lissachatina fulica (Gastropoda: Achatinidae) en Ecuador. Potenciales impactos ambientales y sanitarios. Rev Geoespacial. 2009; 6: 79-90.
• ²⁰
  Gregoric DEG, Nuñez V, Vogler R, Rumi A. Invasion of the Argentinean Paranense rainforest by giant African snail, Achatina fulica. Am Malacol Bull. 2011; 29(3): 135-7.
• ²¹
  Ciomperlik M, Robinson D, Gibbs I, Fields A, Stevens T, Taylor B. Mortality to the giant African snail, Lissachatina fulica (gastropoda: Achatinidae), and non-target snails using select target snails using select. Fla Entomol. 2013; 96(2): 370-9.
• ²²
  Miquel S, Herrera H. Catalogue of terrestrial gastropods from Galápagos (except Bulimulidae and Succineidae) with description of a new species of Ambrosiella odhner (Achatinellidae). Arch Molluskenkunde. 2014; 143(2): 107-33.
• ²³
  Darrigran G, Agudo-Padron I, Baez P, Belz C, Cardoso F, Carranza A, et al. Non-native mollusks throughout South America: emergent patterns in an understudied continent. Biol Invasions. 2020; 22: 853-71.
• ²⁴
  Gregoric DEG, Beltramino A, Vogler R, Rumi A. Expansión del rango de distribución de Achatina fulica (Gastropoda) y su concordancia con modelos predictivos. Amici Molluscarum. 2013; 21(1): 17-21.
• ²⁵
  Cowie R, Thiengo SC. The apple snails of the Americas (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Ampullariidae: Asolene, Felipponea, Marisa, Pomacea, Pomella): a nomeclatural and type catalog. Malacol. 2003; 45(1): 41-100.
• ²⁶
  Hayes K, Cowie R, Thiengo SC, Strong E. Comparing apples with apples: clarifying the identities of two highly invasive Neotropical Ampullariidae (Caenogastropoda). Zool J Linn Soc. 2012; 166(4): 723-53.
• ²⁷
  Cowie R, Hayes K, Strong E, Thiengo SC. Biology and management of invasive apple snails. In: Joshi RC, Cowie R, Sebastian L. Non-native apple snails: systematics, distribution, invasion history and reasons for introduction. Neuva Ecija: Philippine Rice Research Institute; 2017. p. 3-32.
• ²⁸
  Yang TB, Wu ZD, Lun ZR. The apple snail Pomacea canaliculata, a novel vector of the rat lungworm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis: its introduction, spread, and control in China. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013; 72(Suppl. 6): 23-5.
• ²⁹
  Thiengo SC, Amato SB, Aventino A, Araújo JLB. Estudo sobre os hospedeiros intermediários do Angiostrongylus costaricensis Morera & Céspedes, 1971. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 1993; 2(1): 64.
• ³⁰
  Thomé JW. Redescrição dos tipos de Veronicellidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda) neotropicais. VII. Espécies depositadas no "Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle", Paris, França. Zool. 1971; 40: 27-52.
• ³¹
  Ohlweiler FP, Takahashi FY, Guimarães MCA, Gomes SR, Kawano T. Manual de gastrópodes límnicos e terrestres do estado de São Paulo asociados às helmintoses. Porto Alegre: Redes; 2010. 230 pp.
• ³²
  Graeff-Teixeira C, Thiengo SC, Thomé JW, Medeiros AB, Camillo-Coura L, Agostini AA. On the diversity of mollusc intermediate hosts of Angiostrongylus costaricensis Morera & Cespedes, 1971 in Southern Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1993; 88(3): 487-9.
• ³³
  Bonetti V, Graeff-Teixeira C. Angiostrongylus costaricensis and the intermediate hosts: observations on elimination of L3 in the mucus and inoculation of L1 through the tegument of molluscs. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1998; 31(3): 289-94.
• ³⁴
  Rosen L, Ash L, Wallace G. Life history of the canine lungworm Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet). Am J Vet Med Res. 1970; 31(1): 131-43.
• ³⁵
  Alicata JE. The discovery of Angiostrongylus cantonensis as a cause of human eosinophilic meningitis. Parasitol Today. 1991; 7(6): 151-3.
• ³⁶
  Cross J. The spread of Angiostrongyliasis: the globetrotting rat lungworm. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2007; 38(1): 43-6.
• ³⁷
  Chalkowski K, Lepczyk CA, Zohdy S. Parasite ecology of invasive species: conceptual framework and new hypotheses. Trends Parasitol. 2018; 34(8): 655-63.
• ³⁸
  Landaeta-Aqueveque C, Robles MR, Henríquez A, Yáñez-Meza A, Correa J, González-Acuña D, et al. Phylogenetic and ecological factors affecting the sharing of helminths between native and introduced rodents in Central Chile. Parasitol. 2018; 145(12): 1570-6.
• ³⁹
  Davis C, Butler Jr G. Introduced enemies of the Giant African Snail, Achatina fulica Bowdich, in Hawaii (Pulmonata: Achatinidae). Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc. 1964; 18(3): 377-90.
• ⁴⁰
  Vogler R, Beltramino A, Sede M, Gregoric DEG, Núñez V, Rumi A. The giant African snail, Achatina fulica (Gastropoda: Achatinidae): using bioclimatic models to identify South American areas susceptible to invasion. Am Malacol Bull. 2013; 31: 39-50.
• ⁴¹
  Robles LM, Contreras AJD. Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Emergencia en América. In: LM Robles, AJD Contreras. Ecuador: Academia; 2016. p. 1-289.
• ⁴²
  Serniotti E, Guzmán L, Beltramino AA, Vogler R, Rumi A, Peso J. New distributional records of the exotic land snail Bradybaena similaris (Férussac, 1822) (Gastropoda, Bradybaenidae) in Argentina. BioInvasions Rec. 2019; 8(2): 301-13.
• ⁴³
  Stockdale-Walden HD, Slapcinsky JD, Roff S, Calle JM, Goodwin ZD, Stern J, et al. Geographic distribution of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in wild rats (Rattus rattus) and terrestrial snails in Florida, USA. PLoS One. 2017: 1-13.
• ⁴⁴
  Ash L. Diagnostic morphology of the third stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, and Anafilaroide rostratus (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea). J Parasitol. 1970; 56(2): 249-53.
• ⁴⁵
  Aguiar PH, Morera P, Pascual JE. First record of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Cuba. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1981; 30(5): 963-5.
• ⁴⁶
  Anderson E, Gubler DJ, Sorenson K, Beddard J, Ash LR. First report of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Puerto Rico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986; 35(2): 319-22.
• ⁴⁷
  Maldonado Jr A, Simões RO, Oliveira APM, Motta EM, Fernandez MA, Pereira ZM, et al. First report of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae) in Achatina fulica (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from Southeast and South Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010; 105(7): 938-41.
• ⁴⁸
  Wallace G, Rosen L. Techniques for recovering and identifying larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis from molluscs. Malacol. 1969; 7(2-3): 427-38.
• ⁴⁹
  Marcogliese D. Parasites of the superorganism: are they indicators of ecosystem health? Int J Parasitol. 2005; 35(7): 705-16.
• ⁵⁰
  Hanski I, Monnonen T. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environment. Ecol Lett. 2011; 14: 1025-34.
• ⁵¹
  Stockdale-Walden HD, Slapcinsky JD, Qvarnstrom Y, McIntosh, A. Angiostrongylus cantonensis in introduced gastropods in Southern Florida. J Parasitol. 2015; 101(2): 156-9.
• ⁵²
  Lerner H, Berg C. The concept of health in one health and some practical implications for research and education: What is one health? Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2015; 5: 1-7.
• ⁵³
  Vazquez-Silva G, Castro-Barrera T, Mejia J, Mendoza-Martinez G. Los caracoles del genero Pomacea y su importancia ecologica y socioeconomica. Contacto. 2011; 81: 28-33.
• ⁵⁴
  Vargas M, Gómez-Pérez J, Malek E. First record of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen 1935) (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae) in the Dominican Republic. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1992; 43(4): 253-5.
• ⁵⁵
  Lindo J, Waugh C, Hall J, Cunningham-Myrie C, Ashley D, Eberhard M. Enzootic Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rats and snails after outbreak of human eosinophilic meningitis in Jamaica. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002; 8(3): 324-6.
• ⁵⁶
  Robinson R, Waugh C, Todd C, Lorenzo-Morales J, Lindo J. Rat lungworm: an emerging zoonosis in Jamaica. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013; 72(6): 33.
• ⁵⁷
  Caldeira RL, Mendonça CLGF, Goveia CO, Lenzi HL, Graeff-Teixeira C, Lima WS, et al. First record of molluscs naturally infected with Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen, 1935) (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae) in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007; 102(7): 887-9.
• ⁵⁸
  Thiengo SC, Maldonado Jr A, Mota E, Torres E, Caldeira R, Carvalho OS, et al. The giant African snail Achatina fulica as natural intermediate host of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil. Acta Trop. 2010; 115(3): 194-9.
• ⁵⁹
  Moreira VL, Giese EG, Melo FT, Thiengo SC, Maldonado Jr A, et al. Endemic angiostrongyliasis in the Brazilian Amazon: natural parasitism of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Rattus rattus and R. norvegicus, and sympatric giant African land snails, Achatina fulica. Acta Trop. 2013; 125(1): 90-7.
• ⁶⁰
  Morassutti AL, Thiengo SC, Fernandez M, Sawanyawisuth K, Graeff-Teixeira C. Eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis: an emergent disease in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014; 109(4): 399-407.
• ⁶¹
  Ramos-de-Souza J, Thiengo SC, Fernandez M, Gomes SR, Corrêa-Antônio J, Clímaco MC, et al. First records of molluscs naturally infected with Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) in Sergipe State, Northeastern Brazil, including new global records of natural intermediate hosts. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2018; 60(51): 1-7.
• ⁶²
  Teem J, Qvarnstrom Y, Bishop H, da Silva A, Carter J, White-Mclean J, et al. The occurrence of the rat lungworm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis, in nonindigenous snails in the Gulf of Mexico region of the United States. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013; 72(6): 11-4.
• ⁶³
  Iwanowicz D, Sanders L, Schill W, Xayavong M, da Silva A, Qvarnstrom I, et al. Spread of the rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) in giant African land snails (Lissachatina fulica) in Florida, USA. J Wildl Dis. 2015; 51(3): 749-53.
• ⁶⁴
  Heredia N, Ávila A, Velásquez L. Cultivo in vitro de larvas L3 de nematodos obtenidas del caracol gigante africano Lissachatina fulica (Mollusca: Gastropoda) en Santa Fe de Antioquia. Biomedica. 2018; 38(2): 1.
• ⁶⁵
  Conejo M, Morera P. Influence of the age of Veronicellid slugs in Angiostrongylus costaricensis infection. Rev Biol Trop. 1988; 36(2B): 519-26.
• ⁶⁶
  Rambo PR, Agostini AA, Graeff-Teixeira C. Abdominal angiostrongylosis in Southern Brazil - Prevalence and parasitic burden in mollusc intermediate hosts from eighteen endemic foci. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1997; 92(1): 9-14.
• ⁶⁷
  Rodriguez R, Sandri ASS, Porto SM, Osório JB, Muller CA, Cognato BB, et al. Invasive slug Meghimatium pictum (Stoliczka,1873) infected by Angiostrongylus costaricensis Morera & Céspedes, 1971, and the possible risk of human infection associated with grape consumption. J Helminthol. 2018; 93(6): 775-7.
• ⁶⁸
  Laitano A, Genro J, Fontoura R, Branco S, Maurer R, Graeff-Teixeira C. Report on the occurrence of Angiostrongylus costaricensis in southern Brazil, in a new intermediate host from the genus Sarasinula (Veronicellidae, Gastropoda). Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2001; 34(1): 95-7.

• Financial support: This research was funded by PUE Conicet-Cepave 2017-2021.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  27 Nov 2020
• Date of issue
  2020

History

• Received
  14 May 2020
• Accepted
  12 Nov 2020