SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 issue4Communication and education in health consultations to children with acute respiratory infectionsKnowledge and attitudes of patients with diabetes mellitus in a primary health care system author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP

Print version ISSN 0080-6234

Rev. esc. enferm. USP vol.45 no.4 São Paulo Aug. 2011

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342011000400009 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Locus of control in health and self-esteem in type-2 diabetic patients

 

Locus de control en salud y autoestima en pacientes de diabetes mellitus tipo 2

 

 

Fernanda Silva FuscaldiI; Alessandra Cristina Sartore BalsanelliII; Sonia Aurora Alves GrossiIII

IRN, University of São Paulo, Nursing School. São Paulo, SP, Brazil. fefuscaldi@usp.br
IIRN. MSc in Nursing. Doctoral Student at the University of São Paulo, Nursing Program in Adult Health. São Paulo, SP, Brazil. alesartore@usp.br
IIIProfessor, University of São Paulo, Nursing School, Medical Surgical Nursing Department. São Paulo, SP, Brazil. sogrossi@usp.br

Correspondence addressed to:

 

 


ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to relate the scores obtained with the application of the scales of locus of control of health and self esteem with socio-demographic and clinical variables, risk factors and chronic complications in 65 patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman's Correlations tests. Regarding the locus of control, in average, patients presented higher scores in the internal dimension, and women showed more externality-at random for health. Statistically significant relationships were found between internality with time of diagnosis and physical activity; between externality-other powerful entities with glycated hemoglobin and physical activity; and between externality-at random with practice of physical activity. Most individuals has high self-esteem, but no variable was statistically related.

Descriptors: Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Scales; Control; Self-concept


RESUMEN

El estudio objetivó relacionar los puntajes obtenidos por aplicación de escalas de locus de control de salud y autoestima con variables sociodemográficas, clínicas, factores de riesgo y complicaciones crónicas en 65 pacientes de diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Estudio descriptivo transversal, fueron utilizados para el análisis estadístico las pruebas de Qui-cuadrado de Pearson, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis y de Correlación de Spearman. En relación al locus de control, los pacientes presentaron en promedio mayores puntajes en la dimensión interna, siendo las mujeres quienes demostraron mayor externalidad al acaso para la salud. Relaciones estadísticamente significativas fueron encontradas entre internalidad con tiempo de diagnóstico y actividad física, entre externalidad-otros poderosos con hemoglobina glicosilada y actividad física y entre externalidad al acaso con práctica de actividad física. La autoestima fue alta en la mayoría de los individuos, sin embargo no se relacionó estadísticamente a ninguna variable.

Descriptores: Diabetes mellitus tipo 2; Escalas; Control; Autoimagen


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is a non-transmissible chronic disease, the prevalence of which is growing in Brazil and worldwide, becoming a severe public health problem(1). The disease is characterized by chronic hyperglycemia that results from a reduced or complete lack of production of insulin by the pancreas and/or peripheral resistance to the action of insulin(2).

The disease's etiological classification is defined in four subgroups: type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM1), type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2), other types of diabetes and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus(3-4).

DM2 manifests slowly and progressively and generally occurs in adults, when it is referred to as latent autoimmune diabetes(4). In general it results from variable degrees of insulin resistance and a relative deficiency of insulin secretion(2). Most patients are overweight(3). The diagnosis is achieved after individuals reach 40 years of age in 85% to 90% of the cases, though it may occur earlier and rarely in adolescents(4). Poor glycemic control over the course of life triggers the onset and worsening of chronic complications that include macroangiopathy, microangiopathy and peripheral and autonomic neuropathies.

Appropriate glycemic and blood pressure control reduces medical and social risks, avoiding a high rate of hospitalization and future complications such as cerebrovascular, corononary artery and peripheral vascular diseases, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, chronic renal failure and stroke(5-6).

Maintaining appropriate metabolic control throughout life is not an easy task because diabetes is an unpredictable disease and each person responds differently to treatment(7). Health education in diabetes is an important resource to control the disease but does not ensure nor always contributes to the improvement of patients' glycemic levels(8). Teaching individuals to live with a chronic disease implies assessing psychosocial aspects (beliefs, self-efficacy, locus of control, self-esteem, readiness to change, among others) in the search of social support, in addition to teaching coping strategies necessary for managing diabetes in all its varied situations.

Among the psychosocial aspects involved in the management of chronic diseases, the construct 'locus of control' has been studied for many years. The study of locus of control was initially developed by Rotter in the 1950s within the social learning theory. The author states that the probability of a specific behavior to occur in a given situation is a function of one's expectation that such behavior will lead to obtainment of a reinforcement (behavioral stimulus) and the value the individual attributes to such reinforcement.

Locus of control is a dynamic concept that explains and describes more or less stable beliefs, based on which the individual establishes the source of control of events and his/her own behavior(9).

These include external sources/luck, external sources/others and internal sources. Based on the social learning process, individuals become capable of perceiving the source of origin and control of events they experience. This perception is called locus of control(9).

When one does not perceive reinforcement as being associated with one's own actions, reinforcement is then attributed to chance, luck, fate or otherwise seen to depend on the power of others or is unpredictable given the great complexity of factors involved. When individuals interpret events in such a way, there is a belief in external control. When individuals perceive events (reinforcements) as associated with their own behavior or dependent on their own stable characteristics, there is a belief in internal control(10).

The construct of locus of control is conceived as a multi-dimensional variable. External beliefs can be divided into chance expectations (reinforcement would be determined by luck or fate) and expectations that reinforcement depends on the actions of powerful others (such as family, professors, or physicians). Individuals who believe that powerful others control their lives may act differently from those who believe that events in their lives occur in a chaotic and unpredictable manner(11).

The concept of locus of control was applied in the health field in the 1990s by Wallston, who developed instruments to evaluate to what extent individuals conceived of their health condition or disease being controlled by themselves, fate, or others(12).

In relation to other psychosocial aspects, in clinical practice it is observed that self-confident patients are more easily convinced to adopt healthy behavior. Self-esteem is considered an association between self-confidence and self-respect and reflects on the individual's ability to understand and deal with challenges and is revealed through feelings and behavior. Identifying such characteristics in DM patients may clarify to the health team the extent to which an individual is prepared to deal with the diagnosis and treatment of a degenerative and incurable disease. Information concerning the self-esteem of patients may become a tool for the team to implement education on diabetes, since the treatment is mainly implemented by patients themselves(13).

Studies addressing health-related locus of control and the self-esteem of DM patients are not currently found, which justifies the implementation of this study. This study intends not only to relate the clinical characteristics of DM patients but also to take into account the subjective element of managing the disease. Identification of health-related locus of control and self-esteem may become essential tools to guide health actions directed to DM patients in order to provide important support for a better understanding of the psychosocial factors involved in the difficulties faced during the management of this chronic disease.

 

OBJECTIVES

• Verify health-related locus of control and self-esteem in DM2 patients;

• Evaluate the relationships among socio-demographic, clinical, risk factors and DM2 chronic complications and the scores obtained on the locus of control and self-esteem scales.

 

METHOD

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at the League of Diabetes Control Endocrinology Outpatient Clinic of the Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo, Medical School. A convenience sample composed of 65 DM2 patients undergoing treatment was interviewed from April to August 2005.

The following variables were analyzed:

• Socio-demographic: age, gender, marital status, schooling and occupation.

• Clinical and Risk Factors: time of diagnosis, treatment (diet, oral medication, medication by injection), results from the latest glycated hemoglobin exam, smoking, alcohol, exercise, body mass index (BMI), presence of hypertension and dyslipidemia.

• DM chronic complications: macro and microangiopathic complications.

• Psychosocial variables measured through the three dimensions of the health locus of control and self-esteem scales.

This study's data were collected using three instruments. The first is a form addressing socio-demographic and clinical information, risk factors and chronic complications. The second instrument was the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale (MHLC), translated and validated for Portuguese(9). The instrument validation, after its application in four samples, was verified by its reliability (internal consistency) through Crombach's alpha with the following values for the subscales: internal from 0.62 to 0.71; external-chance 0.51 to 0.78; and external-powerful others from 0.62 to 0.67. The scale is composed of these three subscales and each contains six items that refer to the dimensions: internal (items 1, 6, 8, 12, 13 and 17), whose scores record the extent to which the individual believes s/he is the one controlling her/his health state; powerful other-external (items 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 and 18) whose scores records the extent to which the individual believes other people or entities (physician, nurse, friend, family member, God, etc) control her/his health condition; and 'external-chance' (items 2, 4, 9, 11, 15 and 16), whose scores indicate the extent to which the individual believes her/his health is controlled by chance, without the interference of other people or him/herself(9). Scores from each dimension range from 1 to 5: totally agree (5), partially agree (4), undecided (3), partially disagree (2) totally disagree (1). The score obtained from the dimensions is the sum of items in that subscale. The sum of the values of the items belonging to each of the three subscales represent the total scores in relation to that dimension of health locus. The total score obtained in each subscale ranges from 6 and 30: the higher the score, the higher the belief in that specific dimension. The scale is presented as a single document and subscales items are intercalated(9).

The third instrument was the Feeling of Self-esteem Scale created from a set of items that originated from several scales traditionally used for measuring self-esteem. This scale, after statistical treatment, gave origin to a final version composed of 15 items that presented the highest correlation coefficients and that was best adapted to the author's objective for the study(14). Responses to the instrument consist of agree and disagree for each statement. A score of one is attributed to the answer agree and zero is attributed to the answer disagree. Scores are summed and the maximum possible score is 15 while the minimum possible score is zero. The higher the score is, the higher the feeling of self-esteem.

The researcher herself collected data using these instruments from patients with consultations scheduled for the dates of collection, before and after appointments. Clinical data were obtained from the patients' medical files.

Free and informed consent forms were read and signed by the participants. The researchers made the commitment to return the analyzed results to the participants and to the involved institution. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of São Paulo, Nursing School.

The following statistical tests were used in data analysis: Person's Chi-square test was used for obtaining absolute (N) and relative (%) frequencies, which determined that the distribution deviated from 5%, specifically, p <0.05. Comparison between the two groups was carried out through the Mann-Whitney test while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used when there were more than two groups. For the continuous and semi-continuous variables Spearman's correlation test was employed.

 

RESULTS

The socio-demographic characteristics of the study sample are presented in Table 1.

 

 

Life habits and risk factors that can influence the health state of individuals such as smoking, alcohol, exercise and the intensity of exercise were also verified. As observed in Table 2, most of the individuals did not smoke or drink alcohol. Most individuals did not exercise, though an expressive percentage practiced mild exercise (about 30 minutes daily). In addition to DM, (49/75) of the participants also had systemic hypertension and 39/60 had dyslipidemia; (34/52) of the patients had chronic complications due to the disease; the frequency of macroangiopathy was 26.1% and microangiopathy was 38.4%.

 

 

The possible scores for the self-esteem scale range from 0 to 15. The higher the score is, the higher the individual's self-esteem; 70.8% of the individuals in the studied sample obtained high scores. The scores obtained in each scale were compared with the variables of interest.

Table 3 presents the significant values found among the variables of interest.

 

 

No differences were found among the groups (p=0.11) in the comparison between internal and gender, according to the Mann-Whitney test. The same results were found with the dimension external-powerful others (p=0.37). A statistically significant relation was found in the comparison between external-chance and gender, that is, women scored higher in this dimension than men. It shows that women had the perception that events they experienced depended on chance.

No statistical differences were found in the comparison between marital status and the locus of control and self-esteem scales. The comparison between self-esteem and schooling did not present statistical significance, though increased self-esteem was proportional with an increased level of schooling.

No significant associations were found in relation to the DM patients' type of treatment and their perception concerning the control of disease. Patients who used a combination of oral and injected medication scored high in the internal and chance dimensions, though this result was not significant. Self-esteem compared with treatment did not present a statistical significance.

Even though no statistical significance was found, smokers obtained lower scores in the dimension 'external-chance' and non-smokers scored higher in the internal dimension. Smoking DM2 patients obtained higher scores in self-esteem than non-smokers (p=0.06).

Those who consumed alcohol obtained higher scores in the internal and external-powerful others dimensions, even though no statistical significance was found. Similar to smokers, individuals who drank alcohol presented slightly higher self-esteem than those who did not drink alcohol.

Significant results were obtained in relation to exercise. Individuals who exercised obtained higher scores in both the dimensions internal and powerful others (p= 0.02 and p=0.01 respectively) while those who did not exercise obtained higher scores in the dimension external-chance (p=0.004). The self-esteem of individuals who exercised and who did not exercise did not differ. Individuals who exercised scored slightly higher in self-esteem but no statistical significance was found.

In relation to the presence of hypertension among DM2 patients, both hypertensive and normotensive individuals obtained high scores in the internal dimension though the results were not statistically significant. No statistically significant relationship was found between hypertension and self-esteem in this sample.

Dyslipidemia was not related to locus of control for health nor was self-esteem. Patients with chronic complications scored lower in the dimension external-chance. Chronic complications were not associated with patient self-esteem.

 

 

A good correlation was found in relation to the time of diagnosis reported by patients and the internal dimension of locus of control, that is, the longer the time of diagnosis, the greater the perception of these individuals of having internal control.

 

 

Comparison between the last result of glycated hemoglobin and the dimensions of locus of control revealed there is a negative relation between 'external-powerful others' and the value of HBAc1. That is, the worse the glycemic control obtained by patients, the less patients attribute the control of their health to others or deities.

 

DISCUSSION

Most of the 65 outpatients with DM2 who composed this study's sample were women (63.1%): 41 patients were an average age of 61 years old. It is known that the prevalence of chronic diseases such as DM is high among elderly individuals(15).

Self-esteem scores obtained by the study's sample are similar to another study that found high scores for self-esteem as a result of a program encouraging DM2 patients to exercise(16).

Women scored higher in external-chance, that is, they attributed control of their disease to chance, which may negatively affect DM control.

No relation was found between socio-demographic or clinical characteristics and locus of control either in women or men, which is a different result from another study that demonstrated that women scored higher in the internal dimension when gender was related to the disease, due to women's multiple social roles and depression(17). Internally-oriented women have a greater predisposition to happiness and increased self-esteem even if they play several social roles such as mother and worker(17).

Most of the interviewees were married (61%), had a professional activity (66.1%), and had not completed primary school (55.4%). Most of the interviewees' had low levels of education. No significant association was found between schooling and locus of control.

Individuals who exercise scored higher in internality and those who did not exercise scored higher in the dimension external-powerful others. Comparison between the last result of glycated hemoglobin and the dimensions of locus of control revealed a negative relationship between external-powerful others and the HbAc1 value. Hence, the higher the HbAc1 result (indicating worse glycemic control), the less the patients attribute the control of their health to other individuals or deities.

Time since diagnosis in patients was an average of 15 years; more than 70% of the patients presented glycated hemoglobin of 8% or more. Most of the patients used a combination of oral and injected medication, which indicates this population had inadequate management of their disease; their control values were above what is expected to avoid complications(16).

A good correlation was found in relation to the time of diagnosis reported by patients and the internal dimension of locus of control. As the time since diagnosis increased, so did the patients' perception of internality in the control of their experiences.

Statistically significant correlations were found between internality with time since diagnosis and exercise; between external-powerful others with glycated hemoglobin and exercise; and between external-chance and exercise.

 

CONCLUSION

Evaluating locus of control and self-esteem may become essential tools to guide health actions directed to DM patients because such information can support a better understanding of the psychosocial factors involved in the difficulties one has in managing this chronic disease.

This study's results revealed that participants scored high on the self-esteem scale despite their health disorders and unfavorable conditions related to clinical and socio-demographic conditions.

Statistically significant relationships were found between the internal dimension with time since diagnosis and exercise; between external-powerful others with glycated hemoglobin and exercise; and between external-chance and exercise.

The limited sample size may have contributed to the reduced significance obtained in most comparisons. Yet, this study's results agree with those found in the limited literature available that addresses the theme. The replication of this study with a larger number of participants is suggested.

 

REFERENCES

1. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Políticas Públicas. Plano de Reorganização da Atenção à Hipertensão Arterial e ao Diabetes Mellitus: fase de detecção de casos suspeitos de DM. Rev Saúde Pública. 2001;35(5):490-3.         [ Links ]

2. Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes. Atualização Brasileira sobre Diabetes [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro; 2006 [citado 2008 dez. 8]. Disponível em: http://www.diabetes.org.br        [ Links ]

3. Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes. Tudo sobre diabetes [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro; 2008 [citado 2008 dez. 8]. Disponível em: http://www.diabetes.org.br        [ Links ]

4. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33 Suppl 1:S62-9.         [ Links ]

5. The Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-86.         [ Links ]

6. UKPDS Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Cost effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):720-6.         [ Links ]

7. Grossi SAA. Educação para o controle do diabetes mellitus. In: Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Social; Universidade de São Paulo. Programa de Saúde da Família. Manual de enfermagem. São Paulo; 2001. p.155-67.         [ Links ]

8. Grossi SAA. Avaliação de dois esquemas de monitorização domiciliar em pacientes com diabetes mellitus do tipo 1 [tese doutorado]. São Paulo: Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo; 1999.         [ Links ]

9. DeLa Coleta JA, DeLa Coleta MF. Escala para Locus de Controle em Saúde. Escalas para medida de atitudes e outras variáveis psicossociais. Ribeirão Preto: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo; 1996.         [ Links ]

10. Rotter JB. Internal versus external controlo reiforcement: a case history of a variable. Am Psichol.1990;45(4):489-93.         [ Links ]

11. Levenson H. Activism and powerful others: distinctions within the concept of internal-external control. J Pers Assess. 1974;38(4):377-83.         [ Links ]

12. Wallston KA. Hocus-pocus, the focus isn't strictly on locus: rotter's social learning theory modified for health. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16(2):183-99.         [ Links ]

13. Rodrigues ACS, Vieira GLC, Torres HC. A proposal of continuing health education to update health team professionals in diabetes mellitus. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2010 Apr 15];44(2):531-7. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v44n2/en_41pdf        [ Links ]

14. DeLa Coleta JA, DeLa Coleta MF. Escala para medida do sentimento de autoestima. Escalas para medida de atitudes e outras variáveis psicossociais. Ribeirão Preto: Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo, 1996.         [ Links ]

15. Costa AA, Almeida Neto JS. Manual de diabetes. 4ª ed. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2004.         [ Links ]

16. Martins DM, Duarte MFS. Efeito do exercício físico sobre o comportamento da glicemia em indivíduos diabéticos. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 1998;3(3):32-44.         [ Links ]

17. Shah ZC, Huffman FG. Depression among Hispanic women with type 2 diabetes. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(4):685-90.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence addressed to:
Sonia Aurora Grossi
Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 419 - Cerqueira César
CEP 05403-000 - São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received: 22/07/2009
Approved: 04/11/2010