SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 issue1Notes on oil sources for the bee genus Caenonomada(Hymenoptera, Apidae, Tapinotaspidini) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Entomologia

Print version ISSN 0085-5626On-line version ISSN 1806-9665

Rev. Bras. entomol. vol.53 no.1 São Paulo  2009

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262009000100034 

SHORT COMMUNICATION

 

Color preference of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera, Tephritidae)

 

Preferência de cor por Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera, Tephritidae)

 

 

Guillermo López-Guillén, Armando Virgen & Julio C. Rojas

Departamento de Entomología Tropical, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula, Chiapas, CP 30700, Mexico. glopez@ecosur.mx

 

 


ABSTRACT

The color preference of A. obliqua was evaluated in two-choice tests. The results showed that both sexes were attracted to wavelengths ranging from 340 nm to 670 nm, although the broad major peak of attraction occurred between 380 and 570 nm.

Keywords: Behavior; fruit fly; olfactometer.


RESUMO

A preferência de cor por A. obliqua foi avaliada em testes de dupla escolha. Os resultados mostraram que ambos os sexos foram atraídos aos comprimentos de onda que variam de 340 nm a de 670 nm, embora o principal pico da atração de A. obliqua tenha ocorrido entre 380 e 570 nm.

Palavras-chave: Comportamento; mosca-das-frutas; olfatômetro.


 

 

The West Indian fruit fly, Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart), is considered a pest of several economically important fruit crops (Enkerlin et al. 1989). The most common host of this species is the hogplum fruit (Spondias spp.), although its principal economic damage occurs in mango (Mangifera indica L.), sapodilla (Achras zapota L.) and guava (Psidium guajava L.) (Hernández-Ortiz 1992). This fruit fly has been recorded from the USA (Florida and Texas) to South America, including the Caribbean Islands (Hernández-Ortiz & Aluja 1993).

Tephritid fruit flies use visual and chemical cues to seek and assess habitat, food, mating sites and ovipositional resources (Economopoulos 1989). Several studies have examined the response of tephritids to models of different shape, size and color (Katsoyannos 1989; Epsky & Heath 1998). The results obtained by these studies have allowed the design of more effective traps for monitoring tephritid populations. In the case of A. obliqua little is known about its visual ecology (López-Guillén 2008). The aim of this work was to determine the preference of A. obliqua to different wavelengths of light under laboratory conditions. The information obtained could eventually allow the improvement of traps used for monitoring A. obliqua.

Fruit flies used in this study were obtained as pupae from the Moscafrut mass-rearing facility in Metapa de Domínguez, Chiapas, Mexico. The insects were sexed after adult emergence and maintained as reported by López-Guillén (2008). The color preference of 8 to 12-d-old males and females was evaluated in two-choice tests. The flies were exposed to two wavelengths of equal quanta flux of 0.1 ìA and 2.3 mV measured with microammeter (Master® Mod. MAS830L) in a T-tube olfactometer similar to that described by Brown et al. (1998). The olfactometer consisted of a T-shaped glass tube with an internal diameter of 20 mm. The main arm of the apparatus was 300 mm long with a side arm 50 mm long placed at the centre. The main arm was divided into three equal 100 mm sectors and secured horizontally to a wooden base. Bandpass filters of 20 nm (Andover Corp., NH) were placed at the ends of the main arm. The light was provided by two illuminators with optical fiber (Fiber-Lite PL-750, Dolan-Jenner Industries, MA), one at each end, equipped with a halogen lamp of 150 W (Osram, Mexico City). The bioassays were performed in a darkroom so that the only sources of light consisted of the two light sources at each end of the main arm.

During each bioassay, one end of the chamber was illuminated with a control wavelength (570 nm), to which most insects possess photoreceptors (Briscoe & Chittka 2001), and the other by one of 14 wavelengths between 340-670 nm, chosen in random order. A fly chosen at random was introduced into the side arm of the olfactometer, which was then sealed with hyaline plastic film (Great Value, Mexico City). Then, the lights were turned off and the olfactometer was covered with a black box. After 5 min, the position of the fly inside the olfactometer was recorded. The position of the filters was reversed after five replicates. The olfactometer was washed out periodically with water and acetone, and dried in an oven at 100°C for at least 30 min to remove any traces left by the insects. In total, 10 replications per sex were performed for each wavelength. The flies were used only once. During the experiments, the temperature and relative humidity in the bioassay room were maintained at 25 ± 2°C and 60 ± 10% RH, respectively.

The data regarding the preference of female and male A. obliqua was analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Fly response to the different wavelengths and control wavelength were analyzed using a log likelihood ratio test (G-test) for goodness-of-fit with Williams' correction.

The tests showed that there was no sexual difference in the response of A. obliqua to the different wavelengths tested (F = 0.0002; df = 1, 278; P = 0.989) (Fig. 1). Both sexes were attracted to wavelengths between 380 and 570 nm. In all cases, the attraction was different between wavelength treatment and wavelength control (P < 0.05) (Table I), with the exception of the 540 nm wavelength (P > 0.05). In contrast, flies were not attracted to wavelengths ranging between 340 and 370 nm, and from 590 to 670 nm, in these cases the response was lower than the wavelength control (P < 0.05) (Table I and Fig. 1).

 

 

 

 

The relative attraction of A. obliqua females and males was similar, ranging from 340 nm and 670 nm. The broad major peak of A. obliqua attraction occurred between 380 and 570 nm, this range corresponds to ultraviolet (UV) and visible spectrum light. Within the visible spectrum, the wavelengths preferred by A. obliqua correspond to violet, blue, green and yellow. Similar tendencies have been observed in Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) to monochromatic light stimuli from ultraviolet (350 nm) to red (675 nm) wavelengths, with the peak of response occurring from 380 to 570 nm (blue-green to yellow), with a plateau from 600 to 625 nm (orange-red) (Agee 1985). In Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), the plateau response occurred between 350 and 490 nm (Wu et al. 2007). Laboratory and field studies have shown that A. ludens is attracted to yellow and green (Robacker et al. 1990; Robacker 1992), whereas A. suspensa showed a preference for orange (580 - 590 nm) (Greany et al. 1978).

Both sexes of A. obliqua were attracted to UV wavelength. A similar situation has been reported for other tephritids such as R. pomonella and B. dorsalis (Agee 1985; Wu et al. 2007). In nature the surface wax of several fruits reflects UV light (Willson & Whelan, 1989), which may partly explain the attraction of tephritids to host fruits (Drew et al. 2003). From a practical point of view our results suggest that the addition of the UV component on traps could improve their efficiency in capturing A. obliqua, such as has been demonstrated with B. dorsalis, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera cacuminata (Hering) (Drew et al. 2003; Wu et al. 2007).

In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrated that both sexes of A. obliqua were similarly attracted to wavelengths ranging from 340 nm to 670 nm, although the broad major peak of attraction occurred between 380 and 570 nm.

Acknowledgments. This work was supported by CONACyT through a grant (integral support for doctoral thesis) and a scholarship to G.L.G.

 

REFERENCES

Agee, H. R. 1985. Spectral response of the compound eye of the wild and laboratory-reared apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 2: 147-154.         [ Links ]

Briscoe, A. D. & L. Chittka. 2001. The evolution of color vision in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 46: 471-510.         [ Links ]

Brown, P. E; C. P. Frank; H. L. Groves & M. Anderson. 1998. Spectral sensitivity and visual conditioning in the parasitoid wasp Trybliographa rapae (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 88: 239-245.         [ Links ]

Drew R. A. I.; R. J. Prokopy & M. C. Romig. 2003. Attraction of fruit flies of the genus Bactrocera to colored mimics of host fruit. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 107: 39-45.         [ Links ]

Economopoulos, A. P. 1989. Use of traps based on color and/or shape. In: Robinson, A. S.; Hooper, G. (ed.). Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Volume 3B. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 447 p.         [ Links ]

Enkerlin, D.; L. García R. & F. López M. 1989. Pest status: Mexico, Central and South America. In: Robinson, A. S.; Hooper, G. (ed.). Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Volume 3A. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 372 p.         [ Links ]

Epsky, N. D. & R. R. Heath. 1998. Exploiting the interactions of chemical and visual cues in behavioral control measures for pest tephritid fruit flies. Florida Entomologist 81: 273-282.         [ Links ]

Greany, P. D.; A. K. Burditt Jr.; H. R. Agee & D. L. Chambers. 1978. Increasing effectiveness of visual traps for the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae), by use of fluorescent colors. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 23: 20-25.         [ Links ]

Hernández-Ortiz, V. 1992. El género Anastrepha Schiner en México (Diptera: Tephritidae): Taxonomía, distribución y plantas hospederas. Instituto de Ecología, A. C. y Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología. Publ. No. 33. Xalapa, Veracruz, México. 162 p.         [ Links ]

Hernández-Ortiz, V. & M. Aluja. 1993. Listado de especies del género neotropical Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) con notas sobre su distribución y plantas hospederas. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 88: 89-105.         [ Links ]

Katsoyannos, B. I. 1989. Response to shape, size and color. In: Robinson, A. S.; Hooper, G. (ed.). Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Volume 3A. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 372 p.         [ Links ]

López-Guillén, G. 2008. Estímulos visuales y químicos como potenciales atrayentes de Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ph. D. dissertation, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco, Mexico. 118 p.         [ Links ]

Robacker, D. C. 1992. Effects of shape and size of colored traps on attractiveness to irradiated, laboratory-strain Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 75: 230-240.         [ Links ]

Robacker, D. C.; D. S. Moreno & D. A. Wolfenbarger. 1990. Effects of trap color, height, and placement around trees on capture of Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 412-419.         [ Links ]

Willson, M. F. & C. J. Whelan. 1989. Ultraviolet reflectance of fruits of vertebrate-dispersed plants. Oikos 55: 341-348.         [ Links ]

Wu, W. Y., Y. P. Chen & E. C. Yang. 2007. Chromatic cues to trap the oriental fruit, Bactrocera dorsalis. Journal of Insect Physiology 53: 509-516.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received 01/10/2008; accepted 22/12/2008

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License