SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue5Orchid growth and nutrition in response to mineral and organic fertilizersRice grown in nutrient solution with doses of manganese and silicon author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

On-line version ISSN 1806-9657

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo vol.34 no.5 Viçosa Sept./Oct. 2010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832010000500015 

SEÇÃO IV - FERTILIDADE DO SOLO E NUTRIÇÃO DE PLANTAS

 

Emission of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide from semi-arid tropical soils in Chiapas México(1)

 

Emissões de óxido nitroso e dióxido de carbono em solos tropicais semiáridos de Chiapas - México

 

 

Alejandro Ponce-MendozaI; Juan Manuel Ceballos-RamírezI; Federico Gutierrez-MicelliII; Luc DendoovenI

ILaboratory of Soil Ecology, GIB, Cinvestav, Ciudad de México, México
IIInstituto Tecnológico de Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Carr. Panamericana km. 1080, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas

Corresponding author

 

 


SUMMARY

The semi-arid region of Chiapas is dominated by N2 -fixing shrubs, e.g., Acacia angustissima. Urea-fertilized soil samples under maize were collected from areas covered and uncovered by A. angustissima in different seasons and N2O and CO2 emissions were monitored. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of urea and of the rainy and dry season on gas emissions from semi-arid soil under laboratory conditions. Urea and soil use had no effect on CO2 production. Nitrons oxide emission from soil was three times higher in the dry than in the rainy season, while urea fertilization doubled emissions. Emissions were twice as high from soil sampled under A. angustissima canopy than from arable land, but 1.2 lower than from soil sampled outside the canopy, and five times higher from soil incubated at 40 % of the water-holding capacity (WHC) than at soil moisture content, but 15 times lower than from soil incubated at 100 WHC. It was found that the soil sampling time and water content had a significant effect on N2O emissions, while N fertilizer and sampling location were less influent.

Index-terms: Acacia angustissima, denitrification, nitrification, soil water content, urea.


RESUMO

A região semiárida de Chiapas é dominada por árvores fixadoras de N2 do tipo Acacia angustissima. Foram analisadas amostras de solos daquela região cultivados com milho, as quais foram coletadas em zonas sob cobertura e em regiões não cobertas por A. angustissima em diversas épocas do ano, às quais foi adicionada ureia. As emissões de N2O e CO2 foram monitoradas. A finalidade deste trabalho foi determinar o efeito da uréia, nas épocas secas e de chuvas, sobre as emissões de gases dos solos semiáridos, em condições de laboratório. O solo e a ureia não tiveram efeito na produção de CO2. As emissões de NO2 foram três vezes maiores no solo recolhido na época seca do que no solo recolhido na época úmida, e a adição de ureia duplicou essas emissões. O solo sob a cobertura de A. angustissima apresentou emissões de NO2 duas vezes superiores às do solo arável, porém 1,2 vez inferior à de solo colhido em zonas não cobertas por A. angustissima. Essas emissões foram cinco vezes maiores em solos incubados a 40 % da capacidade de retenção de água (CRA) do que em solo úmido, mas 15 vezes mais baixas do que em solo incubado a 100 % CRA. Foi perceptível que a época de amostragem e o teor em água do solo tiveram efeito nas emissões de NO2, enquanto o uso de fertilizantes nitrogenados e o local de amostragem tiveram efeito menor.

Termos de indexação: Acacia angustissima, desnitrificação, nitrificação, teor de água do solo, ureia.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Human activities have a large-scale impact on climate, but it is still largely unknown to what extent (Feddema et al., 2005). Although the impact of land use and land cover on the global average surface albedo (biogeophysical effect) and on the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) has been included in international climate change assessments (IPCC, 2001), less attention has been paid to the role of land use change and differences in regional temperatures, precipitation, vegetation and other climate variables, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions (Pielke, 2005; Keppler et al., 2006).

Approximately 43 % of the continental crust is arid and semi-arid characterized by erratic rainfall, and of these 14 % are tropical savannas and grasslands (FAO, 1997). These regions comprise 13 % of the total global C pool (330 Pg C), whereas the net primary production of C is 30 % (17.7 Pg C per year) (Janzen, 2004). Fifty percent of Mexico is arid and semi-arid, mostly in the North of the country (WRI, 2006). However, particular geographical characteristics also determine semi-arid regions in the centre and South of the country. In Chiapas, bordering Guatemala, the main dry area is found in the Central Depression (Chiapas), covering 9,000 km2 (Reyes-García & Sausa, 1997). The natural vegetation, dominated by N2-fixing shrubs such as A. angustissima, is regularly cleared for agriculture. The main traditional cultivation technique used by resource-poor farmers in this area is shifting cultivation agriculture (slash-and-burn) with little application of N, mainly in form of cattle and goat manure, resulting in low yields (Parra-Vázquez et al., 1989). The use of fertilizer in the regions has increased with the population increase and the change of agriculture techniques (Sagarpa, 2006). In the Central Depression, farmers use urea at low rates because it is cheap (IFA, 2006). The intermittent heavy rain leads to erosion of cultivated land, leaving only shallow soils above the rock. The soil is thus easily saturated, inducing anaerobiosis, which in turn triggers denitrification, the most important source of N2O, a known greenhouse gas (Bouwman, 1990).

Different factors regulate N2O emission, such as soil water content, temperature, aeration, ammonium and nitrate concentrations, the amount of mineralizable C and pH (Tiedje, 1988; Bouwman, 1990) so it is highly variable over time. Water-logged soil inhibits O2 diffusion to microorganisms, thus creating an environment favorable for denitrification. This is the main biological process by which N returns to the atmosphere from the soil and the principal pathway by which the environmental pollutant N2O enters the atmosphere (Bouwman, 1990). Emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) from arid and semi-arid regions and the factors affecting it need to be considered when discussing the global gas balances (Squires, 1998) or when defining strategies to mitigate GHG production. GHG emissions from semi-arid soils are lower than from wetlands and agricultural lands, but arid and semiarid ecosystems occupy nearly 45 % of the land surface of the Earth, so their contribution to the overall output is extremely important (FAO, 1997; McLain & Martens, 2006). There is however little information about GHG emissions from semi-arid regions (Wulf et al., 1999) and even less about their contribution from tropical semi-arid regions of Mexico, in spite of covering approximately 1 × 106 km2 (Solis & Campo, 2004). In view of the little information available about factors affecting CO2 and N2O emissions from semi-arid soils, the CO2 and N2O emissions from soil of the Central Depression in Chiapas (Mexico) were investigated under laboratory conditions. Around 25 % of the semi-arid ecosystems are dominated by N2-fixing shrubs of the genera Acacia and Prosopis (Argaw et al., 1999; Geesing et al., 2000). A. angustissima is one of the N2-fixing shrubs that often colonize eroded soil in the Central Depression of Chiapas. Soil was sampled from arable land, but also in the less fertile parts of the Central Depression under A. angustissima, a native N2-fixing shrub dominant, and outside its canopy, while CO2 and N2O emissions were monitored in an aerobic incubation. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of land use, sampling time (dry or rainy season), and of urea and water on the N2O and CO2 emissions in semi-arid soils of the Central Depression.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sampling site

The sampling sites were located in Copoya, a village in Chiapa de Corzo in the South East of Tuxtla Gutiérrez, State of Chiapas (Mexico) (16 º 38 ´ - 16 º 40 ´ N and 93 ° 02 ' - 93 º 04 ´ W) in the Central Depression (Figure 1). The Central Depression is an area of ca. 9,000 km2, with a moderately rugged terrain at 380-1,240 m asl, where agriculture is the main activity (Reyes-García & Sausa 1997; Ferrusquía-Villafranca et al., 2000). The mean annual temperature is 27-30 ºC and the average annual precipitation 400 mm, normally not exceeding 600 mm. Rains are concentrated from June through November and rain outside this period is seldom (SMN, 2006). Large amounts of metamorphic rock fragments and some quartz can be found on the soil surface (Ferrusquía-Villafranca et al., 2000). Rocks protect the soil surface and reduce raindrop impact and surface sealing (Abrahams & Parson, 1991), but limit agricultural activity. Around 50 % of the surface is rock and the thin soil is predominantly Lithosol, 5-15 cm deep. The region is dominated by short-tree savannah and thorn woodland (Breedlove, 1978), dominated by A. angustissima (Timbre) and Byrsonimia crassifolia (Nanche), Swietenia macrophylla (Caobilla), Bucida macrostachya (Cacho de toro), Opuntia spp (Nopal), Acacia farnesiana (Huisache) and bushy old fields or secondary forest (acahuales) can be found in this area (Rzedowski, 1978). Traditionally, Acacia angustissima was used as fuel or for medicinal purposes by local people. Today, these bushes are mixed with agriculture and grasslands in cultivated areas (Rincón-Rosales & Gutiérrez, 2008).

 

 

Soil sampling

Three different sites were selected and three plots were outlined at each site. In this way, nine different soil samples were obtained, i.e. three soil samples from under the A. angustissima trees (UNDER), three from outside the tree canopy (OUT) and three from soil under maize (MAI). The soil was first sampled in the 0-5 cm layer under the canopy of three isolated A. angustissima trees (mean height of 2.5 m) at a distance of 1.5 m from the stem in four randomly selected and pooled perpendicular directions. Secondly, soil was sampled in the 0-5 cm layer outside the canopy of A. angustissima at distances of 2 and 3 m from the stem of the trees sampled before, under the canopy, in the same perpendicular directions. The shrubs at each site grew within an area of ca. 500 m2. Finally, soil was sampled in the 0-5 cm layer from three fields cleared of A. angustissima and other shrubs and growing maize for more than 10 years. The fields were located at less than 2 km from the shrub area. No inorganic fertilizers were applied and maize residues were left on the field, but grazed by cattle and goats. The remaining stover was burned, i.e. a slash-and-burn cultivation. The soil samples from each field were pooled separately for a total of nine samples. Different farmers cultivated each site so that possible effects of cultivation practices could be excluded.

The sampling described above was applied twice, once in April, which is in the dry season and once in August 2004, in the rainy season. In this way, 18 different soil samples were obtained (n=18). Soil was sampled from three different plots at three different locations, i.e. from arable land, and from under and outside the canopy of A. angustissima, in the dry and rainy season.

The percentage of rocks was measured in each plot. Nine quadrants (3 x 3 m) were defined in each sampled plot and the diameter of all rocks (considered round) was measured. Six soil depths were randomly measured in each quadrant.

Experimental set-up and treatments

The soil samples were taken to the laboratory, sieved (< 5 mm) and characterized (Table 1). Forty-eight sub-samples of 15 g dry soil from the 18 soil samples were filled in 120 mL serum glass bottles. To 12 soil samples a solution was added containing 12 mg kg-1 urea-N dry soil to reach a water content of 40 % water-holding capacity (WHC) and to 12 to reach a water content of 100 % WHC. Twelve samples were adjusted to 40 % WHC by adding distilled water and 12 to 100 % WHC. The field water content of 12 other samples, called soil moisture content (SMC), was not altered. Nine 120 mL serum glass bottles were placed in 1000 mL glass jars containing a 20 mL glass tube with 10 mL 1 mol L-1 sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution to trap evolved CO2 and one with 10 mL distilled H2O to avoid soil desiccation. The jars were sealed airtight and incubated. The remaining three serum glass bottles were closed with a Teflon stopper, sealed with an aluminum tear-off seal (20 mm) and the headspace analyzed to determine N2O in the atmosphere. After two hours, i.e. at the beginning and the end of the 0-2 h period, the headspace was analyzed again for N2O.

After one, three and seven days, three jars were randomly selected, opened, the 15 mL glass tube with 1 mol L-1 NaOH removed and stoppered pending analysis. The 120 mL serum glass bottles were closed with a Teflon stopper, sealed with an aluminum tear-off seal (20 mm) and the headspace was analyzed for N2O as described before. In this way, N2O emissions were measured 24 and 26 h after the start of the incubation (24-26 h period), after 72 and 74 h (72-74 h period) and after 168-170 h (168-170 h period). N2O emissions were thus measured in four 2-h intervals, i.e. between 0 and 2 h, between 24 and 26 h, between 72 and 74 h and 168 and 170 h. The headspace of the flasks was analyzed for N2O on an Agilent Technology 4090D gas chromatograph fitted with an electron capture detector (ECD). A HP-PLOT Q 30 m column where the temperature of the detector, injector and oven were 225, 100 and 35 ºC, respectively, was used to separate N2O from the other gases. The flow of the carrier gas N2 was 6 mL min-1. Nitrons oxide dissolved in soil water was determined as described by Moraghan & Buresh (1977).

The cumulative CO2 was measured in the last three flasks, after seven days, for each treatment. The flasks were opened, the tube with 1 mol L-1 NaOH removed and stoppered before analysis.

N2O flux at 100 % WHC

Twelve 15-g sub-samples from the nine soil samples sampled in the rainy and dry season were filled into 120 mL serum glass bottle. To half of the samples (six) a solution containing 12 mg kg-1 urea-N dry soil was added and to the other half distilled water to complete 100 % WHC. The 120 mL serum glass bottles were closed with a Teflon stopper and sealed with an aluminium tear-off seal (20 mm). From half of the flasks of each treatment 12 mL air was taken and 12 mL acetylene (C2H2) injected into the headspace (Yoshinari et al., 1977). The headspace was analyzed in the beginning to determine N2O in the atmosphere and again after 2, 4 and 6 h.

The N2O flux on day zero was calculated using N2O production after 2, 4 and 6 h (C2, C4 and C6 respectively). The flux was measured as described by Hutchinson & Mosier (1981). When the ratio of (C4-C2)/(C6-C2) > 1,

where F is the gas emission rate (ng kg-1 h-1 N2O-N soil), k unit conversion, d gas density (g mL-1) at 273 K and 0.101 MPa pressure, T is the temperature (K) within the bottle, V the headspace of the flask (mL), W the soil weight in the flask (g dry soil), and C the gas concentration ng mL-1 N2O-N in the headspace, and t is 2 h (duration from C2 to C4). The value of d is 1.25 × 10-3 g mL-1 for N2O-N. Gas density was calculated based on the assumption that 1 mol of air occupies a volume of 22.4 L at 273 K and 0.101 MPa.

However, when the gas in the bottle increased (C2 < C4 < C6) or decreased over time (C2 > C4 > C6) and the ratio of (C4-C2)/(C6-C2) < 1, then the flux was calculated as described by Ginting et al. (2003) from the equation:

Where ΔC/Δt is the average rate of concentration variation between C4 - C2 and C6 - C4. The N2O flux in the acetylene (C2H2) treatment, (10 % of headspace) was measured in the same way.

The percentage of N2 produced in each treatment was calculated as:

Soil analysis

The water holding capacity (WHC) was measured in water-saturated soil samples maintained overnight in a funnel capped to avoid evaporation and left to drain freely. WHC was then defined by weight difference. Soil pH was measured in 1:2.5 soil-H2O suspension using a glass electrode (Thomas, 1996). Total C was measured with a Shimatzu Total Organic Carbon Analyzer. Inorganic C in soil was determined by adding 5 mL 0.4 mol L-1 HCl solution to 1 g air-dried soil and trap CO2 evolved in 10 mL 1 mol L-1 NaOH and then titrate it with 0.1 mol L-1 HCl to determine CO2 (Jenkinson & Powlson, 1976). Organic C was defined as the difference between total C and inorganic C. Total N was measured by the Kjeldhal method using concentrated H2SO4, K2SO4 and CuSO4 to digest the sample (Bremner, 1996) and soil particle size distribution by the hydrometer method as described by Gee & Bauder (1986). CO2 in 1 mol L-1 NaOH was determined by titration with 0.1 mol L-1 HCl (Jenkinson & Powlson, 1976).

Statistical analysis

Cumulative CO2 production was subjected to a factorial analysis of variance using R (http://cran.r-project.org/) with urea fertilization (treatment) and the different moisture levels as factors. Significant differences between treatments for the cumulative CO2 production were determined using PROC MIXED (SAS, 1989). The log-transformed N2O emission data were Box-Cox transformed (Crawley, 2008). The N2O values were subjected to factorial analysis of variance using R (http://cran.r-project.org/) with the season, sites, urea fertilization (treatment) and the different moisture levels as factors. The models were simplified until Akaike's Information Criterion values reached a minimum (Crawley, 2008). Soil properties and N2O emission rates from the three sites with three replications were subjected to one-way analysis of variance using PROC GLM (SAS, 1989) to test for significant differences between treatments with Tukey's Studentized Range test.

 

RESULTS

Soil characteristics

The organic C content was greater in arable soil and soil sampled under than outside the canopy of A. angustissima (Table 1). The amount of rocks was 26 % in arable soil, 42 % in soil under A. angustissima and 36 % outside the tree canopy and the mean depth was 6.6, 6.0 and 3.5 cm, respectively.

Cumulative CO2 production rate

Soil moisture content had no significant effect on the cumulative CO2 production rate from arable soil and soil sampled under and outside the canopy of A. angustissima in the rainy season (Figure 2a,b,c). Soil water content, however, had a significant effect on the cumulative CO2 production rate for soil sampled in the dry season (Figure 2d,e,f). It was 3.0 times lower (mean of all treatments) from soil incubated at 100 % WHC and 4.6 times lower for soil at SMC compared to soil incubated at 40 % WHC. Urea fertilization had no significant effect on cumulative CO2 production rate (mean of all treatments) (Figure 2). The cumulative CO2 emission rate from soil incubated at 40 % WHC was 1.3 times higher (mean of all treatments) in the dry than in the rainy season (p < 0.05), but 3.0 times lower from soil at SMC (mean of all treatments). The cumulative CO2 production rate was similar in soil sampled under canopy and from arable soil in the rainy and dry season incubated at 100 % WHC (Figure 2a,b,d,e). It was, however, half as high in the dry as in the rainy season for soil sampled outside the canopy of A. angustissima. Since urea was applied dissolved in water, no treatment was considered of the SMC soil amended with urea.

N2O emission

The N2O emission was significantly affected by season, water content and urea fertilization. N2O emissions were 1.5 times higher in the dry than in the rainy season (p < 0.001). When the soil was adjusted to 100 % WHC, N2O emissions were twice as high as in soil adjusted to 40 % WHC and 4.0 times higher than in soil at SMC (p < 0.001). Urea fertilization increased N2O emissions 1.2 times (p < 0.001). The N2O emission from unamended soil sampled in the dry and rainy season incubated at SMC was low and remained at < 8 ng kg-1 h-1 N2O-N (Table 2). The N2O emission rates were higher for soil sampled in the rainy than in the dry season, except at the start of incubation.

 

 

The N2O emission from soil incubated at 40 % WHC sampled outside the canopy of A. angustissima and from arable soil in the dry season was higher than from soil incubated at SMC (Table 3). It was 233 ng kg-1 h-1 N2O-N from arable soil between 24 and 26 h and 112 ng kg-1 h-1 N2O-N from soil sampled outside the canopy between 0 and 2 h. Productions thereafter were lower and similar to soil sampled in the rainy season.

The N2O emission in the dry season from unamended and urea-fertilized soil incubated at 100 % WHC was highest in the first 0-2 h (Table 4). Emissions remained high from arable soil and outside the canopy between 24 and 26 h, but decreased under the canopy. The N2O emission from soil sampled under and outside the canopy of A. angustissima in the rainy season was higher than in the dry season, but not when sampled from arable land.

The N2O emission was 2.3 times higher from soil sampled under the canopy of A. angustissima compared to soil samples of arable land, but 1.2 lower than from soil sampled outside its canopy. N2O production was 5.0 times higher for soil incubated at 40 %WHC compared to soil incubated SMC, but 14.5 lower than for soil incubated at 100 %WHC. The N2O emission 22-24 h was 5.3 higher than 0-2 h, 10.3 than 72-74 h and 29.8 times than 168-170 h.

N2O flux at 100 % WHC

Acetylene (C2H2) at 10 kPa C2H2 is an inhibitor of the reduction of N2O to N2. This leads to the N2O accumulation as the only end product of the denitrification process. Sampling time and urea fertilization had a significant effect on the N2O flux when C2H2 was added to the headspace, but not the sampling site. The N2O flux in the dry was higher than in the rainy season (Table 5). It was 53, 316 and 146 times higher for soil samples of arable land, under canopy and outside canopy in the dry season compared to soil sampled in the rainy season. In general, urea fertilization increased the fluxes of N2O in both seasons. In the dry and rainy season, urea fertilization more than doubled N2O emission compared to soil with no urea application. The percentage of N2 produced, as a percentage of the emission of N2+N2O, was 70 % from unamended soil and 60 % from soil added with urea for both seasons.

 

DISCUSSION

CO2 production

It is usually assumed that most CO2 released into the atmosphere results from soil degradation in tropical and subtropical land, particularly from deforestation and conversion of forest into cropland and cultivated pastures (Fernández et al., 1997; Neill et al., 1998). Conversion of tropical forests to pasture and agricultural land accelerates the turnover of soil C and N and increases N2O emissions in the short term (Matson & Vitousek, 1990). However, little attention has been paid to soil C and N dynamics in arid or semi-arid regions.

The soil water content at SMC was so low (8 %) that microbial activity was strongly inhibited. Microbial activity is normally considered optimal between 40 % and 60 % WHC (West et al., 1989), and lower water contents inhibit microbial activity (Stark & Firestone, 1995). At higher water contents, anaerobiosis is induced and CO2 emission is reduced, compared to aerobic conditions (Dendooven & Anderson, 1995). Additionally, microorganisms need time to adapt to anaerobiosis, so microbial activity is further reduced in soil sampled in the dry season.

The water content at which the soil sampled in the rainy season was incubated, i.e. SMC, 40 % or 100 % WHC, had no significant effect on CO2 production. The moisture content of the soil at SMC, i.e. 35 %, was high enough for normal microbial activity and microorganisms in soil incubated at 100 % WHC had time to adapt to the high SMC. Additionally, the previous rainfall events must have stimulated soil microbial biomass activity so that most of the available "easily" decomposable organic material had been mineralized at the time of sampling.

Microbial activity for soil sampled in the dry season as evidenced by CO2 production and incubated at 40 % WHC was twice as high as for soil sampled in the rainy season. The microbial activity in the dry season is lower so easily decomposable organic material accumulates in soil. Addition of water stimulated microbial activity and the decomposition of easily decomposable substrate increased CO2 emission.

Soil appeared not to be N-depleted as urea fertilization did not significantly affect CO2 production. Theoretically, the optimum C:N ratio of organic material for microbial growth is 20-30 (van Veen, 1977). As mentioned above, A. angustissima is a N2-fixing shrub and the C:N ratio of the leaves was 20, providing enough N for un-inhibited microbial activity.

N2O emission

In semi-arid regions land use is restricted by erratic rainfall (Reyes-García & Sousa, 1997). Most of the annual precipitation comes from a few rainstorms (Wulf et al., 1999). For instance, strong precipitation (> 20 mm) at the experimental site occurred for only 11 days in 2002 and moderate precipitation (5-20 mm) was recorded on 18 days (SMN, 2006). Less than 5 mm fell in the remaining time. However, these intensive sporadic rainfalls can easily saturate the shallow soil, alter O2 diffusion, microbial activity and consequently N2O emissions.

The O2 diffusion was hampered in soil at 100 % WHC so nitrification-denitrification and denitrification were induced, which led to high N2O emissions (Wrage et al., 2001). The N2O emissions were detected from soil incubated at 40 % WHC, but rates were lower than from soil at 100 % WHC. Soil at 40 % WHC is well-aerated and nitrification-denitrification and denitrification is inhibited, so N2O production occurred mainly through nitrification. However, a high rate of respiratory O2 consumption can result in anaerobic microsites, even at water contents far from saturation as O2 diffusion cannot match consumption (Peterjohn, 1991). Therefore, some part of N2O produced at 40 % WHC can be generated by nitrifiers-denitrification or denitrifiers (Wrage et al., 2001).

Soils in semi-arid regions are often low in available nutrients and microbial activity when dry (Vlek et al., 1981). Sporadic but heavy precipitation (5-20 mm) can easily saturate the shallow soil, alter O2 diffusion, and increase microbial activity and N-mineralization (Sanchez, 1976). Cyclic wetting and drying appears to accentuate denitrification, which strongly correlates with pulses of C and N mineralization in the wet-up period (Groffman & Tiedje, 1988). In this study the highest N2O and N2 production was observed in soils sampled in the dry season incubated at 100 % WHC and amended with urea. The N2 emissions, as a percentage of (N2O+N2) produced, however, were similar in the different treatments. Our data confirm the evidence that on a regional scale, aside from water availability, N availability may limit net primary N2O production in arid and semi-arid ecosystems (Fisher et al., 1988; Gutierrez et al., 1992). Sudden rainfall events rapidly increase the activity of soil organisms thereby stimulating N2O emissions (Freckman et al., 1987: Schwinning & Sala, 2004).

Urea fertilization increases the amount of mineral N present in the soil, stimulating N cycling through various pathways (Williams et al., 1998). In this study, urea application to soil at 100 % WHC increased N2O production, but not at 40 % WHC. At 100 % WHC, denitrification was induced and nitrification was inhibited, but not necessarily absent. Nitrifiers are microaerophilic, so nitrification and denitrification can take simultaneously (Kuenen & Robertson, 1994). NH4+ is oxidized so that NO3- concentrations increase, which are then reduced so N2O emissions increase. Additionally, the nitrifier-denitrification process that occurs in soils with low O2 concentrations also contributes to N2O formation (Wrage et al., 2001). Nitrification is normally the process that most contributes to N2O production at low water contents, although the contribution in the experiment reported here was rather low. Urea applied to the soil is rapidly hydrolyzed and NH4+ concentration increases. NH4+ is then oxidized by nitrifiers so if N2O is formed by nitrification, emissions should increase upon urea application. It appears therefore that even at 40 % WHC, most N2O production occurred through nitrifier-denitrification or denitrification. As mentioned before, despite soil incubation at 40 % WHC under aerobic conditions, anaerobic micro-sites existed resulting in denitrification and/or nitrifier-denitrification and N2O production. Urea application did not increase the amount of anaerobic micro-sites, so N2O production did not increase.

The proportion of denitrification gases entering the atmosphere as N2O and N2 depends on different environmental factors, such as pH, O2 availability and NO3- concentration (Firestone et al., 1980; Arah & Smith, 1990). Independent of the season and sampling area, the ratio N2O(with C2H2):N2O(without C2H2) was on average 3.5 for unamended soil and 2.3 for urea-treated soil on day 0, i.e. urea reduced the percentage of N2 produced. As mentioned above, urea fertilization raises NO3- concentrations even in soil at 100 % WHC, and it is well-known that higher NO3- concentrations in soil increase the N2O:N2 gas ratio (Blackmer & Bremner, 1978; Firestone et al., 1980). Arid regions cover approximately 40 % of the Earth's continental crust and while the estimates for gaseous N emissions from desert ecosystems are relatively low when compared to tropical ecosystems (Davidson & Kingerlee, 1997; Hartley & Schlesinger, 2000), the great extent of arid lands results in the potential for global impacts due to increased N gas losses from these ecosystems (Schlesinger et al., 1990), mainly in soils rewetted to saturated water conditions after the dry season.

 

CONCLUSIONS

In semi-arid regions, such as in the Central Depression of Chiapas, erratic rainfall events control N2O and CO2 emissions. From soils at 40 % WHC, i.e. mostly aerobic, CO2 production was high after moistening. Urea fertilization, on the contrary, had no effect on CO2 emission. Moistening the dry soil had a greater effect on N2O emission than moistening the wet. Organic material and nutrient accumulation and microbial activity are suppressed in the dry soil, but wetting induces a burst in activity resulting in high N2O and CO2 emissions. Moistening stimulates nitrification, and when the soil is wetter nitrifier-denitrification and denitrification thereby increasing N2O emissions. The semi-arid regions cover the major part of the Earth´s continental crust and changes in their use may have a relevant effect on CO2 and N2O emissions and consequently, on greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank C.A. Lecona-Guzman and L. Jiménez-Ruíz for their help with the field work and the Instituto Tecnológico de Tuxtla Guiérrez Chiapas for technical and logistic support. We also thank L. Paolino and B. Pereira for the Portuguese translation. The research was funded by Cinvestav while A.P.M. received grant support from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) Mexico. This study was also benefited by valuable comments and suggestions of the editor and three anonymous reviewers.

 

LITERATURE CITED

ABRAHAMS, A.D. & PARSONS, A.J. Relation between infiltration and stone cover on a semiarid hillslope, southern Arizona. J. Hydrol., 122:49-59, 1991.         [ Links ]

ARAH, J.R.M. & SMITH, K.A. Factors influencing the fraction of the gaseous products of soil denitrification evolved to the atmosphere as nitrous oxide. In: BOUWMAN, A.F., ed. Soils and the greenhouse effect. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1990. p.475-480.         [ Links ]

ARGAW, M.; TEKETAY, D. & OLSSON, M. Soil seed flora, germination and regeneration pattern of woody species in an Acacia woodland of the Rift Valley in Ethiopia. J. Arid Environ., 43:411-435, 1999.         [ Links ]

BLACKMER, A.M. & BREMNER, J.M. Inhibitory effect of nitrate on reduction of N2O to N2 by soil-microoganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem., 10:187-191, 1978.         [ Links ]

BOUWMAN, A.F. Soil and greenhouse effect. New York, Wiley, 1990.         [ Links ]

BREEDLOVE, D.E. The phytogeography and vegetation of Chiapas (Mexico). In: GRAHAM, A., ed. Vegetation and history of Northern Latin America. San Francisco, California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, 1978. p.149-165.         [ Links ]

BREMNER, J.M. Nitrogen total. In: SPARK, D.L., ed. Methods of soil analysis: Chemical methods. Madison, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 1996. Part 3. p.1085-1122.         [ Links ]

CRAWLEY, M.J. The R Book. John Wiley & Sons, ltd. UK, 2008. p.336-338.         [ Links ]

DAVIDSON, E.A. & KINGERLEE, W. A global inventory of nitric oxide emission from soils. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 48, 37-50, 1997.         [ Links ]

DENDOOVEN, L. & ANDERSON, J.M. Use of a 'least-squares' optimization procedure to estimate enzyme characteristics and substrate affinities in the denitrification reactions in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 27:1261-1270, 1995.         [ Links ]

FAO. State of the world's forests. Rome, 1997.         [ Links ]

FEDDEMA, J.J.; OLESON, K.W.; BONAN, G.B.; MEARNS, L.O.; BUJA, L.E.; MEEHL, G.A. & WASHINGTON, W.M. The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science, 310:1674-1678, 2005.         [ Links ]

FERNÁNDEZ, E.C.M.; MONTAVALLI, P.P.; CASTILLA, C. & MUKURUMBIRA, L. Management control of soil organic matter dynamics in tropical land-use systems. Geoderma, 79:49-67, 1997.         [ Links ]

FERRUSQUÍA-VILLAFRANCA, I.; APPLEGATE, S.P. & ESPINOSA-ARRUBARRENA, L. First Paleogene selachifauna of the middle American-Caribbean-Antillean region, La Mesa de Copoya, west-central Chiapas-geologic setting. R. Mexicana Ci. Geol., 17:1-23, 2000.         [ Links ]

FIRESTONE, M.K.; FIRESTONE, R.B. & TIEDJE, J.M. Nitrous-oxide from soil denitrification-factors controlling its biological production. Science, 208:749-751, 1980.         [ Links ]

FISHER, F.M.; ZAK, J.C.; CUNNINGHAM, G.L. & WITHFORD, W.G. Water and nitrogen effects on growth and allocation pattern of creosotebush in the Northern Cihuahuan Desert. J. Range Manag., 41, 387-391, 1988.         [ Links ]

FRECKMAN, D.W.; WHITFORD, W.G. & STEINBERGER, Y. Effect of irrigation on nematode population dynamics and activity in desert soils. Biol. Fert. Soil, 3:3-10, 1987.         [ Links ]

GEE, G.W. & BAUDER, J.W. Particle-size analysis. In: WEBER, R.W.; ANGLE, S.; BOTTOMLEY, P.; BEZDICEK, D.; SMITH, S.; TABATABAI, A. & WOLLUM, A., eds. Methods of soil analysis; Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison, Soil Science Society of America, 1986. Part 1. p.383-409.         [ Links ]

GEESING, D.; FELKER, P. & BINGHAM, R.L. Influence of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) on soil nitrogen and carbon development: Implications for global carbon sequestration. J. Arid Environ., 46:157-180, 2000.         [ Links ]

GINTING, D.; KESSAVALOU, A.; EGHBALL, B. & DORAN, J.W. Greenhouse gas emissions and soil indicators four years after manure and compost applications. J. Environ. Qual., 32:22-32, 2003.         [ Links ]

GROFFMAN, P.M & TIEDJE, J.M. Denitrification hysteresis during wetting and drying cycles in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52:1626-1629, 1988.         [ Links ]

GUTIERREZ, J.R.; AGUILERA, L.E. & ARMESTO, J.J. The effects of water and macronutrients addition on aboveground biomass production of annual plats in an old field from a coastal desert of north-central Chile. R. Chil. Hist. Nat., 65:83-90, 1992.         [ Links ]

HARTLEY, A.E. & SCHLESINGER, W.H. Environmental controls on nitric oxide emission from Northern Chihuahuan desert soils. Biochemistry, 50:279-300, 2000.         [ Links ]

HUTCHINSON, G.L. & MOSIER, A.R. Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 45:311-316, 1981.         [ Links ]

INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION - IFA. Access under: <http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/statistics/>. Access date: 2006.         [ Links ]

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE - IPCC. Climate change 2001. The scientific basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.         [ Links ]

JANZEN, H.H. Carbon cycling in earth systems-a soil science perspective. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 104:399-417, 2004.         [ Links ]

JENKINSON, D.S. & POWLSON, D.S. The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biol. Biochem., 8:167-177, 1976.         [ Links ]

KEPPLER, F.; HAMILTON, J.T.G.; BRASS, M. & RÖCKMANN, T. Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature, 439:187-191, 2006.         [ Links ]

KUENEN, J.G. & ROBERTSON, L.A. Combined nitrification-denitrification processes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 15:109-117, 1994.         [ Links ]

MCLAIN, J.E.T. & MARTENS, D.A. N2O production by heterotrophic N transformations in a semiarid soil. Appl. Soil Ecol., 32:253-263, 2006.         [ Links ]

MATSON, P.A. & VITOUSEK, P.M. Ecosystem approach to a global nitrous-oxide budget. Bioscience, 40:667-671, 1990.         [ Links ]

MORAGHAN, J.T. & BURESH, R. Correction for dissolved nitrous oxide in nitrogen studies. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 41:1201-1203, 1977.         [ Links ]

NEILL, C.; CERRI, C.; MELILLO, J.M.; FEIGL, B.J.; STEWUDLER, P.A.; MORAES, J.F.L. & PICCOLO, M.C. Stocks and dynamics of soil carbon following deforestation for pasture in Rondonia. In: LAL, R.; KIMBLE, J.M.; FOLLET, R.F. & STEWART, B.A., eds. Soil processes and the carbon cycle. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1998. p.9-28.         [ Links ]

PARRA-VÁZQUEZ, M.R.; ALEMÁN-SANTILLÁN, T.; NAHED-TORAL, J.; MERA-OVANDO, L.M.; LÓPEZ-MEJÍA, M. & LÓPEZ-MEZA, A. El subdesarrollo agrícola en los Altos de Chiapas. México, Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, 1989.         [ Links ]

PETERJOHN, W.T. Denitrification: Enzyme content and activity in desert soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 23:845-855, 1991.         [ Links ]

PIELKE R.A. Land use and climate change. Science, 310:1624-1625, 2005.         [ Links ]

REYES-GARCÍA, A. & SAUSA, M. Listado Florístico de México XVII. Depresión Central de Chiapas, la Selva Baja Caducifolia. México, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, 1997.         [ Links ]

RINCÓN-ROSALES, R. & GUTIÉRREZ, F.A. Características biológicas de Acaciella angustissima (mill.) britton & rose en su habitat natural y evaluación de su potencial cortical en chiapas, méxico / Biological characteristics of Acaciella angustissima (mill.) Britton & Rose in its natural habitat and assessment of its bark potential in Chiapas, México. Agrociencia, 42:129-137, 2008.         [ Links ]

R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, 2008. Disponível em: <URL http://www.r-project.org>         [ Links ]

RZEDOWSKI, J. Vegetación de México. Mexico, D.F., Limusa, 1978.         [ Links ]

SECRETARÍA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERÍA Y DESARROLLO RURAL PESCA Y ALIMENTACIÓN - SAGARPA. Access under: <http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx> Access date: 2006.         [ Links ]

SANCHEZ, P.A. Properties and management of soil in the tropics. New York, Wiley, 1976. p.618.         [ Links ]

SAS, Institute Inc. Statistic guide for personal computers. Version 6.04, Edition. Cary: 1989.         [ Links ]

SCHLESINGER, W.H.; REYNOLDS, J.F.; CUNNINGHAM, G.L.; HUENNEKE, L.F.; JARRELL, W.M.; VIRGINIA, R.A. & WHITFORD, W.G. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science, 247:1043-1047, 1990.         [ Links ]

SCHWINNING, S. & SALA, O.E. Hierarchical organization of resource pulse responses in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141:211-220, 2004.         [ Links ]

SERVICIO METEOROLÓGICO NACIONAL - SMN. Access under < http://smn.cna.gob.mx/> Access date: 2006.         [ Links ]

SOLIS, E. & CAMPO, J. Soil N and P dynamics in two secondary tropical dry forests after fertilization. Forest Ecol. Manag.,195:409-418, 2004.         [ Links ]

SQUIRES, V.R. Dryland soils: Their potential as a sink for carbon and an agent in mitigating climate change. In: BLUME, H.P.; EGER, H.; FLEISHHAUER, E.; HEBEL, A.; REIJ, C. & STEINER, K.G., eds. Towards sustainable land use. Reiskirchen: Catena Verlag, 1998. p.209-215. (Advances in Geoecology, 31)        [ Links ]

STARK, J.M. & FIRESTONE, M.K. Mechanisms for soil-moisture effects on activity of nitrifying bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61:218-221, 1995.         [ Links ]

THOMAS, G.W. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: SPARKS, D.L., ed. Methods of soil analysis; Chemical methods. Madison, 1996. Part 3. p.475-490. (SSSA Book Series, 5)        [ Links ]

TIEDJE, J.M. Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, in: ZEHNDER, A.J.B. ed. Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. Wiley, New York, 1988. p.197-244.         [ Links ]

van VEEN, J.A. The behavior of nitrogen in soil.. Wageningen, Nederland, Landbouwhogeschool, 1977. (Tese de Doutorado)        [ Links ]

VLEK, P.L.G.; FILLERY, I.R.P. & BURFORD, J.R. Accession transformation, and loss of nitrogen in soils of the arid region. Plant Soil, 58:133-175, 1981.         [ Links ]

WEST, A.W.; SPARLING, G.P. & SPEIR, T.W. Microbial activity in gradually dried and rewetted soils as governed by water and substrate availability. Austr. J. Soil Res., 27:747-757, 1989.         [ Links ]

WILLIAMS, P.H.; JARVIS, S.C. & DIXON, E. Emission of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide from soil under field and laboratory conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30:1885-1893, 1998.         [ Links ]

WORLD RESOURCE INSTITUTE - WRI. Earth Trends: The Environment Information Portal. Access under: <http://earthtrends.wri.org/> Access date: 2006.         [ Links ]

WRAGE, N.; VELTHOF, G.L.; van BEUSICHEM, M.L. & OENEMA, O. Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide. Soil Biol. Biochem., 33:1723-1732, 2001.         [ Links ]

WULF, S.; LEHMANN, J. & ZECH, W. Emissions of nitrous oxide from runoff-irrigated and rainfed soils in semiarid north-west Kenya. Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 72:201-205, 1999.         [ Links ]

YOSHINARI, T.; HYNES, R. & KNOWLES, R. Acetylene inhibition of nitrous oxide reduction and measurement of denitrification and nitrogen fixation in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 9:177-183, 1977.         [ Links ]

 

 

Corresponding author:
Universidad de la Sierra Juárez
Av. Universidad S/N Ixtlán de Juárez
Oaxaca. México C.P. 68725
Tel: (951) 5536362 Ext. 600
E-mail: jano_ponce@hotmail.com

Received for publication in March 2009 and approved in July 2010.

 

 

(1) Received for publication in March 2009 and approved in July 2010. 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License