Services on Demand
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Print version ISSN 0100-0683
Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo vol.35 no.1 Viçosa Jan./Feb. 2011
DIVISÃO 2 - PROCESSOS E PROPRIEDADES DO SOLO
2.4 - QUÍMICA DO SOLO
New methods to quantify NH3 volatilization from fertilized surface soil with urea*
Métodos para quantificação da volatilização de amônia em solo fertilizado na superfície com ureia
Ana Carolina AlvesI; Patrícia Perondi Anchão OliveiraII; Valdo Rodrigues HerlingIII; Paulo Cesar Ocheuze TrivelinIV; Pedro Henrique de Cerqueira LuzIII; Teresa Cristina AlvesII; Ramon Cellin RochettiV; Waldomiro Barioni JúniorII
IProfessor, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Route MS 306, Km 6, CEP 79450-000 Cassilândia (MS). E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
IIResearcher, EMBRAPA/CPPSE. Post Office Box 339, CEP 13560-970 São Carlos (SP). E-mails: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
IIIProfessor, Department of Animal Science, USP/FZEA. Post Office Box 23, CEP 13630-970 Pirassununga (SP). E-mails: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
IVProfessor, University of São Paulo USP. Center of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture CENA. Post Office Box 96, CEP 13400-970 Piraciacaba (SP). E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
VGraduate student in Animal Science, Statel University Paulista UNESP. Campus de Ilha Solteira. Post Office Box 31, CEP 15385-970 Ilha Solteira (SP)
Gaseous N losses from soil are considerable, resulting mostly from ammonia volatilization linked to agricultural activities such as pasture fertilization. The use of simple and accessible measurement methods of such losses is fundamental in the evaluation of the N cycle in agricultural systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate quantification methods of NH3 volatilization from fertilized surface soil with urea, with minimal influence on the volatilization processes. The greenhouse experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with 13 treatments and five replications, with the following treatments: (1) Polyurethane foam (density 20 kg m-3) with phosphoric acid solution absorber (foam absorber), installed 1, 5, 10 and 20 cm above the soil surface; (2) Paper filter with sulfuric acid solution absorber (paper absorber, 1, 5, 10 and 20 cm above the soil surface); (3) Sulfuric acid solution absorber (1, 5 and 10 cm above the soil surface); (4) Semi-open static collector; (5) 15N balance (control). The foam absorber placed 1 cm above the soil surface estimated the real daily rate of loss and accumulated loss of NH3N and proved efficient in capturing NH3 volatized from urea-treated soil. The estimates based on acid absorbers 1, 5 and 10 cm above the soil surface and paper absorbers 1 and 5 cm above the soil surface were only realistic for accumulated N-NH3 losses. Foam absorbers can be indicated to quantify accumulated and daily rates of NH3 volatilization losses similarly to an open static chamber, making calibration equations or correction factors unnecessary.
Index terms: fertilizer-N, ammonia absorber, 15N, NH3-N loss.
As perdas gasosas de nitrogênio do solo são consideráveis, sendo resultantes principalmente da volatilização de amônia ligada a diversas atividades agropecuárias, como na adubação de pastagens. A utilização de métodos simples e acessíveis para mensurar essas perdas é fundamental na avaliação do ciclo de N nesses sistemas. Assim, o objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar métodos usados para quantificar a NH3 volatilizada da ureia aplicada na superfície do solo, considerando fundamental que tenham mínima interferência no processo de volatilização. O experimento foi conduzido em casa de vegetação, utilizando-se um delineamento experimental inteiramente casualizado, com 13 tratamentos e cinco repetições. Os tratamentos foram: (1) absorvedor de espuma de poliuretano (densidade de 20 kg m-3) contendo solução de ácido fosfórico e colocado a 1, 5, 10 e 20 cm acima da superfície do solo; (2) absorvedor de papel-filtro contendo solução de ácido sulfúrico e colocado a 1, 5, 10 e 20 cm acima da superfície do solo; (3) absorvedor com solução de ácido sulfúrico e colocado a 1, 5 e 10 cm acima da superfície do solo; (4) coletor semiaberto estático; e (5) balanço de 15N (método de referência). O absorvedor de espuma colocado a 1 cm acima da superfície do solo indicou valores reais para a taxa diária de perda e a perda acumulada de N-NH3, sendo eficiente na captação da NH3 volatilizada da ureia aplicada ao solo. Os absorvedores com ácido sulfúrico nas alturas de 1, 5 e 10 cm do solo e os absorvedores de papel nas alturas de 1 e 5 cm do solo apresentaram estimativas reais somente das perdas acumuladas de N-NH3. O absorvedor de espuma é uma câmara estática aberta indicada para quantificar a taxa de perda diária ou a perda acumulada de amônia por volatilização, não sendo necessário o uso de equações de calibração ou fatores de correção.
Termos de indexação: fertilizante nitrogenado, absorvedor de amônia, 15N, perdas de N-NH3.
Pastures constitute the basis of beef cattle production in Brazil. Economically, production systems that use this feed source are highly competitive in comparison with systems based on agroindustrial by-products, cereal grains and silage (Hodgson, 1990). Fertilization is considered the best alternative to increase beef production, since the possibility of increasing pasture area is limited (Balsalobre, 2002).
For the economic viability of pasture-based beef production it is essential to know how to use fertilizers appropriately to intensify pasture productivity. Nowadays, the maximum efficiency of a fertilizer must be directly related to the lowest environmental impact. Nitrogen fertilizers are the most commonly used, the most expensive and have the greatest potential to damage the environment of all fertilizers.
Gaseous N losses are the main cause of inefficiency of N-fertilizers, contributing to the emission of ammonia, molecular N (N2) and N oxides, mainly nitrous oxide, into the atmosphere. Such losses must be understood for an appropriate pasture fertilization management and to rationalize fertilizer use. However, methods used to estimate ammonia volatilization losses are expensive and may alter the environmental conditions near the soil surface, by the presence of a collection chamber, and bias the results (Lara-Cabezas & Trivelin, 1999; Araújo et al., 2009). Due to these difficulties and the high cost of NH3-N losses from pasture systems (Oliveira, 2001; Oliveira et al., 2003, 2007), simple and accessible methods must be developed to evaluate these processes, which are also essential to analyze the N cycle. New methods for the estimation of ammonia volatilization must be calibrated using the 15N isotope balance technique as reference (Lara Cabeza et et al., 1999; Araújo et al., 2009). Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate and calibrate new quantification methods of N-NH3 volatilized from urea-treated soil, with minimal disturbance of the volatilization processes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse of the Department of Animal Science/College of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Pirassununga, SP (21 º 59 ' S, 47 º 26 ' W, 634 m asl).
Soil was sampled in the 0-20 cm layer of a Typic Hapludox (Embrapa, 1999). Soil bulk density was measured by the volumetric ring method (Machado et al., 2005). Lime analysis was performed according to the saturation base method (Quaggio & Raij, 1996), after which soil samples remained incubated during 90 days. At the end of the incubation period the chemical analysis (Machado et al., 2005) indicated pH (CaCl2) of 6.6; K, Ca and Mg concentrations of 1.7, 39 and 14 mmolc dm-3, respectively; CTC of 63 mmolc dm-3; and base saturation (V %) of 87 %. Temperature and relative humidity means in the greenhouse are presented in figure 1.
The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with 13 treatments and five replications. The factors studied were methods of NH3-loss evaluation and distances between the soil surface and NH3-absorbers, by the following methods: (1) Polyurethane foam (density of 20 kg m-3) with phosphoric acid solution absorber (foam absorber) placed 1, 5, 10 and 20 cm above the soil surface; (2) Paper filter with sulfuric acid solution absorber (paper absorber, 1, 5, 10 and 20 cm above the soil surface); (3) Sulfuric acid solution absorber (1, 5 and 10 cm above the soil surface; (4) Semi-open static collector and (5) 15N balance as reference method.
The experiment lasted from August 26 to September 15, 2005. Plastic pots (17 x 20 cm) without holes for water drainage, to avoid N loss by leaching were filled with 4.4 kg of finely ground air-dried soil. Each pot represented a plot and was fertilized with N at a rate corresponding to 100 kg ha-1 N-urea. The pots for the foam, paper absorber and semi-open static collector treatments were fertilized with normal urea, while those for the 15N balance treatment received enriched urea (5 % 15N). The fertilizer was diluted in water and then applied to the soil surface. Absorbers and collectors were placed above the pots according to the treatments, except for the 15N balance treatment, where no absorber or collector was installed.
The foam and paper filters of the absorbers and collectors were changed every two days to determine the volatilized ammonia, totaling 11 samples in a period of 22 days.
The pots placed on benches were protected by transparent plastic curtains to avoid interference of the air flow from the greenhouse exhaust fans with the capture of volatilized ammonia. Soil moisture was maintained at 50 % of the available water content (AWC), approximately. Pots were daily weighed and watered as required.
The foam absorbers (described in Figure 2) consisted of polyurethane (PU) foams (8.0 x 8.0 cm; density 20 kg m-3) soaked with 11 mL of phosphoric acid solution (0.167 mol L-1). They were placed above PVC plates (10.0 x 10.0 x 0.2 cm) and wrapped in a layer of polytetrafluoroethylene tape (PTFE, density 0.25-0.35 g cm-3, thickness 0.050.06 mm), ammonia-permeable and water impermeable. The plates were then installed upside-down above the pots, supported by four plastic rods, maintaining the absorbers at the established distances from the soil surface.
For the paper absorbers, filter paper (8.0 x 8.0 cm) was immersed in 2 mL of H2SO4 solution (5 mol L-1) and the collectors were installed like the foam absorbers.
To prevent contamination with environmental NH3, the absorbers were maintained in plastic bags until installation on the pots. Above each pot one absorber was installed at a specific height, according to the treatment (1, 5, 10 or 20 cm). The PVC plates on the upper side of the absorbers prevented the capture of ammonia present over the collector. After two days, the absorbers were removed, deep-frozen (-18 ºC) in plastic bags and immediately replaced by new absorbers.
At the end of the experimental period, the absorbers were disassembled and components washed with deionized or distilled water. For each absorber, the PVC plate and the PTFE tape were washed with approximately 30 mL of water, using a wash bottle, above the PU foam placed in a Bückner funnel attached to a Kitassato and a vacuum pump. For a complete removal of the acid solution, the foam was washed a second time with distilled or deionized water (approximately 300 mL) in the Bückner-Kitassato apparatus. The solution collected in the Kitassato was then transferred to a Backer and the volume recorded for later calculations. To determine N, 50 mL aliquots were analyzed by the steam distillation and tritation micro-Kjeldahl procedure (Carmo et al., 2005). For the paper absorbers, each paper filter was finely ground in a mortar and mixed in a Backer with the water used to wash the PVC plate and the PTFE tape (approximately 150 mL). A 50 mL aliquot of the solution produced for each absorber was analyzed for N by the micro-Kjeldahl procedure.
The semi-open static collectors used in the experiment had been developed by Nönmik (1973), and adapted by Lara Cabezas et al. (1999). The PU foam pieces were soaked in 30 mL of phosphoric acid solution (0.167 mol L-1) with 5 % glycerin and stored in plastic bags before being placed in the collectors. Foams were removed and replaced every two days until the 22nd day. The foams located on the upper part of the collectors were discarded and those located on the lower part were put in plastic bags, identified and deep-frozen until analysis. To quantify N, each foam was washed with water (400 mL, approximately) in a Bückner-Kitassato vacuum pump system and a 50 mL sample was separated for the micro-Kjeldahl procedure. Due to the usual variations in internal conditions in semi-open static collectors (increase in soil moisture and recycling of vaporized water), which interfere with the natural volatilization process (Lara Cabezas & Trivelin, 1990), calibration equations (Lara Cabezas et al., 1999) were used to express N-NH3 volatilization.
For the 15N balance treatment, N was applied at a rate of 100 kg ha-1 N of enriched urea (5 atom % 15N). After 22 days, samples were taken from each pot, from three layers (0-5, 5-10 and 10-15 cm. A H2SO4 5 mol L-1 solution was sprayed on the surface of each sample, to avoid NH3 volatilization, and the soil dried in a forced-air oven (40 ºC/72 h) for posterior analysis by mass spectrometry (ANCA SL) at the CENA/USP laboratory. The non-enriched soil was also evaluated for natural 15N abundance.
To estimate ammonia volatilization losses, by the 15N balance method, the following aspects were evaluated:
1. N content (g kg-1) and 15N content (atom %) in the soil from the plots - quantified in a mass spectrometer attached to an ANCA-SL analyzer (Europa Scientific Ltda.);
2. N percentage originated by the fertilizer (%SNFF) in the soil, according to the equation: %SNFF = [(a-c)/(b-c)] x 100, where:
a = 15N abundance in the soil (atoms %)
b = 15N abundance in the labeled fertilizer
c = 15N natural abundance in the control soil (without fertilizer)
3. Amount of soil N derived from the fertilizer (ASNFF), according to the equation:
ASNFF (g/pot) = [ %NSPF/100] x Np, where: Np = accumulated N in the soil from the pots (g);
4. Recovery of N applied to the soil
Rec = (ASNFF/QNA) x 100, where: QAN = quantity of N applied
5. Volatilization losses
Losses = 100 Rec.
Data were analyzed by ANOVA and means compared by Tukey's test using SAS software (SAS, 1999). For accumulated NH3-N volatilization the reference method was the 15N balance method. For NH3-N daily volatilization rate, daily values were compared using values from the semi-open static collector method as reference.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Estimates of accumulated loss of volatilized NH3-N based on the semi-open static collector were similar only to estimates obtained by foam absorber 1 cm (FA1) and 15N balance (15N) methods (p < 0.01). No calibration equation or correction factor was necessary to estimate the accumulated loss of volatilized NH3 , as occurred with the results obtained by Araújo et al. (2009) and Lara Cabezas et al. (1999). The use of acid absorbers 1, 5 and 10 cm (AA1, AA5 and AA10) and paper absorbers 1 and 5 cm (PA1 and PA5) above the soil resulted in similar values for accumulated NH3-N compared to 15N balance (p < 0.01) (Table 1). Therefore, the semi-open collector, FA1, AA1, AA5, AA10, PA1, and PA5 estimated the real accumulated NH3-N losses. Manzoni & Trivelin (personal communication) compared the paper absorber and the 15N balance methods observing that the paper absorber 1 cm only estimated real NH3-N losses by volatilization when volatilization was high.
Foam absorbers at 5, 10 and 20 cm (FA5, FA10 and FA20) and the paper absorbers 10 and 20 cm (PA10 and PA20) underestimated N-NH3 volatilization losses. It is possible that part of the volatilized NH3-N was dispersed in the air before reaching the absorbers.
The estimates of accumulated NH3-N losses were similar for FA1, AA1, AA5, AA10, PA1, PA5 and 15N balance methods. However, in order to verify if these methods were able to estimated the real NH3-N volatilization, it would be necessary to compare not only the accumulated values, but the values of the daily NH3-N loss rate with the reference method (15N balance), that is, with the curve of ammonia volatilization rates over time. NH3-N volatilization by the 15N balance method was only evaluated on the last day of the experimental period, so an estimation of the daily rate of ammonia loss by this method was not possible. Nevertheless, the semi-open collector had already been calibrated by the 15N balance method by Lara Cabezas et al. (1999). Consequently, the NH3-N loss values obtained by the semi-open collector were compared statistically with values from the other absorbers for each evaluation day (Figures 3, 4 and 5).
From the 4th to the 10th day after urea application the losses estimated by FA1 were similar to those estimated by the semi-open collector (Figure 3). Losses are considered more relevant during this period. On the 14th and 22nd day, losses estimated by both methods were equal again (p < 0.01).
With FA1 it was possible to obtain the real estimates of the accumulated NH3-N loss by volatilization and the daily rate ammonia loss by volatilization.
Although curves for results by FA5, FA10 and FA20 methods indicated lower NH3-N volatilization values when compared to the semi-open collector, the pattern was the same, with a peak for NH3-N loss on the sixth day. The similarity of these curves indicated that the calibration of these methods with 15N may be possible, as similalry done in the case of the semi-open collector by Lara Cabezas & Trivelin (1999) and Araújo et al., 2009.
Losses estimated by PA1 and PA5 were the same as by the semi-open collector, from the 6th to the 10th day and on the 14th and 22nd day after urea application (Figure 4).
On the 6th, 10th and from the 14th to the 18th day after urea application, the amount of volatilized NH3-N estimated by the semi-open collector method was equal to the AA1 method. Volatilization estimated by AA5 and the semi-open collector was similar from the 8th to the 10th day and from the 14th to the 18th day after urea application (Figure 5). Ammonia volatilization reached maximum values between the 4th and 6th day after urea application, as reported by Lara Cabezas & Trivelin (1990) and Costa et al. (2003).
It was observed that the amounts of lost and captured NH3-N detected by FA1were most similar to those of the semi-open collector, in the 22 days of evaluation. Since estimates of NH3-N volatilization by FA1 and semi-open collector were equal to estimates by the 15N balance method, it is possible to indicate FA1 as an advantageous alternative to the other two methods, mainly because it is less expensive and does not interfere with the natural process of NH3 volatilization from the soil either, as verified by Lara Cabezas & Trivelin (1990) for the semi-open collector.
The evaluation of the FA1 method under field conditions is under way, with a view to quantify ammonia volatilization and foliar emission in pastures.
Polyurethane foam with phosphoric acid solution absorber (foam absorber) installed 1 cm above the soil surface is efficient in capturing N-NH3 volatilized from urea-treated soil, estimating the daily and accumulated loss rates of N-NH3 correctly.
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support of this research by the Fundação de Amparo á Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP.
ARAÚJO, E.S.; MARSOLA, T.; MIYAZAWA, M.; SOARES, L.H.; URQUIAGA, S.; BODDEY, R.M. & ALVES, B.J.R. Calibração de câmara semiaberta para a quantificação de amônia volatilizada do solo. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., 44:769-776, 2009. [ Links ]
BALSALOBRE, M.A.A. Valor alimentar do capim Tanzânia irrigado. Piracicaba, Universidade São Paulo/ESALQ, 2002. 113p. (Tese de Doutorado) [ Links ]
CARMO, C.A.F.S.; NOGUEIRA, A.R.A.; MATOS, A.O.; SILVA, D.J.; MONTEIRO, F.L.; SOUZA, G.B.; PITTA, G.V.; CARLOS, G.M.; OLIVEIRA, H.; COMASTRI FILHO, J.A.; MIYAZAWA, M. & OLIVEIRA NETO, W. Tecido vegetal. In: NOGUEIRA, A.R.A. & SOUZA, G.B., eds. Manual de laboratórios: Solo, água, nutrição vegetal, nutrição animal e alimentos. São Carlos, Embrapa, 2005. p.145-198. [ Links ]
COSTA, M.C.G.; VITTI, G.C. & CANTARELLA, H. Volatilização de N-NH3 de fontes nitrogenadas em cana-de-açúcar colhida sem despalha a fogo. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 27:631-637, 2003. [ Links ]
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solo. Rio de Janeiro, 1999. 421p. [ Links ]
HODGSON, J.G. Grazing management: Science into practice. New York, Longman Scientific and Technical, 1990. 203p. [ Links ]
LARA CABEZAS, W.A.R. & TRIVELIN, P.C.O. Eficiência de um coletor semi-aberto estático na quantificação de N-NH3 volatilizado da uréia aplicada ao solo. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 14:345-352, 1990. [ Links ]
LARA CABEZAS, W.A.R.; TRIVELIN, P.C.O.; BENDASSOLI, J.A.; SANTANA, D.G. & GASCHO, G.J. Calibration of a semi-open static collector for determination of ammonia volatilization from nitrogen fertilizer. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 30:389-406, 1999. [ Links ]
MACHADO, P.L.O.A.; PRIMAVESI, A.C.; ALVES, B.J.R.; ROSSO, C.; BATISTA, E.M.; PRATES, H.T.; ORTIZ, F.R.; MELLO, J.; FERRAZ, M.R.; LINHARES, N.W.; MOELLER, R.; ALVES, R.C.S. & SILVA, M.S. Métodos de análise de solo. In: NOGUEIRA, A.R.A. & SOUZA, G.B., eds. Manual de laboratórios: Solo, água, nutrição vegetal, nutrição animal e alimentos. São Carlos, Embrapa, 2005. p.67-130. [ Links ]
NÖNMIK, H. The effect of pellet size on the ammonia loss from urea applied to forest soil. Plant Soil, 39:309-318, 1973. [ Links ]
OLIVEIRA, P.P.A. Manejo da calagem e da fertilização nitrogenada na recuperação de pastagens degradadas de Brachiaria sp. em solos arenosos. Piracicaba, Universidade de São Paulo/CENA, 2001. 110p. (Tese de Doutorado) [ Links ]
OLIVEIRA, P.P.A; TRIVELIN, P.C.O.; OLIVEIRA, W.S. & CORSI, M. Eficiência da fertilização nitrogenada com uréia (15N) em Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu associada ao parcelamento de superfosfato simples e cloreto de potássio. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 27:613-620, 2003. [ Links ]
OLIVEIRA, P.P.A.; TRIVELIN, P.C.O. & OLIVEIRA, W.S. Balanço do nitrogênio (15N) da úreia nos componentes de uma pastagem de capim-marandu sob recuperação em diferentes épocas de calagem. R. Bras. Zootec., 36:1982-1989, 2007. [ Links ]
QUAGGIO, J. & RAIJ, B. van. Correção da Acidez do Solo. In: RAIJ, B. van; CANTARELLA, H.; QUAGGIO, J.A. & FURLANI, A.M.C., eds. Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo. 2.ed. Campinas, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas/Fundação IAC, 1996. p.15-19. [ Links ]
SAS Institute. Statistical Analysis System. User's guide: Statistics. Cary, 1999. [ Links ]
Received for publication in October 2009 and approved in October 2010.
* Part of first author's M.S. dissertation. Research funded by FAPESP.