Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Response to De Jong Van Lier's comments on “Quantitative assessment of soil physical quality in northern China based on S-theory” [Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2015;39:1311-21]

We are grateful to De Jong van Lier for raising queries about our study (Yang et al., 2015Yang D, Bian Z, Zhang K, Xiong J, Lei S. Quantitative assessment of soil physical quality in northern China based on S-theory. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2015;39:1311-21. doi:10.1590/01000683rbcs20150030
https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs2015...
) which merits some clarification, and we would like to reply to his comments.

The principal purpose of our study (Yang et al., 2015Yang D, Bian Z, Zhang K, Xiong J, Lei S. Quantitative assessment of soil physical quality in northern China based on S-theory. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2015;39:1311-21. doi:10.1590/01000683rbcs20150030
https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs2015...
) was to determine soil physical quality in the Haihe River Basin in northern China using the S-index proposed by Dexter (2004)Dexter AR. Soil physical quality. Part 1. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma. 2004;120:201-14. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003....
. The S-theory, developed with a basis on European soils, has been applied worldwide and produced plausible results. We noted the argument from De Jong van Lier (2014)De Jong Van Lier Q. Revisiting the S-index for soil physical quality and its use in Brazil. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2014;38:1-10. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832014000100001
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-0683201400...
that the S-index could have a negative mathematical relationship to soil bulk density and therefore had no additional value over soil bulk density. We regret that we did not discuss this further in our study.

The reason we adopted the S-theory was the ease it offered in calculating and providing critical values for classification of soil physical quality; no such values were available for other methods using different indicators, such as bulk density or total porosity. We agree with De Jong van Lier, though, that the absolute value of the S-index for classification of soil physical quality is debatable. However, the values suggested by Dexter (2004)Dexter AR. Soil physical quality. Part 1. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma. 2004;120:201-14. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003....
and Dexter and Czyż (2007)Dexter AR, Czyż EA. Applications of S-Theory in the study of soil physical degradation and its consequences. Land Degrad Dev. 2007;18:369-81. doi:10.1002/ldr.779
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.779...
were based on fairly extensive studies on various soils, and formed a reasonable basis for adoption. Obviously, more analysis is required in future studies. We should have made this clear in the discussion in our study (Yang et al., 2015Yang D, Bian Z, Zhang K, Xiong J, Lei S. Quantitative assessment of soil physical quality in northern China based on S-theory. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2015;39:1311-21. doi:10.1590/01000683rbcs20150030
https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs2015...
).

The negative relationship between the S-index and soil bulk density in our study was obtained by a fitting procedure, which could be mathematically derived, as shown in De Jong van Lier (2014)De Jong Van Lier Q. Revisiting the S-index for soil physical quality and its use in Brazil. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2014;38:1-10. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832014000100001
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-0683201400...
.

As discussed in De Jong van Lier (2014)De Jong Van Lier Q. Revisiting the S-index for soil physical quality and its use in Brazil. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2014;38:1-10. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832014000100001
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-0683201400...
that the S-index is a static parameter which is unable to describe dynamic processes, efforts should be made towards mechanistic soil physics. Such a suggestion is currently feasible since sophisticated physics-based hydrological models are widely available.

Dejun Yang(1)* and Kefeng Zhang(2)
(1) China University of Mining and Technology,
School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, Xuzhou, China.
(2) Zhejiang University, Ningbo Institute of Technology, Ningbo, China.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1361214, 51379187) and the 973 Program (No.2013CB227904).

REFERENCES

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    2016
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo Secretaria Executiva , Caixa Postal 231, 36570-000 Viçosa MG Brasil, Tel.: (55 31) 3899 2471 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: sbcs@ufv.br