Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Winter cover crops effects on soil organic carbon and soil physical quality in a Typical Argiudoll under continuous soybean cropping

ABSTRACT

The massive adoption of no-tillage (NT), along with the simplification of the cropping sequences has led to physical and chemical degradation of soils. To recover degraded soils, cover crops have been proposed as an alternative to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) and to improve soil physical quality (SPQ). This study aimed (i) to determine the content of SOC and its physical and chemical fractions at different layers and positions, in a soil with a soybean crop under NT with and without winter cover crops, and (ii) to determine SPQ indicators in a soybean crop under NT with and without winter cover crops. Measures and samples were made on a field experiment in a typical Argiudoll of the Argentinean Pampas. Soil organic carbon, coarse and fine particulate organic carbon (POCc and POCf), mineral associated organic carbon (MOC), fulvic acids (FA), humic acids (HA), and humins (H) were determined. Soil physical quality indicators determined were: soil bulk density and total porosity from field samples, and saturated hydraulic conductivity, water-conducting macro and mesoporosity, and total porosity connectivity from field water infiltration data. After eight years, cover crops did not cause any observable change in whole SOC content, but significant differences were observed for some SOC fractions. Humic acids and POCc had 40 and 25 % increases, respectively, in the cover crop treatment. Mineral associated organic carbon and H decreased by 9 and 7 % in cover crop treatment. Soil physical quality did not improve after eight years of cover crops. This can be related to degradation processes after 20 years of soybean monoculture under NT, and to the low ability of Argiudolls to recover from physical degradation.

Keywords:
particulate organic carbon; humic acids; fulvic acids; saturated hydraulic conductivity; water-conducting porosity

INTRODUCTION

In Argentina, agricultural systems have gone through a big transformation since the adoption of no-tillage (NT), which allowed the expansion of the agricultural frontier and a constant increase in crop productivity (Domínguez and Bedano, 2016). Among other things, NT was implemented as a strategy to protect soils and increase soil organic carbon (SOC) contents ( Lal et al., 2007Lal R, Reicosky DC, Hanson JD. Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming. Soil Till Res. 2007;93:2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.11.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.11....
). However, the adoption of NT has been accompanied by a simplification of cropping systems, characterized by the massive adoption of soybean monoculture and the disappearance of pastures and rotations ( Carrasco et al., 2012Carrasco AE, Sánchez NE, Tamagno LE. Modelo agrícola e impacto socio-ambiental en la Argentina: monocultivo y agronegocios. La Plata: Asociación de Universidades Grupo Montevideo y Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2012. ; ISAAA, 2016). These simplified cropping systems under NT have led to physical and chemical degradation of soils ( Irizar et al., 2015Irizar AB, Milesi Delaye LA, Andriulo AE. Projection of soil organic carbon reserves in the Argentine Rolling Pampa under different agronomic scenarios. Relationship of these reserves with some soil properties. Open Agric J. 2015;9:30-41. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/487865
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/487865...
; Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
). Summer monocultures imply long fallow periods with low soil cover, leaving the soil unprotected to rain and temperature changes, and increasing degradation risk ( Romaniuk et al., 2018Romaniuk R, Beltrán M, Brutti L, Costantini A, Bacigaluppo S, Sainz-Rozas H, Salvagiotti F. Soil organic carbon, macro-and micronutrient changes in soil fractions with different lability in response to crop intensification. Soil Till Res. 2018;181:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04....
). Álvarez et al. (2011) concluded that continuous NT management did not recovery SOC in the Argentinean Pampas. In particular, soybean monoculture causes a decrease in SOC level, because this crop leaves very little and easily degradable residues ( Olson et al., 2010Olson KR, Ebelhar SA, Lang JM. Cover crop effects on crop yields and soil organic carbon content. Soil Sci. 2010;175:89-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181cf7959
https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181cf7...
; Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
; Behrends Kraemer et al., 2017).

In addition, the conversion to simplified rotations under NT can lead to the formation of massive structure or platy structure, especially in soils with high silt contents like most soils in the Pampas region (Argiudolls) ( Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
, 2017). This way of physical degradation may be enhanced in soils under soybean monoculture ( Lozano et al., 2014Lozano LA. Desarrollo de estructura laminar del suelo en siembra directa. Factores predisponentes y efectos sobre las propiedades hidráulicas [thesis]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2014. ; Novelli et al., 2017Novelli LE, Caviglia OP, Piñeiro G. Increased cropping intensity improves crop residue inputs to the soil and aggregate-associated soil organic carbon stocks. Soil Till Res. 2017;165:128-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08....
), as soybean is harvested during the wettest period of the year and has a poorly developed root system, and thus is less able to generate porosity and structure than graminaceous crops ( Imhoff et al., 2010Imhoff S, Ghiberto PJ, Grioni A, Gay JP. Porosity characterization of Argiudolls under different management systems in the Argentine Flat Pampa. Geoderma. 2010;158:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010....
). Processes of physical degradation may reduce crop yields and the ability of soils to conduct water ( Lipiec et al., 1991Lipiec J, Tarkiewicz S, Kossowski J. Soil physical properties and growth of spring barley as related to the degree of compactness of two soils. Soil Till Res. 1991;19:307-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(91)90098-I
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(91)900...
; Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
, 2017).

To recover degraded soils, cover crops have been proposed as an alternative to increase soil cover and C inputs ( Poeplau and Don, 2015Poeplau C, Don A. Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops - A meta-analysis. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2015;200:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.0...
; Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
) and to improve soil physical quality (SPQ) (Recio-Vázquez et al., 2014). Many studies reported that cover crops increased SOC ( Blanco-Canqui et al., 2011Blanco-Canqui H, Mikha MM, Presley DR, Claassen MM. Addition of cover crops enhances no-till potential for improving soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011;75:1471-82. https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430
https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430...
, 2015; Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
; Álvarez et al., 2017; Jian et al., 2020Jian J, Du X, Reiter MS, Stewart RD. A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;143:107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.1...
), being the effect greater in the top of the soil, and affecting deeper layers after longer periods (>6 years) ( Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
). Many authors studied the effect of cover crop species on SOC, concluding that mixtures of legumes and gramineous can lead to a greater increase of SOC, due to greater biomass production ( Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
). On the other hand, some authors did not find differences in SOC with the inclusion of cover crops ( Yang et al., 2004Yang Z, Singh BRM, Sitaula BK. Fractions of organic carbon in soils under different crop rotations, cover crops and fertilization practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys. 2004;70:161-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000048479.30593.ea
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.000004847...
; Fronning et al., 2008Fronning BE, Thelen KD, Min DH. Use of manure, compost, and cover crops to supplant crop residue carbon in corn stover removed cropping systems. Agron J. 2008;100:1703-10. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0052
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0052...
). In a meta-analysis, Jian et al. (2020)Jian J, Du X, Reiter MS, Stewart RD. A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;143:107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.1...
found that cover crops caused a mean increase in SOC of 15 %, which rose up to 30 % in studies under NT. However, some studies considered in this meta-analysis found no change on SOC, especially when the main crops were corn-soybean, corn-wheat/soybean or soybean monoculture ( Jian et al., 2020Jian J, Du X, Reiter MS, Stewart RD. A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;143:107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.1...
). Blanco-Canqui et al. (2015)Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
concluded that while cover crops generally increase SOC, this effect is not frequently detectable in the first few years after establishment. A possible explanation for this is that SOC content is not sensitive enough to detect short-term changes due to management practices ( Purakayastha et al., 2008Purakayastha TJ, Rudrappa L, Singh D, Swarup A, Bhadraray S. Long-term impact of fertilizers on soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in maize–wheat–cowpea cropping system. Geoderma. 2008;144:370-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.12.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007....
), while the content of different fractions of SOC may be more sensitive ( Ding et al., 2006Ding G, Liu X, Herbert S, Novak J, Amarasiriwardena D, Xing B. Effect of cover crop management on soil organic matter. Geoderma. 2006;130:229-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005....
; Plaza-Bonilla et al., 2014Plaza-Bonilla D, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Cantero-Martínez C. Identifying soil organic carbon fractions sensitive to agricultural management practices. Soil Till Res. 2014;139:19-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01....
). Romaniuk et al. (2018)Romaniuk R, Beltrán M, Brutti L, Costantini A, Bacigaluppo S, Sainz-Rozas H, Salvagiotti F. Soil organic carbon, macro-and micronutrient changes in soil fractions with different lability in response to crop intensification. Soil Till Res. 2018;181:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04....
and Duval et al. (2016) found that winter cover crops increased the content of coarse particulate organic carbon (POCc) before significant SOC changes could be observed. On the other hand, Duval et al. (2013)Duval ME, Galantini JA, Iglesias JO, Canelo S, Martinez JM, Wall L. Analysis of organic fractions as indicators of soil quality under natural and cultivated systems. Soil Till Res. 2013;131:11-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.03.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.03....
found that the POCf fraction was the most sensitive to management. Romaniuk et al. (2018)Romaniuk R, Beltrán M, Brutti L, Costantini A, Bacigaluppo S, Sainz-Rozas H, Salvagiotti F. Soil organic carbon, macro-and micronutrient changes in soil fractions with different lability in response to crop intensification. Soil Till Res. 2018;181:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04....
reported that the inclusion of wheat as a cover crop in a soybean monoculture did not increase mineral associated organic carbon (MOC) content, but MOC increased with the inclusion of corn and wheat in the crop rotation. Other studies determine the content of different fractions of SOC obtained by chemical fractionation, for instance, fulvic acids (FA), humic acids (HA), and humins (H), which are related to more labile, intermediate, and more resistant SOC pools, respectively. Guimarães et al. (2013) and Yang et al. (2004) reported that cover crops increased the H fraction in the top 0.10 and 0.25 m of soil, respectively, and found no differences in the content of FA and HA. Arlauskienė et al. (2010) studied the effect of different cover crops on different kinds of HA on a clay loam soil and found that cover crops increased the more labile HA after the first year. These authors also reported that after the second year of treatment more stable HA were formed.

Cover crops can also improve SPQ, both by increasing SOC and because of the effect of roots and enhanced biological activity ( Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
; Lozano et al., 2014Lozano LA. Desarrollo de estructura laminar del suelo en siembra directa. Factores predisponentes y efectos sobre las propiedades hidráulicas [thesis]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2014. ; Behrends Kraemer et al., 2017). Many authors reported that cover crops improve SPQ, increasing porosity, macroporosity, and pore connectivity ( Carof et al., 2007Carof M, De Tourdonnet S, Coquet Y, Hallaire V, Roger-Estrade J. Hydraulic conductivity and porosity under conventional and no-tillage and the effect of three species of cover crop in northern France. Soil Use Manage. 2007;23:230-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00085.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007...
; Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
; Basche and DeLonge, 2017Basche A, DeLonge M. The impact of continuous living cover on soil hydrologic properties: A meta-analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2017;81:1179-90. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.03.0077
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.03.007...
; Calonego et al., 2017Calonego JC, Raphael JP, Rigon JP, de Oliveira Neto L, Rosolem CA. Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling. Eur J Agron. 2017;85:31-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.00...
). Increased water infiltration under cover crops as compared to bare fallow has been reported ( Blanco-Canqui et al., 2011Blanco-Canqui H, Mikha MM, Presley DR, Claassen MM. Addition of cover crops enhances no-till potential for improving soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011;75:1471-82. https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430
https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430...
; Álvarez et al., 2017; Haruna et al., 2018Haruna SI, Anderson SH, Nkongolo NV, Zaibon S. Soil hydraulic properties: influence of tillage and cover crops. Pedosphere. 2018;28:430-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60387-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60...
; Chalise et al., 2019Chalise KS, Singh S, Wegner BR, Kumar S, Pérez-Gutiérrez JD, Osborne SL, Nleya T, Guzman J, Rohila JS. Cover crops and returning residue impact on soil organic carbon, bulk density, penetration resistance, water retention, infiltration, and soybean yield. Agron J. 2019;111:99-108. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.03.0213
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.03.02...
). In a review, Blanco-Canqui et al. (2015)Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
reported that studies on the effect of cover crops on water infiltration were few and that an increase between 1.1 and 2.7 times was found. In another review, Basche and DeLonge (2019)Basche AD, DeLonge MS. Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis. PloS ONE. 2019;14:e0215702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215702
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.021...
found that cover crops increased infiltration rates, especially after the fourth year since cover crop inclusion (mean increment of 35 %). However, these authors found that this increment was greater in coarser soils and regions with annual precipitations below 650 mm. In contrast, some studies report cover crops may cause a decrease in saturated hydraulic conductivity, which may be temporal, and may be caused by pore-clogging by roots or by reduced fissures formation in a covered soil ( Carof et al., 2007Carof M, De Tourdonnet S, Coquet Y, Hallaire V, Roger-Estrade J. Hydraulic conductivity and porosity under conventional and no-tillage and the effect of three species of cover crop in northern France. Soil Use Manage. 2007;23:230-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00085.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007...
; Bodner et al., 2008Bodner G, Loiskandl W, Buchan G, Kaul HP. Natural and management-induced dynamics of hydraulic conductivity along a cover-cropped field slope. Geoderma. 2008;146:317-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008....
). Other authors found no effect of cover crops on saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0) ( Wagger and Denton, 1989Wagger MG, Denton HP. Influence of cover crop and wheel traffic on soil physical properties in continuous no-till corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1989;53:1206-10. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300040036x
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.036159...
).

The effect of cover crops on SOC contents and SPQ frequently depends on cover crop species, soil texture, initial SOC contents, climatic conditions, and the amount and characteristics of the belowground development ( Ding et al., 2002Ding G, Novak JM, Amarasiriwardena D, Hunt PG, Xing B. Soil organic matter characteristics as affected by tillage management. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2002;66:421-9. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0421
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0421...
; Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
). Some authors found that soils from the Pampas region with high silt content have a low probability of recovering its topsoil porosity after several years of NT, even with higher organic carbon contents in surface layers ( Taboada et al., 1998Taboada MA, Micucci FG, Cosentino DJ, Lavado RS. Comparison of compaction induced by conventional and zero tillage in two soils of the Rolling Pampa of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 1998;49:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00132-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00...
). The structure of these soils has low resilience ( Taboada et al., 2008Taboada MA, Barbosa OA, Cosentino DJ. Null creation of air-filled structural pores by soil cracking and shrinkage in silty loamy soils. Soil Sci. 2008;173:130-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31815d8e9d
https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31815d8...
), affecting their ability to recover, even when more adequate management practices are applied. Thus, though cover crops are thought to increase SOC and positively affect SPQ, documentation is limited and needs to be broadened under different soil textural classes and crop species ( Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
). Information about the effect of cover crops on SOC fractions obtained by chemical fractionation and in depth is scarce. Information on the potential of cover crops to accumulate SOC in depth is also scarce ( Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
). Another aspect of SOC distribution is its spatial variation within a plot. There is literature on how SOC varies with topography, but there is little information on how it varies within short distances. In this sense, differences between the row and the inter-row of the previous crop can be expected to be found, as differences in root development and earthworms' abundance between these positions have been reported ( Mengel and Barber, 1974Mengel DB, Barber SA. Development and distribution of the corn root system under field conditions. Agron J. 1974;66:341-44. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030002x
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021...
; Binet et al., 1997Binet F, Hallaire V, Curmi P. Agricultural practices and the spatial distribution of earthworms in maize fields. Relationships between earthworm abundance, maize plants and soil compaction. Soil Biol Biochem. 1997;29:577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00182-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00...
). In addition, establishing relationships between SOC fractions and other soil properties that may define SPQ is still a challenge ( Lal, 2009Lal R. Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research. Eur J Soil Sci. 2009;60:158-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01114.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008...
), that could provide valuable information to understand the functions of different SOC pools. The reviewed literature is summarized in tables 1 and 2 .

Table 1
Effect of cover crops on soil organic carbon (SOC) and SOC fractions in the reviewed literature
Table 2
Effect of cover crops on soil physical quality indicators in the reviewed literature

We hypothesized that (i) winter cover crops induce a change in SOC distribution in the profile, especially by an increment in the top layer of soil and in the row; (ii) newer fractions of SOC (FA and POCc) are the most sensitive fractions to the inclusion of cover crops; and (iii) winter cover crops improve SPQ in a silty loam soil degraded by soybean monoculture. The aims of this study were (i) to determine the content of SOC and its physical and chemical fractions at different positions and layers, in a soil with a soybean crop under NT with and without winter cover crop; and (ii) to determine SPQ indicators in a soybean crop under NT with and without winter cover crop.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling site

Samples were taken from an experiment set up at the Pergamino Experimental Station of the Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Pergamino (33° 51’ S, 60° 40’ W). The climate is temperate humid without a dry season, with a mean annual temperature of 16.5 °C and mean annual rainfall of 971 mm ( Restovich et al., 2012Restovich SB, Andriulo AE, Portela SI. Introduction of cover crops in a maize–soybean rotation of the Humid Pampas: Effect on nitrogen and water dynamics. Field Crops Res. 2012;128:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.01...
). Soil at the study site is a Typic Argiudoll (Soil Survey Staff, 2014) of the Pergamino series. This soil is deep, well-developed, and well-drained. Soil texture, bulk density (BD), and pH(H2O) at a ratio of 1:2.5 are presented in table 3 .

Table 3
Particle size distribution, bulk density (BD), and pH (soil to water ratio 1:2.5) for soils under soybean monoculture (SBF) and soybean with cover crop (SCC)

The trial consisted of a completely randomized design with 30 × 10 m plots, with two treatments and three repetitions. The sampled plots had the same relative position in the landscape. Treatments were: (i) soybean monoculture under NT (SBF) and (ii) soybean crop with a winter cover crop under NT (SCC). The plots under study (SCC and SBF treatments) have had soybean ( Glycine max L.) under NT as the main crop since 1987 (for the last 30 years). The cover crop was included in the SCC plots in spring 2010 (eight years before sampling date), while SBF plots were left under soybean monoculture. Soybean was seeded with a distance between rows of 0.52 m. Cover crop was an oat ( Avena sativa L.) and vetch ( Vicia sativa L.) mixture with densities of 20 and 40 kg ha-1, respectively. An experimental seeder with a cone plot planter was employed. Soybean was fertilized at seeding with 12 kg ha-1 of P; cover crop was not fertilized. The plot without cover crop was chemically maintained without weeds during fallow. Cover crop was dried with glyphosate (48 %, 3 L ha-1) in spring (October 2018), at the reproductive stage, to seed soybean. Mean temperature and precipitations for that year were 16.7 °C and 970.6 mm.

Sample collection and analytical procedures

Soil samples were collected at the end of November 2018 (after soybean seeding and in V2 development stage). For each treatment (SCC and SBF), position (row and inter-row of the previous soybean crop), and layer (0.00-0.05, 0.05-0.10, and 0.10-0.20 m), three homogenized samples were composed of over 15 randomly selected spots (final number of samples = 18). Additionally, for each treatment, three composite samples were taken at 0.20-0.40 m (Bt horizon), without differentiating between row and inter-row positions (final number of samples = 6). After measuring moisture, samples were air-dried and pulverized to pass through a 2 mm sieve and frozen. To determine BD and TP, four undisturbed soil samples were collected for each treatment and position, employing cylinders (5 cm diameter and 5 cm high, 98 cm3 volume). A compacted layer was observed below 0.10 m depth.

Physical fractionation of SOC

Different particle size fractions of SOC were obtained following the method described by Duval et al. (2018)Duval ME, Galantini JA, Martínez FL. Labile soil organic carbon for assessing soil quality: influence of management practices and edaphic conditions. Catena. 2018;171:316-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07...
which is based on Cambardella and Elliot (1992)Cambardella CA, Elliot ET. Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1992;56:777-83. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.036159...
. Briefly, 50 g of dry soil were physically dispersed by 16 h of agitation in a rotary shaker with 500 mL of water and 10 glass beads. The suspension was then sieved through 105 and 53 μm sieves and washed until wash water was clean to the naked eye. Three fractions were obtained: (1) coarse particulate organic carbon (POCc), which is the fraction between 105 and 2000 μm; (2) fine particulate organic carbon (POCf), which is the fraction between 53 and 105 μm; and (3) mineral associated organic carbon (MOC), the fraction smaller than 53 μm, which is discarded and then estimated by difference. Each fraction was transferred to a Petri dish, dried at 40 °C until constant weight, and weighted. After this, the material was sieved through a 500 μm sieve for SOC determination.

Chemical fractionation of SOC

Separation of different chemical fractions of SOC was achieved following the protocol described by Benites et al. (2003)Benites VM, Madari B, Machado PLOA. Extração e fracionamento quantitativo de substâncias húmicas do solo: um procedimento simplificado de baixo custo. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimiento; 2003. (Comunicado técnico 16). that is a modification of the method described by Schnitzer (1982)Schnitzer M. Organic matter characterization. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 - Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd ed. Madison: Soil Science Society of America; 1982. p. 581-94. . Approximately 1 g of dry soil was weighed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes. Dissolution of HA and FA was achieved with a long extraction (24 h) with 20 mL of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (0.1 mol L-1). The supernatant (HA+FA) was separated from the solid by centrifugation (20 min at 4000 rpm). A second short extraction was performed (1 h with 20 mL of NaOH 0.1 mol L-1) followed by centrifugation. Supernatants obtained from the two extractions were transferred to a single tube. Afterwards, HA were precipitated by acidification of the extracted solution to pH 1.0 ± 0.1 with sulfuric acid (H2SO4) 20 % v/v and allowed to stand for 24 h. Humic acids were separated from FA by filtration under vacuum, employing a 0.45 μm pore size cellulose ester membrane filter. After collecting the FA fraction (filtrate), HA were dissolved to pass through the filter with NaOH (0.1 mol L-1). Both FA and HA fractions were diluted to a known volume of 50 mL.

Soil organic carbon quantification

Soil organic carbon contents for whole soil, POCc, POCf, HA, and FA were determined by the wet oxidation method described by Walkley and Black (1934)Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-38. . The SOC from the MOC and H fractions was calculated by difference, subtracting from SOC value the other two fractions (POCc and POCf for MOC, and HA and FA for H). In all cases, SOC is expressed as g of oxidizable carbon per 100 g of soil dry mass (g 100 g-1). The relative contribution of each fraction to SOC is expressed as a rate (content of the fraction/SOC).

SPQ indicators

Soil BD was measured using the core method ( Blake and Hartge, 1986Blake GR, Hartge KH. Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis. In: Kluter A, editor. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 - Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison: Soil Science Society of America; 1986. p. 363-75. ). Total porosity (TP) was calculated from BD, using a particle density of 2.55 Mg m-3 ( Villarreal, 2018Villarreal R. Variación temporal de las propiedades físicas del suelo y su impacto en la dinámica del glifosato en suelos bajo siembra directa y labranza convencional [thesis]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2018. ). Soil water infiltration was measured in the field employing disc infiltrometers ( Perroux and White, 1988Perroux KM, White I. Designs for disc permeameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1988;52:1205-15. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050001x
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.036159...
) (disc diameter = 12.5 cm), at four randomly selected sites for each treatment and position (row vs inter-row). After removing plant and mulch cover, infiltrometers were placed on a thin sand layer, to improve contact. Infiltration measurements were run at 6, 3, and 0 cm tension (h), in that order and the same place. Each infiltration run was performed for one hour, allowing to reach the steady state. Dynamic SPQ indicators were calculated from infiltrometer data. Hydraulic conductivity at different tensions was calculated using the multiple head method ( Ankeny et al., 1991Ankeny MD, Ahmed M, Kaspar TC, Horton R. Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1991;55:467-70. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020028x
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.036159...
). Water-conducting macroporosity (εma, equivalent r >0.5 mm) and water-conducting mesoporosity (εme, 0.5> r >0.25 mm) were calculated from K data according to Watson and Luxmoore (1986)Watson KW, Luxmoore RJ. Estimating macroporosity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1986;50:578-82. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.036159...
. Total porosity connectivity (CwTP) was calculated as the quotient between K0 and TP ( Lozano et al., 2013Lozano LA, Soracco CG, Cornelis WM, Gabriels D, Sarli GO, Villarreal R. Anisotropy of pore size classes' connectivity related to soil structure under no tillage. Soil Sci. 2013;178:612-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000027
https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000...
). Particle size distribution was measured using the pipette method ( Gee and Bauder, 1986Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle-size analysis. In: Kluter A, editor. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 - Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison: Soil Science Society of America; 1986. p. 383-411. ).

Statistical analysis

ANOVA was performed to determine the interaction and effect of the studied factors. Values were expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation. Means were compared using Fisher's LSD50 test (p-value<0.05), and significant differences were expressed using different letters. The distribution of K0, εma, εme, and CWTP is log-normal, so values were log-transformed before statistical analysis. All analyses were performed using INFOSTAT software (Di Rienzo et al., 2008).

RESULTS

SOC composition and distribution with depth and between row and inter-row

ANOVA results are shown in table 4 . There was no interaction between factors for any of the variables studied. Soil organic carbon and all SOC fractions were affected by depth. Humic acids, H, POCc, and MOC were also significantly affected by treatment (SCC vs SBF). Position (row vs inter-row) had no effect on the content of SOC or SOC fractions. Thus, mean values between the row and the inter-row are used in the discussion. The SOC and all SOC fractions contents were higher near the surface and diminished with depth ( Table 5 ). Soil organic carbon, POCc, POCf, MOC, FA, and H showed similar vertical distribution, with higher values in the 0.00-0.05 m layer and with no significant differences between the 0.05-0.10 and 0.10-0.20 m layer. The HA content followed the order 0.00-0.05 m > 0.05-0.10 m > 0.10-0.20 m. At 0.20-0.40 m, values of SOC and SOC fractions diminished. Considering mean values for each fraction, SOC, H, and MOC values at the 0.20-0.40 m layer were around 50 % of those at the 0.10-0.20 m layer, HA content was around 25 % of that in the 0.10-0.20 m layer, while POCc, POCf, and FA contents were around 80 % of those in the 0.10-0.20 m layer.

Table 4
Results of the multifactorial ANOVA for the studied factors (treatment, T; position, P; and depth, D) and their interaction, on the variables studied. Variables were: soil organic carbon (SOC), coarse particulate organic carbon (POCc), fine particulate organic carbon (POCf), mineral associated organic carbon (MOC), fulvic acids (FA), humic acids (HA), and humins (H); the ratio of each of these fractions to SOC; saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0), effective macro and meso-porosity (εma and εme), bulk density (BD), total porosity (TP), and pore connectivity (CWTP)
Table 5
Soil organic carbon content of different physical and chemical fractions (coarse particulate organic carbon, POCc, fine particulate organic carbon, POCf, and mineral associated organic carbon, MOC; and fulvic acids, FA, humic acids, HA, and humins, H) at different layers and positions (row and inter-row) for the studied treatments: (i) soybean with cover crop (SCC) and (ii) soybean with winter bare fallow (SBF)

Regarding the effect of treatment on SOC content, no difference was found between SBF and SCC. Among the physical fractions of SOC, POCc and MOC were affected by treatment. Considering the 0.00-0.20 m layer, POCc showed a 25 % increase in the SCC treatment in relation to SBF ( Table 5 ). This difference was mainly due to higher POCc values in the 0.00-0.05 m layer in the SCC treatment ( Table 5 ). In contrast, MOC content was 9 % higher in the SBF treatment. This difference was greater on the top 0.10 m of soil. Regarding the chemical fractions of SOC, HA content was higher in SCC than in SBF (around 40 % increase in the 0.00-0.20 m layer), while H content was 7 % higher in the SBF treatment. Fulvic acids content was not affected by treatment. Higher HA values in SCC were mainly observed in the top 0.10 m of soil profile. The values of H content were higher in the SBF treatment through all the studied profiles, with the broader difference observed in the 0.05-0.10 m layer.

Relative contribution of different fractions to SOC

There was no interaction between the studied factors (treatment, position, and depth) on fraction/SOC ratios ( Table 4 ). There was no effect of row or inter-row positions on fraction/SOC ratios ( Table 4 ). The POCc/SOC ratio was affected by both treatment and depth, while POCf/SOC and MOC/SOC were only affected by depth. The POCc/SOC was higher in the SCC than in the SBF treatment (0.09 vs 0.07, respectively). This difference was mainly due to higher values in the 0.00-0.05 m layer (0.20 for SCC and 0.16 for SBF). Regarding the vertical distribution, POCc/SOC and POCf/SOC had a similar behavior, with higher values at the surface (0.18 for both), and with no significant differences between the 0.05-0.10 and the 0.10-0.20 m layers (mean value 0.03 for POCc and 0.10 for POCf). The MOC/SOC, in contrast, was higher at 0.05-0.10 and 0.10-0.20 m layers with no differences between them (mean value 0.87), and lower at the 0.00-0.05 m layer (mean value 0.64). Regarding chemical fractions, FA/SOC and H/SOC ratios were not significantly affected by any of the factors studied, showing mean values of 0.10 and 0.75, respectively. The HA/SOC ratio was only affected by treatment, being higher for SCC than for SBF (0.17 and 0.14, respectively). Most SOC was found in the MOC and H fractions, that represent older and more stabilized carbon (with MOC/SOC values ranging 0.58-0.93, and H/SOC 0.69-0.80). This distribution was relatively constant in the 0.20-0.40 m layer.

Soil physical quality indicators

Soil physical quality indicators (K0, εma, εme, BD, TP, and CWTP) showed no interaction between the studied factors and were not affected by treatment nor position ( Table 4 ). Values obtained are shown in table 6 .

Table 6
Values of SPQ indicators: saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0), effective macro and meso-porosity (εma and εme), bulk density (BD), total porosity (TP), and total porosity connectivity (CWTP)

DISCUSSION

SOC composition and distribution with depth and between row and inter-row

In the present study, eight years of an oat+vetch winter cover crop caused no significant differences on total SOC content compared to SBF treatment at any of the studied depths ( Table 5 ). Other authors found no effect of cover crops on SOC. Fronning et al. (2008)Fronning BE, Thelen KD, Min DH. Use of manure, compost, and cover crops to supplant crop residue carbon in corn stover removed cropping systems. Agron J. 2008;100:1703-10. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0052
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0052...
found no changes on SOC in a loam Haplaquoll after three years of winter rye cover cropping in a corn-soybean rotation. Yang et al. (2004)Yang Z, Singh BRM, Sitaula BK. Fractions of organic carbon in soils under different crop rotations, cover crops and fertilization practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys. 2004;70:161-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000048479.30593.ea
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.000004847...
found no changes on SOC after 13 years cover crops in a loam Fluvaqentic Humaquept (with cereals as the main crop and ryegrass and clover as cover crops), though they did find differences in the humin fraction. Plaza-Bonilla et al. (2014)Plaza-Bonilla D, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Cantero-Martínez C. Identifying soil organic carbon fractions sensitive to agricultural management practices. Soil Till Res. 2014;139:19-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01....
reported that the time period needed to observe changes in SOC is normally more than 10 years. In contrast, many authors reported that cover crops increase SOC, even in shorter periods of time since the inclusion of cover crops (4 to 9 years) ( Ding et al., 2006Ding G, Liu X, Herbert S, Novak J, Amarasiriwardena D, Xing B. Effect of cover crop management on soil organic matter. Geoderma. 2006;130:229-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005....
; Varela et al., 2014Varela MF, Scianca CM, Taboada MA, Rubio G. Cover crop effects on soybean residue decomposition and P release in no-tillage systems of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 2014;143:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05....
; Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
; Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
; Álvarez et al., 2017; Beltrán et al., 2018). In a meta-analysis, Jian et al. (2020)Jian J, Du X, Reiter MS, Stewart RD. A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;143:107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.1...
found that cover crops produced a mean SOC increase of 30 % on soils under NT. However, these authors also reported lower or no SOC increases in studies under soybean and in studies where cover crop was a grass and legume mixture. Other studies suggest that, when soybean is the main crop, gramineous cover crops can increase SOC content (as compared to leguminous or mixtures) ( Varela et al., 2014Varela MF, Scianca CM, Taboada MA, Rubio G. Cover crop effects on soybean residue decomposition and P release in no-tillage systems of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 2014;143:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05....
; Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
; Beltrán et al., 2018). These results suggest that a proper balance between graminaceous and leguminous crops should be maintained to achieve SOC increases, and that graminaceous cover crops are more adequate for soybean monoculture.

It has been stated that the study of different fractions of SOC can be more sensitive to management induced changes than SOC content ( Ding et al., 2006Ding G, Liu X, Herbert S, Novak J, Amarasiriwardena D, Xing B. Effect of cover crop management on soil organic matter. Geoderma. 2006;130:229-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005....
; Plaza-Bonilla et al., 2014Plaza-Bonilla D, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Cantero-Martínez C. Identifying soil organic carbon fractions sensitive to agricultural management practices. Soil Till Res. 2014;139:19-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01....
; Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
). In this study, POCc was 25 % higher in the cover crop treatment, due to higher residue inputs in the soil surface ( Franzluebbers, 2002Franzluebbers AJ. Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality. Soil Till Res. 2002;66:95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00018-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00...
; Eclesia et al., 2016Eclesia RP, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB, Rizzotto M, Piñeiro G. Stabilization of new carbon inputs rather than old carbon decomposition determines soil organic carbon shifts following woody or herbaceous vegetation transitions. Plant Soil. 2016;409:99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-...
). Other authors also found an increase in POCc caused by cover crops. Duval et al. (2016)Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
reported 50 and 31 % increases of POCc at the 0.00-0.05 and 0.05-0.10 m layers, respectively, with an oat+vetch cover crop in relation to bare fallow. Beltrán et al. (2018) found that an oat cover crop increased POCc by 38.7 % in a soybean crop. Romaniuk et al. (2018)Romaniuk R, Beltrán M, Brutti L, Costantini A, Bacigaluppo S, Sainz-Rozas H, Salvagiotti F. Soil organic carbon, macro-and micronutrient changes in soil fractions with different lability in response to crop intensification. Soil Till Res. 2018;181:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04....
found that POCc was three times higher when wheat was included as a cover crop in a soybean crop.

The content of MOC was higher in the SBF treatment than in the SCC treatment, especially in the top 0.10 m of soil. This result was unexpected, as MOC is a stable fraction of SOC, physically protected against degradation because of its interaction with the mineral phase ( Six et al., 2002Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil. 2002;241:155-76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789...
). Higher values in a fraction of SOC can be explained by higher SOC formation or by lower SOC degradation in that fraction ( Eclesia et al., 2016Eclesia RP, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB, Rizzotto M, Piñeiro G. Stabilization of new carbon inputs rather than old carbon decomposition determines soil organic carbon shifts following woody or herbaceous vegetation transitions. Plant Soil. 2016;409:99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-...
). Even though MOC is thought to be a stable SOC fraction with low turnover rates, some studies suggest that management changes can affect stabilized SOC ( Six et al., 2002Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil. 2002;241:155-76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789...
; Piñeiro et al., 2009; Hopkins et al., 2012Hopkins FM, Torn MS, Trumbore SE. Warming accelerates decomposition of decades-old carbon in forest soils. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E1753-61. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120603109
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120603109...
). Some authors suggested that new residue inputs can have a priming effect on SOC mineralization ( Galantini, 2008Galantini JA. Fraccionamiento de la materia orgánica del suelo. In: Galantini JA, editor. Estudio de las fracciones orgánicas en suelos de Argentina. Bahía Blanca: Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur; 2008. p. 19-39. ; Pausch et al., 2013Pausch J, Zhu B, Kuzyakov Y, Cheng W. Plant inter-species effects on rhizosphere priming of soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;57:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.0...
; Varela et al., 2014Varela MF, Scianca CM, Taboada MA, Rubio G. Cover crop effects on soybean residue decomposition and P release in no-tillage systems of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 2014;143:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05....
; Poeplau and Don, 2015Poeplau C, Don A. Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops - A meta-analysis. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2015;200:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.0...
). Blanco-Canqui et al. (2015)Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
reports that roots from cover crops have a disruptive effect that somehow resembles that of tillage, and thus could enhance SOC mineralization. Also, soil organic matter in these plots that had a long history of soybean monoculture can have a low C/N ratio (and thus can be easily degradable), as soil organic matter resembles in composition that of the residues that formed it ( Six and Jastrow, 2002Six J, Jastrow JD. Organic matter turnover. In: Lal R, editor. Encyclopedia of soil science. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002. p. 936-42. ; Eclesia et al., 2016Eclesia RP, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB, Rizzotto M, Piñeiro G. Stabilization of new carbon inputs rather than old carbon decomposition determines soil organic carbon shifts following woody or herbaceous vegetation transitions. Plant Soil. 2016;409:99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-...
). Duval et al. (2016)Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
also found lower MOC values under cover crops that were attributed to a dry year, in which the bare fallow treatment kept higher moisture content and had more favorable conditions for POC to MOC turnover than the cover crop treatment. In this study POCf was not affected by treatment nor position. On the contrary, other authors found that POCf was the most sensitive fraction to agricultural practices and to the inclusion of cover crops ( Duval et al., 2013Duval ME, Galantini JA, Iglesias JO, Canelo S, Martinez JM, Wall L. Analysis of organic fractions as indicators of soil quality under natural and cultivated systems. Soil Till Res. 2013;131:11-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.03.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.03....
, 2014, 2018). No differences on POCf may indicate slow POCc to POCf turnover. In this study, POCc at 0.00-0.05 m was the physical fraction of SOC most affected by treatment.

Regarding the chemical fractions of SOC, HA and H were the fractions significantly affected by treatment. Humic acids content was around 40 % higher in SCC than in SBF, indicating cover crops residues were incorporated into the HA fraction (Arlauskienė et al., 2010). Other authors found no effect of cover crops on the HA fraction ( Yang et al., 2004Yang Z, Singh BRM, Sitaula BK. Fractions of organic carbon in soils under different crop rotations, cover crops and fertilization practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys. 2004;70:161-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000048479.30593.ea
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.000004847...
; Guimarães et al., 2013), though these studies were performed under different edaphoclimatic conditions. Humins content, in contrast, was 7 % higher for the SBF treatment, with higher values through all the studied profiles and the broader difference observed in the 0.05-0.10 m layer. These results suggest that cover crops may enhance H mineralization and H to HA turnover ( Pausch et al., 2013Pausch J, Zhu B, Kuzyakov Y, Cheng W. Plant inter-species effects on rhizosphere priming of soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;57:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.0...
), even though H represents a more stable and recalcitrant fraction of SOC ( Stevenson, 1994Stevenson FJ. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994. ). Furthermore, in this study the SBF treatment showed a root development strongly restricted to the top 0.05 to 0.08 m of soil, where the presence of platy structure was observed (at variable depth between 0.04 and 0.09 m). The SCC treatment, on the other hand, exhibited a weaker platy structure with abundant roots in deeper layers. In this sense the cover crop may have enhanced H mineralization in deeper layers, as well as SOC redistribution. On the contrary, other authors found an increment in H under cover crops ( Yang et al., 2004Yang Z, Singh BRM, Sitaula BK. Fractions of organic carbon in soils under different crop rotations, cover crops and fertilization practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys. 2004;70:161-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000048479.30593.ea
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.000004847...
; Guimarães et al., 2013), though these studies included more complex or heavily rotated managements, which would explain H buildup.

Fulvic acids content was not significantly affected by cover crop treatment. This result agrees with Yang et al. (2004)Yang Z, Singh BRM, Sitaula BK. Fractions of organic carbon in soils under different crop rotations, cover crops and fertilization practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys. 2004;70:161-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000048479.30593.ea
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.000004847...
and Guimarães et al. (2013), who did not find differences in FA content in the cover crop treatments. Fulvic acids is a labile fraction that can be easily degraded. Also, FA is a mobile fraction that can percolate through the soil profile. Therefore, increments in FA might not be detectable, as it translocates to deeper layers, is mineralized or transformed to a more stable fraction (Guimarães et al., 2013). In this study, HA/FA was higher than 1 for both treatments and at all the studied depths, which indicates loss of the more labile FA fraction (Guimarães et al., 2013).

Relative contribution of different fractions to SOC

The content of SOC and SOC fractions reported in this study, as well as the distribution of SOC between different fractions are within the values reported for similar soils ( Duval et al., 2014Duval ME, De Sá Pereira E, Iglesias JO, Galantini J. Efecto de uso y manejo del suelo sobre las fracciones de carbono orgánico en un Argiudol. Cienc Suelo. 2014;32:105-15. , 2016; Recio-Vázquez et al., 2014). In relation to the effect of treatment on fractions contribution to SOC, POCc/SOC and HA/SOC were, as POCc and HA, affected by treatment, while the rest of the ratios were not affected by treatment. The relative contribution to SOC is, therefore, less sensitive to management induced changes than each fractions content. The POCc/SOC was higher in the SCC treatment due to higher POCc/SOC values for SCC in the 0.00-0.05 m layer. This indicates an increase in SOC lability due to the presence of cover crops ( Duval et al., 2016Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04....
).

Soil physical quality indicators

Eight years of cover cropping in a soybean monoculture caused no significant effect on SPQ. Bulk density and TP measures performed in the top 0.05 m of soil were not affected by treatment nor position. This agrees with Álvarez et al. (2017), who made a revision of 67 studies in the Pampas region and found that cover crop impact on BD was minimal (with decreases or increases not greater than 0.1 Mg m-3). Basche and DeLonge (2017)Basche A, DeLonge M. The impact of continuous living cover on soil hydrologic properties: A meta-analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2017;81:1179-90. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.03.0077
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.03.007...
, in a meta-analysis study, found an overall increase in TP of 8 % with cover crops. However, these authors found no significant effects on TP under the following situations: silt content >30 %, clay content >25 % and time since cover crop inclusion >7 years (conditions similar to this study). Values of TP and BD reported here are similar to those reported by Sasal et al. (2006)Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
and by Villarreal (2018)Villarreal R. Variación temporal de las propiedades físicas del suelo y su impacto en la dinámica del glifosato en suelos bajo siembra directa y labranza convencional [thesis]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2018. for compacted soils with platy surface structure under NT in the same study site. In the SBF treatment, platy structure was observed within the first 0.10 m of soil (beginning at 0.04-0.06 m depth, and 0.02-0.03 m wide). This platy structure strongly limited soybean roots, causing the root system to develop only in the top 0.10 m of soil. In the SCC treatment, this structure was weaker and allowed root penetration. This difference between managements has also been described by Behrends Kraemer and Morrás (2018) for another Argiudoll in the Pampas region. However, no differences in SPQ values between treatments indicate that the effect of cover crops on the platy structure was not enough to improve SPQ indicators. It has been reported that platy structure causes a change in pore orientation and not necessarily in pore volume, which would explain the absence of significant differences in TP and BD ( Lozano et al., 2013Lozano LA, Soracco CG, Cornelis WM, Gabriels D, Sarli GO, Villarreal R. Anisotropy of pore size classes' connectivity related to soil structure under no tillage. Soil Sci. 2013;178:612-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000027
https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000...
). Moreover, Soracco et al. (2015)Soracco CG, Lozano LA, Villarreal R, Palancar TC, Collazo DJ, Sarli GO, Filgueira RR. Effects of compaction due to machinery traffic on soil pore configuration. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2015;39:408-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20140359
https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs2014...
found that static determinations such as BD or TP are not good SPQ indicators, since they cannot account for the connectivity of different pore size classes. Thus, relatively high BD and low TP measured in both treatments can be ascribed to compaction processes in soils that had been 30 years under NT ( Sasal et al., 2017Sasal MC, Hubert Boizardd AE, Andriuloc MG, Wilsona JL. Platy structure development under no-tillage in the northern humid Pampas of Argentina and its impact on runoff. Soil Till Res. 2017;173:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08....
), and under soybean monoculture.

Saturated hydraulic conductivity was not affected by cover crops after eight years. This disagrees with most studies that report that K increases after winter cover cropping both in the long and in the short term ( Keisling et al., 1994Keisling TC, Scott HD, Waddle BA, Williams W, Frans RE. Winter cover crops influence on cotton yield and selected soil properties. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 1994;25:3087-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369250
https://doi.org/10.1080/0010362940936925...
; Blanco-Canqui et al., 2011Blanco-Canqui H, Mikha MM, Presley DR, Claassen MM. Addition of cover crops enhances no-till potential for improving soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011;75:1471-82. https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430
https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430...
, 2015; Álvarez et al., 2017; Haruna et al., 2018Haruna SI, Anderson SH, Nkongolo NV, Zaibon S. Soil hydraulic properties: influence of tillage and cover crops. Pedosphere. 2018;28:430-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60387-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60...
). On a meta-analysis over a wide range of soils, Basche and DeLonge (2019)Basche AD, DeLonge MS. Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis. PloS ONE. 2019;14:e0215702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215702
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.021...
found cover crops generally increased infiltration rates, thought this effect was greater in coarser soils and in drier climatic conditions than those of this study. Other studies report that an intense cover crop growth can reduce K in the winter, as roots clog pores, while later root decay can increase K and porosity ( Carof et al., 2007Carof M, De Tourdonnet S, Coquet Y, Hallaire V, Roger-Estrade J. Hydraulic conductivity and porosity under conventional and no-tillage and the effect of three species of cover crop in northern France. Soil Use Manage. 2007;23:230-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00085.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007...
; Bodner et al., 2008Bodner G, Loiskandl W, Buchan G, Kaul HP. Natural and management-induced dynamics of hydraulic conductivity along a cover-cropped field slope. Geoderma. 2008;146:317-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008....
). In the present study measures were made two months after cover crop was dried, when cover crop roots were still abundant. However, temporal pore clogging does not explain the absence of eight years cumulative effect on K0. This reflects a poor pore system with low connectivity in a soil compacted by years of NT and soybean monoculture (both in the SBF and in the SCC treatments). Reduced K0 can be a consequence of pore destruction by compaction or to the lack of pore generation ( Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
). Furthermore, Lozano (2014)Lozano LA. Desarrollo de estructura laminar del suelo en siembra directa. Factores predisponentes y efectos sobre las propiedades hidráulicas [thesis]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2014. suggested that infiltration was strongly limited because of platy structure's low permeability. Though soil in the SCC treatment showed more favorable visual structural features, these observed differences did not affect significantly SPQ indicators as K0 and effective porosity. This can be attributed to the low ability of silty loam Argiudolls for natural pore regeneration under NT ( Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
). This is due to the abundance of illite clay with low expansive capacity ( Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
), the prevalence of fine silts within the silt fraction ( Taboada et al., 1998Taboada MA, Micucci FG, Cosentino DJ, Lavado RS. Comparison of compaction induced by conventional and zero tillage in two soils of the Rolling Pampa of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 1998;49:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00132-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00...
) and the mild temperate climate, where freeze–thaw processes are negligible ( Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
). No effect on K0 indicates 8 years of cover crops did not improve soil structural features ( Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
; Blanco-Canqui et al., 2015Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086...
). In this study, cover crop had no significant effect on TP, εma, εme nor CWTP.

Also, it has been stated that SPQ is closely related to soil organic matter ( Sasal et al., 2006Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02....
). This suggests that changes in SOC composition induced by the cover crop were not enough to cause a significant effect on SPQ. In this study, cover crops had no effect on SOC content, and did not affect FA and POCf fractions, which have been reported to be the fractions with higher correlation with SPQ indicators (Recio-Vázquez et al., 2014; Duval et al., 2018Duval ME, Galantini JA, Martínez FL. Labile soil organic carbon for assessing soil quality: influence of management practices and edaphic conditions. Catena. 2018;171:316-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07...
). However, rather than discourage the use of cover crops, these results encourage to try more intensified cropping sequences, with more gramineous crops in the sequence, to enhance SOC accumulation and structure improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Winter cover crops in soybean crops under no-tillage in a typical Argiudoll of the Argentinean Pampas, change the content and the relative contribution of different fractions of soil organic carbon. An oat+vetch cover crop did not increase soil organic carbon content in a soybean crop, which indicates that a more balanced rotation between leguminous and gramineous crops may be necessary. The cover crop did increase newer fractions of soil organic carbon. Soil organic carbon contents and soil organic carbon composition were not different when considering the row and the inter-row of the previous crop.

The determination of soil organic carbon fractions is more sensitive to evaluate changes induced by a cover crop in soil organic carbon. More sensitive fractions to treatment were humic acids and coarse particulate organic carbon, which represent intermediate and newer fractions of soil organic carbon, respectively.

Eight years of winter cover crop in a soybean crop under no-tillage did not improve soil physical quality. This was related to initial soil compaction after years of soybean monoculture under no-tillage and to the low ability of silty loam Argiudolls to recover soil physical quality. This also indicates that the possible enhancement of root activity and the increase in some of the fractions of soil organic carbon was not enough to cause changes in soil physical quality, at least for the studied time period.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was founded by grants PICT-2016-0151 and PICT-2017-0202 of ANPCyT and PI+D 11A306 of UNLP. The authors want to thank the staff of Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), EEA Pergamino, for the use of the experiment facility.

REFERENCES

  • Álvarez CR, Costantini AO, Bono A, Taboada MA, Boem FHG, Fernández PL, Prystupa P. Distribution and vertical stratification of carbon and nitrogen in soil under different managements in the Pampean Region of Argentina. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2011;35:1985-94. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832011000600015
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832011000600015
  • Álvarez R, Steinbach HS, De Paepe JL. Cover crop effects on soils and subsequent crops in the pampas: A meta-analysis. Soil Till Res. 2017;170:53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.03.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.03.005
  • Ankeny MD, Ahmed M, Kaspar TC, Horton R. Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1991;55:467-70. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020028x
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020028x
  • Arlauskienė A, Maikštėnienė S, Šlepetienė A. Effect of cover crops and straw on the humic substances in the clay loam Cambisol. Agron Res. 2010;8:397-402.
  • Basche A, DeLonge M. The impact of continuous living cover on soil hydrologic properties: A meta-analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2017;81:1179-90. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.03.0077
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.03.0077
  • Basche AD, DeLonge MS. Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis. PloS ONE. 2019;14:e0215702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215702
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215702
  • Behrends Kraemer F, Morrás HJM. Macroporosity of a Typic Argiudoll with different cropping intensity under no-tillage. Span J Soil Sci. 2018;8:214-35. https://doi.org/10.3232/SJSS.2018.V8.N2.06
    » https://doi.org/10.3232/SJSS.2018.V8.N2.06
  • Behrends Kraemer F, Soria MA, Castiglioni MG, Duval M, Galantini J, Morrás H. Morpho-structural evaluation of various soils subjected to different use intensity under no-tillage. Soil Till Res. 2017;169:124-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.01.013
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.01.013
  • Beltrán MJ, Sainz-Rozas H, Galantini JA, Romaniuk RI, Barbieri P. Cover crops in the Southeastern region of Buenos Aires, Argentina: effects on organic matter physical fractions and nutrient availability. Environ Earth Sci. 2018;77:428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7606-0
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7606-0
  • Benites VM, Madari B, Machado PLOA. Extração e fracionamento quantitativo de substâncias húmicas do solo: um procedimento simplificado de baixo custo. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimiento; 2003. (Comunicado técnico 16).
  • Binet F, Hallaire V, Curmi P. Agricultural practices and the spatial distribution of earthworms in maize fields. Relationships between earthworm abundance, maize plants and soil compaction. Soil Biol Biochem. 1997;29:577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00182-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00182-4
  • Blake GR, Hartge KH. Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis. In: Kluter A, editor. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 - Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison: Soil Science Society of America; 1986. p. 363-75.
  • Blanco-Canqui H, Mikha MM, Presley DR, Claassen MM. Addition of cover crops enhances no-till potential for improving soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011;75:1471-82. https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430
    » https://doi.org/10.2l36/sssaj20l0.0430
  • Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, Shapiro CA, Elmore RW, Francis CA, Hergert GW. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J. 2015;107:2449-74. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086
  • Bodner G, Loiskandl W, Buchan G, Kaul HP. Natural and management-induced dynamics of hydraulic conductivity along a cover-cropped field slope. Geoderma. 2008;146:317-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.012
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.012
  • Calonego JC, Raphael JP, Rigon JP, de Oliveira Neto L, Rosolem CA. Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling. Eur J Agron. 2017;85:31-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
  • Cambardella CA, Elliot ET. Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1992;56:777-83. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x
  • Carof M, De Tourdonnet S, Coquet Y, Hallaire V, Roger-Estrade J. Hydraulic conductivity and porosity under conventional and no-tillage and the effect of three species of cover crop in northern France. Soil Use Manage. 2007;23:230-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00085.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00085.x
  • Carrasco AE, Sánchez NE, Tamagno LE. Modelo agrícola e impacto socio-ambiental en la Argentina: monocultivo y agronegocios. La Plata: Asociación de Universidades Grupo Montevideo y Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2012.
  • Chalise KS, Singh S, Wegner BR, Kumar S, Pérez-Gutiérrez JD, Osborne SL, Nleya T, Guzman J, Rohila JS. Cover crops and returning residue impact on soil organic carbon, bulk density, penetration resistance, water retention, infiltration, and soybean yield. Agron J. 2019;111:99-108. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.03.0213
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.03.0213
  • Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. InfoStat, versión 2008. Argentina: Grupo infostat, fca, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; 2008.
  • Ding G, Liu X, Herbert S, Novak J, Amarasiriwardena D, Xing B. Effect of cover crop management on soil organic matter. Geoderma. 2006;130:229-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.019
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.019
  • Ding G, Novak JM, Amarasiriwardena D, Hunt PG, Xing B. Soil organic matter characteristics as affected by tillage management. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2002;66:421-9. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0421
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0421
  • Domínguez A, Bedano JC. The adoption of no-till instead of reduced tillage does not improve some soil quality parameters in Argentinian Pampas. Appl Soil Ecol. 2016;98:166-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.014
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.014
  • Duval ME, De Sá Pereira E, Iglesias JO, Galantini J. Efecto de uso y manejo del suelo sobre las fracciones de carbono orgánico en un Argiudol. Cienc Suelo. 2014;32:105-15.
  • Duval ME, Galantini JA, Capurro JE, Martínez JM. Winter cover crops in soybean monoculture: Effects on soil organic carbon and its fractions. Soil Till Res. 2016;161:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.006
  • Duval ME, Galantini JA, Iglesias JO, Canelo S, Martinez JM, Wall L. Analysis of organic fractions as indicators of soil quality under natural and cultivated systems. Soil Till Res. 2013;131:11-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.03.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.03.001
  • Duval ME, Galantini JA, Martínez FL. Labile soil organic carbon for assessing soil quality: influence of management practices and edaphic conditions. Catena. 2018;171:316-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.023
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.023
  • Eclesia RP, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB, Rizzotto M, Piñeiro G. Stabilization of new carbon inputs rather than old carbon decomposition determines soil organic carbon shifts following woody or herbaceous vegetation transitions. Plant Soil. 2016;409:99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-9
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2951-9
  • Franzluebbers AJ. Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality. Soil Till Res. 2002;66:95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00018-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00018-1
  • Fronning BE, Thelen KD, Min DH. Use of manure, compost, and cover crops to supplant crop residue carbon in corn stover removed cropping systems. Agron J. 2008;100:1703-10. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0052
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0052
  • Galantini JA. Fraccionamiento de la materia orgánica del suelo. In: Galantini JA, editor. Estudio de las fracciones orgánicas en suelos de Argentina. Bahía Blanca: Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur; 2008. p. 19-39.
  • Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle-size analysis. In: Kluter A, editor. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 - Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison: Soil Science Society of America; 1986. p. 383-411.
  • Guimarães DV, Gonzaga MIS, Silva TO, Silva TL, Silva Dias N, Matias MIS. Soil organic matter pools and carbon fractions in soil under different land uses. Soil Till Res. 2013;126:177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.07.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.07.010
  • Haruna SI, Anderson SH, Nkongolo NV, Zaibon S. Soil hydraulic properties: influence of tillage and cover crops. Pedosphere. 2018;28:430-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60387-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60387-4
  • Hopkins FM, Torn MS, Trumbore SE. Warming accelerates decomposition of decades-old carbon in forest soils. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E1753-61. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120603109
    » https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120603109
  • Imhoff S, Ghiberto PJ, Grioni A, Gay JP. Porosity characterization of Argiudolls under different management systems in the Argentine Flat Pampa. Geoderma. 2010;158:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.005
  • International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications - ISAAA. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2016. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA Brief; 2016. v. 52.
  • Irizar AB, Milesi Delaye LA, Andriulo AE. Projection of soil organic carbon reserves in the Argentine Rolling Pampa under different agronomic scenarios. Relationship of these reserves with some soil properties. Open Agric J. 2015;9:30-41. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/487865
    » https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/487865
  • Jian J, Du X, Reiter MS, Stewart RD. A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;143:107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
  • Keisling TC, Scott HD, Waddle BA, Williams W, Frans RE. Winter cover crops influence on cotton yield and selected soil properties. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 1994;25:3087-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369250
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369250
  • Lal R. Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research. Eur J Soil Sci. 2009;60:158-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01114.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01114.x
  • Lal R, Reicosky DC, Hanson JD. Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming. Soil Till Res. 2007;93:2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.11.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.11.004
  • Lipiec J, Tarkiewicz S, Kossowski J. Soil physical properties and growth of spring barley as related to the degree of compactness of two soils. Soil Till Res. 1991;19:307-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(91)90098-I
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(91)90098-I
  • Lozano LA. Desarrollo de estructura laminar del suelo en siembra directa. Factores predisponentes y efectos sobre las propiedades hidráulicas [thesis]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2014.
  • Lozano LA, Soracco CG, Buda VS, Sarli GO, Filgueira RR. Stabilization of soil hydraulic properties under a long term no-till system. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2014;38:1281-92. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832014000400024
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832014000400024
  • Lozano LA, Soracco CG, Cornelis WM, Gabriels D, Sarli GO, Villarreal R. Anisotropy of pore size classes' connectivity related to soil structure under no tillage. Soil Sci. 2013;178:612-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000027
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000027
  • Mengel DB, Barber SA. Development and distribution of the corn root system under field conditions. Agron J. 1974;66:341-44. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030002x
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030002x
  • Novelli LE, Caviglia OP, Piñeiro G. Increased cropping intensity improves crop residue inputs to the soil and aggregate-associated soil organic carbon stocks. Soil Till Res. 2017;165:128-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.008
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.008
  • Olson KR, Ebelhar SA, Lang JM. Cover crop effects on crop yields and soil organic carbon content. Soil Sci. 2010;175:89-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181cf7959
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181cf7959
  • Pausch J, Zhu B, Kuzyakov Y, Cheng W. Plant inter-species effects on rhizosphere priming of soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;57:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.029
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.029
  • Perroux KM, White I. Designs for disc permeameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1988;52:1205-15. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050001x
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050001x
  • Piñeiro G, Paruelo JM, Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB, Oesterheld M. Grazing effects on belowground C and N stocks along a network of cattle exclosures in temperate and subtropical grasslands of South America. Glob Biogeochem Cy. 2009;23:GB2003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003168
    » https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003168
  • Plaza-Bonilla D, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Cantero-Martínez C. Identifying soil organic carbon fractions sensitive to agricultural management practices. Soil Till Res. 2014;139:19-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01.006
  • Poeplau C, Don A. Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops - A meta-analysis. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2015;200:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024
  • Purakayastha TJ, Rudrappa L, Singh D, Swarup A, Bhadraray S. Long-term impact of fertilizers on soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in maize–wheat–cowpea cropping system. Geoderma. 2008;144:370-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.12.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.12.006
  • Recio-Vázquez L, Almendros G, Knicker H, Carral P, Álvarez A. Multivariate statistical assessment of functional relationships between soil physical descriptors and structural features of soil organic matter in Mediterranean ecosystems. Geoderma. 2014;230:95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.002
  • Restovich SB, Andriulo AE, Portela SI. Introduction of cover crops in a maize–soybean rotation of the Humid Pampas: Effect on nitrogen and water dynamics. Field Crops Res. 2012;128:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.012
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.012
  • Romaniuk R, Beltrán M, Brutti L, Costantini A, Bacigaluppo S, Sainz-Rozas H, Salvagiotti F. Soil organic carbon, macro-and micronutrient changes in soil fractions with different lability in response to crop intensification. Soil Till Res. 2018;181:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.014
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.014
  • Sasal MC, Andriulo AE, Taboada MA. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res. 2006;87:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.025
  • Sasal MC, Hubert Boizardd AE, Andriuloc MG, Wilsona JL. Platy structure development under no-tillage in the northern humid Pampas of Argentina and its impact on runoff. Soil Till Res. 2017;173:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.014
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.014
  • Schnitzer M. Organic matter characterization. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 - Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd ed. Madison: Soil Science Society of America; 1982. p. 581-94.
  • Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil. 2002;241:155-76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
    » https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
  • Six J, Jastrow JD. Organic matter turnover. In: Lal R, editor. Encyclopedia of soil science. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002. p. 936-42.
  • Soil Survey Staff. Keys to soil taxonomy. 12th ed. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service; 2014.
  • Soracco CG, Lozano LA, Villarreal R, Palancar TC, Collazo DJ, Sarli GO, Filgueira RR. Effects of compaction due to machinery traffic on soil pore configuration. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2015;39:408-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20140359
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20140359
  • Stevenson FJ. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
  • Taboada MA, Barbosa OA, Cosentino DJ. Null creation of air-filled structural pores by soil cracking and shrinkage in silty loamy soils. Soil Sci. 2008;173:130-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31815d8e9d
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31815d8e9d
  • Taboada MA, Micucci FG, Cosentino DJ, Lavado RS. Comparison of compaction induced by conventional and zero tillage in two soils of the Rolling Pampa of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 1998;49:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00132-9
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00132-9
  • Varela MF, Scianca CM, Taboada MA, Rubio G. Cover crop effects on soybean residue decomposition and P release in no-tillage systems of Argentina. Soil Till Res. 2014;143:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05.005
  • Villarreal R. Variación temporal de las propiedades físicas del suelo y su impacto en la dinámica del glifosato en suelos bajo siembra directa y labranza convencional [thesis]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2018.
  • Wagger MG, Denton HP. Influence of cover crop and wheel traffic on soil physical properties in continuous no-till corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1989;53:1206-10. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300040036x
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300040036x
  • Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-38.
  • Watson KW, Luxmoore RJ. Estimating macroporosity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1986;50:578-82. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x
  • Yang Z, Singh BRM, Sitaula BK. Fractions of organic carbon in soils under different crop rotations, cover crops and fertilization practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys. 2004;70:161-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000048479.30593.ea
    » https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000048479.30593.ea

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    11 Dec 2020
  • Date of issue
    2020

History

  • Received
    31 May 2020
  • Accepted
    14 Sept 2020
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo Secretaria Executiva , Caixa Postal 231, 36570-000 Viçosa MG Brasil, Tel.: (55 31) 3899 2471 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: sbcs@ufv.br