Litterfall production, decomposition and litter nutrient contents in a mined area revegetated with different forest species

ABSTRACT

Afforestation of sites disturbed after bauxite mining is the favorite technique to restore all ecosystem functions. The nature of the tree species used for revegetation of post-mining land can accelerate the recovery of soil organic matter and nutrient cycles. This study aimed to determine the litterfall production, decomposition rate and nutrient content from three types of forest cover ( Eucalyptus , Anadenanthera peregrina , mixed plantation of 16 native species) planted in a bauxite mining area in recovery. Litterfall production was evaluated monthly over 30 months, and the litter mass was assessed twice a year (dry and rainy periods). Total nutrient content was determined from samples grouped by period (dry and rainy). The annual average values for litterfall dry mass and litter mass were higher in Eucalyptus and mixed native. The period (dry or rainy) did not influence litterfall rates in A. peregrina , but Eucalyptus and mixed native presented higher amounts for litterfall during the rainy and dry periods, respectively. Litter accumulation in Eucalyptus was not affected by the season of the year, but mixed native and A. peregrina presented higher litter accumulation in the dry season. Apparent decomposition rates of A. peregrina and mixed native were higher in the rainy season, highlighting the A. peregrina with the highest values compared with the other forest covers. The mixed native presented the highest leaf content of P, K, Ca and Mg in both the litterfall and litter mass, while Eucalyptus had the lowest P, K, Ca, S and N content and the highest C content in the litterfall. Litterfall production is important in degraded areas to ensure the nutrient return to the soil. The data obtained suggest that the cultivation of a mixed of 16 native trees contribute for produce the higher annual litterfall yields, besides produces leaf litterfall of better nutritional quality in relation to P, K, Ca, Mg and S. Therefore, mixed of native trees can be a promising option for reactivation of nutrient cycling and organic matter formation in mined area of bauxite in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.

land reclamation; litter; Eucalyptus; Brazilian Atlantic Forest

INTRODUCTION

Mining activities result in loss of soil and plant cover and ecosystem malfunction ( Shrestha and Lal, 2011 ; Borges et al., 2019 ) leading to the degradation of thousands of hectares worldwide ( Machado et al., 2013 ). In degraded environments, the removal of the superficial soil layer eliminates the litter and also the natural seed bank, resulting in a reduction of the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients and loss of the soil quality and efficient mechanisms for the natural regeneration of plant cover ( Celentano et al., 2011 ; Machado et al., 2016 ).

Recovery of physicochemical and biological soil properties in mined sites is challenging. Furthermore, the high incidence of erosion, combined with poor soil fertility and low organic matter content, often limit vegetation growth and delay the restoration of ecosystems ( Wantzen and Mol, 2013 ; Ahirwal and Maiti, 2021 ; Valente et al., 2023 ). An alternative for restoring the soil quality in degraded areas is establishing forest cover using native or exotic species that promote fast revegetation of the area ( Lanuza et al., 2018 ). However, information about the potential of exotic and forest species to apport litter and nutrient to the soil in mining areas are still scarce.

The input and decomposition of litter from forest species are fundamental for reactivating the biogeochemical cycling and increase the soil fertility in terrestrial ecosystems ( Celentano et al., 2011 ; León and Osorio, 2014 ; Agus et al., 2016 ; Silva et al., 2018 ; Feng et al., 2019 ; Giweta, 2020 ), especially in tropical soils with a low level of nutrients ( Tang et al., 2010 ; Ge et al., 2013 ). Therefore, quantifying the litter production, chemical quality and decomposition is useful for evaluating and monitoring rehabilitated forests ( Silva et al., 2018 ; Giweta, 2020 ), which can increase the chances of success in the recovery process of mined areas. Notwithstanding all other factors, sustainable rehabilitation partly depends on establishing and maintaining a supply of plant-available macronutrients (N, P, and K) that are deficient in disturbed sites after bauxite mining. For instance, Worlanyo and Jiangfeng (2021) indicated that during the early stages of rehabilitation (<5 years of age), the vegetation might be P limited, while in older rehabilitation, N limitation may be manifesting, especially for the non-legume species.

In Brazil, mining is an important economic activity, but it can also negatively affect the environment and society. For instance, the recent dan collapse in Minas Gerais State, in 2019, resulted in the loss of 133 ha of native vegetation and 71 ha of permanent protection areas along with watercourses in the Atlantic Forest biome, the 5th hotspot of biodiversity in the world ( Myers et al., 2000 ; Thompson et al., 2020 ). This fact reinforces the need to identify forest species and practices that can foster the recovery of areas degraded by mining activity that improve soil recovery and reactivate natural nutrient cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the litterfall production and decomposition rate, as well as nutrient return to the soil, in plantations of Eucalyptus , Anandenthera peregrina, and the mixed native species planted to cover an area of bauxite mining in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and experimental design

The study was carried out in São Sebastião da Vargem Alegre, Minas Gerais, Brazil (21° 1’ 58” S and 42° 35’ 8” W, 780 m altitude), in an area of bauxite extraction. The predominant climate is Cwa (Köppen Classification System), with hot and rainy summers and a well-defined dry season. The average annual precipitation and temperature are 1,287 mm and 20.3 °C, respectively ( Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia - Inmet, 2016 ). The soils were classified as Latossolo Vermelho Amarelo distrófico típico ( Santos et al., 2018 ), which corresponds to a Ferralsols Orthidystric ( IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015 ). After mining, the soil surface layer (0.00-0.20 m) was stored for approximately one year. Then, it was returned to the area during topographic reconfiguration, followed by decompaction with a subsoiler at 0.60 m soil depth.

The experiment was installed in March 2011 using a randomized block design with split plots and three replicates with different forest species ( Table 1 ). The plots (40 × 18 m) comprised three different forest cover treatments: (1) monoculture of Anadenanthera peregrina (L.) Speg ( A. peregrina ); (2) monoculture of Eucalyptus ; and (3) mixed plantation with 16 species, including pioneer and non-pioneer native species from Atlantic forest biome (mixed native). The Eucalyptus and A. peregrina species were planted by 3 × 2 m, and the mixed native species in Quincunx (4 pioneers rounding a climax specie in the center) spaced 2.0 × 1.5 m. The mixed native seedlings were produced from seeds collected in fragments of Atlantic Forest (Woodland). In this study, we used two subplots (10 × 18 m) with different fertilization treatments: ( i ) standard fertilization (SF) used by the company in their rehabilitation activities of mined areas; and ( ii ) a combination of SF with organic fertilization (OF) and chemical fertilization (CF).

Table 1
Description of the plots identifying the monocultures composed of A. peregrina and Eucalyptus and a mixed plantation of 16 native species (mixed native) and subplots with standard fertilization (SF) and a combination of SF with organic fertilization (OF) and chemical fertilization (CF)

Treatments/Plots		Forest species	Phenology
A. peregrina		Anadenanthera peregrina (L.) Speg	Deciduous
Eucalyptus		Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis	Evergreen
Mixed native	Pioneer	Anadenanthera peregrina (L.) Speg	Deciduous
		Ficus insipida Willd – Fi	Semi-deciduous
		Inga edulis Mart. – Ie	Semi-deciduous
		Piptadenia gonoacantha (Mart.) JF Macbr. - Pg	Semi-deciduous
		Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Vell.) Morong.- Ec	Deciduous
		Ceiba speciosa (A. St.-Hil.) Ravenna - Cs	Deciduous
		Sapindus saponaria L. – Ss	Evergreen or semi-deciduous
		Pera glabrata (Schott) Poepp. Ex Baill.- Pgl	Evergreen
	Non-pioneer	Trichilia sp – Tsp	Semi-deciduous
		Cupania oblongifolia Mart. – Co	Evergreen or semi-deciduous
		Apuleia leiocarpa (Vogel) JF Macbr. - Al,	Deciduous
		Handroanthus chrysotrichus (Mart. Ex A. DC.) Mattos – Hc	Deciduous
		Hymenaea courbaril var. stilbocarpa (Hayne) YT Lee and Langenh – Hcs	Semi-deciduous
		Lecythis sp – Ls	Semi-deciduous
		Paubrasilia echinata Lam. – Pe	Semi-deciduous
		Annona squamosa L. – As.	Deciduous
Subplots		Fertilization, place and proportion of application
SF		2.0 Mg ha-1 dolomitic limestone: Eucalyptus and A. peregrina: 25 % - planting holes and 75 % between the rows; and mixed native: 50 % - planting hole and 50 % between the rows. 30.0 Mg ha-1 poultry litter (fresh, 30 % moisture): Eucalyptus and A. peregrina - 22 % in the planting hole and 78 % between the rows; and mixed native - 44 % in the planting hole and 56 % between the rows).
SF+(OF+CF)		5.0 Mg ha-1 dolomitic limestone: Eucalyptus and A. peregrina: 25 % - planting holes and 75 % between the rows; and mixed native: 50 % - planting hole and 50 % between the rows). 60.0 Mg ha-1 poultry litter (fresh, 30 % moisture). Eucalyptus and A. peregrina - 22 % in the planting hole and 78 % between the rows; and mixed native - 44 % in the planting hole and 56 % between the rows. 0.75 Mg ha-1 ( Eucalyptus and A. peregrina ) or 1.5 t ha-1 (mixed native) of Bayovar natural reactive phosphate (100 % in the planting holes). 1st top-dressing fertilization (1 month before planting): Eucalyptus and A. peregrina: 10 kg ha-1 of N, 22 kg ha-1 of P, and 8 kg ha-1; and mixed native: 20 kg ha-1 of N, 44 kg ha-1 of P, and 16 kg ha-1 of K). 2nd top-dressing fertilization (10 months before planting): Eucalyptus and A. peregrina - 67 kg ha-1 of N, 17 kg ha-1 of P, and 67 kg ha-1 of K +1.7 kg ha-1 of B, 0.8 kg ha-1 of Zn, 0.8 kg ha-1 of Cu; and mixed native - 134 kg ha-1 of N, 34 kg ha-1 of P, and 134 kg ha-1 of K to the mixed native + (3.4 kg ha-1 of B, 1.6 kg ha-1 of Zn, 1.6 kg ha-1 of Cu).

Litterfall interception and litter mass accumulation on the ground

To evaluate the litterfall production, we installed suspended collectors above the ground in October 2013, when the plants were 31 months old. We installed three collectors of nylon (1 mm mesh) between the planting rows in each subplot (54 collectors in total), with each collector presenting an 8 × 0.5 m (4 m²) area at the height of 0.5 m from the ground. The large area of the collectors aimed to better represent the different trees species in the study. We collected the litter production monthly for 30 consecutive months, and the litterfall collected was weighed and homogenized and then separated into leaves+reproductive structures (leaf litterfall) and twigs. Each component was weighed before and after oven drying at 65 °C for 48 h to determine the dry weight, and then stored for chemical characterization.

We also estimated the litter remaining and accumulated on the ground at the end of the dry period (September 2014 and September 2015) and the rainy period (March 2014, March 2015, and March 2016). To do this, we randomly threw five times a frame (0.5 × 0.5 m) on the soil and collected the litter deposited inside the frame. The litter mass was weighed, and all five samples were mixed and homogenized. From this material, we collected a composed sample that was further separated into leaves reproductive structures (leaf litter) and twigs (twig litter), and weighed before and after oven drying at 65 °C for 48 h to determine the dry matter weight chemical characterization.

The apparent decomposition ratio of the litter was estimated by the ratio of litter production and litter mass on the ground at the end of the dry and rainy periods ( Olson, 1963 ; Sales et al., 2020 ), according to equation 1.

$k=Mt/Mr$ Eq. 1

in which: k is the decomposition rate in kg year^-1; Mt is the sum of the mean monthly weight in kg ha^-1 of the litterfall in the collectors during the dry or rainy period; and Mr is the mean weight in kg ha^-1 of the litter mass remaining on the ground at the end of the dry or rainy period. The annual litter production and litter mass (kg ha^-1 yr^-1) were calculated as the ratio of the sum of monthly litterfall or litter mass by the period of 2.5 years (equivalent to the 30 months of experimental evaluation). We also calculated the average litterfall production and litter mass for the rainy and dry seasons, considering three rainy and two dry seasons, each one with six months during the experimental evaluation period.

Chemical characterization of the litterfall and litter mass

For the chemical characterization, we grouped the litterfall components by season (dry or rainy), considering the proportion of monthly litterfall contribution in the collectors. All samples were ground in a Wiley-type mill and then submitted to nitric-perchloric digestion to determine the K content (flame photometry); P content (colorimetry, by the vitamin C method, modified by Braga and Defelipo (Braga and Defelipo, 1974); and Ca, Mg and S content (atomic absorption spectroscopy). We determined the total nutrient content (kg ha^-1) of leaf and twig from litterfall and litter mass by multiplying the total nutrient content from each component by the dry mass in the rainy and dry seasons ( Vitousek and Sanford, 1986 ; Tang et al., 2010 ).

Statistical analysis of the data consisted of the Shapiro-Wilk test to verify the normality, Bartlett test to verify the homogeneity of variances, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA). When statistical significance was reached (p<0.05), the means were compared by Tukey’s test at 10 % probability to analyse the effect of fertilization and forest cover litterfall production and litter mass from the different components, as well the total nutrient content. All statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistica 7.0 software ( Statsoft 2012 ).

RESULTS

Litterfall production and litter mass on the ground

A. peregrina presented the lowest litterfall production (3,950 ± 593 kg ha^-1 yr^-1) and differed significantly from Eucalyptus (8,324 ± 1,979 kg ha^-1 yr^-1) and mixed native (6,322 ± 608 kg ha^-1 yr^-1, p<0.10) ( Figure 1a ). Leaves were the main component of litterfall in A. peregrina (77 %), Eucalyptus (67 %), and mixed native (84 %) with a similar pattern over the studied period ( Figures 1b and 1c ).

Figure 1
Total monthly interception of litterfall (a), leaves(b), twigs (c), litterfall components (leaf and twigs) (d and e) at the rainy and dry periods from Eucalyptus , A. peregrina and from a mixed plantation of native species (mixed native), during 30 months, in an area of bauxite mining in rehabilitation. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Uppercase letters compare different types of cover for each period (dry or rainy), while lowercase letters compare each type of forest cover in the dry and rainy periods, and when similar, indicate no significant differences by Tukey’s test at 10 %. Values above the bars indicate litterfall quantities.

Total litterfall production and the influence of precipitation are shown in figure 1 . The rainy season in the state of Minas Gerais comprises the months from October to March and the dry season from April to September. While the seasons influenced the litterfall production in Eucalyptus and mixed native, this pattern was not found for A. peregrina . The highest litterfall production occurred in the rainy season for Eucalyptus , while mixed native achieved the same values only in the dry period ( Figures 1a , 1d and 1e ). The leaves followed a similar pattern during the dry and rainy seasons compared with the total litterfall, with and A. peregrina presenting the lowest values for both periods. Although mixed native and Eucalyptus showed similar patterns concerning leaf production across the year, twigs presented higher quantities during the wet season for Eucalyptus and the A. peregrina and mixed native did not differ as regards the quantity of twig litterfall. The ANOVA showed no significant effects (p>0.10) on the interaction between types of fertilization and litter production from the different forest covers. Therefore, we used the mean values of litter production from the treatments SF and OF+CF.

Annual mean value for litter mass in A. peregrina (5,717.12 ± 811.37 kg ha^-1 yr^-1) was significantly lower (p<0.10) than in Eucalyptus (15,658.46 ± 3209.51 kg ha^-1 yr^-1) and mixed native (12,508.69 ± 721.57 kg ha^-1 yr^-1) ( Figure 2a ), with no difference between Eucalyptus and mixed native. Leaf litter was the main component in A. peregrina (62 %) and mixed native (79 %), and 50 % in Eucalyptus , which also presented the highest percentage of twig litter in each sampling ( Figures 2a , 2b , and 2c ). There was no difference in litter mass in Eucalyptus considering seasonality ( Figures 2d and 2e ), whereas A. peregrina and mixed native showed higher values during the dry period. Nevertheless, Eucalyptus had the highest accumulation of litter mass in the rainy period, followed by mixed native and A. peregrina . During the dry period, there was no difference between Eucalyptus and mixed native. The forest cover A. peregrina presented the smallest accumulation of litter mass all year. Analysing the litter components, we found that A. peregrina and mixed native produce the highest accumulation of leaves during the dry season, while Eucalyptus had the highest values for twigs, differing from A. peregrina and mixed native during both periods.

Figure 2
Total l litter mass (a), leaf (b) and twigs (c) at the dry and rainy months, litter components (leaf and twigs) (d and e) during the dry and rainy periods from Eucalyptus , A. peregrina and a mixed plantation of native species (mixed native), during 30 months, in an area of bauxite mining in rehabilitation. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 3). Uppercase letters compare the different types of cover for each period (dry or rainy), while lowercase letters compare forest cover between the dry and rainy periods, and when similar, indicate no significant differences by Tukey’s test at 10 %. Values above the bars indicate total litter.

Decomposition of the litter mass and its components

A. peregrina showed the highest apparent decomposition rate (k: 0.7 kg yr^-1) during the rainy period ( Figure 3 ), around three times bigger than the other species studied. Nevertheless, no differences were observed between A. peregrina and the other types of cover in the dry period. We also did not identify differences in the decomposition rate of litter, leaf-litter and twigs in Eucalyptus did between seasons. Moreover, the decomposition rate of twigs did not vary with the forest cover and period of the year.

Figure 3
Apparent decomposition rates for litter, leaf litter and twigs during the dry and rainy periods from Eucalyptus , A. peregrina, and a mixed plantation of native species (mixed native), during 30 months, in an area of bauxite mining in rehabilitation. Uppercase letters compare the different types of cover for each of the seasons (dry or rainy), while lowercase letters compare each type of forest cover between the dry and rainy seasons, and when similar, indicate no significant differences by Tukey’s test at 10 %. Values above the bars indicate the total decomposition rate.

Total nutrient content of the litterfall and the litter mass

Native forest species (mixed native) presented the higher total content of P, K, Ca, Mg and S in the leaves of the litterfall in both seasons, with the higher values in the dry period ( Table 2 ). A. peregrina and Eucalyptus did not present differences in the content of P and S of the litterfall leaf, but A. peregrina had the lowest values of K and Ca in the rainy season and Mg in both seasons. We found the highest C/N ratio of the litterfall leaf in Eucalyptus and the lowest in A. peregrina . The highest content of P, K, Ca, Mg, S and C in twigs were observed in the rainy season for Eucalyptus , while A. peregrina and mixed native presented similar values. The three forest covers presented similar N contents from litterfall twigs in the rainy season, but mixed native presented the highest N values in the driest period. Similar to leaf litterfall, the twigs of the Eucalyptus litterfall showed the highest C/N ratio among the forest cover studied, followed by mixed native.

Table 2
Total nutrient content of the leaves and twigs from litterfall and litter mass in A. peregrina, Eucalyptus and a mixed plantation of native species (mixed native), at the dry and rainy periods in an area of bauxite mining in rehabilitation

Forest Cover	Season	P	K	Ca	Mg	S	C	N	C/N
		----------------------------------------------------------------------kg ha-1----------------------------------------------------------------------
		Leaf litterfall
A. peregrina	Rainy	1.9 Ba	8.3 Ca	12.9 Ca	2.2 Ca	1.7 Bb	723.2 Ba	36.4 Aa	19.9 Ca
	Dry	1.3 Bb	8.5 Ba	16.6 Ba	2.3 Ca	1.9 Ba	724.2 Ba	37.0 Ba	19.8 Ca
Eucalyptus	Rainy	2.0 Ba	12.0 Ba	22.4 Ba	4.5 Ba	1.7 Ba	1369.9 Aa	24.6 Ba	55.1 Aa
	Dry	1.5 Bb	11.1 Ba	23.4 Ba	4.2 Ba	1.6 Bb	1192.3 Aa	22.8 Ca	52.6 Ab
Mixed native species	Rainy	2.7 Ab	15.3 Ab	31.9 Ab	6.1 Ab	2.9 Ab	1020.8 ABb	41.9 Ab	24.4 Ba
	Dry	3.0 Aa	24.1 Aa	45.0 Aa	8.2 Aa	3.6 Aa	1348.0 Aa	58.1 Aa	23.2 Ba
		Twig litterfall
A. peregrina	Rainy	0.4 Ba	3.2 Ba	7.5 Ba	0.7 Ba	0.4 Ba	206.9 Ba	7.5 Aa	29.6 Ba
	Dry	0.2 Ab	3.2 Aa	7.6 ABa	0.5 Ba	0.3 Ba	178.0 Ba	6.9 Aa	26.3 Ca
Eucalyptus	Rainy	0.5 Aa	5.1 Aa	14.2 Aa	1.7 Aa	0.7 Aa	692.9 Aa	6.2 Aa	111.6 Ab
	Dry	0.2 Ab	3.1 Ab	9.2 Aa	1.4 Aa	0.4 ABb	470.2 Ab	4.7 Ba	100.9 Aa
Mixed native species	Rainy	0.3 Ba	3.0 Ba	8.2 Ba	1.4 Ba	0.5 Ba	221.5 Ba	6.6 Aa	33.4 Ba
	Dry	0.2 Ab	2.3 Aa	6.0 Ba	1.1 ABa	0.5 Aa	200.9 Ba	5.6 ABa	36.7 Ba
		Leaf litter mass
A. peregrina	Rainy	0.8 Bb	3.9 Bb	19.8 Bb	1.8 Bb	1.2 Ba	531.1 Bb	24.7 Bb	21.7 Ba
	Dry	3.2 Ba	28.7 Ba	95.7 Ba	10.0 Ba	4.6 Ba	2585.7 Ba	106.6 Ba	24.1 Ba
Eucalyptus	Rainy	4.0 Aa	7.0 ABb	73.6 Aa	10.4 Aa	5.8 Aa	2959.5 Aa	80.4 Aa	37.2 Ab
	Dry	4.2 Ba	14.1 Ca	82.6 Ba	12.3 Ba	5.0 Ba	3518.0 Ba	79.3 Ba	44.6 Aa
Mixed native species	Rainy	3.9 Ab	12.9 Ab	98.6 Ab	11.7 Ab	6.7 Ab	1871.8 Ab	99.5 Ab	18.8 Ba
	Dry	10.0 Aa	43.6 Aa	296.1 Aa	29.5 Aa	18.2 Aa	6005.4 Aa	293.6 Aa	20.6 Ca
		Twig litter mass
A. peregrina	Rainy	0.5 Aa	4.2 Ba	24.2 ABa	2.4 Ba	1.2 Aa	647.5 Ba	27.0 Aa	24.7 Ba
	Dry	0.7 Aa	5.9 Ba	35.8 Aa	3.1 Ba	1.6 Ba	957.1 Ba	40.3 Aa	24.2 Ba
Eucalyptus	Rainy	1.0 Aa	8.0 Aa	35.9 Aa	6.0 Aa	2.0 Aa	2163.0 Aa	35.3 Aa	59.5 Aa
	Dry	1.1 Aa	10.3 Aa	40.7 Aa	6.2 Aa	2.1 Aba	2720.0 Aa	38.0 Aa	77.3 Aa
Mixed native species	Rainy	0.6 Ab	4.3 Ba	21.7 Bb	3.1 Bb	1.5 Ab	353.4 Bb	11.6 Ab	29.5 Ba
	Dry	1.2 Aa	7.2 ABa	37.8 Aa	5.3 Aa	2.7 Aa	1362.0 Ba	37.6 Aa	37.0 Ba

• Upper case letters in a column compare between the different types of forest cover for each of the seasons, while lowercase letters compare each type of cover between the dry and rainy seasons, and when similar, indicate no significant differences by Tukey’s test at 10 %.

Native forest cover (mixed native) presented the highest nutrient content of leaf litter mass in the dry season for all nutrients studied. There was no difference in the nutrient content of the leaf litter mass during the rainy period between Eucalyptus and mixed native, and Eucalyptus showed the highest C/N ratio in the leaf litter mass ( Table 2 ). The P and N contents in the twigs-litter mass did not differ between the forest covers throughout the year, but the season influenced the nutrient content of the twig litter mass in mixed native, which presented the highest values of P, Ca, Mg, S, C and N in the dry season. The C/N ratio of the twig litter was higher for Eucalyptus , not being influenced by the time of year.

DISCUSSION

Litterfall and litter mass by type of forest cover

Growth rate and productivity of forests influence the production of litterfall ( Wang et al., 2008 ; Barliza et al., 2019 ; Feng et al., 2019 ). The mixed with native species has a slow growth with a diameter at the ground level varying from 8.66 to 10.41 cm and a mean base area from 0.0092 to 0.0118 m² compared with Eucalyptus . However, it presented litter production similar to Eucalyptus , which can be explained by its higher diversity of species (pioneer and no-pioneer) with different phenology ( Valente et al., 2021 ). Several studies report that species diversity in forest plantations is associated with higher annual litterfall production ( Gama-Rodrigues et al., 2007 ; Wang et al., 2007 ; Tang et al., 2010 ). These results agree with Miranda Neto et al. (2015), who studied litterfall production in a mining area in recovery with native forest species in Minas Gerais, Brazil. After nine years, these authors found an annual litterfall production of 6772 ± 1940 kg ha^-1. The leaf litterfall represented 67 to 84 % of total litterfall production, similar to results also found in planted forests in Brazil by Silva et al. (2018) and Souza et al. (2019) and worldwide by Agus et al. (2016) .

Trees with a larger diameter, height and basal area tend to present a greater contribution of litter as Eucalyptus (a fast-growing three) and some other native species with different annual growth rates, especially in the early stages of succession ( Souza et al., 2019 ). The mixed of native species includes some pioneering, fast-growing species (such as Ceiba speciosa , Enterolobium contortisiliquum and Piptadenia gonoacantha ), which resemble Eucalyptus in their base area, and lose a large part of their leaves during the dry season. So, the fast litterfall production ( Valente et al., 2021 ) with higher growth rates in the Eucalyptus treatment could be compensated by the plant density (3,333 trees per hectare) and biodiversity of the mixed native treatment, as commented by some authors already cited. Eucalyptus trees increased from 16.63 to 19.76 cm and from 0.0221 to 0.0313 m² in diameter at ground level and mean base area, respectively, after 2.5 years of the study period, considering a density of 120 individuals in the study area ( Valente et al., 2021 ).

The smaller litter production of A. peregrina treatment can be attributed to its phenology, characterized by leaflets of small sizes. Also, the slow growth of only 2.26 cm in diameter at the ground during the period of litterfall production evaluation could be attributed to the results obtained ( Valente et al., 2021 ).

The higher litterfall production of native species and, especially, Eucalyptus can improve the rehabilitation of degraded areas. The rapid surface cover can enhance the soil cover, reduce soil erosion and improve the soil structure by trees’ roots and the formation of soil organic matter ( Borges et al., 2019 ; Cavalcante et al., 2019 ).

The total litter mass is the result of litterfall production and the decomposition rate ( Martius et al., 2004 ; León and Osorio, 2014 ), and can be influenced by litterfall and soil chemical composition ( Parsons et al., 2014 ), as well by the season of the year ( Souza et al., 2019 ). Eucalyptus and mixed native presented higher annual litterfall production and litter mass accumulation in soil. Although there is a predominance of leaves litterfall, the concentration of twigs increased in the litter mass due to its low decomposition rates compared with the leaves.

Seasonality of litterfall production

Environmental variables such as temperature and radiation are limiting factors to litterfall production, which response can vary according to the forest cover in tropical regions ( Zhang et al., 2014 ). Eucalyptus presented the highest value of litterfall production during the rainy period (October to March of the years studied), which may be related to water availability that leads to more vegetative growth the internal translocation of nutrients from the older tissue to the younger, and consequently higher discarding of leaves and other older components of the tree. This can be pronounced by the young age of the population when the study was started (31 months). However, the increase of litterfall in the rainy season can be attributed to the increase in twigs litterfall due to the physical impact of rain on the trees ( Zhang et al., 2014 ).

The increase of litterfall production of native species found in this study during the dry season (April to September of the years studied) has also been reported by Miranda Neto et al. (2015) in an area of bauxite mining in the process of recovery with native Atlantic Forest species, and in other studies of litterfall production in tropical forests in Brazil ( Smith et al., 1998 ; Barlow et al., 2007 ) and worldwide ( Tang et al., 2010 ; Zhang et al., 2014 ). During the dry period, leaf abscission occurs as a mechanism of plant adaptation to water stress, increasing the mean litterfall production in this period (Jha and Prasad Mohapatra, 2010). Litterfall production by forest species may be related to the perennial or deciduous characteristics of the trees ( Souza et al., 2019 ). The phenology of the species used in the mixed plantation of forest species (mixed native) in this study has a predominance of deciduous and semi-deciduous species of the Atlantic Forest ( Table 1 ) that lose their leaves during the dry period. This explains the higher leave litterfall production during this period ( Souza et al., 2019 ). Soils of mined areas impose physical barriers to the root growth of trees and also stimulate leaf fall, limiting the access to water and nutrients ( Sheoran et al., 2010 ). This effect is more evident on the species most susceptible to loss of (deciduous) leaves, which makes the mixture of deciduous, semi-deciduous and perennial species essential for success in programs for the recovery of degraded areas as proposed in the present study.

The production and decomposition rate of the litter influence the accumulation of litter mass. In this study, Eucalyptus was the forest cover that most accumulated litter mass during the rainy period (12,545 kg ha^-1), followed by mixed native (7,330 kg ha^-1) and A. peregrina (2,297 kg ha^-1). Souza and Davide (2001) found an accumulation of around 63,320 kg ha^-1 in plantations of Eucalyptus saligna with 12 years of age in an area of bauxite mining values in the same study region. In the dry period, mixed native and Eucalyptus showed similar values of accumulated litter in the soil, since they also produced similar amounts of litterfall in the same period of the year and presented similar rates of decomposition. The period of less water availability in the soil leads to leaf abscission, increasing the supply of litterfall to the soil, which is common to perennial species such as Eucalyptus and also, the majority of deciduous and semi-deciduous. Besides the higher contribution to the soil, the decomposition rate also influences the accumulation of litter on the ground ( Martius et al., 2004 ; Sales et al., 2020 ).

Apparent decomposition rate and seasonality

Litter decomposition is the main factor that controls the accumulation of litter mass and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems ( Krishna and Mohan, 2017 ; Feng et al., 2019 ; Souza et al., 2019 ). In our study, we found that seasonality affected the decomposition rate, with higher values in the rainy season, as also observed by Miranda Neto et al. (2015). The favorable conditions of temperature and humidity in the rainy season stimulate soil microbial activity and, consequently, increase the decomposition rate ( Pandey et al., 2007 ; Krishna and Mohan, 2017 ). The higher decomposition rate of the leaf litter in A. peregrina compared to the other types of cover in the rainy season may be related to the small size of leaflets and nutrient content, which facilitate the process of decomposition by soil microorganisms ( Krishna and Mohan, 2017 ; Sousa-Neto et al., 2017 ). A litter with a higher content of lignin and C/N ratio tends to present a lower decomposition rate ( Bachega et al., 2016 ; Cotrufo and Lavallee, 2022 ). The A. peregrina litter has a high concentration of N and a lower C/N ratio compared to other types of cover, which contributes to an increase in the decomposition rate.

The decomposition rate of Eucalyptus in the rainy season (0.37 yr^-1) and dry season (0.25 yr^-1) was higher than the value of 0.11 yr^-1 found by Souza and Davide (2001) , but smaller than 0.54 yr^-1 for E. urophylla x E. globulus maideni ( Schumacher et al., 2013 ), and 0.51, 0.59 and 1.0 yr^-1 for E. pelita, E. camaldulensis and E. grandis respectively ( Zaia and Gama-Rodrigues, 2004 ). The low N content in the leaf litter from Eucalyptus is one of the factors that limit its decomposition ( Krishna and Mohan, 2017 ).

Although the mixed native species present a higher diversity, we did not found differences in the decomposition rates compared with Eucalyptus , highlighting the importance of the litterfall quality over the species diversity in affecting the decomposition rate ( Meier and Bowman, 2008 ; Tang et al., 2010 ; Cizungu et al., 2014 ). Under the same condition, mass loss is directly proportional to the C/N lignin/N ratios ( Cotrufo and Lavallee, 2022 ) and C/P ratios. The composition of litterfall is strongly related to their recalcitrance and, consequently, so higher or lower rates of decomposition ( Barlow et al., 2007 ; Duarte et al., 2013 ; Cizungu et al., 2014 ; Sales et al., 2020 ). The process of decomposition can also be influenced by the microbial composition community ( Yang et al., 2014 ), soil fertility ( Cotrufo et al., 2010 ), especially N, and the soil structure, which is intensively modified in mining areas (Miranda Neto et al., 2015). However, rehabilitation strategies that increase the soil nutrients by poultry litter and chemical fertilizers ( Table 1 ) and, consequently, the composition of litter favor the microorganism’s activity and the decomposition should be not limited by nutrients. Most of the native species’ litterfall was produced in the dry season, while Eucalyptus was in the wet season, with much more twigs than leaves. So, the decomposition rates reflect a situation where the native species litterfall already are in an advanced stage of physical decomposition by environment components such as arthropods when the wet season starts, while the Eucalyptus litterfall is not (it is higher during the wet season). Accumulating lignin in litter over time, factors controlling the microbial degradation of lignin become a key quality parameter ( Cotrufo et al., 2010 ), and as twigs (the size and thickness are bigger than leaves) have proportionally much more lignin than leaves. Leaves are the most abundant and fastest decomposing part of the litter, and improving our understanding about its production and decomposition rate becomes a key factor in forest restoration programs ( León and Osorio, 2014 ).

Nutrient input

Improving our understanding of the dynamics of nutrients between soil and plant can contribute to improving the restoration processes of degraded forest environments ( Quichimbo et al., 2020 ). The return of C and nutrients to the soil via litterfall input and decomposition play an important role in activating the biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems, especially in the recovery of highly degraded or low fertility soils ( Pandey et al., 2007 ; Tang et al., 2010 ; León and Osorio, 2014 ; Zhou et al., 2015 ). However, litter production and decomposition are dependent on the climate ( Souza et al., 2019 ; Sales et al., 2020 ) and the type of forest cover.

The mix of native species (mixed native) provided the highest content of nutrients (P, K, Ca, Mg and S) to the soil via leaf litterfall. This was expected since mixed native had the highest contents of these nutrients in its leaves and a high mass leaf litterfall. The diversity of species in mixed native may be responsible for the higher total nutrient content of the leaf litter produced and added to the soil compared to the A. peregrina and Eucalyptus monocultures ( Celentano et al., 2011 ; Cizungu et al., 2014 ). Planting deciduous and semi-deciduous species in the same also improves nutrient cycling, with the disposal of leaves occurring before the internal nutrient retranslocation and thus discarding nutritionally richer components compared to non-deciduous or perennial phenological groups ( Machado et al., 2016 ). Moreover, mixed forests containing N-fixing species tend to increase and improve nutrient cycling through litterfall when compared to monocultures ( Forrester et al., 2006 ; Forrester and Bauhus, 2016 ), increasing C and N contents in the soil. This process enhances the formation of soil organic matter, being an efficient alternative to accelerate the recovery processes of degraded areas, especially after mining ( Chaer et al., 2011 ). This reinforces the hypothesis that the introduction of N-fixing species such as Anadenthera peregrina , Enterolobium contortisiliquum , Piptadenia gonoacantha and Ingá sp , to mix of natives was a correct procedure for the proposed recovery of the studied degraded area.

The A. peregrina monoculture presented higher contents of C and N compared to Eucalyptus and mixed native. However, this did not result in higher contents of these elements in the litterfall due to the small size of its leaflets and the lower mass of leaf litterfall. Moreover, the A. peregrina monoculture presented the lowest C/N ratio among the coverages studied in the present work, which is an intrinsic characteristic of species belonging to the legume family ( Chaer et al., 2011 ). Rapidly growing species such as Eucalyptus tend to have low contents of nutrients in senescent components, such as litterfall, due to their efficient internal relocation of nutrients, mainly in low fertility soils ( Laclau, 2003 ). Our results show that Eucalyptus with the smallest content of N of all the cover types, and the highest C/N ratio in its leaves and twigs. Although the total nutrient content input to the soil is lower in Eucalyptus , the higher litterfall production can constitute an important source of nutrients and protection for the soil surface.

The contents of nutrients in the leaflet tend to be higher than in other components of the litterfall ( Chave et al., 2010 ). In our study, we found that the leaves presented high nutrient concentrations and total content to the soil for all forest covers. The litter accumulated on the soil surface is a store of nutrients, which is gradually released through decomposition and mineralization ( Gautam and Mandal, 2018 ). The nutrient content of the litter mass leaf was higher in mixed native for most of the studied nutrients (P, Ca, Mg, S and N). Phosphorus and S had the smallest concentrations in the leaves, reflecting the low concentrations of these elements in tropical soils and their efficient internal translocation to young tissues with a consequent decrease in senescent tissues discarded from plants.

Seasonal variations influenced the nutrient content of leaf litterfall and litter mass differently for forest covers, with mixed native being the cover with the highest influence. This cover had the highest content of all the nutrients during the dry season when there was a higher contribution of litterfall. For Eucalyptus and A. peregrina , only P and S were influenced by seasons, with the highest content observed in the rainy season. The nutrients accumulated in the leaves of the litter mass were also more concentrated in the dry season. During this period, the litter accumulates more in the soil and the decomposition rate tends to be lower, resulting in a decrease in leaching and a higher accumulation of nutrients. Therefore, our results indicate the contribution of litterfall to the reactivation of nutrient cycling and organic matter formation in degraded areas under recovery with forest species. Moreover, the increase of litterfall can also be an important factor in maintaining essential ecological processes, such as soil formation and soil erosion control in post-mining areas ( González-Rodríguez et al., 2011 ).

CONCLUSIONS

The mixed planting of forest species and the monoculture of Eucalyptus produce the higher annual litterfall yields compared to the monoculture of A. peregrina in a mined area of bauxite undergoing recovery.

Seasonality affects the litter production and decomposition rates of forest species. While the mix of native plants (mixed native) produces higher amounts of litter during the dry season, the higher litterfall production in the Eucalyptus occurs in the rainy season. Moreover, higher decomposition rates for mixed native and A. peregrina occurs during the rainy season.

Planting forest cover is important for depositing nutrients to the soil by litterfall, and the mixed plantation of native species (mixed native) produces leaf litterfall of better nutritional quality in relation to P, K, Ca, Mg and S.

Eucalyptus , A. peregrina, and the mixed native species presented good litterfall production, litter mass and nutrient return to the soil under the conditions of the study, and are efficient in the recovery process of areas degraded by bauxite mining, since they presented values similar to those of unmined areas, whether planted or of natural regeneration.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (Grand/awards number: PROEX 1840/2016) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Grand/awards number: 306950/2013-8; 310740/2017-7) for providing scholarships for the authors and financial support. The authors also thank Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio (CBA)/Votorantim Metais – Unidade Miraí for the financial support (Grand/awards number: 184015/50130266478).

REFERENCES

• Agus C, Putra PB, Faridah E, Wulandari D, Napitupulu RRP. Organic carbon stock and their dynamics in rehabilitation ecosystem areas of post open coal mining at tropical region. Procedia Eng. 2016;159:329-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.201
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.201
• Ahirwal J, Maiti SK. Restoring coal mine degraded lands in India for achieving the United Nations-sustainable development goals. Restor Ecol. 2021;30:e13606. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13606
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13606
• Bachega LR, Bouillet J-P, Piccolo MC, Saint-André L, Bouvet J-M, Nouvellon Y, Gonçalves JLM, Robin A, Laclau J-P. Decomposition of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium leaves and fine roots in tropical conditions did not meet the Home Field Advantage hypothesis. For Ecol Manage. 2016;359:33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.026
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.026
• Barliza JC, Rodríguez OB, Peláez JDL, Chávez LF. Planted forests for open coal mine spoils rehabilitation in Colombian drylands: Contributions of fine litterfall through an age chronosequence. Ecol Eng. 2019;138:180-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.07.018
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.07.018
• Barlow J, Gardner TA, Ferreira LV, Peres CA. Litter fall and decomposition in primary, secondary and plantation forests in the Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manage. 2007;247:91-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.017
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.017
• Borges SR, Santos RS, Oliveira DMS, Souza IF, Verburg EEJ, Pimentel LG, Cruz RS, Silva IR. Practices for rehabilitating bauxite‐mined areas and an integrative approach to monitor soil quality. Land Degrad Dev. 2019;30:866-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3273
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3273
• Braga JM, Defelipo BV. Determinação espectrofotométrica de fósforo em extratos de solos e plantas. Rev Ceres. 1974;21:73-85.
• Cavalcante DM, Castro MF, Chaves MTL, Silva IR, Oliveira TS. Effects of rehabilitation strategies on soil aggregation, C and N distribution and carbon management index in coffee cultivation in mined soil. Ecol Indic. 2019;107:105668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105668
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105668
• Celentano D, Zahawi RA, Finegan B, Ostertag R, Cole RJ, Holl KD. Litterfall dynamics under different tropical forest restoration strategies in Costa Rica. Biotropica. 2011;43:279-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00688.x
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00688.x
• Chaer GM, Resende AS, Campello EFC, Faria SM, Boddey RM. Nitrogen-fixing legume tree species for the reclamation of severely degraded lands in Brazil. Tree Physiol. 2011;31:139-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq116
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq116
• Chave J, Navarrete D, Almeida S, Álvarez E, Aragão LEOC, Bonal D, Châtelet P, Silva-Espejo JE, Goret J-Y, von Hildebrand P, Jiménez E, Patiño S, Peñuela MC, Phillips OL, Stevenson P, Malhi Y. Regional and seasonal patterns of litterfall in tropical South America. Biogeosciences. 2010;7:43-55. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-43-2010
  » https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-43-2010
• Cizungu L, Staelens J, Huygens D, Walangululu J, Muhindo D, Van Cleemput O, Boeckx P. Litterfall and leaf litter decomposition in a central African tropical mountain forest and Eucalyptus plantation. For Ecol Manage. 2014;326:109-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.015
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.015
• Cotrufo MF, Galdo I, Piermatteo D. Litter decomposition: Concepts, methods and future perspectives. In: Kutsch W, Bahn M, Heinemeyer A, editors. Soil carbon dynamics: An integrated methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711794.006
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711794.006
• Cotrufo MF, Lavallee JM. Soil organic matter formation, persistence, and functioning: A synthesis of current understanding to inform its conservation and regeneration. Adv Agron. 2022;172:1-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.11.002
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.11.002
• Duarte EMG, Cardoso IM, Stijnen T, Mendonça MAFC, Coelho MS, Cantarutti RB, Kuyper TW, Villani EMA, Mendonça ES. Decomposition and nutrient release in leaves of Atlantic Rainforest tree species used in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst. 2013;87:835-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9600-6
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9600-6
• Feng C, Wang Z, Ma Y, Fu S, Chen HYH. Increased litterfall contributes to carbon and nitrogen accumulation following cessation of anthropogenic disturbances in degraded forests. For Ecol Manage. 2019;432:832-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2018.10.025
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2018.10.025
• Forrester DI, Bauhus J. A review of processes behind diversity - productivity relationships in forests. Curr For Reports. 2016;2:45-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2
• Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL, Vanclay JK. Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: A review. For Ecol Manage. 2006;233:211-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012
• Gama-Rodrigues AC, Barros NF, Comerford NB. Biomass and nutrient cycling in pure and mixed stands of native tree species in southeastern Bahia, Brazil. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2007;31:287-98. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832007000200011
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832007000200011
• Gautam TP, Mandal TN. Storage and flux of nutrients in disturbed and undisturbed tropical moist forest of Eastern Nepal. Int J For Res. 2018;2018:8516321. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8516321
  » https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8516321
• Ge X, Zeng L, Xiao W, Huang Z, Geng X, Tan B. Effect of litter substrate quality and soil nutrients on forest litter decomposition: A review. Acta Ecol Sin. 2013;33:102-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.01.006
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.01.006
• Giweta M. Role of litter production and its decomposition, and factors affecting the processes in a tropical forest ecosystem: A review. J Ecol Environ. 2020;44:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-0151-2
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-0151-2
• González-Rodríguez H, Domínguez-Gómez TG, Cantú-Silva I, Gómez-Meza MV, Ramírez-Lozano RG, Pando-Moreno M, Fernández CJ. Litterfall deposition and leaf litter nutrient return in different locations at Northeastern Mexico. Plant Ecol. 2011;212:1747-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9952-9
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9952-9
• Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia - Inmet. Banco de dados meteorológicos para ensino e pesquisa-BDMEP. Brasília, DF: Inmet; 2016. Available from: http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=bdmep/bdmep
  » http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=bdmep/bdmep
• IUSS Working Group WRB. World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015: International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2015. (World Soil Resources Reports, 106).
• Jha P, Mohapatra KP. Leaf litterfall, fine root production and turnover in four major tree species of the semi-arid region of India. Plant Soil. 2010;326:481-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0027-9
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0027-9
• Krishna MP, Mohan M. Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: A review. Energy Ecol Environ. 2017;2:236-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-017-0064-9
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-017-0064-9
• Laclau JP. Nutrient dynamics throughout the rotation of eucalyptus clonal stands in Congo. Ann Bot. 2003;91:879-92. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg093
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg093
• Lanuza O, Casanoves F, Zahawi RA, Celentano D, Delgado D, Holl KD. Litterfall and nutrient dynamics shift in tropical forest restoration sites after a decade of recovery. Biotropica. 2018;50:491-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/BTP.12533
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/BTP.12533
• León JD, Osorio NW. Role of litter turnover in soil quality in tropical degraded lands of Colombia. Sci World J. 2014;2014:693981. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/693981
  » https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/693981
• Machado MR, Sampaio PDTB, Ferraz J, Camara R, Pereira MG. Nutrient retranslocation in forest species in the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Sci Agron. 2016;38:93-101. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i1.26805
  » https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i1.26805
• Machado NAM, Leite MGP, Figueiredo MA, Kozovits AR. Growing Eremanthus erythropappus in crushed laterite: A promising alternative to topsoil for bauxite-mine revegetation. J Environ Manage. 2013;129:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.006
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.006
• Martius C, Höfer H, Garcia MVB, Römbke J, Hanagarth W. Litter fall, litter stocks and decomposition rates in rainforest and agroforestry sites in central Amazonia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys. 2004;68:137-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000017468.76807.50
  » https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000017468.76807.50
• Meier CL, Bowman WD. Links between plant litter chemistry, species diversity, and below-ground ecosystem function. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:19780-5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805600105
  » https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805600105
• Miranda Neto A, Martins SV, Silva KA, Lopes AT, Demolinari RA. Litter production and leaf litter decomposition in mined area in restoration process in southeast Brazil. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2015;9:321-7.
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
• Olson JS. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology. 1963;44:322-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932179
  » https://doi.org/10.2307/1932179
• Pandey RR, Sharma G, Tripathi SK, Singh AK. Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in a subtropical natural oak forest and managed plantation in northeastern India. Forest Ecol Manag. 2007;240:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2006.12.013
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2006.12.013
• Parsons SA, Congdon RA, Lawler IR. Determinants of the pathways of litter chemical decomposition in a tropical region. New Phytol. 2014;203:873-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12852
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12852
• Quichimbo P, Jiménez L, Veintimilla D, Potthast K, Tischer A, Günter S, Mosandl R, Hamer U. Nutrient dynamics in an Andean forest region: a case study of exotic and native species plantations in southern Ecuador. New For. 2020;51:313-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09734-9
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09734-9
• Sales GB, Lessa TAM, Freitas DA, Veloso MDM, Silva MLS, Fernandes LA, Frazão LA. Litterfall dynamics and soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in the Brazilian palm swamp ecosystems. For Ecosyst. 2020;7:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00251-2
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00251-2
• Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araújo Filho JC, Oliveira JB, Cunha TJF. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5. ed. rev. ampl. Brasília, DF: Embrapa; 2018.
• Schumacher MV, Corrêa RS, Viera M, Araújo EF. Produção e decomposição de serapilheira em um povoamento de Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus globulus maidenii . Cerne. 2013;19:501-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602013000300018
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602013000300018
• Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P. Soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation: A review. Int J Soil Sediment Water. 2010;3:13
• Shrestha RK, Lal R. Changes in physical and chemical properties of soil after surface mining and reclamation. Geoderma. 2011;161:168-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.015
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.015
• Silva AO, Costa AM, Teixeira AFS, Guimarães AA, Santos JV, Moreira FMS. Soil microbiological attributes indicate recovery of an iron mining area and of the biological quality of adjacent phytophysiognomies. Ecol Indic. 2018;93:142-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.073
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.073
• Smith K, Gholz HL, Oliveira FDA. Litterfall and nitrogen-use efficiency of plantations and primary forest in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manage. 1998;109:209-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00247-3
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00247-3
• Sousa-Neto ER, Lins SRM, Martins SC, Piccolo MDC, Ferreira ML, Camargo PB, Carmo JB, Mazzi EA, Houlton BZ, Martinelli LA. Litterfall mass and nutrient fluxes over an altitudinal gradient in the coastal Atlantic Forest, Brazil. J Trop Ecol. 2017;33:261-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467417000207
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467417000207
• Souza JA, Davide AC. Deposição de serapilheira e nutrientes em uma mata não minerada e em plantações de bracatinga ( Mimosa scabrella ) e de eucalipto ( Eucalyptus saligna ) em áreas de mineração de bauxita. Cerne. 2001;7:101-13.
• Souza SR, Veloso MDM, Espírito-Santo MM, Silva JO, Sánchez-Azofeifa A, Brito BGS, Fernandes GW. Litterfall dynamics along a successional gradient in a Brazilian tropical dry forest. For Ecosyst. 2019;6:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0194-y
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0194-y
• Statsoft, I. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System). Berlin, Germany: Science Open; 2012.
• Tang J-W, Cao M, Zhang J-H, Li M-H. Litterfall production, decomposition and nutrient use efficiency varies with tropical forest types in Xishuangbanna, SW China: A 10-year study. Plant Soil. 2010;335:271-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0414-2
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0414-2
• Thompson F, Oliveira BC, Cordeiro MC, Masi BP, Rangel TP, Paz P, Freitas T, Lopes G, Silva BS, Cabral A, Soares M, Lacerda D, Vergilio CS, Lopes-Ferreira M, Lima C, Thompson C, Rezende CE. Severe impacts of the Brumadinho dam failure (Minas Gerais, Brazil) on the water quality of the Paraopeba River. Sci Total Environ. 2020;705:135914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135914
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135914
• Valente FDA, Gomes LC, Castro MF, Neves JCL, Silva IR, Oliveira TS. Influence of different tree species on autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration in a mined area under reclamation. Land Degrad Dev. 2021;32:4288-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4035
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4035
• Valente FDA, Castro MF, Lustosa Filho JF, Gomes LC, Neves JCL, Silva IR, Oliveira TS. Native multispecies and fast-growing forest root biomass increase C and N stocks in a reclaimed bauxite mining area. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195:129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10720-6
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10720-6
• Vitousek PM, Sanford RL. Nutrient cycling in most tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1986;17:137-67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001033
  » https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001033
• Wang Q, Wang S, Fan B, Yu X. Litter production, leaf litter decomposition and nutrient return in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in south China: Effect of planting conifers with broadleaved species. Plant Soil. 2007;297:201-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9333-2
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9333-2
• Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y. Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. For Ecol Manage. 2008;255:1210-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.026
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.026
• Wantzen K, Mol J. Soil erosion from agriculture and mining: a threat to tropical stream ecosystems. Agriculture. 2013;3:660-83. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture3040660
  » https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture3040660
• Worlanyo AS, Jiangfeng L. Evaluating the environmental and economic impact of mining for post-mined land restoration an land-use: A review. J Environ Manag. 2021;279:111623. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111623
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111623
• Yang L, Wang J, Huang Y, Hui D, Wen M. Effects of the interception of litterfall by the understory on carbon cycling in eucalyptus plantations of South China. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100464
  » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100464
• Zaia FC, Gama-Rodrigues AC. Ciclagem e balanço de nutrientes em povoamentos de eucalipto na região Norte Fluminense. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2004;28:843-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832004000500007
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832004000500007
• Zhang H, Yuan W, Dong W, Liu S. Seasonal patterns of litterfall in forest ecosystem worldwide. Ecol Complex. 2014;20:240-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.01.003
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.01.003
• Zhou L, Shalom A-DD, Wu P, Li S, Jia Y, Ma X. Litterfall production and nutrient return in different-aged Chinese fir ( Cunninghamia lanceolata ) plantations in South China. J For Res. 2015;26:79-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0011-y
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0011-y

Edited by

Editors: José Miguel Reichert 0000-0001-9943-2898 and Tales Tiecher 0000-0001-5612-2849.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  14 Apr 2023
• Date of issue
  2023

History

• Received
  20 Sept 2022
• Accepted
  23 Jan 2023